Rate the Redskins: How did they play against the Eagles?

10

we goging to win yay

there is still one quarter left

I don't think Andy Reid is going to lose sleep for trading Mcnabb after this game is said and done. And the defense is making Kolb look like Vick running the ball.

The game ain't over dik head!

All this mix-'n-match with the threads is killing me.

WTF.....KS is on crack!

The game ain't over dik head!

Posted by: rickyroge | October 3, 2010 6:46 PM

Right Hater and all week I had to sit and listen to you losers say we were gonna lose.

So eat it dikshuttlehead.

Seriously, pabrian, I think you gotta take this Skins/RI stuff a little less personally.

Lotta anger in there, my man. Hope you can work on that somehow.

Why are they posting a poll about how well they played when they game is not over?

hate to say it, but Fletcher is old!

Rogers truly sucks!

NICE WIN, BABY!!!!

HTTR

The Redskins played no better imo than they did against the Rams. They very nearly lost the game and would have had the receiver been any good. Doing the conservative, predictable play calling trying to run out the clock has killed this teams many times in the past. To me it's stupid to do. Rather they should continue to attack to keep the Eagles defense off-balanced. I'm not sure what happened to the passing game after the 1st half but it was atrocious. In addition, the Redskins are very lucky to have gotten some of the calls they did get and given that they put virtually no pressure on the QB, it's amazing they did win.

Never saw a team try HARDER to give a game away...BrickHands drops another one, they can't tackle to save their lives, Heyer is begging to be cut, etc.

On the other hand, was this the return of the 'Body Bag' series or what? Man, talk about knocking cats out the game...some hard hitting out there today.

Gave them a 6 because they won the game, otherwise very lacklustre performance.

...this was the "dr. james andrews" game and I loved it. Zo Alexander with the hit of the game on teams.

Isnt it amazing how many people say if Vick hadnt been injured the Redskins would have lost? If Im not mistaken Kolb was supposed to be the starter and the replacement for McNabb. And they lost. With Kolb. And Vick doesnt play DEFENSE and apparently neither did the Eagles! Stop cryin and get over it.

I was very happy to see the the running game actually do something. It was a big positive for the Redskins. I worry about Clinton Portis and truly hope his health is OK for the Packers.

Banks is a treat.

Pass protection seemed OK for only the first half of the game. We really need to work on that or shorten our routes. DM seemed a bit overzealous with his long passes. I love it when we hit Portis and Sellers in the flats.

The cream puff defense only survived because Kolb was rusty and very innaccurate. Tackling was atrocious for professionals. They were very close, again, to losing a huge lead because of Haslett's lack of agression. Lose that 3-4, Haynesworth knows best! BTW Haynesworth was really a bulldog in there- Always double teamed and freeing up others. Imagine if we had a 4-3?

It was great to see the 'Skins win on national TV.

I was very happy to see the the running game actually do something. It was a big positive for the Redskins. I worry about Clinton Portis and truly hope his health is OK for the Packers.

Banks is a treat.

Pass protection seemed OK for only the first half of the game. We really need to work on that or shorten our routes. DM seemed a bit overzealous with his long passes. I love it when we hit Portis and Sellers in the flats.

The cream puff defense only survived because Kolb was rusty and very innaccurate. Tackling was atrocious for professionals. They were very close, again, to losing a huge lead because of Haslett's lack of agression. Lose that 3-4, Haynesworth knows best! BTW Haynesworth was really a bulldog in there- Always double teamed and freeing up others. Imagine if we had a 4-3?

It was great to see the 'Skins win on national TV.