Print Columns   |   Web Chats   |   Blog Archives   |  

Angelos: Go Nats (Sort Of)

Stranger things have happened, but not terribly often: Baltimore Orioles owner Peter Angelos--the man who did everything in his power to stop Major League Baseball from returning to Washington and who now controls Washington Nationals' TV rights almost completely--now says he hopes the D.C. team succeeds.

In an interview with the Baltimore Sun, Angelos, who famously said that "there are no real baseball fans in Washington," now says that while he did fight the revival of the sport in Washington, "it is the nation's capital and the team is there and it ought to be supported, and hopefully both franchises will provide successful baseball."

It may not seem so terribly odd for Angelos to make conciliatory remarks now, given that he was given a whopping 90 percent share of MASN, the regional sports broadcast channel created to show both Orioles and Nationals games--his special gift for agreeing not to sue baseball over the relocation of the Nats to Washington.

But even though it is very much in Angelos' financial interest for the Nats to develop a fan base that supports his TV operation, the Orioles owner until now has seemed to have trouble mustering the words and deeds that might encourage such success. MASN's programming and advertising remain heavily weighted toward its Baltimore audience, even if the Washington region is vastly larger.

Of the 10 shows featured on the MASN web site, only one is about the Nats, and that's just the Nats post-game show. The channel features a full roster of Baltimore sports talk and coverage, but not a single program about the Nationals players, plans or past, and just one talk show focused on Washington sports (and that one, the John Riggins radio show repurposed for TV, centers largely on the Redskins). Compare that to the obsessive documentary, chat and insider shows that other regional sports networks specialize in.

Still, maybe Angelos is shifting gears. He now says Nationals Park is a lovely place and he has a friendly relationship with the owners of the Nationals, the Lerner family. He even grants O's fans permission to visit the Washington stadium without feeling disloyal to their home team. (Big of him.)

This is a sea change. Back during the District's chase of the Montreal Expos, Angelos grumbled to the Post about what he saw as Washington's greed: "Washington has the Capitol. It has the White House, Congress, the Smithsonian. It has the government office, museums and the Mall. What else does it want?"

What could be driving Angelos' charm campaign? Jealousy, perhaps? While the Nationals drew mediocre, half-full crowds to their first full set of games this week, the Nats' 23,000 crowds were a far sight better than the record low 10,505 the Orioles drew at home last week.

Or is it a whiff of panic about the still-declining fortunes of his once proud franchise? The Orioles are in the midst of a smart, long-overdue rebuilding effort on the field, but their attendance numbers are dismal, despite an unexpectedly splendid start this season.

Angelos is blaming the weather for the poor gate: "That's an example of the weather having a very depressing effect on attendance," he said. "We would have had very substantial crowds, the way we've been playing, had it not been for the weather."

It remains possible that Angelos will be proven right about the inability of the I-95 corridor to support two baseball franchises enough that both could be considered big market contenders. And perhaps he was right to see that the ultimate loser in that competition was likely to be the Orioles, simply because the Washington region is so much more populous than the Baltimore area.

But baseball analysts universally put the blame for the decline of the Orioles fan base squarely at the feet of the owner, who spent years emptying out a great franchise's talent pool and chasing away some of the team's most important assets, including managers, coaches and the best broadcaster in the game.

The Nats so far have relied on strong fan support primarily from the Virginia suburbs and the District. The real battleground for the future lies in Maryland, especially in the Montgomery and Prince George's county suburbs where fans naturally look toward Washington, but grew up identifying with the Orioles. Does Angelos now need to cultivate a more open and welcoming image for those potential customers? How will the Lerners respond? The next few years should be a good time to be a sports fan in the Maryland suburbs--who knows, a price war might even break out. Well, we can dream.

By Marc Fisher |  April 11, 2008; 8:45 AM ET
Previous: The Folly Of Measuring Character By Race | Next: Whose National Harbor Is It Anyway?


Please email us to report offensive comments.

The subsidized coward has decided he's okay with having a baseball team, how cute.

Posted by: WFY | April 11, 2008 9:56 AM

He is up to something. Never trust a ambulance chasing, scum sucking lawyer!
Watch your backs and your wallets!

Posted by: Anonymous | April 11, 2008 10:01 AM

As a fan living in western Anne Arundel county, I love having both teams. RFK (and the Nats Express) and Camdem Yards are each a 30 minute drive from my house (depending on traffic), and having the ability to see any team in baseball is a real asset to Maryland fans.

Let's hope a price war does break out! The only thing better than baseball is MORE baseball.

Posted by: Shawn | April 11, 2008 11:21 AM

If Peter the Grate didn't have the Nats by the short hairs by owning their broadcast rights, I would be more inclined to believe his magnamity.

Posted by: leetee1955 | April 11, 2008 1:45 PM

This may be impolite, but perhaps Mr. Angelos should SHUT UP. He wouldn't have a franchise to claim territory from PA to SC if it weren't for the Senators allowing the St. Louis Browns to move to Baltimore.

And the Nats Enquirer, I think, used their brilliant Stan Kasten translator on the Angelos Sun interview.

Posted by: BobT | April 11, 2008 2:31 PM

"Best broadcaster in the game"? Harry Kalas never worked for Cuban Pete.

Posted by: Vincent | April 12, 2008 1:41 PM

Peter Angelos can kiss my fat A##, he's a greedy con man without a bone of sincerity in his body. While his O's fans may head to DC I'll be continuing my 12+ yr. boycott of one of the few people obnoxious enough to topple George Steinbrenner from the pinnacle of baseball infamy.

Posted by: Arlington | April 13, 2008 6:27 PM

The ranters and ravers can work themselves up into a lather and find a boogeyman around every corner.

The reality is that MASN is paying more than half the Nationals' payroll this season - with a $28 million annual TV rights fee going to a team with a $54 million payroll.

None other than Tom Boswell wrote that MASN give the Nats "one of the top guaranteed television contracts in all of Major League Baseball."

Washington should cheer for the Nationals and the Post openly does cheer for the team.

But there are plenty of Orioles fans who would like to read their local newspaper without having their team gratuitously attacked.

Posted by: Joe Beercan | April 13, 2008 11:46 PM

I like the Orioles. I hate Angelos and minimize the amount of money I spend on his enterprises.

When someone other than Angelos owns the Orioles and this ridiculous MASN contract is renegotiated, I'll be happy to patronize Camden Yards again.

Posted by: Lindemann | April 14, 2008 10:05 PM

It's clear that the Nats are a failed franchise. Their TV ratings are the lowest in all of baseball at a miniscule .8, and they can't even draw good crowds to a new stadium; this in their fourth year of operation.

Just relocate the team and let the Orioles represent the Washington region as they did before.

Posted by: David | April 21, 2008 8:41 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.


© 2010 The Washington Post Company