Steinberg on Coverage of Terps' Women
Do the enormously successful Maryland women deserve more coverage? Dan Steinberg of the D.C. Sports Bog tackles the issue.
By
Matt Bonesteel
|
March 23, 2009; 3:13 PM ET
Save & Share:
Previous: Do Terps Fans Now Cheer For Memphis?
Next: Camille Powell Previews Women's Second Round
Posted by: OriginalMysticsFan | March 23, 2009 4:56 PM | Report abuse
No, actually it's the readers that are the problem. If they aren't interested in reading about the Terp women, then that will be reflected in how much ink the Post uses on them. If more readers were clicking on more articles about the Terps women, we'd see more coverage. It's really that simple.
Posted by: Barno1 | March 23, 2009 7:00 PM | Report abuse
Tell ya what, the Lady Terps are certainly more interesting then the men Terps for sure. At least the ladies are STILL PLAYING and going for their 2nd NCAA Title in 3 years. The men Terps are still stuck at 2002.
Posted by: memyselfI1 | March 24, 2009 2:21 PM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.
Dan Steinberg admittedly hasn't written a single word about the Maryland women's basketball team all season until now. It's clear from his blog that he really couldn't care less about women's sports, so why should we care what he thinks about how they are covered? He's part of the problem.