Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
On Twitter: RedskinsInsider and PostSports  |  Facebook  |  E-mail alerts: Redskins and Sports  |  RSS

Montgomery to Have Knee Surgery

Jason La Canfora reports:

Defensive tackle Anthony Montgomery said he will undergo surgery soon on his left knee. "I'll get it 'scoped either this week or next week," Montgomery said. He has not decided whether to have surgery here or to have it performed by Dr. James Andrews in Birmingham, Ala.

By Cindy Boren  |  December 29, 2008; 12:40 PM ET
 
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Campbell on the Offense
Next: Clinton Being Clinton

Comments

If we scope Vinny's knee can he be out for this offseason?

Posted by: NFeKPo | December 29, 2008 12:48 PM | Report abuse

Montgomery is an ok player IMO. Good against the run, but not much else.

He's definitely not an anchor to the line. We need to upgrade his postion or at least the guy next to him.

Posted by: Predator48 | December 29, 2008 12:49 PM | Report abuse

Was CP healthy at the end of either season? Could he have used FEWER carries??

Posted by: BeantownGreg | December 29, 2008 12:39 PM

And that's where MArcus Mason comes in. That's on Vinny and Greg to a lessor extent (trying to lighten the mood).....

Posted by: DaReal4th | December 29, 2008 12:50 PM | Report abuse

Greg....He did it ONE TIME. TWO YEARS AGO. What has he done since then? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

If that's the case...somebody give Tatum Bell a starting job. One good year doesn't make him worth starting

Posted by: SDMDTSU | December 29, 2008 12:45 PM |

No one is arguing he should be a starter we said he should get more carries to spell Portis, so Portis would not be tired at the end of the year. if you did'nt notice I'm yelling!

This is a dumb f-ing argument move on with your life.

Posted by: Flounder21 | December 29, 2008 12:50 PM | Report abuse

I didn't point to it as the sole reason. I pointed to it because it was a critical play on that drive, and it was a relatively easy, head-on tackle that any player should be expected to make. He whiffed.

Posted by: psps23 | December 29, 2008 12:40 PM

Similar to CR22 dropping passes that hit both hands?

Posted by: DaReal4th | December 29, 2008 12:51 PM | Report abuse

And that's where MArcus Mason comes in. That's on Vinny and Greg to a lessor extent (trying to lighten the mood).....

This doesn't make any sense, though.

What reason do you have to think that Mason would be better than Betts?

He couldn't make this team, then he couldn't make the Ravens, then he couldn't make the Jets -- The JETS!!!

I swear you people put way too much stock in pre-season games and how these donks do against moonlighting UPS drivers.

Posted by: VTDuffman | December 29, 2008 12:52 PM | Report abuse

So, lh, if I'm not mistaken, betts rushed for over 1000 yards in fewer than 10 games when he was starting. The only time he started in his career, he put up great numbers, but the film shows that he did this with smoke and mirrors?? Or, was he able to will himself invisible....

Posted by: BeantownGreg | December 29, 2008 12:42 PM

The film may show that a 3 yd carry could have been a 15 yd carry if he had better hole recognition. The film may show that a 10 yd carry could have been a 30 yd carry if he had better vision. The film would definitely show that if he had some speed a his career long of 27 yds could have been a 50 yd TD scamper.

Posted by: learnedhand1 | December 29, 2008 12:54 PM | Report abuse

Zorn just definitively stated that JC will be the QB next year. It does not sound like "wholesale changes" are on the way.

Unless Zorn is completely out of the loop I think we are going to be looking at a very similar team next season.

Posted by: Soup17 | December 29, 2008 12:54 PM | Report abuse

This just tells me that CP26 dosen't want to be a leader of the team. THat's OK. He dosn't have to be...........

Is that really OK to you? Why?

Posted by: VTDuffman | December 29, 2008 12:48 PM

Because he shows up to each and every game willing to sacrafice. And we really don't have a choice one way or the other because he is locked up for 2 more years.

Plus, CP26 has never been politically correct, but look at these other teamates with losing attitudes and you tell me which one is worse? CP just wears his heart on his sleeves and I can relate as to I do the same and I regret alot of things I have spoken up for or against...

CR22 has demostrated the biggest loser's attitude so far. Competition is supposed to bring out the best of you.......

Posted by: DaReal4th | December 29, 2008 12:56 PM | Report abuse

Marcus Mason has 0 carries for 0 yards in a real NFL game, but sure he would probably be way better then Betts, because he is secretly SuperMan.

This is just dumb so please lets change the subject.

Posted by: Flounder21 | December 29, 2008 12:56 PM | Report abuse

How busy must James Andrews be? Does he do every major athlete in the country?

Posted by: Rypien11 | December 29, 2008 12:57 PM | Report abuse

Not if they beef up the lines.

Posted by: columbiard | December 29, 2008 12:57 PM | Report abuse

Zorn just definitively stated that JC will be the QB next year. It does not sound like "wholesale changes" are on the way.

Unless Zorn is completely out of the loop I think we are going to be looking at a very similar team next season.

Posted by: Soup17 | December 29, 2008 12:54 PM


Somebody needs to ask if James Thrash will be back next year.

That way I'll know whether or not to load up on barf bags.

Posted by: Predator48 | December 29, 2008 12:58 PM | Report abuse

Zorn just definitively stated that JC will be the QB next year. It does not sound like "wholesale changes" are on the way.

Unless Zorn is completely out of the loop I think we are going to be looking at a very similar team next season.

Posted by: Soup17 | December 29, 2008 12:54 PM |

Zorn is out of the loop, and I'm sure he does'nt want to make comments regarding there off-season plan even if he does no what it is.

Posted by: Flounder21 | December 29, 2008 12:58 PM | Report abuse

lh, will the film also show that he rushed for over 1000 yards in 8 games, or does that not show up?? I'm thinking that somehow in those games he started he hit the right hole to go over 1000 yards, but keep fighting your fight......

I'm moving on

Posted by: BeantownGreg | December 29, 2008 12:59 PM | Report abuse

"How do you figure?

1) What stats do you use to evaluate a back-up RB?
2) Where does Betts land in a list of those stats?"

My definition of a good backup is different from what you described above. I expect a backup RB to be explosive with limited touches, and able to make plays with limited touches.

I'll give you two more: Ahmad Bradshaw and Darren Sproles.

Ladell Betts - 61 attempts, 3.4 YPC, 1 TD, 22 rec, 9.1 YPCatch, 0 TDs

Ahmad Bradshaw - 67 attempts, 5.3 YPC, 1 TD, 5 rec, 8.4 YPCatch, 1 TD

Darren Sproles - 61 attempts, 5.4 YPC, 1 TD, 29 rec, 11.8 YPCatch, 5 TDs

Both of those guys are much more explosive than Betts and average nearly 2 more yards per carry. Both of those guys also average MORE in YPC than the starters in front of them. It's not even close in terms of production with limited touches.

Betts is a great insurance policy for Portis, should he ever go down. As a pure back-up, however, he is average at best.

Posted by: psps23

Posted by: psps23 | December 29, 2008 12:59 PM | Report abuse

Greg, I agree that if Betts was used more Portis would have been used less. That's a given. But apparently the coaches didn't think that using Betts made the team better. That's my point. Betts is an emergency running back in a glass - do not use extensively unless there is an emergency.

Posted by: learnedhand1 | December 29, 2008 1:00 PM | Report abuse

Can you agree to this?? Hopefully you're at LEAST THIS INTELLIGENT, right.

***I am not intelligent according to the Greg's Dictionary

So, given that CP was OVER-USED, it stands to reason that Betts was UNDER-USED.

** CP Over-used - Yes
Betts Under-used - No because the coaches didn't think he'd help win the game unless they had to pass alot.......

My FRIGGIN POINT THROUGH THIS WHOLE THING, is that CP should be used LESS, and Betts should be used more.

** So we agree on half and not the other

CAN YOU UNDERSTAND THAT POINT??????????????????????????????????????????????????????

** Understand your point, but disagree with it.....

Posted by: BeantownGreg | December 29, 2008 12:54 PM |

Posted by: DaReal4th | December 29, 2008 1:00 PM | Report abuse

I said it when we resign Betts it was a mistake. Thrash needs to be shown the door. I really don't understand why Zorn didn't give the rookies more playing time yesterday. His statement about pre season next year is just down right stupid

JM220

Posted by: icetotalpackage | December 29, 2008 1:01 PM | Report abuse

Vinnie's / Zorn's lackadaisical attitude toward the offseason does not bode well? 10 days off and then the senior bowl? With guys like Washington, Campbell, and Rogers twisting in the wind?

My question to Jason is just how much say does the Vinnster have on starting lineups? I.E. Was Roger's benched by coaches or by Snidely Owl? Based on Campbell's assessment it makes you wonder?

Finally, it really doesn't matter what Zorn says or does not say. And I guess that's the point isn't it? WHAT DOES OWNER/GM Snidely Owl have to say, and is he likely to say it through his hamster the Vinnster?

Posted by: periculum | December 29, 2008 1:01 PM | Report abuse

Dr. James Andrews is a miracle worker! Not only does he see professional atheletes, but he dramatically changes the lives of everyday people on a daily basis.

I can vouch for that personally b/c his work allowed my Mom to walk again. All of his money is well earned and certainly well deserved.

Posted by: Soup17 | December 29, 2008 1:01 PM | Report abuse

"I didn't point to it as the sole reason. I pointed to it because it was a critical play on that drive, and it was a relatively easy, head-on tackle that any player should be expected to make. He whiffed.

Posted by: psps23 | December 29, 2008 12:40 PM

Similar to CR22 dropping passes that hit both hands?

Posted by: DaReal4th"

Similar as in "relatively easy play", yes.

Different because one play yields positive yards and a first down for the other team, while the other play yields an incomplete pass, which is still a positive play.

Posted by: psps23 | December 29, 2008 1:01 PM | Report abuse

This whole press conference I'm listening to is stupid, he really think this offense is on the right track.

Posted by: Flounder21 | December 29, 2008 1:03 PM | Report abuse

This whole press conference I'm listening to is stupid, he really think this offense is on the right track.

Posted by: Flounder21 | December 29, 2008 1:03 PM | Report abuse

AGREED!! I just don't like Zorn. I don't think it is best for the team to let him go at this point, but I just do not like him.

Too laid back and "Medium" for me!

Posted by: Soup17 | December 29, 2008 1:04 PM | Report abuse

At this point Betts is probably a better starter (AND CHEAPER) in the WCO than Portis. The problem is Portis contract guaranteed through 2010. DEAD CAP again because he should have been shown out, the way Stephen Davis was.

Thrash doesn't cost you anything more than a roster spot and your precious YOUNG WR suck the wing-wang on the specials else HE would have been gone don't you think? We'll give Malcom the benefit of the doubt because of his good attitude and his injury. But Thomas? Davis? Where were they on the specials? Thrash was there as "old" as he is.


"I said it when we resign Betts it was a mistake. Thrash needs to be shown the door. "

Posted by: periculum | December 29, 2008 1:05 PM | Report abuse

mm beef

Posted by: alex35332 | December 29, 2008 1:06 PM | Report abuse

Zorn's season:

Medium == Mediocre === average === 8 wins, 8 losses.

Posted by: periculum | December 29, 2008 1:06 PM | Report abuse

And that's where MArcus Mason comes in. That's on Vinny and Greg to a lessor extent (trying to lighten the mood).....

This doesn't make any sense, though.

What reason do you have to think that Mason would be better than Betts?

He couldn't make this team, then he couldn't make the Ravens, then he couldn't make the Jets -- The JETS!!!

I swear you people put way too much stock in pre-season games and how these donks do against moonlighting UPS drivers.

Posted by: VTDuffman | December 29, 2008 12:52 PM

Marcus Mason has 0 carries for 0 yards in a real NFL game, but sure he would probably be way better then Betts, because he is secretly SuperMan.

This is just dumb so please lets change the subject.

Posted by: Flounder21 | December 29, 2008 12:56 PM

My point since last offseason was trade Betts and give MAson a chance. Betts has done nothing for us. Since Mason has done nothing as well without even playing a snap, why not try him out was my original point last offseason which is in play now because we are in the next offseason......


VT- People put stocks in rookies all the time and they never have a stat until you put them on the field.....

Posted by: DaReal4th | December 29, 2008 1:06 PM | Report abuse

"But apparently the coaches didn't think that using Betts made the team better"

And this line of thinking, and the fact that Portis was both ineffective and hurt at the end of BOTH years, makes that line of thinking look INCORRECT, would it not??

Posted by: BeantownGreg | December 29, 2008 1:06 PM | Report abuse

It's true Betts has only shown it once in his career. He also has only been given the opportunity once.

He may not be a good change of pace back because maybe he needs a bunch of carries to get going.

But please don't say he only did it one time to diminish him. He's only been given the opportunity once. He made the most of it.

Posted by: Gweez | December 29, 2008 1:06 PM | Report abuse

But please don't say he only did it one time to diminish him. He's only been given the opportunity once. He made the most of it.

Posted by: Gweez | December 29, 2008 1:06 PM | Report abuse

Please look to the current QB in NE for an example of "having the opportunity once" and "taking advantage of that opportunity".

Posted by: Soup17 | December 29, 2008 1:09 PM | Report abuse

My question to Jason is just how much say does the Vinnster have on starting lineups? I.E. Was Roger's benched by coaches or by Snidely Owl? Based on Campbell's assessment it makes you wonder?

Finally, it really doesn't matter what Zorn says or does not say. And I guess that's the point isn't it? WHAT DOES OWNER/GM Snidely Owl have to say, and is he likely to say it through his hamster the Vinnster?

Posted by: periculum | December 29, 2008 1:01 PM |

You just love making dumb comments, if Vinny had say in who played and who did'nt don't you think all the rookies would be playing since he drafted them.

I get it you don't like Snyder or Vinny but blaming everything on them even when Gibbs was in charge of everything and could have fired Vinny if he wanted to makes you look lame.

Posted by: Flounder21 | December 29, 2008 1:10 PM | Report abuse

I guess you didn't read Jason's blog article on Portis "performance" or lack thereof. He opened his mouth and said he wasn't getting enough carries, and that was why they were losing. Give him the ball and what happens? Fumbles, CHOKE, CHOKE 3.2 yds per carry avg. Yesterday Adrian Peterson broke off a 67 yard run. Portis? Five yards and a cloud of dust if you were lucky.

And someone here called Betts an average backup?

"Plus, CP26 has never been politically correct, but look at these other teamates with losing attitudes and you tell me which one is worse?"

Posted by: periculum | December 29, 2008 1:11 PM | Report abuse

flound, don't waste your time....just not worth it.

soup, are you saying that betts didn't take advantage of his opportunity?? I don't understand what you're saying?? Cassell had one chance because of injury, and played well. Betts had one chance because of injury and played well.

Posted by: BeantownGreg | December 29, 2008 1:12 PM | Report abuse

The team needs Leigh Torrence back, desperately.

Posted by: Poopy_McPoop | December 29, 2008 1:12 PM | Report abuse

Yeah, like when Marty fired him? But he was still there as personal assistant to the owner ... now wasn't he?

I don't think Gibbs had as much power as you give him credit for. He wasn't perfect. But he wasn't that stupid.

That's okay most of your comments seem just as lame to me. I attribute to a lower IQ.

"I get it you don't like Snyder or Vinny but blaming everything on them even when Gibbs was in charge of everything and could have fired Vinny if he wanted to makes you look lame."

Posted by: periculum | December 29, 2008 1:14 PM | Report abuse

Betts has done nothing for us.

This is the part that I don't agree with, though. Betts has done plenty to prove himself as a solid #2. You are just creating a false equivalence between the two, when there really is none.

Posted by: VTDuffman | December 29, 2008 1:14 PM | Report abuse

Maybe I am too conservative (who would have thought) but I say you need to try and play the off season low key, no blow-it-ups and big FA's this year. we got to be smart about it in the end.

Posted by: alex35332 | December 29, 2008 1:15 PM | Report abuse

Does this not lead one to infer snidely owl / vinnster meddling at some level? Given Portis contract and friendship with the owner?

Seems like you all just dance around the truth.

"flound, don't waste your time....just not worth it."

"And this line of thinking, and the fact that Portis was both ineffective and hurt at the end of BOTH years, makes that line of thinking look INCORRECT, would it not??"

Posted by: periculum | December 29, 2008 1:17 PM | Report abuse

suzanne, rember the norv years? problem with norv wasn't that he wasn't smart enough it was that he wasn't a general. the way he handled westbrook and dropped passes, missed tackles and snyder and such...

well zorny THINKS he is a general but he's not even smart enough to be a coordinator in this league. just my opinion and 31 other teams' executives over the last 30 years.

Posted by: dealer1 | December 29, 2008 1:18 PM | Report abuse

I don't think Gibbs had as much power as you give him credit for. He wasn't perfect. But he wasn't that stupid.

That's okay most of your comments seem just as lame to me. I attribute to a lower IQ.

"I get it you don't like Snyder or Vinny but blaming everything on them even when Gibbs was in charge of everything and could have fired Vinny if he wanted to makes you look lame."

Posted by: periculum | December 29, 2008 1:14 PM |

Oh I forgot you work for the Skins that is how you get your information.

I listen to people who know the organization inside and out and they all say Gibbs had complete control.

When Marty was running things Cerrato was doing TV, he might have been around but he had no say in what went on, Gibbs could have done the same thing.

You have a lot of nerv talking about I.Q. it took you a month and 300 post to realize we could not get rid of Portis because of his contract.

You also were the one up here saying we had two 3rd round picks when it has been stated on this blog 1000 times that we have a 1st, 3rd, 5th and 6th.

Posted by: Flounder21 | December 29, 2008 1:19 PM | Report abuse

Derek Anderson - took advantage of an opportunity. Then what?

Betts - Took advantage of an opportunity
What has he done in two years since?

Yes it's less carries for Portis...but they aren't productive carries...so what's the point?

That's all I'm saying.

Posted by: SDMDTSU | December 29, 2008 1:21 PM | Report abuse

jasno, now would be a perfect time for the anti-snyderrato stuff...

Posted by: dealer1 | December 29, 2008 1:22 PM | Report abuse

flound, don't waste your time....just not worth it.

soup, are you saying that betts didn't take advantage of his opportunity?? I don't understand what you're saying?? Cassell had one chance because of injury, and played well. Betts had one chance because of injury and played well.

Posted by: BeantownGreg | December 29, 2008 1:12 PM | Report abuse

Not disagreeing with you Beantown. I'm just still in awe as to what Matt has been able to do in NE.

Posted by: Soup17 | December 29, 2008 1:24 PM | Report abuse

I always thought most of you here overrated Betts. Yeah, the dude had ONE good season, and he HAS HAD chances to come in and spell Portis and contribute. Since '06 HE HAS NOT!!!!

The ones that are love struck with Betts are the same ones talking sh*t to those who think that giving up on Mason was a mistake, at least so soon.

I find it amusing that some of you think that Shaun Alexander AT THIS POINT IN HIS CAREER would've been the better option over Mason. I guess it comes from (Like Betts) Alexander's PAST success in the league.

*Blah*

Look, for all the Mason haters (Or just want to piss on the Mason parade, OR HATE TO BE WRONG ABOUT ANYTHING - you know who you are), by keeping the dude when Portis began to wear down, OR when it became clear that Betts just isn't that spell HB, change of pace HB, capable #2 HB; YOUNG guys like Marcus Mason (Ward, Bradshaw, Grant) come in fresh LATE in the season after given nearly a FULL season on the ACTIVE ROSTER to come in and give your main RB (Portis, Jacobs) rest when they need it most LATE in the season.

The 'skins did not have a RB that was able to do this, thus resulting in Portis taking on the form of DUST the last few weeks or so.

I'll never, EVER figure it out:
The fascination with OLD, hardly EVER contributing vets at their REAL/NATURAL positions, such as: Cartwright (He's been killing it on STs this year, huh? *blah*), Thrash (How is this stiff still on the damn field?), and Betts ('06 was a good year, so was '84, '76, and '96 - IT'S THE PAST PEOPLE!!!!)

Posted by: RedDMV | December 29, 2008 1:25 PM | Report abuse

peric, i NEVER heard cp saying he's not getting enough carries. he's always complained that he's getting too many carries. which is the truth. CP made 6-2 happen and zorny started to read his own clippings and went to 7-7 and then he found god and went 8-8. "i am the worst coach in the league" saved him his job. btw no matter what hack wilbon tells you this town and skins fans are the most forgiving town/fans in america. we dishout second chances without any real reason all the time.

Posted by: dealer1 | December 29, 2008 1:27 PM | Report abuse

Posted by: dealer1 | December 29, 2008 1:28 PM | Report abuse

"Yes it's less carries for Portis...but they aren't productive carries...so what's the point?

That's all I'm saying.

Posted by: SDMDTSU"

The point is the less productive carries from Betts leads to more productive carries from Portis, due to him being more rested.

Having said that, Betts is still just an average back-up. Always has been. He proved he was much better as a starter. Personally, I think this team would be better served having a threat like Darren Sproles, Jerious Norwood, Leon Washington, or Ahmad Bradshaw teamed up with Portis.

Still, Betts is far from a problem with this team. There are much larger issues looming than Betts.

Posted by: psps23 | December 29, 2008 1:28 PM | Report abuse

The team is a hodgepodge of personalities. There's no inner intelligence, no feel when hiring coaches and players. And it's like no one person is in charge, leading to dilution of decisions, leading to mediocrity.

It's been said a thousand times, sorry to repeat. Just that it makes me pessimistic for the future.

Posted by: columbiard | December 29, 2008 1:28 PM | Report abuse

It is SO GREAT to have the team with the 4TH RANKED defense in the NFL.

When you have the 4TH RANKED defense in the NFL, you just know that they're going to stop the other team when it really counts.

4TH RANKED DEFENSE!!!

Life as a Redskins fan just couldn't be better, could it?

Now, where did I put those meds?

Posted by: RedskinWillie | December 29, 2008 1:30 PM | Report abuse

Marcus Mason (Ward, Bradshaw, Grant)

This trumps the line of the day from earlier line of the day.

The only thing is that Ward, Bradshaw and Grant are employed by the NFL, and have carried the ball in a REAL LIVE NFL GAME...

Marcus Mason, and Greg Marino(ME) have the same career stats in the NFL.

Zero Carries
Zero Touchdowns


I don't get it....I really don't get the love affair with Mason. Help me out here....The Redskins, Jets and Ravens all thought that he wasn't good enough. Not to mention that ALL 32 teams don't think he's good enought because ANY of them could sign him, and exactly ZERO have chosen to do so.

I know...all he needs is a chance.....

Posted by: BeantownGreg | December 29, 2008 1:30 PM | Report abuse

I will be SO, SO SO SO disappointed if we get rid of Carlos.

Unless we're talking about getting a first round pick that we'll go spend on Malcom Jenkins from Ohio State, it's just dumb.

Let's see, DHall was getting paid 485,000 this year over what, 6 games, and if he played well he'll have a chance to make freaking bank. Duh. Of course the guy is gonna go all out. But we have no clue what he's gonna do when he gets paid.

DHall was rock bottom and had a lot to prove because he had a lot to lose. Watch, I guarantee Rogers will go onto the Pro Bowl and DHall will get paid and content.

I've been a Rogers fan from day one, he's been one of my favorites.

Redskins have done a lot it seems to try to make their fans turn on 'em, and this won't do it, nothing will, but I'm just gonna be really, really pissed if they really get rid of him. Unexcusable.

Posted by: TheTruth11 | December 29, 2008 1:33 PM | Report abuse

Look at Leon Washington's numbers with about 10 fewer carries than Betts over the last two years.

Betts:
2007 93 carries for 335 and 1 TD; 21 catches for 174 and 1 TD
2008 61 carries for 206 yds and 1 TD; 22 catches for 200 yds and 0 TD

Washington:

2007 71 carries for 353 and 3 TDs; 36 catches for 213 and 0 TD
2008 76 carries for 448 and 6 TDs; 47 catches for 355 and 2 TDs.

I don't want to hear that he hasn't had a chance junk.

Posted by: learnedhand1 | December 29, 2008 1:42 PM | Report abuse

Its interesting that so much time is being spent discussing CP, Betts, Mason, & Rogers when neither the RBs nor the DBs are problematic positions for the Skins. The problem with this team is that management has neglected both lines for several years in an attempt to unearth stars at the skill positions.

The Skins O-Line can't pass protect, and due to age can't run block as the seasons progress. The D-Line has no push up the middle, and as a result cannot effectively rush the passer. Not to mention that they are punished with the run late in games. The Skins need to upgrade the interior of both lines. Hopefully they are able to obtain a talented DT, LG, & RT this offseason. These changes will allow them to truly evaluate the rest of the roster because everything in football starts in the trenches.

Considering these critical weaknesses, its a testament to the rest of the players that the team able to stay in the hunt as long as they did. Hopefully Haynesworth keeps his word from last offseason and doesn't resign with the Titans, because Snyder will surely bring him in if he doesn't.

Posted by: Prime1 | December 30, 2008 11:05 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company