Binary Man: Should Marion Barry Go To Jail?
Should Marion Barry go to jail for failing--yet again--to file his tax returns?
His last stint in the clink didn't seem to have much of an impact on the former mayor. As recently as 2005, he tested positive for marijuana and cocaine use. And in 2002, U.S. Park Police said they found crack cocaine and pot in Barry's Jaguar.
Should Barry be jailed for doing yet again exactly what got him placed on probation in 2006? That time, after he failed to file federal and D.C. income tax returns from 1999 to 2004, a federal judge let him off. The Ward 8 D.C. Council member walked out of the courthouse smiling and laughing.
As is his wont, Binary Man sees only two options here: Jail or permission from the judge to continue thumbing his nose at the system even as Barry continues to serve as a public official. Fining Barry wouldn't make sense; he has little in the way of assets and he has proven throughout his career that he is not driven by any desire to get rich. Even as people all around him were ransacking the public treasury during his many years in power, Barry has always led a modest, even barebones, lifestyle.
The two main questions here are 1) Is it necessary and important to jail Barry to maintain or restore some credibility to the government's efforts to make everyone pay taxes? and 2) Should Barry be treated the same as you or I would be in the same situation, or should he get the Tom Daschle-Timothy Geithner special treatment?
Barry, of course, is already busy trying to muddy the waters. In a friendly interview with Channel 9's Bruce Johnson, Barry reveals that he didn't file his tax returns because "I was just distracted"--a standard Barry line, but with a new twist: "I'm getting ready to get a kidney transplant." Turns out the former mayor is undergoing dialysis--three days a week, four hours a day--and has identified a donor for a transplant.
"That's no excuse" for not filing his taxes, he concedes, "but that's the reason."
(Channel 9 was so impressed with itself for scoring the interview that it has plastered a big fat red 9 logo on top of Barry's face in the video, so no one can rip off the feed without crediting the station. Unfortunately, the move renders Barry's wonderfully expressive face nearly impossible to read.)
Well, no one, least of all the proprietor of this blog, would wish Marion Barry anything but the best of health. It is difficult to imagine politics in Washington without him. But his kidney problems have zippo to do with his consistent failure to do what all citizens must do--report his income and pay the government what he owes. True to form, Barry blames the prosecutors who now want him to be jailed: "I should have known these prosecutors. They're vicious and they'll do anything to try to embarrass me and try to get at me."
Barry was quick to play the Daschle-Geithner card. Here, Binary Man agrees with the Mayor for Life wholeheartedly. Skip Barry's whining about how "the media was rather kind to" the Obama appointees when it turned out that they had been way less than honest in reporting their personal income.
Focus instead on the disparity between Daschle and Geithner on one hand and Barry on the other. Daschle--who in 1998 opined that "Make no mistake, tax cheaters cheat us all, and the IRS should enforce our laws to the letter"--had to cough up about $100,000 to cover taxes on the limo and driver he got from a friendly donor. That's about half of what Barry had to pay after his last bout of tax distraction.
Sure, Daschle lost his chance to be a member of the president's cabinet and suffered a round of public humiliation, but no prosecutor is asking for jail time for him.
Barry, however, is a repeat offender, someone who seems to believe, even after years of prosecutorial and media attention on this matter, that he does not have to play by the same rules as the rest of us.
Daschle lived like a king; Barry, like a modest civil servant. Daschle expressed regret for his actions; Barry seems reluctant to concede wrongdoing.
In all of these cases, Binary Man thinks it's in the government's interest to come down hard on the scofflaws. If you can't make a bright public example of high officials, then you don't have much hope of winning tax compliance from Joe Average. Even if a couple of months in the slammer wouldn't change Barry's ways, even if he is 72 and in shaky health, the feds and the judge ought to see the value in holding Barry not to some astronomically high standard of ethical purity, but just to some minimal, basic standard of acceptable behavior.
Embarrassment didn't work, probation didn't work, tough talk didn't work. It's time to send a message, both to Barry and to the broader public. And prosecutors should start a file on those other guys while they're at it. For too long, public corruption hasn't been a strong focus of D.C. prosecutors, so it's good to see them trying to get tough on Barry. Now they need to broaden their selection of targets.
Please email us to report offensive comments.
Posted by: jmsbh | February 17, 2009 9:16 AM
Posted by: win_harrington | February 17, 2009 9:36 AM
Posted by: oknow1 | February 17, 2009 10:01 AM
Posted by: wildfyre99 | February 17, 2009 10:15 AM
Posted by: crete | February 17, 2009 10:37 AM
Posted by: kajr | February 17, 2009 10:38 AM
Posted by: epjd | February 17, 2009 10:51 AM
Posted by: nall92 | February 17, 2009 10:55 AM
Posted by: WarshingtonDC | February 17, 2009 11:02 AM
Posted by: djwonder36 | February 17, 2009 11:08 AM
Posted by: buffysummers | February 17, 2009 11:14 AM
Posted by: dlk117561 | February 17, 2009 11:18 AM
Posted by: why6 | February 17, 2009 11:19 AM
Posted by: gilbertbp | February 17, 2009 11:20 AM
Posted by: gbooksdc | February 17, 2009 11:25 AM
Posted by: jercha | February 17, 2009 11:36 AM
Posted by: taxworep | February 17, 2009 11:47 AM
Posted by: firstname.lastname@example.org | February 17, 2009 11:48 AM
Posted by: free-donny | February 17, 2009 11:50 AM
Posted by: meelar | February 17, 2009 11:51 AM
Posted by: jfudge1 | February 17, 2009 12:21 PM
Posted by: hoos3014 | February 17, 2009 12:27 PM
Posted by: stodge | February 17, 2009 12:33 PM
Posted by: livinginoregon | February 17, 2009 12:37 PM
Posted by: civilrightist | February 17, 2009 12:48 PM
Posted by: forgetthis | February 17, 2009 1:19 PM
Posted by: lydgate | February 17, 2009 1:31 PM
Posted by: aypub | February 17, 2009 1:33 PM
Posted by: niceshoes1 | February 17, 2009 1:35 PM
Posted by: love2much SE | February 17, 2009 1:43 PM
Posted by: Skowronek | February 17, 2009 1:45 PM
Posted by: nonsensical2001 | February 17, 2009 2:00 PM
Posted by: dmsblogmail | February 17, 2009 2:14 PM
Posted by: swatkins1 | February 17, 2009 2:52 PM
Posted by: FairlingtonBlade | February 17, 2009 8:20 PM
Posted by: DCWatcher3 | February 17, 2009 10:33 PM
Posted by: sarjo220 | February 18, 2009 12:04 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.