Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 9:30 AM ET, 01/ 7/2011

Did HSBC mislead the U.S. about doing business in Iran?

By Jennifer Rubin

Last month, I reported that HSBC bank was continuing to do business in Iran. In addition, after I had contacted its spokesman for comment, the bank decided to pull an ad touting the prevalence of women filmmakers under that despotic regime.

This item was on the State Department schedule this week:

Assistant Secretary For Economic, Energy And Business Affairs Jose Fernandez: 12:30 p.m. Assistant Secretary Fernandez meets with Niall Booker of HSBC North America, at the Department of State

What's on the agenda? Well, last month, State Department Under Secretary William Burns testified before the House Foreign Affairs Committee that "Major banks like HSBC and Deutsche Bank have [emphasis added] pulled out." Burns did not say that HSBC was in the process of getting out. Did he misspeak, or has the bank misinformed the State Department?

HSBC spokesman Robert Sherman would only say this: "HSBC's policy regarding remains the same. We continue to follow the letter and spirit of laws, regulations and sanctions related to Iran in all jurisdictions. No new deals and new activity not permitted under existing sanctions."

But did the bank tell the State Department it had wrapped up its activities? Again, bank officials would not say. But a senior administration official only authorized to speak on background told me that "we were previously told by HSBC that they were out entirely, but recent statements suggest they are still in the process of unwinding their business in Iran. We are seeking to clarify exactly where things stand."

Sanctions enforcement, it seems, is no easy matter. As diligent as Treasury and State Department officials have been, it is a painstaking process to root out and police the myriad transactions that continue to keep business running in the Islamic revolutionary state. It is precisely this difficulty -- and the Iranian regime's determination to plow ahead with its nuclear program despite sanctions -- that has convinced skeptics of sanctions that stronger measures are needed to disrupt the Iranians' nuclear plans.

By Jennifer Rubin  | January 7, 2011; 9:30 AM ET
Categories:  Iran  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Morning Bits
Next: Paul Ryan leads the charge

Comments

The neocon campaigners of Iran war on the next stage of battle. To name and shape companies doing business with iran. It is Iraq all over again.

Posted by: wpost16 | January 7, 2011 10:00 AM | Report abuse

Keep fear-mongering about Iran like you did about Iraq. Being a neocon means not only never having to say you are sorry but also never having to admit you are constantly wrong.

If we are going to stop doing business with corrupt, oppressive regimes we won't have any oil. Of course, the Republicans don't want to do anything about our dependence on foreign oil other than expanding offshore drilling in the US.

Posted by: Stacyx | January 7, 2011 11:00 AM | Report abuse

Stacyx:

"Of course, the Republicans don't want to do anything about our dependence on foreign oil other than expanding offshore drilling in the US."

Not true. Alaskan oi. Shale oil. Nuclear power plants. Coal. Natural gas.

Republicans support all these efforts. But the environmental lobby, allied with the Democrats, stops virtually any sensible effort at energy independence.

But there are always windmills, right?

Posted by: gord2 | January 7, 2011 5:49 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company