Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 7:45 AM ET, 01/ 6/2011

Morning Bits

By Jennifer Rubin

Don't miss the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform's Most Ridiculous Lawsuits of 2010. My favorite: "Restaurant sued for failing to offer artichoke-eating instructions." Well, by gosh, that sounds like a tort to me!

Don't forget to bookmark the new, must-read blog on the Middle East from Elliott Abrams. You'll get analysis like this: "The New Year bombing at a church in Alexandria, Egypt has now claimed 23 lives. . . [I]t seems Egypt's police state isn't very good at policing. The security forces in 'mukhabarat states' like Egypt, where the secret police in essence run the country (with the Army standing by as the ultimate guarantor of regime survival) are there to protect the regime from the people, not to protect the people. Even when they fight terrorist groups, this is usually on behalf of regime stability rather than public safety. Egypt's Copts are now demanding something more, and we will see on Friday--the Orthodox Christmas--whether the Egyptian police will do the job."

Don't get your hopes up about a stable, pro-American Pakistan. "Lawyers showered the suspected assassin of a liberal Pakistani governor with rose petals as he entered court. . . . Even so-called moderate Muslim scholars praised 26-year-old Mumtaz Qadri for allegedly killing Punjab province Gov. Salman Taseer on Tuesday in a hail of gunfire while he was supposed to be protecting him as a bodyguard. Qadri later told authorities he acted because of Taseer's vocal opposition to blasphemy laws that order death for those who insult Islam."

Don't think you were the only one pleasantly surprised by House Speaker John Boehner's speech. "His opening ad-lib quieting thunderous applause - 'It's still just me' - should be an instructional moment in public behavior in our celebrity culture."

Don't imagine that Senator Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has it easy. "According to Senator Jim DeMint, even if a balanced-budget amendment were attached to a vote to raise the debt limit, he'd vote against it -- and he encourages freshmen Republicans not to vote for raising the debt limit either. . . .It is quite extraordinary, really. Senator DeMint is essentially urging Republicans to cast a vote that would lead to a federal default. This would have catastrophic economic consequences, since the United States depends on other nations buying our debt. . . .What Senator DeMint is counseling, then, is terribly unwise. And if the GOP were to be perceived as causing a default by the federal government, it would be extremely politically injurious." Is DeMint running for something?

Don't do what Obama did! That's White House spokesman Robert Gibbs's message to lawmakers considering voting against raising the debt ceiling. His explanation of Obama's vote in the Senate in 2006 boils down to: Since other Senators were responsible, he could grandstand. "Gibbs said Obama's vote was not necessary at the time to secure passage of the bill, which squeaked by 52-48, and that he was using the occasion to call for fiscal discipline." Who'd have thought that Obama and DeMint would have so much in common?

Don't assume that because someone is a state legislator, he has the slightest idea what the Constitution means. "A coalition of state lawmakers is preparing a showdown in various state legislatures over immigration reform, by reviving the concept of a distinct 'state citizenship' and seeking to form a separate state compact that would challenge the federal government's automatic guarantee of citizenship."

By Jennifer Rubin  | January 6, 2011; 7:45 AM ET
Categories:  Morning Bits  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Bad news day for Democrats
Next: Stalling on filibuster reform

Comments

The Egyptian, Jordanian, Lebanese, Syrian, the Palestinian Authority, and the Hamas terror regime in Gaza, and every other Arab dictatorship, autocracy, rogue regime, or absolute monarchy have the largest, most effective, and possibly the most viciously brutal police forces and security agencies in the history of mankind.
But the primary and some say the only purpose of these security forces is to insure the continued existance of the regime in power. The Western idea of the sort of routine civil police law enforcement powers, the protection of civilians, or the prevention of religious attacks is not necessarily in their purview. Indeed, in most Moslem countries, not just the Arab ones, Christians, Jews, Hindus, or any non Islamic religion, (and some semi Islamic ones like Bahai or the Druse,) are considered fair game for the Moslems. The simple truth is that except for the unfavorable international publicity and criticism that Moslem terror attacks on Jews and Christians engenders, none of these regimes really cares at all what happens to these religious minorities. In some cases, like Egypt and of course the rogue Palestinian Authority, it has been made unofficially yet brutally clear that it would like them to simply leave.

Posted by: kenhe | January 6, 2011 9:23 AM | Report abuse

I don't understand. Is democracy good for Egypt but bad for Pakistan? I thought you wanted it everywhere?

Posted by: 54465446 | January 6, 2011 10:00 AM | Report abuse

As horrific as the assassination of Governor Taseer was, one can question if it was also a political assassination. Taseer was appointed by Musharraf, not elected by anyone. Thus, the "Lawyers showered the suspected assassin of a liberal Pakistani governor with rose petals as he entered court" could be related to the lawyers' protests that forced Musharaff to finally resign.

More details were in AsiaTimes yesterday than any reporting from American or British media.

PA PM Fayyad is also an appointee, never elected. Bet he is wondering about his security detail today.

Posted by: K2K2 | January 6, 2011 12:36 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company