Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
On Twitter: RedskinsInsider and PostSports  |  Facebook  |  E-mail alerts: Redskins and Sports  |  RSS

Tim Tebow reportedly will visit Redskins next week

The Redskins saw Tim Tebow at the Senior Bowl. They saw him at the NFL Scouting Combine. They saw him during a private workout 1 1/2 weeks ago in Gainesville, Fla. And they'll see him again next week.

Tebow is scheduled to visit with the team next week in Ashburn, according to ESPN's Adam Schefter.

It's probably not worth reading too much into this. Each team is allowed to bring in 30 draft prospects for a visit. Sometimes teams select guys in the draft that they didn't even bother bringing in. With all signs pointing toward the Redskins taking a quarterback with one of their top two picks, it only makes sense that they do their due diligence with each quarterback.

There's so much subterfuge and misdirection associated with the draft that often teams simply want the rest of the league to think they're high on a particular player. For example, when Shanahan openly praised Tebow during the owners meetings last week, the first thought many had was: Guess he's not going after Tebow.

By all accounts, Tebow is wowing teams in his personal meetings and many analysts -- including Sports Illustrated's Peter King -- think he's clawed his way into the first round.

By Rick Maese  |  March 30, 2010; 3:39 PM ET
Categories:  Mike Shanahan , NFL Draft  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Redskins take a look at Eric Berry with creating turnovers in mind
Next: Source: Jimmy Clausen to work out with Redskins

Comments

With all signs pointing toward the Redskins taking a quarterback with one of their top two picks...

There's so much subterfuge and misdirection associated with the draft that often teams simply want the rest of the league to think they're high on a particular player...

By Rick Maese | March 30, 2010; 3:39 PM ET

So, it's clear that they're taking a QB, unless of course this is really misdirection. Okay, moving on....

Posted by: League-Source | March 30, 2010 3:46 PM | Report abuse

First! (Hey.)

Posted by: freakzilla | March 30, 2010 3:46 PM | Report abuse

How does he feel about playing left tackle?

Posted by: RedSkinHead | March 30, 2010 3:46 PM | Report abuse

So, it's clear that they're taking a QB, unless of course this is really misdirection. Okay, moving on....

Posted by: League-Source | March 30, 2010 3:46 PM
------------------------------------------
Yes, this is clearly misdirection... unless it is not. Definitely.

Posted by: RedSkinHead | March 30, 2010 3:47 PM | Report abuse

wow... I missed like two posts!

_____________________________________

"Crystal Clear" is that Vodka Hostess/Hooker I paired up with in Lauderdale that lost weekend...

... don't park in the swayle.. in old fart liquor dale...

Posted by: DikShuttle | March 30, 2010 3:46 PM | Report abuse

Posted by: DikShuttle | March 30, 2010 3:47 PM | Report abuse

Yes, this is clearly misdirection... unless it is not. Definitely.

Posted by: RedSkinHead | March 30, 2010 3:47 PM | Report abuse

I am sure it is, unless I am secretly misdirecting you.

Posted by: alex35332 | March 30, 2010 3:49 PM | Report abuse

(Dang.)

Posted by: freakzilla | March 30, 2010 3:50 PM | Report abuse

It Tebowmania! Catch the fever!


Posted by: Predator48 | March 30, 2010 3:54 PM | Report abuse

Its Tebowmania! Catch the fever!


Posted by: Predator48 | March 30, 2010 3:54 PM | Report abuse

re-post:

The more I watch Bradford's game reels, the more obvious it becomes that he is Shanny's type of guy. Problem is, I want Okung too.

So let's get creative here...

The Rams need EVERYTHING just about - with a special emphasis on QB, WR, CB and DE (plus TE, OT. DT, LB and SS last time I checked)

What if we bundle JC 17 with guys like (pick any TWO) Carlos, Carter, Cooley, Wilson, Golston, or Kelley and then throw in Montgomery for good measure (maybe we should sign him first...)?

They fill at least three holes, and we get Bradford and Okung and still have an early second rounder. That is a nucleus to build a team around. Losing any of those two won't kill us, and Monty never plays anyway.

Stranger things....

Posted by: edvar | March 30, 2010 3:55 PM | Report abuse

Bradford rawked 50 tds and 8 ints in 2008, his Heismann year...That's about THREE TDs passed A GAME...sick..

Posted by: frak | March 30, 2010 4:01 PM | Report abuse

Hilarious:


Santonio Holmes invites fan to commit suicide, Twitter style

Posted by Mike Florio on March 30, 2010 3:12 PM ET

Earlier today, we pointed out that Steelers receiver Santonio Holmes has been trading jabs with fans via Twitter, in the wake of Monday's news that he has been sued for assault and battery.

We noticed, for example, that Holmes reminded one fan that the fans don't cut Holmes' checks.

We hadn't noticed a far less charitable exchange with another fan. Holmes accuses the fan of trying to make Holmes look like the bad guy, and then says that the fan "shud try finding the worst thing that you could drink n kill urself."

Nice.

So while Holmes looks to be in the clear from the perspective of the Orlando Police Department, he's still going to have some explaining to do to the folks who actually cut his checks.

Posted by: RedDMV | March 30, 2010 4:03 PM | Report abuse

So, it's clear that they're taking a QB, unless of course this is really misdirection. Okay, moving on....

Posted by: League-Source | March 30, 2010 3:46 PM
------------------------------------------
Yes, this is clearly misdirection... unless it is not. Definitely.

Posted by: RedSkinHead | March 30, 2010 3:47 PM | Report abuse


That's just what they want you to think!

Posted by: Original_etrod | March 30, 2010 4:04 PM | Report abuse

Bradford rawked 50 tds and 8 ints in 2008, his Heismann year...That's about THREE TDs passed A GAME...sick..

Posted by: frak | March 30, 2010 4:01 PM | Report abuse

Oh ya, thats nice and all but is he a Star Wars or Star Trek fan?

Posted by: alex35332 | March 30, 2010 4:04 PM | Report abuse

Happy birthday, RedDMV.

Also, F Tebow.

Posted by: NateinthePDX | March 30, 2010 4:06 PM | Report abuse

My best guess.

Shanahan has never had a top 10 overall pick in his career. I'm guessing he expects to never have a top 10 pick again -- unless he can swindle it out of someone (and those chances have diminished since Cerrato, Vinny is no longer making deals).

If its his only shot AND he sees a QB he loves, he picks him. His greatest success came with Elway, a #1 pick. Plus, Shanahan isn't likely to worry about success in 2010 as much as 2011 and 2012.

So the question is, does he see enough of what he likes in Bradford? If he does, I have no doubt he'll make the trade with StL Of course, there is always a chance that Shanahan likes one of the other QBs better than Braford.

But this is one of the very few times in Shanahan's career that he has been in a position to pick his first choice for QB. I doubt he passes on it.

Posted by: zcezcest1 | March 30, 2010 4:08 PM | Report abuse

"...try finding the worst thing that you could drink n kill urself."

Bleach
Sulfuric Acid
Chlorine
Urine
Watery bowel movement
Gutter water

I can't think of anything else...

Posted by: RedDMV | March 30, 2010 4:08 PM | Report abuse

Actually, he averaged about FOUR TDs a game (thank you, Budweiser)..I think Camp's only 4 TD game came against the Raiders last year..And Lucas is giving him a tryout as the next Luke Skywalker...

Posted by: frak | March 30, 2010 4:13 PM | Report abuse

RI Kool Aid

Posted by: NateinthePDX1 | March 30, 2010 4:14 PM | Report abuse

I can't think of anything else...

Posted by: RedDMV | March 30, 2010 4:08 PM | Report abuse

Anti-freeze.

...and happy birthday.

Posted by: Original_etrod | March 30, 2010 4:14 PM | Report abuse

I can't think of anything else...

Posted by: RedDMV | March 30, 2010 4:08 PM | Report abuse

clamatos

Posted by: PortisPocketsStr8 | March 30, 2010 4:16 PM | Report abuse

"...try finding the worst thing that you could drink n kill urself."

Bleach
Sulfuric Acid
Chlorine
Urine
Watery bowel movement
Gutter water

I can't think of anything else...

Beet juice

Posted by: edvar | March 30, 2010 4:16 PM | Report abuse

Red... urine wont kill you.

Posted by: peoplearestupid1 | March 30, 2010 4:16 PM | Report abuse

Oh ya, thats nice and all but is he a Star Wars or Star Trek fan?

Posted by: alex35332 | March 30, 2010 4:04 PM | Report abuse


Clausen is a Battlestar Galactica fan.

Posted by: Original_etrod | March 30, 2010 4:16 PM | Report abuse

...and we get Bradford and Okung and still have an early second rounder.

Stranger things....

Posted by: edvar
___________________

Up until that moment, you always looked like one of the most logical, grounded people on here Edro ;) Which of course isn't saying much. Like your optimism. 3 of those Skins, incl JC, for the overall first? I'll have some of what he's smoking... I think the Skins should send you to St Louis right now to negotiate that deal.

Posted by: Oogalaboogala | March 30, 2010 4:17 PM | Report abuse

I can't think of anything else...

Posted by: RedDMV | March 30, 2010 4:08 PM | Report abuse

A few bottles of Cisco, the drink for the Classy!!

Posted by: gatorskinz2000 | March 30, 2010 4:17 PM | Report abuse

Posted by: frak | March 30, 2010 4:01 PM


Brennan threw 58 tds with a far less talented cast of characters. Detmer put up all kinds of numbers at BYU and was a marginal qb in the nfl at best. Big numbers in college dont necessarily translate to NFL success.

Posted by: KingJoffeJoffer | March 30, 2010 4:17 PM | Report abuse

Tebow likes Buck Rogers

Posted by: Original_etrod | March 30, 2010 4:18 PM | Report abuse

"...try finding the worst thing that you could drink n kill urself."

Bleach
Sulfuric Acid
Chlorine
Urine
Watery bowel movement
Gutter water

I can't think of anything else...

Posted by: RedDMV | March 30, 2010 4:08 PM |

Bong water
Bong vodka
Midori Melon
Blended Rats

Posted by: scampbell1975 | March 30, 2010 4:19 PM | Report abuse

I can't think of anything else...

Posted by: RedDMV | March 30, 2010 4:08 PM | Report abuse

R.I. H8erade
~

Posted by: ifthethunderdontgetya | March 30, 2010 4:20 PM | Report abuse

The more I watch Bradford's game reels, the more obvious it becomes that he is Shanny's type of guy. Problem is, I want Okung too.

So let's get creative here...

The Rams need EVERYTHING just about - with a special emphasis on QB, WR, CB and DE (plus TE, OT. DT, LB and SS last time I checked)

What if we bundle JC 17 with guys like (pick any TWO) Carlos, Carter, Cooley, Wilson, Golston, or Kelley and then throw in Montgomery for good measure (maybe we should sign him first...)?

They fill at least three holes, and we get Bradford and Okung and still have an early second rounder. That is a nucleus to build a team around. Losing any of those two won't kill us, and Monty never plays anyway.

Stranger things....

Posted by: edvar

Its not that strange to me. The Rams get a QB, multiple defenders and a few offensive weapons. The Rams will want younger players. Send them 5 solid NFL players, at least 3 with long futures ahead of them. We get rid of a couple people that aren't a good fit (Campbell, Carter) with the direction of the team, plus a TE who would only be on the field part time.

The Rams have a great RB who'll turn 27 in couple months. He's the type of RB that can take a decent team and turn it into a good team.

They need good players at reasonable prices a lot more than they need 1 potentially great one at a huge price.

Spags is in year 2 as HC. In the NFL, you get a 2-3 years to turn things around -- not 5. So this is a year where Spags has to show signs of major improvement.

Finally, the Rams compete in a weak division. AZ lost its QB and a top WR. Alex Smith is still the QB in SF. Hassleback is nearing the end in Seattle and Pete Carroll wasn't that great and NFL coach to begin with.

If the Rams want to take a big step in 1 year by trading away Bradford ... I can see it.

Posted by: zcezcest1 | March 30, 2010 4:20 PM | Report abuse

Sorry, Pike likes Buck Rogers.

Tebow's still on Veggie Tales.

Posted by: Original_etrod | March 30, 2010 4:21 PM | Report abuse

Up until that moment, you always looked like one of the most logical, grounded people on here Edro ;) Which of course isn't saying much. Like your optimism. 3 of those Skins, incl JC, for the overall first? I'll have some of what he's smoking... I think the Skins should send you to St Louis right now to negotiate that deal.

Posted by: Oogalaboogala | March 30, 2010 4:17 PM


Yeah, thought I'd take a walk on the wild side just once. Would love to find a way to get Bradford and Okung without giving up picks...

Posted by: edvar | March 30, 2010 4:22 PM | Report abuse

Tebow's still on Veggie Tales.

Posted by: Original_etrod | March 30, 2010 4:21 PM

The whole Qubo Channel...

...And the Berenstein BEars...

Posted by: 4thFloor | March 30, 2010 4:29 PM | Report abuse

Also, F Tebow.

Posted by: NateinthePDX | March 30, 2010 4:06 PM

Hey, HateinthePDX, Tebow went to Florida, not Duke. Go, Duke!

Posted by: League-Source | March 30, 2010 4:35 PM | Report abuse

No go-go band has ever done it better than 80's RE (any line-up you choose).

One on One '86

Posted by: learnedhand1 | March 30, 2010 4:35 PM | Report abuse

Quality misfits?

Campbell
Carter
L Alexander (he's not an LB)
Cooley or Davis (1 will have to sit too much)
Albert ???
Landry
Rogers

These are guys the Rams could seriously consider in a trade who would get signficant playing time.

There are others, A Montgomery, Golston, Wilson, Kelly, D Thomas, M Mitchell that the Rams could ask for.

Posted by: zcezcest1 | March 30, 2010 4:39 PM | Report abuse

There are others, A Montgomery, Golston, Wilson, Kelly, D Thomas, M Mitchell that the Rams could ask for.

Posted by: zcezcest1 | March 30, 2010 4:39 PM

Because the Rams are really stupid. They wouldn't think to ask for Orakpo. They'd only want the players that we want to give up.

Posted by: League-Source | March 30, 2010 4:42 PM | Report abuse

My best guess.

Shanahan has never had a top 10 overall pick in his career. I'm guessing he expects to never have a top 10 pick again -- unless he can swindle it out of someone (and those chances have diminished since Cerrato, Vinny is no longer making deals).

If its his only shot AND he sees a QB he loves, he picks him. His greatest success came with Elway, a #1 pick. Plus, Shanahan isn't likely to worry about success in 2010 as much as 2011 and 2012.

So the question is, does he see enough of what he likes in Bradford? If he does, I have no doubt he'll make the trade with StL Of course, there is always a chance that Shanahan likes one of the other QBs better than Braford.

But this is one of the very few times in Shanahan's career that he has been in a position to pick his first choice for QB. I doubt he passes on it.

Posted by: zcezcest1 | March 30, 2010 4:08 PM | Report abuse
__________

After thinking about it, I'm almost ready to agree with you - I think Shanny absolutely wants to pick the next Elway this year - but at the end of the day, we just don't have a LT at all. Not even an inadequate stopgap. He's just not on the roster, period. I think the plan was to sign Clifton at a reasonable price to serve as a temporary but respectable starting LT for a couple years and find the next Elway at #4. But with free agency not bringing in a LT, I just can't see Shanny passing on Okung if he's available, out of absolute necessity. How can we proceed without one? I don't think anyone would trust a 2nd, 3rd (if we had one), or 4th round pick with the starting LT job protecting a prized rookie QB. I'd rather have Levi Jones again than see that happen. No, I think that (1) Bradford will go #1 and will therefore be unavailable, (2) Clausen will prove to not be worthy of that high a pick, (3) the 'Skins will pick Okung at #4, and (4) they will hope to heck that Tebow's available, and maybe trade up a little, provided his appearance next week goes well, in a lower round. I don't like Tebow as a first rounder b/c of his well documented limitations (arm-strength and mechanics), but it wouldn't break my heart too much if we got him in either the 2nd or 3rd round (preferably 3rd). Thoughts?

Posted by: skinsfan713 | March 30, 2010 4:43 PM | Report abuse

Because the Rams are really stupid. They wouldn't think to ask for Orakpo. They'd only want the players that we want to give up.

Posted by: League-Source

The Skins won't trade Orakpo. There aren't many 'won't consider trading him' guys on this team ... Orakpo might be the only guy the Skins wouldn't consider an offer for at this point.

Posted by: zcezcest1 | March 30, 2010 4:46 PM | Report abuse

So the question is, does he see enough of what he likes in Bradford? If he does, I have no doubt he'll make the trade with StL Of course, there is always a chance that Shanahan likes one of the other QBs better than Braford.

But this is one of the very few times in Shanahan's career that he has been in a position to pick his first choice for QB. I doubt he passes on it.

Posted by: zcezcest1

WHY in the flippin' world would anyone with ANY sense made a trade with St. Louis to move up the the #1 spot for an unproven QB (or any player for that matter) who is overcoming an injury?? That is the definition of insanity.

Sure, Bradford looked good yesterday but it was ONE day and with his receivers in his locale.

We have far, far too many holes to fill to trade anyway any player or heaven forbid one of our 5 draft picks for a #1 slot who may or may not be a success - and who we would have to pay $$$$.

Posted by: Lisa_R | March 30, 2010 4:47 PM | Report abuse

What if we bundle JC 17 with (pick any TWO) guys like Carlos, Carter, Cooley, Wilson, Golston, or Kelley and then throw in Montgomery for good measure (maybe we should sign him first...)?

They fill at least three holes, and we get Bradford and Okung and still have an early second rounder. That is a nucleus to build a team around. Losing any of those two won't kill us, and Monty never plays anyway.

Stranger things....

Posted by: edvar | March 30, 2010 3:51 PM | Report abuse

1. JC and any two of the guys you mention WON'T COME CLOSE to being enough to get the Rams' number one pick. The Rams will doubtlessly hold out for a deal similar to the one that happened in 2004 when the Giants traded the no. 4 overall pick, a 3rd rounder, and a first and a fifth the following year to San Diego for the rights to no. 1 overall pick Eli Manning, and 2., Okung may not be there at 4 anyway.

Posted by: rbpalmer | March 30, 2010 4:48 PM | Report abuse

"How does he feel about playing left tackle?"

Exactly.

It's funny. When the Skins picked Landry I said pretty much the same thing,"I hope he can play defensive line."

I was literally BEGGING for moron Ceratto to pick up that kid from Houston, DT Okoye. But they didn't and Okoye was BY FAR the better pick.

Now we have the same situation with Bradford and Okung.

Don't be stupid Shanny, don't do a Vinny.

Please? There will be other QB's that come out of college. Maybe it's Tebow, maybe not. But you gotta fix that o-line FIRST.

Bill Parcells drafted Jake Long, and what happend? They made it to the playoffs the very next year. Mind you they had Brown at RB, but they went to the playoffs and then the birth of the "wildcat" offense.

Do the right thing Shanny.

- Ray

Posted by: rmcazz | March 30, 2010 4:56 PM | Report abuse

edvar

Rams get:

Carter, Golston, D Thomas, F Davis, J Campbell, C Wilson, Rocky Mc and our #2 pick for the next 2 years.

We get the #1 overall.

Why does this make sense for StL? Fill about 5 needs right away and for several years to come. WR, TE, QB, DL, LB. The #2 picks will add to their roster as well.

The players are all pretty cheap, so its low risk from a $$$ perspective. This is not a small point. The Rams aren't a 'deep pockets' team, a huge commitment to one guy isn't going to excite them. Plus, they need to take advantage of Steven Jackson soon, or not at all.

The risk to us is obvious. Danny writes another $75-100million in guarantees after writing a similar number last year to Hall and Albert. Danny may have deep pockets, but who knows how deep they really are at this point.

Posted by: zcezcest1 | March 30, 2010 4:56 PM | Report abuse

I would love for Okung to be there are 4, but Im not so sure it happens. The Lions oline is not much better than ours, and they, unlike us, already have their franchise QB. You cannot have the face of your franchise getting nailed time in and time out like Stafford did last year and you cannot take the risk that he gets hurt (again, like he did last year). I just dont imainge they will let Okung pass. A starting LT is of more importance than a starting DT ... especially if that LT has Pro Bowl Caliber potential...

While Suh and Mccoy both have pro-bowl caliber potential as DT's...its just more important to find a solid LT than it is to find a solid DT.

Posted by: peoplearestupid1 | March 30, 2010 5:01 PM | Report abuse

Posted by: edvar | March 30, 2010 3:51 PM | Report abuse

In fact, I'm not sure that JC and ALL of the guys you mentioned would be enough to get the deal done. You don't trade difference makers, even just potential difference-makers like Bradford, for a lot of ordinary players.

Posted by: rbpalmer | March 30, 2010 5:03 PM | Report abuse

Zeke -

Can't go along with that version of the deal. Too expensive for my blood. I am against trading any picks - this year or next. I just don't want to do it - especially second rounders.

Carter, Golston, D Thomas, F Davis, J Campbell, C Wilson, and Rocky Mac - ouch, but maybe. But not the draft picks as well. If they had to have the picks, I would probably have to walk.

I'd rather take two OT's in 1 and 2, keep all those guys, and shop for QB next year.

Posted by: edvar | March 30, 2010 5:09 PM | Report abuse

Rams get:

Carter, Golston, D Thomas, F Davis, J Campbell, C Wilson, Rocky Mc and our #2 pick for the next 2 years.

We get the #1 overall.

Posted by: zcezcest1 | March 30, 2010 4:56 PM |

We should throw in an aircraft carrier and that will seal the deal.

Posted by: League-Source | March 30, 2010 5:10 PM | Report abuse

beep beep

Santa Clausen's in sight

Posted by: League-Source | March 30, 2010 5:10 PM | Report abuse

* beep beep *

new post...

Posted by: NateinthePDX | March 30, 2010 5:11 PM | Report abuse

I would love for Okung to be there are 4, but Im not so sure it happens. The Lions oline is not much better than ours, and they, unlike us, already have their franchise QB.

Posted by: peoplearestupid1 | March 30, 2010 5:01 PM

I have the same nagging voice in the back of my head as well. But too many "mocks" have Okung there at #4, so I hope....

Posted by: edvar | March 30, 2010 5:12 PM | Report abuse

IF WE CAN GET TEBOW IN THE 2ND ROUND MAYBE 4TH ROUND ABSOLUTLATLY!!!!! OKUNG FOR SURE AND IF BRUCE CAMPBELL IS LEFT IN THE 2ND ROUND GRAB HIM

Posted by: bert3 | March 30, 2010 5:16 PM | Report abuse

What if we bundle JC 17 with (pick any TWO) guys like Carlos, Carter, Cooley, Wilson, Golston, or Kelley and then throw in Montgomery for good measure (maybe we should sign him first...)?

They fill at least three holes, and we get Bradford and Okung and still have an early second rounder. That is a nucleus to build a team around. Losing any of those two won't kill us, and Monty never plays anyway.

Stranger things....

Posted by: edvar | March 30, 2010 3:51 PM | Report abuse

1. JC and any two of the guys you mention WON'T COME CLOSE to being enough to get the Rams' number one pick. The Rams will doubtlessly hold out for a deal similar to the one that happened in 2004 when the Giants traded the no. 4 overall pick, a 3rd rounder, and a first and a fifth the following year to San Diego for the rights to no. 1 overall pick Eli Manning, and 2., Okung may not be there at 4 anyway.

Posted by: rbpalmer | March 30, 2010 4:48 PM |

You guys are on crack. Trade 5 of our starters plus some backups and then maybe picks too for an unproven, oft injured QB that's never thrown a pass in the NFL and will require a very large amount of money. Crack smokin'.

Posted by: scampbell1975 | March 30, 2010 5:19 PM | Report abuse

I'm pretty convinced the new triangle shaped UFOs are ours. Latest Stealth project sometimes known as TR-3Bs.

Burt does anyone have any theories about what these "Rods" might be? I mean, they are definitely weird and pretty much inexplicable.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zu7Ax5VYYDc

Posted by: TheCork | March 30, 2010 5:22 PM | Report abuse


I'm pretty convinced the new triangle shaped UFOs are ours. Latest Stealth project sometimes known as TR-3Bs.

Burt does anyone have any theories about what these "Rods" might be? I mean, they are definitely weird and pretty much inexplicable.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zu7Ax5VYYDc

Posted by: TheCork | March 30, 2010 5:27 PM | Report abuse

I'm not a Tebow fan, per sé, but I'd rather have Tebow throwing right-handed than Clausen.

Posted by: DC2Dallas | March 30, 2010 8:05 PM | Report abuse

That would be some magic trick to get Bradford, Okung, AND our 2nd round pick...(Allen opening up player roster for St Louis..."pick a player...any player. Ok, now another...AND another. Just leave us what you don't want).

I don't think so. Whatever dumbass thought of that first must've been an SNL character praising Ditka for his personnel decicsion making accumen.

We can build a competitive team THIS year with some sensible draft picks and the superior coaching and front office changes living up to their reputations/expectations. I believe it.

No radical betting the farm on one player trades people. That sounds like a Cerrato-type move.

HTTR

Posted by: DC2AZ99 | March 30, 2010 9:49 PM | Report abuse

Bradford, Tebow, Campbell....non of it really matters if you don't have an O-LINE!
Read Matthew 7:24-27 -
"Therefore everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into practice is like a wise man who built his house on the rock. The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house; yet it did not fall, because it had its foundation on the rock. But everyone who hears these words of mine and does not put them into practice is like a foolish man who built his house on sand. The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell with a great crash."

Posted by: Diogenes1 | March 31, 2010 12:08 PM | Report abuse

Posted by: nabpjax | March 31, 2010 2:47 PM | Report abuse

Looks like to me he has everything to make it as QB in the NFL.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NH-OFqm4MRI

http://www.gatorzone.com/football/bios.php?year=2009&player_id=93 - Career Stats at the bottom of page

http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Articles/11_3171_A_tale_of_six_quarterbacks.html
****************************************

No offense, but these links are awful.

"cold hard football facts" sound like a bunch of idiots and Tebow lovers, and there is no merit to their evaluation over anyone else's..

Player A and C are cleary better..
Because they obviously threw the ball a lot more..you know, like an NFL offense.
Its not all passer rating..

Posted by: kreator6996 | April 1, 2010 9:11 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company