Taking Amtrak, Hailing Cabs - Just Another Day For Eliot Spitzer


Eliot Spitzer and his wife, Silda, at Penn Station's taxi stand. Courtesy a Sleuth informant.

What a difference a year makes. Around this time last year, Eliot Spitzer humiliated his wife on national TV as he confessed to trysts with prostitutes. But on Saturday the Spitzers rode Amtrak - together - as if they didn't have a care in the world.

With his wife, Silda, by his side, the disgraced former governor obviously wasn't in town playing the role of "Client 9," as he was dubbed in court papers detailing the FBI's investigation of the Emperor's Club prostitution ring.

The Spitzers were spotted on the 9 a.m. Acela train from Union Station to Penn Station. They sat in business class, not first class. And she snuggled up under his overcoat to take a nap during the ride back home to New York after waiting in line at Union Station with everyone else (read: gawkers) to catch the train.

Both were dressed casually. Silda Spitzer wore "very fashionable" jeans and "looked hot, really amazing," says a regular Sleuth informant and sometimes fashion critic who was on the same train.

The former governor? Not so hot apparently. He wore casual cotton black pants, a v-neck sweater over a t-shirt, a much too wintry wool coat and white running shoes that our source says "looked goofy."

Spitzer has given a spate of TV interviews lately - CNN last week, NBC's "Today Show" this coming Monday - and has been writing columns and told-you-so newspaper op-eds about AIG, the insurance giant that aroused his suspicions when he was the state's attorney general.

His return to respectability is infuriating conservatives, if not others who wonder how a politician ruined by a sex scandal has reemerged in society seemingly unscathed, even if he did lose his job.

Perhaps the train ride was just part of Spitzer's public resurrection - as a regular person who rides Amtrak and hails cabs. After arriving at Penn Station late Saturday morning, the Spitzers stood in the taxi line on 8th Ave. for several minutes, just like everyone else.

By Mary Ann Akers  |  April 4, 2009; 2:23 PM ET
Share This:  E-Mail | Technorati | Del.icio.us | Digg | Stumble Previous: House Ethics Committee Takes Tough Action (Against Nothing)
Next: Sarah Palin vs. ex-Future Son-in-Law Levi Johnston

Comments

What a good thing it is to think that the Spitzers together may have survived this public raking over the coals. Only in America could a highly gifted and intelligent governor be figuratively scourged for a personal addiction that remains in the illegal realm because of our priggishness. Yes, he should have "known better," but that's the nature of addiction -- to power, money, sex, and the list goes on. I for one hope his talents are not long lost to us.

Posted by: burk1 | April 4, 2009 4:30 PM | Report abuse

I wish the column weren't quite so catty. If you subscribe to the notion that the private life of a public person is public business, I suppose you could say that Spitzer brought it on himself. But why should that be? Why can we not accord some dignity to our elected officials? Why does our society stare with such feverish and hawklike intensity at the private doings of public persons? That has always been a mystery.

I think we were much better off when the private life of Eisenhower or Kennedy, not to mention Franklin Delano Roosevelt, was respected as just that -- a private life, not for the cheap amusement of the public. What have we gained, besides some prurient satisfaction? We have deprived the country of the superior services of dedicated individuals -- and what have we gained by doing that? The sale of more newspapers? More gossip for CNN? Whooosh!

Posted by: dicesare1 | April 4, 2009 4:39 PM | Report abuse

I stood next to the Spitzers last night in Union Station; they were picking up presumably one of their sets of parents, who arrived at Union Station at 7:30 p.m. No one recognized him standing there at first, but then some people started shaking his hand. Surprised me that people would want to shake his hand -- celebrity always trumps whatever indescretion. Sad.

But, yes, his wife was fetchingly elegant. I can't imagine what she goes through appearing in public with him, people surreptitiously snapping photos with their cell phone cameras.

Posted by: LisOsc | April 4, 2009 4:40 PM | Report abuse

Spitzer is a disgusting pig. His wife obviously loves his money more than her own dignity (or health, given his preference for unprotected sex with multiple partners). I wouldn't vote for him (or her) for the lowest office in the land.

How desperate are Democrats to support this guy?

Posted by: WashingtonDame | April 4, 2009 4:52 PM | Report abuse

My hat goes off to both of them.

Posted by: svreader | April 4, 2009 7:43 PM | Report abuse

Glad Mrs. Spitzer is paying more attention to her appearance now. Maybe she will keep her man. My wife always looks hot and it helps keep me interested. It is not so important what you got, ladies; it is how you package it that counts.

Posted by: Bitter_Bill | April 4, 2009 8:41 PM | Report abuse

This is America; all are allowed a chance for redemption. Good luck to both of them.

Posted by: The_Inspector_General | April 4, 2009 8:55 PM | Report abuse

If the adulterous pudgy hypocritical t*rd Gingrich can reascend to respectability, why not Spitzer? As opposed to nitwit Newt, Eliot has a brain and was actually correct in raising red flags about A.I.G., among other Wall Street miscreants. And anyone who causes ultra-conservatives to have torturous migraines is okay by me.

Posted by: free9604 | April 4, 2009 10:13 PM | Report abuse

He deserved what befell him. I'm glad to see that his marriage has survived and apparently prospered. Sometimes each of us gets off more easily that any of us truly deserved. I hope he understands that, and is thankful for it.

Posted by: Miss_Hogynist | April 4, 2009 10:23 PM | Report abuse

Welcome to: SpitzerAG.com

FBI examines extent of insurance industry fraud
WASHINGTON, May 4 (Reuters) - The FBI has been looking for nearly a year into whether accounting problems and other corporate fraud schemes might present a pervasive problem for the insurance industry, FBI officials said on Wednesday

U.S. Senator Bill Nelson's MONY Investigation

more info @ www.GonzalesAG.com

Subj: SpitzerAG.com / Fraud report
Date: 05/17/2004
To: albany@fbi.gov, Elizabeth.Lara@tdi.state.tx.us, dallas@FBI.gov
CC: dennis.nally@us.pwcglobal.com, CutlerS@sec.gov, Dick.Silver@axa-financial.com
ASamers@ins.state.ny.us, glassmanC@sec.gov, Degenhardth@sec.gov, eliot_spitzer@oag.state.ny.us,, Diane-Koken@ins.state.pa.us, dfw@sec.gov, Barrett.Denum@co.travis.tx.us, , DDopp@oag.state.ny.us, ClarksonJ@sec.gov

SpitzerAG.com

FACT: New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer knowingly turned his head and looked the other way when he found that the financial statements of the Mutual of New York (MONY) were fraudulent, that the company had been taken public with fraudulent statements and opinion letters that PricewaterhouseCoopers had knowingly falsified and that a massive fraud on the public had occurred. This CUT & RUN SCUMBAG took the cowards way out of a mess that he got into while polishing his own image as a crime fighter!

During 1999 Spitzer and Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal investigated MONY's sale of ponzi retirement policies to dairy farmers in New York and Connecticut and fined the company while obtaining restitution for the farmers. Both of the scumbags then ignored hundreds of thousands of other policyholders who were similarly situated and had been victimized by corporate THUGS at MONY and PricewaterhouseCoopers. They knowingly entered into a criminal conspiracy to aid other regulators in hiding the criminal wrong doing that originated in the early 80s.

Posted by: rabshire | April 4, 2009 11:59 PM | Report abuse

Good luck to him, and to them. He was always a smart, talented man and I'd like to see him fully redeemed.

Posted by: unojklhh1 | April 5, 2009 1:58 AM | Report abuse

I have nothing against Spitzer hiring a hooker. Prostitution should have been legal anyway. But I do find it troubling that he was on the offensive against those same activities before the scandal befell himself. That's hypocrisy.

Posted by: starclimber9 | April 5, 2009 11:38 AM | Report abuse

Am I in the right section? I could've sworn I was reading "Reliable Source."

Posted by: mattintx | April 6, 2009 11:18 AM | Report abuse

"His return to respectability is infuriating conservatives, if not others who wonder how a politician ruined by a sex scandal has reemerged in society seemingly unscathed, even if he did lose his job."

ummm...hello? David Vitter ring a bell? And as another poster said, what about Gingrich, who's on what, his third wife, dumping #2 in less than glorious fashion? I'm no fan of what Spitzer did, which as a human was just plain gross and Hubris run amok. His wife has her own reasons for staying which truly are no one's affair but their own. But conservatives should get off their ridiculous platform and get a grip. Those who live in glass houses.....

Posted by: TooLongInWashington | April 6, 2009 11:45 AM | Report abuse

So what's he supposed to do -- die? Seriously, what do people who become fodder for America's scandal mill do with the rest of their lives? The guy paid a heavy price, in loss of position and public humiliation, for a victimless crime. If he and his wife have preserved their marriage, I think we might be happy for them rather than stalk them and post inane comments about their clothing.

Posted by: DavefromDetroit | April 6, 2009 11:52 AM | Report abuse

...what, no comments about whether she was able to sit through the whole train-ride with ease, or seemed rather uncomfortable the whole time?

I personally think that he wears white running-shoes to make it easier to chase after hot teenagers and offer them money for anal sex before they disappear from sight.

Posted by: dubya19391 | April 6, 2009 12:35 PM | Report abuse

The hypocrisy of the "infuriated conservatives" infuriates me. What did Spitzer do that was any different than "Mr. Family Values" David Vitter, who didn't even lose his job?

Posted by: jackiestone | April 6, 2009 3:54 PM | Report abuse

Mr. Spitzer deserves to get back to a regular life. He has every right to write and speak the truths as he knows them. Only republican hypocrites would be outraged over Mr. Spitzer and what he does. He is a very intelligent man and has much to offer.

Posted by: fedup11 | April 6, 2009 11:35 PM | Report abuse

There's really no secret as to why Spitzer has been able to dodge the proverbial "poo". Most Americans are adulterers....and that's the bottom line!

He's just a normal guy like the rest of us. Sad, isn't it?

Posted by: shnide | April 7, 2009 12:54 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2009 The Washington Post Company