Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 9:15 AM ET, 12/20/2010

Friday question answered

By Jennifer Rubin

On Friday, I asked: "Who most distinguished him or herself this week, positively or negatively, and why?"

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell was, quite deservedly, mentioned most frequently in the comments section. As Myhm put it: "This is a man who was able to convince the Republican minority to sacrifice their favorite appropriation projects in order to maintain their filibuster proof minority and stop the bill. This is the man who was able to overcome the Tea parties' influence and keep conservatives in line to push the tax deal through. In other words, he showed an amazing strength in unifying his caucus at an uncertain post-election time."

But for the sake of variety, and to pursue a reader's interesting line of thinking, I'll focus on reader moblieruss's response, which suggested another Republican lawmaker deserving of recognition:

Paul Ryan with his floor speech on the House floor directly preceding the vote (which you reported). At a time when unfounded assertions were being advanced by the extreme elements of both parties, Paul's common sense, big-picture, comments reframed the debate and prompted many to acknowledge that a durable solution to this mess will require major surgery to our tax code, reductions in government spending, and a revitalized economy through sustainable growth initiatives.

Ryan's entitlement reform plan was also recently praised by Sarah Palin, who recognized that it is perhaps foolhardy for other conservatives to try to top Ryan's wonkery.

Why was his performance worthy of note? Because he distinguished himself as the intellectual leader with the most viable approach for the next two years of conservative governance.

Last week, we saw two styles of conservative politics. One was the take-no-prisoners, make-no-deals approach personified by Republicans such as Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.), Palin, Sen. Jim DeMint and numerous talk show hosts. One suspects that political posturing has a lot to do with the no votes on the tax deal by five Republican senators and 36 House members. A case in point: In a fall interview with the Jewish Policy Center's In Focus magazine, Pence declared:

Unless Democrats take action, hard working Americans will face the largest tax increase in the nation's history on January 1, 2011. To date, Democrats have done nothing to stop the $3.9 trillion tax hike, leaving small business owners and families uncertain about their futures, and hesitant to spend, lend, or invest. With unemployment hovering near 10 percent, tax increases could not come at a worse possible time. Republicans will do everything possible to prevent these tax increases from going into effect.

But when it came to casting a vote to actually "prevent these tax increases from going into effect," Pence certainly did everything possible, not to block the increases, but to position himself as ideologically more pure than those who prevented the largest tax hike in history.

In contrast to the take-no prisoners Republicans were the Paul Ryan Republicans -- those who can see a few steps ahead, take what they can get now and lay the groundwork for a conservative budget and entitlement and tax reform. It is the antithesis of the sort of slogan-tossing and personality-driven politics that elevated the lightly credentialed Barack Obama into the White House. It is the politics that stresses policy over personality, details over rhetoric and progress over purity. The temptation to grandstand and reject all deals is great, but ultimately a losing strategy for Republicans.

In 2010, the winning gameplan was to attack and oppose Obamaism. But 2011 is about what follows Obamaism. To the extent that Ryan has jumped ahead of the pack in presenting that alternative vision, which requires short term tactics and a long term strategy, he certainly distinguished himself last week.

By Jennifer Rubin  | December 20, 2010; 9:15 AM ET
Categories:  Friday question  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Religious voters alienated by liberal agenda
Next: Is START stuck?

Comments

Ryan looks like the man in 2016, but he HAS to get out of the House and get a higher profile job.

Meanwhile, I saw Bob Corker again on CNBC this morning. He's not as charismatic as Ryan, but more ready for a run in 2012. He has both conservative credentials, and business credentials. Haven't seen his name mentioned so maybe he's not leaning in that direction, but who knows?

Posted by: 54465446 | December 20, 2010 9:24 AM | Report abuse

Compromising with Obama on taxes was bad policy because of the "junk spending." And it was worse politics because Obama will own the stabilized economy and will get re-elected. The Stupid Party strikes again.

Posted by: Inagua1 | December 20, 2010 12:17 PM | Report abuse

Read what Paul Krugman has to say about Paul Ryan's plan. I think Krugman might know a little more than Rep. Ryan.

Posted by: danw1 | December 20, 2010 3:31 PM | Report abuse

danw:

Sorry Krugman doesn't know half what he thinks he knows.

Posted by: 54465446 | December 20, 2010 3:50 PM | Report abuse

"I think Krugman might know a little more than Rep. Ryan."

Pray what reasons support that conclusion?

Unlike Ryan, Paul Krugman owns his bully pulpit solely through his leftist affinity with Pinch Sulzberger and his hit-man-from-on-high persona. He's a mere squawk box of unconstructive negativity, and has certainly not proposed a better solution to the country's unsustainable entitlements.

Whereas Rep. Ryan has done the work and published the recommendations for exactly that solution, thinking beyond the next election cycle, and is able to succinctly explain the needs and reasoning behind the plan. Like Gov. Christie, he does this WITHOUT Teleprompter. That's why he has the name and the audience.

Posted by: InsufficientlySensitive | December 20, 2010 9:03 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company