Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 8:25 AM ET, 03/ 3/2011

Royal wedding Web site underwhelms

By Autumn Brewington

Just a day after the launch of Prince William and Kate Middleton's official wedding Web site, the Guardian has two less-than-impressed reactions. One is a short criticism of the site for what it presents and what it fails to say:

"Throughout their engagement, Prince William and Catherine-the-artist-formerly-known-as-Kate have attempted to, if not quite split the difference, then at least have it halfway both ways: the formal and the informal portrait photos by Mario Testino; the designer dress at the announcement and the high street dress in the photos; long-term relationship but girlfriend still remaining as silent as a chattel.

Now we come to the next stage on the happy couple's path to the bliss of kinda modern marriage, the launch of their website, which is a little reading Hello! magazine on an iPad: the vessel is modern but the content is defiantly retro."

The other pans the trend of wedding Web sites in general, noting that "a dedicated portal for stoking the coals of hot anticipation of the wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton is actually quite old-fashioned in internet terms" and that such sites "exemplify the lack of self-awareness that befalls many engaged couples: the failure to understand that most of us find it a struggle to maintain interest in other people's love stories unless they are going a bit wrong."

Meanwhile, the Mirror reports that the royal-wedding site drew more than 200,000 visits in the first eight hours.

As of Thursday morning, no new content appears to have been added to the site.

By Autumn Brewington  | March 3, 2011; 8:25 AM ET
Categories:  Kate Middleton, Media coverage, Prince William  | Tags:  Autumn Brewington  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Official William and Kate wedding Web site
Next: Elton John invited to royal wedding

Comments

I've heard William stammers but that everyone really admires his courageousness. Why can't America have a king?

Posted by: blasmaic | March 3, 2011 12:02 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company