Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
On Twitter: RedskinsInsider and PostSports  |  Facebook  |  E-mail alerts: Redskins and Sports  |  RSS
Posted at 10:43 PM ET, 12/ 2/2010

Jon Embree has not yet finalized deal to coach Colorado

By Jason Reid

Redskins tight end coach Jon Embree has not finalized a contract to become the next head coach at the University of Colorado, a person familiar with the situation said late Thursday night.

Although Embree, in his first season with the Redskins, is in talks with the school about accepting the position, a report of a deal being completed Thursday were "premature," the source said. Embree is expected to sign a contract to assume control of the program at his alma mater, possibly as early as next week, but anything could happen until the process is completed.

Last season, former Redskins secondary coach Jerry Gray was reportedly hired as head coach at Memphis. But complications arose and he was not offered the job.

Coach Mike Shanahan did not retain Gray on his first Redskins staff. Gray was hired by the Seattle Seahawks as an assistant.

Embree plans to travel with the Redskins to face the New York Giants on Sunday at New Meadowlands Stadium, the source said.

By Jason Reid  | December 2, 2010; 10:43 PM ET
 
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Did Portis come back too soon?
Next: Roster analysis: LaRon Landry gets a pay raise

Comments

http://blog.afroconservative.com/2009/10/01/liberal-democrats-destroyed-black-america-who-wants-next.aspx

.......

In the wake of Derrion Albert's death, I find myself increasingly disillusioned by the current state of Black America. While African Americans comprise 13.5 percent of the population, 43 percent of all murder victims in 2007 were African America. Of the 43 percent who were murdered, 93.1 percent were killed by African Americans. Was it always like this? The answer is Unequivocally: NO. The disproportionate crime rates, illegitimacy rates, divorce rates, drugs abuse, and disproportionate incarceration rates didn't begin until liberals took over the Black Community in the 60s. Before liberals came and negated the influence of the Black father, over 80 percent of black children in 1960 were born in wedlock. In 1940 the illegitimacy rate amongst Blacks was 19 percent. Today, post the liberals monopoly in the poor urban areas, the illegitimacy rate is over 70 percent and almost 90 percent in the inner city. Surprisingly, between 1890 and 1940 Blacks had a marriage rate slightly higher than Whites. According toHerbert G. Gutman author of "The Black Family in Slavery and Freedom (1750-1925)"--for every 6 children under the age of under the of 6-5 of them lived in two parent households. In Harlem between 1905 and 1925, only 3 percent of all families were headed by a woman under 30. In this same time period, 85 percent of black children lived in two-parent families. The training ground for any human being begins in the home. The dynamics of the home environment can do two things: it can set the child up for failure or for success. When Patrick Moynihan, a Democrat began seeing the negative trends of entitlement programs regarding the Black Family in the 60s he wrote the "Moynihan Report". In the "Moynihan Report" he predicted that if the Black family continued to disintegrate, then there would be issues of delinquency, crime, disproportional educational outcomes, and other social problems that come when a father isn't active in a child's life.

.......

Can anybody post a link that disproves this propaganda?

Posted by: Debaitor | December 2, 2010 11:08 PM | Report abuse

Until they cast off their Democrat "masters" - Black people will never be truly free.

Posted by: Debaitor | December 2, 2010 11:09 PM | Report abuse

One more thing...

Why in the face of overwhelming evidence do they continue to ignore it?

Then get mad when people like me try to correct their "ignore"ance?

Posted by: Debaitor | December 2, 2010 11:13 PM | Report abuse

Posted by: Debaitor | December 2, 2010 11:15 PM | Report abuse

How come states that vote democrat typically have a wider income gap between the rich and the poor than states that vote republican?

Why are democrats trying to eliminate the middle class?

Why do democrats hate business owners who at the very least provide jobs or healthcare or etc. yet they love vain entertainers who only care about themselves?

Why are democrats so lazy? Just google income gaps for states.

Then look at how the state votes.

It's actually quite simple to figure out that states who vote democrat have a wider income gap than states that vote republican.

Washington DC and New York obviously top the list.

And they are as liberal as it gets

Posted by: Debaitor | December 2, 2010 11:17 PM | Report abuse

Who creates jobs?

The government?
Poor people?

Posted by: Debaitor | December 2, 2010 11:22 PM | Report abuse

How are you going to feel in ten years when anyone earning over $50K is considered rich?

Will this be evidence that we've officially settled in liberal nirvana?

Posted by: Debaitor | December 2, 2010 11:23 PM | Report abuse

Put me in the minority then. I think he gives as good as he takes.

There is only a select few that are truly grating.

Posted by: Diesel44 | December 2, 2010 11:25 PM |

I actually like beeps. Something about tonight is not sitting well with me though...probably has nothing to do with beeps. He is definitely less grating than some.

Posted by: scampbell1975 | December 2, 2010 11:34 PM | Report abuse

Put me in the minority then. I think he gives as good as he takes.

There is only a select few that are truly grating.

Posted by: Diesel44 | December 2, 2010 11:25 PM |

I actually like beeps. Something about tonight is not sitting well with me though...probably has nothing to do with beeps. He is definitely less grating than some.

Posted by: scampbell1975 | December 2, 2010 11:34 PM |

It's a blog and every one has a voice, except when they carry it too far and then they are gone. Just like free speech until someone yells "fire" in a crowded theater or the air we breathe until someone farts in a crowded elevator.

Posted by: DLoad | December 3, 2010 12:02 AM | Report abuse

Put me in the minority then. I think he gives as good as he takes.

There is only a select few that are truly grating.

Posted by: Diesel44 | December 2, 2010 11:25 PM |

I actually like beeps. Something about tonight is not sitting well with me though...probably has nothing to do with beeps. He is definitely less grating than some.

Posted by: scampbell1975 | December 2, 2010 11:34 PM |

It's a blog and every one has a voice, except when they carry it too far and then they are gone. Just like free speech until someone yells "fire" in a crowded theater or the air we breathe until someone farts in a crowded elevator.

Posted by: DLoad | December 3, 2010 12:02 AM | Report abuse

Can anybody post a link that disproves this propaganda?

Posted by: Debaitor

You have posted the unsupported rantings of right wing propagandist who cheerfully refers to himself as a Republican all the way, and then have the Chutzpah to challenge us to disprove it?

You can't disprove that which is unprovable in the first place. You are silly to assume what this man has posted is anything but the fevered rantings of his own prejudices.

really, can't youfind a better board to poist your wackaloon ideas and to find wackaloons of the opposite stripe to argue with you.

Here, you're just a big bore.

Yeah, sure Black problems started when the Libs took over. And trickle down economics is fair.

Posted by: TheCork | December 3, 2010 2:36 AM | Report abuse

And this discussion is relevant to the Redskins.....because?

Posted by: Tiffany010 | December 3, 2010 8:45 AM | Report abuse

The quick answer to Mr. Debaitor's question is:
Nixon

The Great Society was to establish an infratructure of institutions to provide the needed opportunities for the poor & disenfranchised--both black & white--to access the resources needed for slef-improvement.
Nixon's policies demolished those programs in favor of straight cash payments. That economic team believed if you gave the poor more cash they would spend it in their own self-interest and everything would improve. (Gee, that sounds familiar.)

If you are familiar with Gingrich's "block grant" fantasies, here is where they originiated.

OK?

You may go back to your regularly scheduled prejudices.

Posted by: afreeman3 | December 3, 2010 9:12 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company