Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 9:30 AM ET, 01/25/2011

Republican freshman: Rep. Kristi Noem

By Jennifer Rubin

When I spoke to her by phone yesterday afternoon, Rep. Kristi Noem (R-S.D.) was still confirming her Democratic "date" for the State of the Union address. However, the new at-large congresswoman from South Dakota is not one to confuse symbolism with reality. As she put it when assessing the president, "There is a big difference between presentation and action."

She brings to Congress a down-to-earth demeanor ("Hi, this is Kristi," she begins the interview) and a no-nonsense perspective that stems, in large part, from the fact that she hasn't spent her whole life in politics. She says, "I didn't grow up in a political family." Talk at home was about ranching and farming. It was not until 2006 that she was elected to the state legislature, and she still describes herself as a "mother and small business owner."

It is that gap between the behavior of a small business owner (in her case, a family ranch) and politicians in Washington that spurred her to go to D.C. In her mind, Washington needed "someone with common sense." She says that "nothing really surprises her" about Washington, but the difference between businesses that must keep expenditures below revenue and the federal government's approach to finances is striking. "There is some logic to business," she explains. "People have had to rein in spending."

Noem beat the Democratic incumbent, Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin. As the A.P. reported:

Herseth Sandlin had won her two previous re-election bids by wide margins but faced a tough challenge from Noem in a race that drew a lot of advertising from political parties and interest groups.

The 39-year-old Herseth Sandlin sought a fourth full term in Congress as she argued she has fought against excessive spending by voting against bailouts and the health care law.

Noem tells me that excessive spending was the main factor in her race. She says, "We had someone there for years" who had sat by or actively endorsed the spending that now is responsible for our fiscal trainwreck.

Looking ahead to the State of the Union, she's not in favor of more spending, whatever Obama calls it. "I certainly wouldn't support that," she says. In her mind, Obama is still operating under the false assumption. She says, "We know government spending hasn't created jobs."

She also opposes huge pieces of regulation like ObamaCare and the Dodd-Frank financial services regulations that are "intrusive" and crush jobs. She finds a "disconnect" between Obama's new rhetoric on reducing regulation and his policy choices. "What he should be doing if he truly was concerned" about oppressive regulations that crush jobs, she says, is "to start with his health-care reform and financial regulations" legislation. She says that small businesses are struggling under the burden of oppressive federal rules, noting that the regulation requiring filing of 1099's for all health-care expenditures alone would cause businesses to close up shop.

She thinks her Republican colleagues understand the mandate from the voters. She points to the weekly effort to make spending cuts. "We started with our own budgets." Thirty-five million, she concedes, isn't a lot when it comes to the federal budget, "But it shows our dedication."

She's not following her colleagues' stunt of sleeping in her office. Showing her practical streak, she says she considered it. "And then I say how small the bathroom was." Instead, she has a small two-bedroom apartment close to the Hill. She does, however, stay close to her South Dakota constituents and goes back home every week.

As for South Dakota politics, she speaks in glowing terms about Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), who is reportedly considering a presidential run. She calls him a "strong leader" and credits him with providing her valuable advice. As for the presidency, she says, "I certainly would support him. He would be a great man to head our country."

She, like Thune, did break the pattern in South Dakota, which has been reliably in the Republicans' corner on the presidency but has sent liberal Democrats to Congress. She says, "I think in general the public in South Dakota has been attracted to the person. Now they are also finding out that they have to hold them accountable for how they vote. That's been an educational process."

As for her own learning in the ways of Beltway politics, she will have a chance to leave her mark on the Natural Resources Committee (key to her home state that has nine Native American tribes who come under the committee's jurisdiction) and the Education and Workforce Committee. (She's in favor of giving parents "flexibility" and wants to relook at the terminated D.C. voucher program "that certainly had merit.") Her ease in articulating conservative positions, her genial personality, and, candidly, her stunning good looks have already helped her make a splash among conservative activists. But ultimately, she will have to show her constituents that she is not simply another go-a-longer and really is determined to change the way Washington works.

By Jennifer Rubin  | January 25, 2011; 9:30 AM ET
Categories:  House GOP  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Aren't we supposed to cover what is going on?
Next: So much for fiscal leadership from Obama

Comments

"She says that 'nothing really surprises her' about Washington..."

I think it would help maintain her homespun image if she didn't speak about herself in the third person.

What is Ms. Noem's model for running government like a business (a monopoly, I suppose)? Won't it be hard to turn a profit and reinvest when the GOP gives away all the revenue while maxing out the credit lines? What is it she will say that government is in the business of doing? It seems to me that government is best suited for conditions of market failures - of imbalanced internalities and externalities (say, with social issues like justice, security, education, and healthcare... you know, promoting the general welfare and such). How will she run "the business of government" in the niches specifically identified as being prone to market failures?

Ms. Noem also seems rather fond of gastro-intestinal "truthiness". Where are her data to suggest that the healthcare act is a "job-killer"? Is there anyone with an IQ over 40 who blames democrats for the recession (the one that started in 2007)?

Ms. Noem seems to have either a very short memory or very limited cognitive abilities. (My money is on both.) Well done, SD.

Posted by: ncooty | January 25, 2011 11:50 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company