Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 10:41 AM ET, 03/ 4/2011

Royal Mint issues wedding coin

By Autumn Brewington

2011-03-04T095528Z_01_LON801_RTRIDSP_3_BRITAIN-WEDDING-COIN.jpgBritain's Royal Mint is trying again -- but early reactions to its coin to mark the wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton aren't overwhelmingly positive.

If this sounds familiar, that's because it is: The mint announced a coin in December to mark the couple's engagement. The mint has marked royal milestones since 1935 -- past coins include one to commemorate the 1981 wedding of William's parents, Prince Charles and Lady Diana Spencer -- but this was announced as its first official engagement coin.

The images of the couple, however, were panned. The prince's likeness featured a prominent Adam's apple, and some questioned the accuracy of the depiction of his fiancee. (The Post's Reliable Source weighed in, asking readers to suggest who might have been the models.)

The forthcoming 5-pound coin, designed by Mark Richards, a fellow at the Royal Society of British Sculptors, is to commemorate the couple's wedding next month. The likenesses, as with the earlier coin, were reportedly approved by William and Queen Elizabeth II. (The mint's Web site notes that the government has approved these images as well.) The prince and his fiancee are shown looking at one another. A Daily Mail article on the coin's release sniffed that the bride-to-be "looks somewhat toothy, while her 28-year-old fiance has more hair on his head than has been suggested by recent photographs."

The commemorative coins can be preordered on the Royal Mint's Web site.


Photo credit: The Royal Mint via Reuters

By Autumn Brewington  | March 4, 2011; 10:41 AM ET
Categories:  Kate Middleton, Prince William, Wedding souvenirs  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Elton John invited to royal wedding
Next: Palace posts images of young Kate Middleton

No comments have been posted to this entry.

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company