Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
On Twitter: Washpost68 and PostSports  |  Facebook  |  Sports e-mail alerts  |  RSS
Posted at 9:55 AM ET, 02/11/2011

NCAA tournament 2011: Sizing up the Pac-10

By Eric Prisbell

[Note: If you are planning to run an NCAA tournament office pool or a pool among friends, please contact me via e-mail. I'd like to hear from you about your pool. I'm not quoting you or anything; I'm just interested in your thoughts about an idea I have. prisbelle@washpost.com.
Thanks.]

Pac-10

Conference rank: 7

NCAA tournament bids: 3-4

Locks: Arizona.

Probable: UCLA, Washington

Bubble: Washington State

Most likely to fade: Washington State. Ken Bone's team has performed admirably this season and - much like when Tony Bennett was in Pullman - can defend the heck out of you. Klay Thompson leads the league in scoring. But WSU has lost three of five and is staggering. It is already losing ground.

Sleeper: Washington. It's a little ridiculous to call the clear preseason favorite a sleeper, but that's how I see the Huskies. They snapped their three-game losing skid Thursday by scoring 109 against California. This is one of the most exciting teams in the country. They score almost 85 points a game and make more than nine three-pointers per game. But they give up nearly 70 points a game, and that's on a good day. If they play defense, they can advance in the NCAA tournament.

Player to watch: Derrick Williams. Arizona's sophomore forward is averaging 19.5 points per game and is shooting 63.3 percent, which ranks second nationally.

Most impressive coaching job: Sean Miller. In his second season at Arizona, Miller has the Wildcats poised to have a legit chance to win the Pac-10 title.

Biggest disappointment: Washington. Before the season, the Huskies were considered the main reason to keep an eye on the Pac-10. They have regressed and, at the moment, are looking at an unflattering seed in the NCAA tournament.

Most compelling story line: Can a Pac-10 team reach the Sweet 16? My guess is yes. Last season, critics treated the league like a punching bag all year and its two NCAA tournament teams, California and Washington, both won NCAA tourney games (Washington reached the Sweet 16).

By Eric Prisbell  | February 11, 2011; 9:55 AM ET
 
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: NCAA tournament 2011: Sizing up the SEC
Next: Bracketology: Eric Prisbell's NCAA tournament field of 68

No comments have been posted to this entry.

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company