Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
On Twitter: RedskinsInsider and PostSports  |  Facebook  |  E-mail alerts: Redskins and Sports  |  RSS

Reaction of Redskins' players to Donovan McNabb trade is positive

Reaction from Redskins players to the team's trade for quarterback Donovan McNabb was overwhelmingly positive, according to Jason Reid.

"Obviously, it's very surprising," outside linebacker Lorenzo Alexander said. "You're talking about a guy who has been to the big game [Super Bowl XXXIX] and played in a lot of NFC championship games. He's done it for a long period of time, so he can't do anything but make your team better.
"I love Jason Campbell as a person and a player, but the front office wanted to go in a different direction. Who knows what other moves they'll make and where Jason will wind up, hopefully he'll be here, but he'll be successful wherever he is. But we all know what we signed up for being in the NFL."
That other trade with Philly worked out

Almost to the day 40 years ago, the Redskins made a trade for a Philly QB named Sonny Jurgensen. Dan Steinberg does some digging, in D.C. SportsBog. ... Brian Mitchell, who played with McNabb in Philly, hears enthusiasm in the voice of the Redskins' new QB -- and the desire to prove the Eagles wrong.

By Cindy Boren  |  April 4, 2010; 11:57 PM ET
Categories:  Donovan McNabb  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Donovan McNabb 'excited' about trade to Redskins
Next: What the McNabb trade means for Campbell

Comments

"I love Jason Campbell as a person and a player, but the front office wanted to go in a different direction. Who knows what other moves they'll make and where Jason will wind up, hopefully he'll be here, but he'll be successful wherever he is. But we all know what we signed up for being in the NFL."


Sweet. This is confirmation the other shoe is going to drop.

Posted by: SkinsfaninKaneohe | April 5, 2010 12:20 AM | Report abuse

maybe 1st 2nd or 3rd, but the first to say "McNabb faces uphill battle in Washington".

Posted by: skinsinsider101 | April 5, 2010 12:20 AM | Report abuse

i don't have a link, i heard paolantonio say it on espnews, DM blocked trades to both OAK and BUF before the deal was done.

Posted by: terrapin3 | April 5, 2010 12:23 AM | Report abuse

Best QB available at #4 was Donovan McNabb at #37.. And Skins still have their #4.
It was a Good Deal.

Posted by: SkinsneedaGM | April 5, 2010 12:23 AM | Report abuse

While I'm happy to share my opinion here...the opinions of the Redskins players quoted in this article tell you everything you need to know as to whether this was a good trade or not...

HTTR!

Posted by: dchandl3 | April 5, 2010 12:23 AM | Report abuse

Best QB available at #4 was Donovan McNabb at #37.. And Skins still have their #4.
It was a Good Deal.

Posted by: SkinsneedaGM | April 5, 2010 12:23 AM | Report abuse

Smartest comment yet regarding this trade.

Posted by: dchandl3 | April 5, 2010 12:25 AM | Report abuse

think about what the bears gave up for cutler compared to the mcnabb deal and this looks pretty good to me. cutler's younger but still, DM is a whole lot cheaper.

ok so we are probably trying to trade multiple players to recoup draft picks. who's it gonna be? and what's their realistic value?

idk about JC 'cause he hasn't even signed his tender. maybe carlos rogers? 4th round tops. coooooooley? 3rd i think.

what's up? whatchall think?

Posted by: terrapin3 | April 5, 2010 12:25 AM | Report abuse

i don't have a link, i heard paolantonio say it on espnews, DM blocked trades to both OAK and BUF before the deal was done.

Posted by: terrapin3 | April 5, 2010 12:23 AM | Report abuse


And that's confirmation he is not stupid.

Posted by: SkinsfaninKaneohe | April 5, 2010 12:26 AM | Report abuse

Posted by: Diesel44 | April 5, 2010 12:19 AM

That was Reid responding to what Schefter was saying, that McNabb chose the Redskins. You left out the update of that PFT post where Schefter said that McNabb was able to chose from the options available. Reid did this as a sign of respect to #5.

Posted by: Curzon417 | April 5, 2010 12:27 AM | Report abuse

this is a typical Redskins move... the fact that the Eagles were willing to trade McNabb to a team within the division SHOULD have made Allen and Shanahan pause about the whole deal and ask, "are we sure we really want this guy?"

I think I hear the Who song, won't get fooled again, "meet the new boss, same as the old boss..."


Posted by: joek443 | April 5, 2010 12:28 AM | Report abuse

How good is JC17 looking now by QB hungry teams such as Oakland and Buffalo?

Posted by: flyinggoose1 | April 5, 2010 12:07 AM
----------------
not as good as 2 days ago before Shanny Sr and Jr made a statement of "no confidence" in JC by trading for McNabb, based on JC's film alone, not even a preseason evaluation.

Skins need alot of picks in the deepest draft in 20 years... and now only have 3 (I think?). 1st 4th and 5th??
I hope Allen goes trade nuts and back-fills (replaces) those lost picks.

Posted by: SkinsneedaGM | April 5, 2010 12:28 AM | Report abuse

"I love Jason Campbell as a person and a player, but the front office wanted to go in a different direction. Who knows what other moves they'll make and where Jason will wind up, hopefully he'll be here, but he'll be successful wherever he is. But we all know what we signed up for being in the NFL."


Sweet. This is confirmation the other shoe is going to drop.

Posted by: SkinsfaninKaneohe

And what, pray tell, is this confirmation of? I am positive the Skins FO does not share with Lorenzo what they plan to do....nor did Lorenzo make any statement to that degree.

Posted by: Lisa_R | April 5, 2010 12:30 AM | Report abuse

this is a typical Redskins move... the fact that the Eagles were willing to trade McNabb to a team within the division SHOULD have made Allen and Shanahan pause about the whole deal and ask, "are we sure we really want this guy?"

I think I hear the Who song, won't get fooled again, "meet the new boss, same as the old boss..."


Posted by: joek443 | April 5, 2010 12:28 AM | Report abuse

Didn't you already post this BS?????

Posted by: leevi98 | April 5, 2010 12:31 AM | Report abuse

Dayum, i just read JReid's article re player reaction (Good job btw).

JC is SOOOOOOOO on the block. And all the comments were much much much less than complimentary. Wow.

Posted by: SkinsfaninKaneohe | April 5, 2010 12:32 AM | Report abuse

I disagree, JoeK.

McNabb is not done...far from it...Why do you think QBs last longer today than they did so many years ago? Why do you think Kurt Warner was able to do what he did at 37 and 38 years old? The answer lies in the fact that the rules PROTECT QBs so they can play longer. So, as long as the Skins lock McNabb up to a long-term deal, trade Campbell to recoup a (hopefully decent) draft pick, I don't see how this is a bad deal whatsoever.

Posted by: Grover_Cleveland_80 | April 5, 2010 12:32 AM | Report abuse

Posted by: Curzon417 | April 5, 2010 12:27 AM

I left it out unintentionally..

Reid owes his long-term employment to McNabb but I'm still not buying it. I can't see Reid doing any favors that could end up costing him his job.

I hope I'm wrong but this is more than the Eagles were hoping to get and we widened the talent gap between us and the Eagles.

Posted by: Diesel44 | April 5, 2010 12:33 AM | Report abuse

First to say... POINT BLANK!... One thing is going to be certain! The skins will FINALLY have a PRO NFL Offense finally.. its been like a DECADE or more...... Thats one thing that will be a fact!.. The rest we will just have to wait and see..

Posted by: cocodc1 | April 5, 2010 12:35 AM | Report abuse

McNabb faces uphill battle in Washington

Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on April 5, 2010 12:03 AM ET

A large contingent of Eagles fans have waited for Donovan McNabb to be traded for years.

Now that the day has arrived, many of those same fans are convinced that trading McNabb within the NFC East will come back to haunt the franchise.

So McNabb wasn't good enough for a primed young offense, but he can resurrect a 4-12 team with a terrible offensive line?

There are three major advantages to Washington for McNabb. One is the contract he will probably sign. The other two have the last name of Shanahan.

After that, the Redskins are a major downgrade.

Mike and Kyle Shanahan know how to maximize a mobile quarterback, but McNabb is going to have to adjust to a new team and system for the first time in his career. (Yes, we're aware the schemes won't be too different.)

Washington's wide receivers are below average as a whole. The running backs were awesome in 2006. Most importantly, Washington's offensive line is porous.

(McNabb's back-to-efforts against the Cowboys shows what happens when he gets no protection. Like any quarterback.)

Mike Shanahan can coach up his team, but how quick will the transition be? McNabb only has so many prime years left, and this trade indicates the Eagles think his prime is over.

Make no mistake: This is a win-now move by the Redskins. The bar is raised. Anything less than a playoff appearance would be a disappointment. We trust Shanahan and G.M. Bruce Allen far more than Vinny Cerrato, but ignoring the future in an effort to win now is a recurring them in Washington.

That approach hasn't resulted in a lot of winning.

Posted by: Diesel44 | April 5, 2010 12:36 AM | Report abuse

Lisa, don't try so hard to prove your ignorance of all things requiring analytical thinking and application of logic.

The boys know.

Posted by: SkinsfaninKaneohe | April 5, 2010 12:36 AM | Report abuse

Posted by: leevi98 | April 5, 2010 12:38 AM | Report abuse

trade down, get more pics. OR hopefully get okung with #4 and then trade JC17 for a 3rd and 7th rounder? i say cambpell ends up in buffalo. they're stupid enough to make a trade.

Posted by: BMACattack | April 5, 2010 12:38 AM | Report abuse

I hope I'm wrong but this is more than the Eagles were hoping to get and we widened the talent gap between us and the Eagles.

Posted by: Diesel44 | April 5, 2010 12:33 AM

I agree with this, but am hoping that with MS having last year off to study the players that are coming out this year that he may find some Undrafted FAs. Gotta be glass half full type of fan at this point in the offseason.

Posted by: Curzon417 | April 5, 2010 12:39 AM | Report abuse

It'll be interesting to see what the Iggles get with that #37 pick.

I think Shanahan showed his cards for the draft, the only move that makes sense is Okung.

Posted by: Alan4 | April 5, 2010 12:41 AM | Report abuse

After being told last month that the Eagles would not deal him to NFC East-rival Washington, McNabb essentially forced Philadelphia’s hand by refusing to talk with any of the other teams that had expressed interest in recent weeks. In the process, McNabb can now take out his simmering anger on the Eagles’ front office that essentially forced him out of a city where he had played his entire career.


http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=jc-mcnabbtrade040410

Posted by: anacostia85 | April 5, 2010 12:42 AM | Report abuse

The reason that the Eagles were comfortable trading within the division is because they believe that McNabb is not a piece to put the Reskins over the top (i.e. too many other holes to fill). They might be right. At the time of this writing, they are not a playoff team (even with McNabb). Period. To change this will depend on how quickly Shanahan can build a team.

Posted by: Grover_Cleveland_80 | April 5, 2010 12:43 AM | Report abuse

The aftershock of this trade will have a huge affect on 92, 30, & 17.

We offered Haynesworth and Landy and the Eagles said, "No Thanks".

JC will now be traded for what...a 4th.

After a very quiet offseason we are now headed for an interesting 17 days until the draft.

Posted by: Diesel44 | April 5, 2010 12:44 AM | Report abuse

Why the hell does soo many think they screwing up their future by making this trade???? That is just stupid...

so what people are saying then is this...The Skins just blew their future because they don't have their second round pick and possibly 3rd in next years draft.

WOW what ever will the team do for the next decade???? LOL PLEASE....they are not done..they will most likely get that #2 back very soon in a trade...if not oh well...taking Mcnabb at # 37 in the 1st...what a steal!

Also by the time they reach next years draft...pretty sure they will get that 3rd round pick back at some point...maybe even this year...

Bottom line...they said they have a plan...we are just in the beginning of the plan.....I trust

HAIL NATION!

Posted by: leevi98 | April 5, 2010 12:44 AM | Report abuse

Alan, I think this increases the chance of a trade back.

There are lots more moves still to be made...

JC is going somewhere for a second or a third.

Posted by: SkinsfaninKaneohe | April 5, 2010 12:44 AM | Report abuse


Eagles rolling the dice
Posted on: April 4, 2010 11:39 pm
Edited on: April 4, 2010 11:49 pm
Score: 164
Log-in to rate:

* Log-in to rate:

* Log-in to rate:

The Washington Redskins have a real quarterback.

Do the Philadelphia Eagles?

As word trickled in Sunday that the Eagles had traded quarterback Donovan McNabb, I was lost in a food poison stupor.

I wasn't sure if I was hallucinating.

The Redskins? From the same division?

That's how desperate the Eagles were to find a trade partner, receiving a second-round pick from the Redskins in this year's draft and another draft pick -- third- or fourth-round pick -- in next year's draft.

As one personnel man told me last week, "They don't have a lot going for him."

So they settled. The Redskins had a big hole at quarterback to fill. The Eagles might still have one.

They love Kevin Kolb. And I do as well.

But let's be real. His track record grade is still incomplete.

Andy Reid is betting a lot on Kolb.

He better hope this one doesn't backfire. Kolb or McNabb next season goes to McNabb.

The Eagles better hope Kolb for the long run is what they expect him to be.

If not, can you imagine Philadelphia talk radio next year? by Prisco

Posted by: anacostia85 | April 5, 2010 12:44 AM | Report abuse

The reason that the Eagles were comfortable trading within the division is because they believe that McNabb is not a piece to put the Reskins over the top (i.e. too many other holes to fill). They might be right. At the time of this writing, they are not a playoff team (even with McNabb). Period. To change this will depend on how quickly Shanahan can build a team.

Posted by: Grover_Cleveland_80 | April 5, 2010 12:43 AM | Report abuse

i did not realize the off season was over with this trade....i do believe they have a lot more time to do more....let's let this all play out before we judge

Posted by: leevi98 | April 5, 2010 12:46 AM | Report abuse

The aftershock of this trade will have a huge affect on 92, 30, & 17.

We offered Haynesworth and Landy and the Eagles said, "No Thanks".

JC will now be traded for what...a 4th.

After a very quiet offseason we are now headed for an interesting 17 days until the draft.

Posted by: Diesel44 | April 5, 2010 12:44 AM

so what's the plan, stan? who's getting traded and for what, do you think? like, in the real world. JC=4th, i think carlos rogers=4th as well, who else?

Posted by: terrapin3 | April 5, 2010 12:47 AM | Report abuse

congrats 4th! i just read the rumor post and i would've been right there with you had i been paying any attention. and you and i see eye to eye about jason reid as well. i'm not a mcnaab guy, never have been but he is a HUGE upgrade to what we got right now.

also if shanny can get a 5th rounder for jason campbell i'll consider him a decent GM anything higher, he is either god or the devil!

the funniest or saddest thing about jc supporters is that they STILL don't get it. STILL????!!!! what will it take? for you to believe that he's not an nfl caliber QB? and i'm HOPING, HOPING, that there are actual GM's out there in need of a QB that think like you guys and can give the skins a 4th or a 3rd. but if they did they wouldn't have a job soon after.

btw if you guys have some time you should go read the rumors post....the comments are (now) hillarious. especially jason reid's about how he doesn't see shanny going for this cuz dNab isn't his type of qb....WTF...now i know why i don't come here no more...(in the off season)...wow just wow! thanks for keeping him straight 4th...

peace!

Posted by: dealer1 | April 5, 2010 12:47 AM | Report abuse

Lisa, don't try so hard to prove your ignorance of all things requiring analytical thinking and application of logic.

The boys know.

Posted by: SkinsfaninKaneohe

Speak for yourself.

Posted by: Lisa_R | April 5, 2010 12:48 AM | Report abuse

27 hours ago Lisa_R wrote with a response from 4thFloor who predicts the Deal 26 hours before it is announced..

4th.. I bow down to you.. please pick my stocks tomorrow..
=================

ComcastSportsnet (CSN) just shot this rumor down. They actually have inside access to the Redskins. CSN reported the Redskins told them they HAVE NOT made inquiries about McNabb and that the Eagles would never trade him to a division rival anyway.

Posted by: Lisa_R | April 3, 2010 7:22 PM


1. CSN is the REdskins...Theyll pimp whateva the Skins give Them. So, now I thinks it may be truer...

2. The Eagls traded a future HOF to us before....Why not again??

Posted by: 4thFloor | April 3, 2010 8:11 PM
=================

Posted by: SkinsneedaGM | April 5, 2010 12:51 AM | Report abuse

Look at it this way -- In short order this team's gone from Cerrato/Zorn/Campbell to
Allen/Shanahan/McNabb. How can that not be a positive?

Posted by: bones21 | April 5, 2010 12:51 AM | Report abuse


The reason that the Eagles were comfortable trading within the division is because they believe that McNabb is not a piece to put the Reskins over the top (i.e. too many other holes to fill). They might be right. At the time of this writing, they are not a playoff team (even with McNabb). Period. To change this will depend on how quickly Shanahan can build a team.

Posted by: Grover_Cleveland_80 | April 5, 2010 12:43 AM | Report abuse

i did not realize the off season was over with this trade....i do believe they have a lot more time to do more....let's let this all play out before we judge

Posted by: leevi98 | April 5, 2010 12:46 AM | Report abuse


Precisely why I stated "At the time of this writing." This implies that there are more trades to made, including an inevitable trade that sends Campbell elsewhere...

Posted by: Grover_Cleveland_80 | April 5, 2010 12:51 AM | Report abuse

Lisa, don't try so hard to prove your ignorance of all things requiring analytical thinking and application of logic.

The boys know.

Posted by: SkinsfaninKaneohe

Speak for yourself.

Posted by: Lisa_R | April 5, 2010 12:48 AM | Report abuse

I am.

Posted by: SkinsfaninKaneohe | April 5, 2010 12:58 AM | Report abuse

Look at it this way -- In short order this team's gone from Cerrato/Zorn/Campbell to
Allen/Shanahan/McNabb. How can that not be a positive?

Posted by: bones21 | April 5, 2010 12:51 AM

indeed. co-sign.

Posted by: terrapin3 | April 5, 2010 1:00 AM | Report abuse

so what's the plan, stan? who's getting traded and for what, do you think? like, in the real world. JC=4th, i think carlos rogers=4th as well, who else?

Posted by: terrapin3 | April 5, 2010 12:47 AM

Not sure I believe there is a "real world" trade scenario anymore...We just traded for the Eagles franchise leader is every statistical category and they apparently weren't at all apprehensive about sending him our way.

I can remember two times we were on the better end of a trade…
Jay Schroeder for Jim Lachey
Mike Oliphant for Earnest Byner

Our cup isn’t exactly running over with highly desired trading commodities and we’d be lucky to get 20 cents on the dollar for guys like 17, 22, 99, 92, & 30.

Posted by: Diesel44 | April 5, 2010 1:00 AM | Report abuse

Alan, I think this increases the chance of a trade back.

There are lots more moves still to be made...

JC is going somewhere for a second or a third.

Posted by: SkinsfaninKaneohe | April 5, 2010 12:44 AM
==========================
This recent McNabb deal, ironically, set the Bar for where JC will be valued. He has never been near Pro-Bowl caliber like McNabb. His only potential is 4 years NFL starting experience and a relatively young age. Allen will be lucky to get a 3rd for JC..most likely a 4th in this year's deep quality draft. If its a 2011 pick..it will be a conditional pick (3rd or 4th) depending on JC's performance.

Posted by: SkinsneedaGM | April 5, 2010 1:03 AM | Report abuse


Precisely why I stated "At the time of this writing." This implies that there are more trades to made, including an inevitable trade that sends Campbell elsewhere...

Posted by: Grover_Cleveland_80 | April 5, 2010 12:51 AM
=================
Could be fun to watch Okung protecting McNabb's blind side in 2010. Something McNabb was seriously lacking in PHilly.

Posted by: SkinsneedaGM | April 5, 2010 1:07 AM | Report abuse

so what's the plan, stan? who's getting traded and for what, do you think? like, in the real world. JC=4th, i think carlos rogers=4th as well, who else?

Posted by: terrapin3 | April 5, 2010 12:47 AM

Not sure I believe there is a "real world" trade scenario anymore...We just traded for the Eagles franchise leader is every statistical category and they apparently weren't at all apprehensive about sending him our way.

I can remember two times we were on the better end of a trade…
Jay Schroeder for Jim Lachey
Mike Oliphant for Earnest Byner

Our cup isn’t exactly running over with highly desired trading commodities and we’d be lucky to get 20 cents on the dollar for guys like 17, 22, 99, 92, & 30.


Posted by: Diesel44 | April 5, 2010 1:00 AM

harsh but true i think.

in the deepest draft in years, hopefully shanahan and allen will be able to parlay even extra 4th-7th rounders into quality depth and potential starters.

Posted by: terrapin3 | April 5, 2010 1:10 AM | Report abuse

Precisely why I stated "At the time of this writing." This implies that there are more trades to made, including an inevitable trade that sends Campbell elsewhere...

Posted by: Grover_Cleveland_80 | April 5, 2010 12:51 AM
=================
Could be fun to watch Okung protecting McNabb's blind side in 2010. Something McNabb was seriously lacking in PHilly.

Posted by: SkinsneedaGM | April 5, 2010 1:07 AM | Report abuse


Indeed. Okung has great feet and quickness. I also hope we take him at 1:4. As they say, other than the QB, the second-most important guy on the team is the LT, and Okung is a fine LT.

Posted by: Grover_Cleveland_80 | April 5, 2010 1:11 AM | Report abuse

This recent McNabb deal, ironically, set the Bar for where JC will be valued. He has never been near Pro-Bowl caliber like McNabb. His only potential is 4 years NFL starting experience and a relatively young age. Allen will be lucky to get a 3rd for JC..most likely a 4th in this year's deep quality draft. If its a 2011 pick..it will be a conditional pick (3rd or 4th) depending on JC's performance.

Posted by: SkinsneedaGM | April 5, 2010 1:03 AM

there's a first for everything...i agree 100% with snagm's post.

Posted by: terrapin3 | April 5, 2010 1:12 AM | Report abuse

As if going 4-12 wasn't a kick in the balls enough.. now this choking a$$ looser is on our team. WTF!!!

Posted by: gawnpostal | April 5, 2010 1:14 AM | Report abuse

beep beep

Posted by: Curzon417 | April 5, 2010 1:17 AM | Report abuse

Mike Oliphant for Earnest Byner

posted by diesel44

man, i still get a kick out of that trade.

Posted by: terrapin3 | April 5, 2010 1:17 AM | Report abuse

You want to know my reaction. Here it was. I was sitting at the local bar and I seen the announcement displayed on TV. I immediately lost my appetite through my wings and napkin down, ordered a shots and beers and began to look up to the ceiling!

Posted by: gawnpostal | April 5, 2010 1:28 AM | Report abuse

Look at it this way -- In short order this team's gone from Cerrato/Zorn/Campbell to
Allen/Shanahan/McNabb. How can that not be a positive?

Posted by: bones21 | April 5, 2010 12:51 AM

Feel free to add in the offensive coordinator(s)/signal caller(s) and it looks better.

Posted by: Keiser | April 5, 2010 1:31 AM | Report abuse

The logic that some the haters use is totally idiotic.

They claim the value for Campbell in a trade went down because the Redskins "showed no confidence" in him by getting McNabb. By the same analogy, the Eagles would have brought down the value of McNabb by willing to trade him!!!

Anytime a player is traded, the team is willing to part with him. You don't have to be an idiotic Redskin-hater to know that.

Campbell will get a trade in value based on his own attributes and performance, not based on the love that Shanahan has for him.

Posted by: Peaceful2009 | April 5, 2010 1:32 AM | Report abuse

All was quiet. Not a stir in the house. The skins looked to be going the right direction, and then.....

Posted by: gawnpostal | April 5, 2010 1:32 AM | Report abuse

Dang i am a loyal fan. I was just getting over the fact of a bad season. NOW THIS. NO NO NO NO O NO. I hate this!!! NOPE.. NO SIR. NO THANKS>

Posted by: gawnpostal | April 5, 2010 1:40 AM | Report abuse

DO you know how many times I have dogged Eagles fans because of this guy.. And they have actually agreed with me. Jack Kent Cook would be turning over in his grave. OK that is a little far fetched but you get the point/

Posted by: gawnpostal | April 5, 2010 1:46 AM | Report abuse

When and if we ever do make it to the playoffs and this guys blows it like he always does. Don't be mad. Expect it. At the least I would rather have a guy that still has potential, rather than a proven LOOSER.

Posted by: gawnpostal | April 5, 2010 1:51 AM | Report abuse

MCNABB=PROVEN LOOSER

Posted by: gawnpostal | April 5, 2010 1:52 AM | Report abuse

Now's the time to bring in Sharper or Hamlin at FS. No trades are needed and it would be an upgrade. Wouldn't surprise me to see one of them signed some time this week.

Don't trade ANYone else (except Campbell to get another semi-decent pick this year).

Diesel44, where did you hear that A) 92 was offered up to the Eagles and B) they turned him down? I need to follow your sources and JReid does, too, apparently.

Thanks

Posted by: DC2AZ99 | April 5, 2010 2:21 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company