Read this: Clinton Portis apologizes, and other Redskins pants news
Portis in the new gold uniform pants (John McDonnell/The Washington Post)
Clinton Portis apologized today for comments he made about the Ines Sainz controversy, reports our sports colleague Cindy Boren. Portis basically said in a radio interview that, hey, when a woman reporter comes into a locker room, everyone's checking everyone out... but maybe it was also the way he said it. From our colleague Dan Steinberg:
"You know, somebody got to spark her interest, or she's gonna want somebody. I don't know what kind of woman won't, if you get to go and look at 53 men's packages."
Don't flatter yourself, Clinton -- the ladies are just staring at your new bright gold pants. Steinberg gets reaction from across Skinsdom to the couture change. Says Sonny Jurgensen, a veteran of the earlier Gold Pants Era: "I like it better than I do those Good Humor outfits that they wear, all white and stuff... I liked this, oh yeah, I really did."
By
The Reliable Source
|
September 14, 2010; 5:01 PM ET
Categories:
Read This
Save & Share:
Previous: D.C. artist puts people on a boat in the buff, concerned neighbor calls cops
Next: Celebvocate: Ashanti glams it up for Boys & Girls Clubs
Clinton, what are you thinking?? I thought I heard you say in an interview that you were going to stay out of the papers this season?? New Clinton Portis?? Sounds like the old one to me.
Posted by: AudreyLMcCarthy | September 15, 2010 8:35 AM | Report abuse
We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.
User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.