Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
On Twitter: RedskinsInsider and PostSports  |  Facebook  |  E-mail alerts: Redskins and Sports  |  RSS

Rate the Redskins: How did they play against the Packers?

Okay R.I. faithful, Here's your weekly opportunity to sound off on how the Redskins performed. In addition to our usual 1-10 poll, we've got a question and for Twitter users, a hashtag (#ratetheredskins) that will get your tweets included in our feed below.

Keep it clean, but otherwise, any reactions to the game are, well, fair game.





Let us know how you think the Redskins played at #ratetheredskins

By Keith McMillan  | October 10, 2010; 3:14 PM ET
Categories:  Polls  | Tags:  Packers, Redskins  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Derrick Dockery a bad fit for zone blocking scheme
Next: Redskins beat Packers 16-13 in OT

Comments

thanks landry for getting the job done when cant catch a cold carlos choked like usual!

Posted by: canda14 | October 10, 2010 5:18 PM | Report abuse

thanks landry for getting the job done when cant catch a cold carlos choked like usual!

Posted by: canda14 | October 10, 2010 5:18 PM | Report abuse

Tough battle against a good team. I'll take the win any way we can get it.

Posted by: unquiltom | October 10, 2010 5:23 PM | Report abuse

Why are people rating the Skins so high? We still have yet to put together 4 full quarters.

Great win, but this was about 1.5 good quarters of football.

Posted by: MyPostIDisAfake | October 10, 2010 6:02 PM | Report abuse

Lawd, Lawd... I thought they played well. However, I wish that they had a good white QB. They have one in Indy, Baltimore, Pittsburgh, and KC and they're all doing great!
http://GGA100.weebly.com
~ the Right Reverend Dr. Thurgood Goodlove
the Savedest man in the history of the Republican party
Youtube/Facebook/Google sensation

Posted by: kharma99 | October 11, 2010 2:53 AM | Report abuse

I wouldn't care if they gave up 500 yards. They let them get into the end zone ONCE. They were in it at the end and that all an owner, coach, and fans could ask for.

When you lose, statistics make it look worse. When you win, statistics don't mean sheite.

Give em credit for being around at the end considering how pitiful they started out.

Posted by: keedrow | October 11, 2010 8:04 AM | Report abuse

The game ball should go to the defense. They held a good team to 13 points, if we can score more than 16-19 points, we would be a serious winning TEAM! Thanks to Landry for the stop. The Rightreverend Dr. Thurgood Goodlove said what a typical jerk Replubican would say. Politics has no business in FOOTBALL. The color of the QB shouldn't matter. He's probably one of those Jack...es that sent Doug Williams hate mail. Take this fool out back and spend the cost of a cheap bullet between the eyes. Hail To The Redskins!

Posted by: rgatherssr | October 11, 2010 10:19 AM | Report abuse

Thank you Defense!! Great pressure on Rogers. Hail to the Skins!

Posted by: alyd69 | October 11, 2010 12:03 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company