Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
On Twitter: RedskinsInsider and PostSports  |  Facebook  |  E-mail alerts: Redskins and Sports  |  RSS

Rate the Redskins: How did they play against the Eagles?

In Donovan McNabb's Philadelphia homecoming, we ask, as we do every week, what you thought of the Redskins' effort on Sunday: Also don't forget, tweets with #ratetheredskins show up in our feed below.

Let us know how you think the Redskins played at #ratetheredskins

By Keith McMillan  | October 3, 2010; 6:38 PM ET
Categories:  Polls  | Tags:  Donovan McNabb, Philadelphia Eagles, Washington Redskins  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Michael Vick will not return to the game
Next: Redskins hang on to defeat Eagles, 17-12

Comments

10

we goging to win yay

Posted by: pabrian2008 | October 3, 2010 6:43 PM | Report abuse

there is still one quarter left

Posted by: mrshneebly | October 3, 2010 6:43 PM | Report abuse

I don't think Andy Reid is going to lose sleep for trading Mcnabb after this game is said and done. And the defense is making Kolb look like Vick running the ball.

Posted by: ga8085 | October 3, 2010 6:45 PM | Report abuse

The game ain't over dik head!

Posted by: rickyroge | October 3, 2010 6:46 PM | Report abuse

All this mix-'n-match with the threads is killing me.

Posted by: stevie_in_gp | October 3, 2010 6:48 PM | Report abuse

WTF.....KS is on crack!

Posted by: TheDirtySanchez | October 3, 2010 6:49 PM | Report abuse

The game ain't over dik head!

Posted by: rickyroge | October 3, 2010 6:46 PM

Right Hater and all week I had to sit and listen to you losers say we were gonna lose.

So eat it dikshuttlehead.

Posted by: pabrian2008 | October 3, 2010 6:51 PM | Report abuse

Seriously, pabrian, I think you gotta take this Skins/RI stuff a little less personally.

Lotta anger in there, my man. Hope you can work on that somehow.

Posted by: stevie_in_gp | October 3, 2010 6:53 PM | Report abuse

Why are they posting a poll about how well they played when they game is not over?

Posted by: mrshneebly | October 3, 2010 6:58 PM | Report abuse

hate to say it, but Fletcher is old!

Posted by: TheDirtySanchez | October 3, 2010 7:00 PM | Report abuse

Rogers truly sucks!

Posted by: DC2AZ99 | October 3, 2010 7:15 PM | Report abuse

NICE WIN, BABY!!!!

HTTR

Posted by: DC2AZ99 | October 3, 2010 7:18 PM | Report abuse

The Redskins played no better imo than they did against the Rams. They very nearly lost the game and would have had the receiver been any good. Doing the conservative, predictable play calling trying to run out the clock has killed this teams many times in the past. To me it's stupid to do. Rather they should continue to attack to keep the Eagles defense off-balanced. I'm not sure what happened to the passing game after the 1st half but it was atrocious. In addition, the Redskins are very lucky to have gotten some of the calls they did get and given that they put virtually no pressure on the QB, it's amazing they did win.

Posted by: Thundershock | October 3, 2010 7:27 PM | Report abuse

Never saw a team try HARDER to give a game away...BrickHands drops another one, they can't tackle to save their lives, Heyer is begging to be cut, etc.

On the other hand, was this the return of the 'Body Bag' series or what? Man, talk about knocking cats out the game...some hard hitting out there today.

Posted by: kahlua87 | October 3, 2010 7:32 PM | Report abuse

Gave them a 6 because they won the game, otherwise very lacklustre performance.

Posted by: RealConservative | October 4, 2010 9:30 AM | Report abuse

...this was the "dr. james andrews" game and I loved it. Zo Alexander with the hit of the game on teams.

Posted by: tttyler | October 4, 2010 10:54 AM | Report abuse

Isnt it amazing how many people say if Vick hadnt been injured the Redskins would have lost? If Im not mistaken Kolb was supposed to be the starter and the replacement for McNabb. And they lost. With Kolb. And Vick doesnt play DEFENSE and apparently neither did the Eagles! Stop cryin and get over it.

Posted by: MDZ28driver | October 4, 2010 12:43 PM | Report abuse

I was very happy to see the the running game actually do something. It was a big positive for the Redskins. I worry about Clinton Portis and truly hope his health is OK for the Packers.

Banks is a treat.

Pass protection seemed OK for only the first half of the game. We really need to work on that or shorten our routes. DM seemed a bit overzealous with his long passes. I love it when we hit Portis and Sellers in the flats.

The cream puff defense only survived because Kolb was rusty and very innaccurate. Tackling was atrocious for professionals. They were very close, again, to losing a huge lead because of Haslett's lack of agression. Lose that 3-4, Haynesworth knows best! BTW Haynesworth was really a bulldog in there- Always double teamed and freeing up others. Imagine if we had a 4-3?

It was great to see the 'Skins win on national TV.


Posted by: jighazelton | October 4, 2010 1:28 PM | Report abuse

I was very happy to see the the running game actually do something. It was a big positive for the Redskins. I worry about Clinton Portis and truly hope his health is OK for the Packers.

Banks is a treat.

Pass protection seemed OK for only the first half of the game. We really need to work on that or shorten our routes. DM seemed a bit overzealous with his long passes. I love it when we hit Portis and Sellers in the flats.

The cream puff defense only survived because Kolb was rusty and very innaccurate. Tackling was atrocious for professionals. They were very close, again, to losing a huge lead because of Haslett's lack of agression. Lose that 3-4, Haynesworth knows best! BTW Haynesworth was really a bulldog in there- Always double teamed and freeing up others. Imagine if we had a 4-3?

It was great to see the 'Skins win on national TV.


Posted by: jighazelton | October 4, 2010 1:28 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company