Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
On Twitter: TerpsInsider and PostSports  |  Facebook  |  E-mail alerts: Redskins and Sports  |  RSS

Should NCAA football teams with losing records play in bowl games?

I don’t root for teams. I root for Marriott points, working computers, relaxed deadlines and NCAA tournament sites in New Orleans or Tempe. I also root every year for something else: More bowl berths than eligible teams. I root for chaos. My thinking: Perhaps that is the only way NCAA and bowl officials realize the absurdity of 70 of 120 division I-A college football teams competing in the postseason.

I was so wrong. I underestimated the officials. Instead of abolishing some of these bowls, they may take a different approach: If there aren’t enough good teams to fill the slots, let’s send the bad ones to the bowl games, right? Maybe. Officials are engaged in ongoing discussions about the possibility of proclaiming teams with losing records eligible for bowl games if there is a dearth of 6-6 teams (as if most 6-6 teams are even deserving).

Look, I understand the athlete participation argument that some coaches may make: More kids get to experience the postseason in their respective sport. College basketball coaches used it as part of their talking points as they beat the drum for tournament expansion over the past year. But, specifically in college football, awarding 5-7 teams with bowl berths smacks of the everyone-gets-a-trophy mentality. These teams don’t deserve the trip, the gift, the game, etc. And who wants to see them play?

There comes a point when the product is watered down. I don’t think growing the NCAA tournament to 68 teams diminishes the product. A 96-team field would have diminished it. In college football, 35 bowl games – some played in half-empty stadiums – already waters down a significantly flawed postseason. The bowl season already so often feels anticlimactic. There may be a thrilling ending or two, but deserving teams often don’t get an opportunity to play for the national title and the cards are stacked against non-BCS teams. The postseason often is a letdown after a scintillating, 14-week-or-so adrenaline rush.

Now you may get the chance to see a 5-7 team in a bowl game? It could happen if this gets approved. Last season 71 teams qualified for bowl games. This season, there are 70 available berths in bowls. Not a big margin for error. And consider this: Upsets have been more prevalent – see James Madison v. Virginia Tech – so teams can’t assume they can get over the six-win hump with one victory over a flyweight I-AA team anymore.

There is a real possibility that there may be a shortage of eligible teams, this year or in the future. I don’t have an issue with a basketball team reaching the tournament with a losing record because that team earns the berth by winning its conference tournament, claiming the automatic entry.

But picture this: Maryland beats Navy, Morgan State, Florida International, Duke and Wake Forest this season. Under that scenario, the Terrapins could perhaps claim just one victory (Navy) against a team that finishes the regular season with a winning record. And they would finish the regular season without a road victory. And you’re going to tell me fans should rejoice and book plane tickets to see their five-win juggernaut play in the gotta-see GMAC Bowl in Mobile, Ala., on Jan. 6 because there are not enough eligible, or deserving teams?

I’ll stay home. Forget the Marriott points.

Here is the link to the story written by Brent Schrotenboer, an excellent reporter from San Diego.

By Eric Prisbell  | September 23, 2010; 9:24 AM ET
Categories:  Football  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Friedgen: Some players were 'star-struck, nervous' against West Virginia
Next: Maryland and Texas, a tale of two football programs

Comments

Why are they even talking about this. It just goes to show how broken the college football postseason is. So where is the line drawn? Is you have a 5-7 Kent State team and a 4-8 Maryland team, which one nets the big to the GMAC Bowl?

It's to the point now where bowls are looking to just sell tickets, then why even bother playing a season. Notre Dame could fill the Jerrydome in December with a winless record. The bowl system is a joke, and the fact that these guys are trying to find ways to keep it alive when enough teams are not eligible means that there's no hope of it ever changing.

Posted by: Russtinator | September 23, 2010 11:37 AM | Report abuse

Seriously, why are we talking about this?

For all the absurd attacks against Ralph Friedgen's countless successes at Maryland, the one claiming that he's only gone to 6 bowl games because there are so many more bowls now has got to be the lamest criticism yet.

Only once has Maryland made a bowl where you could even remotely argue we were borderline undeserving (07 season) and that season we crushed two Top 10 teams--one on the road--and beat another team that had been ranked (Georgia Tech). We weren't a powerhouse but you could certainly have made the argument that we were a pretty good, young team. Especially considering with the bowl game eligibility on the line, we went into North Carolina State and demolished them on the road 37-0 in the regular season finale.

Posted by: Barno1 | September 23, 2010 12:28 PM | Report abuse

I don't really understand the criticism of the bowl games. The BCS, sure, but who cares if there's more bowl games? I love that in the years in which Maryland is at least decent I get to see them play a team they wouldn't normally see at the end of the season. Who's seriously complaining that there's a ton of random teams playing each other in meaningless post season games? What harm does that do to anything?

Posted by: johno189 | September 23, 2010 1:09 PM | Report abuse

TV money is the only reason for the bowl expansion. The schools get the money and the players get the experience and some of the fans will travel wherever the team plays -- none of which is a bad thing.

Nobody cares if the stadium is empty. The GMAC bowl you look down on pulled a 2.4 rating last year with 2.7mil viewers -- more than the average regular season NBA game.

Americans will watch football on TV, especially if a game is the only one in that time slot. It doesn't matter if it's Central Michigan vs. Troy (last years GMAC combatants) -- we want more football!

Posted by: afterp | September 24, 2010 9:07 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company