Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 10:00 AM ET, 03/25/2010

Backchannel chatter: Jane Mayer v. Marc Thiessen

By Jeff Stein

Former Bush speechwriter Marc Thiessen smacked Jane Mayer in his recent book defending the CIA’s “enhanced interrogation techniques,” and now the New Yorker’s national security writer is hitting back.

In “Courting Disaster: How the CIA Kept America Safe and How Barack Obama Is Inviting the Next Attack,” Thiessen said Mayer exaggerated administration infighting over a speech President Bush was to give defending the interrogations, contending there was “no rival draft,” as Mayer wrote, by anti-torture officials. But in the current issue of the New Yorker, Mayer persuasively deconstructs every case that Thiessen marshals to argue that waterboarding and other methods produced useful intelligence. Speaking of which, the long running investigation of the CIA’s tapes destruction appears to be nearing a close, The Post’s Carrie Johnson and Julie Tate reported late Wednesday.

By Jeff Stein  | March 25, 2010; 10:00 AM ET
Categories:  Backchannel chatter  | Tags:  Bush, CIA, Jane Mayer, Marc Thiessen, New Yorker magazine  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Whitehurst’s legacy still haunts the FBI lab
Next: Backchannel chatter: NSA's split personality

Comments

Automatic weapon or grenade, there will be holes. Do you want one big hole or lots of little holes? We all get keyed up in a strange way from time to time. To cap the climax we issued common stock, owned 100% of it and put it into escrow against the mortgages. As we pay off the mortgages, the stock is released. Escrow or not, what is overlooked is that we have complete control of the company. What's your excuse? I was on Company business and business is good. It could always get better. Everybody can turn on you like snakes and then the snakes want U.S. Treasury funds to feed more snakes. I'd get snake skin boots honey and wear them on your feet. This could start getting messy. I'll make improvements later, I promise.

Posted by: tossnokia | March 27, 2010 8:32 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company