Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
About The Reliable Source  |  On Twitter: Reliable Source  |  E-mail: Amy and Roxanne  |  RSS Feeds RSS Feed

Smithsonian rejects O.J. Simpson's acquittal suit

Attorney Johnnie Cochran Jr. holds onto O.J. Simpson as the not guilty verdict is read in a Los Angeles courtroom on Oct. 3, 1995. (AP Photo/Daily News, Myung J. Chun)

It's American and historic, but the Smithsonian has rejected the tan suit O.J. Simpson wore when acquitted in his infamous 1995 murder trial.

"We feel that this suit does not have a direct enough connection to represent the story of this event," said Valeska Hilbig, spokeswoman for the National Museum of American History. "This is no comment on the trial, O.J. Simpson, or the acquittal."

Smithsonian officials learned of the proposed donation in media reports Monday night. Museum curators met first thing Tuesday morning and quickly decided they wanted no part of it.

"We didn't think it was a good fit," Hilbig told us. Kind of like the famous glove, huh? Would that have made the cut? Or his white Bronco? "I couldn't tell you because we haven't thought about it."

The museum's collection is full of items with arguably less cultural significance than the "Trial of the Century": Jerry Seinfeld's puffy shirt, Bruce Willis's "Die Hard" undershirt, the camcorder from the first "America's Funniest Home Videos." But, probably for the same reason the museum turned down Monica's Lewinsky's blue dress, the outfit came with too much baggage.

The suit, shirt and tie were part of a contentious 13-year lawsuit between Mike Gilbert, Simpson's former agent (who claimed they were a gift from the former football player) and Fred Goldman, whose son, Ron, was killed alongside Simpson's ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson. Goldman wanted the suit as part of a $33 million civil judgment against Simpson. In a settlement hearing, Gilbert and Goldman agreed Monday to donate the suit to the Smithsonian or another institution.

Simpson's attorney, Ronald Slates, told our colleague Eric Athas that Gilbert originally hoped to cash in on the suit. But Simpson, serving a nine-year sentence for armed robbery, agreed to the donation only if "there's no profit for anybody."

Since the Smithsonian has declined, the suit will be offered to other museums. D.C.'s National Museum of Crime & Punishment -- which just proudly unveiled Ted Bundy's VW -- has already weighed in, saying it would love to have the suit as part of a exhibition about "people who were assumed guilty before the trial started, tried by the media if you will," said spokeswoman Linda Marie Czop. "We're not just going to stick it in a corner."

Goldman's attorney, David Cook, was confident that it would find a good home -- a media museum or maybe an institution of higher learning.

"It's going to hang in America's closet for everybody to see as the ultimate symbol of justice gone berserk," he said. "One would say it's the equivalent of John Dillinger's gun. Not all lessons have to be good ones -- some lessons are tragic."

By The Reliable Source  |  March 2, 2010; 2:20 PM ET
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Ed Smoot sizes up his daughter's new boss's swing
Next: This just in: Lil Wayne's sentencing delayed again, Tiger Woods back at home, Naomi Campbell accused of assaulting limo driver


Good. NOTHING related to oj the sleaze should ever be accepted by a museum.

Posted by: Alex511 | March 2, 2010 6:15 PM | Report abuse

Why in the world would the Smithsonian want the suit? This sounds absolutely stupid. Whoever the curator is should be fired. I personally do not think that O.J. is guilty, but why this constant badgering and now the "let take the shirt of his back" crap and give it to the Smithsonian. It just shows how low some lofty people and/or organizaitons in the US will stoop. Unbelievable!

Posted by: rkayblock1 | March 2, 2010 6:30 PM | Report abuse

Too bad OJ got only 9 years.

I thought he got life for the kidnap and robbery in Las Vegas.

This guy never runs out of hubris, even from behind bars.

Posted by: lindalovejones | March 2, 2010 6:34 PM | Report abuse

There is nothing of O.J.'s thats worth a dime except his handwritten signed confession. Oh, wait...

Posted by: waterfrontproperty | March 2, 2010 6:46 PM | Report abuse

It could go to an institution of higher learning?

It's getting difficult to be disappointed in what modern society values.

Maybe the end is near.

Posted by: James10 | March 2, 2010 7:40 PM | Report abuse

"Kind of like the famous glove, huh? Would that have made the cut?" No, that was the knife. (Sorry, couldn't resist.)

Congratulations to the Smithsonian curators for knowing the difference between notoriety and significance.

Posted by: KSVA | March 2, 2010 8:34 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company