Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
On Twitter: RedskinsInsider and PostSports  |  Facebook  |  E-mail alerts: Redskins and Sports  |  RSS

Dick Vermeil makes bold prediction about Larry Johnson, Clinton Portis

Dick Vermeil, who coached Larry Johnson in Kansas City, had an interesting take on his former running back's arrival in Washington. It seems that Vermeil thinks it won't be long before Johnson unseats Clinton Portis as the starter, Rick Maese writes.

"He will take over the running back position," said Vermeil, who coached Johnson in Kansas City from 2003 to '05. "That's what I think. He'll push that guy right out of a job. Larry Johnson will work all week -- he'll work Wednesday, Thursday, Friday and Saturday -- and he'll make you start him on Sundays."

What's your take on the situation?


For more on the topic, go to the Redskins Tailgate Zone. The question of the day is whether the Redskins have added too many players with baggage.

At the Bog...

Dan Steinberg checks out Forbes' list of million/billion/trillion-aires and where Daniel Snyder and other owners of local pro franchises rank.

By Cindy Boren  |  March 16, 2010; 11:58 AM ET
Categories:  Clinton Portis , Free agency  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Strong showing for Shanahan's first day of voluntary workouts
Next: Redskins' switch to a 3-4 defense is all about creating turnovers

Comments

First

Posted by: jiza32 | March 16, 2010 12:21 PM | Report abuse

Sounds good to me!

Posted by: CheyenneWY | March 16, 2010 12:22 PM | Report abuse

I wouldn't bet against it. Portis has done as he pleased for too long. I hope he does get pushed out.

Posted by: ridgely1 | March 16, 2010 12:26 PM | Report abuse

Great news coming from a man who cries daily ! I'm trying to get a trial date for big "BEN" current rape charges in GA.

Posted by: skinsinsider101 | March 16, 2010 12:26 PM | Report abuse

Now this is blog-worthy. A quote from a respected source regarding something relevant. I hope he unseats Clinton. That means Larry is outworking him during the week.

Posted by: MadeRED | March 16, 2010 12:28 PM | Report abuse

I'll believe it when I see it. My guess is some young guy drafted in the later rounds or perhaps undrafted will show up and supplant both of them.

Posted by: Curzon417 | March 16, 2010 12:28 PM | Report abuse

101,
Glad to know you're on the case.
Now we can all rest easy.

Posted by: _Stumped_ | March 16, 2010 12:30 PM | Report abuse

MOST IMPORTANTLY READ THE LAST PARAGRAPH.

Potential draft pick Russell Okung visiting the Lions today
By Tom Kowalski
March 15, 2010, 1:45PM
ALLEN PARK -- The Detroit Lions are expected to draft Nebraska defensive tackle Ndamukong Suh with the second overall pick. If he's there.

If the St. Louis Rams, who have the first overall pick, take Suh, the Lions could change course and go for offense. One of the targets on that side of the ball is Oklahoma State tackle Russell Okung, who is visiting the Lions today. Each NFL team is allowed to bring in 30 potential draft prospects for an up-close-and-personal inspection.

The Lions have already had their 15-minute meeting with Okung at the combine and several members of the organization also had dinner with him.

Okung is a potential target because he would fill one nagging hole in the team's roster - left guard. If Okung is drafted, he would likely play left tackle with Jeff Backus moving inside. Okung, at 6-5 and 307 pounds, is an excellent pass protector while Backus is a better run blocker.

By the way, it's also possible that Okung could be Detroit's top target. Teams at the top of the board like to draft "position value'' players -- the positions that usually cost the most money to fill. Those include quarterback, left tackle and pass rushers.

Posted by: 4thFloor | March 16, 2010 12:33 PM | Report abuse

I thought we were expecting a visit from Andra Davis/ Johnson, cant remember the LB name from Denver, but he is an ILB right? I thought he was visiting, do we have any word on that???

Come on Mayor/ Maese start calling sources, dig up some info...you know, what reporters do

Posted by: mhartz1 | March 16, 2010 12:33 PM | Report abuse

Just when I was ready to give J Reid props, I see that this blog is a spinoff of Rick Maese's story. SMH

Posted by: MadeRED | March 16, 2010 12:35 PM | Report abuse

"He will take over the running back position," said Vermeil, who coached Johnson in Kansas City from 2003 to '05. "That's what I think. He'll push that guy right out of a job."

You mean like what Jamaal Charles did to him in Kansas City?

I'd rather draft B Tate in round 4 and give Tate and Ganther a shot at backing up Portis.

Posted by: MistaMoe | March 16, 2010 12:35 PM | Report abuse

***BRACKET TIIIIIME***

Group Name: RI Hamster Nation

Group Type: Private

Group Creator: 4thFloor

Group Motto: "We don't let facts get in the way....."


Group Password (Password): ita

Locking Rules: Locked - Entries may leave/join group only before the season begins

http://games.espn.go.com/tcmen/en/group?groupID=52730&entryID=1034365

Posted by: 4thFloor | March 16, 2010 12:36 PM | Report abuse

Is that a testament to Johnsons strong wok wthic or a slap against Clintons aversion to the same?

Posted by: CheyenneWY | March 16, 2010 12:37 PM | Report abuse

I'm weeping like Vermeil, at least on the inside, at the thought that the utterly objectionable Larry Johnson not only has been signed by the Skins but might emerge as our starting RB... ugh...

Posted by: NateinthePDX | March 16, 2010 12:37 PM | Report abuse

I wouldn't doubt that it's possible, though I don't know if it's that certain as Vermin makes it out to be.

I can see us actually going to a Riggo/Washington scenario w/ CPo.
The only way Clinton is going to remain is if he switches back to a scat role again.

Twofold: He can't keep taking the incredible bruising he's been subjected to (blocks not withstanding, you can prep for those). Additionally, the only way to maintain speed at his age is to slim down! (thk u Mr. Green).

Posted by: DikShuttle | March 16, 2010 12:39 PM | Report abuse

MistaMoe - Gannther went to Seattle with Stump Mitchel....Not to be confused with Stump from Portland...

Posted by: 4thFloor | March 16, 2010 12:40 PM | Report abuse

Hey, speaking of Ganther, PFT says we may let him go to Seattle? anyone?

Posted by: DikShuttle | March 16, 2010 12:43 PM | Report abuse

Thx 4th.

So I guess we're bringin in a youngun?

I'm down w/ that.

Posted by: DikShuttle | March 16, 2010 12:44 PM | Report abuse

Lions are taking Okung...book it.

Skins are likely going to get jammed with a high pick and no worthy players of need available.

Perfect storm. Rams get Bradford, no one wants to trade up for the pick, eesh.

Posted by: McMetal | March 16, 2010 12:44 PM | Report abuse

How hard can it be to unseat a below average RB?

We have a plethora of mediocrity at RB.

Posted by: oldnova | March 16, 2010 12:44 PM | Report abuse

Dick Vermiel = Sam Huff = Senility

Posted by: Original_etrod | March 16, 2010 12:54 PM | Report abuse

Running Back controversy followed soon by QB controversy as soon as we sign a veteran like Rex or Simms and draft a kid in the first 5 rounds.

Competition is a better word but the media likes the C word...controversy.

Posted by: Diesel44 | March 16, 2010 12:55 PM | Report abuse

Is that a testament to Johnsons strong wok wthic or a slap against Clintons aversion to the same?

Posted by: CheyenneWY | March 16, 2010 12:37 PM

Neither.

It is a testament to the undying faith of a man. Dick Vermeil.

The same man who had undying faith in Lawrence Phillips...Remember him?? YEah that guy doing like 15+ years for running over some kids who he was just playing a football game with.

Vermeil is like Gibbs....They will be forever in your corner.

Vermeil is like from 3 coaches ago. Since then he has had HErm and Todd.

Posted by: 4thFloor | March 16, 2010 12:57 PM | Report abuse

Come meet Jason Campbell, Lorenzo Alexander, Kedric Golston, and the Washington Redskins Thursday March 25 from 6-10pm. Tickets are sold online, $45 Open Bar, come take pics, bring your jerseys to get signed, tickets are going fast! https://secure.acceptiva.com/?cst=2381f9

Posted by: timurdc | March 16, 2010 1:00 PM | Report abuse

Perfect storm. Rams get Bradford, no one wants to trade up for the pick, eesh.

Posted by: McMetal | March 16, 2010 12:44 PM | Report abuse
------------------

Then we take Eric Berry and target some beefcake in the 2nd round, where the pick value vs player ranking isn't so important.

Posted by: mattsoundworld | March 16, 2010 1:00 PM | Report abuse

Perfect storm. Rams get Bradford, no one wants to trade up for the pick, eesh.

Posted by: McMetal | March 16, 2010 12:44 PM |

If the draft goes like this, the Skins will have a shot at two of these three players, Suh, McCoy, Berry all of whom will address the need spot for the Skins. More importantly, Suh will likely be there at #4 (Bucs reportedly have McCoy rated higher) and would offer the ideal player for the Skins to use to trade back.

Posted by: TWISI | March 16, 2010 1:03 PM | Report abuse

Maybe this Johnson fellow can turn his life around.

Posted by: _Stumped_ | March 16, 2010 1:05 PM | Report abuse

Is that a testament to Johnsons strong wok wthic or a slap against Clintons aversion to the same?

Posted by: CheyenneWY | March 16, 2010 12:37 PM | Report abuse
There are a lot of misconceptions on this blog. One of them is that CP is lazy. I don't buy into that for one minute. Yes, during the season, because of the wear and tear on his body(due to 25+ carries per game), CP does like to give his body some rest. Yes, he has slowed down somewhat. But he is a real competitor, wants to be the Man, and will do anything to be the Man. This may be good for CP, to have someone push him. But I think the push will come from a draft selection or someone younger, not LJ. Hope I'm wrong about LJ, tho. That would be grat

Posted by: frediefritz | March 16, 2010 1:06 PM | Report abuse

The Lions have already had their 15-minute meeting with Okung at the combine and several members of the organization also had dinner with him.

Okung is a potential target because he would fill one nagging hole in the team's roster - left guard. If Okung is drafted, he would likely play left tackle with Jeff Backus moving inside. Okung, at 6-5 and 307 pounds, is an excellent pass protector while Backus is a better run blocker.

By the way, it's also possible that Okung could be Detroit's top target. Teams at the top of the board like to draft "position value'' players -- the positions that usually cost the most money to fill. Those include quarterback, left tackle and pass rushers.

Posted by: 4thFloor | March 16, 2010 12:09 PM | Report abuse

I'm not buying Okung to the Lions. Everything that I've read about these guys has said that Okung is very good, but that Suh and McCoy are clearly better. I don't doubt that teams like to draft "position value" players at the top of the draft, but I do doubt whether that trumps getting the best player available, especially when the differences between players are clear, and the best available fills more of a need. While Backus is a serviceable left tackle (certainly better than anyone the 'Skins have at the position!), the Lions defense was 25th against the rush and 29th in terms of numbers of sacks, and a lot of that has to go on their D-line. If guard is really the position on the O-line that they want to fill, they can do that in rounds 2 or 3, and not by taking a guy at 1 who isn't the best player available. If Bradford goes to the Rams at 1, I think that Okung will be there at 4 for the 'Skins. The question then becomes do they take Okung, or does Shanny think highly enough of Clausen to take him at 4.

Posted by: rbpalmer | March 16, 2010 1:08 PM | Report abuse

Suh, that huge Samoan guy and Haynesworth....hmmm.

Posted by: _Stumped_ | March 16, 2010 1:09 PM | Report abuse

Maybe this is what CP needs.

CP is too proud to let someone come in and take the starting job from him unless he was injured.

Maybe this and Shantheman will light a fire and he can get back to 2007 Portis.

Posted by: Rypien11 | March 16, 2010 1:10 PM | Report abuse

If the draft goes like this, the Skins will have a shot at two of these three players, Suh, McCoy, Berry all of whom will address the need spot for the Skins. More importantly, Suh will likely be there at #4 (Bucs reportedly have McCoy rated higher) and would offer the ideal player for the Skins to use to trade back.

Posted by: TWISI | March 16, 2010 1:03 PM | Report abuse

I agree, TWISI. I would love that scenario.

Posted by: frediefritz | March 16, 2010 1:11 PM | Report abuse

Perfect storm. Rams get Bradford, no one wants to trade up for the pick, eesh.

Posted by: McMetal | March 16, 2010 12:44 PM |

If the draft goes like this, the Skins will have a shot at two of these three players, Suh, McCoy, Berry all of whom will address the need spot for the Skins. More importantly, Suh will likely be there at #4 (Bucs reportedly have McCoy rated higher) and would offer the ideal player for the Skins to use to trade back.

Posted by: TWISI | March 16, 2010 1:03 PM

Sorry dude....We are at UTTER FAIL when this happens....Again let me show you 4th's Mock Draft which is only relevant to #4:

1. Bradford
2. Okung
3. McCoy
4. UTTER FAIL

We don't need Suh, Eric Berry, or a 2nd rated LT @ this value.

In the 2010 Draft, The Washington Redskins will select CJ Spiller.

Posted by: 4thFloor | March 16, 2010 1:11 PM | Report abuse

4thfloor

"Ganther went to Seattle with Stump Mitchel....Not to be confused with Stump from Portland"

My BAD?

Ganther is still listed on the team roster.

You say he's gone, but the team website says he's still here.

In any event, I'd still like to see a young'n get a shot at running back.

My choices?:

M Hardesty

B Tate

J Dwyer

Posted by: MistaMoe | March 16, 2010 1:13 PM | Report abuse

Wasn't it not that long ago that Vermiel called Johnson a sissy or something to that extent about missing practice time. Now he is the hardest working RB in the game, gimme a break.

Posted by: joeboggs | March 16, 2010 1:16 PM | Report abuse

Suh, that huge Samoan guy and Haynesworth....hmmm.

Posted by: _Stumped_ | March 16, 2010 1:09 PM | Report abuse
I get a little chubby just thinking about that!

Posted by: frediefritz | March 16, 2010 1:17 PM | Report abuse

We don't need Suh, Eric Berry, or a 2nd rated LT @ this value.

In the 2010 Draft, The Washington Redskins will select CJ Spiller.

Posted by: 4thFloor | March 16, 2010 1:11 PM | Report abuse

You clearly have not seen Suh or Berry play before have you. The redskins need them, at any value. No one is taking Spiller top 5.

Posted by: Stu27 | March 16, 2010 1:19 PM | Report abuse

Competition is a great motivator. Portis already got the memo though. Hopefully, this won't be the tired drama all season long. I could give a -uck who is the "starter" - they're going to be sharing carries. Having Portis in will indicate certain tendencies, same with LJ and Shanny can use that later in the season.

Posted by: BrooklynSkins | March 16, 2010 1:19 PM | Report abuse

I'm not buying Okung to the Lions. Everything that I've read about these guys has said that Okung is very good, but that Suh and McCoy are clearly better. I don't doubt that teams like to draft "position value" players at the top of the draft, but I do doubt whether that trumps getting the best player available, especially when the differences between players are clear, and the best available fills more of a need. While Backus is a serviceable left tackle (certainly better than anyone the 'Skins have at the position!), the Lions defense was 25th against the rush and 29th in terms of numbers of sacks, and a lot of that has to go on their D-line. If guard is really the position on the O-line that they want to fill, they can do that in rounds 2 or 3, and not by taking a guy at 1 who isn't the best player available. If Bradford goes to the Rams at 1, I think that Okung will be there at 4 for the 'Skins. The question then becomes do they take Okung, or does Shanny think highly enough of Clausen to take him at 4.

Posted by: rbpalmer | March 16, 2010 1:08 PM

http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2009/12/06/matthew-stafford-re-aggravates-injury/

Considering the state of the Lions' offensive line -- and defense, really -- one of their goals for this season with rookie quarterback Matthew Stafford should be to make it through the season with his body still intact. He's been battered all year long, and Sunday's 23-13 loss to Cincinnati was no different.

Late in the game, after letting go a pass, Stafford was banged down on his left shoulder -- which he had separated November 22 against the Browns. He was visibly in pain and had to leave the game.
.........................................
It's admirable that Stafford wants to keep going out and trying to improve with his still-rebuilding team, but let's be realistic here -- the Lions are now 2-10, and they have other areas of their team that need improvement. Stafford appears to be legitimate as their quarterback of the future. What possible good could come out of running him out there against the hard-hitting Ravens' defense next week?

If there's even a question as to the health of Stafford, the Lions should be careful and sit him. They are building toward the future, not playing for a few meaningless 2009 wins. "
====================================================

And you don't think they will draft Okung...

FYI - They (The Fans) think of BAckus how we thought about Jansen. Good Run Blocker, BAd Pass Protector.

The top 8 picks should ALWAYS be 'Position Value' Picks ALWAYS. It's too much $$ not to be.

And we will have ZERO position value picks once Bradford and Okung leave the board....

Posted by: 4thFloor | March 16, 2010 1:21 PM | Report abuse

Posted by: MistaMoe | March 16, 2010 1:13 PM

C'MON Moe-

The teams website still has Levi and Yoder on the roster. It's never updated.

Use this from now on:

http://www.hogshaven.com/roster

Sometimes when it's someone's job to cover a team it's just a job (RI, Redskins.com). Just look at us wasting countless hours daily on the Skins because we choose to...that's the same choice the fine people at HOGSHAVEN have made.

Posted by: Diesel44 | March 16, 2010 1:22 PM | Report abuse

Posted by: 4thFloor | March 16, 2010 1:11 PM

To be honest with you, I could see the Skins taking a RB with their 1st pick but not @ #4. Kyle's offense has a bunch of packages for a player with similar skills to Slaton; and Spiller is more talented than Slaton. However, if Bradford and Okung are off th board, there will be teams in the top ten clamoring to move up to draft them (arguably the best DT prospects in a decade). The Skins should trade back later in the top ten where they still have a shot at either Buluga,Williams,Buluga,Spiller and Clausen (if they must get a QB in this draft).

Posted by: TWISI | March 16, 2010 1:24 PM | Report abuse

Ganther is still listed on the team roster.

You say he's gone, but the team website says he's still here.

In any event, I'd still like to see a young'n get a shot at running back.

My choices?:

M Hardesty

B Tate

J Dwyer

Posted by: MistaMoe | March 16, 2010 1:13 PM | Report abuse

Hey Moe. Do you think if we get Okung at #4, we should use #37 on a rb? That's the only way we would get any of these guys, since we don't have a third(at least, not at the moment). I guess Tate could fall to our 4th round pick.

On Ganther, I heard he went to talk to Seattle, but I haven't heard that he was signed.

Posted by: frediefritz | March 16, 2010 1:25 PM | Report abuse

You clearly have not seen Suh or Berry play before have you. The redskins need them, at any value. No one is taking Spiller top 5.

Posted by: Stu27 | March 16, 2010 1:19 PM

I have. And have you seen the $41 Mil we have already commited to the DT position?

I def believe there will be a chance to draft Suh, but my $$ currently is on Spiller. QB @ #37. And a trade back into the top of the 2nd round to get the 6th - 8th best LT available.

Posted by: 4thFloor | March 16, 2010 1:26 PM | Report abuse

beeps

Posted by: TWISI | March 16, 2010 1:26 PM | Report abuse

* beep beep *

new post...

Posted by: NateinthePDX | March 16, 2010 1:26 PM | Report abuse

"Larry Johnson will work all week -- he'll work Wednesday, Thursday, Friday and Saturday -- and he'll make you start him on Sundays."

----------

Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't weeks have 7 days in them. I know they get days off, but Wednesday through Saturday doesn't really feel like "all week"

Posted by: Dorf | March 16, 2010 1:27 PM | Report abuse

beep beep

Posted by: frediefritz | March 16, 2010 1:29 PM | Report abuse

PORTIS IS A BEAST PLAIN AND SIMPLE..JOHNSON IS A BEAST PLAIN AND SIMPLE.. IF BOTH OF THESE GUYS GET BACK TO FORM...LOOKOUT LITTLE GIANTS, COWGIRLS, AND PENGEONS.

Posted by: taylormade218 | March 16, 2010 1:33 PM | Report abuse

PORTIS IS A BEAST PLAIN AND SIMPLE..JOHNSON IS A BEAST PLAIN AND SIMPLE.. IF BOTH OF THESE GUYS GET BACK TO FORM...LOOKOUT LITTLE GIANTS, COWGIRLS, AND PENGEONS.

Posted by: taylormade218 | March 16, 2010 1:33 PM | Report abuse

John Corcoran predicts the future at NFL Draft Dog

http://www.nfldraftdog.com/nfl-team-columns/washington-redskins.html

Why Shanahan would go QB, why MacLain makes sense, why Snyder's pilots are so freaking lonely....

Posted by: TheCork | March 16, 2010 1:42 PM | Report abuse

Dick Vermeil coached Larry Johnson 5 years ago. This Larry Johnson has 5 more years of wear on him. I don't see how he can predict anything about him.

Posted by: jmy999 | March 16, 2010 1:55 PM | Report abuse

I don't know who starts, but we're definitely in the running for the NFL All Loathesome backfield this season.

Posted by: zimbar | March 16, 2010 2:09 PM | Report abuse

THEY ARE BOTH TOO OLD!!!! The problem here is no young RB's have been drafted since Portis became BFF's with the owner. Let's look at the division's RB's with 50 or more carries and tell me if you see a pattern:

DALLAS: Barber (26), Jones (22), Choice (25) - average age 24, Y/R 4.99

PHILLY: McCoy (21), Weaver (27), Westbrook (30) - average age 26, Y/R 4.28

GIANTS: Jacobs (27), Bradshaw (23) - average age 25, Y/R 4.17

SKINS: Portis (28), Cartwright (30), Ganther (25), Betts (30) - average age 28, Y/R 3.70.

With all respect to LJ, all he does is make us older (turns 31 during the season) and slower (3.2 Y/R in 14 games last season).

At best he is a one year stopgap while we fix other deficiencies. But sometime in the next 14 months we must draft a young stud RB.

Posted by: jksesq1 | March 16, 2010 2:24 PM | Report abuse

If Bradford and Okung are not available at #4, and the Skins can't get anyone to trade with them, they should let the clock expire and slide-slide-slipity slide until they can grab the next rated tackle at a lower slot.

Posted by: coparker5 | March 16, 2010 2:26 PM | Report abuse

Don't know whether Vermeil is right or not... as both backs are getting on in years already... and some hungry young pup could probably unseat the both of them.

But I do look forward to hearing that LJ27 punched CP26 in the mouth... just because, just because.

Posted by: Vic1 | March 16, 2010 2:27 PM | Report abuse

Hey taylormade:

29 AND 31 YEAR OLD RUNNING BACKS DO NOT GET BACK TO FORM. EMMITT PEAKED AT 26. WALTER PAYTON HAD A GREAT YEAR AT 31 BUT TO QUOTE LLOYD BENTSEN, LJ AND CP ARE NO WALTER PAYTONS.

Posted by: jksesq1 | March 16, 2010 2:28 PM | Report abuse

This is a very good point. two things can happen.

1. Competition between the two LJ and CP will drive both to practice harder, get into better shape, and perform better on the field
2. Competition will reveal one or the other as an extra part that can be cut to make room for someone who offers more to the club.

Either way its a Win Win!

Posted by: Veretax | March 16, 2010 2:39 PM | Report abuse

I don't think he will unseat CP...that's not to say I don't hope he does. I just am not convinced LJ has much left... here's hoping he proves me wrong!

Posted by: cedric_lockhart | March 16, 2010 2:46 PM | Report abuse

Won't take much for a talented back in the way of work ethic and overall determination to unseat the primadonna of Washington football.

Posted by: dc1020008 | March 16, 2010 3:37 PM | Report abuse

This reminds me of the Riggo/George Rogers backfield of 1986.

Posted by: dc1020008 | March 16, 2010 3:41 PM | Report abuse

Did Dick Vermeil say whether Larry Johnson would bowl on shomer shabbos?

Posted by: isnadd | March 16, 2010 4:52 PM | Report abuse

If no top RB is drafted (nothing but OL should be drafted by Redskins in first four rounds this season anyways), I see no way Portis or Johnson loses job...Shann is a guy who likes to have his RB run for 2000 yards, but rarely uses them out of the backfield. He also wears RBs out early in their careers. I think he's learned from that and I'd expect to see both guys load-sharing with 200+ carries this season, especially given that both of them are nearing the ends of their careers.

Posted by: zickzack | March 16, 2010 5:07 PM | Report abuse

Claussen will be the pick....the rest will be history.


LJ is a back-up and short-yardage specialist, Shanahan will use both to his advantage.

Posted by: wewbank1 | March 16, 2010 5:22 PM | Report abuse

And J.R. you are no longer an objective reporter. You are subtly showing your distaste for Portis and we all see it. Why dont you tell Portis to his face why you wright these things and maybe he'll change your mind.

Posted by: wewbank1 | March 16, 2010 5:26 PM | Report abuse

Both Portis and Johnson are washed up, so this poll is a waste of time. Period. End of story.

This offense BADLY needs speed and explosive guys.

Posted by: SadieV | March 16, 2010 5:37 PM | Report abuse

Hope this comes true... Portis hasn't had any motivation to train in the off-season with Ladell Betts and Rock Cartright behind him in the depth chart.

I hope Portis is reading this too.

Posted by: dcsportsfan51 | March 16, 2010 5:50 PM | Report abuse

No question, the first thing I thought of when Johnson signed was that it would spell the end of Portis' career which was probably over before the concussion. of course we need some youngs legs to carry the load. BUT. In the mean time there was desperation to upgrade a positon that was essentially unfilled.

Posted by: keepdanshandsoff | March 16, 2010 6:21 PM | Report abuse

Neither are going anywhere until there's some solid o-line blocking.

Posted by: glawrence007 | March 16, 2010 10:31 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company