Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
On Twitter: RedskinsInsider and PostSports  |  Facebook  |  E-mail alerts: Redskins and Sports  |  RSS

Haynesworth is the key in Redskins' use of 3-4 defense

The Redskins' impending switch from a 4-3 defense to a 3-4 base front was among the worst-kept secrets during the scouting combine at Indianapolis.

Coach Mike Shanahan's plans for the Redskins were among the main discussion topics for some coaches, agents and reporters during late-night sessions at downtown restaurants and bars. Shanahan revealed little in his media availability last week at Lucas Oil Field but acknowledged, "the 3-4 defense has done an excellent job. That's why a lot of teams have gone to the 3-4."

The Redskins are in contract negotiations to re-sign veteran defensive lineman Phillip Daniels, whom they plan to use as an end in their new scheme, which is expected to still include some 4-3 principles. Versatile defensive lineman Lorenzo Alexander will add outside linebacker duties to his responsibilities, people familiar with the situation said, and the Redskins are expected to pursue defensive end Julius Peppers - who apparently wants to stand up in a 3-4 attack - in free agency.


Regardless of the moves the Redskins make on defense this offseason, it appears Pro Bowl defensive tackle Albert Haynesworth is the key to making the smoothest transition possible to a new defensive front.

Haynesworth primarily would be the nose tackle in a 3-4. Why? Because no one else on the roster is capable of collapsing the pocket quite like Haynesworth when he's healthy and motivated. And with fewer linemen on the front in a 3-4, getting major production from the nose is paramount.

Last season, Haynesworth expressed his displeasure with former defensive coordinator Greg Blache's disciplined 4-3 scheme. Haynesworth did not have the freedom to maneuver and rush the passer as he did with the Tennessee Titans, and I'm not sure how things would be better for him getting double teamed often at the nose.

But perhaps Shanahan and new defensive coordinator Jim Haslett will unveil some innovative approach that will enable Haynesworth to break free from offensive linemen and get to the quarterback while also fulfilling all the other duties they will ask of him at the center of the line.

Haynesworth had four sacks and was credited with 29 unassisted tackles in only 12 games during the 2009 season. Some members of the organization privately expressed frustration about Haynesworth's conditioning, and Shanahan has said he expects Haynesworth to be in great condition by the start of the season.

On April 1, Haynesworth is due a $21 million option bonus that is guaranteed. Combined with his signing bonus of $5 million and first-year base salary of $6 million, Haynesworth, in his first 14 months with the Redskins, will have received $32 million of the $41 million he is guaranteed.

In the Zone

Today's question in the Redskins Tailgate Zone from moderator Matt "Bobby" McFarland: Do you think Sam Bradford's injury history makes him too great a risk for the Redskins?

By Jason Reid  |  March 1, 2010; 6:44 AM ET
Categories:  Albert Haynesworth , Jason Reid , Jim Haslett  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Redskins will use Alexander at outside LB in 3-4 scheme
Next: Samuels expected to announce retirement Thursday

Comments

I hope this works for them, but I wonder why Alexander would be better suited as a linebacker.

Posted by: jpatrick1 | March 1, 2010 7:15 AM | Report abuse

Julius Peppers??? The more things change the more things stay the same.

Posted by: moseley_brian | March 1, 2010 7:20 AM | Report abuse

LO-A has a great motor and is obviously brimming with smarts between the ears. If anyone can pull it off its him. I got to believe GOLSTON is toast and maybe also MONTGOMERY in a REDSKINS uni.

DANIELS, PEPPERS, CARTER and JARMON would be a nice rotation at DE in a 3-4. I said last night if DANIELS was signed another DE would have to be inked to carry the load. I don't think RENALDO WYNN will be back. How many DE's does a normal 3-4 set carry anyway?

That gives us FLETCHER, GATEWOOD, ORAKPO, WILSON, BLADES, and HENSON? at LB with no offer yet to McINTOSH. ROCKY should be offered soon. I gotta' believe they want him back, or at least the team wants a pick if he walks.

Posted by: glawrence007 | March 1, 2010 7:29 AM | Report abuse

Julius Peppers??? The more things change the more things stay the same.

Posted by: moseley_brian

No one else is reporting this and we all know how much inside info the post gets from the park.

Posted by: jm220 | March 1, 2010 7:31 AM | Report abuse

Oh, and LO-A at LB. Sounds thin to me.

Posted by: glawrence007 | March 1, 2010 7:33 AM | Report abuse

With no salary cap just pay Peppers 30 million for one season. (sarcasm)

Sadly I could see Snyder doing that, hopefully this offseason won't screw us when the cap comes back and it will.

Posted by: caps512 | March 1, 2010 7:37 AM | Report abuse

Nobody can convince me that Haynesworth is worth that money. What a complete waste...

Let's not make that mistake again with Peppers. If Peppers comes here, then Danny is still running the show and nothing has changed.

Let's hope that's not true.

Posted by: brownwood26 | March 1, 2010 7:41 AM | Report abuse

Sounds like the same old stuff but I'll wait to see the legitimacy of the statement.

Posted by: scampbell1975 | March 1, 2010 7:41 AM | Report abuse

While Peppers is good, he is way too speratic. We don't need someone to take downs off, anyway shouldn't they be worried about the other side of the ball.

Posted by: joeboggs | March 1, 2010 7:42 AM | Report abuse

I think the reason they are talking about linebacker and Lorenzo Alexander is easy to figure out. One of the things the 3-4 can do is drop perceived lineman into coverage, so what better way to prepare him for doing just that than to let him play a bit more at backer in preseason?

Posted by: Veretax | March 1, 2010 7:45 AM | Report abuse

DANIELS, PEPPERS, CARTER and JARMON would be a nice rotation at DE in a 3-4. I said last night if DANIELS was signed another DE would have to be inked to carry the load. I don't think RENALDO WYNN will be back. How many DE's does a normal 3-4 set carry anyway?
Posted by: glawrence007 | March 1, 2010 7:29 AM | Report abuse

Peppers wouldn't be DE in a 3-4, he's def not stout enough. You need big bodies for your front 3. Peppers would be an OLB, but forget it, the dude just wants to get paid. I really hope we don't pick him up.

If we do, he'll have a great season this year and then disappear for the rest of the contract. He's as unreliable as they come.

Posted by: BostonWarPath | March 1, 2010 7:51 AM | Report abuse

The only draft expert that counts with a warning:

Mayock applies "buyer beware" tag to Bruce Campbell
Posted by Mike Florio on March 1, 2010 7:39 AM ET
Our item from Saturday regarding Maryland's Bruce Campbell, who put up eye-popping numbers at the Scouting Combine as an offensive lineman but with whom multiple teams have yet to fall in love, sparked a mixed bag of responses. One league source insisted that Campbell is a sure-fire first-round pick -- another one said that Campbell "tests better than he plays."

It could be the first concrete example in 2010 of the strange dynamic that plays out in the pre-draft buildup. Teams that love a guy will put out bad opinions about him, in the hopes that the player will still be on the board when they use their pick. Teams that hate a guy will talk him up, with the goal of getting someone else to waste a pick on him, thereby pushing the rest of the draft pool one step farther down the ladder.

In Campbell's case, however, a guy who studies this stuff as closely as anyone was candid. Mike Mayock placed the "buyer beware" tag on Campbell during Sunday's excellent NFLN coverage, explaining that the former Terp has a lot of "average" film.

And that's the most direct tie to Jets linebacker Vernon Gholston, whose stellar workout numbers and Paul Orndorff physique got the team to overlook plenty of subpar film. Though we've come to greatly respect the recent efforts of Jets G.M. Mike Tannenbaum, just think about how much better that team could be if they'd drafted an actual contributor with the sixth overall pick two seasons ago.

Of course, the Campbell comment wasn't Mayock's best of the day. When a former BYU player prepared to run the 40-yard dash, Mayock said, "They aren't allowed to have sex until they're married so they all get married at 17."

Cue Maureen Stapleton lecturing Griffin Dunne in Johnny Dangerously.

Posted by: brownwood26 | March 1, 2010 7:56 AM | Report abuse

Beep Beep

Posted by: Flounder21 | March 1, 2010 7:57 AM | Report abuse

Peppers would be an OLB, but forget it, the dude just wants to get paid. I really hope we don't pick him up.

Don't know about the LB part, but I roll with the payday. As someone already said here, "....the more things [at REDSKINS PARK] change the more they stay the same."

Posted by: glawrence007 | March 1, 2010 8:07 AM | Report abuse

Peppers is not a long-term solution. At his age he has at best three good years left.

Posted by: BigTrees | March 1, 2010 8:57 AM | Report abuse

this cannot be true. Considering they spent a 3rd on Jarmon just a year ago in the supplemental draft, a move as reactionary as this would prove that the culture in Ashburn has not changed in the least. If they're really looking to bring in a proven player why not Karlos Dansby who plays a position of far greater need for this team right now? Or even consider speaking with the Raiders about Nnamdi Asomugha? Goodness.

Posted by: tylerjeffries | March 1, 2010 9:39 AM | Report abuse

Shanahan isn't a young man and he didn't come to DC to put down roots. Dude is channeling Bruce's daddy - The Future is Now. This team is seriously devoid of play makers and play makers win divisions, conferences, and championships. Signing Peppers won't be Snyder's call - that'll be Shanahan 100%.

Posted by: coparker5 | March 1, 2010 9:40 AM | Report abuse

NO to Peppers

Posted by: 4thFloor | March 1, 2010 9:52 AM | Report abuse

If you sign Julius Peppers with a $30 million signing bonus for one year in an uncapped year, are there any repercussions the following year when he will not be on the roster? I am still confused by this uncapped year stuff.

Posted by: JohnWWW | March 1, 2010 9:57 AM | Report abuse

Agree that we need playmakers, but there are plenty of them out there, and cheaper than Peppers. I'd take Gary Brackett (smart, disciplined, hard working, proven) a thousand times before I'd take Peppers, and he'd come at a fraction of the price. Same for Antonio Pierce, since we're talking about 2-3 year players. If you're gonna overpay, do it for someone like Darren Sharper or Antrel Rolle. They can take half the field away, thus making things easier for everyone on D. Peppers is like Randy Moss. He's great when the play directly involves him, but he's a liability when the play doesn't come right at him. You lose as much as you gain when you average it out, (unless like the Patriots you have enough other people to pick up the slack, but then again like the Pats, you don't overpay in that scenario).

Posted by: jmadams | March 1, 2010 10:05 AM | Report abuse

Agree that we need playmakers, but there are plenty of them out there, and cheaper than Peppers. I'd take Gary Brackett (smart, disciplined, hard working, proven) a thousand times before I'd take Peppers, and he'd come at a fraction of the price. Same for Antonio Pierce, since we're talking about 2-3 year players. If you're gonna overpay, do it for someone like Darren Sharper or Antrel Rolle. They can take half the field away, thus making things easier for everyone on D. Peppers is like Randy Moss. He's great when the play directly involves him, but he's a liability when the play doesn't come right at him. You lose as much as you gain when you average it out, (unless like the Patriots you have enough other people to pick up the slack, but then again like the Pats, you don't overpay in that scenario).

Posted by: jmadams | March 1, 2010 10:08 AM | Report abuse

NO!!! This team needs a top-to-bottom overhaul. With the new regime at the top it's time to rehab from the Snyder/Vinny addiction to this "quick fix" mentality of pursuing overpriced priced players who are past their prime.

Posted by: bones21 | March 1, 2010 10:41 AM | Report abuse

I really get a kick out of reading articles where the writer knows nothing about football and then makes statements like he does. For example, "Last season, Haynesworth expressed his displeasure with former defensive coordinator Greg Blache's disciplined 4-3 scheme. Haynesworth did not have the freedom to maneuver and rush the passer as he did with the Tennessee Titans, and I'm not sure how things would be better for him getting double teamed often at the nose.

But perhaps Shanahan and new defensive coordinator Jim Haslett will unveil some innovative approach that will enable Haynesworth to break free from offensive linemen and get to the quarterback while also fulfilling all the other duties they will ask of him at the center of the line."

Rushing the passer and playing the run are two totally seperate things. You have 2 gap responsibility at the nose, front and back side A gap, against the run. Against the pass, you rush up the middle and try to collapse the pocket. Two different responsibilities. As a Nose, you have to read run or pass and then execute. There is nothing "innovative" for the coaches to create here. AH will be doubled no matter where he is on the line. You move him in a 4-3 to create mismatches. You can do less of that in a 3-4, that is why the coaches this weekend and players have repeatedly said they will run both this season, just like they did last. But it would take a writer to know something about football to pass that along.

Posted by: 6-2StackMonster | March 1, 2010 10:49 AM | Report abuse

"Some members of the organization privately expressed frustration about Haynesworth's conditioning, and Shanahan has said he expects Haynesworth to be in great condition by the start of the season."

One would hope so. It's not an unreasonable expectation. But, and here's the Big Fig Newton, right boys and girls . . .

"On April 1, Haynesworth is due a $21 million option bonus that is guaranteed."

Sing it with me now!!

Hey, Hey, Hey!! IT'S FAT ALBERT!!

NA, NA, NA GONNA HAVE A GOOD TIME!! HEY! HEY! HEY!!

NA, NA, NA GONNA HAVE A GOOD TIME!! HEY! HEY! HEY!!

NA, NA, NA GONNA HAVE A GOOD TIME!! HEY! HEY! HEY!!

NA, NA, NA GONNA HAVE A GOOD TIME!! HEY! HEY! HEY!!

IT'S FAT ALBER!!


Posted by: VeloStrummer | March 1, 2010 11:31 AM | Report abuse

"Some members of the organization privately expressed frustration about Haynesworth's conditioning, and Shanahan has said he expects Haynesworth to be in great condition by the start of the season."

One would hope so. It's not an unreasonable expectation. But, and here's the Big Fig Newton, right boys and girls . . .

"On April 1, Haynesworth is due a $21 million option bonus that is guaranteed."

Sing it with me now!!

Hey, Hey, Hey!! IT'S FAT ALBERT!!

NA, NA, NA GONNA HAVE A GOOD TIME!! HEY! HEY! HEY!!

NA, NA, NA GONNA HAVE A GOOD TIME!! HEY! HEY! HEY!!

NA, NA, NA GONNA HAVE A GOOD TIME!! HEY! HEY! HEY!!

NA, NA, NA GONNA HAVE A GOOD TIME!! HEY! HEY! HEY!!

IT'S FAT ALBER!!


Posted by: VeloStrummer | March 1, 2010 11:32 AM | Report abuse

"Some members of the organization privately expressed frustration about Haynesworth's conditioning, and Shanahan has said he expects Haynesworth to be in great condition by the start of the season."

One would hope so. It's not an unreasonable expectation. But, and here's the Big Fig Newton, right boys and girls . . .

"On April 1, Haynesworth is due a $21 million option bonus that is guaranteed."

Sing it with me now!!

Hey, Hey, Hey!! IT'S FAT ALBERT!!

NA, NA, NA GONNA HAVE A GOOD TIME!! HEY! HEY! HEY!!

NA, NA, NA GONNA HAVE A GOOD TIME!! HEY! HEY! HEY!!

NA, NA, NA GONNA HAVE A GOOD TIME!! HEY! HEY! HEY!!

NA, NA, NA GONNA HAVE A GOOD TIME!! HEY! HEY! HEY!!

IT'S FAT ALBERT!!


Posted by: VeloStrummer | March 1, 2010 11:32 AM | Report abuse

This is what happens when you sign coaches 55+ years old. To truly rebuild, you have to start with a younger head coach that you are totally committed to.

Posted by: tramellcanady | March 1, 2010 11:33 AM | Report abuse

Fat, lazy, take off half the plays, $100 million lineman to be the key support of your defense? Seriously?
Signing a defensive end, who can only rush the passer (no run defense exhibited in Carolina)at around $20 million plus a year? Who continues to make these decisions? Shannahan can want anything he desires, but, when you sign a slob for $40 million guaranteed, are you going to bench or cut him? Please!

Posted by: KDSmallJr | March 1, 2010 11:39 AM | Report abuse

Ahem......excuse me a minute......how can Albert Haynesworth's $21 million "option" bonus due on April 1, 2010 be "guaranteed" ??? IF it's an "option" and the Redskins DECLINE the "option", WHY then would they have to pay it to him (aka "guaranteed")?????

Am I missing something here or is this just VERY creative contract writing on the part of his agent?!?!?!?!

Posted by: Bigrcube | March 1, 2010 11:41 AM | Report abuse


$32 million for what? Stompworth is a bust and $nyder is a sucker. Signing Pepper's will be a sign that nothing has changed, including the punch drunk fans that buy into this circus year after year. Do us all a favor:

BOYCOTT $NYDER OR YOU'RE PART OF THE PROBLEN!!!!!!

Posted by: hessone | March 1, 2010 11:50 AM | Report abuse


$32 million for what? Stompworth is a bust and $nyder is a sucker. Signing Pepper's will be a sign that nothing has changed, including the punch drunk fans that buy into this circus year after year. Do us all a favor:

BOYCOTT $NYDER OR YOU'RE PART OF THE PROBLEM!!!!!!

Posted by: hessone | March 1, 2010 11:50 AM | Report abuse


$32 million for what? Stompworth is a bust and $nyder is a sucker. Signing Pepper's will be a sign that nothing has changed, including the punch drunk fans that buy into this circus year after year. Do us all a favor:

BOYCOTT $NYDER OR YOU'RE PART OF THE PROBLEM!!!!!!

Posted by: hessone | March 1, 2010 11:50 AM | Report abuse

Well, you cannot rely on Haynesworth to make a 3-4 work, and I doubt that's what Haslett intends.

Albert is a luxury and you get production about 3 out of 5 plays, though he seems to step it up in short yardage situations and is legitimately solid there.

The only way a 3-4 makes sense (with Lorenzo Alexander as a stand up OLB/DE or Jarmon in the same role is if we essentially run a 4-3, but just happen to refer to the DEs as OLBs because they are in a 2 pt stance).

Julius Peppers (too old, we've been down this road) or Dansby might be in the cards in some other year when Haynesworth wasn't owed 30 million and the offensive line consists of:
_________ dockery rabach ________ _________.

As it happens, Peppers could wind up in NY or on the greaseballs. As if a case even needed to be made after last season, that's all the more reason to focus on the offensive line.

I'm just hoping that by the weekend we've signed at least one unrestricted OL starter.

Posted by: BrooklynSkins | March 1, 2010 12:13 PM | Report abuse

Haynesworth could be a great nose tackle and make the switch work.I would just put his ass there and tell him thats where you are gonna play like it or not.Show him and the team who the hell is in charge.It's time for the coaches to run the team and not the players.This would send the message to the rest of the team that no matter who you are you do whats best for the team.

Posted by: lpddawg | March 1, 2010 12:22 PM | Report abuse

only the names change....every freakin offseason the skins go out and overpay for some over the hill player who is supposed to either light up the defense or offense....NOBODY wants to play for Snydley Whiplash and the skins...they just go there for the big money to coast into retirement.......so by all means...GO GET JULIUS PEPPERS

Posted by: TerpfanMA | March 1, 2010 12:45 PM | Report abuse

I have jumped up and down and repeatedly posted to "Boycott Snyder" all last season , so I am an easy with what i am about to write. Peppers is a Maybe. Ok its out there. If there was a salary cap then I would vote NO. But based on a presumption that one way or another Allen can craft a contract that is agreeable and that front loads the contract into the uncapped year why not. Is not the complaint about Snyder spending money is not the willingness to write the check it is he writes checks for older players and gives up the ability to stock talented young players for depth. Metaphorically in years past he has $50 to buy the groceries this week and proceeds to fall in love with a $15 T-Bone and $25 bottle of wine leaving him with $10 to get the rest of the weeks meals. But if and only if Allen and Snyder can create a contract that would in essence allow the Redskins to spend $200 on groceries this week and then only pay have to $5 the next few times to the store for those bought this week then it makes sense. Right? Now if whatever they do this season will continue the stranglehold on the cap then it is just more lunacy. Pretty much this is a test of Allen and the Shan. If it works then Shanwow!!

Now as far as 3-4 DE and LB. 3-4 DE are often DT's or LG DE's they have to challenge the OT and OGs every down. But that is what makes the Peppers at LB make so much sense. Your OLB lineup could be Peppers/Alexander and Orakpo/Jarmon. they all need to be quick and big.

Its doubtful the Skins would let any of their DT's as they would assume roles next to Haynesworth. And Montgomery is the only DT on the roster who is big enough to spell Haynesworth.

Posted by: Hank4 | March 1, 2010 12:48 PM | Report abuse

the team i have always heard connected to peppers was the falcons

Posted by: mdoughtie22 | March 1, 2010 12:51 PM | Report abuse

The skins could go out right now and buy the ENTIRE NEW ORLEANS SAINTS team and STILL would not make the playoffs this year....AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Dumb freakin skins...hahahahahahahah

Posted by: TerpfanMA | March 1, 2010 12:52 PM | Report abuse

All the Skins should see are OL's and nothing else. The moment they start tinkering with Peppers, the season is done!

Posted by: richs91 | March 1, 2010 1:04 PM | Report abuse

any other owner I would said no but the one we have who really have the money in a uncap year. why not. if the owner can buy the player to win a championship.I don,t care how they do I a championship will make me and million of skins fan very very happy

Posted by: lostdogrwd1011 | March 1, 2010 1:13 PM | Report abuse

"Haynesworth did not have the freedom to maneuver and rush the passer as he did with the Tennessee Titans, and I'm not sure how things would be better for him getting double teamed often at the nose."


-------

Since when has Haynesworth handling a Double-Team EVER BEEN AN ISSUE?

Posted by: filmchis | March 1, 2010 1:34 PM | Report abuse

This is what happens when you sign coaches 55+ years old. To truly rebuild, you have to start with a younger head coach that you are totally committed to.

Posted by: tramellcanady | March 1, 2010 11:33 AM | Report abuse


-------

the "younger head coach" you seek is probably Kyle Shanahan. Mike may not be here long but I expect his son Kyle is a key part of the long term rebuild.

Posted by: filmchis | March 1, 2010 1:51 PM | Report abuse

So Albert can get his 21 million on April 1 and then be unable to play nose in camp this summer? What happens then?

Nose tackle will tire Albert out faster than tackle so he is likely to play even less than in 2009. that doesn't sound lilke a good plan.

Posted by: Pensfans | March 1, 2010 2:12 PM | Report abuse

So if the go after Peppers and move to a 3-4 D. this might be there line up in the front 7
Carter-Haynesworth-Daniels
Peppers-Flethcer-Blades-Oracpo

Not Bad Huh!!

Posted by: Bigmon411 | March 1, 2010 2:21 PM | Report abuse

Personally, I will be shocked if Haynesworth plays NT next season. I have had this conversation w/a season ticket holder at work a few times.

Albert would be miserable and make everyone else miserable if they tried to move him to the nose. He plays 3-technique, that means the DT who plays on the OUTSIDE shoulder of the G. Just another example of people who know little about football, making statements based solely on the physical demensions of a player.

I hope that they only mix in some 3-4 or play a hybrid version like Baltimore. By the way, in that defense Ngata plays DE not NT (contrary to popular belief).

Posted by: SportzWiz | March 1, 2010 5:37 PM | Report abuse

Interesting opinion on the redskins switch to 3-4. check it out.

http://billythedistinguishedgentlemen.blogspot.com/

Posted by: b145579 | March 1, 2010 5:45 PM | Report abuse

As long as Danny has zero input in the signing of Peppers, I have faith in Shan and Allen that they'll make the right decision.

Posted by: c_e_daniel | March 1, 2010 6:20 PM | Report abuse

I say no to Peppers, our offense is what stinks, can we sign somebody or something to improve our crappy offense, if we have to mess around with free agency?

We went down this road last year with Fat Daddy, and our offense stunk!!

Posted by: 72Redskins | March 1, 2010 6:58 PM | Report abuse

I hope that they only mix in some 3-4 or play a hybrid version like Baltimore. By the way, in that defense Ngata plays DE not NT (contrary to popular belief).

Posted by: SportzWiz | March 1, 2010 5:37 PM

Alote Ngata is a nose tackle.

Posted by: abxinc | March 2, 2010 12:02 AM | Report abuse

The skins could go out right now and buy the ENTIRE NEW ORLEANS SAINTS team and STILL would not make the playoffs this year....AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Dumb freakin skins...hahahahahahahah

Posted by: TerpfanMA | March 1, 2010 12:52 PM | Report abuse

Why are you even on this site? You obviously aren't a fan of the Skins. I hate all the losing but I still love this team. Its unfortunate that we have been subjected to so much mediocrity and worse for so long now, but when they start winning championships again I will have been here all along, hoping and supporting them like I have for the past 33 years.

Posted by: scottmando | March 2, 2010 6:31 AM | Report abuse

By the way, I think that if Haynesworth is the best option at NoseTackle you play him there whether he likes it or not. Force him to work and be in shape, he certainly is paid enough for it. If he hates it that much, maybe he will negotiate a buy-out and we can be free of his lazy ass if thats how it really is.

Posted by: scottmando | March 2, 2010 6:37 AM | Report abuse

Check out this article on the redskins switch to the 3-4 defense: http://billythedistinguishedgentlemen.blogspot.com/

Posted by: b145579 | March 2, 2010 8:42 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company