Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
On Twitter: TerpsInsider and PostSports  |  Facebook  |  E-mail alerts: Redskins and Sports  |  RSS

Thoughts on the Robinson-O'Brien quarterback debate at Maryland

Regardless of Danny O’Brien’s health Saturday, and regardless of who starts at quarterback for Maryland against West Virginia, this much can be said: O’Brien will figure heavily into how the Terrapins fare this season. He impressed fans and media members alike – two groups of individuals who don’t get to watch practice on a daily basis --- by throwing touchdown passes on three of the first four pass attempts of his career against an overmatched division I-AA opponent. That’s impressive, regardless of opponent.

But for Maryland's coaches, they know what O’Brien can do. They’ve seen it in practice this season and last season when he redshirted. James Franklin, the team’s offensive coordinator, has called O’Brien one of the most impressive freshman quarterbacks he has seen because of his poise, preparation and intelligence. And remember, Coach Ralph Friedgen flirted with what seemed like a peculiar notion of burning O’Brien’s redshirt late last season.

Even if they conclude in a few weeks that O’Brien is the best option going forward – and there is no indication that will be the conclusion at this time --- you have to figure current starter Jamarr Robinson will figure into the offense, as well. His running ability adds a dimension to the offense that it has not had the past few years. He missed some opportunities, in Friedgen’s view, against Morgan State. He has also thrown interceptions in each of his first two games this season. With a difficult road game looming, my hunch is that Robinson starts at West Virginia even if O’Brien is healthy. But expect O’Brien to play a significant portion of the game if his right ankle cooperates.

It will be interesting to see how Friedgen and Franklin handle the quarterback rotation the next few weeks, win or lose Saturday. But what they have are two quarterbacks that present different challenges for defenses --- and that is a good problem for a 2-0 Maryland team early in the season. After all, it’s a lot better to debate this than speculate on a head coach’s future, a subject that dominated the chatter during the second-half of last season.

Friedgen is getting ready to speak at his weekly news conference in a few minutes.

How does everyone else feel the quarterback rotation should be handled?

By Eric Prisbell  |  September 14, 2010; 12:40 PM ET
Categories:  Football  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Thoughts on West Virginia football fans in Morgantown
Next: Two quarterbacks expected to play against West Virginia

Comments

Having two quarterbacks with complimentary abilities makes Maryland a much stronger team. Franklin can give the opposing defensive team fits. I would like to see them both get plenty of playing time so they can get accustomed to the switching.

Posted by: billdemps | September 14, 2010 3:07 PM | Report abuse

last year everyone inferred this guy Robinson should have been playing since Turner did not give the team a chance to win. he had a good game against FSU. Now that Robinson is playing, all the focus is on when O'Brien will get his chance.

the question is who gives them the best chance of winning. the focus should be on winning. are either the best in the conference?

Posted by: oknow1 | September 14, 2010 4:09 PM | Report abuse

Is O'Brien simply not good (enough) in practice? It seems like he could have Chris Turner Syndrome (CTS). Turner was third on the depth chart behind Jordan Steffy and even Josh Portis in 2007, but became the starter after playing well in live games. Or maybe O'Brien simply looked good because it was Morgan State. I trust Fridge and the coaches to make the correct decision. They've earned that trust. It's why they make a living coaching and I'm commenting on Blog Posts.

IRIT - In Ralph I Trust

Posted by: fushezzi | September 15, 2010 9:04 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company