Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
On Twitter: SoccerInsider and PostSports  |  Facebook  |  Sports e-mail alerts  |  RSS

A Few Minutes With Mia Hamm

At halftime of this Sunday's WPS match at Maryland SoccerPlex, the Washington Freedom will honor former players Mia Hamm and Siri Mullinix. Hamm, the U.S. national team legend and women's sports icon, told the Insider yesterday that "I'm so grateful to be honored this way. I loved my time there. I loved the city. I loved the people. I am excited to come back, cheer on the team, see some old friends. Are the cherry blossoms still out in Washington?"

Married to Oakland Athletics player Nomar Garciaparra and raising 2-year-old twin girls, Hamm, 37, spends much of her time at the family home in Southern California. Though she is retired, she has a unique presence in the new league: Hamm is the silhouetted player in the WPS logo.

Her thoughts on the rebirth of women's pro soccer?
(keep reading)

"I think it's great. I was there at the first game and I've watched a lot of games on TV. I'm so impressed with the level of play. The personality is starting to show on the field and we are in communities that really embrace the game, which is so important."

She continues to serve as a mentor of sorts for Freedom star Abby Wambach, who played alongside Hamm for two years in the WUSA.
"She has always been someone who wanted the responsibility and took on a lot as a young player and even more now. She has grown into that leadership role and done a tremendous job. She takes every loss, every empty seat personally and she will do everything she possibly can to help her team win and help this new league succeed. She is so committed to the game."

The Freedom (1-2-1) will host Hope Solo and St. Louis Athletica (0-2-1) at 6 p.m. Sunday at the SoccerPlex. The match will be shown live on Fox Soccer Channel.

By Steve Goff  |  April 30, 2009; 11:30 AM ET
Categories:  Freedom , Women  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Not-See TV, Coin Flip, Fire, Copa
Next: Local Pro Matches This Weekend

Comments

I'll never forgive Nomar Garciaparra.

Posted by: sitruc | April 30, 2009 11:37 AM | Report abuse

MEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!

Sorry, flashback to 1999.

Posted by: I-270Exit1 | April 30, 2009 12:10 PM | Report abuse

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Posted by: no_recess | April 30, 2009 12:52 PM | Report abuse

The Post's non-coverage of Sunday's Washington Freedom game versus FC Gold Pride set a new standard for "pathetic ["Freedom Wins 1st," Apr. 27]." This was a breakthrough game on so many different levels that the paper's actions defy logic. It marked the breakout of Abby Wambach, who scored two goals and provided an assist on a third. Other news sources mentioned that a game the previous day, between Chicago and Boston, set a new Women's Pro Soccer record with four goals by one side. Not only did the Freedom equal that, the final 4-3 score also meant that it was the highest scoring match of any WPS game to date. Wambach's second goal couldn't have been more thrilling, coming off a header from a free kick in the waning seconds of stoppage time in the second half. The Post's sports department devoted three columns to D.C. United's victory, which also came off a goal scored late in second half stoppage time. The Freedom and WPS deserved far better coverage for this match than the Post gave it. Instead of journalism, The Post's readers were "treated" to a story that was crafted with all the care and attention to detail of a text message.

Posted by: hofbrauhausde | April 30, 2009 12:57 PM | Report abuse

So you wait for a posting related to WPS and the Freedom and then go on about pathetic coverage. Interesting strategy...

Posted by: teo_68 | April 30, 2009 1:16 PM | Report abuse

I'm thinking Hofbrauhausde might be that guy that walked around the concourse at halftime with the wrinkled up "Save the WUSA" sign for the last few years.

Posted by: Henchlow | April 30, 2009 1:19 PM | Report abuse

Unfortunately, there is not nearly enough interest in this team at this time to justify sending a staff reporter on the road or hiring a freelancer, and devoting additional space in the shrinking print edition to road games. Even if the team were to sell out every home game at SoccerPlex, that's only 5,000 fans, which pales in comparison to D.C. United and other local pro teams. The area minor league baseball teams, which have drawn well for many years, receive zero coverage for home and away games.

We will continue to have a reporter and, at times, a photographer at each and every Freedom home match. We will also continue to provide occasional feature stories, such as the big front-pager on Joanna Lohmann's dual career.

Another issue with Freedom road games is the lack of coverage from the Associated Press, which does not have the resources to follow WPS, making it much more difficult for news organizations to present stories in the print edition.

For future Freedom home games, you will see plenty of coverage in the print edition and on the web site's sports front. But for road matches, your best bet is this blog.

Posted by: Steve Goff | April 30, 2009 1:26 PM | Report abuse

Does the WPS not have their own or stringer writers to provide match reports that are at least posted to the WPS web site? I know MLS provides this service, so you can usually read up on other teams matches in this way. I realize that the league is trying to keep costs down in a challenging economic environment but there is interest in the league even though major media outlets as Goff states are providing more limited coverage.

Posted by: sbg1 | April 30, 2009 1:41 PM | Report abuse

@hofbrauhausde,

You want it - you pay for it!

Posted by: VirginiaBlueBlood | April 30, 2009 1:41 PM | Report abuse

If you would like to see more Freedom coverage in the print edition, feel free to contact the sports editor, Matt Vita, at vitam@washpost.com

However, in these difficult economic times as media organizations are stretched thin, the chances of increased coverage of a first-year team (regardless of the sport) that draws only a few thousand fans isn't very promising. It's not a high priority.

Sorry, but that's the reality.

Posted by: Steve Goff | April 30, 2009 1:46 PM | Report abuse

Steve, your explanation is well-taken, but it's a little like the horse and the cart, isn't it? Your opening logic is that there's not enough interest for the team to justify more coverage, but doesn't media coverage help drive interest and build momentum? And your comment about the 5k fans in the stadium doesn't take into account fans who watch the game on TV. Maybe the WaPo would serve their readers better by taking some "ownership" of the team and get a little creative about coverage. At least online if not in print (I'm in FL.)

Posted by: tm34 | April 30, 2009 1:52 PM | Report abuse

[snip] Other news sources mentioned that a game the previous day, between Chicago and Boston, set a new Women's Pro Soccer record with four goals by one side. Not only did the Freedom equal that, the final 4-3 score also meant that it was the highest scoring match of any WPS game to date. [/snip]


Posted by: hofbrauhausde | April 30, 2009 12:57 PM

It seems kind of early in it's infant history for WPS to make a big deal everytime a "WPS record" is set. I can remember when Eric Wynalda was the all-time leading MLS scorer.

Not that there's anything wrong with hofbrauhaus wanting more coverage. Or more beer.

Posted by: Joel_M_Lane | April 30, 2009 1:55 PM | Report abuse

It's not the job of the Post to take 'ownership' of the league (an attitude that hardly squares with journalistic ethics) or to try and build it up in any way. If they owe it to WPS do they then owe it also to arena football, women's football, professional lacrosse, the club cricket circuit?

WUSA failed because they confused media coverage for popular support, perhaps it is time to concentrate on the latter and assume that when justified the former will follow.

Posted by: teo_68 | April 30, 2009 1:57 PM | Report abuse

In Munchen steht ein Hofbrauhaus
Eins, zwei, g'suffa!

Posted by: OWNTF | April 30, 2009 2:04 PM | Report abuse

But, wait...Steve...you mean economic reality forces people to make hard choices, choices that not every fringesport nut is going to agree with? Imagine that.

hofbrauhausde, if you KNEW all of that stuff WITHOUT the Post, then YOU, yourself, didn't NEED the Post to cover the story, right? You got the information, right? You just want validation that your favorite sport/league/team has the seal of approval of the Washington Post, then, right? That's all it is, really.

Because you can GET the information you need in today's society. You don't NEED to have your local paper do it (one reason papers are going away). But you WANT to see it in the paper because it makes you feel better about being a fan.

Well, we all give you permission to feel great about being a fan. Whether it's a fan of WPS and the Freedom or you like quilting or bingo or NASCAR or whatever it is. You don't need to have it validated by coverage in the paper. It's incredibly immature to whine about it.

Posted by: very_clever_username | April 30, 2009 2:07 PM | Report abuse

It's incredibly immature to whine about it.

Posted by: very_clever_username | April 30, 2009 2:07 PM | Report abuse

==============================

Actually there are a huge number of entries on this blog every week by "fringesportnuts" whining about inadequate US coverage of mens soccer. So why you jumping on hofbrauhaus?

Posted by: OWNTF | April 30, 2009 2:19 PM | Report abuse

WPS does indeed provide match reports and video highlight packages on their new website: www.womensprosoccer.com

I agree it was a shame that last weekend's thriller got no coverage here. Fans can always post summaries/observations on this blog, which was all but dead during and after that match. Or even better, if you're a polished writer, nothing to lose in submitting your own writeup to Mr. Vita. I'm sure the squad and other fans would appreciate it.

As for the level of soccer in WPS, it's no BS. They have not pulled in enough internationals to reach the level, say, of the Women's World Cup, but they are indeed very close to that level.

Posted by: Godfather_of_Goals | April 30, 2009 2:27 PM | Report abuse

I think there should at least be a link on the "soccer" page of the website to the Freedom's record, WPS standings, etc.

Oh, and if things are that bad at the post, i'm willing to pay $25/day (or some equivalent to a normal newspaper subscription) to view the website so that there is adequate coverage of material important to me. Heck, i'd pay it just for this blog to be honest, but i might be in the minority.

Posted by: Brian76 | April 30, 2009 2:39 PM | Report abuse

whoops, i mean 25 cents/day...definitely not $25

Posted by: Brian76 | April 30, 2009 2:40 PM | Report abuse

FSC is re-broadcasting the last game tonight at 11 pm. Doubters, check it out.

Posted by: OWNTF | April 30, 2009 2:43 PM | Report abuse

MLS needs all the help it can get -- no resources should go to WPS. I shouldn't even be posting in this thread.

Posted by: Reignking | April 30, 2009 2:46 PM | Report abuse

I would have covered that game.

-- Hope Solo

Posted by: joedoc1 | April 30, 2009 2:47 PM | Report abuse

But, wait...Steve...you mean economic reality forces people to make hard choices, choices that not every fringesport nut is going to agree with? Imagine that.

hofbrauhausde, if you KNEW all of that stuff WITHOUT the Post, then YOU, yourself, didn't NEED the Post to cover the story, right? You got the information, right? You just want validation that your favorite sport/league/team has the seal of approval of the Washington Post, then, right? That's all it is, really.

Because you can GET the information you need in today's society. You don't NEED to have your local paper do it (one reason papers are going away). But you WANT to see it in the paper because it makes you feel better about being a fan.

Well, we all give you permission to feel great about being a fan. Whether it's a fan of WPS and the Freedom or you like quilting or bingo or NASCAR or whatever it is. You don't need to have it validated by coverage in the paper. It's incredibly immature to whine about it.

Posted by: very_clever_username | April 30, 2009 2:07 PM | Report abuse


So therefore the paper should cover nothing right? Everything is available somewhere else. The reason I read the post is for the high quality journalism (usually). I like to read the writer's stories and particularly like the editorial section and journalist's points of view that you don't get elsewhere... like Goff but also the blogs on travel, wine, and the movie review guy is hilarious (even if i rarely agree with him). So we'd like a local slant on our news about our local team, instead of a national one...whats wrong with that?

Posted by: Brian76 | April 30, 2009 2:48 PM | Report abuse

In Munchen steht ein Hofbrauhaus
Eins, zwei, g'suffa!

Posted by: OWNTF | April 30, 2009 2:04 PM | Report abuse
==============

Best thing I've read all day.

Let's see: the Business section is folded into Section A, Book World is gone, long-time Post staff have been taking buyouts, copy editing is contracted out overseas, Emilio is gone from Sports, and someone is worried about Post coverage of Freedom away games?

Potomac Soccer Wire has good write-ups of home games. You might even see reports of away games there, if their reporter is watching TV and not at the rifle range.

Posted by: I-270Exit1 | April 30, 2009 2:49 PM | Report abuse

There are plenty of replays on the WPS site. Not to mention other goodies worth peepin'. The WPS logo is awfully nice. Anyone else think the MLS logo sucks?

Posted by: DadRyan | April 30, 2009 2:54 PM | Report abuse

Thoughtful comments by everyone. Thanks!

I forgot to mention earlier that we did hire a freelance writer based in Los Angeles to cover the Freedom's first road game and had him write a 600-word story. That match received greater coverage because the "event" (first game in league history) was bigger than the actual game and, in our best judgment, was of greater interest to the casual reader.

In response to whether we should promote the team to generate interest.....that's not our role. If people are climbing over fences to see the Freedom (who already have name recognition in the area based on their WUSA history), we will adjust accordingly. As of right now, the team's season ticket base and attendance figures in general are very small compared to other pro teams that receive regular coverage in The Post. The Freedom IS getting coverage, however. Meantime, the Bowie Baysox, arena football league team, pro softball team and women's football team receive zero coverage and the pro tennis team that includes an international superstar (Serena Williams) who transcends her game only receive a bit. How much have we done with college lacrosse this spring, which will draw 50,000 (!!) for the final four in a few weeks?

Posted by: Steve Goff | April 30, 2009 2:55 PM | Report abuse

wait... there's a woman's soccer league again?

Posted by: lylewimbledon | April 30, 2009 2:55 PM | Report abuse

wait... there's a woman's soccer league again?

Posted by: lylewimbledon | April 30, 2009 2:55 PM | Report abuse


Given that you read the article then commented on it, you've obviously heard of it.

Posted by: stwasm | April 30, 2009 3:18 PM | Report abuse

Oh my god; some of you act more spoiled than my 4 year old (and that's a pretty tough standard to beat).

You have great soccer coverage in the Post, and you're complaining that there wasn't a full page write up for one match? Give me a break. I moved to Colorado; they have 15 writers covering the Broncos, and the Rapids are luck to get 5 lines. Just friggin deal with it! IF you want news on the WPS and there's no coverage in the Post then look online.

Im sorry, im still pissed the Mia never returned my phone calls when she was single...... Friggin Nomar....

Posted by: hacksaw | April 30, 2009 3:21 PM | Report abuse

Sarcasm...

we will see if it makes it through the year...another horrible idea.

Posted by: lylewimbledon | April 30, 2009 3:30 PM | Report abuse

Looking forward to Sunday

"Reasons To Be Cheerful, Part 3":

* Mia Hamm
* Hope Solo
* Lori Chalupny

Any Ian Drury fans still alive out there?

Posted by: OWNTF | April 30, 2009 3:32 PM | Report abuse

Lock and load...

Heard of Ian Drury? Indeed -- tore my MCL. Hurt like heck.

Posted by: joedoc1 | April 30, 2009 3:39 PM | Report abuse

Even if WPS gets the talent level that is present during the Women's World Cup, it'll still be like watching Men's soccer played on a 6inch lake of molasses.

Posted by: alecw81 | April 30, 2009 3:43 PM | Report abuse

then don't watch it butthead. Seriously, why bother to read through 30 posts just to post this bullsh*t?

Posted by: OWNTF | April 30, 2009 3:49 PM | Report abuse

I would have covered that game.

-- Hope Solo

Posted by: joedoc1 | April 30, 2009 2:47 PM | Report abuse


Epic.

Posted by: JkR- | April 30, 2009 3:50 PM | Report abuse

Steve, once again your comments are well taken about all the other sports that don't get any coverage - and you're right about that. But the difference is that soccer is an international sport with a global following, unlike those other sports you mentioned. Having international soccer stars like Marta and others will help to build the fan base here in the U.S. When you watch Gold Cup and Olympic matches, you get a sense of the sport and (contrary to acting like spoiled 4-year-olds like Hacksaw says), I think there are just expectations that the sport will continue to attract at least some level of media coverage. That is the fundamental difference also between the WUSA and WPS. Just saying. Appreciate what coverage we get, but hoping, and yes, expecting more.

Posted by: tm34 | April 30, 2009 3:56 PM | Report abuse

Sarcasm...

we will see if it makes it through the year...another horrible idea.

Posted by: lylewimbledon | April 30, 2009 3:30 PM | Report abuse


What OWNTF said!

Posted by: stwasm | April 30, 2009 3:57 PM | Report abuse

@Posted by: tm34 | April 30, 2009 3:56 PM | Report abuse


Please tell me you're not lecturing Mr Goff on the universal appeal of the sport he has covered since the 80's?

Posted by: JkR- | April 30, 2009 4:06 PM | Report abuse

A Few Minutes With Mia Hamm... but not for Hacksaw, certainly. Dude, I think there's gonna be a color photo of you in the hands of every security guy at SoccerPlex this weekend (or is it "the" SoccerPlex"?)

Did someone say the 80s?!

"The Arizona sky
The sky is bigger there
It took my breath away
That doesn't happen every day

Manhattan's music, man
On every avenue
You've heard no greater sound
Too much can get you down..."

Posted by: joedoc1 | April 30, 2009 4:30 PM | Report abuse

You guys are pretty lucky to have the soccer coverage the Post has. The Boston Globe switched Frank Dell'Apa, who still writes soccer for ESPN, to the Celtics (Imagine if this blog was discontinued and Goff was switched to the Wizards). Yeah, that's the Boston Globe. The only time I ever saw the Revs anywhere near the paper (coverage is online, if at all) was when they tackled that dude on the airplane- and then, like any other Boston media source, forgot to cover the actual game the team was heading to.

The Washington Post is doing a good job with soccer coverage, and you are very lucky to have it. As much as I want to see more on the Freedom, I think with all the economic restrictions and the fact that the WPS isn't very popular, that the Post is doing a good job with what they have. Especially with the number of DC United fans who will never, ever, read or watching anything soccer related

I'm in school for journalism, if they want someone willing to do write-ups on the games in Boston this summer for free, I'm willing to do it ;)

Posted by: revsfanindc | April 30, 2009 4:32 PM | Report abuse

I think Carlos Valderrama should be the silhouetted player in the MLS logo.

Or Khumalo.

It is heartening that Freedom coverage is better than that of the arena football team. That surprised me, I'd thought they'd get a front-page spread for their debut.

Posted by: fallschurch1 | April 30, 2009 4:36 PM | Report abuse

correction: DC United fans who will never read anything WPS related... ooops

Posted by: revsfanindc | April 30, 2009 4:36 PM | Report abuse

Ian Drury? Isn't he Shearer's assistant at Newcastle?

I saw him live in 1989. Thought I was the only one here old enough to know him.

Posted by: BlackandRedRedDevil | April 30, 2009 4:46 PM | Report abuse

Ian Drury? Isn't he Shearer's assistant at Newcastle?

I saw him live in 1989. Thought I was the only one here old enough to know him.

Posted by: BlackandRedRedDevil | April 30, 2009 4:46 PM | Report abuse

You Blockhead...


:)

Posted by: JkR- | April 30, 2009 4:53 PM | Report abuse

If you were only calling her, you weren't trying hard enough, hacksaw. I'll never be pissed at Mia even for the whole Lake Braddock thing. I'm just mad people insisted I was stalking her when I was just getting a ride to a high school soccer game a couple blocks away from where she lived.

Posted by: sitruc | April 30, 2009 4:58 PM | Report abuse

As of right now, the team's season ticket base and attendance figures in general are very small compared to other pro teams that receive regular coverage in The Post.

==================================================================

By that standard, you should stop writing about the Nationals.

Posted by: hofbrauhausde | April 30, 2009 5:11 PM | Report abuse

The Nationals, even in their current dismal state, have 12,000 season ticket holders. The Freedom has maybe 900?

I am willing to have a reasonable conversation about Freedom coverage, but bringing the Nats, Caps, United and Wizards into the discussion is a non-starter.

Posted by: Steve Goff | April 30, 2009 5:52 PM | Report abuse

The Freedom games are a wonderful sport environment. The Freedom play really top quality soccer and the crowd is cheerful, friendly and it's just a lot of fun. This is a global sport and US women and this league can define the best. I would think that The Washington Post should see a great deal of complementary brand elements in covering the Freedom.

Posted by: soccerdad1again | April 30, 2009 5:58 PM | Report abuse

I understand your position, but the bottom line is that, at the moment, there is just not much interest in the team compared to other regular beats. And with a finite amount of space available in a shrinking print edition and our staff strained by print and web duties, the Freedom is low on the pecking order. If interest in the team increases dramatically (attendance, season tickets, reader feedback), the coverage will increase. That said, we are commited to covering the home games, writing occasional features and keeping you updated on a blog devoted to soccer. That's the best I can offer for now.

Posted by: Steve Goff | April 30, 2009 6:30 PM | Report abuse

Mr. Goff, how many US dailies sent a reporter to China for WWC?

Posted by: OWNTF | April 30, 2009 6:51 PM | Report abuse

Why do we need away game coverage of Freedom matches anyway? Aren't the players twittering?

Posted by: I-270Exit1 | April 30, 2009 7:16 PM | Report abuse

hofbrauhaus, OWNTF, I-270 (others). Meet in the biergarten 5 minutes before halftime at Athletic match. Wear a USMNT hat or jersey. We shall conspire together to fill the void.

Code word = "I will have two fillings."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Eifa8oqCRU

Goffer beware!

Posted by: MR1Caretaker | April 30, 2009 8:57 PM | Report abuse

Wait, I meant to write wear a USMNT or USWNT hat of jersey.

Posted by: MR1Caretaker | April 30, 2009 8:59 PM | Report abuse

dummest thing ever.
Dallas being nocked out of the open cup and the memory of losing is so close to their mind they will likely come hard. What's the best approch to beat them again on Saturday? I say same line up as the line up that was in NY.

Posted by: DCUnitedFootball | April 30, 2009 9:18 PM | Report abuse

I worked at the newspaper here in Lexington, KY for more than 5 years are tried very hard to have them increase coverage in the local minor league teams. The sports editor wasn't interested, said fans only wanted UK hoops and football coverage. I'd see whole pages devoted to high school sports, but the US MNT wouldn't get a mention for a WCQ game (no preview, maybe a line in the results with no report...or a line or two).

The justification was always that they played to the market and what the market wanted. I tried to appeal to the fact that they were obligated to try and educate people on new sports (soccer), to support community teams (minor leagues) as a community paper but, alas, they weren't a group of trailblazers. Unfortunately, the minor league hockey team folded in one year; the baseball team continues to get poor coverage was wavered with folding for it's entire existence and soccer still gets practically no coverage, despite decent local (UK and UofL) programs, and potentiakl storylines.

I'm not saying the Post isn't right - there are only limited resources, especially today. I know that better than most...I've watched 40% of my former colleagues laid off in the pastyear, but at the same time, diversifying into an area that lacks coverage is a way to gain back readership. More over, I just think it's the newspapers' responsibility to let people know what's out there. Maybe I'm be idealistic, but that's how I feel.

Now, that's not to say I agre with hoffbrauhaus, but I know where he's coming from...and I've seen the damage that a lack of newspaper coverage/support can do to a team in a market. It's the same argument we've had about ESPN for years - if ESPN REALLY got behind soccer it would probably take off, but they dont and it doesn't....and they justify it by saying the market itsn't there yet, when really media holds the key and they're keeping the door locked.

Not a dig at you Goff - your blog is great and covers all the bases - just a general rant.

Posted by: Aljarov | May 1, 2009 8:19 AM | Report abuse

shameless self-promotion/public interest: Boston Pro Soccer Examiner covers the Breakers, NY Soccer Examiner Jeff Kassouf provides great coverage of Sky Blue, and SoccerLens in England covers WPS bi-weekly, including an exclusive interview with Hope Solo posted yesterday.

Posted by: eisenmenger | May 1, 2009 9:38 AM | Report abuse

@eisenmenger: Thank you, Jeff's mom.

Posted by: I-270Exit1 | May 1, 2009 9:59 AM | Report abuse

Why do we need away game coverage of Freedom matches anyway? Aren't the players twittering?

Posted by: I-270Exit1 | April 30, 2009 7:16 PM
__________________________________________

But this does not seem to be reliable. For instance, as I pointed out in an earlier thread, Katie Jo Spisak, the Freedom's designated tweeter, neglected her duties throughout last Sunday's match.

Posted by: universityandpark | May 1, 2009 10:31 AM | Report abuse

The Washington Freedom twitter group actually sends out pretty consistent messages during games and tries to do play by play as much as possible.

Posted by: soccerfan80 | May 1, 2009 12:07 PM | Report abuse

If the POST judges its sports coverage by the number of people interested, then why does it devote such vast resources (frequently resulting in multiple pages in the Sports section) to high school games? I would think that there'd be fewer people interested in the average one of those games as attend Freedom matches. I'd like to see the POST drop all of that and start covering teams like the Baysox again.

Posted by: kevinwparker | May 1, 2009 12:38 PM | Report abuse

kevinwparker,

Parents subscribe to the paper because they want to see their kids' names in print. Editors cater to their customers.

Posted by: eisenmenger | May 1, 2009 12:53 PM | Report abuse

But this does not seem to be reliable. For instance, as I pointed out in an earlier thread, Katie Jo Spisak, the Freedom's designated tweeter, neglected her duties throughout last Sunday's match.

Posted by: universityandpark | May 1, 2009 10:31 AM

----

Do you think that could be because she played 90 minutes in goal?

Posted by: revsfanindc | May 2, 2009 6:06 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company