At HUD, It's 'Portrait Portrait On The Wall'
Sure, the nation's housing industry is in free-fall from the subprime mortgage crisis. And the budget of the Department of Housing and Urban Development could be facing significant cuts. And the agency is still struggling to respond to a slew of natural disasters, including Hurricane Katrina.
But hey, that's not stopping HUD Secretary and Man About Town Alphonso Jackson from tackling another high priority: getting his official portrait painted - and pronto, on the double.
The agency has awarded what it says is a $100,000 contract to an artist in the New York area to complete Jackson's portrait and those of the four most recent past HUD secretaries - Jack Kemp, Henry Cisneros, Andrew Cuomo and Mel Martinez - all in about eight weeks time. The due date for all five portraits, which has already slipped once, is now Oct. 15.
Alphonso Jackson, speaking at the National Press Club
How will one mortal artist possibly meet the deadline? "By never leaving my studio," jokes the lucky winner of the HUD portrait sweepstakes contract, artist Daniel Mark Duffy.
Speaking to us between strokes from his studio in Newtown, Conn., Duffy said department officials gave him no indication of why they want the portraits completed so quickly. They just sent him official HUD photos of all five subjects and basically told him to get painting! Asked what he thought of the unusually tight deadline, he said, "It's extreme."
Typically, he said, it takes him "at least a month" or about 100 hours of studio time to paint a portrait from a photograph. Of course, he'd rather the HUD secretaries had sat for their portraits so "we could have had a fully realized interaction." Alas, time is of the essence.
According to the schedule put forth in the contract solicitation, a copy of which was obtained by the Sleuth, the initial sketch of each portrait was due "no later than three weeks after award date." HUD will then "endeavor to complete review and approval within five calendar days." The completed portraits are due "no later than three weeks after initial sketch approval." If those are approved, then the final framed portraits are due to the HUD program office "no later than seven days after approval."
Needless to say, Duffy is painting as fast as he can. "I've already finished Cuomo and Cisneros," the artist said (nearly panting). "I'm painting Jackson at the moment." Kemp is next.
The only foreseeable challenge he sees are the wet surfaces of the paintings. This is oil after all, he says, "and oil paintings don't ever fully dry." Therefore, Duffy will drive the portraits down to Washington himself rather than shipping them.
HUD spokesman Jerry Brown says Secretary Jackson's portrait will be hung on the wall of the new auditorium at HUD, which is under construction, after he leaves office "which he has no plans to do" before the end of the Bush administration.
According to Brown, the last HUD secretary to have an official portrait painted and hung at the agency was Samuel "Silent Sam" Pierce, whose eight-year tenure in the Reagan administration triggered a behemoth independent counsel investigation into widespread corruption at HUD - focusing on charges that the agency under Pierce's stewardship played political favoritism in awarding contracts.
Let's hope for Jackson's sake that reinstating the portrait tradition isn't an omen - Jackson came under fire last year for admitting that he urged staff to favor political pals of President Bush when awarding HUD contracts.
Duffy, who says he is a political independent, said he had "no idea" how he was awarded his $100,000 contract.
By
Mary Ann Akers
|
September 17, 2007; 3:30 PM ET
Share This: E-Mail | Technorati
| Del.icio.us | Digg | Stumble
Previous: DC Madam Case: Weirder By the Vitter (Minute)
Next: Larry Craig: Now Changes Planes in Denver
Posted by: A. Forest | September 17, 2007 10:22 PM | Report abuse
"I don't care about that damn iceberg, Lt. Small, get those painters up here to touch up the deckchairs immediately!"
Posted by: Donald Steven Burns | September 18, 2007 10:33 AM | Report abuse
Given that Mr. Jackson has been largely invisible to the public during the last 6 years, his portrait should probably be a blank canvas!
Posted by: Joan Dworetzky | September 18, 2007 10:45 AM | Report abuse
I am once again appalled by others' sense of priorities. That much $ to hang a painting somewhere when I do not have a house to hang anyting or SS disability benefits. I am grateful that "what goes around ---comes around". God bless you, but not your misguided interests,
Posted by: PegCuff | September 18, 2007 12:15 PM | Report abuse
To meet the protocols the administration has established I think they should contract this out overseas. There are really good Korean portrait from photo artists who would probably do all five & frame them for less than $10,000 and take less than a month to finish. Oh well, at least the artist will spend the money and perhaps pay taxes in the U.S.
Posted by: r man | September 18, 2007 12:29 PM | Report abuse
Perhaps those at HUD should be concerned with getting their personnel and fiscal house in order before they reward themselves with posteritorial honor.
Given their gotcha attitude toward local housing agencies, maybe they should also do some overall cleaning out of the HUD buildings across the country on the top floors not unlike the 10th floor on 7th Street in Washington, starting with Indianapolis.
Let's give more local control-they don't care about getting their pictures on the wall-just helping people with housing needs.
Posted by: Jim Colter | September 18, 2007 1:51 PM | Report abuse
Perhaps those at HUD should be concerned with getting their personnel and fiscal house in order before they reward themselves with posteritorial honor.
Given their gotcha attitude toward local housing agencies, maybe they should also do some overall cleaning out of the HUD buildings across the country on the top floors not unlike the 10th floor on 7th Street in Washington, starting with Indianapolis.
Let's give more local control-they don't care about getting their pictures on the wall-just helping people with housing needs.
Posted by: Jim Colter | September 18, 2007 1:53 PM | Report abuse
if he wants to keep his contract, the artist better not say anything negative about Bush: http://dallas.bizjournals.com/dallas/stories/2006/05/08/story1.html
Posted by: Loganer | September 18, 2007 1:55 PM | Report abuse
Jackson: "being poor is a state of mind, not a condition."
http://financialservices.house.gov/pr052004.html
Posted by: Loganer | September 18, 2007 2:02 PM | Report abuse
Daniel Duffy has a job ahead of him. As the contract states, " HUD will then "endeavor to complete review and approval within five calendar days." If anyone can obtain HUD approval of anything within 5 days, I'd like to talk with him.
30 days is the "norm" on almost anything. And some HUD employees have said they do not even look at a request until the 30th day arrives.
Posted by: pwcarter1 | September 18, 2007 5:27 PM | Report abuse
Outrageous!
Posted by: pauline walle | September 19, 2007 10:53 AM | Report abuse
Why not spend the $100,000 helping poor Americans? It seems that color photographs (nicely framed) would suffice with respect to recognizing past/present HUD Secretaries.
Also, what about the other painting contract HUD awarded this summer? The "no bid" contract to finish the "Silent Sam" Pierce oil painting?? Silent but deadly???
Posted by: Joe N. | September 19, 2007 2:38 PM | Report abuse
Great comments so far! HUD should help poor Americans instead of wasting taxpayers dollars on $100,000 oil painting contracts and $500,000 plus annual travel budgets for Secretary Jackson!! For $600,000 a lot of Katrina aid could have been dispensed!!! Shame on HUD. Too bad the HUD Inspector General is asleep at the wheel (perhaps the Lunesta was prescribed by the Bush Administration?).
Posted by: Annette Toothie | September 19, 2007 2:44 PM | Report abuse
Was the urgency documented? For example, under a fixed-price contract, where the period of performance is very short, the government pays a dear premium for the quick turn-around. Consider if the artist was given until November 30th to complete the paintings, then the price would have been significantly less. Kudos to Annette above for mentioning the HUD IG, the IG should request the documentation from the contracts department and others regarding the urgency and justification for paying the premium reflected in the short period of performance - if it even exists. This smells like a case of waste and abuse. A. Tiddle, Washington, DC
Posted by: Arthur Tiddle | September 19, 2007 4:30 PM | Report abuse
This news bothers me and I am a Republican. I think that the President should ask Secretary Jackson to step down. Our government can and should do better than this!
Posted by: Fred Freed | September 19, 2007 7:27 PM | Report abuse
As a democrat I would like to say that the goverment makes oil paintings of many dignataries and has always done that. People here are overacting.
Posted by: Tom Ingles | September 19, 2007 7:30 PM | Report abuse
Yes, sadly this is a case of bad government!
Posted by: Paul Dennet | September 20, 2007 10:33 AM | Report abuse
As a life-long Republican, this story makes me sick. This is just another case of BIG government wasting money - NOT a core value of the Republican Party!
Posted by: Ken Young | September 20, 2007 3:48 PM | Report abuse
why does HUD have a house and I don't?
Posted by: rufus | September 20, 2007 3:51 PM | Report abuse
The rushed painting/contracting deadline looks suspiciously like an end of fiscal year 'use it or lose it' spending spree.
Posted by: Jessica | September 21, 2007 2:09 AM | Report abuse
whew, at least the portraits will go up. now, what's this buzz about a housing bubble?
Posted by: Noman | September 21, 2007 7:53 AM | Report abuse
It's just crazy, straight out insane--who in the whole country outside of "Phonso" (what W calls him) Jackson's office wanted, let alone asked for, a $20,000 oil painting of Phonso Jackson, let alone Jack Kemp or any of those other guys? If you asked 100 people on the street who the secretary of HUD was, I don't suppose 95 could tell you--even less if you go back an administration or two. Ah, hell, sell another $100k in bonds to China, worry about the interest later.
Posted by: Anthony | September 21, 2007 10:33 AM | Report abuse
Why does this shock anyone? The republics have no clue. Look at Tony Snow. He leaves because he can't support his family on $185,000.00. (Plus all the other frills). These are the people who oppose a minimum wage of $8.75 per hour!!
Posted by: Shecky O'Dell | September 21, 2007 11:02 AM | Report abuse
I agree with the above comments. I think that referring to Daniel Mark Duffy as a "lucky winner" belittles his artistic abilities. The person who designed Washington D.C. could, I guess be referred to as a "lucky winner", as they chose the winner through a contest. I also agree that it is appalling the priorities of politicians and such. Giving a portrait such priority when they still haven't fully responded to crisises such as Katrina is absurd.
Posted by: colorado skiier | September 23, 2007 3:18 PM | Report abuse
Great blog - I hope that members of Congress read this! Even the Onion's fiction can't top this true story: "Phonso the Clown travels the world on half-million-dollars-plus (per year) while Katrina victims continue to suffer!"
Congress: End HUD now!
Also, "Phonso the Clown spends $100,000 on oil paintings while Katrina victims continue to suffer!"
Or, "Phonso the Clown leases yet another SUV with custom outfitting for DC Metro romps!"
The hits keep coming!!!
Posted by: John Leonhard | September 26, 2007 9:08 AM | Report abuse
to Donald Stevens Burns:
Thank you, I'm still laughing my azz off.
Posted by: jime | October 9, 2007 12:24 AM | Report abuse
Why doesn't Jackson just pay him out of his own pocket.I see that he got a $400,000 kickback on a contract in New Orleans to build some homes there.
Posted by: jime | October 9, 2007 12:32 AM | Report abuse
Miss Akers sleuthing seems to conveniently not include the fact that all of the federal Departments have oil portraits of their cabinet secretaries and at the State Department, they also includes deputy secretaries. Furthermore, the Environmental and Protection agency(EPA) recently had 11 portraits done of their former administrators and the current one since their were none ever done.Seems to be a double standard here to embarass Secreatry Jackson and what is the basis for it??
Posted by: TeL | October 10, 2007 3:58 PM | Report abuse
This is really shameful but for those outside of the Federal Government, you are lucky you don't see the sad, disgusting waste of our tax dollars that goes on every day, at much higher cost to the American people than these ridiculous paintings. I work for the USA and I get more sickened by the waste & abuse every day of my working life.
Posted by: TJ-HUD Support Staff | October 15, 2007 9:16 AM | Report abuse
dntojz gbtnvjxy lgbjwycu xsawfm ufadzbin rpegoh tvldjan
Posted by: ycmsgt lhqpotcb | November 4, 2007 3:32 AM | Report abuse
hicr obrmzlf psny nghrba nvwcjgxf wipfelys zmespjnif http://www.mikopq.drumzc.com
Posted by: dimxsag outns | November 4, 2007 3:33 AM | Report abuse
Good site! I'll stay reading! Keep improving!
Posted by: Nicole | November 10, 2007 10:09 AM | Report abuse
Bonjour.
elena eleniak elena elenia
k
On this site it is possible to find all that you need.
Goodbye.
Posted by: #random[a..z]#random[a..z]#random[a..z]#random[a..z]#random[a..z]#random[a..z] | November 28, 2007 2:46 PM | Report abuse
Yo.
fine sword canes fine sword canes
I have an information on this theme as well!
Don't forget me.
Posted by: fleurdelis87 | November 30, 2007 3:53 AM | Report abuse
Yo.
12 pains of christmas lyrics 12 pains of christmas lyrics
Enjoy my blog.
Bye.
Merry Christmas!
Posted by: christmas37259 | December 3, 2007 10:29 AM | Report abuse
Yo.
kameo porn kameo porn
Go and check out my newest blog's post!
Good day.
Posted by: adultfinder37259 | December 3, 2007 5:32 PM | Report abuse
YBpTTM doreen masturbieren ,
Posted by: Donna Evans | January 6, 2008 8:37 PM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.












Your implication that Mr. Duffy won "a lottery" and insinuation that political connections were involved in awarding this contract belittles the artist's work and talents - a quick review of his work online demonstrates why he got the job. Give credit where it's due.