NCAA tournament 2011: Updated 68-team tournament field
Here is my updated 68-team tournament field, as of Wednesday morning:
No. 1s
Ohio State (BIG TEN)
Kansas (BIG 12)
Pittsburgh (BIG EAST)
Notre Dame
No. 2s
Duke
San Diego State
Syracuse
Florida (SEC)
No. 3s
BYU (MWC)
Purdue
North Carolina (ACC)
Texas
No. 4s
Wisconsin
Louisville
St. John's
West Virginia
No. 5s
Connecticut
Georgetown
Kentucky
Vanderbilt
No. 6s
Kansas State
Arizona (PAC-10)
Cincinnati
Xavier (A-10)
No. 7s
Texas A&M
UNLV
Temple
UCLA
No. 8s
George Mason
Missouri
Old Dominion (CAA)
Utah State (WAC)
No. 9s
Illinois
Florida State
Washington
Marquette
No. 10s
Villanova
Georgia
Gonzaga (WCC)
Tennessee
No. 11s
Richmond
St. Mary's
Virginia Tech
Michigan State
Colorado
Michigan
No. 12s
Boston College
UAB (CONFERENCE USA)
Butler (HORIZON)
Clemson
No. 13s
Oakland (SUMMIT)
Harvard (IVY)
Belmont (ATLANTIC SUN)
Indiana State (MVC)
No. 14s
Wofford (SOUTHERN)
Kent State (MAC)
Bucknell (PATRIOT)
Morehead State (OVC)
No. 15s
Long Beach State (BIG WEST)
LIU (NORTHEAST)
St. Peter's (MAAC)
Northern Colorado (BIG SKY)
No. 16s
UNC-Asheville (BIG SOUTH)
McNeese State (SOUTHLAND)
Arkansas-Little Rock (SUN BELT)
Texas Southern (SWAC)
Boston University (AMERICA EAST)
Bethune Cookman (MEAC)
By
Eric Prisbell
| March 9, 2011; 10:00 AM ET
Save & Share:
Previous: NCAA tournament 2011: Big test looms for depleted Georgetown
Next: NCAA tournament 2011: Colorado becomes last team in field
Nova is a joke & should be a #12 play-in.
Posted by: StikeDC1 | March 9, 2011 11:28 AM | Report abuse
Why do the last four in get placed as 11 seeds when there are two other At Large teams on the 12 seed line? I agree about the last four in being the teams that play but it seems to me if they are the last four in they should not be ahead of any other at large teams.
Posted by: RichHowell | March 9, 2011 12:33 PM | Report abuse
We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.
User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.