Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 1:29 AM ET, 01/ 1/2011

Princess Diana's role in the wedding?

By Autumn Brewington

(Getty Images)

With Kate Middleton's 29th birthday just days away, we're looking forward to lots of good royal-wedding stories to start off the new year.

After the engagement was announced, and with it the fact that Prince William had given Kate his mother's engagement ring -- the prince said that day, "It was my way of making sure my mother didn't miss out on today and the excitement and the fact that we're going to spend the rest of our lives together" -- some (notably Richard Kay, a journalist Princess Diana was known to have confided in) speculated on whether the shadow of Diana would hang over the wedding.


Comparisons
of the two women's styles are not uncommon, but the consensus has seemed to be that Diana, who was 19 when she became engaged to a prince she had interacted with on relatively few occasions, and 28-year-old Kate, who had dated William for years, are different women with different relationships -- and that this is William and Kate's wedding, so the focus should stay on them.


(Lifetime Television)

Interesting then that longtime Majesty magazine editor Ingrid Seward writes in her January letter to readers, "Although the finer details of the wedding are still open to a huge amount of conjecture, I wouldn't be surprised to see more of Diana coming through in the choice of music and hymns." She also noted, "I don't think Kate will find this daunting or strange; after eight years, she must know William better than anyone else and understand his deepest feelings."

By Autumn Brewington  | January 1, 2011; 1:29 AM ET
Categories:  Kate Middleton, Media coverage, Prince William, Royal family  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: 'A supernova in the fashion world'
Next: William and Kate walking tour, part two

No comments have been posted to this entry.

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company