Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 10:00 AM ET, 12/23/2010

Westminster Abbey strained over royal wedding?

By Autumn Brewington

Westminster Abbey (Getty)

Already, much has been said about the still-unknown cost of Prince William and Kate Middleton's wedding and who's paying for what. The Middleton family has pledged to contribute, and the royal family has promised to carry on its tradition of footing the bill for the ceremony. (This isn't a sweeping gesture; the lion's share of the expenses will relate to security and fall to British taxpayers.)

This morning, we're intrigued -- and frustrated -- by this Daily Mail article suggesting that the April 29 wedding will be a strain on Westminster Abbey:

"It is estimated that hosting Prince William and Kate Middleton's big day will cost the 1,000-year-old Abbey up to £2million.

"Much of this will be down to lost revenue as the building and its precincts will be closed to the public for a week to prepare for the event, move in television cameras and create a 'sterile' security zone."

The article quotes an unnamed "senior official involved in the planning process" as saying the payment offered to the Abbey "is a gesture -- a token fee -- and nothing more."

Sounds ominous, right? Then the article says:

"An Abbey spokesman confirmed that it would be shut to the public for several days but denied it would suffer financial hardship.

"'The Royal Family will be contributing financially but the wedding is four months away and we cannot discuss details,' he said. 'It is true that it will be shut for several days, primarily to move in the television cameras, but it is a logistical thing. ... The wedding is a routine event for us and will not be a financial strain.'"

We like a good royal story as much as the next reader. We don't like articles that seem to raise an issue only to debunk it.

By Autumn Brewington  | December 23, 2010; 10:00 AM ET
Categories:  Ceremony  | Tags:  Autumn Brewington  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Royal engagement coin, part two
Next: Looks like ... Charles and Diana's engagement photo

No comments have been posted to this entry.

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company