Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 9:30 AM ET, 02/ 2/2011

Obama should follow the governors -- the Democrats, too

By Jennifer Rubin

It is not merely Republican lawmakers, conservative critics and 29 Republican governors who are highlighting the president's decision to punt the tough calls on the deficit to the other party. Ruth Marcus points out how poorly Obama compares to California's Gov. Jerry Brown:

The man once known as Governor Moonbeam sounded more like Governor Laser Beam when it came to addressing the state's fiscal crisis.

Obama waited until minute 35 to mention the nation's "mountain of debt." He then proposed almost nothing concrete to dig out from under it - certainly nothing politically risky.

Brown began with the subject of the state's dire fiscal situation and stuck to it.

And then, as Ruth points out, Brown enumerated the hard choices he was willing to make:

Brown's budget would close about half the gap with tax increases and the other half with painful spending cuts - slashing assistance for children in low-income families, poor seniors and the disabled; health care for the poor; and education. Without the extra tax revenue, he warned, the cuts would have to go even deeper into education, prisons and health programs.

I would strenuously dispute the notion that California lacks for revenue. But at least Brown is making an effort to address his state's economic woes and is largely focused on spending reduction.

There's another Democratic governor who is also making some tough choices, New York's Andrew Cuomo. The Wall Street Journal reports:

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, calling the state "functionally bankrupt," on Tuesday proposed a budget that freezes spending on education and Medicaid and cuts overall outlays by 2.7% to fill a projected $10 billion deficit.

Mr. Cuomo said he opposed higher taxes and major new fees, in contrast with the major revenue increases backed by fellow Democratic governors in Illinois and California, which are confronting similar cash shortages.

Notice what is going on here. The Democratic governor of a deep blue state with a Democratic state assembly is doing what the president won't -- taking on Democratic constituencies in order to restore fiscal sanity. Why can't Obama do the same? It will be interesting to see what the Democratic senators from New York and California have to say about Obama's failure to show the sort of leadership that their Democratic governors are demonstrating.

The nation's governors divide largely into two camps: Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn (D) and everyone else. (Brown, I think, can fairly be put in the "everyone else" category.) Quinn is whistling past the graveyard of his state's economy, avoiding specific spending cuts and hiking taxes. (It's so bad that New Jersey Republican Gov. Chris Christie is running ads to lure Illinois businesses to his state.)

Now, it's too much to hope that Obama would be the Chris Christie of the federal government, but why shouldn't he be at least as tough and as courageous as Cuomo?

By Jennifer Rubin  | February 2, 2011; 9:30 AM ET
Categories:  Governors  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Obama: Rushing to catch up with the revolution
Next: More objections to selective outrage about the Holocaust

Comments

“Brown enumerated the hard choices he was willing to make:

“Brown's budget would close about half the gap with tax increases and the other half with painful spending cuts - slashing assistance for children in low-income families, poor seniors and the disabled; health care for the poor; and education. Without the extra tax revenue, he warned, the cuts would have to go even deeper into education, prisons and health programs.”
For Pete’s sake, give us a break!!

Kicking the struts out beneath the poor, the blind, and the halt? Those are the “tough” choices for the supporter of union thugs?!? Oh, yeah.

Puhlez! Do not hold up Brown as an example of someone making tough choices until he does something worthwhile about restraining union power in CA that makes a real difference with respect to the state’s budget . For now Brown remains a maga-hypocrite, who postures as a supporter of the little guy.

Posted by: nvjma | February 2, 2011 9:57 AM | Report abuse

The words "tough and courageous" never belong anywhere in a sentence that also includes Obama, unless the author is trying to size just how much of both Obama lacks.

Posted by: bzod9999 | February 2, 2011 11:38 AM | Report abuse

"Notice what is going on here. The Democratic governor of a deep blue state with a Democratic state assembly is doing what the president won't -- taking on Democratic constituencies in order to restore fiscal sanity. Why can't Obama do the same?"

Partially because the federal govt can print more money to address the fiscal crisis (as fraught with danger as that is) and the states can't.

If these Democratic governors go through with spending cuts and push back against the unions and turn their state's fiscal fortunes around, hopefully conservatives highlight the fact that it was conservative principles that saved the states and liberal ones that created the fiscal mess in the first place.

Posted by: RitchieEmmons | February 2, 2011 11:52 AM | Report abuse

It's like Obama has never had any executive experience and totally lacks leadership skills.

Posted by: johnhiggins1990 | February 2, 2011 1:19 PM | Report abuse

Brown to California == Nixon to China
We are all (not) Liberals now.

Posted by: aardunza | February 2, 2011 3:44 PM | Report abuse

Obama and Brown are in different spots. Obama's pay grade is higher and he has bigger fish to fry than Brown does. Obama also has some authority, which any California governor simply does not. Also, and this should be obvious, USG can print money and California can't.
The crisis of 19% real unemployment rate is far bigger than the crisis of debt in a currency which we print. It might not seem like it to Washington DC celebrity pundits, who are rich and don't know anyone without a great job.
If rich people started paying taxes again, all these problems would solve themselves.

Posted by: getjiggly2 | February 2, 2011 5:05 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company