Morning links: Maryland stomps Virginia in Charlottesville
Good morning.
Virginia was able to halt Jordan Williams's double-double streak, but that was just about all the Cavaliers were able to do in a 66-42 loss, Maryland's biggest win in Charlottesville since 1930.
Thanks to Adrian Bowie's 22 points and a stifling defense, the Terarpins crushed the Cavaliers.
Maryland stifled Virginia's three-point attack, which is about the only type of attack the injury-riddled, rebuilding Cavaliers have these days.
Said Virginia guard Jontel Evans: "I guess they just wanted it more."
Check out the game stats here.
Over at The 68, Eric Prisbell takes a look at Maryland's NCAA tournament chances after the big win. The gist: The Terrapins are heading in the right direction, but still have a ways to go.
By
Matt Bonesteel
| January 28, 2011; 10:00 AM ET
Categories:
Men's basketball
Save & Share:
Previous: Denying three-pointers proves key to Terps' rout of Virginia
Next: Talkin' Terps: Would missing the NCAA tournament be a disappointment?
The fact that the Dookies feel the need to create a facebook page to express that we are not their rivals says it all...
Posted by: ebitda | January 27, 2011 2:03 PM
_____________________________________________
Reminds me of Ricky Gervais MC last week when he signed off, concluding the evening, his last words were,
"And thank you God, for making me an atheist"
Poor Ricky.
Posted by: RedskinRay1 | January 28, 2011 1:15 PM | Report abuse
The fact that the Dookies feel the need to create a facebook page to express that we are not their rivals says it all...
------------------
No kidding. Just like all the Cowboy fans who flock to Redskins videos on Youtube to say the same thing. Any Skins fans ever go to, oh, I don't know, the Rams' page to say that?
It's called: got your attention, don't we?
Posted by: poorskins | January 28, 2011 1:24 PM | Report abuse
We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.
User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.