Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
On Twitter: TerpsInsider and PostSports  |  Facebook  |  E-mail alerts: Redskins and Sports  |  RSS

Hot topic: Gregory, of course

With the return of junior forward Dino Gregory from suspension roughly 24 hours away, the popular topic of conversation Friday at Comcast Center was, naturally, the impact Gregory's presence will have on the Terrapins.

"A player like Dino, I saw his stats on the cover of the back page of the Diamonback today, you know, players give to the team other things besides statistics," Maryland Coach Gary Williams said. "In other words, when you buy a business there's an item line that's 'good will.' There's a good will that you build up as a business, and that goes into the value of that particular business when it's for sale. And it's the same thing for players.

"Players like Dave Neal, like Dino Gregory, give things to the team that are difficult to put a value on, but they're very important to the team. With Dino, it's effort everyday in practice. It's the same effort that shows in the games. It's a player who wants to get better. Dino's a much better player than when he came here as a freshman. His tenacity down the stretch during the NCAA tournament, the ACC tournament, the game against North Carolina, things like that, certainly were a big factor in our team's success because it's contagious. If you're a good passing team, that becomes contagious. If you have good effort, that becomes contagious. If you have guys that really work hard, and that's what Dino is.

"He fits a lot of those categories that don't necessarily show up on the stat sheet, and to belittle Dino's accomplishments last year is wrong. I think most basketball people with knowledge of basketball would say the same thing."

Williams went on to note that Gregory's return also might positively impact the play of senior guard Greivis Vasquez, who has struggled offensively so far this season.

"I think Greivis has proven that he's a great player," Williams said. "He led us in points, assists and rebounds last year. I think he's the first player in the history of Maryland ever to do that. That's what he can do, and I think if he would just allow that to happen sometimes, it happens.

"Basketball's a funny game. I don't think I ever coached a player who was our best scorer that didn't lead his team in scoring. The ball seems to find those guys. I think Greivis, it'll happen, and he just needs one game to break out, and I'm very confident in Greivis of his ability that that will happen. And this could be another situation where Dino's return will help Greivis, so we'll see how it goes."

Vasquez, who is shooting 32.3 percent from the field and averaging 12.8 points per game, also spoke to the media today. I'll post a lengthy transcript of that chat in a little bit.

By Steve Yanda  |  December 11, 2009; 3:03 PM ET
Categories:  Men's basketball  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Scouting Eastern Kentucky
Next: Vasquez: 'My problem is mental'


I want to be positive, oh so badly. I want to believe the return of another undersized post player (Dave Neil 2.0???) will help improve both the team and GV.

But I'm just not seeing it. I really hope I'm wrong though.

Is this a case of GW over valuing players who practice and try real hard (Neal, Dino, etc) and not those who have the promise to excel in games (Cliff Tucker, if given time to play, and some confidence by not being constantly berated).

So I ask the question - what happens if (when?) Dino doesn't make an immediate impact on the team? People have been banking on Dino for weeks...

Posted by: ckstevenson | December 11, 2009 5:15 PM | Report abuse

I see no comparison between Neal and Gregory, other than their lack of height. Gregory can jump through the roof (somewhat making up for his height) and is generally stronger, more athletic, and a better defender. He's not just an effort guy, he actually has talent. As long as he plays more at 4 than 5 (at least against bigger teams) he can be effective.

People really need to get off Tucker's bandwagon and stop blaming Gary for not playing him. Tucker just has not worked hard enough to be a consistent contributor. He takes too many risks on D (works against some opponents but not others), and is completely lost in the flex offense. The only time he looks comfortable is in a track meet/transition game...which explains his success against UNC. We'll need him next year, but he hasn't earned much PT on this team.

Posted by: Jeremy76 | December 11, 2009 11:51 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company