If the Playoffs Started Today.....
I was excited earlier this year when MLS presented its playoff format for this season. Instead of the usual conference pairings -- and for D.C., an inevitable matchup with New York and then New England -- there was the possibility of, say, Chicago vs. Chivas USA or D.C. vs. Dallas in the first round. But alas, MLS clarified the playoff structure a few weeks ago and, with the exception of one minor wrinkle, we're back on a predictable course of true conference pairings.
The one change is with the number of teams from each conference based on overall points. In theory, a fifth-place club (or even a sixth-place team) in the East could earn a berth ahead of a third- or fourth-place team in the West. In that case, the extra Eastern team(s) would join the Western playoff bracket.
The way things have unfolded, the West will get a maximum of four teams in the playoffs this year, possibly just three. Here's how it looks at the moment. I am basing the seeds not on overall points (because teams have played an uneven number of matches), but on points per game.
1. D.C. 42 points in 22 games = 1.909
2. N.E. 42/23 = 1.826
3. N.Y. 36/23 = 1.565
4. K.C. 33/24 = 1.375
5. Columbus 28/23 = 1.217
6. Chicago 26/22 = 1.181
7. Toronto 20/22 = 0.909
1. Chivas 36/20 = 1.800
2. Dallas 36/22 = 1.636
3. Houston 39/24 = 1.625
4. Colorado 28/23 = 1.217
5. RSL 18/21 = 0.857
6. L.A. 14/19 = 0.736
Colorado and Columbus are tied for the final berth. In head to head, the teams have played a pair of ties, including yesterday, but the Rapids' goal differential is -2 compared to the Crew's -3. So Colorado gets it.
Your first-round matchups would be:
What do you think of the playoff format? Acceptable? Should they have thrown all teams together to get inter-conference matchups? Or, dare I say, is one table the way to go in the future for regular season play? (I don't think it will ever happen, but certainly worth discussing.)
The comments to this entry are closed.