In Performance: Elena Ulyanova
Web-only review:

Ulyanova and Smithsonian Disappoint With Rookie Recital
by Robert Battey
I was unaware that the Smithsonian American Art Museum was presenting concerts in its smallish McEvoy Auditorium, but on the basis of Sunday afternoon's recital by pianist Elena Ulyanova, its staff is still learning the ropes.
Although the programs were inexpensive folded sheets, employees didn't print enough and quickly ran short. An out-of-tune E in the piano went unattended during intermission - was there no technician on duty? And when the concert ended, the house lights stayed dark; confused patrons eventually started groping their way to the exits.
(read more after the jump)
Would that the playing made all of this insignificant, but Ulyanova, despite a certain innate facility, gave a rigid, disturbingly unmusical account of mainstream repertoire by Beethoven, Chopin, Debussy, and Rachmaninoff.
From her opening gesture, the shortcomings were legion: a gasping, forced rubato; garbled passagework; unnatural phrasing (every time she executed a leap, however small, there was an accent on the target note); and a shrill, monochromatic sound. I would add "ill-chosen tempos" if I could be sure what any of them were -- transitions never happened without a grinding gear-shift, and syncopations, when discernable, sounded the same as on-beat passages. Yes, she hit most of the notes in the grueling Rachmaninoff Sonata. But even the most histrionic, melodramatic repertoire still requires certain basics of rhetoric and melodic logic, and none reached these ears. This was, quite simply, the widest gap I've ever heard between technique and musical artistry.
-- Robert Battey
By
Anne Midgette
|
August 11, 2009; 6:56 AM ET
| Category:
Add category
,
local reviews
Previous: Funds Dry Up For DC's New Music |
Next: Raise Me Up, Dumb Me Down
Actually, the museum has been running this concert series successfully for a long time now - well over a year. I'm genuinely surprised to read such a poor review (I missed this month) and would suggest to give it another go. For a free series it is really quite superb.
Posted by: 82joc | August 11, 2009 10:51 PM | Report abuse
Oh, give the museum a break! Staff members cannot predict a performer's quirks, nor can a federally-funded museum afford to pay a piano tuner to be on hand throughout an entire concert of keyboard-abusing Rachmaninoff. If you want a pristine performance that is attended to by a staff devoted entirely to musical performance, pay some money and go to the Kennedy Center. I think the Steinway Series is fab! Keep up the great work, SAAM staff!
Posted by: yandymung | August 12, 2009 11:15 AM | Report abuse
The Steinway Series generally is quite good and it may indeed be a bit much to expect SAAM to keep a piano tuner on hand throughout a concert, but your comments about Ms. Ulyanova's interpretations are generally on the mark, especially the final sentence. The concert was perhaps the weirdest one I've ever been to. One sensed a certain intensity in Ms. Ulyanova's approach from the beginning, but it manifested itself in a tendency to play everything quickly, perhaps because she didn't know how else to express that intensity. The first half, with Soler, Beethoven's Appassionata, and Chopin was over in 35 minutes, with Ms. Ulyanova acknowledging the audience's applause and bowing between the pieces. But in the second half (two Debussy pieces, a Rachmaninoff prelude, and Rachmaninoff's Sonata No. 2), she seemed focused on barreling through the music as quickly as she could, not even taking note of the light applause after the Debussy. Not knowing the two Rachmaninoff pieces well, I was not able to tell where the prelude left off and the sonata began. Many in the audience also had the same difficulty hearing the separation between the Debussy and Rachmaninoff pieces. The end result was that 99% of us became confused about what music was being played when and whether the concert was really over when it ended. This was not helped by the fact that Ms. Ulyanova acknowledged the audience's applause briefly when she was finished but then left the stage quickly and did not return. The entire second half of the concert lasted 22 minutes and the concert was over at 4:10 after having started at 3, surely some kind of speed record! I think the reason that the staff was slow to turn up the lights is that they shared the same confusion about whether the concert was really over or not. To sum up, I will give the Steinway Series another chance as I have enjoyed many good concerts it has presented before, but I would venture to say that Ms. Ulyanova needs to establish a more respectful connection with her audience and to learn (as is true of so many young musicians) not to confuse artistic expression with technical brilliance.
Posted by: mp2357 | August 12, 2009 5:07 PM | Report abuse











We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.
User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.