Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 4:30 PM ET, 12/16/2010

Newt Gingrich supports the tax deal

By Jennifer Rubin

Unlike five senators, Rep. Mike Pence (R.-Ind.) and a few 2012 contenders, Newt Gingrich has come out in favor of the tax deal. In fact, he put out a video expressing his support, and specifically pointing to the benefits of extending the Bush tax cuts and the payroll tax cut. (He also has come out in opposition to START and in favor of filibustering the omnibus spending bill.)

I asked a Republican insider who favors the deal why there is a split between the bulk of Republican lawmakers (some of whom may well want to run in 2012) and Pence. His take:

Part of Rep. Pence's opposition is tactical. He thinks the GOP could get a better deal. How? And is he willing to accept the potential turmoil in the markets as Republicans negotiate with the Democrats. Now, that's uncertainty. There's nothing stopping the House GOP from pushing permanent tax cuts when they take control next month. Pence could take the lead. Sure, something would be difficult to get through a Democratic Senate, but then it becomes a campaign issue for 2012. Pence prefers playing to online activists instead of dealing with the realities of the political situation."

Pence's spokesman defended his boss's position earlier today and objected to the notion that Pence was "whipping" the vote. Nevertheless, by appearing on TV, on the House floor and at a caucus lunch, Pence obviously is advocating that Republican hold out for a better deal. That continues to baffle Republican leaders. A senior advisor asked rhetorically "how the deal would get better post-January 1." Others in the House and Senate leadership expressed puzzlement as to how enough votes could be rounded up for an alternative deal, unless Congress was willing to allow taxes to rise for the next month or so and re-fight the battle in 2011.

For now, Democrats are scrambling to get votes to pass the bill. But if it fails, Republicans might then get to test Pence's premise -- namely, that objecting to a tax agreement supported by the vast majority of voters, which would prevent a mammoth tax increase, is good policy and good politics.

By Jennifer Rubin  | December 16, 2010; 4:30 PM ET
Categories:  Taxes  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Is J Street still relevant?
Next: Harry Reid didn't have the votes

Comments

It sounds like lots of Republicans are getting insecure in their support of the deal because they might appear to be helping Obama. I understand that Rush came out hard against it today.

Posted by: rcaruth | December 16, 2010 5:32 PM | Report abuse

Now there's resolve for you.

The Republicans demanded the tax cuts be extended and now they're backpedalling.

Never mind that any 'better deal' will be paid for with borrowed money.

I thought the GOP campaigned for responsible gummint during the midterms. Looks like bidness-as-usual to me.

Posted by: MsJS | December 16, 2010 6:14 PM | Report abuse

No one seems to care that the tax deal will add 900 Billion to the Debt

It is truly scary.

.

Posted by: RainForestRising | December 16, 2010 7:05 PM | Report abuse


No one seems to care that the tax deal will add 900 Billion to the Debt
It is truly scary.
Posted by: RainForestRising

No need to be scared RFR,we're already past the point of no return,in the near future,we will either default,or find new assets to balance out our debt.

Posted by: rcaruth | December 16, 2010 8:10 PM | Report abuse

I'm disappointed in Pence. Does he think he can improve the tax bill with a Democratic Senate and a Democratic President? It seems his principal issue is that the tax cuts weren't permanent. Well make that your signature issue for your campaign in 2012. The bottom line is that he can't make the bill better now so he is appealing to the extreme parts of the party. Maybe good for being a primary candidate but concerns me that he won't be able to get things done as a President. Back to Daniels I guess.

Posted by: jay22 | December 16, 2010 9:50 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company