Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 2:16 PM ET, 03/ 2/2011

Bahrain and Yemen: Two different revolutions

By Jennifer Rubin

This afternoon I spoke to the Foundation for Defense of Democracy's Steve Sotloff, who has been traveling in the Middle East, recently to Egypt and Bahrain and now en route to Libya.

Much of the news, understandably, has focused on the Egyptian revolution and the bloody massacre in Libya. But two more countries, Bahrain and Yemen, Sotloff points out, "have been inspired by Tunisia and Egypt." The regimes and popular reaction in these two countries, however, is quite different.

In Bahrain, Sotloff explains, the U.S. government "put a lot of pressure" on the regime. Under that pressure, the king ordered the military to withdraw and protesters were able to retake Pearl Square, which has become the Tahrir Square for Bahrainian protesters. The protesters, Sotloff reports, are mostly young Shiites. (Shiites make up roughly 70 percent of the country but consider themselves a repressed and discriminated-against group under the thumb of the Sunni ruling class.) Indeed the opposition party and the leading force in the protests is a religious Shiite party, although its aims and rhetoric so far have been secular.

The Bahrainian regime has expressed a willingness to sit down with the protesters, says Sotloff, although he warns that "it has promised to before but with no follow through." In Bahrain, the United States "has a lot of leverage," explains Sotloff, given its long-standing ties and the presence of our Fifth Fleet.

What could we productively do? Sotloff complains that in all of these uprisings the United States has been a "passive observer." However, he contends that "there is time for Bahrain." In addition to direct U.S. pressure for reform, Sotloff acknowledges that Saudi Arabia remains a central player and an oil supplier to the kingdom. (Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has been working with Saudis, as Sotloff suggests she should.)

Yemen, however, is an entirely different story. Sotloff thinks the regime has "seven to 10 days" and is in "very serious trouble." Sotloff describes mass defections from tribal allies of Yemen's President Ali Abdullah Saleh, strikes that have paralyzed the harbor, and angry protests calling for Saleh's ouster. In the city of Taiz, Sotloff says, there have been mass protests, while Saleh is engaged in a bloody crackdown against secessionists in the south. Sotloff notes that the United States has "invested" a lot in Saleh in the battle against al-Qaeda terrorists. But at this stage, Sotloff thinks it "is not clear he's going to survive." Moreover, he cautions that what follows may be far less friendly to the United States.

Each of these countries, as is true in Libya, Tunisia, Morocco and Egypt, has its own dynamic. But, regrettably, there is one constant. According to Sotloff, the U.S. approach has been "so discombobulated," continually lagging events. He says dismissively that while the administration wrung its hand about U.S. nationals in Libya, people "were being slaughtered." Meanwhile, the French have taken the lead in assisting the rebels. Sotloff says, "We're behind the French on this one."

Sotloff advises that in Libya, Bahrain and elsewhere, the United States still has many options to influence events. The real question is whether we have the finesse and the will to wield that influence effectively.

By Jennifer Rubin  | March 2, 2011; 2:16 PM ET
Categories:  foreign policy  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: The Politico- N.Y. Times food fight
Next: Morning Bits


What part of Speaker Boehner's "we're broke" did you not understand?

Posted by: oldabandonedbeachhouse | March 2, 2011 3:13 PM | Report abuse

oldabandonedbeachhouse, you think we're broke now? Wait until we have an oil crisis and a fiscal crisis. If Yemen and Bahrain fall, the House of Saud won't be far behind.

What would $5 or $10 gas do to our present tepid 3% GDP growth? During our last real economic boom in the 1990s, a barrel of oil cost under $20. Now it's cracked $100, and we haven't even had a major disruption of supply yet.

Posted by: eoniii | March 2, 2011 5:39 PM | Report abuse

What kind of magical thinking leads anyone to be in such denial?
Obama is a postmodeern transnational multiculturalist who is truly uncomfortable even wielding the 'influence' of a nation-state.

Not that anyone is listening to him, especially after Hezbollah kicked Said Hariri out of the PM's office while Hariri was meeting with Obama in DC. Kiss of political death...

Posted by: K2K2 | March 2, 2011 8:04 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company