Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
On Twitter: Washpost68 and PostSports  |  Facebook  |  Sports e-mail alerts  |  RSS
Posted at 12:35 PM ET, 02/21/2011

NCAA tournament 2011: Duke reclaims No. 1 seed

By Eric Prisbell

[Note: If you are planning to run an NCAA tournament office pool or a pool among friends, please contact me via e-mail. I'd like to hear from you about your pool. I'm not quoting you or anything; I'm just interested in your thoughts about an idea I have. prisbelle@washpost.com.
Thanks.]

No. 1s
Pittsburgh (Big East)
Duke (ACC)
Ohio State (Big Ten)
Kansas

No. 2s
San Diego State
Brigham Young (MWC)
Texas (Big 12)
Notre Dame

No. 3s
Georgetown
Connecticut
Purdue
Wisconsin

No. 4s
Florida
Louisville
North Carolina
Villanova

No. 5s
Syracuse
Kentucky
Vanderbilt
Arizona (Pac-10)

No. 6s
Missouri
West Virginia
Texas A&M
St. John's

No. 7s
Temple
Cincinnati
George Mason (CAA)
Xavier (Atlantic 10)

No. 8s
Washington
Old Dominion
Illinois
Nevada-Las Vegas

No. 9s
UCLA
Georgia
Tennessee
Utah State (WAC)

No. 10s
Minnesota
Kansas State
Florida State
St. Mary's (WCC)

No. 11s
Marquette
Michigan State
Texas-El Paso (Conference USA)
Boston College

No. 12s

Wichita State (MVC)
Colorado State/Butler
Alabama (SEC)
Richmond/Gonzaga

No. 13s
Oakland (Summit)
Harvard (Ivy)
Belmont (Atlantic Sun)
Cleveland State (Horizon)

No. 14s
College of Charleston (Southern)
Miami (Ohio) (MAC)
Vermont (America East)
Coastal Carolina (Big South)

No. 15s
Bucknell (Patriot)
Montana (Big Sky)
Morehead State (OVC)
Fairfield (Metro Atlantic)

No. 16s
Texas Southern (SWAC)
Hampton (MEAC)
McNeese State (Southland)
LIU (Northeast)
Long Beach State (Big West)
Florida Atlantic (Sun Belt)

By Eric Prisbell  | February 21, 2011; 12:35 PM ET
 
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: NCAA tournament 2011: Butler, Gonzaga among last teams in
Next: NCAA tournament 2011: A look at where the local teams stand

No comments have been posted to this entry.

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company