Assessing the Political Impact of Bristol Palin's Pregnancy

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's family at a rally in Dayton, Ohio, gust 29, 2008. Sarah Palin's daughter, Bristol, is holding four-month-old Trig Palin. (Melina Mara / The Washington Post)
ST. PAUL -- Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin announced moments ago that her 17-year-old daughter, Bristol, is five months pregnant and is planning to keep the baby and marry the father.
"We have been blessed with five wonderful children who we love with all our heart and mean everything to us," said Sarah and Todd Palin in a statement. "Our beautiful daughter Bristol came to us with news that as parents we knew would make her grow up faster than we had ever planned. We're proud of Bristol's decision to have her baby and even prouder to become grandparents. As Bristol faces the responsibilities of adulthood, she knows she has our unconditional love and support."
The news comes just 72 hours after Palin was introduced by John McCain as his vice presidential nominee. In the time between the pick and Palin's statement today, rumors had grown louder and louder that Palin's youngest son, Trig, was actually her grandson and that it was Bristol who had given birth to the young boy.
According to Reuters, McCain campaign officials knew about Bristol's pregnancy during the vetting process and that the rumors surrounding baby Trig's birth made an announcement necessary.
Reuters' Steve Holland writes: "McCain officials said the news of the daughter's pregnancy was being released to rebut what one aide called 'mud-slinging and lies' circulating on liberal blog sites."
The impact of such a bombshell announcement is hard to gauge so soon after it has been made public. Assessing the way it could influence the race is also complicated by the ongoing wall-to-wall coverage of Hurricane Gustav -- the cable networks have stuck with the coverage of the natural disaster so far, just adding a line in the news crawl about the Palin revelation.
Conservative blogs appear to be rallying to Palin's side in the matter. Townhall.com, a prominent conservative website, has already expressed support for the Palins in a blog post.
Writes Carol Platt Liebau:
"I admire all the Palins' willingness to be forthright about the pregnancy, their pro-life convictions even when they entail personal pain or embarrassment, and their understanding that babies need and deserve to have a father and a mother who are committed to each other in marriage."
That quick support will be key to shaping how the issue is treated since, for social conservatives, a teenage pregnancy is something of a jump ball.
On the one hand, premarital sex is frowned upon. On the other, the Palins' commitment to keep the baby and Bristol Palin's pledge to marry the father of the child gives social conservatives something to latch on to if they are looking for positives out of this situation.
A few other factors to remember when trying to figure out how this will play out.
#8226; Palin has a VERY strong following among social conservatives who are nearly certain to give her the benefit of the doubt in this situation. She is a known commodity in social conservative circles and is regarded as "one of them" -- a fact that should lessen any criticism from the right.
#8226; Democrats must be VERY careful not to take a false step here. Some Republicans have already insisted that the Obama campaign is behind the rumor-mongering about Sarah, Bristol and Trig -- although in our experience the campaign has not pushed the story AT ALL, in fact they have been encouraging reporters to focus on the issues of difference between the two candidates rather than personal stories. Any sense that Democrats are pushing this idea will almost certainly turn both Sarah and Bristol Palin into sympathetic figures -- and that spells trouble for her detractors.
By
Chris Cillizza
|
September 1, 2008; 1:11 PM ET
Categories:
Eye on 2008
Save & Share:
Previous: Jindal's Moment
Next: The Fix: Live From St. Paul
Posted by: Anonymous | September 6, 2008 5:06 PM | Report abuse
Who cares what the Anchorage Daily News or any of the McClatchy newpapers say?? Check their stock report:
Quote: "Crippling debt, unimaginative management."
They, like Hillary, can't even manage their own money, let alone run a newspaper.
Posted by: Willy | September 6, 2008 4:24 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "word bubbled up that the National Enquirer alleged in its print edition that John McCain's running mate had an affair with a business partner to her husband."
Hilarious. If you believe anything in the National Enquirer or even read it, you libs are more stupid that I thought.
BTW, Nancy Pelosi also has 5 kids. Do I hear any word on how a woman can't take care of 5 kids and be in the government??
Nope, Double standard again. Go home and take care of your kids Pelosi.
Posted by: Willy | September 6, 2008 4:03 PM | Report abuse
MORE LIES FROM SARAH PALIN...
"I believe I was fired because of, primarily the reason of her former brother-in-law," Monegan said. "I think that my unwillingness to take special action against her former brother-in-law was not well received."
Monegan says he believes that the Governor has not told the truth about what happened.
word bubbled up that the National Enquirer alleged in its print edition that John McCain's running mate had an affair with a business partner to her husband.
Yet in a first unsettling revelation – which the McCain camp will hope does not become a pattern – the Anchorage Daily News reported yesterday that when she ran for governor Mrs Palin campaigned on a “build the bridge” platform. The newspaper, in a reference to John Kerry’s alleged “flip-flopping” in the 2004 presidential campaign, said: “Palin was for the Bridge before she was against it.”
Posted by: McCAIN = BUSH | September 6, 2008 1:46 PM | Report abuse
It wouldnt change my opionion though, I think Sarah Palin Should be the GOP nominee!! not McCain. The Republicans are much more excited about palin then mccain., The new most famous person in the world.
This site has the inside scoop about the Palin Dui Secret, http://www.duihelpguide.com Why hasnt the news covered this?
This site has background info on sarah Palin Bio, Pics, Videos, Alot of Polls like how many people actually think that she is attractive? http://www.theveep.com
This site has everything about her scandals, Levi the Boy Friend, what really happen with ebay plane. http://www.hotpres.com
Despite all of this, and her lack of experiance she would probably make a much better president then McCain., Because like Obama she hasnt been corrupted by washington yet.
Posted by: pastor123 | September 6, 2008 11:48 AM | Report abuse
For those of you crowing about Bristol's situation conflicting with Gov. Palin's position on abstinence-only sex ed, you should really check your facts. Gov. Palin has NEVER supported abstinence-only sex ed. She stated in one interview that she would not give funding to promote only explicit sex ed. This is not the same thing.
On a personal note, I'd like to say how classy it is for everyone to be using a 17 yr old girl as a political football. So much for the socially compassionate left.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 6, 2008 4:25 AM | Report abuse
Is Sarah Palin’s daughter’s pregnancy relevant to the presidential campaign?
Absolutely – it points to the glaring problem with her position of supporting abstinence only sex education. Perhaps Sarah and the religious right think that the young moral “offenders” (their value judgment, not mine) can “make it right” by getting married and living with the consequences. These particular “offenders” are the lucky ones, fortunate to have a family support system robust enough to make that a viable option.
What if the consequences had been an HIV infection instead of an ill timed pregnancy?
It is not good public health policy to withhold information from our youth that can make them safer and reduce unwanted pregnancies. That Sarah Palin wholehearted adopts this approach in her personal life as a result of her religious beliefs is commendable. When she advocates public policy decisions based on extremist interpretations of religious beliefs it becomes an important factor in evaluating her candidacy.
Discussing this issue in relation to Sarah Palin’s own family is relevant.
Sarah Palin is the real deal; she has a rigorous moral sense and lives by it. If even she can not make it work in her own family it is just not going to work for families who don’t have her commitment and resources. We need to teach sex education, both why abstinence is a good choice and safe practices to protect our youth who choose otherwise.
Electing Sarah Palin as our next vice president would put her in a position to advance these beliefs and could put a generation of children at greater risk of HIV and unwanted pregnancies.
Posted by: John Kokajko | September 6, 2008 12:30 AM | Report abuse
Quote: "To somehow get from Juneau to Wasilla 810 miles away(driving) to see her Dr., a family Dr, to deliver a baby for 44 yr old woman, that she had to know was a Downs? wowser!"
You assume wrong. You cannot drive to Juneau Alaska. There are no highways.
Read up before you "assume"> You might learn something.
Posted by: Bill | September 5, 2008 11:19 PM | Report abuse
consider this: Sarah has her doctor, the doctor is in Wasilla, AK, which is 810 miles away from Junuea, where she lives in the Governors Mansion. Somehow, during her preg from Sept to delivery in April, she has time to take a bumpy flight, i would assume about 200 mph, or 3 hrs away. That was her "plan" for delivery. To somehow get from Juneau to Wasilla 810 miles away(driving) to see her Dr., a family Dr, to deliver a baby for 44 yr old woman, that she had to know was a Downs? wowser!
http://www.newsminer.com/news/2008/apr/22/palins-flight-labor-falls-under-scrutiny/
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/8/31/51717/5534/739/580979
Posted by: glenncz | September 5, 2008 10:41 PM | Report abuse
I am voting for Obama president and palin as vice. The other two have served well and it's time for them to retire.
Posted by: Zoey | September 5, 2008 2:35 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "The Palin Bounce: Obama lead cut in half, new poll shows:
Sarah Palin's initial impact on the presidential race appears to have been to cut the Democratic lead in half, according to the first Gallup tracking poll since her speech. The polls typically have a day's lag time.
The latest poll doesn't yet reflect any registered voter reaction to John McCain's acceptance speech Thursday night, but opinion on the race now stands at Obama/Biden 48 percent, McCain/Palin 44 percent. This is down from earlier in the week, when the same poll of registered voters reflected 50 percent Obama and 42 percent McCain."
Posted by: Bill | September 5, 2008 2:20 PM | Report abuse
Really Skeptical. That is old news. The polls have spoken.
You need to get a life, badly.
Posted by: Willy | September 5, 2008 12:16 PM | Report abuse
I've been doing some digging, and every photo of Ms. Sarah Palin circa this supposed 5th pregnancy has been scrubbed off their original news sites. That's suspect.
I assume this means that it would be apparent she was never pregnant with Trig. And this is fine. It's also fine (and good) if Bristol is the birth mother. It is good that she has parents loving and supportive enough to assume full responsibility for this poor, challenged baby.
I ask: why all the lying? Why the covering up? Would it really be so terrible to announce that her young daughter gave birth to little Trig? Perhaps it would be. I'm beginning to suspect there is more to this cover-up than most consider.
I definitely think Sarah Palin did not deliver Trig. I think it is likely that her daughter Bristol gave birth to the baby. I further think that it is highly unusual for a healthy, young girl to deliver a Down's baby. If Bristol was acknowledged as the mother questions of paternity would arise and could become very, very touchy. But I think I know why this is being buried.
Sarah Palin's eldest son, Track, enlisted in the Army 8 months prior to Trig's birth. Hrmm. He'll be risking his life in Iraq. Not a typical course for a high ranking politician's son. Consider the implications. Seems like he needs to get out of the picture, doesn't it?
(Yes, things like this do happen. They just don't typically happen to highly publicized politicos.)
Posted by: Really Skeptical | September 5, 2008 2:57 AM | Report abuse
Hey Willy, I think you need your dick sucked!
Posted by: Bill Clinton | September 4, 2008 10:43 PM | Report abuse
uote: "Show Trig's birth certificate. Photos of Sarah in the hospital bed with the newborn and the delivery doctor. Not two photos of her in a black dress with a black vest where she looks 'big'."
Tom, you are hilarious. Photos, birth cerfificates. Who do you think you are? No one cares about you or your suspicions. No one owes you anything. You are as irrelevant as the Clintons.
Posted by: Willy | September 4, 2008 6:07 PM | Report abuse
Tom, you are hilarious. Birth certificates, etc.?? Who do you think you are?? No one cares about your requests or suspicions. whe doesn't have to prove a thing, especially to idiots.
Posted by: Willy | September 4, 2008 6:04 PM | Report abuse
Idiot with the little willy:
Grampa McCain is sitting on a time bomb; little FAS Trig is Bristols baby, and Mommy Governor tried to cover it up, and now Mommy VP candidate has upped the stakes by saying Bristol is pregnant *now*.
No one but low IQ authority worshiping Republemmings are going to swallow all this 'truth by decree' stuff. "It is Down's syndrome because I say it is. It was my baby because I say it is. Bristol is 5 months pregnant now, so she can't be Trig's Mom, because I say she is."
Show Trig's birth certificate. Photos of Sarah in the hospital bed with the newborn and the delivery doctor. Not two photos of her in a black dress with a black vest where she looks 'big'.
After Nixon and George W., we know Republicans are world class liars. Hold her feet to the fire, she's in the Big Leagues now. Repugs demanded Obama's birth certificate, and tried to sue him to see it :
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html
Let's get a factcheck of little Trig's birth certificate. That's all I ask.
No more *pronouncements* from people that might very well be world class liars.
Posted by: Tom | September 4, 2008 4:51 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "Reaction to Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin's debut speech before the party's convention in St Paul, Minnesota.
MIKE DUFFY, TIME MAGAZINE
Only a few times in the last 25 years have we seen what we saw here tonight. It happened in Chicago in 2004 with Barack Obama and it happened here tonight: a star was born.
NEW YORK TIMES
Sarah Palin, the vice presidential nominee, was a combative and witty relief at a torpid convention. But it was bizarre hearing the running mate of a 26-year veteran of Congress, a woman who was picked to placate the right-wing elite, mocking "the permanent political establishment in Washington."
LYNN SWEET, CHICAGO SUN-TIMES
Palin did not flinch as she sliced, diced and mocked Barack Obama in her debut speech on a major stage.
JED BABBIN, HUMAN EVENTS
Palin's performance was so good, her vice-presidential adversary, Sen Joe Biden, will not be able to bob and weave only in the 2 October [vice-presidential] debate. He may float like a butterfly, but Palin stings like a bee.
EZRA KLEIN, AMERICAN PROSPECT
It was an auspicious debut, the sort of address that would be judged a success if she were a newcomer keynoting the convention. She landed clean punches, temporarily silenced some of her critics, and retold John McCain's story with a keen sense for the drama of his experience. But I expected more.
KATHLEEN PARKER, NATIONAL REVIEW
There's time to hash out the details, but one can't help but be excited by the reception of a woman vice-presidential candidate. Just as we all felt proud when Barack Obama became the first African-American presidential candidate."
.
Posted by: Bill | September 4, 2008 3:06 PM | Report abuse
Still waiting for an intelligent reponse::
All this about a teenaged pregnancy from the people who twice elected the most promiscuous president ever, (Bill Clinton) charged several times, even in his college days a girl couldn't say "no". He was impeached for lying under oath. Wanting to elect a woman for president (Hillary) who is a proven habitual liar, chose a person (Obama) who has no qualifications, who chose a Senator (Biden)as VP, who is known as the "blowhard" of the senate and had to drop out of the presidential race in '88 because of accusations of plagiarism, both in college, and in his speeches.
Idiots in the voting booth!
Posted by: Willy | September 4, 2008 2:59 PM | Report abuse
Another under-educated lib who has to post the same thing three times to try to get her point across.
Explain this:
Quote: "A number of national polls out in the last 48 hours suggest that Barack Obama got a small bounce from his convention, but the media is speculating that the size of that bounce may have been limited by John McCain's VP announcement the morning after the Democratic convention ended. The Politico reports Obama's bounce in the polls "appears to be slightly smaller than the norm of past conventions, and it's gradually depreciating."
Posted by: Bill | September 4, 2008 2:55 PM | Report abuse
The Republicans should be ashamed but NEVER are because they have moral righteousness on their side, remember? PLEASE! I LOVE how not just a baby blanket, but a spread out baby blanket was usud in a futile attempt to hide what Bristol is all about & then when busted ...Sarah proudly displays Trig, Track, Frik & Frak & parades them around as if they are little kings & queens :-)
She is repulsive to many women who are not religous zealots & she looks like a repressed librarian. Can't you just see the whole act...glasses coming off, bun in the hair coming undone & gently tossing her nasty hair, & trying to make more babies AT AGE 44 with her redneck hubby Todd telling her she's his Norma Rae!!! I didn't know Alaska was so full of trash that's living back in time.
Oh, and did you catch the brief glimpses of studd-muffin Levi Johnston? He looked absolutely enthralled to be there! I know he wrote he's not interested in children on his myspace page, but I wouldn't be suprised if he was basically forced to "own up" & do the right thing by Bristol by Sarah & Todd. Yeah, that marriage will endure.
I love how all the commentators on MSNBC & NBC mentioned the Biden grand-children were vetted months ago & what a thorough process it involves. Just goes to show the kind of careful consideration Barack & his team give every decision & how seriously it is taken. John McCain doesn't care about protocal or procedure...he just had an itch for this woman & scratched it so to speak...how gauling & offensive to his party's base but of course they think the Palin pack is swell.
Notice Sarah didn't mention anything other than energy or bashing Barack...no mention of the economy or any issues that affect real families she claims to represent. You won't hear any of this until they prep her to debate Joe & you sure won't hear her far right freakish beliefs as a way to attract undecided women to the republican ticket...even they know she will detract from the general women's vote. Many women repub delegates were not excited for her on the ticket until they heard her deliver a speech she didn't even write!!!
Posted by: Barbara | September 4, 2008 12:13 PM | Report abuse
The Republicans should be ashamed but NEVER are because they have moral righteousness on their side, remember? PLEASE! I LOVE how not just a baby blanket, but a spread out baby blanket was usud in a futile attempt to hide what Bristol is all about & then when busted ...Sarah proudly displays Trig, Track, Frik & Frak & parades them around as if they are little kings & queens :-)
She is repulsive to many women who are not religous zealots & she looks like a repressed librarian. Can't you just see the whole act...glasses coming off, bun in the hair coming undone & gently tossing her nasty hair, & trying to make more babies AT AGE 44 with her redneck hubby Todd telling her she's his Norma Rae!!! I didn't know Alaska was so full of trash that's living back in time.
Oh, and did you catch the brief glimpses of studd-muffin Levi Johnston? He looked absolutely enthralled to be there! I know he wrote he's not interested in children on his myspace page, but I wouldn't be suprised if he was basically forced to "own up" & do the right thing by Bristol by Sarah & Todd. Yeah, that marriage will endure.
I love how all the commentators on MSNBC & NBC mentioned the Biden grand-children were vetted months ago & what a thorough process it involves. Just goes to show the kind of careful consideration Barack & his team give every decision & how seriously it is taken. John McCain doesn't care about protocal or procedure...he just had an itch for this woman & scratched it so to speak...how gauling & offensive to his party's base but of course they think the Palin pack is swell.
Notice Sarah didn't mention anything other than energy or bashing Barack...no mention of the economy or any issues that affect real families she claims to represent. You won't hear any of this until they prep her to debate Joe & you sure won't hear her far right freakish beliefs as a way to attract undecided women to the republican ticket...even they know she will detract from the general women's vote. Many women repub delegates were not excited for her on the ticket until they heard her deliver a speech she didn't even write!!!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 4, 2008 12:09 PM | Report abuse
The Republicans should be ashamed but NEVER are because they have moral righteousness on their side, remember? PLEASE! I LOVE how not just a baby blanket, but a spread out baby blanket was usud in a futile attempt to hide what Bristol is all about & then when busted ...Sarah proudly displays Trig, Track, Frik & Frak & parades them around as if they are little kings & queens :-)
She is repulsive to many women who are not religous zealots & she looks like a sexually repressed librarian. Can't you just see the whole act...glasses coming off, bun in the hair coming undone & gently tossing her nasty hair, & trying to make more babies AT AGE 44 with her redneck hubby Todd telling her she's his Norma Rae!!! I didn't know Alaska was so full of trash that's living back in time.
Oh, and did you catch the brief glimpses of studd-muffin Levi Johnston? He looked absolutely enthralled to be there! I know he wrote he's not interested in children on his myspace page, but I wouldn't be suprised if he was basically forced to "own up" & do the right thing by Bristol by Sarah & Todd. Yeah, that marriage will endure.
I love how all the commentators on MSNBC & NBC mentioned the Biden grand-children were vetted months ago & what a thorough process it involves. Just goes to show the kind of careful consideration Barack & his team give every decision & how seriously it is taken. John McCain doesn't care about protocal or procedure...he just had an itch for this woman & scratched it so to speak...how gaulimg & offensive to his party's base but of course they think the Palin pack is just fine.
Notice Sarah didn't mention anything other than energy or bashing Barack...no mention of the economy or any issues that affect real families she claims to represent. You won't hear any of this until they prep her to debate Joe & you sure won't hear her far right freakish beliefs as a way to attract undecided women to the republican ticket...even they know she will detract from the general women's vote. Many women repub delegates were not excited for her on the ticket until they heard her deliver a speech she didn't even write!!!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 4, 2008 11:56 AM | Report abuse
Quote: "He Willy, you miss the point. Democrats are not against sex. We have no problem with Bill Clinton getting an occasional blow job."
No, Lost Cause, you miss the point. Repubs and Libertarians are not against sex either. But, where do you stand on rape charges. Hmmm. Read Clinton's history. Then comment on the rest of the post. Bill Clinton was only the start of the post. Oh, you can't because it's all true.
Idiots in the voting booth.
Posted by: Willy | September 4, 2008 10:54 AM | Report abuse
Quote: "This little girl had sex with an 18 year old man..."
Hilarious. "this little girl" was of the age of consent in Alaska.
Each state has its own laws. Another under-educated lib. I stand by my statement. Read it again. Double standard. Idiots in the voting booth.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 4, 2008 10:46 AM | Report abuse
We are supposed to believe Bristol is 'about 5 months pregnant' just because the Karl Rove advised campaign *announces* it ? Bristol would look the same if she gave birth April 18, or if she is 4-5 months pregnant now.
I still say Sarah faked the pregnancy from March 6 to April 18 - just 6 weeks of trouble. And Trig has Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, not Down's syndrome - FAS is very common with uninformed teenage mothers; the "Down's Syndrome" announcement was part of the Cover up. Since people would say "oh, 44 year old mother, Down's, how sad..."
Of course it's a shotgun wedding with hockey redneck: he's the father of Trig.
I hear a nurse at Mat-Su Regional Medical Center has agreed to spill the beans in October for a huge sum $$$. Her ticket out of moose country.
Posted by: Tom | September 4, 2008 9:54 AM | Report abuse
In the city Ketchikan, the planned site of the so-called "Bridge to Nowhere," political leaders of both parties said the claim was false and a betrayal of their community, because she had supported the bridge and the earmark for it secured by Alaska's Congressional delegation during her run for governor.
The bridge, a span from the city to Gravina Island, home to only a few dozen people, secured a $223 million earmark in 2005. The pricey designation raised a furor and critics, including McCain, used the bridge as an example of wasteful federal spending on politicians' pet projects.
"People are learning that she pandered to us by saying, I'm for this' ... and then when she found it was politically advantageous for her nationally, abruptly she starts using the very term that she said was insulting," Weinstein said.
Just more of the same...John McSame/Bush
typical, typical....
Posted by: Lost Cause | September 4, 2008 7:20 AM | Report abuse
Yay Sarah! Fantastic speech!
Here is Sarah's anthem:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Od2zY8VpoC4
Posted by: mccainpalinaltheway | September 4, 2008 12:54 AM | Report abuse
"The National Enquirer's coverage of a vicious war within Sarah Palin's extended family includes several newsworthy revelations, including the resulting incredible charge of an affair plus details of family strife when the Governor's daughter revealed her pregnancy. Following our John Edwards' exclusives, our political reporting has obviously proven to be more detail-oriented than the McCain campaign's vetting process. Despite the McCain camp's attempts to control press coverage they find unfavorable, The Enquirer will continue to pursue news on both sides of the political spectrum."
drip, drip, drip....
Posted by: Lost Cause | September 4, 2008 12:50 AM | Report abuse
tootie,
I would like to add one more thing while i am
able to thing about it, I am an old fart like John McCain. Like McCain I served in Viet Nam. My apparent inability to type, spell is not due to my motor skills, you see i lost an arm, and have reduced sight. Most of the misspellings are due to the simple fact that I just can't see....but i don't brag about it like McCain or try to use it to get elected president.
My mental skills are also beginning to go, and I have these "senior moments". Exactly why we don't need Sarah Palin. 17 year old unmarried pregnant daughter or not.
I was not a POW, because as a young man, I had the good sense not to get caught.
But, I am not so old or wasted from war to recognize that John McCain and Sarah Palin are not good for this country.
Posted by: Lost Cause | September 3, 2008 11:07 PM | Report abuse
Got the answer!
All black unwed teenagers should immediately rush and get their families to become Republicans, then they will not be so heavily scorned by the public as in the past and present.
Posted by: zebraindependent | September 3, 2008 10:54 PM | Report abuse
tootie, you are absolutely correct. I should be more careful, do a better job, select better words and phrases. but, i am from the John McCain school of vetting. Making sure we do a good job is not important. No matter the damage to a 17 year old young girl. Throwing "trailer trash" out to Americans, now that is what is important.
I could not have made my argument any better than you made it for me. I am too quick to type, John McCain was too quick to select, I make mistakes, and because of John McCain's poor vetting skill and poor judgment, this country could be stuck with a poorly trained, no experience, unskilled vp.
My mistakes only cause you to criticize me and call me names, John McCain's mistake could get someone killed or worse. You offer nothing to the debate, except calling me names, typical.
Posted by: Lost Cause | September 3, 2008 10:40 PM | Report abuse
He Willy, you miss the point. Democrats are not against sex. We have no problem with Bill Clinton getting an occasional blow job. What we find disturbing and somewhat confusing is the republican hypocrisy. This little girl had sex with an 18 year old man. Republican preach Abstinence, yet their main "squeeze" can't communicate that to her daughter. Guess mom was not around often enough. She is now unmarried, 17 and pregnant. Everything Republicans supposedly stand against. I guess I could understand you folks better if I simply saw less hypocrisy.
Posted by: Lost Cause | September 3, 2008 10:21 PM | Report abuse
All this about a teenaged pregnancy from the people who twice elected the most promiscuous president ever, (Bill Clinton) charged several times, even in his college days a girl couldn't say "no". He was impeached for lying under oath. Wanting to elect a woman for president (Hillary) who is a proven habitual liar, chose a person (Obama) who has no qualifications, who chose a Senator (Biden)as VP, who is known as the "blowhard" of the senate and had to drop out of the presidential race in '88 because of accusations of plagiarism, both in college, and in his speeches.
Idiots in the voting booth!
Posted by: Willy | September 3, 2008 9:43 PM | Report abuse
Hi all! I think we'll be seeing President Barack Obama in January. I'm pro-choice & I don't want to lose my rights.
Posted by: Jean | September 3, 2008 9:17 PM | Report abuse
Abstinence only teaching obviously does not work...not even in the person who is a staunch advocate of such teachings. Sarah Palin is a hypocrite and it is evident after 10 minutes of background checking her history on the wonderful world wide web. She herself has a shot gun wedding in August 1989 and delivered Track Palin in April 1990. She claims to be a HOCKEY mom but Hockey moms spend time with their children and often know if they are smoking, drinking and having sex. This woman preaches traditional values but is an absentee mother from her brood of 5 children. There are pics of Bristol smoking, drinking, and men all over saying they have had sex with her.
The likelihood that Trig is Sarah Palin's child is quite high considering the risk of Down's Syndrome being 1/30 in women over 43 and 1/1250 in Bristol's age range. However..I've had many patients deliver and show up at their 6 week post partum visit PREGNANT AGAIN. So...there is no way to prove that BRISTOL is 5 months vs 3 months. She looks to be less than 20 weeks to me. The only way to resolve such scandal is to:
1) REVEAL TRIGS BIRTH CERTIFICATE
2) HAVE THE OB/GYN WHO DELIVERED TRIG ANNOUNCE THE REAL MOTHER
3) SHOW THE DELIVERY BILL...WHOEVER WAS ADMITTED THAT NIGHT TO THE HOSPITAL IS A PART OF HOSPITAL RECORDS AND A BILL WAS GENERATED TO THE REAL MOTHER.
This is a really sad day in America. More sex, lies and scandals. I'm truly disgusted!
Posted by: Doctor of Women's Health | September 3, 2008 9:14 PM | Report abuse
Listen, it's HOT that Todd--what a stud!!--fathered both Trig by Bristol and now has his second on the way with his own daughter. Go dude!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: jrysk | September 3, 2008 8:24 PM | Report abuse
Hey Lost Cause:
After reading back through some of your comments and then the responses you've logged to others comments, you come off as an atrocious speller and a real smartass. What kind of a sentence is "AT guest at Sarah Palin's church." That is ignorant and makes no sense. Then you refer to John McCain as a "solider." Just what is a solider? A few days ago, a doodoodum named Michael Blaine kept posting idiotic rantings with very similar misspellings like yours. If you can't spell or type clearly, maybe you'd better cancel your daily dates with Rosy Fist.
Posted by: tootie | September 3, 2008 7:51 PM | Report abuse
Hey Ginger Davis.
You make my argument for me. The comment I posted was made by a visitor at Sarah Palin's Church. And you are absolutely correct!
Does that clear up anything for you?
Posted by: Lost Cause | September 3, 2008 6:54 PM | Report abuse
..I simply can't accept that the women of America will acknowledge the bone that Mr. McSame threw them.
I have a stump in my front yard, and that stump is better prepared to lead this country than Sarah Palin!
John McSame is putting the welfare, security and safety of the good 'ole USA in jeopardy with this choice.
John McCain as a solider swore to protect this country and with this decision and choice he is letting the country down. And any one that tags along, is equally guilty!
Hitler destroyed Germany, but the German people were guilty by association because they did not step up and be heard!
She is an incompetent boob. That is the media's fault? She has no experience. That is the media's fault? She is a pusher of abstinence and her unmarried 17 year daughter is pregnant and that is the media's fault. Give me a break! She is one scary woman! to put her daughter's welfare in jeopardy for her own personal ambition. Now that is disgusting!
Posted by: Lost Cause | September 3, 2008 6:46 PM | Report abuse
Being an 18 year old, I was shocked to hear that Bristol is pregnant. Do they not have condoms or birth control pills in Alaska? This family has enough children, and having a baby at 17 is certainly not something to be "proud" of, as Palin said she was. Getting married at 17 is even stupider than getting pregnant at 17. Bristol just ruined her life, and no one is picking on her by telling the facts. If Palin cannot even run her own family, how can she run the country?
Posted by: nic | September 3, 2008 2:09 PM | Report abuse
The fact that Bristol is now 5 months pregnant belies the lie that she is Trig's real mother. Trig was born on April 18, 2008.
Palin could have said the daughter's baby was fathered by John Edwards. The media, who covered up Edwards adultery and love child for 2 plus years would have immediately dropped the subject. You notice that Democrats did not press for a DNA test in the Edwards case.
Most of the media is ignoring (while continuing the rumor), the vileness of the original post on Daily Kos. The original post said the 'father' was the son, scheduled to go to Iraq on Sept. 11. Even the media can't stomach such a vile assertion. We'll see who began this rumor - eventually it will come out, as many are investigating it now.
Michael Moore and two high Democrats said that Gustave was God's judgement that Democrats would win. Sound familiar?
Palin, as Governor, has a budget roughly 10 times Obama's campaign budget, and has a number of employees approximately six times the number of his campaign workers. Obama should do a little research before claiming his remarks.
Posted by: lorry1 | September 3, 2008 10:20 AM | Report abuse
"At guest at Sarah Palin's church."
Posted by: Lost Cause | September 2, 2008 11:20 PM
Just what the hell does this mean? You, anti-semitic f***wad!
Posted by: Ginger Davis | September 2, 2008 11:27 PM | Report abuse
Hey, it is so EXCITING to be in the company of SO MANY pure, moral male and female virgins! I musta died and gone to heaven with all of the precious "saints" who have commented on here!
Posted by: Pinky Tharp | September 2, 2008 11:21 PM | Report abuse
And it was at that Bible Church where a recent guest described a Palestinian attack on Israeli citizens as part of God's judgment coming to pass on Earth -- an analysis likely troubling both to Jews, as well as to mainstream foreign policy analysts.
Describing a trip by his son to Jerusalem, Jews for Jesus founder David Brickner described the a July Palestinian bulldozer attack against Israeli civilians as part of God's "judgment."
At guest at Sarah Palin's church.
Posted by: Lost Cause | September 2, 2008 11:20 PM | Report abuse
met the 50 percent threshold for the first time Tuesday in the Gallup daily tracking poll, a symbolic hurdle that until now had eluded the Democratic nominee.
The Gallup daily tracking poll has found that since the conclusion of the Democratic convention, Obama has risen 5 percentage points in the polls and now leads John McCain 50 percent to 42 percent. That represents a positive turn for Obama, after a couple of days in which he appeared to have peaked at the 49 percent mark while McCain was showing slight improvements.
Hey 8 generation-Your great great granddaddy fight for the Confederacy? You being from Memphis and all?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 11:02 PM | Report abuse
Obama met the 50 percent threshold for the first time Tuesday in the Gallup daily tracking poll, a symbolic hurdle that until now had eluded the Democratic nominee.
The Gallup daily tracking poll has found that since the conclusion of the Democratic convention, Obama has risen 5 percentage points in the polls and now leads John McCain 50 percent to 42 percent. That represents a positive turn for Obama, after a couple of days in which he appeared to have peaked at the 49 percent mark while McCain was showing slight improvements.
Posted by: Lost Cause | September 2, 2008 10:57 PM | Report abuse
We come from a family of patriots and veterans going back to our nation's beginning. We're proud of that and that we are DAR and SAR. We support John McCain and Sarah Palin. Michael, Elizabeth, David, James, Karen, and Susan Benton,
Memphis, TN
Posted by: 8th generation military family | September 2, 2008 10:40 PM | Report abuse
Hey, it is so EXCITING to be in the company of SO MANY pure, moral male and female virgins! I musta died and gone to heaven with all of the precious "saints" who have commented on here!
Posted by: Pinky Tharp | September 2, 2008 10:28 PM | Report abuse
Glad the devil is running because I'm a Wiccan.
Posted by: glindagoodwitch | September 2, 2008 10:22 PM | Report abuse
Let's drain that Demo cesspool in DC!!!!
Send Roberta McCain there to whack 'em with her shoe!!!!
Posted by: Vicki in Vancouver | September 2, 2008 10:17 PM | Report abuse
If the Devil himself ran for president as a Republican, he would still get the Christian vote. They would not be able to recognize him. These Christians are more Republican than Christian.
Wait a minute, the devil is running as a Republican.
Posted by: Lost Cause | September 2, 2008 10:16 PM | Report abuse
Those rumors about Bristol being Trig's mom would disappear really quickly if Sarah's OB/GYN spoke up and verified Sarah's story. It's just that simple, folks. The doctor wouldn't have to to give too many details--a simple confirmation would do.
The longer the Palins let this story run, the more damage it will do--and the Democrats won't have to say a word to keep it going. If Bristol is Trig's mom and pregnant again...what the hell is going on in that family?!? As it is, I don't think a mother of four or five kids, including a newborn Down's Syndrome child, is going to have enough time to be VP.
This was clearly a token pick. McCain thought he could have Lieberman or Ridge and didn't come up with a plan C. Yet another reason to not vote for McCain.
Posted by: Max | September 2, 2008 10:14 PM | Report abuse
Hey, it is so EXCITING to be in the company of SO MANY pure, moral male and female virgins! I musta died and gone to heaven with all of the precious "saints" who have commented on here!
Posted by: Pinky Tharp | September 2, 2008 9:56 PM | Report abuse
Hey, it is so EXCITING to be in the company of SO MANY pure, moral male and female virgins! I musta died and gone to heaven with all of the precious "saints" who have commented on here!
Posted by: Pinky Tharp | September 2, 2008 9:47 PM | Report abuse
Sorry folks! We're still Indys and McCain gets the vote. Texans for McCain.
Posted by: JanandDeaninBigD | September 2, 2008 9:42 PM | Report abuse
Still voting for McCain/Palin.
Posted by: Kansas City Chief | September 2, 2008 9:38 PM | Report abuse
How do we know Bristol is pregant? Oh!... because the same people who were covering everything up in the rumor are vouchsafing that she is. And they MUST be believed even by those who were so sure Sarah was not Trig's mother. Why? Because doubting them twice would be DOUBLE-JEOPARDY, which is senseless and illegal. In any case, if Bristol SHOULD (wonders never cease with this family!) have an alleged miscarriage of her alleged pregancy, then that would be after the election, and that would be water over the dam. So, however you look at it, the case is solved. (Look up double-jeopardy in any law book, if you don't believe me.)
Posted by: frank burns | September 2, 2008 9:34 PM | Report abuse
It was completely unnecessary for the McCain/Palin campaign to reveal Bristol's current pregnancy. A simple, direct approach to the Bristol-is-Trig's-mom rumor would be: "Here's Todd's DNA, here's Sarah's DNA, here's Trig's DNA, it's a match, you people are disgusting."
But they didn't do that -- which means that the rumor almost surely is true. Now, Bristol may in fact be pregnant (again?), but that is irrelevant to the issue of whether the Palins lied about Trig's parentage. In fact, it's really sad that they used her (and Levi) to try to rehabilitate some fatally flawed decisions. And Ms. Palin's poor choices in this sordid drama directly reflect on her judgement, a quality we all agree is vital in a potential Commander-in-Chief.
Posted by: Scott M. | September 2, 2008 9:20 PM | Report abuse
Hey, it is so EXCITING to be in the company of SO MANY pure, moral male and female virgins! I musta died and gone to heaven with all of the precious "saints" who have commented on here!
Posted by: Pinky Tharp | September 2, 2008 9:05 PM | Report abuse
what a joke. the republicans are bashing Obama for not having experience then McSame turns around and taps Palin (who?) to be his veep while her oldest child is knocked up! lmao. Go Obama-Biden!!!
Posted by: 8 years is enuf | September 2, 2008 9:03 PM | Report abuse
Okay Republicans, now if this would have happened to Obama's daughter the entire Republican party would be bashing him and his family, with no sympathy whatsoever. Instead they would have been saying that he would have been unfit to run the country since he couldn't monitor what went on in his own family. But because it's the Republicans nominee whos daughter is pregnant, it's suddenly become okay to have children when you're still a child yourself. Being she is a strong opponent to sex education, than would she not have been even more in touch with her children. What does this say about McCain's judgment in all of this.
Posted by: Kate | September 2, 2008 8:46 PM | Report abuse
In Alaska, age of consent is 16. You would think this would mandate an ever greater parent presence in the life of the child.
Posted by: Lost Cause | September 2, 2008 8:32 PM | Report abuse
WOW...
Why isn't anyone pointing out that she was a leader in an independent party that was trying to get Alaska to secede from the Union?
When Mrs. Obama said she was proud of her country for the first time, the republicans jumped all over that questioning her loyalty as an amercian. Seeeet this gal is trying to divide the United States and no one says a word, just focus on the kid...believe me there is a lot more to focus on that is far more damaging and everyone is ignoring the more important things.
Screw her daughter...oops someone already took care of that.
Posted by: basementfrog | September 2, 2008 8:31 PM | Report abuse
Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you devour widows’ houses, and for a pretense, make long prayers. Therefore you will receive greater condemnation.
“Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you travel land and sea to win one proselyte, and when he is won, you make him twice as much a son of hell as yourselves.”
— Jesus Christ, Matthew 23: 14-15
Hypocrisy of the greatest magnitude.
a word to all you so called democrats voting for McSame...if your conscience will let you, good for you.
Posted by: Lost Cause | September 2, 2008 8:26 PM | Report abuse
"McSane" : You are an ignoramus. We have no proof that a Downs Syndrome test was done. We have no record of Trig's birth, from any hospital, and we don't know whether it is Sarah's child or Bristol's! 80% of Downs syndrome babies are born to women under age 35! And "McSane", you have no right to badmouth Obama in regard to this scandal, because he was the first to say "It is a private matter, and especially off-limits in the case of children." Obama shows great generosity of spirit, wisdom, the absence of spite and very good judgement. Right now his opponent is flat on his back, and Obama could "run him through" easily. But I expect you'll see the light, if you're not a total ignoramus, when the debates come around. Obama will trounce McInsane soundly. And Biden will rip Palin to ribbons. Superior experience, paired with an even temper (which McInsane clearly lacks) will win this election for the Democrats.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 8:15 PM | Report abuse
I wonder how long Bristol has been having sex, since she about 12 or 13? There must have been signs? and mom and dad did not notice? Well, guess mom was not home enough to notice!
REPUBLICAN PLATFORM:
"We renew our call for replacing 'family planning' programs for teens with increased funding for abstinence education, which teaches abstinence until marriage as the responsible and expected standard of behavior," the platform says.
"Abstinence from sexual activity is the only protection that is 100% effective against out-of-wedlock pregnancies..."
so much for this plank!
Posted by: Lost Cause | September 2, 2008 8:13 PM | Report abuse
What we are seeing is a Dysfunctional family playing out its dysfunction in front of millions of Americans.
Well, at least Palin did not hire a hit man to take of her brother in law.
Posted by: Lost Cause | September 2, 2008 8:06 PM | Report abuse
This is so typical of the Republican Party. Why not talk about the issues? What concerns me most is the conservative media and social groups want us to ignore the facts. Why do the republicans keep saying she qualified? I admire her ability to multitask; I'm in grad school, maintaining a 4.0, with a 7, and 3 years old. I'm also a wife and work. Give me round of applause as well as Gov. Palin, but that certainly doesn't mean I'll be supporting her or John McCain, nor does it qualify me or Gov. Palin for vice presidency. Do as I say--not as I do, that's the creed of the Republican Party. Okay, she's keeping the baby, that's great; she made a choice, a choice that the Republican Party seeks to make for every woman (whether or not they don't want to keep the child). No one has the right to tell me or any other woman what to do with our body. Despite what Gov. Palin saids, she originally voted for the "bridge to nowhere." Come on. Alaska does not share the same struggles as the inner city of Chicago, New York or any other place. From what we understand, she is doing well in Alaska; she should continue to do so. This is reckless! The mantra of John McCain, "He is not experienced." Well, maybe he should have not focused so much on Barack and more on himself and his party who will see the light. Of course the Republicans will try to spin this like the media are being so critical because she is a woman, when in fact it is because she lacks the “credible” sound experience that she needs to be an efficient vice president. We want someone ready on day one, not someone who doesn’t even know herself what the vice president does or needs on the job training. Wow! Not this time America, please, not this time.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 7:51 PM | Report abuse
So are the Republicans now saying that it's okay to have a baby while still being a child yourself all because their VP nominee says it's okay? What message are we sending to our young ones. Is it true that Palin herself is a strong opponent of sex education in the schools. I wouldn't be surprise if because of the Republicans acceptance of this that there will now be a lot of illegitimate teen pregnancies. Hey, if it's okay for Palin's daughter to do it, than it's okay for me to do it too. Perhaps in the process of being empowered with all that has gone on in Palin's life in the last two years, her family has had to take a back seat to her ambitions.
Posted by: Kat P | September 2, 2008 7:40 PM | Report abuse
Has anyone looked into when Bristol turned seventeen? She is five months pregnant, did she get pregnant at sixteen? The beau is supposedly eighteen... Would seem like some interesting research....
Posted by: David | September 2, 2008 7:00 PM | Report abuse
Normally such a family issue would be irrelevant politically. However, Gov. Palin has opposed contraception and banned comprehensive sex education. Her push of destructive abstinence-only ideology has destroyed countless lives by causing many teen pregnancies, including that of her daughter. This does prove that Palin is unfit for leadership and generally irresponsible and incompetent.
Posted by: Dean | September 2, 2008 6:43 PM | Report abuse
I find it disgusting that liberals are pouncing on the pregnancy of Gov. Palin's daughter and the fact that the governor has had five children in an attempt to torpedo her candidacy. If a conservative male were to question whether a liberal female with five children should serve, his testicles would be crushed between two rocks. People, his are the important facts to know:
1. Sarah Palin has been a state governor for two years and thus has far more executive experience than either member of the Democratic ticket.
2. Gov. Palin has fought corruption within her own state party and has appointed Republicans, Democrats and independents to her administration. Obama/Biden can't say the same.
3. Ms. Palin has defended the victims of the Exxon Valdez spill and has stood up to Big Oil. She has fought for a natural gas pipeline to bring clean, domestic energy to the lower 48 states.
Another Democrat for McCain/Palin.
Posted by: Graniteman | September 2, 2008 6:21 PM | Report abuse
Levi, Bristol, Sarah, Tod, Trig, baby-Bristol:
Dates, times, places, DNA tests.
Posted by: Kennybruce | September 2, 2008 6:18 PM | Report abuse
I agree with someone who posted that if this was Obama's teenage daughter....the news would be all over it questioning his ability to lead our country!! The fact is...Sarah Palin is absolutely unqualified to lead our country, John McCain is about to keel over at 72 years old and our country is in a state of turmoil because of the Republican Prez that has been in power for the last 8 years!! HELLO PEOPLE...WE NEED A CHANGE AND THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY NEEDS TO TAKE OFFICE ASAP! OBAMA/BIDEN 2008!
Posted by: the truth hurts | September 2, 2008 4:43 PM | Report abuse
The Christian social conservatives politicized the personal long ago! Among other things, Palin wants to change policies and laws that affect our personal choices and behaviors.
The tragedy about the Sarah Palins in our society and government isn't that "We can't control what our children do," it's that they absolutely want to control what my children do.
The lesson that free-thinking humans should take from the Palin morality play is this: It is always the worst offenders who despise us for their failings and mistakes.
Posted by: Sonia Kermaz | September 2, 2008 4:29 PM | Report abuse
It doesn't matter anyway...she's not qualified.
Posted by: letgetrealpeople | September 2, 2008 4:29 PM | Report abuse
Doesn't matter about her daughter...she's still not qualified!
Posted by: letgetrealpeople | September 2, 2008 4:25 PM | Report abuse
Republicans criticize democrats for being disloyal to their party. But, that's what it means to truly have values. It's not just something that you preach to other people. You actually live by them. So when your party does something foolish you don't stand by them just because its your party. You have to make noise. Otherwise, they make you look like drones and fools.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 4:08 PM | Report abuse
As a Registered Nurse, I have seen my share of pregnant women. The story about Sara Palen's 5th child makes no medical sense. Why?
1)Sara Palin traveled (in her 3rd trimester) over 6 hours to Texas to give a speech. No obstetrician would allow a 3rd trimester pregnant woman, let alone a 44 year old woman, to travel She is considered "a high risk" pregnancy.
2) Supposedly, her water broke while in Texas. Having had 4 previous children, she would have gone into labor and delivered very quickly.
3) She flew back to Alaska, and the pilot and flight attendants saw NO evidence of discomfort/labor.
4) She did NOT go to a hospital after arriving, but, went somewhere else.
5) Her daughter was conveniently out of school for >6months, supposedly for mono.
6)) It is highly unlikely that a 7 to 8 month pregnant woman could tuck her blouse into her skirt. Sara Palin's photos show just that.
Thus, this child could not possibly be her child, but rather her grandchild. I guess it is easier to blame the daughter for the current pregnancy, than to admit to lying to her constituents all these months.
Posted by: P | September 2, 2008 3:34 PM | Report abuse
Jane wrote: Regardless of her family values, which do seem a bit questionable... she is in no way qualified to be a major player in national politics. If the GOP is going to push that Obama is too inexperienced, how does selecting a woman with two years of experience as the governer of a totally obscure state help their cause???
-------
Okay, Jane, you do know Obama's mother did the same thing only with a man not of her race or religion, much older and married?
Talk about questionable family values! And, did you also know that Obama is running for President, not Vice President? That's a pretty big difference when it comes to the experience factor. Especially given that Obama's mother passed away at age 53 and McCain's is still going strong at 96. And, how many years has Obama smoked cigarettes? The man could keel over at any time.
Listen, Pal, as McCain would say, I'll take John and Sarah's values over Obama and Biden's any day.
Posted by: Jaycee | September 2, 2008 3:17 PM | Report abuse
*okay from a teenage girls point of view*
Pregnancy isn't glorified. at all. i dont know a single 16/ 17 year old who wants a child for the hell of it. but we are still all going to have SEX. its not the goverments desicion on that matter. its free will remember? so let educate the youth of america! (its a new concept..) they learn to use a condom or learn about birth control and what do you know less pregnant teenagers!
*******BUT THATS NOT THE ISSUE!!!!!!!!
so why dont we think about whats let say.. important? hmm?
like who you are going to vote for?
like who is going to shape this nation?
who is going to LEAD the nation the most sucessful way to the most amount of people.. because no matter what less than half the nation is going to dissagree with the next commander in chief.
so lets LOOK AT THE CANIDATES and NOT THEIR FAMILIES!!!
the two basically unknown canidates from the independent party
Obama from the democrats
and McCain from the republic
LOGIC 101
Posted by: Erica E | September 2, 2008 3:06 PM | Report abuse
..again...where's the data on age at conception (5 to 6 months ago) for these two. Is there a criminal charge that is being covered up?
Posted by: Jim Bell | September 2, 2008 2:22 PM | Report abuse
I moved to the US from Canada five years ago and have lived here through the last election and now this one. I have to say - that from my vantage point, it feels like the media favors the republican party. If this was the Democratic VP - the Republican party would be all over it, saying "...how can Sarah control the country if she can't control her family?" I don't agree with that statement, I think it's onesided and unfair to the voters to distract from the important issues. However, the republicans just seem to find a way to get out of these "scandals" with more of the media's help than would a democrat. As an outsider, with some perspective, I definitely see a bias. Sadly, your friends north of the border will probably weep if another republican is voted in...maybe the media should poll their neigbors instead of just guessing at what would improve foreign relations.
Posted by: JM | September 2, 2008 2:13 PM | Report abuse
Seems like John Edwards, while running for the Democratic presidential nomination, and fathering a baby while having an extramarital affair against his cancer-stricken wife, is a much bigger deal than an Alaskan teenager getting pregnant. Where are the media's priorities?
Posted by: RM | September 2, 2008 2:06 PM | Report abuse
Regardless of her family values, which do seem a bit questionable (I am tempted to agree with the notion that this is meant to divert attention from the Trig rumours...I guess we'll see in a few months!) she is in no way qualified to be a major player in national politics. If the GOP is going to push that Obama is too inexperienced, how does selecting a woman with two years of experience as the governer of a totally obscure state help their cause??? Not to mention the clip of her stating that she doesn't know what the VP does from day to day...WOW. How people could be missing the blatent pandering for Hillary's supporters is baffling to me. ("I'm going to break the glass ceiling that Hillary put 18,000 cracks in" ...while being so against increasing women's right to choose..gah) And her 90% approval rating? That's from a town of 9,000 people who all lean very very far right. She's pretty, she's young, and she owns a gun. What more could the bible belt Christian right need as a reason to vote for her??
Posted by: Kate | September 2, 2008 2:05 PM | Report abuse
Is it something unheard of, no. Will it happen to thousands of teenage Americans this year alone, yes.
The fact that Palin's daughter will marry someone because of a mistake is the scary issue in all this. On mistake should not lead to another.
Palin's views on family values have now been put to the test, and they should. Her role is to convince voters to support her based on her beliefs.
Her daughter has made a decision (pre-marital sex) based on what she believed which was influenced by her upbringing.
I don't think that democrats should criticized yet since the candidates have yet to comment about the situation. But if they bring Palin's beliefs to the forefront , that would only be normal.
Posted by: middleground | September 2, 2008 2:04 PM | Report abuse
To my mind it's not Bristol's pregnancy that has political significance, it's her impending marriage to an 18-year-old self-proclaimed "red neck" and boozer who doesn't want children. This sounds like the kind of fore-doomed marriage a caring mother would want to steer her daughter away from. It's bad enough that Sarah Palin approves of the marriage. The real scandal will be if it comes out that she pressured the teenagers into it.
Posted by: Ageofreason | September 2, 2008 2:01 PM | Report abuse
Having a fifth child after 40, pregnant unwed teens,trying to get an ex brother-in-law fired from his job for dissing ones sister...All this is befitting of a Jeff Foxworthy sequel....
The image this portrays to the rest of the world is that America is a mess. We once were looked up to as a leader by example now we are looking more like a late nite cable drama. Well schooled and intelligent thinkers are labeled as liberals. Half ass caucasian eubonics gets people elected. Waive the flag, cite the constitution while abusing its meaning, spew chapter and verse and scare the masses - without any doubt 20% of the population harbors 80% of reasoning. Too bad their one vote didn't equal three. Instead of challenging the majority to think up, it's easier and more effective to talk down.I blame the media and I especially blame those seeking out attention for personal gain through sensationalism by self perceived extrodinary acts. People seek meaningless endeavors when their lives are meaningless. There are so many things wrong here on so many different levels its disturbing to even list them.
Posted by: jameo | September 2, 2008 1:47 PM | Report abuse
When I heard that Governor Palin was the VP pick for John McCain, I was pretty intrigued. She's definetly seen as a bit of a maverick in her own state, she has bipartisan credentials, she is strong in her Christian faith, she's very set against corruption and the status quo, she has executive experience, and he has a very nice family by all accounts. What's not to like? Talk about a fantastic combination of personal and professional attribtes! The GOP has every right to be pleased with the selection, and Republicans have really turned up the heat in the race by making such a bold choice. It's commendable. I won't be voting for Senator McCain for many other reasons, but that doesn't mean that I can't appreciate the kind of groundbreaking selection he's made.
Honestly, my perception of Governor Palin has not changed since revelations about her daughter's pregnancy made the news. It's really not that surprising. Teens get pregnant all the time, and the family faith or political stance doesn't determine it. I hear a lot of comments on this page and others that insist that we liberals are dragging the poor kid through the muck. Some of my left-leaning brethren are indeed seeing it as proof of bad parenting or poor family management or proof of the failure of abstinence-only sex education. Really, though, there's no dragging and there's no muck. What many of us on the left also realize is that unplanned/unintended pregnancy knows no barriers -- it happens to every demographic group in every part of the country and in every community of faith. Naturally, it's a big step for the Governor's daughter, and I'm sure the Governor will be supportive of the child and the shotgun union.
If you look at the news cycle, it's a great time to get this tidbit out in the open because there are so many other things going on. It'll blow away in a couple days. What it may do, however, is accelerate the pace of digging into the Governor's background and family, and there may be a few more bones rattling around in their cupboards. Senator Obama was able to pre-empt a lot of the same kind of digging by publishing all of his past a long time ago. To those who say that the Obama family would have fared differently under a similar type of issue or scrutiny as the Palin family is encountering, I disagree. The only thing that this news item points out is that the whole Palin family needed to be prepared by the Governor of Alaska for the inevitable attention. I sense that she did not do this planning, which is unfortunate because she seems to have such a lovely family with such great accomplishments and promise.
Posted by: LiberalFromDenver | September 2, 2008 1:01 PM | Report abuse
What really amazes me is there were a large number of posts about how Palin should have had an abortion when she knew her child had Down's Syndrome and she had no business having a child because she was too old. Now the same people are saying it's her daughter's child. They went from wanting to execute a child because of a disability to wanting to persecute a 17 year old girl for having sex. If that's they kind of change they're pushing they can "keep the change". Obama's inability to keep his "nut" roots from behaving in this immoral fashion shows just how effective a leader he really is. Let's just put the whole conspiracy theory to rest because we know for a fact the child belongs to Governor Palin because we already know about the positive tests for Down Syndrome. This is the typical "Chicago" style politics we can expect from Obama and his supporters. That is why I would have voted for Hillary, but now I'm voting for the only real change left, McCain.
Posted by: McSane | September 2, 2008 1:00 PM | Report abuse
Hopefully this unfortunate and awkward situation can lead to a rational national discussion on the failed policy of supporting Abstinence-only programs in our public schools. The youth of this nation needs to be educated and empowered in this area. To provide them with any less is a crime and a great disservice to the future of the nation. I'm glad that the Palin family has found peace with the situation and that Bristol will be raising this child in a loving environment. (Though, I do wonder if she's being forced into marrying this guy). But if that's their choice, then all the best to them!
Posted by: Matthew | September 2, 2008 12:46 PM | Report abuse
not being nosy, just skeptical. unfortunately, rovian politics dictates that we be somewhat skeptical during political campaigns. if there is a cover-up on top of a cover-up, questions should be asked.
Posted by: roved over | September 2, 2008 12:42 PM | Report abuse
Bristol "The Pistol" Palin sure knows about sex. It's too bad that she did not have information that Planned Parenthood could have provided. Now the GOP has a Veep candidate more appropriate to being a guest on Jerry Springer's old shows than to a position one malignancy from the Presidency.
Posted by: tanaS | September 2, 2008 12:31 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "More disturbing is the fact that Palin and her husband were both members of the Alaskan Independence Party.
Ms. Palin, when were you first really proud to be an American? Presumably, after you left a party calling for a vote for Alaska to leave the USA."
So, I was once a member of a party called the Democratic Party, and so was akmost every one in my state. Then we learned better and every elected official in the state of over 26 million is Republican. That has happened in 40 years. How fast they fall when you take a look at them.
Posted by: Bill | September 2, 2008 12:09 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "I would like to see or read about the results of at least TWO independent pregnancy tests confirming that Bristol is pregnant. I’m THAT suspicious. She just happens to be five-months-pregnant as the rumors and discussion about the son being the governor’s grandson start to shoot across the Internet. COME ON! I predict that one of the next headlines in this story will read, “Miscarriage!” This is crazy."
No, you are not "that suspicious". You are that NOSY. A true lib who feeds on this stuff. It is none of your business, until the daughter is running for VP. Palin has more accomplishments than Obama or Hillary Clinton, and has not been PROVEN to be a habitual liar like Hillary.
Go eat another potato chip and try to find a Jerry Springer re-run and your "suspicions" might go away.
Posted by: Bill | September 2, 2008 12:01 PM | Report abuse
she's not pregnant
Posted by: riding | September 2, 2008 11:43 AM
Hmmmmm .... must have happened in the break time right after bible study, but just before the sex ed abstinence class ...
* Republicans: supporting life right up until birth.
Posted by: Suz | September 2, 2008 11:38 AM
Wow . . . I guess I am done here. I thought I would expect better from Washington Post readers. My point has been proved entirely. The point is: beware lest you become every that you accuse the other side of being in terms of tone, hatred, judgmentalism or worse! I would have to go with worse by what I have read. Even contempt of some on the other side wanting their young people to have Bible classes??? Listen to yourselves! You have become what you supposedly oppose!I am out of here.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 12:00 PM | Report abuse
"Seriously saying the "Republicans would say the same things if it was a Democrat's daughter..." is ridiculous. And even if it were true, how about taking the high road and NOT do what you say the evil Republicans would do? Doing or saying something just because someone else did or would do it...is a very childish excuse.
Believe what you will about Sarah Palin and her family, but take responsibility for the words you write."
Anon, I'd have a lot more sympathy for this point of view if the Republicans hadn't plumbed new depths in slimemongering in the past 20 years. Honestly, there is no way the Republican noise machine wouldn't make hay out a revelation like this on the Democratic side.
Do you think Democrats should "take the high road" when the opposition never has?
Don't be naive. This is politics, not Sunday school. They will (and should) use whatever it takes to win.
Posted by: DB | September 2, 2008 11:58 AM | Report abuse
she's not pregnant
Posted by: riding | September 2, 2008 11:43 AM | Report abuse
Hmmmmm .... must have happened in the break time right after bible study, but just before the sex ed abstinence class ...
* Republicans: supporting life right up until birth.
Posted by: Suz | September 2, 2008 11:38 AM | Report abuse
"The old saying about the apple not falling far from the tree needed an update; 'The wheels don't roll far from the trailer'."
Rednecks? Trailer Trash? What do you expect from Alaska? Shame! Shame! Shame! What kind of country are you going to build when you have such contempt and vitriol for people not as "enlightened" as yourselves? Why would I ever believe that you have the best interest of the little guy in mind? It reminds me of the explicative filled political yard signs and bumper stickers of the compassionate "progress" community I used to live near. This is compassion? Again, I totally despise the rumor-mongering by right wingers against Democrats present and in the past. Don't give me the "Republicans would do this" arguments. When the right wing does it is wrong, but what about the disgraceful words of the "compassionate" progressives in this comment section?
Posted by: Brian | September 2, 2008 11:36 AM | Report abuse
The old saying about the apple not falling far from the tree needed an update; "The wheels don't roll far from the trailer".
Thanks GOP
Posted by: kevin | September 2, 2008 11:05 AM | Report abuse
Seriously saying the "Republicans would say the same things if it was a Democrat's daughter..." is ridiculous. And even if it were true, how about taking the high road and NOT do what you say the evil Republicans would do? Doing or saying something just because someone else did or would do it...is a very childish excuse.
Believe what you will about Sarah Palin and her family, but take responsibility for the words you write.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 10:35 AM | Report abuse
Ummm. There are people who live in Idiotville thinking Obama's camp is getting at Palin's daughter for being a teen mom.
Obama IS born from a TEEN MOM!
He is clearly a living example of that situation.
Conservatards, do your homework next time.
Posted by: Non-Conservative for life! | September 2, 2008 10:19 AM | Report abuse
What a joke.Sarah Palin would become the least qualified VP of all time and is ill suited to be President.
Nice family values candidate. Must be against birth control.
The psychologically damaged McCain who lacks the temperment to be President according to former Republican Senator Santorum will be way too OLD to be President.
In year 4, McCain is going to be 77 folks.Talk about napping on the job.
Posted by: anonymous | September 2, 2008 10:14 AM | Report abuse
Here below is my earlier post spell-checked lest someone try to pile on me for being an "uneducated" trailer dweller or whatever smear that some lurk here would like to use. I have read more of the comments below, and I am dumbfounded. Redneck is not used of the Palins, but trailer trash is and there are innuendos of incest and similar insults toward the people of Alaska. Shame! Shame! Shame! What kind of country will you build with your contempt for certain classes of people? Here is my previous post corrected for those of you who use the presence of typos to belittle people:
"The responses on this thread epitomizes
why I do not believe the liberals' feigned compassion. Think about what you are writing! Before someone spouts back that right-wingers do the same thing, I will say that I cannot stand the rumor-mongering on the other side (Obama is a secret Muslim, the Clintons had political enemies murdered, etc., etc.). Bringing up the actions of the right wing nutjobs is a red herring. Take responsibility for what you write. Some of you seemed to be insinuating that the Palins are backwoods, bumpkins. If the "red----" word has not been used yet, then that is exactly what many of you are insinuating concerning the Palins. Your contempt for people not as "enlightened" as yourselves is palpable. I would be scared to death if folks with such contempt for their fellow human beings ever achieved near total power."
Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 10:13 AM | Report abuse
Maybe Bristol is not pregnant after all. Maybe she is faking the pregnancy to "prove" that she's not Trig's mother. Maybe there will be no new baby. This is better than The Young and Restless...
Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 10:10 AM | Report abuse
Let's see here:
Chelsea Clinton(no scandals)
Bush Girls(Underaged Drinking)
Biden's children(no scandals)
Palin's daughter(teen pregnancy)
Oh, yes. Republicans have a grip on family values! :)
Posted by: Mad Value Sized | September 2, 2008 10:10 AM | Report abuse
The father of the baby said it best...I'M A REDNECK!"
Indeed you are. Indeed you are!LMAO!
Posted by: Redneck Palin | September 2, 2008 10:06 AM | Report abuse
So someone on here stated" You can't control your children"in support of Palin.
I bet you are the same dense person who skewered Obama about his preacher(not even related to him!).
If you can't control your child,then how can you control the country?
Posted by: Non-Idiot for 2008 | September 2, 2008 10:04 AM | Report abuse
Let's see:
*The father said on his Myspace page clearly that he did NOT want kids.
*Liberals are constantly vilified for not having "family values"
One poster said it best: " it's okay for Republicans to disregard values, but not Democrats.
Hypocracy is what Republicans live and die by.
Posted by: Republicans are Wetodded | September 2, 2008 10:00 AM | Report abuse
Straight talk.
I supported John McCain in 2000 and did not vote for a Democrat in the Presidential election.
I will not support John McCain in 2008 and will vote for a Democrat in the Presidential election.
His questionable selection of Mrs. Palin as VP is my reason for the change.
Posted by: George | September 2, 2008 9:57 AM | Report abuse
Hey Conservatives, Rif said it best!
You're either for or against teen pregnancy
Just like you turds yelled to us liberals:
You're either for or against the war in Iraq.
Hmmmmm. The tables turn.......
Posted by: You're For or Against Me! | September 2, 2008 9:54 AM | Report abuse
The responses on this thread eptomizes why I do not believe the liberals' feigned compassion. Think about what you are writing! Before someone spouts back that right-wingers do the same thing, I will say that I cannot stand the rumor-monging on the other side (Obama is a secret Muslim, the Clintons had political enemies murdered, etc., etc.). Bringing up the actions of the right wing nutjobs is a red herring. Take responsibility for what you write. Some of you seemed to be insinuating that the Palins are backwoods, bumpkins. If the "red----" word has been used yet, then that is exactly what many of you are insinuating concerning the Palins. Your contempt for people not as "enlighted" as youselves is palpable. I would be scared to death if folks with such contempt for their fellow human beings ever acheived near total power.
Posted by: Brian | September 2, 2008 9:30 AM | Report abuse
I definetly feel that John McCain is desperate and his desperation has clouded what was once good judgement. If the tables were turned and Obama had a 17 year old child who was 5 months pregnant, it would be considered an international incident and the republicans would have a filed day citing that his lack morals, inability of raising a family, and even more, running a country. Why was 16 year old Jamie Lynn Spears trashed for her pregnancy but it is accepted and spun into being o.k. for Palin’s daughter Bristol which was obviously hidden until now? It scares me to think that if something were to happen to John McCain that she would be incharge of our country. A governor of Alaska with limited expereince is detatched from the major cities in the USA which are plagued with issues that need to be addressed immediately! I don’t see how anyone who has lived in the USA for the last 8 years could possible vote for an unconstitutional 3rd Bush/ McCain/ Palin term.
Posted by: Eric Davis | September 2, 2008 9:12 AM | Report abuse
Of course!
If You are Republican, its A-okay to have your teen daughter get pregnant.
If You are Democrat, it's WRONG!!!!!!!
I bet anyone all the money they have in the world that if Barack Obama's daughter was a tenn and pregnant, the Republicans would have racked that ossue over the coals BIG TIME!
Abstinence Only, my a**!
Posted by: Okay To Be Republican & Pregnant! | September 2, 2008 8:41 AM | Report abuse
Best wishes to the Palin family and the grandchild on the way.
Why, please tell me, would a mother put her daughter in this position --to cover up her pregnancy with a blanket and baby brother? What does this tell us about Palin, and McCain who supposedly knew. What does this tell us about the transparancy and honesty of leadership?
Why didn't they just introduce the Palin family honestly -- a mother of five with a grandchild on the way. Oh, and by the way, the grandchild is out of wedlock, but this is a family thing like so many millions.
Geesh!
Prediction: The next shoe to drop is Todd Palin's women. Sahra will not last long on the ticket. The GOP is toast.
Again, best wishes to the Palin family. They will have many burdens.
Posted by: Thunder | September 2, 2008 8:38 AM | Report abuse
...."they loaded up the truck and moved to Beverly"....
Posted by: jameo | September 2, 2008 8:33 AM | Report abuse
I think it would be terrific to have an under-educated, superstitious rube as Commander-in-Chief of the US military with her finger on the "nucular" trigger!
I think it would be great to put a regular old mediocre dysfunctional family in the White House to guide the nation!
I think the rest of the world will be most impressed with how our society has chosen to make the highest offices in the land part of reality television!
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 2, 2008 8:14 AM | Report abuse
With all of the many accomplishments under her belt, I assume Palin will be able to handle the job of vice president even with two infants in the family.
Posted by: Kathy | September 2, 2008 8:03 AM | Report abuse
Hi kaleigh
is what say about gov palin and her family needing her not also true for sen obama??
he puts his EVEN YOUNGER daughters in the spotlight and even more so should he be elected. he doesn't have or won't have enough time for them !! i think raisung kids is for both - mother AND father so i don't understand why again and again only the mothers are being dubbed .
Posted by: coli | September 2, 2008 6:46 AM | Report abuse
It's a mess. If this story was put out to detract attention from Trig's parentage it failed. She would have been better advised just to make her medical records public. The 18 year old hockey player outed as Bristol's unborn baby's father says he doesn't want kids - why then announce the forthcoming marriage and the challenges they're going to face as parents. A shotgun wedding isn't going to help matters, especially when Bristol has a 26 year old boyfriend as well as the 'official' highschool boyfriend.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 6:29 AM | Report abuse
It is amazing how many people think that they have Sarah Palin pegged. It seems like we are clinging to any criticism or opportunity to judge her personal life. Don't waste your vote by voting for a candidate based on whether or not their 17 year old is pregnant and what you think that means about the candidate.
Why are we assuming that this was Sarah Palin's fault? Children don't always share their parents' beliefs. If her daughter was an atheist would this get blamed on her too? Would she be unfit for national service as a result?
I now understand how Jerry Springer stayed on the air for so many years......people really feel superior when given the opportunity to focus on the perceived shortcomings of others.
I am not a republican but have to say that John McCain picked an amazing public servant to be his running mate. Governor Palin has an 80% approval rating as Alaska's governor for good reason. In two and a half years as governor, she has turned Alaska's political world upside down. She has successfully brought both democrats and republicans to the table to do the job that they were elected to do. She gets things done and is ethical in the process.
If Sarah Palin can do on a national level what she has been able to do in Alaska, this country will move in the right direction.
Posted by: Kathy | September 2, 2008 6:08 AM | Report abuse
Suddenly it all makes sense!
When the McCain camp wanted to reach out to their midwestern Republican base, they "vetted" the most familiar VP for them: someone with 5 kids, a screechy voice, a hunting husband, and a pregnant teenage daughter! (haha, kidding, relax folks).
In all seriousness....Palin is a total disaster for the McCain campaign, and I really feel sorry for her to have been thrown into all of this.
She was in a great place in her life career wise, and dealing with both raising a family and helping her daughter. And can you imagine being her 17 year old daughter who has spent most of her life in a tiny town, now having to deal with all this crap?
This whole thing sounds strangely familiar to those stories you see on Court TV about the families who won the lottery, couldn't handle the pressure and exposure, and ended up being way worse off.
My prediction: Sarah Palin is gonna ask to NOT be on the ticket before November.
Posted by: Ahhh I see | September 2, 2008 5:59 AM | Report abuse
For Susan Eisenhower and Obamacans.
I bet Dwight and Mamie Eisenhower danced to this tune. Our grandparents did too.
Rudy Valle Rudy Vallee - Orchids In The Moonlight
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsGDKJJvik8
Vote Obama/Biden '08
Posted by: Eagle Ch’áak’s Son | September 2, 2008 5:43 AM | Report abuse
Who cares if her Daughter is pregnant.
She is against sex education and birth control, if thats what you believe vote for her.
She thinks Global Warming is not man made, if thats what you believe vote for her.
She thinks that the way to get independent of oil is to drill in nature parks, if thats what you believe vote for her.
She thinks that Polar Bears should not be listed as endangered because that would block people from drilling for oil in their habitat, if thats what you believe vote for her.
I can't see how some one running for VP, could not care about the environment and be so for drilling for oil.
I thought hardcore christians like her would want to be the stewards and care takers of the earth like the book of Genesis says we are.
I mean one positive if we slow Global Warming we will NOT have as many HUGE hurricanes like we have today.
How about looking into clean energy instead, because believe it or not there is no gas shortage at this time, the oil companies are just putting the screws to us because of demand. One day oil will be depleted though and so will our planet be depleted of life as it drowns in it's own blood of oil and dies.
Why not kill two birds with one stone and start using other clean methods of energy and start healing the environment?
I think we can all agree on that.
Unfortunately the government is controlled by the oil companies, yes the Democrats and Republicans are both in their pocket, the republicans are just proud to be public about it.
We live in a capitalist world and helping mother nature currently does not make a profit, free energy does not make a profit, so nothing will be done about it unless a crisis happens or the people rise up and demand it.
Posted by: DEE | September 2, 2008 4:49 AM | Report abuse
Sarah Palin, this is so ridiculous I can't even seriously think about it! And,
now all the trailer park like behavior begins to spill out. If my 17 year old daughter became preg. I don't think I'd accept a position that would put her in the spot light. What is this woman thinking? N
Posted by: cj | September 2, 2008 4:28 AM | Report abuse
Regarding below, apparently in addition to feminism, this anonymous commenter shows us that spelling, grammar and literacy are also only for liberals.
Posted by: Mads | September 2, 2008 4:24 AM | Report abuse
Isn't the baby's father, Levi Johnston, the man the Palin kids call "Uncle Levi"? Not really a "young" man, is he? Isn't this the 57-year-old "friend of the family" who has been spending a lot of time with the Palin girls since their mother has been so busy politicking? A man who supposedly "thinks of the girls as [his] own daughters", a man who campaigned fiercely against sex education in Alaska public schools?? No, it's not? Hmm...well, it certainly sounded plausible enough when I re-read it.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 4:23 AM | Report abuse
Republican Football Fan.
Susan Eisenhower: Barack is the best choice (CNN Interview)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1Kmsv8-Jzk&feature=related
When Dwight Eisenhower's granddaughter Susan said "Yes we can!" over 84,000 supporters at the Democrat Convention cheered her on and yelled "Yes we can!"
My Favorite Eisenhower Story From Wikipedia. Dwight could have been a Professional Football player?
At West Point, Eisenhower made the football team. He started as a varsity running back and linebacker in 1912. In a bit of a fabled match-up, he even tackled the legendary Jim Thorpe in a 1912 game.
Obamacans for Obama/Biden '08
Posted by: Repubican Football Fan | September 2, 2008 4:18 AM | Report abuse
According to the bloggers women should just hide when they get pregnant. Where is the praise for McCain sticking with his choice. He would not of demonstrate good values by abandoning Palin even though he thought she was best for the job. Feminist aren't for women, they are for liberals.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 3:51 AM | Report abuse
I'm already sick of this woman. Three days into it and how many scandals now?
I wonder what news we will hear about Wasilla De'Ville tomorrow!
stay tuned
Posted by: enoughofgop2008 | September 2, 2008 3:49 AM | Report abuse
Michelle Obama is the wife of David Palmer in the series 24. It's freaking scary how similar they are. Cheryl Palmer = Michelle Obama. Go watch some episodes and you will see the evil familiarities.
Posted by: 24 | September 2, 2008 3:41 AM | Report abuse
While there are over 1000 news reports on a 17 year old being pregnant who happens to be the VP choice, only one news outlet is mentioning that the Alaska trooper and former brother in law to Sarah Plain used a taser against a child and was cited for violations of the law many times in the last four years--- and he is the focus of the bogus trooper gate headlines in whose stories there is no mention of his abuses.
"Then there's trooper Mike Wooten, who used a Taser on his stepson, Palin's nephew Payton. Wooten has been reprimanded for violating nearly a dozen laws and departmental policies since December 2001."
Posted by: george washington | September 2, 2008 3:33 AM | Report abuse
Hi I am Barack Obama! I don't look like you cuz I am black. My wife thinks that all you whites are racist because she is stuck in the 1950's. I tried explaining the her that it's time to change and she understood. So she tried blending in with the whites on the cover of people magazine with me. We wish we were white so we didn't have to hate whites. Our daughters were supposed to be aborted but Michelle over slept the day of her appt. She tried re-scheduling but they told her human life began at conception. She tried cutting the babies out but Jeremiah Wright told her to re focus her anger about how the white people did this to her. I told Jeremiah that I did not agree with him but I still made him the guest of honor at my fundraiser. He sat next to Tony Rezko. They got drunk at accidently touched hands. But that's ok because I got a picture of it to show all my gay friends in Hollywood that I threw a great party. I wish I remembered what I was going to write next but my teleprompter gave out. OH Well err. duh,err duh,err doe. Joe get me a oe40 out of the fridge.
Posted by: Barack Obama | September 2, 2008 3:33 AM | Report abuse
TALE OF THE TAPE ON CELEBRATED TEEN
PREGNANCY AND FAMILY VALUES.
1.Jamie Lynn Name of Teenage Bristol Palin
Spears Culprit
2. 16 years Age 17 years
3. 3 months State of Pregnancy 5 months
at time of publicity
4.Sister, Notable relative Mother, Sarah
Britney Spears, Palin, Alaska
an acclaimed Gov.& GOP's
celebrity who has veep nominee
Sen.John McCain as an
unwilling fan
5.Wore a big Public effort Carried baby
oversized coat at hiding baby brother over
bump her swollen
& protruding
stomach during
her mother's
introduction as
John McCain's running mate.
6.Somewhat Family Image High moral dysfunctional ground
7.Laissez-faire Public Image Hypocrites
LESSON:
McCain's judgment is suspiciously faulty. It will always happen whenever his error-tainted gene becomes dominant.
Posted by: Reggie Billy | September 2, 2008 3:25 AM | Report abuse
Isn't the issue that having a VP candidate with a pregnant teen daughter sends the wrong message to our youth about teen pregnancy? It almost glorifies it.
Ascribing no blame to Sarah Palin, if McCain knew about the pregnancy he should not have chosen her because the pregnant teenage daughter is simply not a good role model for girls. If he didn't know, it shows poor vetting and poor judgment and he shouldn't be President.
Posted by: Joanne | September 2, 2008 3:23 AM | Report abuse
Republican family values? Looks like Sarah Palin failed at helping her 17 year old daughter avoid becoming pregnant out of wedlock and well short of Bristol having completed an education that will give Bristol a shred of the opportunities her own mother had. It's shocking that Sarah Palin would have no shame at all about getting so ego-involved in politics to run for governor and letting her own parenting slide to the point of failing to guide her oldest daughter. Shame on Sarah Palin! Opportunity for women apparently means, for Republican women, means sacrificing your family, including your daughters, to advance your own selfish interests. This is not a role model for women I want my daughters to follow.
Posted by: Karl Boettner | September 2, 2008 3:19 AM | Report abuse
Sorry you are really slow but she is the governor of Alaska. She makes decisions like balancing a budget which senators don't do. She makes decisions on how to protect her citizens like governors do. She is head of the National Gaurd of Alaska, so she has more experience with being a commmander in cheif. She runs the state. Senators vote on bills. Some senators create bills to vote on. Barack Obama has never been the author of one single bill. What does he do? He votes present like a big puss
Posted by: For Dogzilla | September 2, 2008 3:19 AM | Report abuse
Sorry you are really slow but she is the governor of Alaska. She makes decisions like balancing a budget which senators don't do. She makes decisions on how to protect her citizens like governors do. She is head of the National Gaurd of Alaska, so she has more experience with being a commmander in cheif. She runs the state. Senators vote on bills. Some senators create bills to vote on. Barack Obama has never been the author of one single bill. What does he do? He votes present like a big puss
Posted by: For Dogzilla | September 2, 2008 3:19 AM | Report abuse
Sorry you are really slow but she is the governor of Alaska. She makes decisions like balancing a budget which senators don't do. She makes decisions on how to protect her citizens like governors do. She is head of the National Gaurd of Alaska, so she has more experience with being a commmander in cheif. Joe Biden is a racist
Posted by: Executive Experience | September 2, 2008 3:19 AM | Report abuse
Sorry you are really slow but she is the governor of Alaska. She makes decisions like balancing a budget which senators don't do. She makes decisions on how to protect her citizens like governors do. She is head of the National Gaurd of Alaska, so she has more experience with being a commmander in cheif. She runs the state. Senators vote on bills. Some senators create bills to vote on. Barack Obama has never been the author of one single bill. What does he do? He votes present like a big p u s e
Posted by: For Dogzilla | September 2, 2008 3:19 AM | Report abuse
Sorry you are really slow but she is the governor of Alaska. She makes decisions like balancing a budget which senators don't do. She makes decisions on how to protect her citizens like governors do. She is head of the National Gaurd of Alaska, so she has more experience with being a commmander in cheif. She runs the state. Senators vote on bills. Some senators create bills to vote on. Barack Obama has never been the author of one single bill. What does he do? He votes present like a big puss
Posted by: Executive Experience | September 2, 2008 3:19 AM | Report abuse
Sorry you are really slow but she is the governor of Alaska. She makes decisions like balancing a budget which senators don't do. She makes decisions on how to protect her citizens like governors do. She is head of the National Gaurd of Alaska, so she has more experience with being a commmander in cheif. She runs the state. Senators vote on bills. Some senators create bills to vote on. Barack Obama has never been the author of one single bill. What does he do? He votes present like a big p u s e
Posted by: For Dogzilla | September 2, 2008 3:19 AM | Report abuse
No one can control their sons and daughters. Haven't you learned from your own youth. Kids lie all the time. Having a kid is the most wonderful thing in the world and I am a young father and wouldn't change it ever. Sarah Palin is just being a good mom and supporting her daughter. The only thing wrong with this situation is that it takes focus of who Barack really is. Barack's wife is an angry racist woman. His preacher is an angry old black man. His campaign is based on bashing Bush who is gone in less than 5 months. He has no plans for all the issues he says that he will fix. His solution to the problems with the economy is to tax more on businesses. Look at Japan right now, they are in a real recession because they don't offer business tax incentives. I am doing just fine in the crisis of the economy, because I save money and have personal responsibility. It is not the job of the government to tell me how to live. Stand up for yourself. Anyone who says the opposite of me obviously always got a participation trophy in the elementary days so they didn't cry.
Posted by: NoOneCan | September 2, 2008 3:08 AM | Report abuse
McCain's campaign doesn't lie like Obama's campaign. They offered this information free. This has nothing to do with politics. No one can control their child unless they take away civil liberties. I guess that is what the democrats goal is. They could of just shown hospital records to back Trygg's birth and the picture of Sarah being fat instead they share with the american public not hide things. Obama hides Tony Rezco, Jereimah Wright, jesse Jackson, Bill Ayers (the terrorist bomber), his half brother in Kenya who is poor and the Millionaire does not support. The fact he attended two seprate Islamic charter schools in Indonesia. The list goes on...
Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 3:08 AM | Report abuse
McCain's campaign doesn't lie like Obama's campaign. They offered this information free. This has nothing to do with politics. No one can control their child unless they take away civil liberties. I guess that is what the democrats goal is. They could of just shown hospital records to back Trygg's birth and the picture of Sarah being fat instead they share with the american public not hide things. Obama hides Tony Rezco, Jereimah Wright, jesse Jackson, Bill Ayers (the terrorist bomber), his half brother in Kenya who is poor and the Millionaire does not support. The fact he attended two seprate Islamic charter schools in Indonesia. The list goes on...
Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 3:07 AM | Report abuse
Please define "Executive Experience".
Posted by: Dogzilla | September 2, 2008 3:07 AM | Report abuse
Please define "Executive Experience".
Posted by: Dogzilla | September 2, 2008 3:06 AM | Report abuse
McCain's campaign doesn't lie like Obama's campaign. They offered this information free. This has nothing to do with politics. No one can control their child unless they take away civil liberties. I guess that is what the democrats goal is. They could of just shown hospital records to back Trygg's birth and the picture of Sarah being fat instead they share with the american public not hide things. Obama hides Tony Rezco, Jereimah Wright, jesse Jackson, Bill Ayers (the terrorist bomber), his half brother in Kenya who is poor and the Millionaire does not support. The fact he attended two seprate Islamic charter schools in Indonesia. The list goes on...
Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 3:06 AM | Report abuse
Please define "Executive Experience".
Posted by: Dogzilla | September 2, 2008 3:06 AM | Report abuse
I would like to see or read about the results of at least TWO independent pregnancy tests confirming that Bristol is pregnant. I’m THAT suspicious. She just happens to be five-months-pregnant as the rumors and discussion about the son being the governor’s grandson start to shoot across the Internet. COME ON! I predict that one of the next headlines in this story will read, “Miscarriage!” This is crazy.
Posted by: de | September 2, 2008 3:06 AM | Report abuse
It's so funny how all the people on the left are presuming what would happen if it were Barack Obama's daughter who was pregnant. They say the right would be saying the same thing. Get a clue...That is not the reality so discuss something like why does Sarah Palin have more executive experience than Obama, Biden, McCain. Also if she had an abortion you would be saying worse things. Democrats are bitter and pathetic. PS Joe Biden is a racist.
Posted by: YourWrong | September 2, 2008 2:59 AM | Report abuse
I guess conservatives are supporting Bristol because they love women to get married when they are still teenager and get no education. Thus, men can dominate the lives of all women. Conservatives who are asking liberals not to attack should not have done so against Hillary and Chelsea. They started it. But with one small difference. Chelsea never became pregnant when she was 17. I guess she was intelligent. After all, she went to Stanford. Her mom went to Yale not like Bristol's mom who was stupid enough not to get admission in top universities and ended up in University of Idah. LOL. Like mother like daughter.
Posted by: Michelle | September 2, 2008 2:58 AM | Report abuse
I really dont care how conservative she preaches to be, or how with it she wants to play, Palin screwed up.And no moral majority or and brow beaters out there are going to convince anyone otherwise.Yeah, they are just like any other American family, except you have a pregnant minor living in your house,even as she stumped with John on friday of how Conservative she was, how far to the right she was even moreso than McCain( which frankly, im a liberal and im further right than john is).
The focus mix here is astounding, and the polls will be skewed, not because of the convention, but because of the controversy, and we'll be tormented by all the "corporate" news game shows until our ears bleed.
This past couple of weeks should prove to any American how heavily tainted our system is , and how much the Press can scew the op-polls to get your attention, or change views by reporting trivial issues.
We all keep saying "lets hear about the real issues" and i hear reports of speaches from Obama, and town hall Stump speaches from McCain followed by a "press" conference.But you all ask the same dumb questions, and nobody pushes the issue when they avoid answering.Grow some balls, find that independant neutral reporting view point, and give us some eal News, not just all this 'Opinion" crap
Posted by: mullett | September 2, 2008 2:57 AM | Report abuse
I dont know where you idiots get your numbers. Palin is seen as 53% favorable to Biden @ 48% favorable. Oh an Biden great idea was to break Iraq into three countries so every year we go through terror and bomb threats like when the allies carved up Isreal and Palastine. More hostility in the Middle East. Sounds like great foriegn Policy.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 2:54 AM | Report abuse
If the conservatives support Bristol then they must be supporting all teenage mothers and brides all over the world. I guess Talibans and Republicans have one more thing in common besides their love for gun.
Posted by: Jack | September 2, 2008 2:54 AM | Report abuse
Wow. I would have said "Yawn, who cares?" to this whole Palin's daughter is pregnant "story." But now the libs are setting the stage for a monumental backlash. By all means, pile on the candidate's daughter some more. You guys just don't know when to quit do you?
Posted by: Tom | September 2, 2008 2:52 AM | Report abuse
Conservatives who are rallying behind Bristol should answer one question. Do you support pre marital sex or not? Please answer it loudly so we can know once for all what you believe in. You did not criticize McCain when he called Chelsea ugly and joked that Janet Reno was her father. Conservatives all over the world love lieing, cheating, and when it comes to sex they will have it with anyone. I wonder if McCain is sleeping with Sarah Palin. Otherwise why will a 72 year old man select a younger, prettier woman who has no experience. I guess Kay Bailey Hutchison was an old hag for McCain. He has young wife and now wants to have young VP.
Posted by: Rif | September 2, 2008 2:49 AM | Report abuse
If McCain decesion was so bad how come he raised more money in the last two days than any other time on his campaign?
Posted by: Joe Locke | September 2, 2008 2:46 AM | Report abuse
How can everyone be up an arms about Palin experience when she has more experience than the Community Organizer aka Obama. 1 term senator with no foriegn experience who just votes present instead of making an executive decesion. She has ran the 32nd biggest budget in the country with a surplus, has the best knowledge of Energy in the country which helps the economy and gas prices. Ran the biggest land mass in America. Took on corruption in the Government and all Obama does is lie. His DNC speech sounded like Republican policies: Cut taxes, drill for oil and invest in renawable energy. Send Troops to Georgia and Afghanstan. All issues he has voted no to. He is just all lies with no experience and the biggest Affirmative Action job canidate in history. Name any White person that would be consider for president after 1 year in senate and 2 campaigning. You will not even consider a White women for VP with 2 Years Executive Experience. Wake up People OBAMA has no foreign Policy experience.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 2:44 AM | Report abuse
I'm not sure whether this is a willful myopia on the part of conservatives or whether they truly don't see the issue here, but here goes (forgive me for trying to insert a bit of logical thinking into this discussion):
1) Palin is a vocal opponent of teaching sexual education in public schools and instead offers teaching abstinence. The argument against this has always been that not giving teens information puts them at risk of making bad choices. The conservative argument against has been that it encourages "immoral behavior". Her daughter's current unfortunate situation (I'm assuming it's unfortunate and not planned) practically shouts that teaching abstinence doesn't work. Given that teaching reproductive issues in our public schools are a valid political issue, this means that like it or not, Palin's daughter's teenage pregnancy is a valid campaign issue in that it implies that simply teaching abstinence doesn't work.
2) If this pregnancy was known prior to her selection, it calls McCain's judgement into question. He had to realize that her lack of experience would already be a major issue. Adding to that a potential hot button issue like a teen pregnancy, it raises the issue of McCain's desire to be viewed as a maverick overriding solid decision-making based on all the available facts. This is a valid campaign issue because as President McCain will - presumably - be making many decisions which will have huge, literally world-affecting repercussions.
3) Palin has campaigned in the past as a hardcore "Family Values" candidate. That label is so cliched as to be almost meaningless at this point, but as a Social Conservative, she presumably advocates a traditional family unit where the mother and father are fully engaged in their children's lives. Given that she also advocates against premarital sex, one can only assume that she was unsuccessful in instilling her virtues into her own daughter. This makes it unlikely in the extreme that she will be able to instill those values in anyone else's children, and thus any attempt to bring Social Conservatism into the public sphere - an attempt which is presumably the reason why she is so attractive to the Republican Social Conservatives - seems clearly destined to fail, and to waste public money and time. Again, this makes it a valid campaign issue.
One last point - I'm almost embarrassed to have to point this out, but please note that nowhere in all this did I draw any specific attention to the fact that Palin is a woman. I feel that every single argument I make here would apply equally to a male candidate who held the same values.
Sorry this post is so long, but it's time for a little light and less heat, and you can't achieve that with pithy one-liners.
Posted by: Dogzilla | September 2, 2008 2:04 AM | Report abuse
Interesting how quickly the Palin campaign announced that the daughter would be marrying the putative father.....is the official campaign song "Shotgun"?
Posted by: Anonymousagain | September 2, 2008 1:59 AM | Report abuse
99.5% doesn't mean 1 out of every 200 people will get pregnant. It means every time someone has sex there is a 1 in 200 chance of conception. So it is very small. For Anthony a few comments back.
Posted by: James | September 2, 2008 1:47 AM | Report abuse
I think the daughter's pregnancy is a personal matter, and completely has nothing to do with the larger problem: Palin has no business being in the position to possibly lead this country. Maybe in 15 or 20 years she might be the one for the job, but only 18 months ago (right around the time McCain and Obama started the campaigning process)...she was a Mayor of a rural town. Her resume, prior to becoming Governer for 1.5 years, reads more like someone who is applying to be a school principal - not a potential leader of the most powerful country in the world...that's in the middle of some bleak times right now.
I've always said that I prefer Obama, but wouldn't be too upset if McCain won. But his judgment in this makes me wonder if he is getting too old and out of touch with why I liked him to begin with.
Not knowing the person you are putting in line to run the U.S. is not putting "country first."
Posted by: JC | September 2, 2008 1:31 AM | Report abuse
Thats what you get when you pick somebody nobody knows about.. We are going to dig and meet you... thats if you like it or not.. that is one of those down sides to being in the spotlight... cake and eat it too?... dont think so
Posted by: opps | September 2, 2008 1:29 AM | Report abuse
Assume for the sake of argument that all pro-Palin comments are from conservatives and all anti-Palin comments are from liberals. Look over the comments carefully.
Do you notice that almost all of the really nasty comments "german shepards" "traglodytes" etc. are from the left? Same is true for all the hysterical "world is coming to an end" comments and the conspiracy theories "Sarah's child". Finally overrepresented in the left's side are comments that are almost surely made-up like "I was sure I was going to vote for Mc Cain and then he selected Palin and it made me vomit and now I will vote for Obama".
If you are on the fence you might want to join us conservatives who are generally nicer and think things out more thoroughly.
Posted by: cezind | September 2, 2008 1:20 AM | Report abuse
"The Point is Ray, that the Religious Right are A. Who are the most happy with Palin B. Are a serious threat to democracy and personal lives and personal choices and family values of a diverse nation."
The case presented was that there was some dicotomy where the Clintons were moral and yet certain Republicans weren't, yet the Clintons were somehow unfairly represented. The problem is, Democrats spent most of the Clinton administration lecturing us on how a man's private life was just that, and his personal morality didn't effect his ability to govern, despite all protestations from the "religious right". Now suddenly, Democrats want to embrace family values and be moral arbiters because it's politically expedient. Well, it doesn't work that way. You can't selectively unring the bell. If private morality didn't matter for Clinton, then it doesn't matter for McCain or Palin. If it did, then you spent 8 years helping a immoral man gain and keep power, and therefore no standing to pass judgement on the morality of the other side's guy.
As to the "religious right", last time I checked the religious right was supportive of the effort that has given representative democracy to tens of millions of Afghans and Iraqis. An effort that as recently as last year the two people at the top of the Democratic ticket were prepared to abanbon to potential genocide or partition of their country. People in the former Soviet empire have self determination due to the efforts of the religious right and the candidates that they supported. Liberals talk a good game but when push comes to shove they'll leave you in chains. Always prepared to fight the good fight against soft targets like Southern Baptists, but ask them to take on someone that might actually blow them up and it's time to "have a dialog" or "reach a compromise". Last I checked the religious right wasn't for campus speech codes and the onerous limitations to personal freedom of political correctness. Last I checked the religious right was in favor of defending all parts of the constitution, unlike the ACLU and Democrats as a party, that conveniently ignore the parts that make urbanites uncomfortable. Now, if by "democracy and personal lives and personal choices and family values" you mean actually mean "gay marriage, abortion on demand, and mandated public school indoctrination" yeah, they're a danger to that. But such are not the most pressing issues of our age, despite the prevailing wisdom of the Upper West Side barristas. And this is why, more and more, people are contemptuous of the Democratic party, because instead of being a party of the people, it's become the shrill organ of a bunch of liberal elitists who share no common values with most of the electorate. That you couldn't beat the weakess incumbent President of our lifetime in the midst of an unpopular war should be a clue.
Posted by: Ray | September 2, 2008 12:57 AM | Report abuse
Sarah Palin is an egotistical, overly ambitious politician who says she puts family values first, but is an obvious hypocrite. And whats with John McCain nominating someone he doesn't even know to be a "heart beat away". What a freak show Republican ticket. "The old Paw Paw Dude and the runner up to miz alaska".
Posted by: Susan Jones | September 2, 2008 12:57 AM | Report abuse
The neo-cons, conservatives, and evangelicals just don't mix. The neo-cons have ruined our country and reputation. The evangelicals have shown themselves to be hypocrites. Let's face if God can't stop free will, then you certainly can't stop it through legislation. And the poor conservatives gave up all their core values to gain power.
This story is revealing on so many different levels. I hope the true conservatives make a come back because at least you care about the Constitution.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 12:52 AM | Report abuse
Palin is a joke.
If somehow she wins the election, the USA is finished.
We can't compete in the global economy with such lightweight "leaders."
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 2, 2008 12:50 AM | Report abuse
I think it is humorous that the only people expressing offence at the daughter's pregnancy are the same leftists who typically have the least interest in traditional virtues.
The 10% or 15% of the electorate whose political ideology does not make the McCain/Obama choice obvious will likely measure this by how well Ms. Palin and her family handle the situation.
Based on what I have seen and read of her so far I think they will be impressed.
The left at this point would love to have Ms. Palin excuse herself from the race. That is a 60's Haight-Ashbury drug induced pipedream on their part.
Posted by: Cezind | September 2, 2008 12:44 AM | Report abuse
It's all over the blogosphere: Bristol was made pregnant by the family German shepherd.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 12:40 AM | Report abuse
Hey, Sarah Palin, once you explain to your kids how babies are made, you may want to take a look at this:
"The generally accepted age for the Earth and the rest of the solar system is about 4.55 billion years (plus or minus about 1%). This value is derived from several different lines of evidence.
Unfortunately, the age cannot be computed directly from material that is solely from the Earth. There is evidence that energy from the Earth's accumulation caused the surface to be molten. Further, the processes of erosion and crustal recycling have apparently destroyed all of the earliest surface.
The oldest rocks which have been found so far (on the Earth) date to about 3.8 to 3.9 billion years ago (by several radiometric dating methods). Some of these rocks are sedimentary, and include minerals which are themselves as old as 4.1 to 4.2 billion years. Rocks of this age are relatively rare, however rocks that are at least 3.5 billion years in age have been found on North America, Greenland, Australia, Africa, and Asia.
While these values do not compute an age for the Earth, they do establish a lower limit (the Earth must be at least as old as any formation on it). This lower limit is at least concordant with the independently derived figure of 4.55 billion years for the Earth's actual age."
Once you assimilate those facts, maybe you'd be qualified to be a teacher's aide.
Once you've mastered that, let's talk about VP of the USA.
OK? Does that sound fair?
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 2, 2008 12:38 AM | Report abuse
If one of Gore's daughters would've been pregnant during the '92 election, Rush Limbaugh would've been as mean to her as he was to Chelsea Clinton (Remember the "White House Dog" comment?).
"Family Values" Republicans have no qualms about attacking Democratic women and children, based on clothing, appearance, voice, or any number of trivial things.
But if Democrats use Bristol Palin to call attention to the fact that abstinence-only education DOESN'T work, and that REAL sex education including birth control is the only way to prevent teen pregnancy, well, then Democrats are just AWFUL.
Republicans are whining hypocrites who will spread any manner of foul lies if it's to their political advantage, but will wail and shed false tears when the shoe's on the other foot.
I've had enough of two-faced Republicans! You'd all be first in line to bad-mouth Bristol if her mom had a "D" by her name, and don't insult us by pretending otherwise! None of you care about her as a human being, only as a reason to fake outrage to score points in a political game!
Posted by: Tudlow | September 2, 2008 12:38 AM | Report abuse
If Palin became president (something we must consider) American would be in deep s#*t.
Posted by: Mark Baron | September 2, 2008 12:34 AM | Report abuse
I want someone with the experience to command in office. I want someone who can easily tell me the five most important significant government decisions they have made, whey they made them, and the impact those decisions had on others. I want someone who tells the truth. ... hmmm I guess that means No to Obama and Biden.
Posted by: I.C. DeadPeople | September 2, 2008 12:34 AM | Report abuse
Low-I.Q. John Sidney McCain III's selection of troglodyte Palin as VP marks the official start of the decline and fall of America.
With politics of such low quality, we can't survive in a global economy.
Ciao, USA! It was good knowing you when you were at your best. I'll miss you.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 12:29 AM | Report abuse
Glen:
Palin thinks the Earth is a mere 5,000 years old.
She's several centuries behind the curve.
Palin is not presidential material, not by a long, long shot.
You call that judgement "elitism"; I call it national self-preservation.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 2, 2008 12:26 AM | Report abuse
I think that Sarah Palin's daughter and the young man doing the right thing speaks to the character of her family and community.
I think the efforts to disgrace the Palin family are typical of the post-Bork mentality of the left which is to win at any cost.
Posted by: Cezind | September 2, 2008 12:24 AM | Report abuse
More disturbing is the fact that Palin and her husband were both members of the Alaskan Independence Party.
Ms. Palin, when were you first really proud to be an American? Presumably, after you left a party calling for a vote for Alaska to leave the USA.
Posted by: J | September 2, 2008 12:24 AM | Report abuse
Typical elitist slam on Rural America:
"...troglodyte Palin as VP marks the official start of the decline and fall of America."
Posted by: Glen | September 2, 2008 12:18 AM | Report abuse
Sorry to hear that any young Lady is Pregnant at a young age. The Question I have is the young Man being forced in to marry her? Who is he? How old is he? How about his Family are they being told to keep quiet about it? Is he ready to take care of his new Family? Can he be financial reasonable? Are we going to hear in 4 to 8 year that they got Divorce because they married to young? A word to the Mom’s and Dad’s do not force them if it to be it will be. Moreover, let us not make this into a Political decision just for Political purpose. Live with it! Do not make it worst for the young Lady and Young Man Back off both sides OK! We not need your Spin on it Bill O’Reilly and the rest of the so-called News Jerks. I will or will not Vote for John McCain because a 17yr is Pregnant. There are real problems that need to talked about!
Posted by: Old Uncle Sam Misguided Child /Trucker | September 2, 2008 12:17 AM | Report abuse
The McCain handlers (actually, mishandlers; i.e., complete waste of McCain Campaign funds) are too transparent. Mark the following coming up as Gustav subsides:
The surprise announcements made today, and before are the exit strategy for Gov. Palin to refocus on her immediate priorities and the position of elevated pride, of course as God has wished. Then the Alaskans will have to deal with their business, the bridge, the moose's, and the whole wide natural beauty there. There will be a time for return, even the Jedi had years ago.
Ask not anything about the Palins, but ask what the next VP choice be the right one at a right time in these turbulent times that America faces. D not forget to add: The democrats lie and are not to be believed.
A recommendation to RNC: Just pick some one else, other than McCain altogether and rejuvenate your party and help the base, though it sounds so baseless.
Posted by: O.P. Neon | September 2, 2008 12:17 AM | Report abuse
What about the fact that they hid the pregnancy on television. Why didn't she just come out without a blanket and a baby covering her up. Whey put this child in this situation...GOP will do anything to win. I could care less about her private affairs with her family, however, I do care about liars in the White House. I still believe that this story is a cover up for something else. This woman has issues.... Time will tell.
Posted by: Tinya | September 2, 2008 12:07 AM | Report abuse
Low-I.Q. John Sidney McCain III's selection of troglodyte Palin as VP marks the official start of the decline and fall of America.
With politics of such low quality, we can't survive in a global economy.
Ciao, USA! It was good knowing you when you were at your best. I'll miss you.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 2, 2008 12:02 AM | Report abuse
As a staunch republican, I am highly dissapointed with McCains choice for VP. Palin is not ready for this position and as a person who is big on family values, I think Palin has ridiculed the GOP. My vote was for McCain before, but now I know that I WONT be voting for him.
Posted by: Dissappointed | September 2, 2008 12:01 AM | Report abuse
"My children live more than 500 miles from their grandparents - does that make me a bad parent?"
Yes. You seem to be a bad person generally.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 11:57 PM | Report abuse
Cynicism101,
Are you running for Vice President of the US, the most powerful country in the world? No. My point is that why would you want to run for VP when you have so much going on at home and why would you thrust your family into the spotlight like that when you have personal issues going on. I think accepting the nomination was just a dumb greedy move for Palin to satisfy her own ambition. A noble woman would go where her family needs her. I'm not saying be a domesticated housewife, but rather make time-appropriate decisions. Bristol is 17 and obviously isn't primely poised to be a mother, so she is going to need motherly guidance. Maybe in 4 years Palin would be ready to run, but now I think her family needs her.
Posted by: Kaleigh | September 1, 2008 11:55 PM | Report abuse
jb:
I believe the whole point of the VP is to have a replacement for the president ready should he drop dead.
I believe McCain himself stated that he would pick someone ready to lead in an instant.
Palin's Downs Syndrome Baby and pregnant teenage daughter make it highly unlikely she could fill in at a Summit with Putin or Hu or Calderon or Sarkozy.
Her third-rate college degree makes it more unlikely still.
As a choice for VP, Palin is indefensible.
McCain is playing games with our government and country, and we citizens should resent the he ll out of him for it.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 11:54 PM | Report abuse
Republicans would rather elect someone they'd like to have a beer with for president. They glorify mediocrity and averageness as something to be celebrated. That's how we got arrogant clowns like George Bush and (bottom of his naval academy class) John McCain, now we get the Alaska hillbillies.
This is just the first of the Harriet Myers types we'll see from a McCain administration.
Heckuva job GOP.
Posted by: Marie Lawrence | September 1, 2008 11:53 PM | Report abuse
Bristol may not really be pregnant.
The McCain camp could be lying as a way to try and explain Bristol's post pregnancy weight.
The baby may still be Sarah Palin's.
Posted by: dc | September 1, 2008 11:49 PM | Report abuse
Kaleigh,
Yes, Sarah and Todd Palin have 5 children - one of which is an adult, already left the house, and is serving in the US Army about to be deployed to the CENTCOM theater (that covers Iraq and Afghanistan).
Her oldest daughter is 17 as you state, and now pregnant and allegedly planning a marriage to the father. Further, for all I know (I've found no records of birthdate) Bristol may turn 18 before the birth?
At this point, who knows if Bristol intends to take residence at USNO. Sure, if she does not, the grandchild will have some physical separation from the grand parents. Do you honestly think this is the first time that's happened? My children live more than 500 miles from their grandparents - does that make me a bad parent?
Posted by: Cynicism101 | September 1, 2008 11:45 PM | Report abuse
--"NoOneImportant - Do you think contraceptives are 100% foolproof?
Posted by: Anthony | September 1, 2008 10:33 PM"--
No somewhere in the 99.5% range.
http://www.fda.gov/Fdac/features/1997/conceptbl.html
Posted by: NoOneImportant | September 1, 2008 11:27 PM
--------------------------------
So there is 1 in 200 chance that everytime teens have sex, it may end in pregnancy. But the problem really becomes when in the heat of the moment, they go through it even though they do not have a condom to use.
Posted by: Anthony | September 1, 2008 11:41 PM | Report abuse
Dear Willy,
How can you actually begin a comment with "Only in the past few decades.." and think you are saying anything intelligent. Are you aware that a decade is 10 years???
and why is it that all of you McCrazies never stick to the actual topic without attacking Hilory, Clinton, Obama or any other democrat that has ever excisted?
IT IS REALLY QUIT BIZARRE!
Posted by: dc | September 1, 2008 11:39 PM | Report abuse
Also think it is predictable that - as noted above #8226, #8227 - is spelling out the predicament that the Republicans brought on themselves with this candidate is yet again, a landmine for Democrats... Careful, not to "get personal" careful not to offend women, careful not to offend. Even when Obama wisely has too much class and integrity, some of the ilk of the Religious Right spit out propaganda that he is antichrist or better yet... The antichrist, Muslim terrorist, marxist, etc. -- But careful, democrats... "Social Conservatives" back Palin. (Social Conservatives is code for the powerful Religious Right)
Posted by: Kathy | September 1, 2008 11:38 PM | Report abuse
Willy, you're a cowardly PoS.
If you can't carry on a substantive discussion, even when you yourself have called for one, you should stay off these boards.
I can't stand mor ons like you.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 11:37 PM | Report abuse
Let's see if I have this right...her daughter is mature enough for marriage, but not mature enough to learn about reproductive health.
Posted by: Pro-Education | September 1, 2008 11:37 PM | Report abuse
In response to MB:
First off, I wish I could spank you for your smart A$$ comment, but in blog land, I can't do so. But, I will respond to your sarcasm:
For now, she can't be commander in chief, Mccain is living and as much as people think he is going to die due to being old, they aren't God or the Grim Reaper. If elected Mccain will do everything possible to stay alive to enjoy his darn term in office.
With your comment on Sarah Palin being a Commander-in-Chief. Let's say Mc cain was elected president (this is a scenario here) The time spent under McCain, she would be dealing with the day to day operations and learning the ropes to become the future Commander in Chief. Nonetheless, she has valuable executive decision making skills on top of understanding protocol due to her experience of being a governor in Alaska. With that said, if she goes through the experience of being a Vice President especially for 2 terms, performs well, she has the experience in my eyes. Now, I know someone is going to make a comment on Mccains life span.... i'm only speaking in scenario to answer Mr. Smarty Pants Blaine.
If you want the truth, I would rather have a woman like Hillary Clinton as VP in the White House vs. Sarah Palin. But, her being forthright about this issue of Bristol vs. hiding it shows character in a leader. With the Bristol issue, if the liberals want to keep dumping on her.... its going to arouse sympathy especially with women voters that aren't too hard line with the pro choice movement and American mothers.
Posted by: jb | September 1, 2008 11:36 PM | Report abuse
Anne,
What's wrong with a mother being proud of a daughter for making a decision she believes in?
Do you expect and/or force your child to act/behave/decide exactly as you ... or are you proud when they come to the "correct" choice based on their own thought process?
Yes, Sarah Palin believes there is no decision - but as you know in a freely democratic society - there IS A DECISION for Bristol to make.
To the point of prenatal testing - those tests help with much more than just the ole reset button. My wife and I wanted to understand pre-delivery so that we could research and prepare for the necessary care. Sure, even when the tests are negative there is always a chance, but we found nothing wrong with having more information.
I know some are against determining the gender prior to birth - that's their choice to make, just as any other prenatal test would be.
Posted by: Cynicism101 | September 1, 2008 11:35 PM | Report abuse
It is a bad decision for Sarah Palin to accept the nomination for VP when she has so much going on at home. Despite what it all means politically, as a mother she needs to her family. She has 5 kids, which is a handful in todays world, let alone doing it as the VP of the most powerful nation in the world. On top of that her youngest child has down syndrome and her 17 year old will be bringing another little one into the picture soon. That means 6 kids in a household, one with special attention. I think as a mother she should step down and give her family her full support right now because it is evident that is where her attention is needed. If she can't make the decision to give her full attention to her family then how will she make appropriate decisions for a country?
Posted by: Kaleigh | September 1, 2008 11:34 PM | Report abuse
Michael, I made no comment on your "abstract". Again, you speak with forked tongue.
But I will comment now. Your ability to copy and paste is not in question here. Your vile and ignorant comments are.
Have a good night and NAMASTE'
Posted by: Willy | September 1, 2008 11:34 PM | Report abuse
Some wonderful pics of beautiful baby trig and his mama, hate on dems just admit it this woman is going to take the white house not sleazy hillary.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 11:31 PM | Report abuse
Speaking as an independent woman, I think this just shows terrible judgement on McCain's part.
Palin doesn't seem to have much to recommend her except being a woman and a social conservative.
It's a terribly cynical and misguided move and while I'm still making up my mind about Obama, I've now made up my mind about McCain. No!
Posted by: Yve | September 1, 2008 11:22 PM
****
Yea righ Yve, LOL. Why is it that people have to lie when they post. If you have to start off explaining who you are then most likely you are not who you say you are. Nice try though but no one is buying it Yve. Change your name and try again. This time come back as a right wing nut job that has had it with republicans and will now vote for the most liberal dem in the senate. That one will work even better.
Posted by: kabookey | September 1, 2008 11:31 PM | Report abuse
It never ceases to amaze me that liberals (who demand that we - the rest of us mere mortals - be compassionate, understanding and tolerant) wind up being far more bigoted, racist and intolerant than conservatives. It must be the messiah complex they all enjoy projecting.
Posted by: FOXBOROUGH | September 1, 2008 11:31 PM | Report abuse
Imagine the strange experience or feelings that McCain may be dealing with right now.
There are speeches to be written/read, rewritten/re-read, trying to feel proud about Palin pick (but not when others pick on her), telling the nation "this is exactly what you need", and perhaps looking for a way to reaffirm such confidence, his buddies [Lieberman, the least and many others] possibly poking on on and on - "why not me?" and then Mr. Opportunism getting blinded stiff in the middle of all opportunities. Hey, Surge should have a purpose, and the performance to be measured against those goals. It cannot be generalized - surge is working.
This poor fellow can't even get upset for days or weeks on the folks who shoved him towards this pick. Unlike the damage by a hurricane, this mess will take along time to assess the perpetuating damage due to their futile damage control. This i snot a republic or democratic issue. It is all about judgment. We absolutely do not need a president to make horrific crisis out of peaceful time. John McCain unwittingly gives a new identity of "Jack in the box". Hey, his campaign could raise lots of money by marketing one of these devices. Thank God the mess is uncovering before the election, and perhaps before the sanctioning of the VP candidate.
Ever since the "Mission Accomplished" sign with Bush on the aircraft carrier, GW is getting break from getting total focus as laughable personality.
Posted by: O. P. Neon | September 1, 2008 11:31 PM | Report abuse
Chris Cillizza: to answer the pseudo-question about the political impact of Bristol Palin's pregnancy: it is clear that Democrats hate children. Of course, the sample of comments left on this article may not be an accurate assessment of all Democrats (+/- 3%).
Posted by: Stephen | September 1, 2008 11:31 PM | Report abuse
Someone actually made this comment below: "Bill and Hillary stayed married for political reasons. They have no real connection between themselves; they are pure political animals."
So how do you know this? Really? Fact is there are men and women )mostly men, who have for years had affairs and the husband and wife are deeply connected and love each other. That is the way it has always been. I don't condone this but people make their own decisions to stay with someone when this is the case. One of my grandfathers did this - a very wealthy man - and it cause a lot of pain, but he still dearly loved my grandma and she him. Finally he just got too old or caught too many times and quit running around.
Did you see Bill and Hillary at the Dem convention last week? It was easy to see that they love and respect each other very much. Maybe Bill's roaming days are finally over. He's lucky that Hillary loved him enough to keep him.
Posted by: Sue | September 1, 2008 11:30 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "Also, I don't think that your employer, no matter who you are, gets to have a say how, where, and when you have sex.
But that's just because I believe in freedom."
That's freedom. Hilarious. Try having sex in your employers office, or anywhere in public, for that matter. There are laws. Your freedom doesn't include that, and I am no prude.
Posted by: Willy | September 1, 2008 11:30 PM | Report abuse
--"NoOneImportant - Do you think contraceptives are 100% foolproof?
Posted by: Anthony | September 1, 2008 10:33 PM"--
No somewhere in the 99.5% range.
Posted by: NoOneImportant | September 1, 2008 11:27 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "BOTTOM LINE FOLKS, MCCAIN SELECTED A VP HE ONLY MET ONCE. I INTERVIEW ASSISTANT LEVEL CANIDATES FOR OPEN POSITIONS NO LESS THEN 2-3 TIMES BEFORE MAKING A DECISION. HOW DO YOU CLAIM TO BE ABOUT COUNTRY FIRST AND HIRE SOMEONE AFTER MEETING THEM ONCE??? HOW DO YOU ACCUSE OBAMA OF PREFERRING TO LOSE THE WAR AND WIN AN ELECTION, AND THEN YOU SELECT SOMEONE YOU ONLY MET ONCE TO BE SECOND IN LINE FOR THE PRESIDENCY TO WIN THE CONSERVATIVE AND WOMEN VOTE???
All caps again?? Only in the past few decades has a presidential candidate met their VP. Several didn't even like them after they met them. As Cactus Jack Garner, FDR's VP for two terms, said: "the vice-presidency ain't worth a bucket of warm spit". Truman didn't even know there was such a thing as the atomic bomb when he took office. And he did alright.
Say what you mean, you are a lib, and don't like Palin. Then take a look at Hillary, and froth at the mouth. Hilarious.
Posted by: Willy | September 1, 2008 11:27 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "You never got a blow job?
Wow. That's sad."
Not in the oval office of the taxpayers house. To think that's okay is sad. Did your taxes pay the cleaning bill on Monica's dress??
- Willy
-------
If our taxes had paid the cleaning bill we would have never heard of her, dummy!
Also, I don't think that your employer, no matter who you are, gets to have a say how, where, and when you have sex.
But that's just because I believe in freedom.
Posted by: Yve | September 1, 2008 11:26 PM | Report abuse
I would have rather heard that Bristol would continue with her education this year and attend college in the future rather than she is getting married. that part about "keeping the baby" and marriage was certainly politically motivated. also, having babies out of wedlock rather than having an abortion is done all the time - by democrats and republicans alike, conservatives and liberals. Being pro-choice means you can also exercise your choice to have your child. and guess what? not one conservative policy ever helped me pay for my education or obtain a decent job with health benefits after i made the decision to have my child as a 17 y.o. conservatives don't want you to have an abortion, but they also don't want to help you once you have the child.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 11:26 PM | Report abuse
Willy:
I said that Republicans are anti-intellectual.
You asked for evidence.
I presented an academic paper that makes my case.
You responded by calling my comments "stupid."
Are you trying to make my point for me?
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 11:25 PM | Report abuse
Speaking as an independent woman, I think this just shows terrible judgement on McCain's part.
Palin doesn't seem to have much to recommend her except being a woman and a social conservative.
It's a terribly cynical and misguided move and while I'm still making up my mind about Obama, I've now made up my mind about McCain. No!
Posted by: Yve | September 1, 2008 11:22 PM | Report abuse
To Ray's post citing Democrats' immorality evidenced by Bill Clinton's sexual escapade, for which Hillary forgave him. McCain committed adultery and put away his first wife, who lost her good looks in a car accident. Gee that was productive mud-slinging. The Point is Ray, that the Religious Right are A. Who are the most happy with Palin B. Are a serious threat to democracy and personal lives and personal choices and family values of a diverse nation.
Posted by: Kathy | September 1, 2008 11:22 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "You never got a blow job?
Wow. That's sad."
Not in the oval office of the taxpayers house. To think that's okay is sad. Did your taxes pay the cleaning bill on Monica's dress??
Posted by: Willy | September 1, 2008 11:20 PM | Report abuse
Kabooky and Willy,
You clearly missed my point. Why is a pro-life family suggesting a difficulty in the "decisions" that they made to go foreward with pregnancy? And ultimately congratulating themselves for what I said was the right decision. For them, there supposedly is no decision -- period. That's my point. My other point is that Palin herself had an elective test done for birthdefects for, arguably, decision making purposes.
P.S. For the record, I had my second child at 37, and elected against elective prenatal tests for birthdefects.
Posted by: Anne | September 1, 2008 11:19 PM | Report abuse
BOTTOM LINE FOLKS, MCCAIN SELECTED A VP HE ONLY MET ONCE. I INTERVIEW ASSISTANT LEVEL CANIDATES FOR OPEN POSITIONS NO LESS THEN 2-3 TIMES BEFORE MAKING A DECISION. HOW DO YOU CLAIM TO BE ABOUT COUNTRY FIRST AND HIRE SOMEONE AFTER MEETING THEM ONCE??? HOW DO YOU ACCUSE OBAMA OF PREFERRING TO LOSE THE WAR AND WIN AN ELECTION, AND THEN YOU SELECT SOMEONE YOU ONLY MET ONCE TO BE SECOND IN LINE FOR THE PRESIDENCY TO WIN THE CONSERVATIVE AND WOMEN VOTE???
Posted by: dc | September 1, 2008 11:19 PM | Report abuse
Michael, you ability to copy and paste is not in question here. Your quirky theories and vile and stupid comments are.
Posted by: Willy | September 1, 2008 11:16 PM | Report abuse
Willy: Let me know if you need help understanding the abstract below:
"Due to the amplified importance of forging an intimate connection with the American public, modern presidents must adjust their political personalities and leadership. To combat allegations of elitism, recent Republican presidents have adopted anti-intellectualism as a conservative form of populism. Anti-intellectualism is defined as disparagement of the complexity associated with intellectual pursuits, and a rejection of the elitism and self-aware attitude of distinction that is commonly associated with intellectual life."
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 11:16 PM | Report abuse
Hey, Cynicism101:
The WaPo should remove all your opinions for being untenable.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 11:14 PM | Report abuse
It all boils down to this. If you are voting for the person, instead of the accomplishments, the platform and what is best for the USA, then you are more stupid than I thought. And most of you libs are pretty stupid.
BTW, if you are not that stupid, then you will be voting for a third party this time around. The Libertarian party, for instance.
Read their platform. Keep the government out of my business. Oh, I forget, without the government help, most of you Libs couldn't function.
Posted by: Willy | September 1, 2008 11:13 PM | Report abuse
Willy: Let me know if you need help understanding the abstract below:
"Due to the amplified importance of forging an intimate connection with the American public, modern presidents must adjust their political personalities and leadership. To combat allegations of elitism, recent Republican presidents have adopted anti-intellectualism as a conservative form of populism. Anti-intellectualism is defined as disparagement of the complexity associated with intellectual pursuits, and a rejection of the elitism and self-aware attitude of distinction that is commonly associated with intellectual life."
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 11:12 PM | Report abuse
We should be concerned about a 17 year-old girl being forced to get married way too soon and for the wrong reason in order to appease her mother's conservative base.
Posted by: Justin | September 1, 2008 11:11 PM | Report abuse
"unnatural sex acts in the Oval Office"
You right-wingers are a laugh riot!
You never got a blow job?
Wow. That's sad.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 11:10 PM | Report abuse
Washington Post -
Today is the first time I have ever visited your site - which I was directed to based on a news RSS feed. I'm afraid I've found a significant population of hateful, baseless personal attacks and slanders directed towards two US citizens, Sarah Palin and Bristol Palin.
Based on rule 1, items 2 and 4 defined in your commentary governance - I respectfully request that you investigate, and remove as appropriate, any postings on this topic from the users "Anonymous", and "Michael Blain."
Thank you.
Posted by: Cynicism101 | September 1, 2008 11:08 PM | Report abuse
BRISTOL IS NOT PREGNANT. THEY ARE LYING ABOUT BRISTOL BEING PREGNANT TO COVER UP HER POST PREGNANCY WEIGHT!!! LET'S SEE WHAT THIS ALL LOOKS LIKE IN 3 MORE MONTHS.
TRIG IS BRISTOL'S BABY.
Posted by: Madison | September 1, 2008 11:08 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "Unlike an innocent mother, like Palin, Bill Clinton was a low life who engaged in unnatural sex acts in the Oval Office."
And his wife sanctioned it, and is a proven habitual liar, and the libs still love them.
He preyed on women since his college days, his terms as governor of Arkansas, and Hillary was still there.
See how long it takes for her to file for divorce, when he didn't help her gain the presidency or the vice-presidency. Don't hold your breath, while waiting.
Posted by: Willy | September 1, 2008 11:07 PM | Report abuse
Kabookey:
I'd like to toss you and your ilk aside like yesterday's newspaper!
You're a doofus.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 11:07 PM | Report abuse
So McCain has been calling Palin his "soul mate". Everywhere they go, he's kissing and pawing at her - acting like a giddy teenager in love. They keep showing it on the news.
I think the man has taken leave of his senses.
Posted by: out of DC | September 1, 2008 11:05 PM | Report abuse
Hey, Willy, here's the abstract of a whole academic paper discussing Republicans' anti-intellectualism; put that in your pipe and smoke it!:
"Due to the amplified importance of forging an intimate connection with the American public, modern presidents must adjust their political personalities and leadership. To combat allegations of elitism, recent Republican presidents have adopted anti-intellectualism as a conservative form of populism. Anti-intellectualism is defined as disparagement of the complexity associated with intellectual pursuits, and a rejection of the elitism and self-aware attitude of distinction that is commonly associated with intellectual life."
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 11:04 PM | Report abuse
Questions:
Can someone please explain to me why Palin, a professed pro-lifer, makes a big deal about saying "We're proud of Bristol's DECISION to HAVE her baby." What DECISION? For Palin, there supposedly is NO decision in any circumstance.
While we're at it, can someone explain to me why Palin had amniocentesis done (at a time when she still had an early-term choice to abort) to detect for birthdefects. I'm told if she waited a little longer, an ultrasound -- a less intrusive and risky diagnostic -- would have given her the answer on Downs.
And, on top of that, she too is making a big deal about what a great and moral "Decision" it was for her to have that baby even though she knew she had Downs. What "decision?" I thought, according to her own public position, there was no "decision" to be made after the moment her pregnancy test showed positive
Sounds like Palin is supportive and thankful for Roe v. Wade ... she had options and could make what in the end was the right decision.
Posted by: Anne | September 1, 2008 10:56 PM
***********
I guess she is making a point on it Anne because people like you would have tossed the baby aside like yesterday's newspaper. heck Barry O would have you abort the child as many times as possible till it was dead. I guess you support that choice too? You sound like a real quality person there Anne. I am sure the family is real proud of you.
Posted by: kabookey | September 1, 2008 11:03 PM | Report abuse
This announcement could be "Sand in your Eyes", if the young lady may not be truly pregnant. Is this damage control - fighting Fire with fire, so that 5th child circumstances do not get any focus? The smart campaign runners such as Rove and his kind must be ready to prove their way in this mess. They're getting tangled in their own web. Lies have limits. Who cares about the private stuff within a family, as long as such families do not get too eager to run and influence or control the lives o fall in the USA. Alaska will have to sort out the relevance of their Gov. to their needs in the State. We certainly do not miss her in the national stage.
McCain's judgment, regardless of his absurd experience has no place in the White House.
Posted by: O.P. Neon | September 1, 2008 11:02 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "I'm told if she waited a little longer, an ultrasound -- a less intrusive and risky diagnostic -- would have given her the answer on Downs."
Anne, "You are told"? Think for yourself. From what I read, she had the test, knew the child had Downs Syndrome, and decided to have it. Of course, you would have killed the child??
Posted by: Willy | September 1, 2008 11:02 PM | Report abuse
All you Lib/dems keep whistling in the dark.
The conservatives/religious right was never going to vote for Obama. The only issue was how many would turn out. They will come in droves because of Palins child and future grandchild.
The lib/dems mostly have broken families. (please do yourself a favor and not show your ignorance by denying it.). If everyone keeps up with out of wedock births are no good, many of them may just vote for Palin to back up their family members.
The Independents, who will decide the election, see an accomplished woman with the normal everyday problems. They're not going to be happy with people being judgemental towards Palin and her family. They'll show it by voting for her even though they may not have been for the McCain ticket so far.
Proof of the above:
Unlike an innocent mother, like Palin, Bill Clinton was a low life who engaged in unnatural sex acts in the Oval Office.
The lib/dems and the Independents were happy to reelect him to office.
Posted by: True Observer | September 1, 2008 11:01 PM | Report abuse
Almost no one is mentioning the fact of the lefties smear of Sarah as " grandma" THe moral high ground has been ceded.
Posted by: beyondthepale | September 1, 2008 11:00 PM | Report abuse
Anthony raises a great point:
If Palin is so gosh darn happy that she's about to be a grandmother, and so terribly proud of Bristol, why didn't she mention the pregnancy when she was introduced to the nation on Friday?
That would have been the normal thing to do: "And this is my daughter Bristol, who is going to have a baby before Christmas!"
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 10:50 PM
--------------
LOL - Yes, she should have gone ahead and tell the world in front of her 17-year old daughter that she was pregnant. That would be throwing her under Biden's Amtrak.
Posted by: Anthony | September 1, 2008 11:00 PM | Report abuse
I'm hearing and reading that the boyfriend and father of this child is a black rapper in Alaska. His alleged myspace page has been set to private via some blogs that had people check the myspace/google cache trying to find out who the father is. I'm wondering if this is why they are hiding him until the election is over, lol. Can ya just imagine? Not only are they sending out a message that abstinence only doesn't work, but she's 17 years old and pregnant by a black rapper. Well at least there goes them not being about change. I think I will stay home on election day.
Posted by: JoAnne | September 1, 2008 11:00 PM | Report abuse
GIVE ME A BREAK AMERICA! ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF MISSING THE FOREST FOR THE TREES.
AT THE END OF IT ALL, WE ARE CONSIDERING A MOTHER OF A BABY WITH SPECIAL NEEDS AS THE SECOND IN COMMAND OF THIS COUNTRY AND NOW - SHE HAS HER OLDEST CHILD WITH SPECIAL NEEDS, THE NEED OF A MOTHER TO BE BY HER SIDE DURING THIS DIFFICULT TIME.
IF SHE LOVES HER FAMILY SO MUCH AND WANTS TO BE SUCH AN EXAMPLE, SIT DOWN AND BE A MOTHER. YOUR CHILDREN NEED YOU MORE THAN AMERICA DOES
Posted by: doc | September 1, 2008 11:00 PM | Report abuse
I don't think it is unreasonable to ask three questions:
What does it say about McCain that he chose a person with so much baggage as a running mate?
What, exactly, are Gov. Palin's positions on sex education, abstinence-only programs and birth control?
Is a person's family life a reflection of their fitness to stand as a country's leader?
Posted by: bill kapra | September 1, 2008 10:41 PM
****
I think it would be fair to ask those same questions of anyone supporting Barry O as well. We all know he has his own baggage of his own making and that is while he was an adult. Has anyone asked him when was the last time he shot up? He said he did some blow and felt the needle. You really want to go down that path?
Posted by: kabookey | September 1, 2008 10:59 PM | Report abuse
Willy:
I'm not a Democrat, but I can tell you Hillary Clinton was appealing to the under-educated, not making them her VP choice!
See the difference?
And Republicans do devalue education. They always denigrate intellectuals, artists, writers -- anyone who can use their brain creatively and independently.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 10:59 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "See the difference?
And Republicans do devalue education. They always denigrate intellectuals, artists, writers -- anyone who can use their brain creatively and independently..."
No, that wasn't the point,as you well know. And I'm going to ask for proof and case by case on your statement. What, no proof?? Typical!
Posted by: Willy | September 1, 2008 10:59 PM | Report abuse
Questions:
Can someone please explain to me why Palin, a professed pro-lifer, makes a big deal about saying "We're proud of Bristol's DECISION to HAVE her baby." What DECISION? For Palin, there supposedly is NO decision in any circumstance.
While we're at it, can someone explain to me why Palin had amniocentesis done (at a time when she still had an early-term choice to abort) to detect for birthdefects. I'm told if she waited a little longer, an ultrasound -- a less intrusive and risky diagnostic -- would have given her the answer on Downs.
And, on top of that, she too is making a big deal about what a great and moral "Decision" it was for her to have that baby even though she knew she had Downs. What "decision?" I thought, according to her own public position, there was no "decision" to be made after the moment her pregnancy test showed positive
Sounds like Palin is supportive and thankful for Roe v. Wade ... she had options and could make what in the end was the right decision.
Posted by: Anne | September 1, 2008 10:56 PM | Report abuse
I am surprised that no one has pointed out yet that the McCain camp may be lying about Bristol being currently pregnant as a way to explain her post pregnancy weight and fuller chest. It will be interesting to see if she actually carries full term, or will it come about that she "loses the baby". This to me would prove that Trig is Bristols baby.
In lying and saying that Bristol is now pregnant, the hope would also be that people will think, how could Trig be Bristol's baby if she is currently pregnant?
I am not 100% convinced yet that Trig is Sarah Palins baby!
Posted by: dcbanks | September 1, 2008 10:56 PM | Report abuse
Anthony raises a great point:
If Palin is so gosh darn happy that she's about to be a grandmother, and so terribly proud of Bristol, why didn't she mention the pregnancy when she was introduced to the nation on Friday?
That would have been the normal thing to do: "And this is my daughter Bristol, who is going to have a baby before Christmas!"
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 10:50 PM
***********
Why don't you post all your family trash right here right now then since you want to know everyone else's? This has nothing to do with policy or politics but this is how pathetic our country has become that haters like the ones posting here would push this child out here like this to make an issue. I wonder how many of you ladies will be laughing tomorrow or the next or whenever were this girl to do something crazy like take here life because of all this hate being spewed her way. I hope you all take a good long look in the mirror and be real pride of your hate.
Posted by: kabookey | September 1, 2008 10:55 PM | Report abuse
Democrats are the bight losers of all time...They know they are in trouble with Palin, sop they turn hateful and vile....When will thse idiotys learn how to win a election...they blow it every time...Thank you Democrats for being such morons!! You fall into our traps every time exposing your hateful liberal Agenda's Suckers!!! LOL
Posted by: ObamaMama | September 1, 2008 10:55 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "Hey Julianne: OBAMA RELEASED HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE MONTHS AGO! Find another talking point to deflect the issue. Here is the link to his "fightthesmears" website showing his certified birth certificate from Hawaii."
Releasing his birth cerfificate means nothing. His grandmother, and several relatives say he was born in Kenya. The law is still against him:
Should Sen. Obama truly have been born in Kenya, Berg writes, the laws on the books at the time of his birth hold that U.S. citizenship may only pass to a child born overseas to a U.S. citizen parent and non-citizen parent if the former was at least 19 years of age. Sen. Obama's mother was only 18 at the time. Therefore, because U.S. citizenship could not legally be passed on to him, Obama could not be registered as a "natural born" citizen and would therefore be ineligible to seek the presidency pursuant to Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution.
Moreover, even if Sen. Obama could have somehow been deemed "natural born," that citizenship was lost in or around 1967 when he and his mother took up residency in Indonesia, where Stanley Ann Dunham married Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian citizen. Berg also states that he possesses copies of Sen. Obama's registration to Fransiskus Assisi School In Jakarta, Indonesia which clearly show that he was registered under the name "Barry Soetoro" and his citizenship listed as Indonesian."
The lawsuit is on going.
Posted by: Willy | September 1, 2008 10:53 PM | Report abuse
Willy:
I'm not a Democrat, but I can tell you Hillary Clinton was appealing to the under-educated, not making them her VP choice!
See the difference?
And Republicans do devalue education. They always denigrate intellectuals, artists, writers -- anyone who can use their brain creatively and independently.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 10:52 PM | Report abuse
The biggest hypocrites in America are the Republican "family values" crowd:
Hey little sister what have you done
Hey little sister who's the only one
Hey little sister who's your superman
Hey little sister who's the one you want
Hey little sister shot gun!
It's a nice day to start again
It's a nice day for a white wedding
It's a nice day to start again
Hey little sister what have you done
Hey little sister who's the only one
I've been away for so long (so long)
I've been away for so long (so long)
I let you go for so long
It's a nice day to start again (come on)
It's a nice day for a white wedding
It's a nice day to start again
Posted by: TheRealMcCain | September 1, 2008 10:52 PM | Report abuse
When I scrolled down to begin my comment there had been 2,214 comments. By the time I finish, who knows how many there will be?
Doesn't the fact of the number of comments, alone, answer any question as to the pending influence of this revelation? I cannot imagine that all of this traffic suggests anything positive for the McCain ticket.
I predict Sarah will be off the ticket within ten days, at the most. I expect more revelations to emerge. Perhaps, McCain will be so stubborn and/or so scared of the extreme right wing of his party that my prediction will not come about, but I feel that the odds are greater that she will bow out because "the unrelenting negativity of the media and the liberal left" has caused her to have to tend to her family to attempt to "help them regain a stable environment, especially as they prioritize the rearing of their two new additions and supporting the eldest daughter in her new marriage."
Posted by: Byron | September 1, 2008 10:51 PM | Report abuse
It's all over the Internet that while Governor mom was away in Kuwait, DC, etc., Bristol would go to all-night orgies in Juneau.
She would do DP, gang bang, all sorts of stuff.
Apparently, no one has any idea who the father might be!
Half of Alaska - and some of Canada - did this chick.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 10:38 PM
**************
Why don't you put your name to that post you piece of crap!!! I wonder what you are doing in the basement right now while no one is watching. I hope you don't have any pets around.
Posted by: kabookey | September 1, 2008 10:51 PM | Report abuse
Anthony raises a great point:
If Palin is so gosh darn happy that she's about to be a grandmother, and so terribly proud of Bristol, why didn't she mention the pregnancy when she was introduced to the nation on Friday?
That would have been the normal thing to do: "And this is my daughter Bristol, who is going to have a baby before Christmas!"
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 10:50 PM | Report abuse
Julianne: Obama has released his birth certificate months ago, and qualifies as a Presidential candidate. Here is the link.
http://my.barackobama.com/page/invite/birthcert
John McCain, on the other hand, was born in Panama, and whether he is eligible as a candidate is still in question. Here is the Wikipedia entry, complete with links. Take a look at the links.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born_citizen#US_presidential_candidates_born_outside_the_US
What Palin's daughter is doing is none of our business. Whether Palin is qualified to be President is our business, because if John McCain wins, and is disqualified, she could be President very soon.
Posted by: Pericles | September 1, 2008 10:49 PM | Report abuse
jb - you stated that "I would much rather have Sarah Palin's Family in the White house with their real life benign issues vs. a Whining Tactless Angry B#$* Michelle Obama whom is bound to offend dignitaries and their spouses. I like Obama, but can't stand his wife."
Did you ever stop to think about the fears Michelle Obama had to overcome, and the courage that she must have to stand behind her husband through this election? I would be terrified if it were me, given the way some racist people in this country think. As for Sarah Palin, well her real life issues may have to do with her inability to be a leader.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 10:49 PM | Report abuse
What a bunch of pond scum we have trolling the washington post. I bet most of these pond scum are posting from their momma's basement. Keep up the good work ladies and may you reap what you sow.
Posted by: kabookey | September 1, 2008 10:46 PM | Report abuse
What would Nelson Rockefeller and Dwight Eisenhower think of their party now?!!!!
The Republicans are a big fat joke.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 10:46 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "Republicans devalue academic achievement.
And that's fine. But they shouldn't then expect to be selected to lead the nation."
Michael, why don't you give it up?? The more you post, the more stupid that you look. You say "Republicans devalue academic achievement", while Hillary was bragging that they were her backers. The older, UNDER-EDUCATED, working class.
With every post, you dis-prove your own point.
Posted by: Willy | September 1, 2008 10:46 PM | Report abuse
Hey JB my friend, condoms break. They're not 100% effective. And to say that Bristol isn't to blame "because he should have worn a condom" is as ridiculous as saying ice doesn't melt in the heat. It takes two to have sex and make a baby.
Posted by: KB | September 1, 2008 10:45 PM | Report abuse
This business about throwing her daughter under the bus is sweet too. I guess the governor should have told all of us on Friday, while introducing her family, that the daughter holding her infant son is 5-months pregnant. That would have been more appropriate. If not for idiots spreading rumors that the governor did a Houdini concerning the birth of her son, she would not have had to make the statement. So now everyone with some sense of morality is telling the rest of us what an unfit mother she is. Incredible.
Posted by: Anthony | September 1, 2008 10:45 PM | Report abuse
Hey Julianne: OBAMA RELEASED HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE MONTHS AGO! Find another talking point to deflect the issue. Here is the link to his "fightthesmears" website showing his certified birth certificate from Hawaii.
http://my.barackobama.com/page/invite/birthcert
Obama is eligible as a presidential candidate. Now, whether John McCain is eligible or not is still an open question, because he was born in Panama. It's LIKELY that he qualifies, but not certain. Check out the Wikipedia entry on this, including the associated links.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born_citizen#US_presidential_candidates_born_outside_the_US
Never mind any gossip about Palin's daughter. This is a non-issue. What Americans should be worried about is her qualifications to be President from day one. If McCain wins the election, has his eligibility challenged in the Supreme Court, and is deemed ineligible, PALIN WILL BE PRESIDENT. THIS is important.
Posted by: Pericles | September 1, 2008 10:43 PM | Report abuse
Hey, jb:
Again, we're choosing a Commander-in-Chief here, not putting someone in the White House just because we met them at group therapy.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 10:42 PM | Report abuse
I don't think it is unreasonable to ask three questions:
What does it say about McCain that he chose a person with so much baggage as a running mate?
What, exactly, are Gov. Palin's positions on sex education, abstinence-only programs and birth control?
Is a person's family life a reflection of their fitness to stand as a country's leader?
Posted by: bill kapra | September 1, 2008 10:41 PM | Report abuse
Guess the Republicans will want to park a Double Wide next to the White House........
Posted by: Michael | September 1, 2008 10:40 PM | Report abuse
Palin Walks the Walk and Talks the Talk. Hats off to her. I feel if people keep on focusing on the Bristol issue, its going to make her look more human.
If truly still endorses a "abstainance" only sex education in schools, well she needs to go back to the drawing board to realize that her ideology is not the ideology of today's youth. Its evident. Luckily, Bristol was a good and honest young lady to take her dilemna to her parents vs. sneaking off to the abortion clinic which would really hurt her mothers reputation in public office. My support and prayers to Bristol. I commend her for going to her parents and her poise for all the "mud slinging". My respect to her for marrying the young man who was responsible (he should of worn a condom, so don't blame Bristol or Sarah). I hope people and media will leave Bristol alone. What if it were your child? Sarah Palin has won my respect for her integrity!
Posted by: jb | September 1, 2008 10:40 PM | Report abuse
The two serious issues raised by the illegitimate pregnancy of Sarah Palin's minor daughter don't have anything to do with whether Americans are compassionate about the difficulties that families face. The issues are:
1. John McCain has demonstrated impulsiveness and very poor judgement in choosing the un-vetted Palin as his choice for vice president.
2. However brave a face the evangelicals put on it, pregnancy in unmarried minor teens is not something to flaunt or celebrate. This is not what the majority of Americans mean when they say family values. It looks to me like the ticket for family values this year is the Democrats.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 10:40 PM | Report abuse
To forgiven biker:
If you're going to dole out such profound and dire judgments about Democrats, it might be helpful if you learned how to spell judgment.
Posted by: jillp | September 1, 2008 10:39 PM | Report abuse
It's all over the Internet that while Governor mom was away in Kuwait, DC, etc., Bristol would go to all-night orgies in Juneau.
She would do DP, gang bang, all sorts of stuff.
Apparently, no one has any idea who the father might be!
Half of Alaska - and some of Canada - did this chick.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 10:38 PM | Report abuse
Pretty strong reactions to a story about a soon-to-be 44 year old grandmother campaigning on 'abstinence only'.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 10:37 PM | Report abuse
Questions:
Governor Palin, when did you and your husband find out that your 16 year daughter was violating your family rules on abstinence? What action did you take when you learned that fact? What advice would you give other parents about how to deal with learning about that?
If you and your husband only found out that your daughter was violating your family rules on abstinence five months after she conceived a baby, what explanation do you have for that fact? Were you and your husband too busy with your other affairs to pay attention to what your daughter was up to? We note that you don't live in New York City where nobody knows their neighbors and lets each other know of coming trouble -- why didn't your friends and neighbors clue you in?
Do you think that your daughter's getting pregnant might be her way of getting you to notice her more?
Do you agree that you and your husband deserve equal blame for the neglect of your daughter's life that led to this situation? Do you believe that parents are utterly blameless when their children get pregnant? If not, in what way would you agree that you and your husband are to blame?
Was your daughter Bristol born less than nine months after you and your husband got married? Did you violate your own rules about abstinence? Was your daughter aware of this hypocrisy?
Posted by: Questions to be asked | September 1, 2008 10:36 PM | Report abuse
I'm betting little Bristol was in one of those abstinence only classes. With a name like Bristol, you can be sure there are trailer parks in Alaska too.
Posted by: Electric Bill | September 1, 2008 10:36 PM | Report abuse
We are the laughing stock of Western Civilization...Our European allies think that we have the Beverly Hill Billies, The Bundy's or a Jerry Springer episode as the 2nd most powerful person on the planet...How irresponsible of John McCain...Arent we in 2 wars, Russia is turning into Nazi Germany, Holland is pulling spies out because the US is going to strike Iran, we have a dying economy, the earth is attacking us and energy is out of control? How arrogant to think that nothing will happen to him...Disgusting.
I think he only succeeded in firing up the American people to reject this Maury Povich whose the daddy episode disguised as our Government that is supposed to be the envy of the world and people gave their lives for.
Posted by: Becky | September 1, 2008 10:36 PM | Report abuse
I find it ironic that Harvard Law-educated Michelle Obama -- the woman libs love to dump on -- would likely choose to be drawn and quartered rather than put her girls through anything even a fraction as bad as this Bristol Palin fiasco.
Even Joe Biden had to be talked into taking a Senate job he'd already won.....because he was so worried his sons wouldn't have adequate attention after their mother was killed.
On the other hand, it is well documented that John McCain has spent much of his married life with Cindy away from the family and kids.
But this doesn't even touch throwing your daughter under media scrutiny of the most private part of her life.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 10:36 PM | Report abuse
"Pretty strong reactions to a story about a pregnant girl that will not kill the baby."
She'll wish she had before this s ***storm is over!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 10:35 PM | Report abuse
The point is public policy. When abstinence fails - the results are a child having a baby, or an abortion. Why run that risk? It's an important question:
W h y r u n t h e r i s k?
Because we have some desire to stop teenagers from having sexual relations? Get real. Just because we don't teach it in school doesn't mean that teenagers won't figure it out on their own. Even Palin couldn't stop her own children from sex.
It's not exclusive is it? Abstinence and education? Let's do both.
Just for fun: I think this 'planning to marry' is just a throw away line. What we have in reality is: Sarah Palin's 17 year old daughter decided to become a single mother? What should the public policy be then?
Posted by: NoOneImportant | September 1, 2008 10:11 PM
------------------
NoOneImportant - Do you think contraceptives are 100% foolproof? Do you think that kids who are taught to use contraceptives in schools, offered condoms in schools but don't have any during the heat of the moment are immune to pregnancy? Seriously, do you think that teenage pregnancy is a planned event? Should parents check their sons' wallets when they leave the house to make sure that they are stacked with condoms? Go for it son, get laid. But make sure you wear that raincoat! Abstinence is one method to avoid teenage pregnancy. But teens have minds and bodies of their own. As I said before, it happens.
Posted by: Anthony | September 1, 2008 10:33 PM | Report abuse
Hey, forgivenbiker, as VP Cheney would say, "Go f *** yourself."
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 10:33 PM | Report abuse
Pretty strong reactions to a story about a pregnant girl that will not kill the baby.
Think of all the babies dying without this attention.
Posted by: Doug | September 1, 2008 10:32 PM | Report abuse
As a 75 year old, I have observed the Democrat Party morph into a collection of "baby killing, homosexual atheists who want to take my money and give it to someone else". The leftist blog's vile and vicious attacks on the Palin's reinforce this view. God will not have mercy on their souls when they face Him on judgement day.
Posted by: forgivenbiker | September 1, 2008 10:31 PM | Report abuse
This scandal will make McCain wish he were back in Hanoi.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 10:30 PM | Report abuse
"What kind of hypocrits preach abstinence, and then make excuses when it happens in your household?"
Are you disturbed because Bristol was not quietly hustled to an abortion clinic? Whatever happened to the mantra "my body, my choice?"
The young woman made a choice; why are you not celebrating her choice especially when it was made in the hostile environment of mean ol' evangelical parents?
Posted by: Stephen | September 1, 2008 10:29 PM | Report abuse
You are all missing the point. Her parents are happy that she made the CHOICE to keep the child.
Thank God we live in a country that allows us to make that CHOICE!
Posted by: Natalie | September 1, 2008 10:27 PM | Report abuse
jb:
You are so wildly off base, and yet such a good demonstration of how Americans keep choosing crappy leaders.
You would rather have a guy named Todd as first spouse of the nation, a guy whose family is so dysfunctional it almost defies comprehension, hob-nobbing with the likes of Hu, Calderon, Sarkozy and Putin than Michelle Obama, a graduate of Harvard Law School?
Please; go have your head examined.
And, again, since when is electing a president about bringing "real life problems" into the White House? That is so irrational it's frightening.
America is supposed to be selecting a leader here, not someone we know from group therapy!
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 10:27 PM | Report abuse
I'm sure Bristol Palin feels peachy that her personal business is now international news.
Trig, however, may be indifferent at this time.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 10:26 PM | Report abuse
To jb:
In response to your comment, "I cannot help but applaud Sarah Palin for her integrity with this situation and not "hiding" it like other politicians."
Do you honestly believe she didn't try to hide it? Haven't you seen ALL the pictures of her daughter holding baby Trig to HIDE the pregnancy?
The only reason she "came out with it" is because the story leaked. Let's not forget how she lied to all of us by saying that her daughter had a bad case of mono. She had a bad case of something alright, but it wasn't mono.
Posted by: peakmom | September 1, 2008 10:25 PM | Report abuse
"Hands down, I thank Sarah Palin for having integrity to come forth and guide Bristol in an adult direction. "
she's going to do this as leader of the most powerful country in the world?
if this is about 'life experience', MY MOM IS MORE QUALIFIED THAN THIS IRRESPONSIBLE 'PRO-FAMILY', 'PRO ABSTINENCE' IMBECILE.
is this a joke?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 10:24 PM | Report abuse
September 1st, 2008 9:70 pmI had decided to vote for Mr. McCain 8 months ago. When he announced Ms. Palin as his choice for VP running mate, my confidence in that decision was severely shaken given Ms. Palin's lack of substantive experience, and some of her rabid personal views. Also, troubling matters such as during her campaign for governor in 2006 she was, in direct contradiction to her first speech with McCain in Ohio, in FAVOR of the bridge to nowhere and then after being elected pulled the funding for it.
Not to mention the tremendous challenge as a parent that she faces raising a DS baby.
Today's announcement that Ms. Palin's unwed, 17 year old daughter is five months pregnant makes it clear to me that Ms. Palin needs to be giving exclusively to her family ALL her attention for the next four or five years.
The choice of Ms. Palin as Mr. McCain's running mate was one of the biggest mistakes that the Republicans could have made.
As long as Ms. Palin is the candidate for Vice President of the United States, a position that is just a heartbeat away from the Presidency, I cannot in good faith vote for Mr. McCain. If Ms. Palin truly wants the Republicans to have a chance to win this year, and is not just in this for her own glory, she will withdraw gracefully her candidacy and allow the Republicans to name someone who is both better qualified and not so mired in challenging personal situations.
Posted by: Max | September 1, 2008 10:24 PM | Report abuse
Allison, you are ridiculous. How do you
know anything about how Sarah Palin
deals with her children's feelings?
Your argument is baseless. You are
saying that some family issues should
keep her from being a VP candidate?
Obviously you would not be able to handle
those kind of pressures. And obviously
Sarah Palin is. Keep your "being greatly
troubled" to yourself. You're just making
that up. Go wash some dishes.
***Allison's comments below***
As a mother of a child with health issues, I am greatly troubled that a mother of an infant with Down Syndrome and a pregnant teenage daughter would put their own career desires first, without regarding the feelings of her children. In addition to clearly needing their mother now more than ever, they now have their private problems exposed to the world. Family values indeed.
Posted by: Jimmy the Chef | September 1, 2008 10:23 PM | Report abuse
This scandal will make McCain wish he were back in Hanoi.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 10:21 PM | Report abuse
What kind of hypocrits preach abstinence, and then make excuses when it happens in your household?. Is Bristol a good example for American Youth?
John McCain's Campaign has successfully put a white face on teen pregnancy. I hope Bristol's baby-dady heard Obama's tyrade to Black fathers who have children out of wedlock (which is the real issue here, not abortion). I thought Obama would definitely lose, because Mcain chose Palin, but she was chosen friday, and is wrapped in two anti-conservative issues on monday-good job, a daughter will have a child who is a year younger than his uncle, andf Palin is in a scandal wher it is alegged that she fired the public safety commisioner because he refused to fire her former brother in law . Family Values Dies in the republican party!!!!!!!! 09/01/2008
Posted by: chuck burnz | September 1, 2008 10:20 PM | Report abuse
Bristol Palin's pregnancy represents REAL LIFE that Washington has been so detached from. Someone Anonymous on this board called them the "Beverly Hillbillies", I would much rather have Sarah Palin's Family in the White house with their real life benign issues vs. a Whining Tactless Angry B#$* Michelle Obama whom is bound to offend dignitaries and their spouses. I like Obama, but can't stand his wife. In all honesty, My heart and admiration goes to Bristol Palin, she is an average teenager who was brave enough to go her family for support vs. sneaking to the abortion clinic which would of done more damage to her mothers career. She was responsible and not a coward.
Her mother, Sarah Palin, Lives what she stands for. She is an example.
I'm more pro choice, but with this issue, I cannot help but applaud Sarah Palin for her integrity with this situation and not "hiding" it like other politicians. She has more balls than John Edwards to come out and me honest. Sarah Palin is REAL and not disenfranchised from issues that plague normal Americans. She also has done a great job in being an Alaskan Governor. Hats off to Sarah Palin with handling this matter with grace.
I am independent, but what I have seen with Sarah Palin and how she is handling all the "mud" being thrown at her while she is qualified enough because she "ran a state", I'm voting republican. Hands down, I thank Sarah Palin for having integrity to come forth and guide Bristol in an adult direction.
Posted by: jb | September 1, 2008 10:19 PM | Report abuse
"Politico: Jewish Donors Appalled by Palin
Ben Smith reports what I've sensed: that Jews are not going to flock to a backwoods character like Sarah Palin. He says some donors are moving to Obama. Praise the lord, Smith isn't going in for the "Jewish voters" euphemism. There's a huge cultural divide to be gotten over. Sarah went to college in Moscow, Idaho. At least Bush went to Yale."
Posted by: From www.philipweiss.org | September 1, 2008 10:19 PM | Report abuse
obama:
biggest campaign in history
3 years us senate
8 yrs state senate
community organizer
law professor
president harvard law review
degree in constitutional law with honors
biden:
even more in depth resume
mccain:
POW
reckless loudmouth
palin:
embarrassingly deficient
Posted by: mm | September 1, 2008 10:17 PM | Report abuse
I find it remarkable that it's become taboo for democrats to speak about Sarah Palin's social values and view on sex education and birth control, but it is ALL the republican's CAN brag about. They spend hours focusing on the pro-life decision her family made. So again, it's okay for them to use the pregnancy to their advantage but not okay for anyone else to question? Yet another republican double standard - ho hum, yawn.
No one is attacking little Bristol. It is not Bristol's pregnancy that should be under the microscope. The girl made a mistake - it can happen in any family, republican or democrat.
However Sarah Palin is a woman who believes along with John McCain, that sex education should not be taught in our schools, that birth control should not be made available to our youth (not even condoms that will help stop the spread of deadly diseases), or to the poor, and that if McCain/Palin win, insurance companies should no longer pay for any form of birth control. She obviously believes that the only method of birth control is abstinence. Well, that's not the reality now, is it?
Oh, and one more thing: Thanks to the republicans we are indebted beyond the cost of our first permanent settlement on Mars, to the most pro-choice country in the world - China. In fact, 75% of their population supports their one child law unless the first child is a girl or disabled. The money the Chinese people pay their government for abortions is money we borrow to pay religious extremists for oil to fuel America and fund the biggest excuse for a war in the history of the world. Oh, the hypocrisy.
Whata' guy - whata' team.
Posted by: Peakmom | September 1, 2008 10:16 PM | Report abuse
BTW, the Clintons raised a daughter who graduated from Stanford.
Somehow, I don't think that's in the cards for Britol.
Republicans devalue academic achievement.
And that's fine. But they shouldn't then expect to be selected to lead the nation.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 10:15 PM | Report abuse
Speaking of morals, what about Obama's brother over in Kenya? I here he is living in a mud hut and Obama doesn't give a damn about him. That's Democratic values for you. Become a multi millionaire, and then forget about your desperately poor brother. Check it out here:
Posted by: Fred | September 1, 2008 10:15 PM | Report abuse
Free Radical:
You're blaming Clinton for 9/11?
Remind us who had been president for eight months when that happened?
What's the matter with Republicans? They can't view anything objectively. It's alway the childish, "It wasn't my fault!" or "You did it, too!"
Grow up, for crying out loud.
But, since you raise the comparison, would I rather have a Rhodes Scholar and graduate of Yale Law School on the phone with Putin, or the recipient of a degree from a third-rate state school dealing with a passel of dysfunctional children? Take a guess.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 10:12 PM | Report abuse
The big problem I have with this story is the hypocrisy. Does anyone here even dispute the idea that if this was Biden's daughter who was pregnant, under 18, and having sex with a man 10 years older than her that IT WOULDN'T BE NON-STOP NEWS on the MSM and Conservative Media???
Even conservative pundits here at Washington Post like Kurtz admitted to that bias: "Can you imagine what the right-wing crowd would be saying about this woman and her 20-month stint as governor of the igloo state if the tables were turned and Obama had picked her? The chortles? The level of mockery?"
Clear proof that even conservatives admit that there is a media bias against Democrats. Palin should be getting roasted for this hypocrisy.
Posted by: Eric | September 1, 2008 10:12 PM | Report abuse
"Bill and Hillary Clinton remained married despite high-profile marital woes. They decided to honor their vows."
See, here's the thing. Getting a hummer from a woman not your wife then lying under oath about it would be the polar opposite of 'honoring a vow'. It would, in fact, be the breaking of multiple vows; the vow of marriage, the vow of the oath to tell the truth. That's what's immoral. That liberals don't understand this is the basic reason why they have zero credibility on moral issues, and no standing to attack Palin. And of course, the law of the land, and the unstated preference, were such things left to liberals would be for the state to be required to assist the daughter with disposing of the inconvenience, the 'punishment' per BHO, of the baby without her parents even being notified. So much more 'moral'.
Posted by: Ray | September 1, 2008 10:12 PM | Report abuse
--"And those of you criticizing the policy of abstinence actually think that teenage sex is fine as long as contraception or abortion is used. But somehow, it is a tragedy, punishment if the young lady exercises her choice to bear the child. And you want to argue hypocrisy?
Posted by: Anthony | September 1, 2008 9:19 PM"--
The point is public policy. When abstinence fails - the results are a child having a baby, or an abortion. Why run that risk? It's an important question:
W h y r u n t h e r i s k?
Because we have some desire to stop teenagers from having sexual relations? Get real. Just because we don't teach it in school doesn't mean that teenagers won't figure it out on their own. Even Palin couldn't stop her own children from sex.
It's not exclusive is it? Abstinence and education? Let's do both.
Just for fun: I think this 'planning to marry' is just a throw away line. What we have in reality is: Sarah Palin's 17 year old daughter decided to become a single mother? What should the public policy be then?
Posted by: NoOneImportant | September 1, 2008 10:11 PM | Report abuse
Non American,
Not being deceived, especially about politicians' private lives is an American obsession.
This is why Bill Clinton got put on the spot about Monica.
We are obsessed with rules and equal application of standards. Even a sitting President or Governor will not be allowed to get away with deceiving to their constituencies if the people can help it.
While this occasionally causes us to get in an annoying tizzy about politicians' sex lives, this more often makes Americans stand in line, self-police, and sue when the system isn't working or when we believe our rights have been violated. This is pretty much the same across the board regardless of party affiliation, socioeconomic class or ethnic group.
Any American politician who believes they can play the "my personal life is irrelevant...so what if I lied?" card doesn't understand their fellow Americans.
I for one, wouldn't presume to be the flag-waving pro-life candidate without giving the people full information on how I've lived out the issue. Americans are really forgiving when politicians spill their guts with contrition. However, we tend to "crucify" anyone who lies to us. This is how Nixon's political future was destroyed. Likewise, John Edwards has no future and Palin may join his ranks very soon.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 10:11 PM | Report abuse
"THE ISSUE IS -- Sarah Palin threw her daughter under the bus to save her political career."
Democrats seem to be obsessed with reproductive organs, clocks, and buses. Why?
Posted by: Stephen | September 1, 2008 9:54 PM
__________________________
Is it true the GOP trains (see, I give equal opportunity obsession to other modes of transportation besides buses) their operatives in how to obfuscate on blogs?? You know, post meaningless drivel right after a bang-on (that would reflect my obsession with organs) post so that the next person to read the blog can't see the important stuff for all the obfuscating drivel?
It ticks me off (you are SO right, I DO obsess on clocks).
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 10:10 PM | Report abuse
Louis, I will help you out.
The Christian morality thing is this: we have a clear set of Biblical principles and guidance as to how we should live our lives. All of us Christians fail to fully live up to these ideals.
Bill and Hillary stayed married for political reasons. They have no real connection between themselves; they are pure political animals.
Not sure about McCain's story.
Biden taking the home to see his wife and kids every night is nice, but it is far from a complete picture of his morality. I'm sure he has his flaws.
Many evanglicals are in agreement with all or most of Sarah Palin's views, myself included. Once again, we acknowledge as flawed humans that we don't always live up to our high calling from God. But we don't quit, and we work with God to get better. You're the first one I've heard call Palin the "paradigm of Christian motherhood."
In politics, evangelicals love politicians who share their Biblical values and views, with the understanding that having high ideals doesn't mean that we don't sometimes fail. That doesn't make us hyppcrites, which can be defined as someone who professes a thing but in reality believes something else.
*****Louis' post below****
OK. Someone help me get this "Christian morality" thing straight. Bill and Hillary Clinton remained married despite high-profile marital woes. They decided to honor their vows. Their daughter is not pregnant. But they are "immoral." John McCain divorced the wife who stayed loyal to him while he was a POW to marry a beautiful young heiress. But he is "moral." Joe Biden takes Amtrak home to Delaware almost every night from Washington to be with his family, while Sarah Palin makes her pregnant 17-year-old daughter get married. Yet Sarah Palin is not only the "moral" choice, according to the Christian right, but also considered paradigm of Christian motherhood. I'm very confused. Shouldn't all this be the other way around?
Posted by: Fred | September 1, 2008 10:09 PM | Report abuse
Palin really disturbs me on so many levels: her illogical conservatism, her inexperience, the way she uses her personal life as some kind of patronizing, holier-than-thou badge.
As a mother of a child with health issues, I am greatly troubled that a mother of an infant with Down Syndrome and a pregnant teenage daughter would put their own career desires first, without regarding the feelings of her children. In addition to clearly needing their mother now more than ever, they now have their private problems exposed to the world. Family values indeed.
Posted by: Allison | September 1, 2008 10:07 PM | Report abuse
"Politico: Jewish Donors Appalled by Palin
Ben Smith reports what I've sensed: that Jews are not going to flock to a backwoods character like Sarah Palin. He says some donors are moving to Obama. Praise the lord, Smith isn't going in for the "Jewish voters" euphemism. There's a huge cultural divide to be gotten over. Sarah went to college in Moscow, Idaho. At least Bush went to Yale."
Posted by: From www.philipweiss.org | September 1, 2008 10:07 PM | Report abuse
Does anyone else think it was loathsome and deceptively cynical of the Palin family to let Sarah's newborn *handicapped* baby be used as a SHIELD to hide Bristol's bulging belly during the celebratory press conference on Friday? Notice it wasn't the *other* non-pregnant daugher who carried baby Trig around the whole time... If McCain knew about this, no wonder his body language during that event made him look like he wanted to rip his own skin off! Think I'm kidding? Just go to YouTube and watch a playback!
Posted by: Sorcha | September 1, 2008 10:06 PM | Report abuse
MBlaine: "Give me a break.
'Oh, Todd. Tell me if Putin calls. I'll be busy helping Bristol nurse her baby.'
Jeez."
Almost reminiscent of the Clinton years.
"What's that, Hil? Saudi hijackers have enrolled in some US flight schools? I'll get to it as soon as Monica finishes ..."
Posted by: Free Radical | September 1, 2008 10:06 PM | Report abuse
The Democrats are going to kick our butts. If we need a woman lets draft Condy Rice as our choice; if we want the most qualified; Mitt Romney. If we want an ex-model, mommy and soon to be 44 grandma lets keep our VP candidate. Obama is going to kick our butt.
Posted by: Die Hard Republican | September 1, 2008 10:03 PM | Report abuse
First of all, I do not belong to any party. While I do not like Palin, I do, however, like Senator Biden. I honestly believe he is an experienced and good person. I know I will get slack from republicans about his so called plagiarism, and his gaffes, but who here can say they never copied or used something someone else said? Who here can say that they never said something they shouldn't have? At least the man is honest, and no one can put down his family values.
In the democratic debates almost every candidate at one time or another made the comment "I agree with Senator Biden." This made an impression on me, because it seemed that while they were all attacking one another, they did not attack him, instead they followed his lead. This is significant in a potential leader. Also, He is well respected in the Senate, and to be elected as many times as he has by the people of his own state speaks volumes. So while the republicans can put him down, and Hillary supporters can be disappointed, the truth is the man would make a great VP.
Most likely, he wasn't the popular choice by the Democratic Party. After all he wouldn't pick up the woman vote, the gun people, or any other special interest groups. However, Obama picked him anyway. This said something big to me. It said that Obama was not just looking for someone to help him get elected, but for someone who could help him with the position of running this country. To me, that was the most significant thing of this whole election.
I have only voted once in my 47 years of life, and that was a local election in which one of the candidates was a danger to children, so I voted to help keep him out of office. The reason I have not voted in any other election is because I never found a politician that I felt actually cared about anything other than his own personal gain. If Obama was indeed like that he would never have chosen Biden. He would have picked Hillary or someone else who would have been a sure bet, like McCain was trying to do with Palin. So I will vote in this election, and I will vote for Obama/Biden.
Please take off your party hats and think about this country, the country where your children will grow up, the country that Americans once had great pride in, the country that was once respected worldwide. We have gone down hill so badly in both morals, and economics. We do need a change in this country and I am sorry but McCain and Palin are not it.
Posted by: KathyLibbey | September 1, 2008 10:01 PM | Report abuse
"our country needs her" . . . like a hole in the head!
What are you smoking, Massachussetts Independents For McCain/Palin?
Palin patently is NOT an accomplished woman. She believes the world is a mere 5,000 years old, and her family is a big fat mess.
Accomplished my foot!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 10:01 PM | Report abuse
This is hilarious! Isn't Obama the product of his teenage mom getting knocked up by a polygamist Kenyan? And now the Palin nonsense? God Bless America.
Posted by: Free Radical | September 1, 2008 10:00 PM | Report abuse
The hypocrisy and insincerity of the GOP is stunning.
It's sad that the reckless ambition of McCain and Palin have put such an unfair spotlight on this poor young girl.
Posted by: AF | September 1, 2008 9:58 PM | Report abuse
Are Democrats angry because Bristol's interpretation of "my body, my choice" will result in a child?
Are Democrats angry because she did not seek their permission?
What gives?
Posted by: Stephen | September 1, 2008 9:58 PM | Report abuse
Michael - I'm so glad you agree.
And yes, every posting you've made supports the bigot label I've placed upon you.
My biggest concern with Bristol Palin's pregnancy is the hope you are not the father. I don't want you procreating.
Posted by: Cynicism101 | September 1, 2008 9:58 PM | Report abuse
John Sidney "Songbird" McCain III:
Graduated 894 out of 899 students in his college class.
Rails against gov't waste, yet draws a $58,000/year disability pension (for mental reasons?) from the gov't while earning a senator's salary and enjoying his wife's $120 million inheritance.
Made far and away the worst VP choice in living memory.
Why should HE be president?
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 9:57 PM | Report abuse
There is little the Republicans could do at this point that would be more of a turn-off than what Obama and the DNC pulled on Hillary.
Former Dem
Posted by: rockrooky | September 1, 2008 9:56 PM | Report abuse
Sarah Palin is an excellent leader, an accomplished woman, and and up and coming star in the Repub party. Her Christian background and beliefs and her willingness to go against the status quo make her a perfect fit for the needs of our country in this time. Washington needs her, our country needs her.
She has years of executive experience as a mayor and as a governor. Obama has zero executive expereince. Obama has done little to nothing of note in his state and federal legislative experiences.
Let's see how the debate with Biden turns out.
**Massachusetts Independents for McCain/Palin
Posted by: Massachusetts Independents for McCain/Palin | September 1, 2008 9:54 PM | Report abuse
OK. Someone help me get this "Christian morality" thing straight. Bill and Hillary Clinton remained married despite high-profile marital woes. They decided to honor their vows. Their daughter is not pregnant. But they are "immoral." John McCain divorced the wife who stayed loyal to him while he was a POW to marry a beautiful young heiress. But he is "moral." Joe Biden takes Amtrak home to Delaware almost every night from Washington to be with his family, while Sarah Palin makes her pregnant 17-year-old daughter get married. Yet Sarah Palin is not only the "moral" choice, according to the Christian right, but also considered paradigm of Christian motherhood. I'm very confused. Shouldn't all this be the other way around?
Posted by: Louis | September 1, 2008 9:54 PM | Report abuse
"THE ISSUE IS -- Sarah Palin threw her daughter under the bus to save her political career."
Democrats seem to be obsessed with reproductive organs, clocks, and buses. Why?
Posted by: Stephen | September 1, 2008 9:54 PM | Report abuse
Michael asks,
"why do you care if we grow up or not?"
Because in a global society we are wise enough to realize the importance of your country ... maybe you don't and that is the real issue!
Posted by: Non American Watching | September 1, 2008 9:53 PM | Report abuse
I still do not believe that McCain was aware of Britsol Palin teen pregnancy, and he accepted her mother as his running mate.
Posted by: Politics_Pregnancy | September 1, 2008 9:51 PM | Report abuse
I still do not believe that McCain was aware of Britsol Palin pregnancy, and he accepted her as his running mate.
Posted by: Politics_Pregnancy | September 1, 2008 9:50 PM | Report abuse
"Just how could Bristol have been five month pregnant before she gave birth to Trig, who is four month old?"
The Palin camp claims Bristol is around 5 months pregnant TODAY and will give birth sometime in December. Perhaps it'll be one of those rare cases where the baby is late though.
Trig was born on April 18, which is about 5 months ago. It is chronologically possible. There are people who have their kids a year apart all the time.
It would make Palin look really bad if an underage daughter got pregnant twice in two years. I don't understand why the governor doesn't just release the medical records showing that Trig is hers and end all of the speculation.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 9:49 PM | Report abuse
The real issue is that this is a perfect example of a non issue!
I don't think Russia is going to invade another country because that girl got pregnant.
Live this girl alone and go back to discuss the real issues!
Posted by: Non American Watching | September 1, 2008 9:48 PM | Report abuse
Chris,
Here are a few questions I would like answered.
How many more scandals will it take for Palin to withdraw her nomination as vice president?
How many political and personal enemies does Palin have in Wasilla who are willing to go on the record?
The family values crowd and "moral majority" have historically promoted the idea that women's roles should focus on putting their children before their career. How then, can they reconcile Palin raising 5 children AND a new granddaughter (while her daughter finishes school) while performing her duties as vice president? Either the kids are raised by nannies (not exactly, the family first message) OR Palin's role as VP would be mostly symbolic.
What is Mccain suddenly dies in office during his 1st term and she has to assume the Presidency while raising two babies and three teenagers? Is she going to expect that her husband will be "Mr. Mom?"
What is Todd Palin's view on all this?
Posted by: billbolducinmaine | September 1, 2008 9:46 PM | Report abuse
Mblain, you are an idiot. You have know ideas what evangelicals believe. Your comments indicate your ignorance. Your place is away from the computer.
Evangelicals of today are far different than the picture you present. In the best cases, our families are centers of strong, connected, and godly life. Those restrictions on women you talk about are apparently Obama's thinking. Otherwise, Hillary would have been his VP choice (that choice would have also have ensure his victory).
***Mblain's spew below***
Family values folks ought to seriously consider that a mother with this many children should be at home with them. Truth is, social conservatives often say, had she taken care of her motherly duties instead politics, her daughter might not have become pregnant. Wouldn't it have been better to have the seventeen year old on birth control, pope or no pope? Then abortion and premature pregnancy would have not been the poor girl's only option.
In fact, evangelicals widely teach a woman's place is in the home, not the state capital. Palin and her supporters on the right are all little more then hypocrits.
Posted by: Fred | September 1, 2008 9:44 PM | Report abuse
"I have news for you, we stopped waiting for American leadership long ago!"
Just curious, then, Non-American: Then why do you care if we grow up or not?
Also, please let me apologize for the erratic behavior of my country the last few years. I can't quite explain it myself, but it sure appears as if this whole place has gone crazy!
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 9:43 PM | Report abuse
Don't get sidetracked on the wrong issue in this mess today.
1) It's NOT about whether abstinence education works or doesn't.
2) It's NOT about whether Palin was vetted thoroughly by the McCain campaign.
3) It's NOT about parenting skills.
4) It's NOT about hypocrisy of saying one thing and having your family do another.
It IS about a desperation to "answer" rumors on the freakin' Internet about whether Trig is actually Bristol's baby.
Instead of issuing a statement that said, "Trig is our darling son," the Palin's issued a statement saying their daughter Bristol is 5 months pregnant now leave us alone.
THE ISSUE IS -- Sarah Palin threw her daughter under the bus to save her political career.
Even if she did it at the urging of the McCain camp, she still
THREW HER DAUGHTER UNDER THE BUS.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 9:42 PM | Report abuse
"Palin's daughter is an error prone human being like all of us."
THAT IS NOT THE POINT!
By that reasoning, we should just have a lottery to see who becomes President of the USA and Commander-in-Chief of the military. One mediocre American would be just as good as any other in the White House, right?
But we are talking about the presidency, where - I've always assumed - we should strive to place a great leader and exceptional human being.
The Palins are a motley bunch of dysfunctional troglodytes. And that's fine. But do you want their fingers on the "nucular" button?!
Give me a break.
"Oh, Todd. Tell me if Putin calls. I'll be busy helping Bristol nurse her baby."
Jeez.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 9:41 PM | Report abuse
Michael,
You say "it's time the world start looking elsewhere besides the USA for leadership".
I have news for you, we stopped waiting for American leadership long ago!
Posted by: Non American Watching | September 1, 2008 9:38 PM | Report abuse
Just how could Bristol have been five month pregnant before she gave birth to Trig, who is four month old?
Can we use our brain and internet for something more productive such as education, energy and national security?
This is laughable in the 21st century. We are so conservative compared with Europeans.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 9:38 PM | Report abuse
For the record: I might be vicious, but I'm not an Obama supporter.
It's just that the Republicans are a global embarrassment, and now - by wanting to put an absolute mess of a woman next in line for the presidency - have put my country and the whole Earth in danger of untold disasters.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 9:37 PM | Report abuse
For the good of Bristol and all the rest of us -- why doesn't Sarah just stay home?
Posted by: David Le Vine | September 1, 2008 9:36 PM | Report abuse
Family values folks ought to seriously consider that a mother with this many children should be at home with them. Truth is, social conservatives often say, had she taken care of her motherly duties instead politics, her daughter might not have become pregnant. Wouldn't it have been better to have the seventeen year old on birth control, pope or no pope? Then abortion and premature pregnancy would have not been the poor girl's only option.
In fact, evangelicals widely teach a woman's place is in the home, not the state capital. Palin and her supporters on the right are all little more then hypocrits.
Posted by: M Blaine | September 1, 2008 9:35 PM | Report abuse
The latest rumor is about Barack having an affair shortly after he was married. And Michelle Obama approved. Got to go check that out....spread the news...
Posted by: Fred | September 1, 2008 9:35 PM | Report abuse
I wonder how old her boyfriend is? I hope he's not like 27.
Posted by: boyfriend | September 1, 2008 9:34 PM | Report abuse
"America, please grow up and get serious!"
Good point, Non-American, but I'm afraid as long as the mainstream remains mediocre and ignorant, the Republicans will stay viable.
So if you didn't already get the very strong hint over the Iraq debacle, it's time the world start looking elsewhere besides the USA for leadership.
We have lost our will, ability and minds.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 9:34 PM | Report abuse
"Palin's daughter is an error prone human being like all of us."
THAT IS NOT THE POINT!
By that reasoning, we should just have a lottery to see who becomes President of the USA and Commander-in-Chief of the military. One mediocre American would be just as good as any other in the White House, right?
But we are talking about the presidency, where - I've always assumed - we should strive to place a great leader and exceptional human being.
The Palins are a motley bunch of dysfunctional troglodytes. And that's fine. But do you want their fingers on the "nucular" button?!
Give me a break.
"Oh, Todd. Tell me if Putin calls. I'll be busy helping Bristol nurse her baby."
Jeez.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 9:32 PM | Report abuse
Bristol Palin better make sure McGrampy or MaPalin aren't behind her when she's walking down any stairs, because an "act of gawd" might then mysteriously occur and make this whole pregnancy issue go away.
Posted by: McCain/Palin = the stupid vote | September 1, 2008 9:32 PM | Report abuse
Being a mother and women , I am sickened by this women Sara Palin . Regardless of who this precious little baby boy Trig's mother is , his grandmother/mother needs to be at home with her family and to care for this young baby . What sort of mother with young children much less disadvantaged children goes about running all over the country trying to exploit her political aspirations ? Not a women or mother that I would trust in any executive office much less VP or God forbid President . John MCcain has really missed the boat on this . God Help us All.
Posted by: natisha | September 1, 2008 9:31 PM | Report abuse
frederick2,
Perhaps there are some vicious Repubs. But in this blog,the inhumanity and the twisted vicious logic for political gain is all coming from the left. It's very ugly.
And, generally speaking, the repubs are more civil, much less vicious. IMHO.
Posted by: John M | September 1, 2008 9:31 PM | Report abuse
Good riddance, LEAVING AMERICA SOON....
Obama has TWO years in the Senate, not eight.
Palin has been governor less than TWO years, no two terms.
But still, you can leave when you want to.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 9:30 PM | Report abuse
Sarah and Todd obviously were not providing the supervision needed for teens. Sarah does not seem to care about her future grandchild by putting her daughter thru all this. How can she and Todd do all this? She will be a bad mom, bad grandmom, and terrible vice-president.
I thought of voting for John McCain but if I did it would be voting for Child Abuse!!!
Posted by: Mary | September 1, 2008 9:28 PM | Report abuse
John M.
Do you think only the Democrats are vicious. There are a few Republicans on these various blogs that could qualify.
Posted by: frederick2 | September 1, 2008 9:27 PM | Report abuse
"America, please grow up and get serious!"
Good point, Non-American, but I'm afraid as long as the mainstream remains mediocre and ignorant, the Republicans will stay viable.
So if you didn't already get the very strong hint over the Iraq debacle, it's time the world start looking elsewhere besides the USA for leadership.
We have lost our will, ability and minds.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 9:27 PM | Report abuse
A lot of the liberal Obama supporters on this blog are truly vicious and inhumane. Obama seems like a decent man, but many of his supporters are just plain garbage.
Palin's daughter is an error prone human being like all of us. She is a teenager. I'm sure all of you were/are straight laced perfect young men and women as teenagers.
Christians are not perfect. Neither are you. We don't always live up to our high ideals. Believe me, the more you trash Palin and her family this way, the more the conservative backlash will be. So,say whatever you want.
Posted by: John M. | September 1, 2008 9:24 PM | Report abuse
I am just floored and disgusted by all of this. I am a registered republican, a woman, and I cannot stomach what is happening in America now. I am sure we have single-handedly become the laughing stock of the world. I had every intention of voting for MCcain because of my conservative values, and now with this stunt of a VP Selection, I am not voting at all. I will not taint myself with this faux presidential election. This woman has no experience whatsoever, Obama with his eight senate years, did not convince, me and now this two-term govenor is who I should put my confindence in?
Americans, democratic or republican should be outraged, But America is so divided by its party lines, that each will defend its own like a cheap gang of cowards. Even if it means the destruction of our future.
I am leaving this country very soon.
Posted by: MOVING OUT OF AMERICA SOON... | September 1, 2008 9:23 PM | Report abuse
Reading this blog is scary!
The criteria to select your leaders is idiotic and irrelevant to solve America's problems or to regain international prestige.
Posted by: Non American Watching | September 1, 2008 9:23 PM | Report abuse
Yes, Cynicism101, I believe a woman has no place in the workforce and my comments represent the worst of humanity. You're on to me.
Actually, I don't think a woman whose "nucular" family is a disaster ought to aspire to become Commander-in-Chief of the US military.
Can you imagine her in some historical situations?:
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this . . . Bristol, honey, I told you, the pacifiers are in the black handbag . . . where was I? Oh, yes: Mr. Gorbachev . . . What now, Bristol? Trig is spitting up? Do have to do everything around here? Mr. Secret Service guy, give Bristol a hand . . . OK. Mr. Gorbachev . . . umm . . . oh, forget it."
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 9:23 PM | Report abuse
I hate conspiracy theories almost as much as I hate small town liars that think they can out smart all of America.
Trig is her daughters and this whole announcment today is a sham.
The truth will come out because I am sure there are plenty of 16 and 17 yr olds that went to school with Bristol Palin that know the truth and high school kids LOVE to gossip.
Posted by: Patrick | September 1, 2008 9:22 PM | Report abuse
Sarah Palin lost the ability to control her kid's, and the daughter Bristol Palin took advantage of her mother's irresponsible and ignorant behaviour.
Posted by: Child-Abuse | September 1, 2008 9:21 PM | Report abuse
SO MUCH FOR THE PALIN FAMILY'S FAMILY VALUES.
Posted by: SIERRA HOLMES
You are SO right. they'd have had better morals if she'd a had a abotion huh?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 9:21 PM | Report abuse
Let's see, abstinence is not 100% fool proof. So let's get rid of the notion altogether. Brilliant. The young woman is not the first to get pregnant. She will not be the last. It happens. The family is dealing with it. Unfortunately, the family has to deal with it among millions throughout the world. That is life sometimes. This unexpected pregnancy was of her own doing. Her mom was already governor when she had intercourse. Again it happened. A little of an embarrassment to her, her mother and the family but not some great sin to any of them. And those of you criticizing the policy of abstinence actually think that teenage sex is fine as long as contraception or abortion is used. But somehow, it is a tragedy, punishment if the young lady exercises her choice to bear the child. And you want to argue hypocrisy?
Posted by: Anthony | September 1, 2008 9:19 PM | Report abuse
Hey Pat who cares about birth records. Your a conspiracy nut.
Posted by: patricc | September 1, 2008 9:19 PM | Report abuse
For the "good" of the party, Mrs. Palin will "voluntarily" decline the VP nomination and her "15 minutes of fame" will be tragically over by Thursday!
Posted by: David G. Ward | September 1, 2008 9:18 PM | Report abuse
Smithfield,
It seems the "bad omen" is your attempted propagation of untrue information.
Since you claim to have found this in three sources, how 'bout you bolster your nonexistent credibility by providing at least one reference?
Posted by: Cynicism101 | September 1, 2008 9:18 PM | Report abuse
SO MUCH FOR THE PALIN FAMILY'S FAMILY VALUES.
Posted by: SIERRA HOLMES | September 1, 2008 9:17 PM | Report abuse
SO MUCH FOR THE PALIN FAMILY'S FAMILY VALUES.
Posted by: SIERRA HOLMES | September 1, 2008 9:15 PM | Report abuse
Sorry for the all caps but I do not understand why no one is talking about this.
This is not some wacko leftwing blog or some phoney crap it is the hospitals official webpage, you think if they mistakenly left his name off you think they would have corrected it within 4 months.
I'm just saying.
Posted by: Patrick | September 1, 2008 9:15 PM | Report abuse
Hi anonymous,
My reply to your question (which is included below):
Right, she has a special needs infant, which will require lots of care. She also has a husband and a family, and a huge conservative base that is enbergized by her. She is a VP candidate, my friend, which is a very important "calling." I don't think she is self centered, family centered, or career centered. Based on what I know about her, I would say that she
is God centered. That's how a lot of us evangelicals think. Get to
know us.
Believe me, if she is the VP, her special needs child will be very
well taken care of. While she is campaigning, I'm sure that her
husband, family and extended family will help her all that they can
in caring for the special needs infant.
*******
John M - Don't you believe that someone who claims to have high family values, and then leaves their special needs infant to be raised by someone else is a hypocrite? This is someone who has chosen to put her career over her family, and this is self centered, not family centered.
*******
Posted by: Johh M. | September 1, 2008 9:14 PM | Report abuse
The issue here is not her daughter and her mistakes. Or even her parents mistakes in raising her, but that's another discussion.
The issue is a candidate who runs on, among other ideas, "teaching abstinence only in public schools". I guess her daughter forgot to take that course.
The hypocrisy is astounding.
Posted by: Smiling1 | September 1, 2008 9:13 PM | Report abuse
I feel sorry for the girl. This is such a big deal, and now, because of her mom, THE WHOLE WORLD is in on it.
Let's all pray for her. Sure, it makes the Republicans look stupid, but the fact is, everyone messes up. I just think Liberals admit it and Republicans pretend they don't.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 9:13 PM | Report abuse
While Russia invades Georgia the rest of us couldn't care less about the families of the poker of characters that aspire to 'lead the Free World'
America, please grow up and get serious!
Posted by: Non American Watching | September 1, 2008 9:13 PM | Report abuse
EVERYONE PLEASE VISIT THIS WEBSITE FOR YOURSELF AND SEARCH FOR TRIG PALIN'S NAME, EVERY OTHER BABY BORN AT THAT HOSPITAL IS LISTED WHERE IS HIS NAME?
Posted by: Patrick | September 1, 2008 9:12 PM | Report abuse
Anonymous, or should I call you Michael Blain, or should I call you Anon -
Show your courage - step and actually say what you mean: She's a woman and a mother, and thus has no place in the workforce.
Your comments are bigoted and asinine - and genuinely represent the worst of humanity.
Posted by: Cynicism101 | September 1, 2008 9:11 PM | Report abuse
A real mother would stay home and take care of her downs baby and pay more attention to her daughter. A woman cannot expect to hold a important job and be a mother. Palin is a lousy VP choice.
Obama/Biden 08 Hill 16
Posted by: George | September 1, 2008 9:09 PM | Report abuse
A Becker you are so right. The key word here is "decision". They are praising her "decision" to keep the baby, as if it were her choice. But, according to what they claim to believe, they are against choice. I don't get it.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 9:09 PM | Report abuse
It is still to be seen how Palin's daughter's pregnancy will impact McCain's push for the white house. One thing seems evident, this woman was clearly not vetted. Almost from the announcement of her joining the ticket there has been a steady stream of unflattering news about her. First it was the investigation she is under for abuse of her power and office in the firing of the top official for public safety, because he in turn refused to fire her brother-in-law, as he was being pressured to do. Then came word of her flip flopping on her position to the 'Bridge to nowhere.' Now the pregnancy of her teenage daughter. McCain has got to be of the verge on cardiac arrest at this point as he waits with bated breath for what else may come to light.
Posted by: str8up | September 1, 2008 9:09 PM | Report abuse
how can the delegates draft Mitt Romney as the VP?
Posted by: MassGOP | September 1, 2008 9:08 PM | Report abuse
BAD OMEN
ABC, NBC and AP REPORT MCCAIN IS RE-VETTING SARAH.
Posted by: bob North Smithfield | September 1, 2008 9:06 PM | Report abuse
The Palin wome are welfare queens, having more children than they can care for, and living off money provided by the State of Alaska.
It's disgraceful and un-American.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 9:05 PM | Report abuse
It was fun reading through the comments. SOme real pissed off liberals, leftist crowd here.
Dems blew 08 for not having Hillary on the ticket. Now the same Hate machine trying to torpedo another woman. Go get a life and a job. You'll might need it again.
Posted by: vic | September 1, 2008 9:05 PM | Report abuse
Her teenage daughter makes a mistake Does the right thing by her baby, and now you say her mother is some kind of hypocrite?
Do you really think this comes across as hypocrasy by any real christian?
What an amazing bunch of monsters so many of you are!
All of us make mistakes. It's what we do about them that matters. Could you imagine saying the same things to your own daughters?
Posted by: John | September 1, 2008 9:04 PM | Report abuse
Politics in this country is a grand charade, a massive fraud.
The Palin debacle merely underlines this.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 9:03 PM | Report abuse
Don't we have a Democratic candidate who is the result of a pre-marital pregnancy? Apparently his mother left the responsibility of raising her son with her parents. And how many of his supporters are single unwed mothers? At the same time, one wonders why the Governor did not say "thanks, but no thanks" to this honor.
Posted by: marie | September 1, 2008 9:03 PM | Report abuse
Wait, I'm confused. I thought the Christian right was against pre-marital sex. But now they're holding Bristol Palin up as the new icon of their values because she had pre-marital sex and decided to keep her baby? Aren't they worried about the kind of message this sends to other teenage girls, whom they are supposedly urging to remain abstinent out of the other side of their mouths? And how is it that a 17-year-old is ready to commit for life to a husband? Aren't they worried about the message this obviously shot-gun wedding sends to teenage girls? I'm really confused. Maybe they're just gloating because it's the first time that one of their scandals didn't involve gay sex in bathrooms, drugs or hookers!
Posted by: Louis | September 1, 2008 9:01 PM | Report abuse
McCain is playing with the hearts andminds of America. Thinking that females will vote for Palin just because she's a women, well women aren't dumb so think again. Everything that they have said was a plus for her is a negative. She wants money for the bridge, there was no shake up in Alaska it is what happens when someone new takes office. She began to ask questions because she was a young politician and mistakenly shook things up. Her daughter shouldn't be up for discussion, but Palin's decision's should. She didn't put her family first in trying to be Gov of Alaska (daughter pregnant) which means she won't put the American people first. McCain is playing America saying that the rumors had surfaced on the internet in the last 72hrs, but they have been on there for months. They put the information out there when the nation was acting like a family and focusing on Gustav. He's deceiving the American people and the conservatives love it. Please don't let him manipulae you like he's try to do.
Posted by: Worried | September 1, 2008 9:01 PM | Report abuse
Help me figure this out. We should not be commenting on this pregnancy because it's a private family matter. OK?
However, a great deal was made in the announcement of Palin's selection about her decision to bring to full term a pregnancy of a child with Down syndrome?
NOT a private family matter??? Help me understand why one is OK and the other is not.
Posted by: Bob | September 1, 2008 9:01 PM | Report abuse
OK - so you think the villain here is Gov Palin for accepting a VP nomination knowing her daughter is pregnant. You can't possibly be serious?
How about you put the true blame where it belongs - on obvious consumer demand for the hate machine tabloid politics that make this an issue? Obviously, you're not going to take that approach - it would force you to acknowledge you excessively petty behavior.
She's still the Governor of Alaska - do you suggest there is no local hoopla that will be generated in AK? Sure, it's unlikely that Kos/Moveon/huff-n-puff wouldn't focus on slandering her family if she was still the unknown Alaskan. But again, how do you not see that the true evil is from those sources, and not from her. Could it be you're part of the sleaze force?
Posted by: Cynicism101 | September 1, 2008 9:00 PM | Report abuse
Politics in this country is a grand charade, a massive fraud.
The Palin debacle merely underlines this.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 9:00 PM | Report abuse
Wait, what were the kids' names again? Track, Trig, and . . . Tramp?
Posted by: laughing in DC | September 1, 2008 9:00 PM | Report abuse
John M - Don't you believe that someone who claims to have high family values, and then leaves their special needs infant to be raised by someone else is a hypocrite? This is someone who has chosen to put her career over her family, and this is self centered, not family centered.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 8:59 PM | Report abuse
Well that is interesting. I guess race won't be an issue now that Palins new son in law is BLACK. But I read he was in jail and is a rapist. If those are the family values that Palins family accepts.
I WILL VOTE FOR BARACK OBAMA
Posted by: Julie M | September 1, 2008 8:59 PM | Report abuse
The candidate's family should not be the focus today. Palin lied about the bridge to nowhere in her first words to the country. She misrepresented her opposition. McCain's belief in her was apparently spurred by her staunch opposition to wasteful spending. However, Palin supported the bridge before she opposed it, and the dollars for it merely went to other projects in Alaska. Did McCain know these facts? If he did, he misled the public as much as Palin did. If he did not, he seems not to have vetted her at all.
Posted by: HarrisCo | September 1, 2008 8:55 PM | Report abuse
The candidate's family should not be the focus today. Palin lied about the bridge to nowhere in her first words to the country. She misrepresented her opposition. McCain's belief in her was apparently spurred by her staunch opposition to wasteful spending. However, Palin supported the bridge before she opposed it, and the dollars for it merely went to other projects in Alaska. Did McCain know these facts? If he did, he misled the public as much as Palin did. If he did not, he seems not to have vetted her at all.
Posted by: HarrisCo | September 1, 2008 8:54 PM | Report abuse
The important point is NOT that her daughter got pregnant.
The key question is, Why did Gov. Palin and John McCain KNOWINGLY ignore this poor girl's right to privacy on such a sensitive issue?
Did they not realize that millions of people would now invade this girl's privacy when Gov. Palin agreed to the VP job, especially when they parade her around as the "family values" candidate?
The callousness and judgement says alot of both of them...as parents, as well as leaders.
Posted by: JK | September 1, 2008 8:54 PM | Report abuse
Obama is right, reporters and rumor mongers should lay off Palin’s daughter.
But what about millions of other women faced with the same difficult situation, whom Palin and McCain vow to deny the right to make the decision they praise Bristol for making (whether to end the pregnancy). Will the Republicans lay off of other women’s right to make their own decisions?
Though her mom extolls abstinence, Bristol apparently was having sex while home from school sick in bed with mononucleosis. Never mind “values” – what kind of family is that?
Elderly McCain’s cynical choice of a VP candidate with zero national or foreign experience and only 20 months running a small state government was dubious. Even more dubious is how Palin and the First Dude have run their family.
America deserves executives with better judgment than McCain and Palin have shown.
Posted by: A Becker | September 1, 2008 8:52 PM | Report abuse
Republican---> Moralistic person with good intentions and with human failings. Striving to be a better person.
Democrat----> Amoral person with good intentions and with human failing with no desire to become a better person.
Posted by: TruThat | September 1, 2008 8:51 PM | Report abuse
As a conservative and an evangelical,
I'll make a couple of points here:
1) While I don't condone pre-marital sex,
her decision to marry the father is
a good one. Like everyone else, we
evangelicals make mistakes.
2) A hypocrite is better said to be one
who says he/she believes something
thathe/she really does not believe. Not doing what you know/think
is right is really not being a
hypoctrite. It's being an imperfect
human.
3) This issue will do little to know harm
to McCain/Palin suport. In fact, its
backlash might actually cause the
already energized base to be even more
energized. Myself, I will send my first
$50 donation to the McCain/Palin
campaign tonight.
Posted by: John M. | September 1, 2008 8:46 PM
=====================
The scraps from the edges of Karl Rove's playbook are still hanging off of this post.
Some staffer calling the base "energized". No real voter uses this word to describe him or herself.
Even pink bunnies wearing sunglasses and beating drums don't use this word to describe themselves!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 8:51 PM | Report abuse
So the primary assertions I see here are that:
A - Gov Palin is unqualified because her 17yr old daughter is pregnant.
B - It's appropriate for the "democrat hate machine" to openly attack and vilify the immediate family members of a candidate because they're still sour about the attacks made against Kerry, the actual candidate.
C - Because her daughter is pregnant, she should recuse herself, or the Republicans should rescind her nomination.
Is that really all you've got? Is that really your best demonstration of your faith for your Obamasiah?
A - maybe the pregnancy could be construed as a campaign issue if at the time of conception, she uttered - "finally, for the first time in my life I'm (really) proud of my country"
B - Chelsea Clinton was off limits. Malia and Sasha Obama have been off limits - and will continue to be. The Bush children have constantly been vilified by the left, and now the same holds true for the Palin children.
Democrat party as the party of tolerance - No, no you are not - and you're doing a great job of proving you're not.
C - Sorry, but I can see through your duplicitous transparency. You're salivating at the opportunity to get John McCain to dump Gov Palin so you can begin attacking him for being so ruthless to women for throwing a candidate under the bus for no campaign-relevant reason...
Posted by: Cynicism101 | September 1, 2008 8:50 PM | Report abuse
This only emboldens the terrorists: They see that in America even the upper echelon of political elites is not impregnable.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 8:50 PM | Report abuse
Forget the unimportant pregnancy. The real news, from ABC, is that she is a secessionist.
God help us all.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/09/members-of-frin.html
Posted by: Auster1 | September 1, 2008 8:50 PM | Report abuse
Oh you guys! Don’t you get it? This is all a big ploy by the republicans to wait until the last minute, and then have McCain have a stroke or something, and have Palin drop out due to family commitment. See then they can bring in their real candidate.
Posted by: KathyLibbey | September 1, 2008 8:50 PM | Report abuse
'Michael Blaine wrote: "The federal government ought to promote an anal sex-only curriculum in our schools so that our daughters arrive at the marriage altar at least technically virgins."
Anal sex is normal in many parts of southern Africa for the unwed for this very reason. It is also the reason for the high AIDS rate among heterosexuals. Not something anyone should be promoting, anywhere.'
But American youth would be told to use a condom.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 8:48 PM | Report abuse
If Gov. Sarah Palin knew her daughter was pregnant before Sen. McCain offered her the job why in the world would she accept it. She is busy cleaning up Alaskan corruption when she should be parenting her daughter. It amazes me that she can sit back and watch her daughter go through this media circus. How can Gov. Palin push abstinence as sex education in schools when it didn't work in her own home. I think the Gov. has a 4 month old who needs her at home and a teenager who is going to need her more than she thinks. And based on this she better stay home and keep an eye on the other kids.
Posted by: kathleen | September 1, 2008 8:48 PM | Report abuse
Numb-WHAT?!? "Oh, NUMNAH!" National Spelling Bee
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NaQ22DM0mjs
Karl Rove can spell? - National Spelling Bee
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65I0HNvTDH4
Posted by: Circle of life | September 1, 2008 8:47 PM | Report abuse
Palin Scandals inside scoop http://www.theveep.com
Posted by: Diane | September 1, 2008 8:46 PM | Report abuse
As a conservative and an evangelical,
I'll make a couple of points here:
1) While I don't condone pre-marital sex,
her decision to marry the father is
a good one. Like everyone else, we
evangelicals make mistakes.
2) A hypocrite is better said to be one
who says he/she believes something
thathe/she really does not believe. Not doing what you know/think
is right is really not being a
hypoctrite. It's being an imperfect
human.
3) This issue will do little to know harm
to McCain/Palin suport. In fact, its
backlash might actually cause the
already energized base to be even more
energized. Myself, I will send my first
$50 donation to the McCain/Palin
campaign tonight.
Posted by: John M. | September 1, 2008 8:46 PM | Report abuse
Who says she got abstinence only program. Did anyone think that maybe she had sex education in school? Or that maybe she WAS on birth control or condoms and it did not work?
Maybe its the fault of all you hollywood tramps and macho absent dem fathers fault!
Posted by: B=control | September 1, 2008 8:45 PM | Report abuse
This is Classic McCain - Ready, Shoot, AIM!
Posted by: bizezgrrrl | September 1, 2008 8:44 PM | Report abuse
NBC news just reported the bf of Bristol is 18. Good job to all of you rumor mongers saying the boy was much older. Brilliant... I guess you can take back all the BS you spilled on that topic. Oh!! you can't.. it's already posted.
Bunch of boneheads..
Posted by: kal | September 1, 2008 8:43 PM | Report abuse
Obviously the Republicans stand on "teaching abstinence" in the classroom isn't so effective! Bristol is a poor and DISGUSTING reflection of her mother's parental values. What sort of message are the Palin's sending to 17 year olds around the country? That it's acceptable for young ladies STILL IN HIGH SCHOOL to get pregnant? Sarah needs NOT to sugar coat the issue.
Yes, I understand Bristol is not the candidate running for Vice President but I expect Sarah Palin's family to be exemplary role models for other families. THIS IS DOWN RIGHT SHAMEFULL!
Posted by: Grace | September 1, 2008 8:43 PM | Report abuse
Michael Blaine wrote: "The federal government ought to promote an anal sex-only curriculum in our schools so that our daughters arrive at the marriage altar at least technically virgins."
Anal sex is normal in many parts of southern Africa for the unwed for this very reason. It is also the reason for the high AIDS rate among heterosexuals. Not something anyone should be promoting, anywhere.
As for Palin, I think its time she stopped lying to the American people. She has failed as a mother, her governorship is under investigation, and has said she believed she could be a governor and properly take care of her family. Anyone with children, especially teenagers, knows what the Palins must be going through, but they also know why it happened, an absentee mother. And now, with more children to raise, she wants to serve as Vice President. This woman is either a bad mother or thinks, like "liberals", that you can have it all.
Do her a favor in November and stay at home and don't vote republican. She should not get the vote of one caring parent. Once she loses the election in November, and is impeached by the Alaskan legislature (another story), she will finally be where she should be, at home taking care of her kids.
Posted by: Fate | September 1, 2008 8:42 PM | Report abuse
Now we know why Track volunteered to go to Iraq: To get away from his dysfunctional family of lunatics!
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 8:40 PM | Report abuse
OK Chris, get to work... Which potential Vice presidential candidate said No to McCain precipitating this debacle ?
I'm not going to do all the work for you.
Posted by: rixx | September 1, 2008 8:40 PM | Report abuse
Gosh ... hope you're all Gretchen Wilson fans, because I'm guessing 'Red Neck Woman' will be Palin's campaign theme song!
Karl Rove's fingerprints are all over this one ... the last untapped demographic to mobilize.
Let me hear a big hell yeah from the redneck girls like me! Hell yeah!!!
Posted by: bizezgrrrl | September 1, 2008 8:39 PM | Report abuse
The rumor about Trig being Bristol's baby has been circulating in Alaska since his birth 4 months. I keep hearing that this rumor has been around for about 72 hours on the internet and is the product of the Liberal's imagination. Both the birth rumor and its invention by the liberals are pure fabrication.
More from the soap opera that is Sarah Palin's life to follow...
Posted by: juneaugal | September 1, 2008 8:39 PM | Report abuse
The point is that Palin reportedly wants to criminalize the use of (all) contraceptives even between married couples. You don't have to be pro-choice to find this very extreme, and a violation of privacy. Unfortunately, in this context her family life does become relevant information for voters to weigh.
Moreover, Palin has played the downs baby as a politcal card (to woo evangelicals), maybe even her strongest one. If the story as she tells it is a fabrication, we need to know. At the same time I feel this attention is tragic for the daughter, and that many of the comments on this site (those that joke about the situation) are highly inappropriate.
Posted by: Matt | September 1, 2008 8:39 PM | Report abuse
"Songbird"/"Trailer Trash" In '08! God Bless The USA!!!!
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 8:38 PM | Report abuse
I feel sorry for Bristol, but hope the family values group gives up on abstinence-only education since one of their own has provided proof of what a waste of time and energy it is.
Posted by: DWinFC | September 1, 2008 8:38 PM | Report abuse
Wrong: Gallup has Obama up 6 and CBS has him up 8, according to Drudge.
So despite the racial drag, flaws in poll methodology, and under-the-radar campaigning against him by the Clintons, he got his bounce.
________
Polls have Obama and McCain dead even or within 1 to 2 points. So much for that boost the Annointed One was suppose to get after the convention.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 8:04 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 8:36 PM | Report abuse
is it too late for mitt or pawlenty?
Posted by: cbjs21 | September 1, 2008 8:36 PM | Report abuse
Wow Jimmy thanks for the link to the http://www.veeppeek.com Those Pictures are hallarious., Ha Ha. I think we should leave the youngster alone.
Posted by: Peter | September 1, 2008 8:35 PM | Report abuse
"I havent heard one lie yet about the girls pregnancy. It was private but it came out and the family said yes she's pregnant. What lie?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 7:13 PM"
Gov. Palin withheld a material piece of information relevant to her pro-life platform. Her supporters had a right to know her family situation, and since Bristol is still a minor in her custody, it's relevant.
Also, Gov. Palin still hasn't shot down the allegations that Trig is Bristol's son and that she (Gov. Palin) faked a pregnancy to cover this up. The statement from her only announced that Bristol is currently pregnant. Nice try to get the blogs off her back, but not going to persuade the increasingly suspicious masses.
Another low move was to leak the first name of the baby's father. Her daughter lost her privacy (not her choice). Did the governor get the baby's father's parents' permission to release his first name, which is a lot less common than "John" or "Mike". Somehow, I think it's doubtful, and through light websearches people have already identified the boy's last name as well. That will send the press hounds on a different track for about 5 minutes. Does a boy who made a mistake also need to get dragged through this so that Sarah Palin can get a shot at being VP? This is disgusting, disgusting.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 8:35 PM | Report abuse
As a seventeen year old girl raised in Catholic school, the idea of abstinece has been emphisized heavily throughout my life. I agree that the press should leave Bristol out of the picture, and perhaps focus more on the mother. My mother brought me up right, with good values and making good decisions. She has always been there for me, giving good guidence.
I question what guidance Sarah Palin gave to her daughter. Its seems like she didn't spend enough time with her instilling those good Christian morals. Now Mrs. Palin has taken a job that will take her further away from her children...now what will happen to the other ones?
The Right has made fun of Hillary Clinton, but Hillary Clinton has raised an intelligent and thoughtful daughter. Oh irony...
Posted by: Kul | September 1, 2008 8:34 PM | Report abuse
its 2 am sarah, do you know where your daughter is?
http://www.stupidsheeple.com/images/stories/palin/l_26a4878e413d15515859a652d714fa5f.jpg
Posted by: mike hawk | September 1, 2008 8:33 PM | Report abuse
NEWS FLASH
FATHER OF PALIN'S UNWED DAUGHTER HAS ANOTHER CHILD FROM A PREVIOUS GIRL FRIEND HE DID NOT MARRY.
WILL THIS NEVER END????
SEE HIS WEBSITE
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=7775827
Posted by: Bob North Smithfield | September 1, 2008 8:33 PM | Report abuse
Good idea Michael. We'll let Barney Frank know that you are in favor of anal-sex.
Posted by: bruce | September 1, 2008 8:31 PM | Report abuse
Shoulda killed that downs baby in the womb and paid more attention to her daughter.
Obama/Biden 08
Posted by: jerome | September 1, 2008 8:31 PM | Report abuse
Repubs were all over Chelsea for smoking a cig, seems only fair the dems chastise Bristol for smoking a pole.
Posted by: Zeta | September 1, 2008 8:30 PM | Report abuse
This is not about Palin's parenting. It's about the fact that conservatives like Palin have been making personal issues into political issues for years to get votes. They never seem to learn that messing with other people's personal lives can come back to bite them in the behind, as it has with David Vitter, Larry Craig, and now Palin.
If Governor Palin wants Americans to leave her personal life alone, she should set the example by keeping her mouth shut about the personal lives of others. No more speeches about abstinence education and same-sex marriage, Sarah! People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
Posted by: simon | September 1, 2008 8:30 PM | Report abuse
I like Palin, Her kid gettin pregnant just shows that she has to deal with the same stuff as the rest of us. There are other scandals with her that hold more wieght you can see them at http://www.veeppeek.com
Posted by: Jimmy | September 1, 2008 8:30 PM | Report abuse
This is the same cr^p Obama and his gang pulled on Hillary.
Spreading lies and then saying Obama didn't do it. This cr^p is getting old.
Posted by: Jen | September 1, 2008 8:30 PM | Report abuse
Horrible. If Palin's cannot keep control of her underage daughter, then how will she be able to keep control of our country. I think this is a perfect example of people who want power but clearly cant keep control of the power they have. I am Republican and this just disgusts me. If McCain doesn't do the right move and drop her from the camp then i will be forced to not vote for him, period.
Posted by: anom | September 1, 2008 8:29 PM | Report abuse
The federal government ought to promote an anal sex-only curriculum in our schools so that our daughters arrive at the marriage altar unpregnant and at least technically virgins.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 8:28 PM | Report abuse
Are my fellow Democrats insane? This family drama has nothing to do with the race, isn't a "tragedy" and says almost nothing about Sarah Palin. Commentary on Palin in general and on this in particular has ranged from disgusting to inexpressively repulsive. Hillary and Bill got a lot of this too. In the last week I've move from holding my nose and going with Obama, to not voting to seriously looking at McCain.
Posted by: bri | September 1, 2008 8:28 PM | Report abuse
Who is taking care of the children now, especially the youngest? That child needs all the attention possible. Who will take care of the children should they win? My observation is as follows: 1)If John McCain was thinking beyond himself he would have never in a million years asked this family to be part of his run for President. I can't even guess how this woman can try to raise a family and run a state while the husband works. Now wanting to be 2nd in command of the entire country!! 2)If this woman was not so into herself, she could have just said no. Now the most holiest of us now are defending the both of them! So much for worrying about the family. Judgement by the both of these individuals are poor at best. I guess "Do as I say not as I do" should be their new talking points.
Posted by: just thinking | September 1, 2008 8:25 PM | Report abuse
Bob North Smithfield, thanks for the knowledge (below).
Note to Obama: it is arrogant of you to tell the press, including the blogs (who have doggedly tracked this story when mainstream media wouldn't) to "stand down." This is bigger than you.
The press has a higher responsibility to report on matters affecting the presidential campaigns.
Misrepresentations by a vp candidate about biographical matters central to their message, as we have here, is news.
Because of the blogs/Enquirer's reporting, it seems likely now that Palin will soon step down under the pretense of needing to devote more time to family. If that happens, then Senator McCain might pick a qualified veep like Colin Powell or Michael Steele that might well make me vote for McCain. So you, sir, stand down and chill...look, bro' it ain't always about you.
_______________
NEWS FLASH
NBC and ABC REPORT MCCAIN CAMP IS RE-VETTING SARAH.
A TEAM OF 10-LEFT FOR ALASKA THIS AFTERNOON.
McCain looks like a fool!!!
Posted by: Bob North Smithfield | September 1, 2008 7:58 PM
Posted by: Broadway Joe | September 1, 2008 8:25 PM | Report abuse
just suppose Obama had chosen Hillary to be his running mate, and just suppose it was learned that Chelsea was 5 months pregnant and planned to have the baby and marry the father at some point.
Can you imagine the firestorm the GOP's thugs would ignite over that, not to mention the snide asides McCain and his top spokespeople would engage in in that circumstance?
What hypocracy!
What vetting was actually done? I bet McCain really didn't know this imortant fact when he chose Sarah Palin. But if he did what does that say about his judgment in making crucial decisions?
Posted by: DavidE | September 1, 2008 8:22 PM | Report abuse
These Palin Women seem to be quite fertile and clearly not big on birth control! How demanding is the role of VP and can it be fulfilled whilst pregnant?
Posted by: bizezgrrrl | September 1, 2008 8:21 PM | Report abuse
"Abstenance"?????????????
How about "abstinence"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Where did some of you bozos get your education? Dumb s**t school????
The spelling and grammar on this site is atrocious!!!!! If you can't spell, how can you form an intelligent political position?
Posted by: antidisestablishmentarianism | September 1, 2008 8:20 PM | Report abuse
It is 3am. As predicted by Hillary, the phone always rings in the white house at this time.
Cindy McCain is fast asleep after a late night beer bask party at the local brewery.
Ring Ring. McCain answers the phone thinking it is Merckel calling him saying
Putin has invaded France.
McCain: hell ohh!!
On the other end: John this is Sarah Palin. I ran out of diapers and both my kid and my grand kid are pooping on my bed. What should I do?
McCain: Sarah, just leave those kids alone, let them clean their own poop. I want you to come over here right now and run this damn country. I am tired of sitting by the phone every night at 3am. I have to take care of Cindy now who is barfing all over the bed in the Lincoln bedroom.
Posted by: Kevin McAlister | September 1, 2008 8:20 PM | Report abuse
This is insane. The media has gone nuts about a teen pregnancy. This is a personal matter and who really cares.
On the other hand, here is Obama committing crimes - election fraud and violating voter's rights by sending his thugs into caucuses to steal delegates using theft, threats, force, and every kind of fraud imaginable.
He ended up stealing the nomination! And, does anybody care? We care when this happens in other countries, but not here in America?
This is shameful, undemocratic, and un-American.
http://wewillnotbesilenced2008.com/video/index.htm
...
Posted by: Ted | September 1, 2008 8:20 PM | Report abuse
NEWS FLASH
FATHER OF PALIN'S UNWED DAUGHTER HAS ANOTHER CHILD FROM A PREVIOUS GIRL FRIEND HE DID NOT MARRY.
WILL THIS NEER END????
SEE HIS WEBSITE
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=7775827
Posted by: bOb North Smithfield | September 1, 2008 8:18 PM | Report abuse
Since when does failed parentship give one any credentials? Palin's daughter, if she were a daughter of a democrat, would be leveled by religious charges by the crazy right wing of the evangelical republican party. But since she is "one of them", its all ok, and its ok for her to marry a guy who got her in this condition. And the Palin's are happy!
I'm sorry, these republican religious fascists really live in another world. A world of relativism.
Typical evangelical republican meeting a 17 year old girl who is pregnant out of wedlock: 'Oh, you're 17 and you're pregnant? Before I judge you I have just one question: Are you a republican or a democrat?
Posted by: Fate | September 1, 2008 8:17 PM | Report abuse
FamilyFirst? has it down to the brass tacks...
"Where is the thought that a "pro-family" candidate is throwing her own family under a bus? She has a newborn that needs SO much love, help, and attention; yet she runs. She has a 17 year old who is pregnant, knows the entire country will now be judging her daughter, and still runs.
Where I come from, this isn't pro-family. It's selfish."
And yes, it DOES matter that her daughter is pregnant--and I am not condemning the daughter here. I think it is highly irresponsible of Palin and McCain--to the country and to her family. The Palin's do have a right to their privacy and I truly wish them the very best. With a lot of love and family support, they will make it through this. But it is not wise to lay out this example as an entree to national leadership.
Walking the walk has as much to do with being there for your family, guiding their steps, knowing what is going on under your own roof--as it does with standing by right-to-life convictions. We bear at least as much responsibility to those children we bring into the world after they are here as we do before they arrive.
Posted by: It MATTERS | September 1, 2008 8:17 PM | Report abuse
The federal government ought to promote an anal sex-only curriculum in our schools so that our daughters arrive at the marriage altar at least technically virgins.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 8:16 PM | Report abuse
"Have all of you forgotten about John Edwards love child which was covered up for 2 and 1/2 years? Edwards wife is dying of cancer. The left, who has NO morals of any kind is so quick to condemn those who do. Obama believes that a baby is 'punishment' to a girl and should be murdered.
What hypocrisy,"
if this is the best you can do then you should just forfeit now. There is no comparison..none..you can keep trying but your efforts will be fruitless. Just realize your candidate is an idiot and your party is going down the tubes. Even rats abandon a sinking ship. good luck
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 8:15 PM | Report abuse
In her statement, Palin writes, "We're proud of Bristol's decision to have her baby and even prouder to become grandparents." But Sarah Palin's daughter, Bristol never had a "decision" to make, since she and her mother believe there is no alternative to an unplanned pregnancy than to carry the baby to term. And, if it were up to Palin and McCain, no woman in the country who faces an unwanted pregnancy (or the birth of a child with Down syndrome) would be left to decide for herself either.
Posted by: Yankee Liberal | September 1, 2008 8:14 PM | Report abuse
I thought that was soooo funny, too, when Obama asked about Alaska's entrance ranking in the US. 56th? 57th? 58th? Which states are the 51st through 55th?
Posted by: tootie | September 1, 2008 8:12 PM | Report abuse
As long as John McCain is not the father, I will still vote for him. Or will I?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 8:11 PM | Report abuse
Oh... premarital sex among minors is OK! And of course, they should be making babies as long as they get married! Palin's PTA membership is a sorry excuse for horrible parenting.
And the Christian right celebrates this and covers it with requests for privacy? Bristol is now in league with Britany Spears sister! Lousy example and lousy parenting.
Posted by: Silent Thunder | September 1, 2008 8:11 PM | Report abuse
While candidate's children are not fair game, if little Trig is actually Bristol's daughter (Bristol! Why didn't they name her Philadelphia? But I digress...)
If Trig is Bristol's daughter then Ms. Moroni, I mean Ms. Palin has been lying to everyone.
Posted by: Fair is fair | September 1, 2008 8:10 PM | Report abuse
Have all of you forgotten about John Edwards love child which was covered up for 2 and 1/2 years? Edwards wife is dying of cancer. The left, who has NO morals of any kind is so quick to condemn those who do. Obama believes that a baby is 'punishment' to a girl and should be murdered.
What hypocrisy,
Posted by: Lorry1 | September 1, 2008 8:09 PM | Report abuse
Maybe Sarah Palin should have concluded the abstenance lecture with a few warning shots over the head.
Posted by: Charlton Heston | September 1, 2008 8:09 PM | Report abuse
The baby daddy is Levi Johnston of Wasila, Alaska. He's a senior in high school and a hockey player. I guess There will be two "hockey moms" in the family now.
Justin, you rock! I almost fell out of my chair!!
Republican D-I-S-A-S-T-E-R!!
Posted by: slind | September 1, 2008 8:08 PM | Report abuse
Ok, time for round two!
Hey, it is so EXCITING to be in the company of SO MANY pure, moral male and female virgins! I musta died and gone to heaven with all of the precious "saints" who have commented on here!
Posted by: Pinky Tharp | September 1, 2008 8:08 PM | Report abuse
Obama to an advisor, "Was Alaska the 56th or 57th state admitted to the union?"
Posted by: A question from Obama | September 1, 2008 8:07 PM | Report abuse
My biggest problem with the Bristol pregnancy is it is fair game for the MSM. Because of Sarah Palin's political views it should be fair game.
Sarah Palin is a supporter of abstinence-only education, yet she cannot teach that lesson in her own household. Obviously, this approach is flawed, and for many others less fortunate than Bristol the right to choose is fundamental.
Sarah Palin would take away education that helps others less fortunate than Bristol because of her religious beliefs. It's also possible that she is forcing her daughter into this decions to protect her political career. If she doesn't support the right to choose these assumptions can and should be made.
I hope the so-called liberal media doesn't drop the ball on this. It is relevant and deserves discussion because it's hypocrisy at its highest.
Posted by: Shannon B. | September 1, 2008 8:07 PM | Report abuse
In this case this is not about Bristol herself, but it is a referendum on the failure of abstinence only programmes. They simply do not work.
Furthermore candidates' children are not fair game. They have nothing to do with how the candidate will govern.
Teen-pregnancies happen because a large number of teenagers do not have the appropriate information about reproduction and how to prevent getting pregnant. I do not recall the statistics, but since Bush has made abstinence-only a cornerstone of his presidency, teenage pregnancies increased.
It is not fair to promote abstinence only. Let's face it some teenagers have sex. To reduce the number of pregnancies give them the education they need to prevent them from ruining their futures.
If Bristol had, had sex ed we probably would not be having this conversation. She is fortunate to have loving parents.
Lastly on the other hand, if Bristol all of a sudden miscarries it will raise doubts about who really gave birth to Trig. Into her 6th or 7th month of "pregnancy" Sarah Palin was walking around in 3" heels. That is unheard of.
See here (fast forward to 5:30 minutes):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C21HdCJKM60&feature=related
See here also:
http://www.politicalbase.com/profile/jnail/blog/&blogId=3422
To clear up any doubts Palin needs to provide her medical records.
So let's leave Bristol out of it. Children are off-limits. This is a referendum on abstinence only and whether Sarah Palin has used good judgment and if she has been forthcoming.
Posted by: serena1313 | September 1, 2008 8:05 PM | Report abuse
I predict IF Obama is elected President he will be a one term president and will go down as one of the worst presidents in US history. He'll make Jimmy Carter look freakin' brilliant!
Posted by: crystal ball | September 1, 2008 8:05 PM | Report abuse
Palin is a disaster!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 8:04 PM | Report abuse
Polls have Obama and McCain dead even or within 1 to 2 points. So much for that boost the Annointed One was suppose to get after the convention.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 8:04 PM | Report abuse
The baby daddy is Levi Johnston of Wasila, Alaska. He's a senior in high school and a hockey player. I guess There will be two "hockey moms" in the family now.
http://www.frontiersman.com/articles/2008/01/15/sports/doc478c411e72a8d457315639.txt
Posted by: Justin | September 1, 2008 8:03 PM | Report abuse
Sorry, but I see most teenage pregnancies as a lame excuse for poor parenting and neglect. As a PTA-soccer mother of a 15 year old daughter (a total of three girls), a key parenting responsibility is to know that my daughter is safe and limit her exposure to risk if I believe her maturity doesn’t reflect sound judgment, nor the life skills to protect herself.Undoubtedly, having the child is the right thing, but who was coaching the daughter before she started dating on the responsibility of respecting herself, and family, by behaving accordingly. What mother would take an eight hour flight (as Sarah did),with a high risk pregnancy, in labor to give birth in AK? What mother of 5 would take on a position she's not even sure what the job description requires of herself, at the cost of her family? What mother of a special needs infant (which the daughter is always holding) would take on such demanding positions? This is very contradictory...
This evangelical “she’s living the pro-life” choice is hogwash. It’s just another “Oops, I did it again, luckily I am forgiven,” irresponsible, hypocritical behavior from a reckless politician that is selling herself on a false premise..…Let's just say, she stays out of my personal business-I will stay out of hers...
Posted by: Parental accountability | September 1, 2008 8:02 PM | Report abuse
The Palin statement that she was disclosing her child's pregnancy to quell rumors about the child's [alleged] earlier pregnancy does not make any sense. It is game of distraction.
Palin's statement implies that if her child is five-months pregnant now (if that is even true), she could not have given birth in April 2008. But of course that doesn't follow at all. It just means we are dealing with back to back pregnancies of the child [allegedly].
This is an attempt at distraction from Palin's hoax regarding the first pregnancy of the child, which Palin falsely claimed as her own pregnancy [allegedly].
The press is focusing on the second pregnancy (which isn't much of an issue beyond that fact Palin concealed it from the campaign until now) to avoid reporting on the real story: the elaborate [alleged] hoax surrounding the first pregnancy of the child.
This is an important story, as newsworthy as Palin's abuse of power in trying to get her brother in law fired and then firing his boss when he wouldn't follow her illegal orders.
The Obama campaign has asked the press to stand down on this story. The American people, however, want the press to stand up. The so-called mainstream press has no excuse not to cover it. It's no wonder they are losing circulation and ratings.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 8:02 PM | Report abuse
If Palin's family has so much christian values as she claims, why didn't her church instill the right values in her teenage daughter? If Palin couldn't teach her daughter to keep her legs together, and she couldn't find any other intelligent human beings to teach Bristol the right christian values how do you expect Palin to make any decisions for this country? If Palin was running on a liberal ticket as a democrat, this may all sound fine. But she is running on a conservative platform with so much emphasis put on family values. This is the party of veep Dan Quayle who critized a TV show called Murphy Brown for having a kid out of wedlock. Now we have a veep candidate who has taught her teenage daughter it is okay not only to have a baby out of wedlock but also when you are a teenager. Talk about double standards here.
The question is it responsible for America to ask Palin to take care the business of this country or let her take care of her own two children with special needs, her 4 month old with down syndrome and 17 year old who could really use some help from her mom during the early years of rearing a baby. McCain still has time to make the right decision by letting Palin go and take of her family instead of dragging her around the country. He still has the other candidates from his short list that he can enlist. The republican party elders should really ask McCain to reconsider another person for the job. It is never too late.
Posted by: John McCormick | September 1, 2008 8:01 PM | Report abuse
"the pregnancy is of no consequence and nobody's business. This includes you. "
Oh I beg to differ Bill, this is my business! Palin says one thing and then does another. Humm I wonder where she learned that from?? The way she runs her family is a direct correlation to the way she would run the country. Her "family values" are in question concerning this unwed, underage, irresponsible pregnancy. Now because of her ignorant belief system her child is going to become a statistic.. She will most likely divorce due to marring to young. Not to mention attending college with a child and having to hold down a job and a home etc.etc.
Palin's irresponsibility and lack of judgment concerning this issue is frightening!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 8:01 PM | Report abuse
Wow, these comments are horrendous. You know, it's easier to take jabs at other people's personal lives when you are not under the public microscope yourself.
Pathetic.
Posted by: Grueschenka | September 1, 2008 8:01 PM | Report abuse
So McCain knew Bristol was pregnant. And yet he still went forward with Sarah Palin's nomination?
Regardless of how you feel about the pregnancy itself, it says a lot about McCain that he would do this. Surely he must have known that by putting Gov. Palin's name into the national spotlight, he would be exposing an innocent minor to intense national scrutiny and judgment. He would be telling the world, not just the relatively small enclave of Alaska, that this girl obviously had premarital sex. He would be opening up a whole Pandora's box of whether a conservative upbringing really does make one either unable or unwilling to use birth control effectively. (Never mind abortion: What, exactly, ARE Gov. Palin's views on the use of contraceptives by minors? That will be a HUGE issue in the aftermath of this.) He would be putting additional physical and emotional stress on a young girl during her first pregnancy. And of course, he would be exposing Bristol to, in some Christianist corners at least, public condemnation for her "sinful" ways.
From another angle: What kind of message does the whole Bristol situation send to America's youth? That premarital sex between minors really is okay? That if you do pregnant, you don't need to worry--the guy is going to marry you and everything will work out fine? (Side question: Is it technically a shotgun marriage if the groom is being forced at gunpoint by Secret Service guys with Glocks rather than a daddy with a 12-gauge?) Not only that, but you get to live a fairy-tale existence with your parents in a huge pretty mansion. (Nevermind that the VP lives at the National Observatory grounds rather than the White House; such a distinction will be lost on the average 15-year-old.) The underlying impression will ultimately be that for a young girl, pregnancy (via premarital sex) is the road to wedded happiness.
And, on a more personal note, how long can Bristol's marriage last when its every detail will be on display ad nauseam, thanks to our media-obsessed nation? Is this in any way fair to Bristol and her future husband, not to mention the baby?
As I've said from the start, it all goes back to the question of McCain's character. (Although, to be fair, Gov. Palin now seems to be totally lacking in character as well, putting her ambitions ahead of her daughter's need for a "normal" life at this critical time.) Since McCain knew in advance about Bristol's pregnancy and couldn't see what a firestorm it was bound to cause, it just points once again to his total lack of sound judgment. Or, far more damning, he DID realize that Bristol's life would be made fodder for the grist mill and thought the sacrifice was justified.
McCain is either fatally inept or cynically ruthless. Either way, he's not fit for this country's highest office.
Posted by: whatmeregsiter | September 1, 2008 8:01 PM | Report abuse
McCain just crapped all over your values platform.
Posted by: MsAnna | September 1, 2008 8:00 PM | Report abuse
When people on this site throw around the word "retard" like they do it just shows me how small minded they are. Calling someone a "retard" is the equivalent of calling someone the N-word.
Posted by: Stop with the R word | September 1, 2008 8:00 PM | Report abuse
The Palin baby daddy already has one son named Cooper. Now, he'll have two children. He's 25! I love the Republicans. Jesus would be so proud!
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=7775827
Posted by: Justin | September 1, 2008 7:59 PM | Report abuse
NEWS FLASH
NBC and ABC REPORT MCCAIN CAMP IS RE-VETTING SARAH.
A TEAM OF 10-LEFT FOR ALASKA THIS AFTERNOON.
McCain looks like a fool!!!
Posted by: Bob North Smithfield | September 1, 2008 7:58 PM | Report abuse
We can all agree that the press SHOULD leave stories like this alone. We also can agree that it is beyond foolish to think they will. Sort of like hoping Democrats and Republicans could come together to balance the budget. Nice sentiment. Ain't going to happen.
This is a disaster for the McCain campaign. It looks like they didn't vet the choice. It looks like his biggest decision in this race just backfired. And in politics, perception is everything.
Not to mention the timing overshadows what is already an overshadowed convention.
Better question -- if the McCain camp KNEW about this, why did they announce today? Was this their original plan, or did something cause them to push the announcement up to today?
Posted by: David | September 1, 2008 7:58 PM | Report abuse
I vote to spray and fumigate this site because it has really become so infested with vermin.
Posted by: votehillary | September 1, 2008 7:57 PM | Report abuse
Wow. Just when you thought the Obama people couldn't possible get any trashier, they decide to out the opposition's teenage daughter.
Even Richard Nixon would blush.
Posted by: Wooster | September 1, 2008 7:54 PM | Report abuse
If Sarah Palin has done such a poor job of rearing her daughter, and based on the religious rights approach to religion, I would have to conclude that being unmarried, 17, and having a child would qualify as "having done a poor job" of rearing her daughter, what can we expect as vp, more os the same? McSame/Palin
Posted by: message in a bottle | September 1, 2008 7:53 PM | Report abuse
I believe women can be good leaders. I believe women can work a full time job and still be a good mother. I also think it's possible that Sarah Palin can be a good mayor of a small town and be a good mother of four. It is also very likely that she is a good governor of a sparsely populated state and be a good mother of four with a fifth on the way and a pregnant teenage daughter. But I think the Vice President of the United States (and someone next in line for the Presidency) takes a lot more time and commitment than a mother of five and soon-to-be grandmother can afford to withhold from her family. In four or eight years she could be a forceful candidate for VP, but now is not the time for Sarah Palin. Good for her for showing that women can be mothers and politicians, good for her for standing by her daughter and supporting her decision to keep the baby, but shame on her for thinking she can put her family's life on the back burner while she pursues her own aspirations. Her family needs her more than ever right now and the best decision for her to make is to step aside and ask McCain to pick someone else.
Posted by: Jessica S | September 1, 2008 7:53 PM | Report abuse
OK; I've posted some outrageous things here, but the Republicans are THE party of outrage.
They've trashed our country, made it look ludicrous and worse in the eyes of the world.
Enough. No more Republican-initiated destruction of America.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 7:50 PM | Report abuse
Who's the baby-daddy?
Posted by: RightRepub | September 1, 2008 7:50 PM | Report abuse
The spelling on here stinks!!!!!
Posted by: pinky | September 1, 2008 7:49 PM | Report abuse
Instead of going through the glass ceiling, Palin crashed through the glass floor and landed in the glass toilet.
Posted by: Richard | September 1, 2008 7:48 PM | Report abuse
I vote to spay and neuter.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 7:48 PM | Report abuse
Children not only learn what they live, they live what they learn. This child apparently has been given the responsibility of parenting her sibling as her mother's responsibility of politics overshadows her own parenting responsibility. Bristol Palin should have no qualms about becoming a parent to her own biological child as her responsibilities for her brother(?) Trig, which should have been her mother's responsibility, makes it alright for her to be a parent instead of being a teen.
A mother who states that she is proud to be a grandparent when her teen daughter is pregnant, is in denial that something went wrong. It appears that she endorses the premature marriage of this young couple. Statistics show that young marriages tend to end up in divorce. Really, the values of family are muddled in politics.
Sure her mother is anti-abortion, but being pro-responsibility is a stronger value, as that includes prevention (including abstinence as an option) and responsible decision making. When this value is upheld, the issue of abortion is moot. What do pro-life groups do beyond protesting abortion and encouraging the destruction of family planning clinics and physicians. Regarding the parents who are not ready, willing or able to support and parent their children and end up abusing or neglecting their children, how much energy is placed by pro life people on the care of these existing lives. Leave it to the government? I suppose if that is the case, then the government should control the morals and individual rights of citizens.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 7:46 PM | Report abuse
Why Sarah Palin want the VP job: She needs the benfit of free daycare provided by the Secret Service!
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 7:46 PM | Report abuse
For a different Party, or under other circumstances, this might be much less of a problem than it is. But John McCain is following an administration whose first impulse was to lie to the American People, or stonewall them, or try to keep secret things that they might find embarrassing. John has had his VP nominee for just 96 hours and the stories, counterstories, calls of "Trust Us." and "It isn't any of the public's business." and in general a willingness to hide facts that cannot be hidden, and hope nobody finds out.
More of the Bush Cheney attitude from a Party that has already forfeited the public's trust.
John MIGHT get back on the right foot IF Sarah Palin immediately resigns, citing bad judgment in accepting the nomination in the first place, given her circumastances, which she feels should be left private by the press. Since she is asking us to let her replace the darkl Lord himself, it is NOT a fair request.
ONLY a completely honest, open, and forthright McCain campaign deserves any trust at all. An administration that starts out without the trust of the people is just four more years of George, which we can't abide.
Palin should resign, and John should apologize. Otherwise John should be deemed untrustworthy for his demonstrated bad judgment.
No trust, no chance.
Posted by: ceflynline@msn.com | September 1, 2008 7:44 PM | Report abuse
Actually, some cretins may like nasal sex better, like, say, Michael?????
Posted by: chichibufombo | September 1, 2008 7:42 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "There are two legitimate issues here: (1) Did the McCain Campaign know about this before hand? If they didn't then it'sd another sign that they didn't vet ther or she kept the information to herself (or most probably, Bristol kept it to herself) If they did, why didn't they release the information when they picked her? (2) Why did she accept if she knew it would bring this firestorm of publicity on her family (and particularly her daughter)?"
Yes, according to the news reports, Palin told McCain about the pregnance of her daughter when he was interviewing her. He and she accepted it, because she is much more accomplished than Obama or Hillary and the pregnancy is of no consequence and nobody's business. This includes you.
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 7:42 PM | Report abuse
Sarah Palin is a liar. She claims to have reformed Alaska pork barrel politics by stopping the Bridge to Nowhere. But she never tells you that Alaska kept the money anyway.
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN3125537020080901
Posted by: corridorg4 | September 1, 2008 7:41 PM | Report abuse
Why didn't Sarah teach Bristol that if you only have anal sex, not only can you not get pregnant, but you're also still a virgin!
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 7:40 PM | Report abuse
Michael Blaine
Good GOP tactics of attacking, then can we all can claim to be victims!!
Posted by: CoolReuplica | September 1, 2008 7:39 PM | Report abuse
No Liar, there will be NO moratorium. This goes to the heart of the republican party and their so called "values". When you through rocks through a "glass ceiling" you can expect that something is going to break!! We will take this country back come hell or high water from the right-wing so-called "moral conservative" neocons. Republicans, you are to blame for your own fate! Americans believe in justice and a government who does as they wish. Don't worry we'll play Tapps on your way OUT!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 7:38 PM | Report abuse
No Liar, there will be NO moratorium. This goes to the heart of the republican party and their so called "values". When you through rocks through a "glass ceiling" you can expect that something is going to break!! We will take this country back come hell or high water from the right-wing so-called "moral conservative" neocons. Republicans, you are to blame for your own fate! Americans believe in justice and a government who does as they wish. Don't worry we'll play Tapps on your way OUT!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 7:37 PM | Report abuse
KathyLibbey:
What is rude is these Republicans making a mockery of our government.
With "leaders" like these, I figure it's open season on the comment boards, no?
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 7:37 PM | Report abuse
==============
Bristol Palin is NOT the candidate.
The press has gone all National Enquirer on his running mate’s pregnant teenage daughter, Bristol. Is there no shame? This is not even an 18 year old we are talking either, here. A little common decency, people? Can someone call a moratorium?
http://thetownliar.blogspot.com/2008/09/bristol-palin-is-not-candidate.html
Posted by: thetownliar | September 1, 2008 7:22 PM
==================
Thanks for the thoughtful post. None of these are candidates either and have much more remote relationship:
Wright
Ayers
Rezko
Britney Spears
Female white models/prostitutes
It is unconscionable that people make such FILTHY and flimsy associations.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 7:36 PM | Report abuse
Gee, what politically correct vernacular, Michael --- "mentally retarded baby"???
Wow! My super fave Dem lady Maria Schwarzenegger will LOVE that one! See, folks, those Dem males really know how to win the hearts of us gals!
Posted by: hilary | September 1, 2008 7:36 PM | Report abuse
No Liar, there will be NO moratorium. This goes to the heart of the republican party and their so called "values". When you through rocks through a "glass ceiling" you can expect that something is going to break!! We will take this country back come hell or high water from the right-wing so-called "moral conservative" neocons. Republicans, you are to blame for your own fate! Americans believe in justice and a government who does as they wish. Don't worry we'll play Tapps on your way OUT!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 7:36 PM | Report abuse
Obviously, the Palin girls/women are real hellcats in the sack!
Who said Republicans aren't sexy?!!
At the White House, First Gentleman of the USA Todd can talk about the sexual proclivities of Sarah, and President Sarkozy can talk about those of Carla Bruni.
Hot!
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 7:35 PM | Report abuse
I type fast and don't use spell checks. That was an odd mistake though. The letters are no close to each other on the keyboard.
--------
"fish BATE"???? I always thought it was "fish BAIT."
Posted by: tootie | September 1, 2008 7:29 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 7:35 PM | Report abuse
Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you devour widows’ houses, and for a pretense, make long prayers. Therefore you will receive greater condemnation.
“Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you travel land and sea to win one proselyte, and when he is won, you make him twice as much a son of hell as yourselves.”
— Jesus Christ, Matthew 23: 14-15
Focus on the Family founder James Dobson-hypocrite of the highest order. Hypocrites beware Jesus is watching.
Posted by: Message in a bottle | September 1, 2008 7:35 PM | Report abuse
The following is a link to the Mat Sur Hospitals birth registry.
Trig Palin was born on April 18, 2008 at this hospital according to Gov. Palin but neither Trig's name or her name is listed.
For a small hospital not to put the governors child on there which would obviously be a great honor is surprising, but you can judge for yourself.
http://www.matsuregional.com/nursery/nursery_name.php?start=60&step=30&count=503
Posted by: Patrick | September 1, 2008 7:34 PM | Report abuse
Michael Blaine either you are a republican trying to make people think you are a democrat, or you are just plain rude, and I doubt anyone here with a brain cares what your views are.
Posted by: KathyLibbey | September 1, 2008 7:33 PM | Report abuse
Barack Obama's statement on Sara Palin's daughter's pregnancy was full of class, empathy, and was right on target. He spoke as a father and son of a teenage mother in a way that transcended partisanship. His statement demonstrates to me just how classy a candidate can be even as his own "supporters" (who knows WHO writes the anonymous garbage on this and other blogs)behave as poorly reared adolescents left alone in a lockerroom with an internet connection and with no parental supervision.
Posted by: Scott | September 1, 2008 7:32 PM | Report abuse
Will Paris Hilton and Bristol Palin market their pre-marital sex videos together? As soon as she's 18, Bristol can name her own price in the San Fernando porn industry! God Bless The USA!
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 7:31 PM | Report abuse
Locals up there are not speculating on who the father is. She doesn't seem to have a steady boyfriend. The father could be anybody. Someone she was with once. What are they going to do get her a fake father?
========
So, Bristol Palin "will" marry the father of her unborn child. Well, I wonder if the Social Conservatives have given any thought to the possibility that the father will not want to marry Bristol."
Well, since it is all over the news in black and white that the father will marry her, that sort of makes you look like you haven't read anything about this but have become an "expert".
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 7:27 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 7:31 PM | Report abuse
There are two legitimate issues here: (1) Did the McCain Campaign know about this before hand? If they didn't then it'sd another sign that they didn't vet ther or she kept the information to herself (or most probably, Bristol kept it to herself) If they did, why didn't they release the information when they picked her? (2) Why did she accept if she knew it would bring this firestorm of publicity on her family (and particularly her daughter)?
Posted by: Bald Eagle | September 1, 2008 7:31 PM | Report abuse
Palin/McCain,
Dear Candidates, I am a strong evangelical, and I am asking you two to resign. You two exemplify everything I teach my Christian kids not-to-be. First McCain is near "F" student (5th from bottom) an unfaithful man in marriage -- cheated on his wife, then marries the rich mistress. Then, he is prone to fits of rage/sin that Gal 5:19 tells us to avoid.
On a social level McCain overlooked the civil rights movement voting against the MLK Holiday - and Palin goes to an all white church.
In addition you elevate a woman to lead over very qualified men like Romney and others for a mother who is doing such a poor job at it her teen girls are getting pregnant and involving themselves in pre-maritial sex.
For the Love of God why should we lift you up as a model pair to lead?
Posted by: Mike, Raleigh NC | September 1, 2008 7:30 PM | Report abuse
Was she RAPED??
Where is the offender?
I am curious does Obama consider Bristol Palin's baby a punishment like he would if it was one of his daughters?
Posted by: Mother30's ish | September 1, 2008 1:24 PM
Posted by: Confused | September 1, 2008 7:29 PM | Report abuse
"fish BATE"???? I always thought it was "fish BAIT."
Posted by: tootie | September 1, 2008 7:29 PM | Report abuse
Michael Blaine, I won't answer any more of your dribblings, but I would suggest that you get mental help.
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 7:29 PM | Report abuse
With the Palin girls/women in the White House there'll be more sex occurring there than ever before in American history!
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 7:28 PM | Report abuse
So, Bristol Palin "will" marry the father of her unborn child. Well, I wonder if the Social Conservatives have given any thought to the possibility that the father will not want to marry Bristol."
Well, since it is all over the news in black and white that the father will marry her, that sort of makes you look like you haven't read anything about this but have become an "expert".
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 7:27 PM | Report abuse
I have a feeling Todd will be the next Billy Carter. Maybe he can have his own beer named after him? Or maybe some kind of fish bate or something.
---------
Bill Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar"
Exactly! He had a good intellect and was an expert on the issues. (What he did with his penis was his personal business.)
But, has Palin ever read a book?
Plus, imagine Palin becomes president; the nation's First Gentleman would be named Todd. Todd! "Oh, hello President Sarkozy, I'd like you to meet Todd. Why don't you two discuss stagflation for a few minutes while I go tend to my mentally retarded baby and make sure my daughters aren't screwing in the Lincoln Bedroom." Hah! Hilarious.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 7:18 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 7:26 PM | Report abuse
I can't say that I am happy that another teenage mom is entering this world, but I am grateful that God has shown her that life is more important than anything. You should preach abstinence, which is the only way to certainly prevent an unwanted pregnancy. You can teach your children about the importance of waiting. I am appauled that media, especially Wolf Blitzer, would use this unfortunate incident to push his personal agenda!!! How shameful. I am so proud that Governor Pallin did not back away from this situation. She is one tough cookie. She is the kind of woman America needs. John McCain should be applauded for his choice. If you want to investigate someone, investigate Obama and his background. I am sure you will find some news to report!
Posted by: Danelle P | September 1, 2008 7:24 PM | Report abuse
Whatever, and then there is this:
Quote: "The Berg lawsuit contends there is enough truth in the various reports to conclude, "Unfortunately, Obama is not a 'natural born' citizen."
The suit alleges that while records exist of a "registry of birth" for Obama in Hawaii (filed four days after his claimed birthday), no records exist of his mother's stay in any Hawaii hospital, suggesting she may have given birth elsewhere and filed the registration shortly thereafter on American soil.
"Obama's grandmother on his father's side, half brother and half sister claim Obama was born in Kenya," the suit states. "Reports reflect Obama's mother went to Kenya during her pregnancy; however, she was prevented from boarding a flight from Kenya to Hawaii at her late stage of pregnancy, which apparently was a normal restriction to avoid births during a flight. Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama) gave birth to Obama in Kenya, after which she flew to Hawaii and registered Obama's birth."
The claim could not be verified by WND inquiries to Hawaiian hospitals, since state law bars the hospitals from releasing medical records to the public.
Even if Obama produced authenticated proof of his birth in Hawaii, however, the suit claims that the U.S. Nationality Act of 1940 provided that minors lose their American citizenship when their parents expatriate. Since Obama's mother married an Indonesian citizen and moved to Indonesia, the suit claims, she forfeited both her and Barack's American citizenship."
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 7:24 PM | Report abuse
Michael Blaine I don't like Sarah Palin, but I believe I like you even less. That was uncalled for!
Posted by: KathyLibbey | September 1, 2008 7:23 PM | Report abuse
Bristol Palin is NOT the candidate.
The press has gone all National Enquirer on his running mate’s pregnant teenage daughter, Bristol. Is there no shame? This is not even an 18 year old we are talking either, here. A little common decency, people? Can someone call a moratorium?
http://thetownliar.blogspot.com/2008/09/bristol-palin-is-not-candidate.html
Posted by: thetownliar | September 1, 2008 7:22 PM | Report abuse
God Bless The USA And Our Future First Gentleman "Todd"!
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 7:21 PM | Report abuse
So, Bristol Palin "will" marry the father of her unborn child. Well, I wonder if the Social Conservatives have given any thought to the possibility that the father will not want to marry Bristol. Of course, since Bristol is not due to give birth until after the election, this really doesn't matter to a lying bunch of hypocritical right-wing nut jobs. The G.O.P. spin machine is running on high right now pumping out lie after lie for consumption by the American people. There are so many lies that are flooding the Internet from Republicans that I'll bet people around the world are laughing their heads off at us, and wondering if we will buy this pile of G.O.P. feces. I won't. But, I don't know how many of my fellow citizens I can count on to do the same thing. The Founding Fathers concept of an "educated electorate" flew out the window long ago in this country. Obama/Biden 08!!!
Posted by: caliguy55 | September 1, 2008 7:21 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: mike hawk | September 1, 2008 7:19 PM | Report abuse
As a woman who had a baby when I was 17, because I was looking for the love, approval, and acceptance that was lacking in my family life, I can feel for what this young girl is going through. That is why it makes me angry at Governor Palin for putting her teenage daughter in this position. She had to of known that this would come out, and that it would be made into a public ordeal, when she accepted the position.
I believe Palin's claims of having strong family values are bull, and that she is self serving and self consumed. That is why she has no problem taking a position that would give the responsibility of raising her children to someone else. I also can't help but dislike this woman because it seems she is using the fact that she has an infant son with Down syndrome, to get sympathy votes. If the child means so much to her then why would she consider taking a position that will require her to be away from him so much? She gets no sympathy from me. It is hard to raise a Down syndrome child. Let her run after she, not someone else has raised the child, that would mean something.
Posted by: KathyLibbey | September 1, 2008 7:19 PM | Report abuse
I can't believe how many people here are so judgmental. Sarah Palin has her views. Those are her views. I don't recall her forcing her views on others. Just because she has a belief system that is different than others, no need to criticize. So her daughter got pregnant. She is dealing with it. Hypocritical would be for her to force her daughter to have a secret abortion to cover all of this up. She told McCain that her daughter was pregnant. It did not affect his decision. Eventually, it would have become public. Afterall, the young woman will give birth in a few months. It came out today because of the false rumors going around that Palin faked her pregnancy to cover her daughter's. And there are many here claiming that it is still the case and that the daughter got pregnant again. Unbelievable. And I still cannot believe the comments about how wrong it is for a woman to become pregnant after the age of 35. Will the first law that President Obama sign is the tying of tubes of all women over 35? Or that any woman pregnant over 35 must abort her child? I have plenty of friends in their late 30's, some in their early 40's blessed by God with the birth of a child. Regardless of age, it is still a blessing. But some of you do not see it that way. Perhaps you should question if it was a blessing for your mothers.
Posted by: Anthony | September 1, 2008 7:19 PM | Report abuse
"Bill Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar"
Exactly! He had a good intellect and was an expert on the issues. (What he did with his penis was his personal business.)
But, has Palin ever read a book?
Plus, imagine Palin becomes president; the nation's First Gentleman would be named Todd. Todd! "Oh, hello President Sarkozy, I'd like you to meet Todd. Why don't you two discuss stagflation for a few minutes while I go tend to my mentally retarded baby and make sure my daughters aren't screwing in the Lincoln Bedroom." Hah! Hilarious.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 7:18 PM | Report abuse
Liberal = Democrats So when Obama is aware of this kind of behavior and doesn't shut it down, he has a certain amount of accountability.
From reading the blogs, the Post must be home to the liberal also.
For its readers seem to loving that the Post gave them this opportunity to regurgitate the swill they eat at the trough.
Posted by: anotherview | September 1, 2008 7:18 PM | Report abuse
Yes the beltway media is desperate to make the pitch fork yielding morality police into victim after they are exposed as hypocrites.
Posted by: TexDem | September 1, 2008 7:18 PM | Report abuse
Sarah Palin's family situation, while interesting, isn't the issue here. However, Palin's take on contraception, education, women's rights, and sex ed are key. We shouldn't be asking her about her daughter, but rather what she thinks schools should be teaching. Teen pregnancy IS a real and unfortunately problem -- it curtails opportunities for education and economic advancement -- and health education that promotes many forms of contraception, including but not limited to abstinence, is an important part of the solution.
Posted by: Let's Talk Issues | September 1, 2008 7:18 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "Oh, goody! I LOVE all of these "clever" wordplays. Here's mine:
Joe "I'm just" Biden my time, until Hill and Bill can bump off the big O like they did Ron Brown
Now, let's all take out our marbles and play!"
You may not have to wait too long, his plane has already had the emergency ramp open "mysteriously" while in flight.
"Unbeknownst to the pilot, an emergency evacuation slide had inflated inside the tail of the jet, affecting control cables there."
Stranger things happened during their administration.
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 7:17 PM | Report abuse
If this happened today they would spin it as "It's a good thing, it will bring public awareness to mental health to have a VP who is nuts".
----------
Posters seem VERY interested in this story,and they take sides; accuse hypocrisy or defend privacy according to which side they support.
I would only suggest: Eagleton redux.
google it.
Posted by: Kev in NC | September 1, 2008 7:13 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 7:17 PM | Report abuse
LOL!!! Come on Republicans... You can do better than this...Can't you? Maybe not.
Well look at the bright side... you can bet on getting the Jerry Springer demographic.. Oh wait... that's right...already in the bank aren't they. Oh yea there's always the pedo...oh you already have that one too.. Ok I give up. Maybe the bright side is that the baby is white?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 7:15 PM | Report abuse
Catholic girls are even MORE easy! But bring some penicillin.
Posted by: jojo | September 1, 2008 7:14 PM | Report abuse
I think she has her nickname now. By the way, is it true Mccain told her she could put her double wide on the back lawn of the white house?
--------
Vote for John Sidney "Songbird" McCain III and Sarah "Trailer Trash" Palin in '08!
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 7:10 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 7:13 PM | Report abuse
Posters seem VERY interested in this story,and they take sides; accuse hypocrisy or defend privacy according to which side they support.
I would only suggest: Eagleton redux.
google it.
Posted by: Kev in NC | September 1, 2008 7:13 PM | Report abuse
I havent heard one lie yet about the girls pregnancy. It was private but it came out and the family said yes she's pregnant. What lie?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 7:13 PM | Report abuse
This is an insult to Republicans who truly care about their families. What true Republican mother would abandon her infant son and her pregnant daughter in such a family crisis to go on an ego trip like this. WAKE UP GOP!! It's not too late!! Pick Mitt Romney who is not a hypocrite and truly cares about family values!!
Posted by: richard | September 1, 2008 7:12 PM | Report abuse
One thing about Democrats is they love love love is bashing women for every reason under the sun. The treatment that Hillary received is now just being transferred to Palin. The prejudice and discrimination in all the remarks are sickening.
Reading the media reports and all these comments makes my conviction certain - I will be voting for McCain/Palin in 08!
Posted by: McCain Democrat | September 1, 2008 7:11 PM | Report abuse
And John Mccain is the real father of Bristols baby.
----------
Obama is not a US citizen so his Kenyan family says! His Kenyan Aunt says she was the midwife and delivered the baby in Kenya. Obama release direct access to Hawaii's department of human statistics for your birth records!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 7:09 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 7:11 PM | Report abuse
Here's the difference between a Democrat who's had a scandal, and a Republican who has:
Quote: "Frank graduated from Harvard College and is an expert in high finance.
Palin went to some third-rate school and believes the Earth is only 5,000 years old.
One can contribute something substantial to governance, the other ought to go back to the trailer park and continue reading TV Guide."
Michael, I gave you credit for being smarter than that. You believe education makes right?? Bill Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar, and that didn't give him morals, did it??
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 7:11 PM | Report abuse
Actually, Bill, Michael is really a poot, more than a hoot. A hoot might be an owl, as in wise, but a poot is, uh . . .
Posted by: chichibufombo | September 1, 2008 7:10 PM | Report abuse
Vote for John Sidney "Songbird" McCain III and Sarah "Trailer Trash" Palin in '08!
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 7:10 PM | Report abuse
She should have the choice. She doesn't need the government telling here what to do.
You can spin and twist this however you want the truth is, they wanted to lie to us. I don't for one second believe Mccain knew. He would have to be as big an idiot as many of us think to pick her if he knew.
---------
I would like to make one thing clear. The Obama belief is not to punish the girl for her mistake she should abort it!
Posted by: B. Obama | September 1, 2008 7:02 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 7:09 PM | Report abuse
Obama is not a US citizen so his Kenyan family says! His Kenyan Aunt says she was the midwife and delivered the baby in Kenya. Obama release direct access to Hawaii's department of human statistics for your birth records!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 7:09 PM | Report abuse
Republican girls are easy!
Ask one to prom!! (But bring your own condom.)
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 7:08 PM | Report abuse
Boy, when it rains...it pours doesn't it?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 7:07 PM | Report abuse
"Palin's support for abstinence only sex ed, her belief in no exceptions if raped",...if this is true, Palin is a hypocrite. I agree with" stubby."...this is an unfortunate example of irresponsibility presented to our young people by a daughter of a vice presidential candidate.
..heaven help us! what a fine example of abstinence only sex education.
Posted by: nahiku888 | September 1, 2008 7:07 PM | Report abuse
Oh, goody! I LOVE all of these "clever" wordplays. Here's mine:
Joe "I'm just" Biden my time, until Hill and Bill can bump off the big O like they did Ron Brown
Now, let's all take out our marbles and play!
Posted by: tootie | September 1, 2008 7:07 PM | Report abuse
Maybe Governor Palin's daughter is more like her mom than we thought.
Indications are that Sarah Palin may have had a similar pregnancy. She sure got married in a hurry and delivered her first child less than 8 months after eloping.
http://scootmandubious.blogspot.com/2008/09/like-mother-like-daughter.html
Posted by: scootmandubious | September 1, 2008 7:06 PM | Report abuse
How can Sarah Palin run this country when she couldnt even keep her daughters legs closed?
Posted by: MirrorMirror | September 1, 2008 6:55
*******************
Do you really want to go there? See Obama's mother did the same thing when she was a teen except Barry's father was married at the time and not to his mother! Furthermore most teens are sexually active at this age, if you think your children are not then you have your head in the sand!
Posted by: Really? | September 1, 2008 7:06 PM | Report abuse
I heard the father of the baby is African American.
Posted by: MirrorMirror | September 1, 2008 7:05 PM | Report abuse
Palin should release Trig's birth certificate. It doesn't add up that she is the mother of Trig. A woman in the latter stages of a pregnancy, especially with a special needs child, getting on a plane for a 10+ hour flight after her water has broken? Why not stay put?
She didn't show at all during Trig's supposed pregnancy (take a look at the pictures on the below links) while she was noticeably pregnant with her other pregnancies. Her daughter being out of school for 5 months prior with mono seems like strange timing. Release the birth certificate to close the matter!
Sarah during pregnancy of child 1 - 4:
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/1083892/Sarah-Palin-Pregnant-with-Track-Palin-in-1989
Sarah during Trig's supposed pregnancy:
http://alaskapodshow.com/index.php/2008/08/30/sarah-palin-pregnancy-scandal/
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 7:05 PM | Report abuse
Michael, you are a hoot, a stupid one, but still a hoot.
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 7:05 PM | Report abuse
John Sidney McCain III graduated 894 out of a college class of 899.
If that didn't have you convinced, his selection of Palin shows he's too stupid to be president.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 7:04 PM | Report abuse
As an art historian, I can help remark that in the photo associated with this article, the daughter holding the baby bottle looks like Mona Lisa.
Posted by: frederick2 | September 1, 2008 7:03 PM | Report abuse
What is important about Gov Palin are the following:
1. She is from a state that apparently has a lot of corrupt Republican officials in it.
2. Her main claim to her current job is that she is good at catching corrupt Repbulican officials or at least standing up to them.
3. Is that enough for us to make her Vice President?
Posted by: Nana | September 1, 2008 7:02 PM | Report abuse
I would like to make one thing clear. The Obama belief is not to punish the girl for her mistake she should abort it!
Posted by: B. Obama | September 1, 2008 7:02 PM | Report abuse
Consider this statement at the end of Palin's initial (to non-Alaskans) introductory biography: "Bristol Palin is 5 months pregnant. We ask for and expect the public's grace and prayers for our family as we live through this private issue." Finished. That does it. You may say that the statement shouldn't be neccessary or relevant, but then get real. By precipitating this circus, the McCain campaign botched it. McCain selected Palin in order to bring in a voting block that will critically look at Palin's work-home makeup, and this baggage-hiding experiment ends predictably.
Posted by: hangtango | September 1, 2008 7:02 PM | Report abuse
BTW, Michael, I have no allegiance to any party. In my state, you do not register in any party. You vote in the primary by party, and then vote however you wish in the general election. And there are several million voters eligible to vote in my state.
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 7:02 PM | Report abuse
The only surprise so far id that the Republicans haven't blamed the pregnancy on an Obama campaign worker. Their hypocitical bleating abt the revelations are laughable. If this were Obama or Biden's 17 yrold, Rush, Sean, Bill and the boys would be in full roar over liberals lacking morals, and how it shows that if they can't control their families, how could they be trusted with running the nation. The Democrats are NOT the ones with the abstinence only, head in the sand platform plank.
And now we find she was for the Bridge to Nowhere before she was against it, and Ms. I'm a Reformer heads up a group for Ted Stevens, the Boss Tweed of the Senate. I admire the Obama campaign's restraint, but screw 'em. The Republican posturing about theselves as the paradigm of values is just excrement flung in the air, and they have the chutzpah to lecture us daily on our morality? Private or not, she should be blasted daily until she quits; this is politics, not Sunday school
Posted by: bklyndan | September 1, 2008 7:01 PM | Report abuse
Where there's smoke , there's fire.
This whole episode stinks to high heaven.
Someone is doing some serious lying here.
The daughter was supposed to have been hidden at home for 6 months too sick from 'mono' to attend school??
Now they claim she became pregnant conveniently at the same time her mother was supposed to have given birth to the 'Down Syndrome' baby??
Is this new baby real, or a treacherous trick?
Posted by: chasemonster | September 1, 2008 7:00 PM | Report abuse
Should we forget about the Joe Biden scandel that has not been put out in MSM.
Larry Sinclair has accused Obama of partaking with Larry, Cocain use and gay oral sex between the two. Sen. Biden's son, Atty.Gen. Joe Biden of Delaware drew up arrest warrents for fraud. Larry was arrested when he had to attend the State of Delaware to clear the matter up. He needed to clear the matter up because Sen. Joe Biden had contacted the social security administration and had Larry's disability benefits turned off. Hmmm, now you see the tangled web of deceipt between Obama-Biden!!!
Posted by: jane fondu | September 1, 2008 6:59 PM | Report abuse
DON'T GO TO veeppeek.com -- someone is spamming that site all over the comments for this article. The site really sucks.
Posted by: DONT_GO_THERE | September 1, 2008 6:59 PM | Report abuse
Sarah Palin needs to rethink her archaic position on birth control and teaching "abstinance only" in schools. Had she been more open to these ideas in the first place maybe her 17 year old daughter would not be in this difficult position. Can't wait for her debate with Joey! It should be a good show, to say the least!
Posted by: Jenn | September 1, 2008 6:59 PM | Report abuse
Chris, The pregnancy will have an impact and for the most part it will be negative. However, just as the Clinton supporters, the McCain supporters have no place to go. They will either stay home in November or they will hold their noses and vote. The rest is just talk talk.
Posted by: frederick2 | September 1, 2008 6:59 PM | Report abuse
One more time - sure, the Democrats have done many a sleazy thing. But one prime difference: Unlike Palin and her born-again claque, most of the errant Dems didn't wave Jesus in our faces, decry other people's sex lives, and want the government to dictate what we can and can't do with our own bodies. It's one thing to send your maid out to buy opiates; it's another to blowhardishly denounce drugs dealers while doing so, right Rush?
It ain't the heat, it's the hypocrisy.
Posted by: mishi | September 1, 2008 6:59 PM | Report abuse
Chris,
What is concerning here - and what the media needs to concentrate on - is what this says about Senator McCain's decision making skills. Was she fully vetted? She couldn't have been. This was a rash, last-minute decision that reflects poorly on Senator McCain. I don't want this in a POTUS.
Posted by: Mary14 | September 1, 2008 6:58 PM | Report abuse
Mike In Atlanta:
Glad you shared your priorities; here are the Republicans':
1. Money;
2. Money;
3. Control;
4. Money;
5. Keeping the masses ignorant.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 6:58 PM | Report abuse
I hope that "Nancy H." simply is a poor writer. If she truly means that a mother of a "special needs child" is "an insult to soccer moms", etc., then I have a gigantic bone to pick with her. An entire skeleton-full of bones to pick, in fact.
Posted by: AWC | September 1, 2008 6:58 PM | Report abuse
http://bettybowers.com/betty4president/
Candidate for “Vice” President Sarah Palin has finally fessed up that her unmarried teenage daughter has been running around town having unprotected sex. Truly, the Lord Jesus is showing us two things by this sad example of teenage harlotry:
1. That a mother who also engages in sexual activity outside of a traditional, Christian marriage (if you doubt this, check out the birthday of Sarah’s first son — April 20, 1989 — and the date she and her handsome hubby eloped — August 29, 1988!) sets an appalling example for her own children. Indeed, studies from Focus on the Family have proven that harlot mothers wind up with harlot daughters 93.4% of the time. Similar studies by the godly gals at Concerned Women for America have concluded that these poor, impressionable girls learn to strut, show inappropriate décolletage and beguile like pushy prostitutes in their very own living rooms.
2. And a mother who values her career (to the point of abandoning a newborn to campaign 24-7 for a new job in another state) above raising her precious family should not be surprised when she FINALLY steps back inside her family home (if she remembers the address) to find that it has been filled with bastards in her shocking absence!
And, honestly, what is happening to our once-godly country when REPUBLICANS are getting all giddy over a unrepentant harlot? I expect Demoncrats to go for that nonsense, but not the party of God. Please join me in praying to the Lord Jesus that Mr. McCain kick this trash to the curb!
Posted by: BettyBowers4Prez | September 1, 2008 6:57 PM | Report abuse
Sarah Palin needs to rethink her archaic position on birth control and teaching "abstinance only" in schools. Had she been more open to these ideas in the first place maybe her 17 year old daughter would not be in this difficult position. Can't wait for her debate with Joey! It should be a good show, to say the least!
Posted by: Jen | September 1, 2008 6:57 PM | Report abuse
Where there's smoke , there's fire.
This whole episode stinks to high heaven.
Someone is doing some serious lying here.
The daughter was supposed to have been hidden at home for 6 months too sick from 'mono' to attend school??
Now they claim she became pregnant conveniently at the same time her mother was supposed to have given birth to the 'Down Syndrome' baby??
Is this new baby real, or a treacherous trick?
Posted by: chasemonster | September 1, 2008 6:57 PM | Report abuse
Don't put this on the democrats or Obama. He is not responsible for any of this. Please do some research before you post. Obama is one of the primary individuals urging media outlets not to go after Palin or the "child" on this development. He himself has revealed his mother had him at 18. Come on now, lets not spin this. I agree with the do as I say not as I do politics of republicans. Give Obama credit for once again taking the high road.
Posted by: Queen | September 1, 2008 6:57 PM | Report abuse
It's been reported that the baby's father name is Levi (no last given). Palin needs to make some tough decisions and quick. Republicans are gasping for air Palin is becoming a Pa*in in the elephant's butt!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:56 PM | Report abuse
We challenge Fox News to open up their comments section for all articles without censorship. Some articles we can't comment on. We also challenge Bill Kristol and Karl Rove to write articles where we can response to them and not hide behind the conservative media or the New York Times articles where we can't post. Don't brother posting here Karl. We will meet you in the future if you accept this challenge you write your articles where we can response!
Posted by: Andrew | September 1, 2008 6:56 PM | Report abuse
Don't forget the REAL issue in this announcement:
The parents throwing their daughter under the bus to quell rumors about whether the mom's newest child was really hers or her daughter's.
Why else announce it now, esp. if they, as they claim, want privacy? Nobody was asking if the daughter is pregnant NOW. They were asking if she was pregnant THEN.
So, to get out in front of the story by saying she's pregnant NOW ....
Wow.
Please don't be fooled into thinking this announcement is any kind of answer.
It was a NON-answer to the original question: Did Sarah really give birth to Trig?
Notice how that question could easily have been answered directly without throwing the daughter under the bus.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:56 PM | Report abuse
I'm glad someone brought up Barney Frank.
Here's the difference between a Democrat who's had a scandal, and a Republican who has:
Frank graduated from Harvard College and is an expert in high finance.
Palin went to some third-rate school and believes the Earth is only 5,000 years old.
One can contribute something substantial to governance, the other ought to go back to the trailer park and continue reading TV Guide.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 6:55 PM | Report abuse
Wow Jimmy thanks for the link to the http://www.veeppeek.com Those Pictures are hallarious., Ha Ha. I think we should leave the youngster alone.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:55 PM | Report abuse
How can Sarah Palin run this country when she couldnt even keep her daughters legs closed?
Posted by: MirrorMirror | September 1, 2008 6:55 PM | Report abuse
And another thing: since when did Republicans, like Hitler and Stalin, believe in country first? Is this China or the USA?
Here's the way a REAL man lives:
1. God.
2. Family.
3. Country.
Do NOT mix up that order. God, family, country. No exceptions.
Posted by: Mike of Atlanta | September 1, 2008 6:54 PM | Report abuse
Michael, you had better take a reading comprehension course. You listed the scandals of the Republicans and I in turn listed a portion of the scandals of the democrats. So if you don't care about the democrats, list their scandals as well as the republicans.
And as for my allegiance, I am voting as any thinking voters will do this year, Libertarian.
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 6:54 PM | Report abuse
Are all of the Anonymous posters on here related? And what happened to the spellcheck function? Grammar appears to be defunct, too.
Posted by: chichibufombo | September 1, 2008 6:52 PM | Report abuse
Please don't tell me that evangelicals care about the character flaws of those who are promoting their policies. They will support McCain even though he ran around on his wife because she was disfigured in an accident, and finally married a rich trophy wife who won out among all the other mistresses. Why do you think they would care about a mere teenage pregnancy followed by a shotgun marriage?
Posted by: mccain's floozies | September 1, 2008 6:52 PM | Report abuse
The way the Palin family is exploiting daughter Bristol Palin is abominable. It reflects the parents' values. Sarah Palin is against sex-education in schools and, obviously, is against sex-education at home. She presents herself as a pious, pro-life evangelical willing to keep a Down syndrome baby which may very well belong to her daughter. This new pregnancy may be one to cover the previous one; time will uncover who knows what other lies.
Her piety, however, doesn't extend to animals: in 2007, this pious creationist paid hunters to kill wolves in order to secure larger herds of moose and caribou. The wolves had no right to be wolves. She, as governor, rewarded those brave shooters with $150 for each wolf's front right paw they consigned to the Department of Fish and Game as proof of their bravery. No wonder her favorite gourmet meal is moose stew from moose she shoots herself. Luckily, for the wolves and for decency sake, the courts stopped those barbaric killings.
She wants to eventually declare in her state, and possibly even nationally, the illegality of abortion. The evangelical nuts love her and are energized more than ever. Not since George Bush declared Jesus as his favorite philosopher has there been such frenzied devotion for a political candidate. Medieval McCain, who would love to appoint justices who would repeal Roe vs. Wade, would have no objection to have abortions return to back-alleys. After all, McCain the genius, who graduated fifth from the bottom of his Naval Academy class, knows for sure that life begins at conception; he stated so without blinking to Rev. Warren not too long ago to the infinite applause of the congregation.
Now Gov. Palin lawyers up for her legal troubles in Alaska that are just beginning to turn into a circus of buffoons and religious nuts the entire Repubblican party. When asked by Rev. Warren what was his worst moral failure, "honest" McCain indicated his divorcing his first wife. He didn't say what he did to her and how he treated that poor woman. Divorces are a reality for many Americans and they are not necessarily a moral failure. Divorces among evangelicals are legion! What he should have mentioned as his worst moral failure is having helped, as a member of the infamous Keating Five, banker Keating steal billions from innocent bank customers who lost their life savings. He and the other thieves got paid very well for that. When asked, McCain simply blamed it to bad judgment. For less than that, people are incarcerated for twenty-thirty years.
McCain and Palin are two peas in a pod, a pod that should be thrown in the garbage just like their extreme Right Wing ideas. America deserves better! Could they talk, I wonder what the wolves, moose, and caribou would say about all this!
Posted by: JoeG. | September 1, 2008 6:52 PM | Report abuse
I am a Patriot.
And I am sick and tired of the Republicans embarrassing my country over and over again.
Get out of politics, you Republican fools.
This is really too much to bear.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 6:52 PM | Report abuse
Shouldn't she be in the home, taking care of her kids and serving her husband? Isn't that what conservatives think?
Is she putting a career ahead of her family?
Is that okay with conservatives?
McCain should simply say, "Look, Sarah, your family needs you now. Go home."
And then he can get Mitt or someone who truly can pay attention to what needs attention.
Sarah Palin needs to quit and go home to her family. It's time to be a mother, a real mother and wife.
Posted by: Mike of Atlanta | September 1, 2008 6:51 PM | Report abuse
Face it, McCain lied about the vetting process and Palin lied to McCain. Way to go. Country first.
Posted by: anthonyafterwit | September 1, 2008 6:51 PM | Report abuse
What, is Todd Palin some kind of pimp?
He couldn't keep the jackals away from his teenage daughter?
Well, the joke's on the Palins now! Daughter's impregnated, and Mom's unemployed!
Go back to the trailer park, white trash!
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 6:50 PM | Report abuse
Here is my take for what it's worth:
What about the daughter? In my view it was Sarah Palin's primary responsibility to protect her daughter. And it seems to me that if I were asked to run for a National office I might think it would destroy my daughter's privacy and place her on the front page of every newspaper in the US and a good bit of the world, and I would say 'NO'. So to me it becomes a question of judgment that ultimately runs to her character and it is my belief that she let her blind ambition stand in the way of her parental responsibility. So the argument that this is a private family matter has no substance since by her decision to run she fostered it becoming very public. This is particularly true in that while she said it was private, she went on to assure that her daughter would marry the man. If it was private she should have left it at that and not continued on the marriage bit. The only possible reason would be to appeal to some in her constituency. This also gets to her judgment; her daughter is a teen with her whole life before her. Wouldn't it be better for her to counsel her daughter to wait on a wedding until she is mature enough to make the decision after the baby is born? I also wonder about the age disparity between Bristol and the father which leads one to question where Sarah was all that time. Twenty three versus fourteen and twenty six versus seventeen?
Posted by: clarkw | September 1, 2008 6:50 PM | Report abuse
Face it, McCain lied, Palin Misled. Country first?
Posted by: anthonyafterwit | September 1, 2008 6:49 PM | Report abuse
Mucho Thanks, Bill, for posting that great and exciting lengthy lineup of fabulous Dem Scandals! Poor Michael! Twice dumped by Barney Frank!
Posted by: chichibufombo | September 1, 2008 6:49 PM | Report abuse
Apparently Palin is McCain's "Soulmate" I'm supposing that McCains' soul is not doing so well now. Maybe McSoulmate should find an AK47 and let off some steam?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:49 PM | Report abuse
Sarah Pallin is making the wacky 1972 Eagleton pick look like genius.
Pallin's unwed 17-year-old daughter is pregnant?
She retained a lawyer to defend herself in an alledged abuse of power case?
This makes Bill Clinton's Whitewater scandal look silly.
Maybe Pallin can go and kill a moose or something. Geez.
Posted by: Oh Please7 | September 1, 2008 6:48 PM | Report abuse
Listen, I don't care about Palin's granddaughter. Millions of families deal with this.
What is funny is the Republican reaction. To everything!! It goes:
- It's OK that we did it
- Democrats do the same thing
As Obama said, own up to your failures.
Even though I don't consider this one.
Posted by: Wow | September 1, 2008 6:48 PM | Report abuse
Please Washington Post erase all posts containing offensive comments and links.
Please Washington Post readers who are posting here do not do this anymore.
At a certain point tonight I catched myself for the first time posting one and I truly regretted it immediately after clicking.
Is true indeed, that these blogs are beginning to get complete revulsing at reading, and this type of behaviour isn't even Christian at all.
Thank God we are a people of humans, not dogs barking at each other.
Both tickets adress issues that we are confronting right now, and since we are not able to judge individuals as we'll ALL be alone facing ourselves when the time comes, since we're not to tell the future, let's compare what they have to offer in terms of policies, and the best will win this race.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:47 PM | Report abuse
I agree with some of the posts regarding how dems need to tread lightly. Obama has been subjected to critical analysis, everything from his early drug use, his wifes speeches, his birth certificate, his school in India, where his wife works, his neighbors, people who served on boards with him, etc, etc.
And now we should tread lightly. Thats that 2004 wimp stuff. It's 08, we learned our lesson about taking the higher road, and got swift boated.
The dems are running against career distortion artist, lets not think that being nice here is prudent, McCain, not Palin, needs to be held to account for making this ridiculous pick. If we don't make it known how ridiculous it is, people will never now, because its like yours will never be courageous enough to call a spade a spade.
Posted by: Big B | September 1, 2008 6:47 PM | Report abuse
I am a Patriot.
And I am sick and tired of the Republicans embarrassing my country over and over again.
Get out of politics, you Republican fools.
This is really too much to bear.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 6:47 PM | Report abuse
Please Washington Post erase all posts containing offensive comments and links.
Please Washington Post readers who are posting here do not do this anymore.
At a certain point tonight I catched myself for the first time posting one myself and I truly regretted it immediately after clicking.
Is true indeed, that this blogs are beginning to be complete revulsing, and this type of behaviour isn't even Christian at all.
Thank God we are a people of humans, not dogs barking at each other.
Both tickets adress issues that we are confronting right now, and since we are not able to judge indivuals as we ALL will be alone facing ourselves when the time comes, since we're not to tell the future, let's compare what they have to offer in terms of policies, and the best will win this race.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:45 PM | Report abuse
I like Palin, Her kid gettin pregnant just shows that she has to deal with the same stuff as the rest of us. There are other scandals with her that hold more wieght you can see them at http://www.veeppeek.com
Posted by: Jimmy | September 1, 2008 6:44 PM | Report abuse
What is so wrong with adoption?
There is not a 17 year old in this country today mature enough to marry and raise a child in an emotionally healthy and viable home. Our nation regularly post statistics on the outcome of children and marriages of teenage parents.
Bristol Palin's pregnancy is no longer a private matter. High schools treat teenage pregnancies as epidemics, they sight high profile celebrity unwed pregnancies as the instigators of these “epidemics”. Truly, truly are we so “party line” obsessed in this country to deny the fact that the 17 year old daughter of the Vice President doesn’t lend themselves to status of role model?
THE WRONG PRO-LIFE DECISION HAS BEEN ENCOURAGED FOR BRISTOL PALIN. If the Palin’s are so very pro-life, then they should be willing to make the hard pro-life decision and support their daughter. Adoption is a selfless giving of life to an unexpected pregnancy. Adoption is the affirmation that God has an intent and purpose for every single conception. Young girls and women who give their children up for adoption are heroes. When are the right wing conservatives going to promote a pro-life campaign of that nature. Sure adoption is hard on the birth mother, excruciating and seemingly impossible to the mind of anyone who has wanted a child or had a child and experienced the great joy of bringing the child home. But, there are consequences to indescrection and wrong choices and a mature teenage mother and her family should want to find the best parents, for their child, who are mature and know themselves and absolutely without fear and reservation desire a child of their own.
Posted by: age | September 1, 2008 6:43 PM | Report abuse
Obama supporters... Sit back, shut your mouths and let this thing do its own self destructing.
Palin was obviously a bad and irresponsible choice. The facts supporting this are working their way to the surface. The hypocrisy, impracticality and datedness of the christian conservative movement has never been more apparent.
By the way everybody, guys and gals...we're different. Always have been and always will be. Get over it.
Posted by: Andrew | September 1, 2008 6:43 PM | Report abuse
you know, if I were running for office and had a daughter that was a teenager, she'd be wearing a chastity belt right about now...
Posted by: word to the wise | September 1, 2008 6:42 PM | Report abuse
Bill:
Do you know how to read?
I DON'T CARE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATS!
I am asking for one measly example of what the Republicans know how to do properly on behalf of our country.
You got nothing.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 6:42 PM | Report abuse
This will be an interesting week.
Is McCain just like Bush?
Is he going to say something smart about 'being the decider' and then refuse to even consider that he made a huge blunder?
We shall see.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:41 PM | Report abuse
See? No one reads these posts.
--"Uhmmm, who cares? Could somebody please explain to me why this is news, or even a topic that recieves any publicity what so ever?
Posted by: rcupps | September 1, 2008 6:27 PM "--
Let's start with the issue that despite the evidence before us that 'abstinence education' doesn't work - it's still the policy of many people. Palin would rather promote a broken policy than one that works. How's that for a VP candidate? What other policy's does she know won't work but she continues to promotes anyway?
The policy issues that bear on this issue that come to my mind are:
* Sex education in schools.
* Access to contraceptives for school kids.
* Welfare for teenage mothers.
And the fact that Evangelicals will keep on telling people what to, which is fine - until it crosses into policy. The Republican's first choice seems to be self-delusion - when they can't ignore the fact that their policy's are harming the country. That’s worth talking about.
Posted by: NoOneImportant | September 1, 2008 6:40 PM | Report abuse
I am so proud to be an American! Only in America could an election for such an important position become so entertaining.
Posted by: KathyLibbey | September 1, 2008 6:40 PM | Report abuse
The Republicans can no longer ignore the fact that abstinance only doesn't work even in there own families. Gov Palin is lucky to have the resources to help her child through this but many don't. Maybe this will help change some policy decisions about sex ed with the Republicans.
Posted by: Laura | September 1, 2008 6:39 PM | Report abuse
So let me get this straight and who exactly her shows ANY resposible judgement?
Palin KNEW her underage daughter was pregnant but accepted the nomination for VP anyway?
Either-
She thought is could be hidden
or
Exposing her family to what is sure to be instense scrutiny is somehow worth the potential Political gain?
As for McCain?
They state he was aware of this- we then can assume McCain was also aware of the current ethics invetigation against Palin in Alaska- for starters.
Who in their right mind would select someone with these potential issues ?????
America deserved better than this- much batter!
Posted by: JdFla | September 1, 2008 6:39 PM | Report abuse
I am a Patriot.
And I am sick and tired of the Republicans embarrassing my country over and over again.
Get out of politics, you Republican fools.
This is really too much to bear.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 6:39 PM | Report abuse
Oh well, Michael, you forced me to post a few of the over 200,000 pages on google:
List of the democratic scandals:
William Jefferson Clinton- Impeached by the House of Representatives over allegations of perjury and obstruction of justice, but acquitted by the Senate. Scandals include Whitewater - Travelgate Gennifer Flowersgate - Filegate - Vince Fostergate - Whitewater Billing Recordsgate - Paula Jonesgate- Lincoln Bedroomgate - Donations from Convicted Drug and Weapons Dealersgate - Lippogate - Chinagate - The Lewinsky Affair - Perjury and Jobs for Lewinskygate - Kathleen Willeygate - Web Hubbell Prison Phone Callgate - Selling Military Technology to the Chinesegate - Jaunita Broaddrick Gate - Lootergate - Pardongate
Edward Moore Kennedy - Democrat - U. S. Senator from Massachusetts. Pleaded guilty to leaving the scene of an accident, after his car plunged off a bridge on Chappaquiddick Island killing passenger Mary Jo Kopechne.
Barney Frank - Democrat - U.S. Representative from Massachusetts from 1981 to present. Admitted to having paid Stephen L. Gobie, a male prostitute, for sex and subsequently hiring Gobie as his personal assistant. Gobie used the congressman's Washington apartment for prostitution. A move to expel Frank from the House of Representatives failed and a motion to censure him failed.
DNC - The Federal Election Commission imposed $719,000 in fines against participants in the 1996 Democratic Party fundraising scandals involving contributions from China, Korea and other foreign sources. The Federal Election Commission said it decided to drop cases against contributors of more than $3 million in illegal DNC contributions because the respondents left the country or the corporations are defunct.
Sandy Berger - Democrat - National Security Advisor during the Clinton Administration. Berger became the focus of a criminal investigation after removing highly classified terrorism documents and handwritten notes from the National Archives during preparations for the Sept. 11 commission hearings.
Robert Torricelli - Democrat - Withdrew from the 2002 Senate race with less than 30 days before the election because of controversy over personal gifts he took from a major campaign donor and questions about campaign donations from 1996.
James McGreevey - Democrat - New Jersey Governor . Admitted to having a gay affair. Resigned after allegations of sexual harassment, rumors of being blackmailed on top of fundraising investigations and indictments.
Jesse Jackson - Democrat - Democratic candidate for President. Admitted to having an extramarital affair and fathering a illegitimate child.
Gary Condit - Democrat - US Democratic Congressman from California. Condit had an affair with an intern. Condit, covered up the affair and lied to police after she went missing. No charges were ever filed against Condit. Her remains were discovered in a Washington DC park..
Eliot Spitzer- Democrat - New York governor - resigned from office after being tied to a prostitution ring.
Sowande Ajumoke Omokunde - Democrat - the son of newly elected U.S. Rep. Gwen Moore, was booked on charges of criminal damage to property for allegedly slashing tires on 20 vans and cars rented by the Republican Party for use in Election Day voter turnout efforts.
Daniel David Rostenkowski - Democrat - U.S. Representative from Illinois from 1959 to 1995. Indicted on 17 felony charges- pleaded guilty to two counts of misuse of public funds and sentenced to seventeen months in federal prison.
Melvin Jay Reynolds - U.S. Representative from Illinois from 1993 to 1995. Convicted on sexual misconduct and obstruction of justice charges and sentenced to five years in prison.
Charles Coles Diggs, Jr. - Democrat - U.S. Representative from Michigan from 1955 to 1980. Convicted on eleven counts of mail fraud and filing false payroll forms- sentenced to three years in prison.
George Rogers - Democrat - Massachusetts State House of Representatives from 1965 to 1970. M000ember of Massachusetts State Senate from 1975 to 1978. Convicted of bribery in 1978 and sentenced to two years in prison.
Don Siegelman - Democrat Governor Alabama - indicted in a bid-rigging scheme involving a maternity-care program. The charges accused Siegelman and his former chief of staff of helping Tuscaloosa physician Phillip Bobo rig bids. Siegelman was accused of moving $550,000 from the state education budget to the State Fire College in Tuscaloosa so Bobo could use the money to pay off a competitor for a state contract for maternity care.
John Murtha, Jr. - Democrat - U.S. Representative from Pennsylvania. Implicated in the Abscam sting, in which FBI agents impersonating Arab businessmen offered bribes to political figures; Murtha was cited as an unindicted co-conspirator
Gerry Eastman Studds - Democrat - U.S. Representative from Massachusetts from 1973 to 1997. The first openly gay member of Congress. Censured by the House of Representatives for having sexual relations with a teenage House page.
James C. Green - Democrat - North Carolina State House of Representatives from 1961 to 1977. Charged with accepting a bribe from an undercover FBI agent, but was acquitted. Convicted of tax evasion in 1997.
Frederick Richmond - Democrat - U.S. Representative from New York from 1975 to 1982. Arrested in Washington, D.C., in 1978 for soliciting sex from a minor and from an undercover police officer - pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor. Also - charged with tax evasion, marijuana possession, and improper payments to a federal employee - pleaded guilty.
Raymond Lederer - Democrat - U.S. Representative from Pennsylvania from 1977 to 1981. Implicated in the Abscam sting - convicted of bribery and sentenced to three years in prison and fined $20,000.
Harrison Arlington Williams, Jr. - Democrat - U.S. Senator from New Jersey from 1959 to 1970. Implicated in the Abscam sting. Allegedly accepted an 18% interest in a titanium mine. Convicted of nine counts of bribery, conspiracy, receiving an unlawful gratuity, conflict of interest, and interstate travel in aid of racketeering. Sentenced to three years in prison and fined $50,000.
Frank Thompson, Jr. - Democrat - U.S. Representative from New Jersey from 1955 to 1980. Implicated in the Abscam sting, convicted on bribery and conspiracy charges. Sentenced to three years in prison
Michael Joseph Myers - Democrat - U.S. Representative from Pennsylvania from 1976 to 1980. Implicated in the Abscam sting - convicted of bribery and conspiracy; sentenced to three years in prison and fined $20,000; expelled from the House of Representatives on October 2, 1980.
John Michael Murphy - Democrat - U.S. Representative from New York from 1963 to 1981. Implicated in the Abscam sting. Convicted of conspiracy, conflict of interest, and accepting an illegal gratuity. Sentenced to three years in prison and fined $20,000.
John Wilson Jenrette, Jr - Democrat - U.S. Representative from South Carolina from 1975 to 1980. Implicated in the Abscam sting. Convicted on bribery and conspiracy charges and sentenced to prison
Neil Goldschmidt - Democrat - Oregon governor. Admitted to having an illegal sexual relationship with a 14-year-old teenager while he was serving as Mayor of Portland.
Alcee Lamar Hastings - Democrat - U.S. Representative from Florida. Impeached and removed from office as federal judge in 1989 over bribery charges.
Marion Barry - Democrat - mayor of Washington, D.C., from 1979 to 1991 and again from 1995 to 1999. Convicted of cocaine possession after being caught on videotape smoking crack cocaine. Sentenced to six months in prison.
Mario Biaggi - Democrat - U.S. Representative from New York from 1969 to 1988. Indicted on federal charges that he had accepted bribes in return for influence on federal contracts.Convicted of obstructing justice and accepting illegal gratuities. Tried in 1988 on federal racketeering charges and convicted on 15 felony counts.
Lee Alexander - Democrat - Mayor of Syracuse, N.Y. from 1970 to 1985. Was indicted over a $1.5 million kickback scandal. Pleaded guilty to racketeering and tax evasion charges. Served six years in prison.
Bill Campbell - Democrat - Mayor of Atlanta. Indicted and charged with fraud over claims he accepted improper payments from contractors seeking city contracts.
Frank Ballance - Democrat - Congressman North Carolina. Pleaded guilty to one charge of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and money laundering related to mishandling of money by his charitable foundation.
Hazel O'Leary - Democrat - Secretary of Energy during the Clinton Administration - O'leary took trips all over the world as Secretary with as many 50 staff members and at times rented a plane, which was used by Madonna during her concert tours.
Lafayette Thomas - Democrat - Candidate for Tennessee State House of Representatives in 1954. Sheriff of Davidson County, from 1972 to 1990. Indicted in federal court on 54 counts of abusing his power as sheriff. Pleaded guilty to theft and mail fraud; sentenced to five years in prison.
Mary Rose Oakar - Democrat - U.S. Representative from Ohio from 1977 to 1993. Pleaded guilty to two misdemeanor charges of funneling $16,000 through fake donors.
David Giles - Democrat - candidate for U.S. Representative from Washington in 1986 and 1990. Convicted in June 2000 of child rape.
Gary Siplin - Democrat state senator Florida- found guilty of third-degree grand theft of $5,000 or more, a felony, and using services of employees for his candidacy.
Edward Mezvinsky - Democrat - U.S. Representative from Iowa from 1973 to 1977. Indicted on 56 federal fraud charges.
Lena Swanson - Democrat - Member of Washington State Senate in 1997. Pleaded guilty to charges of soliciting unlawful payments from veterans and former prisoners of war.
Abraham J. Hirschfeld - Democrat - candidate in Democratic primary for U.S. Senator from New York in 1974 and 1976. Offered Paula Jones $1 million to drop her sexual harassment lawsuit against President Bill Clinton. Convicted in 2000 of trying to hire a hit man to kill his business partner.
Henry Cisneros - Democrat - U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development from 1993 to 1997. Pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of lying to the FBI.
James A. Traficant Jr. - Member of House of Representatives from Ohio. Expelled from Congress after being convicted of corruption charges. Sentenced today to eight years in prison for accepting bribes and kickbacks.
John Doug Hays - Democrat - member of Kentucky State Senate from 1980 to 1982 Found guilty of mail fraud for submitting false campaign reports stemming from an unsuccessful run for judge. He was sentenced to six months in prison to be followed by six months of home confinement and three years of probation.
Henry J. Cianfrani - Democrat - Pennsylvania State Senate from 1967 to 1976. Convicted on federal charges of racketeering and mail fraud for padding his Senate payroll. Sentenced to five years in federal prison.
David Hall - Democrat - Governor of Oklahoma from 1971 to 1975. Indicted on extortion and conspiracy charges. Convicted and sentenced to three years in prison.
John A. Celona - Democrat - A former state senator was charged with the three counts of mail fraud. Federal prosecutors accused him of defrauding the state and collecting hundreds of thousands of dollars from CVS Corp. and others while serving in the legislature. Celona has agreed to plead guilty to taking money from the CVS pharmacy chain and other companies that had interest in legislation. Under the deal, Celona agreed to cooperate with investigators. He faces up to five years in federal prison on each of the three counts and a $250,000 fine
Allan Turner Howe - Democrat - U.S. Representative from Utah from 1975 to 1977. Arrested for soliciting a policewoman posing as a prostitute.
Jerry Cosentino - Democrat - Illinois State Treasurer. Pleaded guilty to bank fraud - fined $5,000 and sentenced to nine months home confinement.
Joseph Waggonner Jr. - Democrat - U.S. Representative from Louisiana from 1961 to 19 79. Arrested in Washington, D.C. for soliciting a policewoman posing as a prostitute
Albert G. Bustamante - Democrat - U.S. Representative from Texas from 1985 to 1993. Convicted in 1993 on racketeering and bribery charges and sentenced to prison.
Lawrence Jack Smith - Democrat - U.S. Representative from Florida from 1983 to 1993. Sentenced to three months in federal prison for tax evasion.
David Lee Walters - Democrat - Governor of Oklahoma from 1991 to 1995. Pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor election law violation.
James Guy Tucker, Jr. - Democrat - Governor of Arkansas from 1992 to 1996. Resigned in July 1996 after conviction on federal fraud charges as part of the Whitewater investigation.
Walter Rayford Tucker - Democrat - Mayor of Compton, California from 1991 to 1992; U.S. Representative from California from 1993 to 1995. Sentenced to 27 months in prison for extortion and tax evasion.
William McCuen - Democrat - Secretary of State of Arkansas from 1985 to 1995. Admitted accepting kickbacks from two supporters he gave jobs, and not paying taxes on the money. Admitted to conspiring with a political consultant to split $53,560 embezzled from the state in a sham transaction. He was indicted on corruption charges. Pleaded guilty to felony counts tax evasion and accepting a kickback. Sentenced to 17 years in prison.
Walter Fauntroy - Democrat - Delegate to U.S. Congress from the District of Columbia from 1971 to 1991. Charged in federal court with making false statements on financial disclosure forms. Pleaded guilty to one felony count and sentenced to probation.
Carroll Hubbard, Jr. - Democrat - Kentucky State Senate from 1968 to 1975 and U.S. Representative from Kentucky from 1975 to 1993. Pleaded guilty to conspiring to defraud the Federal Elections Commission and to theft of government property; sentenced to three years in prison.
Joseph Kolter - Democrat - member of Pennsylvania State House of Representatives from 1969 to 1982 and U.S. Representative from Pennsylvania from 1983 to 1993. Indicted by a Federal grand jury on five felony charges of embezzlement at the U.S. House post office. Pleaded guilty.
Webster Hubbell - Democrat - Chief Justice of Arkansas State Supreme Court in 1983. Pleaded guilty to federal mail fraud and tax evasion charges - sentenced to 21 months in prison.
Nicholas Mavroules - Democrat - U.S. Representative from Massachusetts from 1979 to 1993. Pleaded guilty to charges of tax fraud and accepting gratuities while in office.
Carl Christopher Perkins - Democrat - Kentucky State House of Representatives from 1981 to 1984 and U.S. Representative from Kentucky from 1985 to 1993. Pleaded guilty to bank fraud in connection with the House banking scandal. Perkins wrote overdrafts totaling about $300,000. Pleaded guilty to charges of filing false statements with the Federal Election Commission and false financial disclosure reports. Sentenced to 21 months in prison.
Richard Hanna - Democrat - U.S. Representative from California from 1963 to 1974. Received payments of about $200,000 from a Korean businessman in what became known as the "Koreagate" influence buying scandal. Pleaded guilty and sentenced to federal prison.
Angelo Errichetti - Democrat - New Jersey State Senator was sentenced to six years in prison and fined $40,000 for his involvement in Abscam.
Daniel Baugh Brewster - Democrat - U.S. Senator from Maryland. Indicted on charges of accepting illegal gratuity while in Senate.
Thomas Joseph Dodd - Democrat - U.S. Senator from Connecticut. Censured by the Senate for financial improprieties, having diverted $116,000 in campaign and testimonial funds to his own use
Edward Fretwell Prichard, Jr. - Democrat - Delegate to Democratic National Convention from Kentucky. Convicted of vote fraud in federal court in connection with ballot-box stuffing. Served five months in prison.
Jerry Springer - Democrat - Resigned from Cincinnati City Council in 1974 after admitting to paying a prostitute with a personal check, which was found in a police raid on a massage parlor.
Guy Hamilton Jones, Sr. - Democrat -Arkansas State Senate. Convicted on federal tax charges and expelled from the Arkansas Senate.
Daniel Flood - Democrat - U.S. Representative from Pennsylvania from 1945 to 1947, 1949 to 1953 and 1955 to 1980. Pleaded guilty to a conspiracy charge involving payoffs and sentenced to probation.
Otto Kerner, Jr - Democrat - Governor of Illinois from 1961 to 1968. While serving as Governor, he and another official made a gain of over $300,000 in a stock deal. Convicted on 17 counts of bribery, conspiracy, perjury, and related charges. Sentenced to three years in federal prison and fined $50,000.
George Crockett, Jr. - Democrat - U.S. Representative from Michigan. Served four months in federal prison for contempt of court following his defense of a Communist leader on trial for advocating the overthrow of the government.
Cornelius Edward Gallagher - Democrat - U.S. Representative from New Jersey from 1959 to 1973. Indicted on federal charges of income tax evasion, conspiracy, and perjury
Mark B. Jimenez - Democrat fundraiser - sentenced to 27 months in prison on charges of tax evasion and conspiracy to defraud the United States and commit election financing offenses.
Bobby Lee Rush - Democrat - U.S. Representative from Illinois. As a Black Panther, spent six months in prison on a weapons charge.
Bolley ''Bo'' Johnson - Democrat - Former Florida House Speaker - received a two-year term for tax evasion.
Roger L. Green - Democrat - Brooklyn Democrat Assemblyman. Pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor for accepting travel reimbursement for trips he did not pay for and was sentenced to fines and probation.
Gloria Davis - Democrat - Bronx assemblywoman. Pleaded guilty to second-degree bribe-taking.
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 6:39 PM | Report abuse
LOL, thanks for the link Pete http://www.veeppeek.com thats really a funny site., That other link to the image that someone else left., with Palin holding a gun in a bikini.,.... I dont think that is real. That is a photo shop.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:38 PM | Report abuse
Hmmm. "White Trash, Under God." Didn't that originate with Bill Clinton?
Posted by: chichibufombo | September 1, 2008 6:38 PM | Report abuse
Um...Who cares...well how bout all the responsible parents who know where "all" there children are..at all times!!! that's who cares. This woman is a hypocrite and apparently a criminal! We can't have anyone man or woman making decisions on our behalf who can not make good decisions when it comes to his/her family. Palin knew about this before she accepted the offer. As a republican I can not justify voting for McCain/Palin. It goes against everything I've ever believed in. I'm going to stay home in Nov. We'll have to try again in 2012
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:37 PM | Report abuse
The pregnancy in and of itself is not a catastrophe. But the other potential scandals are popping up concerning Palin and they are all worrisome as a group. She clearly was not properly vetted.
Posted by: matt | September 1, 2008 6:37 PM | Report abuse
Bill:
I don't care about the Democrats.
What I'm asking is, "What is one thing the Republicans can do properly?"
If you can't answer, maybe you should find a different allegiance.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 6:37 PM | Report abuse
The scandals surrounding this woman is just begining to surface, she abused her power as Gov and this is the woman to be a heartbeat from Presidency?
She is a fake in every way from not mentioning anything about her daughter and trying hide her daughters pregnancy with a huge blanket holding her new son in pictures.
The American people do not need a fake and hypocrite and someone who will abuse the power of her office in the WH!
We have that now!
Posted by: Dan | September 1, 2008 6:36 PM | Report abuse
Teenagers will be teenagers, regardless of Mom's political convictions. The only thing that befuddles me is that the alleged reason for "revealing" the pregnancy of Palin's oldest child was to dispel the Internet rumors that she was the real mother of Palin's youngest child. But what would the alternative have been had it not been for the rumors circulating?
The daughter will be 7-months pregnant before Election Day. Surely, she will be showing by then. Did they intend to treat her like a sitcom character whose pregnancy is not written into the script, where she would have always had to stand behind counters and grocery bags? Was she going to have another 4-month bout with "mono" to keep her hidden away? They act as though they forced to reveal a family secret, but with the spotlight predictably focused on Palin, people were going to find out.
All of this gossip about her family is irrelevant, though. Her vast foreign policy experience in Alaska-Russia diplomacy more than qualifies her for the job.
Posted by: Palin Comparison | September 1, 2008 6:36 PM | Report abuse
This is just to confirm that Mccain made his choice not because Palin can help the country but because she can get the sympathy of Americans mostly women. The country needs good leaders who can help the economy and all our issues but not leaders who are being to political. Palin is just a Mccain being Political and I am not taking it. Obama is being himself and he didn't try to locate a VP with current family DRAMA but a High profile LEADER. I respect the Palin family but OBAMA ROCKS.....
Sarah 's daughter doesn't need all this, she needs support and not all these criticism.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:35 PM | Report abuse
I see 3 separate people posting that they read on CNN ( I'm presuming on the 'crawl') that the Father of Bristol's baby is a 26 year old pharmacy student at the University of Alaska and that they've been dating for 3 years. I first saw a lot of other people discussing those implications.
Going back through the comments, I notice that all 3 'different' people who claimed to have seen it on CNN worded their posts in exactly the same manner, so that does not bode well for the veracity of the claim. Having Sarah Palin clam right up and demand privacy for the couple doesn't help clear this up either.
Posted by: verifier | September 1, 2008 6:34 PM | Report abuse
The pregnacy of the 17 y.o. is not the issue to me at all, but rather the judgement of Gov Palin and McCain to go ahead with her nomination knowing this child will be put through hell for political expediancy. She should have let this pass, take care of her kids and grandkids finish another 6 years as a popular gov and then enter the national stage as a huge star (presedential material). This is not the kind of judgement I want in my leaders.
Posted by: Rob | September 1, 2008 6:34 PM | Report abuse
Michael, you don't want me to start listing the democratic things of the same nature. The list is looooong.
It works on both sides.
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 6:34 PM | Report abuse
Did I say Senator Palin? I meant Sarah Palin
Posted by: KathyLibbey | September 1, 2008 6:32 PM | Report abuse
Is Sarah the grandmother of the 5 month's old baby? WOW!
Posted by: meche | September 1, 2008 6:32 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "NOT SO LOVED IN ALASKA"
Again, anonymous, your proof. As of today, she has an 86 positive approval rating with the people of Alaska, both democratic and republican. The highest rating of any governor in the nation.
Keep on posting the lies, someone stupid might believe you.
Google it, for proof.
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 6:32 PM | Report abuse
Anyone who remains a Republcan after this fiasco either earns $500,000/year or is so in denial he/she is beyond psychiatric help.
Look at this party: Sex with men in airport bathrooms, sex with teenage male interns, promiscuous teenage daughters, cocaine use, draft dodging, alcoholism, disastrous financial, natural disaster and war management.
Please tell me: Can the Republicans do anything right? I'm listening . . .
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 6:31 PM | Report abuse
I don't understand, did the daughter got pregnant while she was home for 4 months with mono? If she had such a severe case of mono should she really have been having sex?
Posted by: concerned | September 1, 2008 6:31 PM | Report abuse
Who needs experience in foreign policy? http://thebruceblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/palinqueen.jpg?w=400&h=604
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:30 PM | Report abuse
This is a private matter. But would the Religious Right be so accommodating if this was an issue faced by a Democratic candidate?...
Posted by: sevenoaks07 | September 1, 2008 1:59 PM
________________
This is not a private matter when the mother of a 17 year old child is pregnant happens to be running for the White House... This speaks VOLUMES about the Palin's
Posted by: Beth | September 1, 2008 6:30 PM | Report abuse
Senator Palin's daughter isn't the issue. It is Senator Palin' soap opera life, and what happens in the next episode. I just can't wait! This is someone we are suppose to respect and trust. If this woman had the strong family values that she proclaims, then she would not even consider such a demanding position until her children didn't need her quite as much as they do now. Anyone can have a Down syndrome baby and then let someone else raise it. How hard is that?
Posted by: KathyLibbey | September 1, 2008 6:30 PM | Report abuse
Because we have a backwoods barefooted idiot running for VP.
---------
Uhmmm, who cares? Could somebody please explain to me why this is news, or even a topic that recieves any publicity what so ever? We are in a war, the economy is in the tank and we are facing a climatic catastrophy of biblical proportion, yet this is the BS that is newsworthy? C'mon and do your jobs you schmucks. And, please if you think this "newstory" should effect how you vote in Nov., do us all a favor and stay the F#$% at home on election day.
Posted by: rcupps | September 1, 2008 6:27 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:29 PM | Report abuse
Hilarious, and unbelievable. The libs can't get enough of this, DWI's, pregnancys,etc.
They seem to forget Bill Clinton chasing everything in skirts,
Quote: "Women have been charging Bill Clinton with sexual assault since his days as a Rhodes Scholar at Oxford 30 years ago.
A continuing investigation into the President's questionable sexual history reveal incidents that go back as far as Clinton's college days, with more than a dozen women claiming his sexual appetites leave little room for the word ''no.'',
being IMPEACHED for LYING UNDER OATH, being forbidden to practice law in the Supreme and his home state, Hillary being a proven habitual liar, with both under suspicion of no telling what while in the White House. Obama sitting and listening to a preacher "God damning America" for 20 years.
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Clean up the democratic party, before you start on someone else.
But, that's a lot of cleaning!!
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 6:28 PM | Report abuse
I like Palin, Her kid gettin pregnant just shows that she has to deal with the same stuff as the rest of us. There are other scandals with her that hold more wieght you can see them at http://www.veeppeek.com
Posted by: Dann | September 1, 2008 6:28 PM | Report abuse
NOT SO LOVED IN ALASKA
******
ANCHORAGE, Alaska News - Gov. Sarah Palin was for the infamous "Bridge to Nowhere" before she was against it, a change of position the GOP vice presidential running mate ignored Saturday when she bragged about telling Congress "thanks but no thanks" to the pork barrel project.
Federal funds for the $398 million bridge were tacked into an appropriations bill as an earmark, the practice by which members of Congress get special funding for pet projects. Sen. John McCain opposes earmarks as an avenue for pork barrel and special interest spending.
After McCain introduced her as his choice for vice president on the Republican ticket, Palin talked about her reform credentials, and said she stopped the bridge project as part of an effort to end of earmarking in appropriations bills.
The Alaska bridge pushed by Sen. Ted Stevens became a symbol of congressional misuse of tax dollars. It would have connected the town of Ketchikan to an island with 50 residents and an airport on it. Ferries and water taxis serve the island now.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:28 PM | Report abuse
Uhmmm, who cares? Could somebody please explain to me why this is news, or even a topic that recieves any publicity what so ever? We are in a war, the economy is in the tank and we are facing a climatic catastrophy of biblical proportion, yet this is the BS that is newsworthy? C'mon and do your jobs you schmucks. And, please if you think this "newstory" should effect how you vote in Nov., do us all a favor and stay the F#$% at home on election day.
Posted by: rcupps | September 1, 2008 6:27 PM | Report abuse
Funny how people do not want to ask the tough question of Palin, but love to ask Obama everything-wonder why?
Posted by: AbortPill | September 1, 2008 6:27 PM | Report abuse
Eagles daughter, your contribution was the best in this whole mess. Thanks. I'm smiling.
Posted by: catt napp | September 1, 2008 6:27 PM | Report abuse
Palin should authorize spying on her family so that she knwos what happens there.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:26 PM | Report abuse
This pregnancy will embolden our enemies.
With this woman in the White House, NO ONE will take the USA seriously ever again.
"Oh, excuse me President Hu Jintao - Vladimir Putin - Felipe Calderon - I just need to check in on my mentally retarded baby, and make sure my daughters aren't having sex -- again. I'll be right back with you to discuss trade and exchange rates -- missile defense in Poland -- NAFTA and immigration. I AM a serious person. REALLY!"
What a dysfunctional super-joke the Republicans are.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 6:26 PM | Report abuse
The number of Obama voters who think Sarah Palin should stay home "barefoot and pregnant" so to speak because she already has enough to do as a mother is MIND-BOGGLING! Would you have this view if she were a man? Give me a break--the fact she has accomplished what she has is IMPRESSIVE. She can obviously multi-task and make decisions under pressure. It's obviously time for this country to deal with SEXISM and double standards.
__________________________________
No one said stay home barefoot and pregnant, but the v.p. job is not appropriate for her right now. you are delusional if you think this woman can multi-task 5 children, 1 grandchild and the U.S. government! and yes, teenage pregnancy is often a sign of some dysfunction in the family - not always, but sometimes, so she at least needs to take some time for her family and figure it out and get her daughter out of the glaring spotlight of international scrutiny like a loving mother would!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:26 PM | Report abuse
The Republicans can afford to lose an election, especially post-Bush...but they cannot afford the likable trainwreck that is their current VP candidate. This is going to destroy the GOP if they don't take care of business pretty soon.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:26 PM | Report abuse
So all of the "she should stay at home because she's a mom and shouldn't have a career" people here - I assume that you think the same thing about Michele Obama, right? It's selfish of her to be a mom and have a busy career as a high-profile lawyer with demanding hours - ESPECIALLY since Barack isn't staying at home providing them with a parent during the day - as is Palin's spouse. Let's hear it - what say you? I'm dying to hear the disingenuous disinctions.
Posted by: Todor Zhivkov | September 1, 2008 6:25 PM | Report abuse
Daman1 says "Most of America LOVES Palin and what she stands for." Actually, "most of America" hasn't a clue, as shown by the latest CBS/Times poll: "Twenty-two percent have a favorable impression of Palin, 11% have an unfavorable impression." (http://thepage.time.com/more-on-cbs-news-poll-2/). Now, a two-to-one favorable/unfavorable ratio is pretty good, but what these numbers show is that "most of America" doesn't have an opinion. (Oh, Biden's favorable/unfavorable in the same poll is 37/16).
Posted by: DRW | September 1, 2008 6:24 PM | Report abuse
Nothing but a white washed sepulchre this woman and her abstinence only prevention program with creationism! What a fool. I also believe that Trig is not her son, but her grandson. I've decided not to vote Republican this time. From bathrooms in Minneapolis where gay senators tap their toes for bj's to this woman with her horrific facade.
Posted by: Orrie | September 1, 2008 6:24 PM | Report abuse
Scrap this story. Let's move on to the announcement that Palin just hired private counsel to represent her in the investigation of her for the illegal firing of a public service commissioner.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:24 PM | Report abuse
"look around and you'd see that it is a real American family - Sarah Palin is not just all talk - she is living the problems alot of American families are facing."
Yeah? Well keep those problems out of the White House!
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 6:24 PM | Report abuse
It gets better and better. Bush looks like a clown. McCain looks like Frankenstein’s monster. Cindy looks like drag-queen. Now this.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:23 PM | Report abuse
In my sate, the great state of Utah, us 58 year old men typically date women under the age of consent. I made my wife marry me when she turned the age of twelve and we have been happily married for the past three years.
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 4:30 PM
--------------------------
Man, some parts of our country are f'ed up!
Posted by: Chief Two Dogs | September 1, 2008 6:23 PM | Report abuse
How appalling ("a-palin") that this mother would take one of the most visable nominations in the world when her daughter's life is being made a circus? This is one of the most selfish things a mother could do. She should have never taken the nomination. If this is how she cares for her family, we should all be very afraid.
Posted by: Jacquie | September 1, 2008 6:22 PM | Report abuse
Keep it up, Obama. Attacking motherhood is going to make you despicable to most Americans, who like and sympathize with Palin and her upbeat, attractive family.
Posted by: jh | September 1, 2008 6:22 PM | Report abuse
Mrs Palin will be very busy with a large and very young family, plus the fact, her oldest daughter of 17 will have a baby. With no job and still in school, the responsibility will no doubt fall on the the Vice Presidential nominee.
Alot to do and alot to know..all in syncro..
Posted by: rh | September 1, 2008 6:22 PM | Report abuse
This pick is looking less and less presidential by the minute.
Posted by: golem | September 1, 2008 6:22 PM | Report abuse
This pregnancy will embolden our enemies.
With this woman in the White House, NO ONE will take the USA seriously ever again.
"Oh, excuse me President Hu Jintao - Vladimir Putin - Felipe Calderon - I just need to check in on my mentally retarded baby, and make sure my daughters aren't having sex -- again. I'll be right back with you to discuss trade and exchange rates -- missile defense in Poland -- NAFTA and immigration. I AM a serious person. REALLY!"
What a dysfunctional joke the Republicans are.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 6:21 PM | Report abuse
Lay off the kid, sure. But a debate moderator would not be doing their job if they didn't ask Palin to explain her views on contraception. What did she teach her daughter? What would she tell the girls of America? That's fair game.
Posted by: scrapster | September 1, 2008 6:21 PM | Report abuse
Janell - I could not agree more. Most working women settle for 1 or 2 kids. When you get to 3 or 4, you need either a super flexible job, a stay at home spouse, or alot of money. Any many women carefully plan as they take on new jobs or responsibilities, weighing carefully what it will mean for the family.
The difference between mayor of a small town (I live in one, 1 gas station, 2 supermarkets, 2 banks) is alot from governor of state, and a world away from vice president.
I question the judgement and ambition of a woman with 5 kids who wants to do this.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:20 PM | Report abuse
I think people should not be so judgmental about the Palins. Sarah Palin's family may not fit into the white picket fence Brady Bunch family image but look around and you'd see that it is a real American family - Sarah Palin is not just all talk - she is living the problems alot of American families are facing. She can identify.
Posted by: Laura | September 1, 2008 6:20 PM | Report abuse
Wow! How EXCITING to be in the company of SO MANY pure, moral male and female virgins! I musta died and gone to heaven with so many precious "saints" commenting on here!
Posted by: Pinky Tharp | September 1, 2008 6:20 PM | Report abuse
This family issue has no relevance, but I have to say If it where Obama's daughter...my god...my god...what would the right wing media be saying right now?? It would be Armageddon.
Posted by: case | September 1, 2008 6:20 PM | Report abuse
--“Who cares?!?
It means nothing (unless she has been vocal about it being a parent's responsibility to not let their teenage daughters become pregnant).
Posted by: Ohio Blues | September 1, 2008 5:48 PM “--
WRONG IN BIG WAY.
* Sex education in schools.
* Access to contraceptives for school kids.
* Welfare for teenage mothers.
Those are the solids off the top of my head.
There’s the statutory rape issues if the boyfriend is over 18 (my titillation favorite).
The hypocrisy laid bare we’ll just have to deal with. The Evangelical’s are probably used to being snickered at, and so they probably won’t hear a little more, and they’ll be tone deaf to their own hypocrisy when they resume telling everyone how to behave.
For what it’s worth Sarah Palin is big on abstinence education. Despite the evidence in her own family that it doesn’t work, it won’t mean much to Republican’s. Their capacity for self-delusion is now, of course, legendary and - backed by the Evangelical storm troopers – they’ll just keep on keeping on.
It seems that McCain doesn't mind a VP being swamped with family issues while trying to learn how the Federal Government works before McCain has a serious medical problem. I've said it before: I can't wait to see what his cabinet looks like.
Posted by: NoOneImportant | September 1, 2008 6:19 PM | Report abuse
I am a working single mom raising a young son. I feel bad for this girl, but what does it say about the mother and her parenting that this girl at the age of 16 was sexually active and did not use protection.
The GOP likes to throw around words like 'family values' but what value do the parents of this family have? This raises huge questions for me about their parenting competence.. and frankly if their own house in a mess I would rather they stay out of the White House.
Posted by: Beth | September 1, 2008 6:19 PM | Report abuse
Thankfully Bristol didn't use birth control. That would've made God quite angry.
May the Lord bless the Palin family- those with us now and those that'll be born over the next several months.
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 6:19 PM | Report abuse
The sticky issue is that Sarah lied and may not quite yet be done lying.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:19 PM | Report abuse
Where was Palin when her daughter was getting pregnant? This obviously proves that she can not handle being gov and a mother of 5 or 6 or 7.... wait a second.... doesn't Mc Bush have the same problem when it comes to how many homes he owns?? Maybe 8 is enough?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:18 PM | Report abuse
I like Palin, Her kid gettin pregnant just shows that she has to deal with the same stuff as the rest of us. There are other scandals with her that hold more wieght you can see them at http://www.veeppeek.com
Posted by: Dann | September 1, 2008 6:18 PM | Report abuse
well folks it looks like we got ourselves a white trash back water girl tryin to get in the white house. now ain't that just a hoot. wonder what scandal is gonna hit the press tomorrow? seems to me she should just stay up there and keep shootin moose an runnin her state like a country hick instead of handin the election over to obama.
Posted by: ray reyns | September 1, 2008 6:17 PM | Report abuse
so... did anyone even know this woman was being considered as the VP pick? There were numerous websites launched early in the month of August that made it sound like the choice had been made by the first week of August. VPILF.com (as in M.I.L.F) was registered and had content as of August 4th.
There's a lot of strange stuff going on here.
Posted by: i call BS | September 1, 2008 6:17 PM | Report abuse
Jerry! Jerry ! Jerry!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:16 PM | Report abuse
Up until now, no serious citizen was bringing up Obama's legitimacy or illegitimacy or his mother's marital status or age at the time of his birth.
I don't know of any serious Republican who has tried to make anything of Michelle Obama's claim that Obama's mother was "very young and very single" when he was born. Thanks to the NutRoots, that phase of this campaign now seems to be over.
Palin's opponents seem to think her daughter's teenage pregnancy is legitimate political material. Do they want to bring Anne Dunham's pregnancy into the spotlight? As far as I can tell from a few minute's research, she was 17 when Barack was conceived. Her "husband," Barack's father, was already married.
Barack has written two autobiographies without providing been any details of their marriage and his birth. He has always claimed that his parents were married.
I'm not going to blame Obama for not going into details. The Bible tells us to honor our father and mother, and he can tell his own story without telling theirs. Obama may or may not have known about his own parents' true marital status... if I were his mother, I might not have told him about the fine print on the marriage license.
But his supporters have now created a situation where Michelle's "very young and very single" statement is relevant to a major line of attack on Palin. I, for one, would now like to know just how single "very single" is. Was Ann Dunham married to Obama's father when he was born?
Posted by: Scott Somerville | September 1, 2008 6:16 PM | Report abuse
I can't wait until McCain backs Palin "1000 per cent."
Posted by: feralboy12 | September 1, 2008 6:16 PM | Report abuse
--"Samina Hayaat | September 1, 2008 1:29 PM
If Palin stayed home and watched her daughter instead of trying to prove how manly she is by running Alaska maybe Bristol Palin would not have got preg." --
You all are hilarious. I love how you all say what you would do to raise your children perfectly. No parent can control what their child does every minute. As hard as a parent tries, young people still screw up. It happens ALL THE TIME to the best of families. This baby will have a lot of family support, which is what children need most. Think of your friends families.. we all know EVERY family has problems.. nothing goes perfectly. Please.. look at your own family and the families of those close to you.. See any that are perfect?? ;)
Palin could likely run the country better than Obama. I like Obama but as the presidential nominee, he doesn't have anything over Palin as the Vip as far as I can see.
I might vote for Obama. I would like to see some sort of national healthcare. But in the end countries are best served by strong leaders who will protect the country and do the right thing. McCain and Palin seem pretty strong in that respect.
Ronald Regan will likely go down in history as one of the best leaders this country ever had. He was a natural. Palin seems to exhibit some of this same traits.
Posted by: kalo | September 1, 2008 6:15 PM | Report abuse
Wow Jimmy thanks for the link to the http://www.veeppeek.com Those Pictures are hallarious., Ha Ha. I think we should leave the youngster alone.
Posted by: gregg | September 1, 2008 6:15 PM | Report abuse
I'm a former Republican as of this moment.
Her resume has made me squeamish since the moment her candidacy was announced. But a mother endorsing her 13-year-old daughter sleeping with a 23-year-old adult? And tolerating it for years?
Those are NOT family values. She's a shameful example of America. I'm disgusted at my party and what it has come to represent.
Posted by: Joan Dettering | September 1, 2008 6:14 PM | Report abuse
Does anyone know the girls DOB? Or how hold the father is?
Nice to know how well abstinence works!
Posted by: RNCRHPCRTS | September 1, 2008 6:14 PM | Report abuse
Sarah Palin is, like, a superwoman! After all, when she WENT INTO LABOR in April, she didn't let it get in the way of her busy life. She gave a big speech, then flew 14 hours on 2 Alaska Airlines flights! No one even knew she was pregnant (she didn't mention it to Alaska Airlines).
Posted by: Kaylie McCain | September 1, 2008 6:14 PM | Report abuse
Repubs, necons lend me your ears! The Palin issues have nothing to do with people living in glass houses and not throwing stones. They have to do with who is qualified to run this country. The average mother of a pregnant teen is not whooping it up next to the Repub presidential hopeful. So, your sanctimonious comments about looking to our own houses are totally out of context. But then why am I not surprised? Sarah Palin has 5, count them 5 children. One has severe special needs, poor little thing. How many people out there cheering for this fiasco have 5 children? Do you know what it's like? How many of you have a child who is severely developmentally disabled an only starting out in life. She and her hubby need to go home and take care of their children. They are using them as a campaign poster for the far right. Do you really think that's OK? And let me ask you, does having family values mean that you give birth, but abdicate responsibility after that? And what girl who grows up in the company of a loving mother who actually pays attention to her gets pregnant? Read the studies. This is a comedy of errors and I don't want to live in a country that perpetrates such a farce on its hard working populace. She may be real cute and she may know how to shoot, she obviously knows how to make babies but she's sure as hell not qualified to run this country and as VP that's how she needs to be viewed.
Posted by: RZoe | September 1, 2008 6:14 PM | Report abuse
The internet is going to make a pig's breakfast of this election very fast. Barack Obama is a coke-snorting Muslim, Sarah Palin faked a pregnancy, Bristol's boyfriend is 26, and I accidentally swallowed 8 spiders last year. All of these I would have missed if I limited myself to reliable news sources.
Posted by: feralboy12 | September 1, 2008 6:14 PM | Report abuse
Her favorite meal is moose stew!!!
Posted by: Any woman for president (who cares)! | September 1, 2008 6:14 PM | Report abuse
Things Karl Rove thinks would be so bad for the democrats to exploit:
1) lack of experience
2) family births
Is there anything else Karl would like everyone to ignore? He is so helpful in pointing them out.
Maybe?
3) undue influence investigations
4) I was for the bridge before I was against it
What else should we overlook Karl? Please send an update of the republican talking points ASAP!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:13 PM | Report abuse
At the risk of sounding sexist, Sarah Palin is not in a good position to be president or vice president at this time. First, she has a 4 month old baby who will need a great deal of special care, and really should have his mother's attention. Her daughter's also pregnant -- and she will also need her parents' attention to help her at that time. On the morality side, I do have questions about Sarah Palin's parenting--not only because her teenage daughter is pregnant, but because she was willing to engage in this election, depsite what's going on in her family life. And are we as a country really willing to put a pregnant teenager in the highest office in the nation? Because if McCain gets elected, where's Bristol gonna live until she gets married? I'm sure that Sarah's not going to leave her in Alaska. I think it might have been wise for Sarah Palin to hold off on her white house ambition. If she would have waited a couple of years (until her daughter got married, and out of the house) and her baby was older, and there was a lot less drama going on in her life, and she was more experienced, then she may be a good candidate. Now is not the time.
Posted by: Janell | September 1, 2008 6:13 PM | Report abuse
Wow Jimmy thanks for the link to the http://www.veeppeek.com Those Pictures are hallarious., Ha Ha. I think we should leave the youngster alone.
Posted by: Gregg | September 1, 2008 6:12 PM | Report abuse
The only part of this discussion with any relevancy;
How will the GOP handle Palin's removal from the ticket?
Do they do it before Wednesday, and hope that voters forget come November?
Or wait a few weeks, and let Palin claim that the race is just too gruelling given her responsibilities on the home front?
Posted by: Republican VN Era Veteran | September 1, 2008 6:11 PM | Report abuse
I'm shocked by the low-class comments of all-too-many liberals here.
Rather than deal with issues, they go in for low-rent insults and ad hominem attacks.
I guess this is Barack Obama's "New Politics" at work.
Posted by: Rhymeswithright.mu.nu | September 1, 2008 6:11 PM | Report abuse
McCain did not vet her, but she is being vetted now!
she has hired an attorney because to the trooper gate mess
and maybe was a member of the AIP (Alaska Independence Party). sole aim is to succeed from the union..
stay tuned...
Posted by: Message in a bottle | September 1, 2008 6:11 PM | Report abuse
So much for teaching abstinence only right Palin? Maybe if this gun-toting witch would have spent a little more time at home teaching her "values" instead of trying to force them on the public she wouldn't be in this mess. The hypocrisy surrounding Palin and the entire Republican party is as thick as chocolate pudding! Democrats! This is a gift-horse we need to ride until the legs fall off!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:10 PM | Report abuse
Of course, if Democrats say ANYTHING about this, they are using it for political gain... but it's perfectly OK for Sarah Palin to make sure that everyone knows that her daughter will keep the baby and marry the father... and that's not for political gain??? If she didn't want to exploit her daughter she would've announced the pregnancy and refused to answer the other questions based on the privacy of the family... but instead she is able to regain the sympathy of the Christian conservatives... nope, no political gain going on there!!!
Posted by: SoCalDem | September 1, 2008 6:10 PM | Report abuse
To daman1: You're the one with your head in the beltway. These anti-Palin views are coming from New Mexico, a swing-state.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:10 PM | Report abuse
The Repulicans need to be consigned to an insane asylum.
They are well and truly CRAZY!
Posted by: Michael Palin | September 1, 2008 6:07 PM | Report abuse
Get those McCain & Palin '08 buttons and bumper-stickers NOW.
Within a few days you'll be able to add them to your collection of the McGovern & Eagleton' 72 ones.
The hits just keep on coming!
Posted by: Bill D | September 1, 2008 6:07 PM | Report abuse
I'm stunned by the comments on this blog. The whole country has gone NUTS. This is the first day of my life that I'm ashamed to be an American. Shame on all of you, and shame on Cillizza for even assessing the "political fall out" of a candidate become a Grandmother. Just don't think this qualifies as a political event worthy of discussion . . .
The number of lies and distortions being spread is outright shameful.
The number of Obama voters who think Sarah Palin should stay home "barefoot and pregnant" so to speak because she already has enough to do as a mother is MIND-BOGGLING! Would you have this view if she were a man? Give me a break--the fact she has accomplished what she has is IMPRESSIVE. She can obviously multi-task and make decisions under pressure. It's obviously time for this country to deal with SEXISM and double standards.
And the number of McCain supporters who are trying to wear this as a badge of honor is a little annoying as well. While I agree this isn't a great tragedy, this probably isn't the best situation for a young woman.
What any of this has to do with Sarah Palin's selection as the VP nominee is beyond me--nothing at all it would seem. I don't think McCain will dump her, and I don't think Palin was chosen because she is a woman but because she took on her own party and is a reformer. This is the message McCain wants to take into the election, and given that theme, it would seem that Jindal and Palin are the only VP possibilities who fit that bill, and Palin has the advantage of being able to discuss energy policy knowledgeably as well.
Given all the trash on this Blog, no American should ever again ask themselves why we don't have better candidates. We don't deserve better, and what really high-achieving person would ever want to put up with all of this crap in order to run.
Palin, go home tonight and you and the "first dood" can have a good cry, and then you dust yourself off and get right back out there!
Posted by: Chad3337 | September 1, 2008 6:07 PM | Report abuse
Welcome to the Jerry Springer show. This issue here is not Palin's daughters pregnancy but the old soap opera atmosphere surrounding these folks. Whcih calls into question McCain's judgement is choosing her.
Posted by: johnbsmrk | September 1, 2008 6:06 PM | Report abuse
Here's the document that convinced Senator McCain to pick Gov. Palin as VP in order to confront M. Putin on next Russian Crisis.
http://thebruceblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/palinqueen.jpg?w=400&h=604
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:06 PM | Report abuse
I am a high-profile professional woman with two children. I am also a Democrat. And, like the right has shown indignation toward left choices-- this woman Palin makes me feel indignant. What kind of parent would accept being a VP pick knowing that she would be exposing her unwed, pregnant child to International scrutiny. Isn't this child creaming out for attention? Doesn't she deserve a calm, private atmosphere during the last four months of her pregnancy and a lot of parental guidance? Call me indignant but I think what Ms. Pailn is doing is cruel in the extreme. if she were a loving parent she would have said "thanks but no thanks."
Posted by: ignatious | September 1, 2008 6:06 PM | Report abuse
I am a high-profile professional woman with two children. I am also a Democrat. The right has shown indignation toward left choices-- but the choices of this woman Palin makes me feel indignant. What kind of parent would accept being a VP pick knowing that she would be exposing her unwed, pregnant child to International scrutiny. Isn't this child screaming out for attention? Doesn't she deserve a calm, private atmosphere during the last four months of her pregnancy and a lot of parental guidance? Call me indignant but I think what Ms. Pailn is doing is cruel in the extreme. If she were a loving parent she would have said "thanks but no thanks, Mr. McCain"
Posted by: ignatious | September 1, 2008 6:06 PM | Report abuse
I hope even Republicans recognize what a bad choice for the country Palin is. This is not about "lefty" or "righty". This is not about Democrat or Republican, this is about the good 'old USA and having the best! The best!
We have not had the best for the past 8 years. The USA needs the best Republican or Democrat!
Palin? I certainly would not want her in the same Foxhole with me!
Posted by: Message in a bottle | September 1, 2008 6:06 PM | Report abuse
Gee daman1 I would expect that from a liberal but not from someone in the GOP. Have we sunk that low? If you ever came to my church I'd beat the Christ into you so hard you wouldn't be able to sit for a good month. What the hell is wrong with you. Get the crap out of your ears and start listening. God help you.
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 6:06 PM | Report abuse
How do you suppose Karl Rove would handle such an announcement? Especially, given Sarah Palin is a member of Femenist for Life, a group that opposes birth control even for married couples and women who are victims of rape or incest should not have access to the morning after pill?
Posted by: adelle | September 1, 2008 6:06 PM | Report abuse
I know the right wing want to blame anyone's dirt on Obama but he didn't have a thing to do with this. People from Alaska are sending in emails and tearing up the internet with inside info on this family. Unfortunately, when you are in political office you are fair game. Minor children aren't but I believe people are intrigued because the story told isn't adding up to what we are actually reading and seeing. I can't understand someone in labor and leaking amnio fluid catching a plane back to AK. Something just seems untruthful about this story. Like John Edwards, the truth will COME out.
Posted by: Katy | September 1, 2008 6:06 PM | Report abuse
Thats what I am telling you. These people aren't quant. They are backwoods hicks that don't relate to anyone in the lower 48.
When you say Alaska, think rural Appalachia
------------
I was just watching some old footage from Alaska of Palin and her attempt to fire a trooper. She runs Alaska like the Mob. And her husand, Tractor Palin, he has no teeth. What the hell kind of dental plan they got there in Alaska? Christ help us.
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 6:00 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:06 PM | Report abuse
Get those McCain & Palin '08 buttons and bumper-stickers NOW.
Within a few days you'll be able to add them to your collection of the McGovern & Eagleton' 72 ones.
The hits just keep on coming!
Posted by: Bill D | September 1, 2008 6:06 PM | Report abuse
you know, if they time this right (and America shoots itself in the foot again at the voting booth), we can have a white house wedding.
Posted by: or | September 1, 2008 6:06 PM | Report abuse
Katy -
Who's taking care of the kids? Oh, I don't know, maybe the father? Maybe the grandparents are involved? Maybe they have domestic help?
You realize that one of those 5 kids is already an adult - and now government property in the hands of the US Army. Their two oldest daughters are 14 and 17. Their youngest children are 7 and an infant.
Are you suggesting it's inappropriate for my wife to be working? After all, we have a 4yr old and two 1yr olds.
Where are your questions about who's caring for Malia and Sasha?
Posted by: Cynicism101 | September 1, 2008 6:06 PM | Report abuse
"
A lot of the comments by the lefties in here are pretty nasty. I wonder if they realize that they are making their candidate look bad, even though he seems to have the decency or the sense behave better than they.
Posted by: Vincent | September 1, 2008 5:49 PM "
...pluheze.
spare us this right-wing butt-tripe, will you?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 6:06 PM | Report abuse
Wow Jimmy thanks for the link to the http://www.veeppeek.com Those Pictures are hallarious., Ha Ha. I think we should leave the youngster alone.
Posted by: Gregg S. | September 1, 2008 6:06 PM | Report abuse
Katy -
Who's taking care of the kids? Oh, I don't know, maybe the father? Maybe the grandparents are involved? Maybe they have domestic help?
You realize that one of those 5 kids is already an adult - and now government property in the hands of the US Army. Their two oldest daughters are 14 and 17. Their youngest children are 7 and an infant.
Are you suggesting it's inappropriate for my wife to be working? After all, we have a 4yr old and two 1yr olds.
Where are your questions about who's caring for Malia and Sasha?
Posted by: Cynicism101 | September 1, 2008 6:06 PM | Report abuse
I know the right wing want to blame anyone's dirt on Obama but he didn't have a thing to do with this. People from Alaska are sending in emails and tearing up the internet with inside info on this family. Unfortunately, when you are in political office you are fair game. Minor children aren't but I believe people are intrigued because the story told isn't adding up to what we are actually reading and seeing. I can't understand someone in labor and leaking amnio fluid catching a plane back to AK. Something just seems untruthful about this story. Like John Edwards, the truth will COME out.
Posted by: Katy | September 1, 2008 6:00 PM | Report abuse
I was just watching some old footage from Alaska of Palin and her attempt to fire a trooper. She runs Alaska like the Mob. And her husand, Tractor Palin, he has no teeth. What the hell kind of dental plan they got there in Alaska? Christ help us.
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 6:00 PM | Report abuse
This is just to confirm that Mccain made his choice not because Palin can help the country but because she can get the sympathy of Americans mostly women. The country needs good leaders who can help the economy and all our issues but not leaders who are being to political. Palin is just a Mccain being Political and I am not taking it. Obama is being himself and he didn't try to locate a VP with current family DRAMA but a High profile LEADER. I respect the Palin family but OBAMA ROCKS.....
Sarah 's daughter doesn't need all this, she needs support and not all these criticism.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:59 PM | Report abuse
Most of America LOVES Palin and what she stands for. This is not a big deal and is something common folk can relate to. I think this could actually rocket McCain in the polls as people associate the smears and attacks with Obama.
Posted by: daman1 | September 1, 2008 5:56 PM
----------------
So relevant, neocons bush/cheney and now McCain/Palin climate issue deniers get a hurricane to cancel their Convention first day....
Neocons and evangelicals against Sex Ed and sex before marriage see their VP Pick announce 17 y.o. daughter's off-wedlock pregnancy...
May I advise Bristol not listening to her mothers suggestions regarding babies naming, I got two ideas for the newborn:
...whether it be a boy or a girl?
Gustav or Katrina?
Posted by: HAHA LAUGHING OUT SO LOUD | September 1, 2008 5:59 PM | Report abuse
Obama says Palin's family off-limits
CNN - 57 minutes ago
MONROE, Michigan (CNN) -- Sen. Barack Obama said firmly that families are off-limits in the campaign for president, reacting to news that GOP running mate Sarah Palin's 17-year-old daughter is pregnant.
Posted by: Independent Voter | September 1, 2008 5:59 PM | Report abuse
To me, this is not about the scandal of a teenage pregnancy. Rather to me the real scandal is about the general knee-jerk response to attempt to hide or somehow disguise it. As a devout Christian, myself, I don't see parental love for this teenage girl either in the rumored version of Trig Palin's birth, made all the more believable (whatever its provenance) simply because it is so commonplace OR in the current shot-gun wedding plan.
Doesn't ANYONE else here see this as a continuing plague upon our national culture - that such shame is directed to young people about sex that living a lie one's entire life OR being forced into a loveless marriage - is PREFERABLE to simply owning one's humanity or the truth?
And why, Chris, are you repeating the arch conservatives' talking point that the rumor was spread by the Obama campaign when professional journalists, of all people, actually know that it was the Anchorage Daily News that first reported on the shocking news of Gov. Palin's suddenly announcing that she was 7 months pregnant back in March? (http://www.adn.com/front/story/336402.html)
Where's the journalistic curiosity? Or integrity?
Posted by: Carmen Cameron | September 1, 2008 5:59 PM | Report abuse
I hope the enraged hyena mob calling themselves demoncrats keep barking at this issue until election day, thinking in their sick pea sized brain that this "issue" matters. It doesn't. What matters as Ronal Reagan said is CHARACTER, and Sarah Palin is the one. Go Sarah, you are the best, Venceremos!
Posted by: Juan | September 1, 2008 5:58 PM | Report abuse
SHAMe on you SARAH!!!!! SHAME SHAME SHAME!!! selfish selfish selfish!!!!!
How could she put her daughter to the public wolves like this????
This woman is horrible horrible horrible!!!
I HATE SARAH PALIN FOR PUTTING HER DAUGHTER IN THIS PUBLIC SITUATION!!!!!!!!
THIS IS CHILD ABUSE!!!!!!
Posted by: Bosqcatl | September 1, 2008 5:57 PM | Report abuse
I personally support unprotected premarital teen sex, and would like to know how I could get involved. I would appreciate it if the GOP could introduce me to some of these lovely young ladies.
Posted by: dr | September 1, 2008 2:56 PM
Here you go! http://thebruceblog.wordpress.com/2008/08/30/sarah-palin-sisterhood-of-the-traveling-catsuit/
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:57 PM | Report abuse
Some conservative women might think Palin should stay home and raise her family.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:57 PM | Report abuse
An abstinence only advocate VP candidate is forced under scrutiny to reveal that her home school underage child became pregnant out of wedlock. Dems better be careful not to say anything harsh!
Seriously, you freaks in the media are so terrified of the Wal-Mart morons it makes me puke. This is bizarre as hell, imagine if Barack Obama's black teen-aged daughter got knocked-up. Think about that. Can you imagine all the slime that would be thrown and the concealed tsk tsks of the white male punditry.
Posted by: This blog kinda sucks | September 1, 2008 5:57 PM | Report abuse
Democrats want government to stay out their and everyone else's private lives.
Republicans want government to interfere in other peoples' private lives, but never their own, and never to interfere with their business practices.
Palin, who ascribes to the latter philosophy, and who wants to appoint Supreme Court justices that would cement that governmental interference in privacy, wants the media to respect her own daughter's privacy.
Palin/McCain's optimal Supreme Court justices do not even believe privacy is a constitutional right.
Because of her anti-choice, pro-religion, teach-abstinence-only, don't-allow-birth-control, self-righteous stances, Palin ensured that her teen daughter's pregnancy would be a public matter the moment she climbed on board team McCain. Her own political views that she wants to inflict on the rest of us and her own political ambitions put her daughter in the limelight.
Whether she understood that or not when she accepted her role as McCain's running mate, her decision shows that her judgment is just as bad as that of the maverick who chose her.
I wonder if McCain looked her in the eyes and knew she'd be a good running mate, or if he just relied on the political wisdom of Karl Rove. Either way, this decision is more proof that he's just like Bush.
Republicans want accountability for everyone else, but somehow the demented right-wing bloggers are trying to twist this debacle to make it Barack Obama's fault too. Why don't you people look at yourselves in the mirror. You'll see what a hypocrite looks like.
Posted by: ANONYMOUS | September 1, 2008 5:56 PM | Report abuse
Get your heads outside the beltway. Most of America LOVES Palin and what she stands for. This is not a big deal and is something common folk can relate to. I think this could actually rocket McCain in the polls as people associate the smears and attacks with Obama.
Posted by: daman1 | September 1, 2008 5:56 PM | Report abuse
It depends whether you teach it as a fact or a mythology. They think the Flintstones are historical fact. What happens when they ask her how old the earth is?
-----------
Mario -
What's wrong with teaching creationism in school?
Whether you believe in it or not (I do not), a large portion of the population does. Teaching a base level of "this is what creationism theory is" gives students perspective on how to deal with others in society who may believe in creationism.
It may also give students perspective to see that not everyone in society shares the same viewpoints.
Posted by: Cynicism101 | September 1, 2008 5:50 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:55 PM | Report abuse
On naming children:
Of the last 100,000 black girls born in the state of california, 40% of the girls names did not appear once among the names chosen for white girls. More incredibly, 32% of the black girls names didn't even appear again among a single other black girls name. That's right, they're unique.
Like Obama's girls' names: Shanirikra and Saskatawatchini. So enough of the names, homey.
Posted by: naming conventions | September 1, 2008 5:55 PM | Report abuse
My goodness.
The last few years have been bad, but this seems surreal.
What a joke. The Republicans are an embarrassment.
Go back to the trailer park, and leave the White House alone.
This isn't a game.
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 5:55 PM | Report abuse
My mother always taught me that before you criticized others, you got to look at your closet first. If you democrats did not realize yet that most of your supporters have teenage daugthers that are pregnant than something is wrong with you hypocrit people. Teenage pregnancy happens everywhere in this country not just to the Palin. If you are the party that support women than stand up and support the women instead of being a hypocrits.
Posted by: Susan of Iowa | September 1, 2008 5:55 PM | Report abuse
It amazes me that many said "let's impeach Preident Clinton" because of his lies but also because of his inability to make sound judgement concerning his affair with Monica. Now, many say this is okay. The teen daughter isn't the issue. It's all the issues going on in this family right now that are concerning while mom runs for VP. Who's going to solve this? The grandparents? Extended family? Children come before any job.
Posted by: Ned | September 1, 2008 5:54 PM | Report abuse
This woman can't even run her own family and she could be a heartbeat away from running the free world! You've got to be kidding me! I think with 5 kids including a newborn baby and a grandchild on the way, she should focus on her own house instead of the White House and show some real family values. These two-faced, hypocritical, holier-than-thou, creationist freaks in the right-wing of the Republican party make me sick...McCain must either be desperate or senile to pick such an un-vetted, unprepared pageant contestant to be the possible leader of the war on terror, our economy and our military.
Posted by: susanr | September 1, 2008 5:54 PM | Report abuse
LOL, thanks for the link Pete http://www.veeppeek.com thats really a funny site., Cool Juno phonto shop at the other link.., thats funny too., That other link to the image that someone else left., with Palin holding a gun in a bikini.,.... I dont think that is real. That is a photo shop.
Posted by: JIMMY | September 1, 2008 5:54 PM | Report abuse
This was an attempted cover up. The truth was kept from the public, hoping the truth would not be uncovered.
McCain thought that Americans are so "dumb" they would not be able to discern the truth.
Or, is this just another Senior moment for John McSame?
Posted by: Message in a bottle | September 1, 2008 5:54 PM | Report abuse
This is just to confirm that Mccain made his choice not because Palin can help the country but because she can get the sympathy of Americans mostly women. The country needs good leaders who can help the economy and all our issues but not leaders who are being to political. Palin is just a Mccain being Political and I am not taking it. Obama is being himself and he didn't try to locate a VP with current family DRAMA but a High profile LEADER. I respect the Palin family but OBAMA ROCKS.....
Sarah 's daughter doesn't need all this, she needs support and not all these criticism.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:54 PM | Report abuse
It's easy to be critical of others, while coveting the privacy of our own lives. The truth is, life happens to all of us, and despite our best plans and good intentions, it always presents the unexpected. How we respond reveals a great deal about our character. Palin and her family are no exception. Thus far, all evidence indicates the manner in which Palin and her family tackle life's unexpected challenges, is consistent with the social values she espouses...with a reverence for life and the loving support of a close family. I have great confidence in Mr. Palin's abilities, and willingness to assume the role of the wise and nurturing, stay-at-home dad, while Mrs. Palin works. Their proven ability to "roll with the punches" is reminiscent of previous generations; those whose tenacity formed the sturdy foundation on which our great country was built.
Posted by: ConserveGov't | September 1, 2008 5:53 PM | Report abuse
I will take the pregnant 17 year old any day over JEREMIAH WRIGHT. Who, as an adult, Obama sat and listened to for 20 years!!!! If you want to sling mud, the Republicans will have the upper hand over the cocaine head Obama.
Obama has WAY MORE skeletons. The main stream liberal press won't report them.
Posted by: suzie
**********************
howz yer trailer holdin' up, suzie? Yer husband/cousin got it holdin' tight?
Posted by: suzie loves her some Bush!! | September 1, 2008 5:53 PM | Report abuse
Obama doesn't control CNN. Cnn has a crew in Alaska now checking into what ever there is to find. This is a hillbilly family they are going to uncover a lot. Wait till they hit the family tree and the relatives. Are you kidding me?
=========
You know what is happening as we as are talking here? They are all over the story on CNN and other channels. The republicans are not doing much to stop it. I have a feeling the republicans want this to get out of hand as an excuse to get rid of her.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:44 PM
-----------------------------------------
Don't you idiots realize the more they talk about this the more Obama and his people will be blamed for attacking Palin and her sweet daughter and the more sympathetic people will become to her and the more votes McCain/Palin will get? Wait till the next round of polls come out...predict McCain will move ahead by 3-4% with reaction against Dem smears.
Posted by: daman1 | September 1, 2008 5:48 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:53 PM | Report abuse
The only response to this new should be to pray for the families involved. It seems that Bristol will have the love and the support of her family and that's what she needs most at this time.
http://dayofpraise.blogspot.com/
Posted by: Bethie | September 1, 2008 5:53 PM | Report abuse
i was a teen mom, so let me give you some perspective. it is one of the most humiliating experiences ever. you are visibly showing and people automatically think you are promiscuous. the father can go on doing whatever he wants to do while you become a social outcast. you have to deal with very serious emotional and physical problems. you worry about your future and the future of your child. many of the dreams you had for yourself have to be curtailed. you are scared and feel very alone even if there are a lot of people around. if you were pregnant at 17, would you really want to have this media scrutiny? would this really be in your best interest? your child's best interest? wouldn't you think your mother would put you first instead of a political agenda? would you want the pressure of having to make life decisions like marriage judged by the entire world? would you want to feel pressured to marry just because that's probably what's best for your mother's political career? what is palin subjecting her daughter to? mother to mother - i have no respect for her. i would never put my teenage daughter through this; it's bad enough when you are pregnant at 17 and have to endure all of the gossip and snickers from your community, let alone the entire world! and yes, you make the courageous CHOICE (which everyone should have) to have your child, and you do get judged. so please, Sarah, go back to Alaska and take care of your family.
Posted by: melanie | September 1, 2008 5:52 PM | Report abuse
Republicans is bad, cuz they have intercourcese. Democrats is good, cuz we knows how to be proper.
Go Democracts. Beat Republicans. Go Fight Win.
Posted by: Barack Obama | September 1, 2008 5:52 PM | Report abuse
So relevant, now McCain/Palin just as neocons Bush/Cheney climate issue deniers get a hurricane to cancel their Convention first day....
Neocons and evangelicals against sex Ed and sex before marriage see their VP Pick announce 17 y.o. daughter's off-wedlock pregnancy...
May I advise Bristol not listening to her mothers suggestions regarding babies strange-naming, I got two ideas for the newborn:
...wether it be a boy or a girl?
Gustav or Katrina?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:52 PM | Report abuse
Is it true that the young man involved with impregnating Bristol Palin, named Levi, is black?
Posted by: Quincy | September 1, 2008 5:52 PM | Report abuse
Palin was clearly not thoroughly vetted. Whatever you make of the news of the teen's pregnancy, it was a surprise to the Republicans. Surprises are not welcome during a convention. Combine that with Palin's support for abstinence only sex ed, her belief in no exceptions if raped, the widening investigation into her abuse of power while Governor of AK, and her echoing Stevens and Young by saying that Alaska will benefit by her being VP, and I think McCain has a colossal mistake on his hands.
Posted by: kad3927 | September 1, 2008 5:51 PM | Report abuse
To WomenStayAtHomeThen: How many teenaged girls have careers??? I think at that age they are trying to finish high school!
Posted by: Hmmm | September 1, 2008 5:51 PM | Report abuse
Mario -
What's wrong with teaching creationism in school?
Whether you believe in it or not (I do not), a large portion of the population does. Teaching a base level of "this is what creationism theory is" gives students perspective on how to deal with others in society who may believe in creationism.
It may also give students perspective to see that not everyone in society shares the same viewpoints.
Posted by: Cynicism101 | September 1, 2008 5:50 PM | Report abuse
Palin women = tramps.
Posted by: Lobo | September 1, 2008 5:50 PM | Report abuse
how come obama having young kids,
is never brought up as in issue?
talk about gender bigotry!!!!
Posted by: Double stan | September 1, 2008 5:50 PM | Report abuse
Its over as I knew it would be. John McCain decided to put his desires first instead of the country. He did not vet this female, because if he did, he would have chosen someone worthy, like Kay Baily Hutchinson. What a joke of a man.
Ms. Palin -- stop telling folks how to live their lives and keep a close eye on your own. I have a 17 year old daughter myself. I hope my daughter will wait until she is married to have sex, but if she does not, guess what, I will not condemn her for it. Everything comes full circle and now that time is upon you. Why would you subject your child to this non-sense shows a real lack of parenting and prorities. You made sure you put it out that she is going to marry the father. You see once again, we must please the christian base. Pathetic people, just pathetic.
And last, for all you holly rollers, you know, you PERFECT christians. You have egg on your faces and you have nothing to do at this point but to try and rally behind your pathetic party. You are about as christian as lets say JUDAS!!!!!!!!!! If you were REAL christians you would have spoken out about this pick in the first place. But no, you kept your mouths shut because you feel POWER that this idiotic man went against his own beliefs to please so-called christians. Do you believe in the word or the word that most benefits you?
Posted by: Shianne | September 1, 2008 5:50 PM | Report abuse
Tho I don't support the GOP (dear God no), the Palins are doing the right thing as far as mother & baby are concerned. As long as we don't hear any "abstinence-only" policy BS from the McCain/Palin family, I'm AOK with the situation. I agree with Obama and think folks oughta lay off -despite the thoughts about what Rush et al would do with a parallel situation.
Posted by: Skip Mendler | September 1, 2008 5:50 PM | Report abuse
Teen pregnancy isn't really the issue here. Trying to get sex ed in schools is like pulling Republican teeth. The REAL issues are there's an infant with Down's Syndrome; a teenager out of school for several months with a supposedly debilitating illness yet gets moving violations; and now a pregnant teen whose mother is running for higher office with even more responsiblity than the one she's already in. Who's taking care of the 5 children and tending to the very serious issues at home? Republicans and their core family values mean nothing if no one is home minding the family. SMH....All of this is troubling and the stories are not adding up.
Posted by: Katy | September 1, 2008 5:50 PM | Report abuse
Wow!
Is this the image the US wants to project now to the world?
"White Trash, Under God."
Posted by: Michael Blaine | September 1, 2008 5:50 PM | Report abuse
So relevant, neocons bush/cheney and now McCain/Palin climate issue deniers get a hurricane to cancel their Convention first day....
Neocons and evangelicals against Sex Ed and sex before marriage see their VP Pick announce 17 y.o. daughter's off-wedlock pregnancy...
May I advise Bristol not listening to her mothers suggestions regarding babies strange-naming, I got two ideas for the newborn:
...wether it be a boy or a girl?
Gustav or Katrina?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:50 PM | Report abuse
"Is Sarah Palin demonstrating the family value of being a "good mother"?"
Yes for the 10,000 time fthe father takes care of the children.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:49 PM | Report abuse
"He won't be pulling anybody, she is absolutely loved by conservative men and women alike." There is no sin that cannot be overlooked if you "are loved by conservative men and woman," and no sin too small to exploit if you are "hated by conservative men and women." Just one more example that conservative "morality" is a fraud used to attack others, yet not to be applied at home. Everyone knows that had this been a Democratic candidate Daughter's pregnancy the "conservative men and women" would be using it as Exhibit "A" demonstrating the moral failing of liberalism. Yet when it is one of their own, suddenly premarital sex and out of wedlock pregnancy is a virtue, something to be proud of, and celebrated by Tony Perkins and the family values bunch. What complete and utter hypocrisy.
p.s., That abstinence only ides that Gov Palin supports works wonders, huh? Or was she too busy with other things to pay attention to what was happening in her own home. What's next, will we learn that Gov Palin and her husband are cousins? I am sure all the religions wrong people would be just as proud of that too.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:49 PM | Report abuse
The Rumors are true! Sarah Palin's retarded baby is really Bristol's and Todd Palin is the father. God help us all!
http://gawker.com/5043944/the-truth-about-those-sarah-palin-pregnancy-coverup-rumors
I knew McCain should have stuck with Mitt. How and the hell are we going to recover from this?
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 5:49 PM | Report abuse
Who takes care of the kids? No one, it's Alaska. When you think Alaska just think Appalachia.
--------
As a woman, and a mother, I wonder who is taking care of the Palin children?
Who will give the needed guidance and support to this pregnant child, while her mother is off campaigning and her father is working?
This girl needs a parents guidance and attention, and obviously needed it sooner in hr life!
Is Sarah Palin demonstrating the family value of being a "good mother"?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:45 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:49 PM | Report abuse
A lot of the comments by the lefties in here are pretty nasty. I wonder if they realize that they are making their candidate look bad, even though he seems to have the decency or the sense behave better than they.
Posted by: Vincent | September 1, 2008 5:49 PM | Report abuse
I like Palin, Her kid gettin pregnant just shows that she has to deal with the same stuff as the rest of us. There are other scandals with her that hold more wieght you can see them at http://www.veeppeek.com
Posted by: PETZI | September 1, 2008 5:49 PM | Report abuse
I is Barack Obama, and I approved this ad:
No mo' pregnant girls jumpin' on the bed! Vote for Obama! Yeah!!!
Posted by: Obama | September 1, 2008 5:49 PM | Report abuse
Let's face it. Scum is as scum does.
Posted by: catclaw | September 1, 2008 5:49 PM | Report abuse
You know what is happening as we as are talking here? They are all over the story on CNN and other channels. The republicans are not doing much to stop it. I have a feeling the republicans want this to get out of hand as an excuse to get rid of her.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:44 PM
-----------------------------------------
Don't you idiots realize the more they talk about this the more Obama and his people will be blamed for attacking Palin and her sweet daughter and the more sympathetic people will become to her and the more votes McCain/Palin will get? Wait till the next round of polls come out...predict McCain will move ahead by 3-4% with reaction against Dem smears.
Posted by: daman1 | September 1, 2008 5:48 PM | Report abuse
WHAT A TRAIN WRECK! What a role model! Are these people closet MORMONS?
Mom apparently has been asleep at the wheel since becoming Governor.
One heartbeat away from being the Leader of the Free World? It's the fall of the Roman Empire Part Deux.
Posted by: A.M. | September 1, 2008 5:48 PM | Report abuse
It's KARMA baby!
Posted by: Curmudgeon | September 1, 2008 5:48 PM | Report abuse
Who cares?!?
It means nothing (unless she has been vocal about it being a parent's responsibility to not let their teenage daughters become pregnant).
There are lots of things that make her a lousy choice for VP (lack of experience, ideology, scandal, saying she stopped the bridge to nowhere when she really supported it).
Nobody cares that her kid got knocked up.
Posted by: Ohio Blues | September 1, 2008 5:48 PM | Report abuse
This is just to confirm that Mccain made his choice not because Palin can help the country but because she can get the sympathy of Americans mostly women. The country needs good leaders who can help the economy and all our issues but not leaders who are being to political. Palin is just a Mccain being Political and I am not taking it. Obama is being himself and he didn't try to locate a VP with current family DRAMA but a High profile LEADER. I respect the Palin family but OBAMA ROCKS.....
Sarah 's daughter doesn't need all this, she needs support and not all these criticism.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:48 PM | Report abuse
micheal moore is enthused that a hurricane
is killing people, because it somewhow proves 'god' exists. bill mahr is ridiculing Mike Huckebee, cuz he believes
'god' exists. Now it's time for the 'better and smarter' than thou, liberals to throw a 17 year old girl and her family into
the meatgrinder
of their superior 'intellect'.
compassion is at the core
of a human being,
keep looking,
you will find it,
if not in this life,
perhaps the next.
Posted by: samaritan | September 1, 2008 5:48 PM | Report abuse
Being pregnant at the age of 17 isn't anything "bad in one's family background", nor is being gay - as some one below insultingly suggested.
Being a hypocrite and trying to impose one's bigotry on every one else just as Ms. Palin and her religious right have been doing for years, that's not only BAD, it is inacceptable.
Once again, Republican hypocrisy reveals itself in the clearest possible manner!
Posted by: Sascha | September 1, 2008 5:48 PM | Report abuse
I will take the pregnant 17 year old any day over JEREMIAH WRIGHT. Who, as an adult, Obama sat and listened to for 20 years!!!! If you want to sling mud, the Republicans will have the upper hand over the cocaine head Obama.
Obama has WAY MORE skeletons. The main stream liberal press won't report them.
Posted by: suzie | September 1, 2008 5:47 PM | Report abuse
People, I like Mccain but I must tell you. This was a crazy choice. Crazy choice!
Posted by: IIO | September 1, 2008 5:47 PM | Report abuse
AP has just announced that Sarah Palin has hired a lawyer with regard to the Troopergate allegations.
Posted by: Marie Stewart | September 1, 2008 5:47 PM | Report abuse
Whatta buncha' stone throwers. Some think that evangelical christians will not be able to embrace Gov. Palin as a candidate for vice president. Jesus said "which one of you will cast the first stone?" Since they all crawlwed back under a rock and shrank from their initial criticism of a woman who had "erred" he said "where are your accusers now? they no longer accuse you and neither do I" What's really important here are the people involved. Gov.Palin, her daughter Bristol, the unborn child, and the child's father. who wants to throw the first stone?
Posted by: works in the woods | September 1, 2008 5:47 PM | Report abuse
It's funny how the whole nation was bombarded by the type of person Obama's preacher is, but the so-called 'immoral behavior' of the Republican VP's daughter is supposed to be off-limits! Bristol's actions are much more important, because she is Gov. Palin's responsibility. Her values are supposed to have been shaped by her parents.
Posted by: Andrew | September 1, 2008 5:46 PM | Report abuse
This is just to confirm that Mccain made his choice not because Palin can help the country but because she can get the sympathy of Americans mostly women. The country needs good leaders who can help the economy and all our issues but not leaders who are being to political. Palin is just a Mccain being Political and I am not taking it. Obama is being himself and he didn't try to locate a VP with current family DRAMA but a High profile LEADER. I respect the Palin family but OBAMA ROCKS.....
Sarah 's daughter doesn't need all this, she needs support and not all these criticism.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:46 PM | Report abuse
You complianing liberal idiots! You have the right to choice. You can choose to keep your freakin' legs crossed. Then you could choose to use contraceptives. Then you could choose to "pull and roll". So many choices.
What you want is the choice to be a freaking idiot, and then have an abortion. Dumb idiots...
Posted by: Rights in America | September 1, 2008 5:46 PM | Report abuse
I want her off the ticket and I will tell you why?
John Mccain could win. She can not be a heart beat away from the office.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:45 PM | Report abuse
It appear she can't keep her own house in order, why should we think she would be a good VP!
Posted by: Robert | September 1, 2008 5:45 PM | Report abuse
WHO'S THE DADDY?
Where's Maury when you need him?
Posted by: Chris | September 1, 2008 5:45 PM | Report abuse
As a woman, and a mother, I wonder who is taking care of the Palin children?
Who will give the needed guidance and support to this pregnant child, while her mother is off campaigning and her father is working?
This girl needs a parents guidance and attention, and obviously needed it sooner in hr life!
Is Sarah Palin demonstrating the family value of being a "good mother"?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:45 PM | Report abuse
You repugnant Republicans are a bunch of HYPOCRITES. When November comes, my Democrat team will be out in droves voting against you right wing morons.
Sarah Palin is a far right wing neo conservative. She is just like Bush and McCain.
Bush, McCain, and Palin, they are all the same. I don't want 4 more years of corruption and the right wing conservative agenda in the White House.
Women can kiss their reproductive rights goodbye if they vote for McCain and Palin. The American worker can kiss their job goodbye if they vote for McCain and Palin because McCain and Palin are for NAFTA. Barack Obama is against NAFTA.
McCain and Palin will turn back decades of Civil Rights laws and bring our country back to the horse and buggy days with their United States Supreme Court nominees and with their political agenda.
As Hillary said, NO way, NO how, NO McCain!
VOTE FOR BARACK OBAMA AND LETS GET A DEMOCRAT WIN IN NOVEMBER!
Posted by: Dan1967 | September 1, 2008 5:45 PM | Report abuse
Tom O, the media didn't give Biden a pass. It's one of the reasons he dropped out of the election at the time. It's just old news.
On Palin and her daughter, I think Obama's response is the right one: leave this one alone. It's not relevant to politics. It's why I think Obama should be president.
Posted by: Tami | September 1, 2008 5:45 PM | Report abuse
Three things:
1. For someone running on a family values ticket, Bristol (that has now been revealed has had premarital sex) is a poor example for our youth.
2. Don't they say that young girls often seek out the attention of boys because they lack attention from their parents (esp. the father). So much for Todd doing a great job as a parent (as Sarah loves to say).
3. If Bristol was going to get married, why is it that she didn't do it before her mother was picked for the VP slot. Sarah's statement saying Bristol plans to marry the boy seems contrived.
Posted by: richtriple8 | September 1, 2008 5:45 PM | Report abuse
The Rumors are true! Sarah Palin's retarded baby is really Bristol's and Todd Palin is the father. God help us all!
http://gawker.com/5043944/the-truth-about-those-sarah-palin-pregnancy-coverup-rumors
I knew McCain should have stuck with Mitt. How and the hell are we going to recover from this?
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 5:44 PM | Report abuse
You know what is happening as we as are talking here? They are all over the story on CNN and other channels. The republicans are not doing much to stop it. I have a feeling the republicans want this to get out of hand as an excuse to get rid of her.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:44 PM | Report abuse
Whoa, Nelly. Give the girl a break. Who the heck knows, one day my daughter Shanikra or Saskawatchanii might get preggo. Who knows, ya know. I is right about this, yo hommey.
Posted by: Barack OBama | September 1, 2008 5:43 PM | Report abuse
"Bristol Palin made the decision on her own to keep the baby, McCain aides said"
Gosh who are they trying to con this time. McCain-Palin, if they win this election would deny the right of 'making her own decision' to every woman in this country. Everyone should be respected as to the choices they make with respect to their own business. What we can not afford to respect is the willingness of some to impose their choices upon all of society. We should take this opportunity to really consider what this country will look and be like if McCain-Palin get their way to do away with both Roe vs Wade and perhaps even the right to privacy (contraception).
Ever since Roe the debate over reproductive freedom has been a hypothetical one, but no more. Even those of you who call yourself pro-life, I think you really really need to think about what this country would be like. Think of Bristol Palin unable to make a decision on her own. Really think of the intrusive power of the state denying women reproductive freedom. How can you allow that for your daughters, sisters, wives, or mothers, or for yourself? Is that the kind of America you really want? It is a real possibility now, so think about what it would really mean.
Posted by: steve seg, cincinnati | September 1, 2008 5:43 PM | Report abuse
Way to go, John McCain -- finally someone understands the key attributes that America wants in a VP: a former beauty queen who shoots moose and has promiscuous children. This could even move Brangelina out of the headlines. Go GOP. And look for Sarah Palin on Dancin' With The Stars after the ticket loses in November!
Posted by: A new American Idol | September 1, 2008 5:43 PM | Report abuse
Get those McCain & Palin '08 buttons and bumper-stickers NOW.
Within a few days you'll be able to add them to your collection of the McGovern & Eagleton' 72 ones.
The hits just keep on coming!
Posted by: allydib | September 1, 2008 5:43 PM | Report abuse
This is just to confirm that Mccain made his choice not because Palin can help the country but because she can get the sympathy of Americans mostly women. The country needs good leaders who can help the economy and all our issues but not leaders who are being to political. Palin is just a Mccain being Political and I am not taking it. Obama is being himself and he didn't try to locate a VP with current family DRAMA but a High profile LEADER. I respect the Palin family but OBAMA ROCKS.....
Sarah 's daughter doesn't need all this, she needs support and not all these criticism.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:43 PM | Report abuse
This is totally irrelevant to the issues unless Palin has grandstanded her family values or criticised other mothers who were out of wed-lock or below the age of consent. Do we really think that all the other present/previous candidates' teenage sons and daughters are/were not having sex. This girl was just unlucky that she became pregnant. Give her a break. And I'm a democrat and a Catholic.
Posted by: Dan | September 1, 2008 5:43 PM | Report abuse
It's amazing how anti-life the Dem posters are on here. You guys actually view this development as a negative...it's a positive thing! She kept her baby alive as opposed to Obama who said he "wouldn't want his daughters PUNISHED with a child.."!
More votes for us. Palin ROCKS!
Posted by: daman1 | September 1, 2008 5:42 PM | Report abuse
Mary said -
"I don't know if you Republican operatives realize it or not, but no one believes that Obama's people are behind all this."
Sure - I agree 100%. I do not believe someone on the Obama campaign staff is behind this. I do, however, believe that operators supporting Obama - most notably Kos, MoveOn, and the huff-n-puff are.
At least when Senator Kerry was "swiftboated" it was something about him. When the Dem hate machine comes to play, they focus personal sleaze directed at family members.
I give Senator Obama full marks for coming out and strongly stating this is "off limits" ... but I highly doubt many of his raving disciples will follow his guidance.
Posted by: Cynicism101 | September 1, 2008 5:42 PM | Report abuse
Mother30's ish,
Obama would have to know whether she was raped or had consensual sex first before he would call it a punishment.
If it's a rapebaby then yes, it's a punishment to the mother for having it. Palin doesn't care if you're a 12 year old raped and impregnated by your father, you're having the baby.
Posted by: AZA | September 1, 2008 5:42 PM | Report abuse
I thought having sex with one under 18 was statutory rape per se. So where are the police in all this?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:41 PM | Report abuse
This is a non issue. 30 years ago this might have been an issue, but now a days it isnt. If you could disqualify someone for having children that are a little irresponsible then just about everyone would be disqualified from serving any position. The real question is do you trust Sarah Palin to step in as President given her own skill set. That is a case that John McCain and Sarah Palin must make simply because she has no Washington or foreign expirence.
Posted by: robert | September 1, 2008 5:41 PM | Report abuse
Gov. Palin will soon be "Sarah of the 21 days"
She's hired a lawyer for Troopergate.
A minimum criterion for a viable candidate should be no active investigations/lawsuits.
And then the Bristol Palin scandal as the cherry on the top.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:41 PM | Report abuse
Would you people stop using the term "white trash"???!! I don't care if you are white and saying it, its still racist.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'm white and don't believe it has a thing to do with racism. It refers to a life style, an attitude, a mentality that most people seem to understand when it is mentioned. Do black people think calling another black person "ghetto" is racism. Damn they call each other worse names than that.
People are so fearful of being labelled "racist". I can say all kinds of things about a white person and no one ever says its "racist." But say one of those things about a black person and oh my God, I am labelled a racist.
Most people, irrespective of their own color, aren't real comfortable around other races. They may not like like some of the differences. Is that racism? I would say it isn't.
We just feel more comfortale around our own kind. That is normal and nothing to be ashamed of. By any race.
Racism is much more insidious and ugly than anything we are talking about.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:41 PM | Report abuse
I empathize with Barack Obama's sentiments but bottom line is that people naturally follow and emulate the behavior, thinking and personal policies of their leaders and for that reason it is in fact necessary to question what those personal policies are or might be. We as citizens have a right to know. Sorry Barack its not off limits, unless of course you are trying to keep follows from knowing they are about to step off a cliff.
As far as the baby making mistakes... Even the Bible says mistakes of the parents will live with the children and their children and their children for five generations. What mistake you ask? The word "bastard" was not stricken from the dictionary to avoid the word being used in this case. It refers to not to sentiments in this case but to physical and legal fact. The baby will have to live with the mistakes of its parents and so will the offspring and Long should know that.
As far as Sara's dealing with the unplanned parenthood of her daughter... abortion is not the way to go and a mistake, except for medical reasons, which unplanned parents should not make. Adoption is always a better solution for societies sake.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:41 PM | Report abuse
I would urge everyone to read the article by Nathan Thornburgh of TIME.
http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1837862,00.html
Good to know that there are still journalists with decency out there that have not lost perspective.
Posted by: AsBee | September 1, 2008 5:41 PM | Report abuse
Now it's official: The Republicans officially endorse keeping women barefoot and pregnant! Starting them young, too.
It's their policy approach to ending women's rights.
If you supported Hillary, you're really a fool to support Palin.
Posted by: Poly | September 1, 2008 5:41 PM | Report abuse
all you judgemental types make me laugh. where were all of you when Hillary was just allowing her man to screw anything and everything on 2 legs.... She's fit to be president and Palin isn't? some freegin hypocritical I must laugh out loud. You're all as arrogant as the empty suit Obama himself!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:40 PM | Report abuse
Well she wants creationism taught in schools, that would explain why her daughter doesn't know where babies come from or how to prevent unwanted pregnancies.
Posted by: Mario | September 1, 2008 5:40 PM | Report abuse
Palin's story is a Lifetime movie playing out in real time...only it's true. Even women who disagree with her politics are going to identify with her, especially with this new personal trial. Go ahead, lefties, attack her family. See where it gets you.
Posted by: kyleb | September 1, 2008 5:40 PM | Report abuse
My point is, 4 wheel driving drinking drugs sex is all they do up there. These people are backwoods hillbilly's. I LIVED THERE.
Look at the bio they released. They thought all the hunting and eating Moose was quaint, but you could say the same thing about some toothless person from the hills somewhere. These people are typical Alaskans and not who you want running anything
-------
>Drinking, drugs, sex, they are nuts up there, look at where they live? She >already admitted she used drugs in the past.
So did Barack Obama, on a regular basis BTW. And his mother also conceived him in her teenage years. So, what is your point ?
The attack on Sarah Palin's family private life comes on the eve of the news that her being chosen McCain's VP has simply wiped out Obama's convention bounce and undercut all his acceptance speech's central themes ("Republicans doesn't understand the plight of working families", "change coming to Washington, not from Washington", etc.). Pretty obvious, isn't it ?
Posted by: Mbruno | September 1, 2008 5:34 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:39 PM | Report abuse
Let's hope that Michelle Shaniqua Obama's little girls, Maleawan and Sashawan, do not inherit the ghetto mentality of their mother. She is rather common and is your typical lower-middle class angry black woman. She lacks good breeding, class, and manners.
Posted by: Dianne72 | September 1, 2008 5:39 PM | Report abuse
Wow - McCains got quite a pick here...
Just what America needs right now - The Britney Spears family soap opera in the White House.
Posted by: PulSamsara | September 1, 2008 5:39 PM | Report abuse
It's so fun to see the Christianists twist their arguments around to justify that somehow this is a "good" thing or that we should just ignore it because it's a "family" matter. This coming from a group that stops at nothing to spread vicious lies about their opponents.
Is this the only message that Sarah Palin knows how to convey? So far, her first 72 hours in the national spotlight have been all about how noble we are because we're "keeping the babies."
The fact that Sarah Palin is allowing her family to be subjected to this kind of scrutiny means that she gets what she deserves.
If they're so concerned about what effect this kind of scrutiny would have on their family, why did she accept?
Sarah Palin must have some kind of massive ego to think that her country needs her more than her family right now.
Posted by: Tom | September 1, 2008 5:39 PM | Report abuse
Hey all you folks who worry about Palin having to step in if something were to happen to McCain....don't worry Dick Cheney will be there...
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:39 PM | Report abuse
This woman is always telling people how to live their lives, she should practice what she preaches about family values.
Stay home and clean up your own house before you try and run the peoples House.
Posted by: patrick nyc | September 1, 2008 5:38 PM | Report abuse
It's funny how people expect Palin to be able to lead our country in the right direction, if needed, but she can't even lead her kids in the right direction. The hyporicy is scary! This should be big news, and should be discussed. If you have built your whole political image as ultra-conservative, pro-life, pro-family values, against gay marriage (because it is immoral), then having an un-wed daughter knocked-up at 17 should be a big deal. Remember, she is the so-called 'ethics crusader' in Alaska, but also under investigation for ethics abuse. Is Palin and the Republicans excusing her daughter's unplanned pregnancy, basically telling all of us to "do as I say, not as I do". Are they only picking what is deemed immoral in the Bible according to what they can actually follow, or want to follow?
Posted by: John | September 1, 2008 5:38 PM | Report abuse
So, isn't Bristol a minor? How old is the father? I'm very confused about the way Republicans always shun this kind of behaviour while being fully engaged in it. Will Sarah Palin speak out against underaged, teen sex?! Will Rush Limbaugh mock and make fun of this example of poor parenting by Gov. Palin and her husband? I'm so sick of their hypocrisy!
Posted by: Carlito | September 1, 2008 5:38 PM | Report abuse
TO SOMEBODY
You are a judgemental piece of crap. Her inexperience with the National media? How about all the 35 years of Biden and his experience with the national media? He plaguraizes and the liberal press gives him a pass. He puts his foot in his mouth and the liberal press gives him a pass. He is on the wrong side of history for every major vote in his 35 years and gets a pass because the liberal media runs the show. I can't wait for Murdoch to buy all those sagging media outlets up and turn the tables. Give me people like Palin - a breath of fresh air any day of the week and twice on Sunday - remember - MORE EXPERIENCE THAN OBAMA AND BIDEN COMBINED!!
Posted by: Tom O | September 1, 2008 5:38 PM | Report abuse
LOL, thanks for the link Pete http://www.veeppeek.com thats really a funny site., That other link to the image that someone else left., with Palin holding a gun in a bikini.,.... I dont think that is real. That is a photo shop.
Posted by: Jimmy | September 1, 2008 5:37 PM | Report abuse
All the family picture needs now is Jed and Granny.
Posted by: Trust Me | September 1, 2008 5:37 PM | Report abuse
"Just wait till Michelle Shaniqua Obama's little girls, Maleawan and Sashawan, have hip-hop parties, drink, and shoot up in the White House. Now that's a scandal worth printing."
That is racist. But for somebody whose grandfather, father and mother went to Harvard and worked hard for what they got, we can predict them getting their PhD's and being social workers and real educated girls, examples to all of us just like their mother. Meanwhile, you can go back to your trailer.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:37 PM | Report abuse
The only aspect of this discussion that is acceptable and relevant is:
How is the GOP going to handle Palin's withdrawal from the race?
Before Wednesday? Or do they let it simmer down for a few weeks.
My prediction is that she will withdraw in mid September.
Posted by: Republican VN Era Veteran | September 1, 2008 5:36 PM | Report abuse
We need a real Vice President, not a soon to be mother of two, with one being of special needs.. I dont care about the values I dont care about if its right or wrong its the simple fact that shes a hypocrite and now wont even have the time to be one.. We need somebody that can be there not a mother of what is soon to be two infants...
Posted by: erik | September 1, 2008 5:36 PM | Report abuse
the most interesting post here are the ones from the republican right, referring to any critical post as "lefties" or "left" or worse.
For 8 years now, the right has "pushed" it's moral superiority. What was it Jesus said about hypocrites? I don't think he held them i very high regard?
This is not so much about Sarah Palin and a pregnant 17 (or 16 when she did the dirty deed), but about John McCain's judgment!
If she was indeed 17 or 16 when the dirty deed occurred, why is the father not being charged with Rape?
Posted by: Message in a bottle | September 1, 2008 5:36 PM | Report abuse
I never saw the mudslinging, but it's rather absurd to think you can fake 9 months of pregnancy.
When the Spears girl was preggers, people were quick to judge harshly.
Glad this unwed teen mom gets the hero treatment.
Posted by: david | September 1, 2008 5:36 PM | Report abuse
Given the firestorm that has raged over the last few hours regarding Sarah Palin, the next few days will be very interesting. Will McCain do the sensible thing and replace Palin on the ticket, or will he tough out his dumb choice, afraid of acknowledging having made a mistake? Either way, he's sunk. Shooting from the hip frequently results in shooting yourself in the foot. Lucky for McCain it wasn't in his mouth at the time.
If McCain is so adept at drawing disaster upon himself, what would he do for the country? That is the question every sober Republican will be asking him/herself.
Posted by: Pragmatus | September 1, 2008 5:35 PM | Report abuse
Only a total moral moron would equate a Boy Scout uniform with the Hitler Youth.
Posted by: jaydee | September 1, 2008 5:35 PM | Report abuse
This will actually be another plus for McCain/Palin. We LOVE her here in the hinterlands.
McCain has won this election with his choice of Palin. Smart, independent, competent, achieving....not to mention pretty and can bait a hook and shoot a moose.
Posted by: daman1 | September 1, 2008 5:35 PM | Report abuse
The right wing nuts are desperate. They have infested all the boards, totally avoiding addressing the issues but instead resorted to cheap name calling and insults.
Stop whining, old John made a whopper. You can still use your brain and vote for Obama or Barr!
Posted by: M Willey | September 1, 2008 5:35 PM | Report abuse
Sarah Palin is egocentric, carrier obsessed oportunist. She is causing major trauma to her daughter and to her grandchild, while hiding the true nature of the relationship. Sarah extends the lie that will have life time consecuances for Bristol and the child. Bristol in her entire life must act as she is not the mother and hide her feelings. At this time that Bristol is the most volnurable she is put on a public viewing with the baby in her hands. She was very uncomfortable as you can see and Sarah was milking her own good mother image. That is shame. Poor Bristol such a tender age must be exposed to such a humiliation and exposure. She has to parade for her mother instead of taking care of her self and the baby.
Posted by: Nolan | September 1, 2008 5:35 PM | Report abuse
This makes the Palin family look like the modern day Clampetts.
Posted by: Charles Wingburg | September 1, 2008 5:35 PM | Report abuse
Disgraceful. If she can't manage her own daughter, how can she manage this country?! She should step down. McCain should be horsewhipped for choosing her. He had to have known, if the girl is 5 months pregnant. And if he didn't know, Palin should have told him and/or declined the offer. What's wrong with these people? The whole thing is shameful!!!
Posted by: allforchange | September 1, 2008 5:35 PM | Report abuse
>Drinking, drugs, sex, they are nuts up there, look at where they live? She >already admitted she used drugs in the past.
So did Barack Obama, on a regular basis BTW. And his mother also conceived him in her teenage years. So, what is your point ?
The attack on Sarah Palin's family private life comes on the eve of the news that her being chosen McCain's VP has simply wiped out Obama's convention bounce and undercut all his acceptance speech's central themes ("Republicans dosn't understand the plight of working families", "change coming to Washington, not from Washington", etc.). Pretty obvious, isn't it ?
Posted by: Mbruno | September 1, 2008 5:34 PM | Report abuse
I am a parent. I am for sex-education in schools. I don't want Palin to tell my kid's teacher to stop teaching sex-ed. Who does she think she is?
Posted by: A Parent | September 1, 2008 5:33 PM | Report abuse
Let's elevate this from a soap opera to...a movie. The title of the movie about the Alaska governor's pregnant teenage daughter could be "JUNEAU". Ellen Page could star without even altering her apearance! And then there's another family values issue for the two Republican leaders: John McCain has confessed to multiple extramarital affairs, leading to the demise of his marriage to wife number one and culminating in his present marriage. Maybe a movie called "Unfaithfulness of My Fathers"? Irony and hypocrisy abound.
Posted by: maggy lewis | September 1, 2008 5:33 PM | Report abuse
I got pregnant at 17 and it was a mistake
Posted by: barbarad | September 1, 2008 5:33 PM | Report abuse
No later then Friday. It is reported the GOP has been doing focus groups and she is running 2 to 1 negative. They are doing this right now. They want rid of her or they would not be focusing grouping her. It is too late.
-------
I have to say, I am at the point where I feel genuinely bad for Sarah Palin. I think she has little idea what is going on on the world stage, no experience with the crush of national media attention, and is in way, way over her head.
I think this will be another Eagleton - the question is, how long does it take Team McCain to realize this - and to ask her to withdraw for "family reasons."
The longer they wait, the worse it will be. I bet she withdraws before the end of the convention. If I had an Intrade account, I'd make me some money.
Posted by: Somebody | September 1, 2008 5:24 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:33 PM | Report abuse
TeddyZ wrote:
"
Look at the footage of her VP announcement. She doesn't have a care in the world when it comes to that baby. What mother would allow her infants (with Downs) to be exposed to a massive, loud crowd? Look at how the daughter holds that baby. Have you people been missing this season of "Mad Men?"
I have more faith in Michael Jackson being the daddy to his children than Sarah Palin has of being the mother of that infant"
You obviously have little experience with children. People cradle sleeping babies across their shoulders like that all the time. For a newborn, this might not offer good head support, but for a 5-month-old, this is perfectly fine.
As for taking kids to large events, what is the problem? Babies will still sleep when they need to. Parents need to be mindful of overloading their children, but good parents also know how to maintain active lives while raising children. I would not take an infant to a pounding rock concert, but a political rally or church or something similar is normal and does not harm the baby at all, Downs or otherwise.
Stop sniping.
Posted by: buzzardist | September 1, 2008 5:33 PM | Report abuse
Diane72 wrote:
"Just wait till Michelle Shaniqua Obama's little girls, Maleawan and Sashawan, have hip-hop parties, drink, and shoot up in the White House. Now that's a scandal worth printing."
Uh, can you say, "racist?" Better yet, a racist spinning assumptions about black "behavior".?
Posted by: tdub | September 1, 2008 5:33 PM | Report abuse
If this was your average black girl getting pregnant as a teenager it would have been classified by the right wing as the disintegration of family values in America... If this was Chelsea Clinton it would be a torch for the right wing to herald family values.. This is not what a VP of the most powerful nation in the world needs to be. We need a VP not a mom, because you know what I don't care about this kid, her kid, or her little sister, her mother should and I'm sure will. Not as VP of the United States of America and next in line to be president behind a 72 year old man with a history of health issues....
Posted by: erik | September 1, 2008 5:33 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: George | September 1, 2008 5:33 PM | Report abuse
I like Palin, Her kid gettin pregnant just shows that she has to deal with the same stuff as the rest of us. There are other scandals with her that hold more wieght you can see them at http://www.veeppeek.com
Posted by: Petzi | September 1, 2008 5:33 PM | Report abuse
"If not I am going for Obama / Biden for the sake of America."
Goodbye
She's not being pulled.
Still loved by middle America.
Waste your vote if you like!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:33 PM | Report abuse
Please be good americans, and good losers. Show more respect for our next vice president and her family.
Posted by: Dave | September 1, 2008 5:32 PM | Report abuse
Is the state picking up the insurance bills for this pregnancy ? Where and how old is the father ? Any Statuatory Rape issues here ? Maybe Mom should have spent a little more time with daughters talking / instructing about birth control - Oh yea ..... She's on the abstenance only bandwagon.
Posted by: Jack | September 1, 2008 5:32 PM | Report abuse
I think, this was all a set up to grab all H. Clintons votes that are undecided. McCain was smart to do that, but a poor choice was made, everyone is always stating Obama lacks experience. OMG! look at her record. The only difference is now that Obama is African American (Black) and people are scared that a Black president is at the brink of grabbing the Title of President. I guarantee you all, something will happen, some "Bush Tactic" Republicans are going to Win this one, but by force. Even if the numbers show that Obama won, Republicans will Win. And I am a Minority, born and raised in America (NYC), I guess you Republicans will slither your way in, AMERICA Wake up, we cannot let Bush win, YES BUSH, McCain is a Puppet, much to old and stuck on War tactics to ever see what we actually need for the American people, Big Oil Industries have the Willy Wonka Golden ticket. And I bet it does not say Obama/Biden. I can rest assure that what i am writing will not be posted, because Washington Post will not allow it. But we need to Stand up, and say NO to this Madness. Godspeed.
Posted by: Fulvio Leo Cabrera | September 1, 2008 5:32 PM | Report abuse
Didn't Barack Obama promise to "change the tone in Washington," and run a positive campaign without gutter politics?
That promise, like so much else from the Obama campaign, has gotten thrown under the bus as soon as it became politically necessary. No less a liberal figure than Paul Krugman actually urged Obama to resort to the "politics of personal destruction" as soon as McCain started catching up to Obama in the polls. "Not a moment too soon," Krugman chortled.
It's bad enough that we have to endure personal attacks on the candidates. But to drag their teenage daughters through the mud to make a political point is utterly reprehensible.
Just another example of the moral rot in politics today.
Posted by: sinz52 | September 1, 2008 5:31 PM | Report abuse
People need to stop with the statutory rape allegations. Statutory rape laws are governed by states and not by the U.S. Constitution. The age of consent in Alaska is 16.
I also have not seen the father's age as 26 in any credible news source. Just on the comments here.
Posted by: ecdc | September 1, 2008 5:30 PM | Report abuse
"Whatever you say about Palin's experience, it compares immediately with Obama's. Yes, Palin does not have the decades of experience in high public office that McCain and Biden have, but neither does Obama. At least Palin has some executive experience, which every other candidate on these tickets is lacking."
There are more people in Barack Obama's *state* senate district than in the state of Alaska.
And you know what, if Sarah Palin had run a grueling national campaign and gracefully, clearly and surgically unseated her party's ruling dynasty, as Obama did with the Clintons, I don't think her experience would be an issue. The fact is, we've been watching Obama make command decisions and work his way up for more than a year now.
This is to say nothing of the fact that Sarah Palin did not get her passport until 2007, while Obama has made several official trips abroad as a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Sarah Palin is less experienced than Barack Obama. And McCain has shown an incredible recklessness in choosing her.
Posted by: Mary | September 1, 2008 5:30 PM | Report abuse
"McCain will be pulling the nomination of this fraud within the week."
He won't be pulling anybody, she is absolutely loved by conservative men and women alike.
Tide has turned in this race.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:30 PM | Report abuse
This thing IS our business. It is NOT a private affair BECAUSE conservatives do not believe in privacy. They can tell people how to live their private lives-- who to sleep with, how, when to have children. So let's not stop talking about this scandal. Let's not respect their private lives because they do not respect ours. I want teh Palin family to be ashamed because they love to tell people how to live their lives.
Posted by: outraged | September 1, 2008 5:30 PM | Report abuse
If McCain withdraws his VP announcement and takes somebody who is able to be the president in case he dies than I will vote for him. If not I am going for Obama / Biden for the sake of America.
Posted by: DisillusionedRepublican | September 1, 2008 5:30 PM | Report abuse
I don't really think that this matters at all. What she chooses to do with her daughter and what her daughter chooses to do isn't really important unless Sarah Palin does something illegal. She's not, Bristol's not, and even Obama has declared this to be not an issue.
I don't really even know why it's being discussed, this is a family matter for them which they can take care of.
Posted by: Shain from NH | September 1, 2008 5:30 PM | Report abuse
Is the state picking up the insurance bills for this pregnancy ? Where and how old is the father ? Any Statuatory Rape issues here ? Maybe Mom should have spent a little more time with daughters talking / instructing about birth control - Oh yea ..... She's on the abstenance only bandwagon.
Posted by: Jack | September 1, 2008 5:29 PM | Report abuse
I have three daughters. Not one of them would have been allowed to date a 23 year old when they turned 14. The pregnancies were incidental to the first lack of parental judgment. Do you think that those in Wassilla didn't know the age of the guy, but Palin says it was her high-school sweetheart that she dated for 3 years?
I am confused.. But more importantly,
Abuse of Power! Palin wrote a beautiful letter of recomendation of Mike Wooten so he would get hired as a trooper. Either she had poor judgment then to not see the bad guy, or she is implimenting a vendetta now using the Governor's office to do it.??
These people scare me,, and I am an evangelical Christian who believes in taking care of the poor, the widows, the homeless, the sick, and doing unto to others. You can't legislate morality, but real christians could put a big dent in the abortion rates if they put their love where their hatred is... in their mouth and their actions.
Palins letter of recomend. link.. Maybe her judgement should be the issue. Give this link a minute to load, as it looks empty at first.
http://extras.mnginteractive.com/live/media/site163/20080721_111415 PatlinLetterOfRecomend
Posted by: Jay in Oregon, intelligent Christian | September 1, 2008 5:29 PM | Report abuse
I find it puzzling how indignant the righties are about this "private family matter". I think it is quite obvious that a candidate's personal life indeed frames their story. Take John McCain's life, for example. Do we only cherry pick the positives when we make that analysis? Especially given the outright lies about Obama (he's a muslim, he is unpatriotic, he is a racist, etc). Now we have a TRUE story that runs against the grain of what Palin has been preaching about with regard to "family values" and opposition to sex education--and somehow that is off limits? Wake up and smell the kimche, Republicans, you can't have it both ways.
Posted by: tdub | September 1, 2008 5:29 PM | Report abuse
Inspired by the campaign to make the family laugh.
Forget about the mean people posting here.
Can a Obamacan make Sarah's family laugh?
Yodeling
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDDEk2AMJAI
Obamacans for Obama/Biden '08
Posted by: Republican Rebel | September 1, 2008 5:29 PM | Report abuse
So here's my issue with this debacle:
1. palin supports abstinence-only teachings. There's no sex-ed in Alaska. Studies show it doesn't work. Clearly.
2. The grandparents to-be are using her pregnancy as pro-life leverage ("we're so proud she chose life") when Gov palin is on record saying she would not let her teenage daughter have an abortion, even if impregnated by a rapist
3. If Biden or Obama had an unwed teenage daughter having a baby, ooooooooooooooooh the calamity! There would not be a single conservative offering any of the support being offered to the palins offered to a Dem candidate, not even for choosing life.
Just for the record, I feel awful that poor girl is being dragged into national attention like this.
Posted by: Linnae | September 1, 2008 5:29 PM | Report abuse
If I had thought that I could find a higher quality of political discourse in DC than here in Anchorage, then I would stand disabused of that assumption. Sadly, from hither to yon vile comments from base Democrats abound. (And I'm not even a Republican, so don't go there.) The McPalin ticket isn't good enough to serve America, but the O'Biden ticket takes presidential babysitting to a new high? That's a new low in Democratic hypocrisy.
Posted by: Mike Rogers | September 1, 2008 5:29 PM | Report abuse
Just wait till Michelle Shaniqua Obama's little girls, Maleawan and Sashawan, have hip-hop parties, drink, and shoot up in the White House. Now that's a scandal worth printing.
Posted by: Dianne72 | September 1, 2008 5:28 PM | Report abuse
The hypocrisy of "family values" conservatives like Palin is breathtaking. McCain will be pulling the nomination of this fraud within the week.
Posted by: Allen | September 1, 2008 5:28 PM | Report abuse
Ah yes, like a previous blogger so keenly noted. Examine the facial expressions in this picture at the top, and think of the old cliché.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:28 PM | Report abuse
We have an ailing nation with nothing but lots of WMD's "Weapon of Mass Distractions"
"Where have all the Leaders gone?" - Lee Iacocca
Posted by: Leonardo | September 1, 2008 5:28 PM | Report abuse
As an Arizonan I have voted for Senator McCain for many years. Due to his choice of VP I can no longer support him and will vote for OBAMA. Many of my Republican friends are doing the same. This whole situation has become a circus. Very sad indeed.
Posted by: CM | September 1, 2008 5:28 PM | Report abuse
LOL, thanks for the link Pete http://www.veeppeek.com thats really a funny site., That other link to the image that someone else left., with Palin holding a gun in a bikini.,.... I dont think that is real. That is a photo shop.
Posted by: Jimmy | September 1, 2008 5:27 PM | Report abuse
Like mother like daughter.
Sarah ran off to elope with her high school boyfriend after college when she got pregnant too. It was such a secret that she had to use some elderly people from the retirement home down the road as witnesses. These are facts. Talk about abstinence only education and Christian family values. This goes to the heart of the problem and why Christians have failed to govern the last 8 years. Their religious beliefs get in the way of moral behavior.
If only Sarah could have admitted she was pregnant rather than running off, she could have had an honorable wedding with her family. But she was too embarrassed, and couldn't admit to her family what she did until later.
And here we have the Palins trying to hide their own daughter's teenage pregnancy... until they had to spill the beans because of internet rumors.
It's a good thing we have internet rumors I guess, or the Palins would have kept this a secret, and the values voters who demanded to know about Clinton and Edwards' affairs wouldn't have been making their choice about Sarah Palin without incredibly important info about the moral failures in her own family and the hypocrisies they expose in the radical rights' approach to womens' rights issues.
Posted by: JD | September 1, 2008 5:27 PM | Report abuse
As a constitutionalist, a businessman, and family man, I feel that all of this news coming out makes this lady and her family MORE attractive in the eyes of our nation.
I, as a Republican, do NOT like McCain.
But, I will say this:
That ugly, cheating, lying, SOB (respect to his mother) is looking better BECAUSE of her real life situation(s).
And, at least she seems to speak without having to read each word.
Ron Paul can save America.
All of the others are a crap shoot.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:27 PM | Report abuse
I've heard said that one of the political parties had pelvic issues. I.e. there is an ideological fixation on reproductive organs. Which party would that be again?
Posted by: Stephen | September 1, 2008 5:26 PM | Report abuse
Wait just a minute! If McCain knew about the teen-age pregnancy, and if everyone is so all fired righteous about the blessed event (and don’t get me wrong, a baby is a blessing), then why did the McCain/Palin campaign have to be forced into revealing this information? Doesn’t the GOP deserve full disclosure before they nominate a VP candidate?
Posted by: codexjust1 | September 1, 2008 5:26 PM | Report abuse
No one said it was boy friend. The father could be some crack head she met once.
-------
Is the boyfriend over 18? If he is it's statutory rape and he should be prosecuted. It's a moral necessity.
Posted by: Timmy | September 1, 2008 5:21 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:26 PM | Report abuse
Where are you getting the information that "Levi" is 26?
Posted by: HereWeAre | September 1, 2008 5:26 PM | Report abuse
Forget Country First. How about Family First? Senator McCain, you and your selection committee have made a mockery not only of the office of the vice-president but of the family values our party stands for. The pregnant child deserves love and most of all attention from her mother and father right now, as does the disabled child. Gov Palin, please take responsibility for the children you have created and focus your talents on them. You are young enough to defer the big job to a better time.
Posted by: Laura | September 1, 2008 5:25 PM | Report abuse
Jeff (at 5:17) wrote:
"Palin is certainly charming and may (and that's a big may) be capable of being VP, and possibly the President, someday. She simply just doesn't have enough experience to potentially run this country today. Charm does not qualify a person to be the Vice President of the United States."
Let me revise a little:
Obama is certainly charming and may (and that's a big may) be capable of being VP, and possibly the President, someday. He simply just doesn't have enough experience to potentially run this country today. Charm does not qualify a person to be the (Vice) President of the United States.
Whatever you say about Palin's experience, it compares immediately with Obama's. Yes, Palin does not have the decades of experience in high public office that McCain and Biden have, but neither does Obama. At least Palin has some executive experience, which every other candidate on these tickets is lacking.
Posted by: blert | September 1, 2008 5:25 PM | Report abuse
Barack Obama's mother was married to his father. She was a teenager, but not an unwed mother. She did not know that Barack Obama Sr. had already married a woman in his native Kenya. These details were in the Washington Post.
Posted by: Dem Mother | September 1, 2008 5:25 PM | Report abuse
Mike--directly from Palin statement
"Bristol and the young man she will marry are going to realize very quickly the difficulties of raising a child, which is why they will have the love and support of our entire family. We ask the media to respect our daughter and Levi's privacy as has always been the tradition of children of candidates."
Good catch, Linguist!
Posted by: ecdc | September 1, 2008 5:25 PM | Report abuse
"McCain chose her as VP to distract from the real issues at hand."
That an unexperienced candidate who's only claim to fame is being black is being considered for President?
Issues like that?
You guys don't corner the market on dynamic candidates anymore.
Get over it
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:25 PM | Report abuse
I can't believe this is news! How does this even matter when it comes to the political views of the candidate? The media these days is so damn sad!
Posted by: Tom Ince | September 1, 2008 5:25 PM | Report abuse
I have to say, I am at the point where I feel genuinely bad for Sarah Palin. I think she has little idea what is going on on the world stage, no experience with the crush of national media attention, and is in way, way over her head.
I think this will be another Eagleton - the question is, how long does it take Team McCain to realize this - and to ask her to withdraw for "family reasons."
The longer they wait, the worse it will be. I bet she withdraws before the end of the convention. If I had an Intrade account, I'd make me some money.
Posted by: Somebody | September 1, 2008 5:24 PM | Report abuse
I just discovered that the father of Bristol's unborn baby is 26 years old. She is 16. Do they not have statutory rape in Alaska? I thought Alaska was a part of the U. S. Consenual sex or not it is still statutory rape. This young 16 year old will find out real quick what it is like to give birth to a child. Pain, pain, pain. The father should be put in jail and the Palins need to make appointments for psychiatrists. How can anyone be happy that their young teenage daughter is going to be mother. She is still a child herself. Great pick McCain. Sort of like your trophy wife over your dying wife. You sure have excellent taste in the women in your life. NOT!!!!!!
Posted by: Capricorn13 | September 1, 2008 5:24 PM | Report abuse
The Cheney's have been consistently supportive of their gay daughter and have never lied about her gayness. In fact, Mary Cheney has given interviews supporting her father. The Cheney's approach towards Mary has never damaged their conservative credentials.
Gov. Palin should but objectively HAS NOT exhibited the same kind of class with respect to her children, even if they've made mistakes that don't fit the family values mold.
---------------------------
What's your point? She isn't gay like Cheney's daughter, she is not ugly and homely like Jimmy Carters daughter? Go ahead and throw the first stone if you have nothing bad in your own family background. It is life, and had nothing to do with elections.
Posted by: Jim | September 1, 2008 5:17 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:23 PM | Report abuse
One Republican Hypocrite after the other will rise in support of Palin. Framed in family values....the family is dysfunctional. talk about the Fockers....this family is typical of republican hypocrisy!
Posted by: Message in the Bottle | September 1, 2008 5:23 PM | Report abuse
Thank you Senator McCain for bringing Reality TV to Politics!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:23 PM | Report abuse
Look at the footage of her VP announcement. She doesn't have a care in the world when it comes to that baby. What mother would allow her infants (with Downs) to be exposed to a massive, loud crowd? Look at how the daughter holds that baby. Have you people been missing this season of "Mad Men?"
I have more faith in Michael Jackson being the daddy to his children than Sarah Palin has of being the mother of that infant
Posted by: TeddyZ | September 1, 2008 5:23 PM | Report abuse
A fundamental question. How old is the father? If he impregnated Bristol when she was under 18 (which, of course he did) and he was OVER 18, then statutory rape was committed. This is not an indiscretion by two teen-agers. According to the law, it is a crime. When an 18-year-old African-American football star had oral sex with his 16-year-old girlfriend, he was sentenced to prison. Guess there is another standard for the children of the powerful than there is for the children of the powerless.
Posted by: George M. | September 1, 2008 5:23 PM | Report abuse
McCain made his own future difficult, squarely due to lack of judgment or due to horrible judgment. He should even quit being a senator. RNC has time to pick a new candidate altogether. Have courage, and begin the clean up of your party in national interest.
A maverick does not jump into a situation after being informed or warned of information, and yet without any preparation. This is how Bush and RNC handled Katrina 3 years, as cake walk (or cut the cake and eat it too at McCain's birthday party) while Katrina hovered over NOLA. Old habits get you, but he or RNC will not be allowed to screw this great nation, USA.
Posted by: O.P. Neon | September 1, 2008 5:23 PM | Report abuse
Who is the father and how old is he? Is he 18,or 19 or 20? Could this be considered statutory rape? Remember the 16yr old in Georgia who went to jail for statutory rape for having sex with a 15 year old?
Posted by: Steve | September 1, 2008 5:22 PM | Report abuse
I can only IMAGINE the response in the news and all over right-wing TV and radio if Obama had a 17 year-old, unwed and pregnant daughter. Let's face it, Democrats once again are warned to not say anything. Yet if this were an Obama baby, the hypocritical repubs would be all over it, salivating on Faux News.
Posted by: Jason | September 1, 2008 5:22 PM | Report abuse
I believe John McCain will be having a "Harriet Myers" moment pretty soon and announce (or have Palin announce) that due to extreme family concerns she will not be seeking office.
Posted by: Carl Johnson | September 1, 2008 5:22 PM | Report abuse
You write "Bristol Palin's pledge to marry the father of the child gives social conservatives something to latch on to if they are looking for positives out of this situation."
Nowhere in the Palin statement does it say that she is marrying the father of the child.
Posted by: Mike | September 1, 2008 5:22 PM | Report abuse
"Is this the first time a black bastard son is running for the Democrats for President?"
Nah, the last was Clinton in '92.
Posted by: All-M-T | September 1, 2008 5:22 PM | Report abuse
Nothing to see here but libs complaining about a ticket which has become more dynamic than theirs.
Keep whining to yourselves libs.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:21 PM | Report abuse
The bottom line is blatant hypocrisy in the part of Ms Palin and extreme opportunism of McCain who doesn't know the meaning of vetting. When did he apologize for his outrageous joke of Chelsea Clinton having been conceived by Janet Reno as her father? And now complaining about a real case of an unmarried teenager having a baby. McBush is a despicable character.
Posted by: J.Moreno | September 1, 2008 5:21 PM | Report abuse
Who cares?
Honestly. We don't care. McCain chose her as VP to distract from the real issues at hand.
Posted by: The Left | September 1, 2008 5:21 PM | Report abuse
Is the boyfriend over 18? If he is it's statutory rape and he should be prosecuted. It's a moral necessity.
Posted by: Timmy | September 1, 2008 5:21 PM | Report abuse
The conservative response? Fantastic! She's not a lesbian!
Posted by: f2 | September 1, 2008 5:21 PM | Report abuse
Reading the comments regarding the Palin pregnancy, proves that the citizens of the US are a degenerate, mongrel society, no longer worthy of being considered a great nation. They deserve to be a third world country governed by Blacks.
Posted by: RIck | September 1, 2008 5:20 PM | Report abuse
I used the words "Dukes of hazzard, Hillbillys, Backwoods trash.
By the way, am I the only one here who has ever lived in Alaska? Those people they think they live in their own private country. It is a "anything goes culture" and Palin was born there. I can't even imagine what they are going to find out about this family once they begin checking. How many prostitutes will turn up claiming her husband is a regular once some tabloid begins spreading some money around. These people are trash, I knew zillions like them. Drinking, drugs, sex, they are nuts up there, look at where they live? She already admitted she used drugs in the past. Want to bet she still does, so does her husband and maybe the kids. 12 year olds smoke dope up there. Wait till the Enquire gets ahold of someone and offers then a few hundred thousand to tell a few stories. Their best friends will rat them out. This family is "NOT" the Cleavers, trust me. I think it is over anyway she will be gone before the convention is over.
--------
Would you people stop using the term "white trash"???!! I don't care if you are white and saying it, its still racist. No one has used the "N" word regarding Obama, so don't use the "WT" words on Palin. If I can't call myself a proud, white woman without being called a racist, then for (insert the name of your maker here)'s sake, all skin tone comments are off limits! Nobody made a big deal about Obama's teen momma having a baby out of wedlock (and with a black man, no less! Oh my!) - embrace your free speech, but lets leave race out of it!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:08 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:20 PM | Report abuse
Is this the first time a black bastard son is running for the Democrats for President?
Please keep up the comparison.
Posted by: Peter | September 1, 2008 5:20 PM | Report abuse
LOL, thanks for the link Pete http://www.veeppeek.com thats really a funny site., That other link to the image that someone else left., with Palin holding a gun in a bikini.,.... I dont think that is real. That is a photo shop.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:19 PM | Report abuse
No one cares
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:19 PM | Report abuse
Juno is a way of life in McCain-ville!
Palin does not look knocked up in any of her photos from that period. Her daughter was taken out of high school for several months because she had "mono."
It's a shame the GOP convention wasn't in Chicago cause Palin and her group would be the perfect guests on Spinger. Or perhaps they'll be appearing on Maury's "Whose Your Momma" Special.
This just shows that if you don't raise your kids right, they get knocked up like the family dog.
Posted by: foetine | September 1, 2008 5:19 PM | Report abuse
I love wolf it takes great with moose nose jelly.
Posted by: Yummy | September 1, 2008 5:19 PM | Report abuse
Sarah and Todd Palin have issued the following statement: "We’re proud of Bristol’s decision to have her baby..."
Interesting. I see that this was Bristol's DECISION and they are proud of her DECISION. They are glad that she exercised her CHOICE.
They are in deed (if not in word) pro-choice.
Posted by: Linguist | September 1, 2008 5:19 PM | Report abuse
How I love to be called a "horrible homoselxual"....ah those great Christian values hard at work again...
Now, lets talk about traditional family values....oh wait, cant here....
- Knocked up!
- Who's there?
- Palin
- Palin who?
- Palin comparison to the Democratic ticket
Posted by: Steven | September 1, 2008 5:18 PM | Report abuse
I'm a non-religious secular humanist myself, but having been brought up in a Christian family and knowing how Christians think, I am pretty sure that they will see Bristol as the imperfect sinner who, nevertheless, trusting God's compassion and forgiveness, repented from her sins by keeping her baby and vowing to marry her boyfriend.
Actually, the fact that the Palin women have now chosen not only once, but twice, to keep their babies in adverse circumstances where they could have otherwise chosen an abortion makes them heroes in the eyes of the religious right !
Posted by: Mbruno | September 1, 2008 5:18 PM | Report abuse
Making excuses within 72 hours --
Can a withdrawal of name for consideration be in the cards.
I suspect Laura Bush may have time on her hands, (not that far fetched).
Posted by: Al | September 1, 2008 5:18 PM | Report abuse
Would you people stop using the term "white trash"???!! I don't care if you are white and saying it, its still racist. No one has used the "N" word regarding Obama, so don't use the "WT" words on Palin. If I can't call myself a proud, white woman without being called a racist, then for (insert the name of your maker here)'s sake, all skin tone comments are off limits! Nobody made a big deal about Obama's teen momma having a baby out of wedlock (and with a black man, no less! Oh my!) - embrace your free speech, but lets leave race out of it!
~~~~~~
Didn't you know that if you were a conservative you are by defaul you're a racist, homophobic, bigot, sexist who likes to beat old ladies with their canes and attend weekly cross burnings? LOL
Hey it is okay if Barry's mom had him when he was 18 and his daddy sired several kids out of wedlock, he is the Chosen One and can do no wrong.
Posted by: White Trash! | September 1, 2008 5:17 PM | Report abuse
I can't believe the ridiculousness of the accusation that Trig is actually her daughter's baby. It reminds me of how people thought that McCain's ADOPTED daughter was the result of an affair between McCain and a dark skinned woman.
The child was adopted out of an orphanage in Bangladesh, and people turn a kind act into a depraved one.
It's the same situation here. Palin chooses to have a child with down syndrome, and people have to find some way to attack her.
I would bet that most of the people spreading these lies don't believe them, but think that this will help Obama in the election.
DISGUSTING!
Posted by: d | September 1, 2008 5:17 PM | Report abuse
What's your point? She isn't gay like Cheney's daughter, she is not ugly and homely like Jimmy Carters daughter? Go ahead and throw the first stone if you have nothing bad in your own family background. It is life, and had nothing to do with elections.
Posted by: Jim | September 1, 2008 5:17 PM | Report abuse
"LETS BE FAIR! YOU CAN"T BLAME THE BLACK MAN FOR THIS ONE.LOL!"
Let's wait till see the baby before we say that.
Posted by: Mike | September 1, 2008 5:17 PM | Report abuse
Just some opinions:
* Candidate McCain seems to be a different person with lesser values than Senator McCain.
* Palin is certainly charming and may (and that's a big may) be capable of being VP, and possibly the President, someday. She simply just doesn't have enough experience to potentially run this country today. Charm does not qualify a person to be the Vice President of the United States.
* If Palin had buck teeth and was obese (and not so front page worthy), I don't think McCain would have chosen her - good looks do not qualify a person to be VP.
* It is a very real possibility that Palin could have to deal with an upset China, Iran, and/or Russia as president, simultaneously and successfully working with Congress - this scares me to death.
* It seems pretty obvious that McCain is using Palin to get Hillary voters, i.e, she was not chosen because she was the best choice. This is dangerous and wrong on many levels, but essentially McCain is willing to jeopardize America's future and safety (remember, she could be pres someday if McCain wins) to become president. Also, what does this say about Palin's values, to allow McCain to use her for these votes.
* Sorry McCain supporters, but he is not smart enough to have created "The Palin Stir". Karl Rove has got to be behind this - the same person that crafted Bush's two election wins. And look where we are today.
* We haven't heard her positions on anything except abortion, gun rights, being a hockey mom, and the Alaskan good ole boy network. Last time I checked, America is in deep trouble in many areas besides these.
* Her degree in journalism/communications just doesn't give me a very warm fuzzy feeling.
* It was hipocritical for McCain to bash Obama on experience, and then pull this. I don't care what kind of spin someone puts on it.
* The media knows Palin is not qualified to be VP, but is keeping this story alive for ratings. This is stirring the Bush/McCain base, which could have dangerous consequences. If McCain becomes Pres, and god forbid falls ill or worse, Palin would be our President. If America continues to fall further into a hole because of Palin's incompetence, then god help John McCain, Karl Rove, and the media for orchestrating and allowing it to happen, for votes and ratings.
If you've decided to vote for John McCain, and it's because you truly believe in his message and agenda, then these "opinions" won't affect you. If you're still trying to figure out if Palin is "the real deal", please just think about how much you really know about this person and her real qualifications. America's future at stake.
Posted by: Jeff | September 1, 2008 5:17 PM | Report abuse
The problem here is the continual hypocrisy of the far Right -- they act holier than thou and then are constantly exposed for being more corrupt, immoral and unethical than all liberals combined. That said, this is a perfect to argue for Pro-Choice: Bristol had the choice to use her body by spreading her legs, so why deprive other young women the right to use their bodies as they see fit?
Hypocrisy...
Posted by: Hypocrisy | September 1, 2008 5:17 PM | Report abuse
What if Bristol isn't pregnant at all? What if this pregnancy story was leaked just to squash the rumors about Sarah not being Trig's mother. After all if Bristol is "about five months along" now as a Palin aide put it, she couldn't have given birth to a baby back in April. After a few months we'll probably learn that Bristol has had a miscarraige. I'm afraid this is a real possibility.
Posted by: Nancy | September 1, 2008 5:16 PM | Report abuse
Democrats should keep up the assaults on Sarah Palin's pre-natal care decisions, the insinuations about Bristol Palin's promiscuity and the libelous allegations about a Downs Syndrome child.
These are winning issues for you...
Posted by: Winston Smith | September 1, 2008 5:15 PM | Report abuse
I have been battling this rumor on the Obama campaign's listserv. I think that Sarah Palin is a ditz as well as a ditzy reactionary, and if John McCain should win the election and die in office she would be one of history's funnier extreme disasters. I never think it is alright to slander people, particularly not with such a sleazy story! The Obama listserv managers ahve been trying to squash the discussion with little success; it keeps re-emerging.
The story never made any sense. I examined each piece of evidence. There are a bunch of photos of Palin with her belly out of sight concluding that they show her to not look pregnant. There is a photo of Briscol looking four and a half to five months pregnant six weeks before the full term baby was born in mid April. The baby was born exactly four and a half months ago, Bristol looked four to five months pregnant exactly six months ago, and Bristol is at this time five months pregnant; and five months pregnant adds up in terms of an end of December due date. Bristol could not have looked four to five months pregnant six weeks before giving birth to a full term infant, and she could not be five months pregnant and have had a child four and a half months ago. And is it the case that Palin was never pregnant, or that it was irresponsible of her to fly home in the earliest stage of labor, make up your minds! Finally a photograph by CBS has emerged of a full length view of Palin looking extremely pregnant, in her eighth month of pregnancy. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/8/31/234157/516/1017/581734 The worst possible scenario is that Bristol was pregnant, was disappeared, and miscarried, and quickly became pregnant again, to the resignation of her family, all independently of her mother's pregnancy.
I do have to notice three things. First, the history of each statement from the media that fed into the birth of this rumor suggests that its roots lie in a particularly strange political atmosphere. Reporters in even respectable newspapers and TV networks pick with her in the most outrageous ways and get away with it. Reporters were really commenting publicly that they doubted that she was really pregnant, and they sounded like school girls, or nasty rural villagers gossiping. "She doesn't look pregnant to me." I saw her two months ago, and she didn't look pregnant then." "She didn't have no baby, she could never have flown home in labor, and the staff on the plane didn't know anything about it!" From teh tone of that discussion, I'm seriously surprised that she wasn't said to have cast a spell and caused someone's moose to drop dead. Maybe Alaska is a far more nasty place than any place else, and for sure it's coming across as Neanderthal in the matter of her wanting her brother in law fired from his job as state trooper for threatening violence against her family; it seems that few people in Alaska can imagine what he did wrong. But I am picking up that Sarah Palin is the most deeply and universally despised state governor in American history, that almost noone in her own state respects her, to such a degree that TV and newspaper reporters don't think they even have to pretend to show her basic respect. Such a lack of fear of failing to treat teh state governor with basic respect due another person is unprecedented. That reality certainly flies in the face of being able to think that people see her as a hero who has confronted corruption in the government. And noone wins that level of disrespect by standing up to a cop brother in law who threatened your sister and your family, probably not even in Alaska.
Second, the tone taken by the people advancing this view on the Obama listserv as well as the slimy, nasty-nasty, gossipy nature of the story itself, strongly suggest to me that a true source of the popularity of this story is water seeking its own level. The story itself and the arguments about it look exactly like highschool students writing on the bathroom wall, and Sarah Palin comes across as a backwoods rural highschool cheerleading diva. The people advancing this rumor pretty exactly resemble Sarah Palin in character, maturity, and intellect, and that is what is attracting them to her.
Third, the tremendous, insistent popularity of this story and its refusal to die when confronted with the evidence, remind me of the Swift Boat story. John Kerry is one of those people who has no backbone, and cannot tell the truth nor give a straightforward answer about anything to save himself. I noticed that about him very early on. As a liberal Democrat I did not vote in the last election and liked George Bush better, like most people I knew (many of whom also voted for George Bush). I myself repeated the Swift Boat story. I never cared if it was true, and I don't think many people cared if it was true. The Swift Boat story was like the story of Washington and the Cherry Tree; a myth, that gets its power from the way it captures what people think of and how they feel about someone. The Swift Boat story summed up and mobilized what people massively thought of John Kerry, and that was what gave life to the story. People don't really care if Palin adopted her daughter's baby and is now lying about it; the story sums up what the world thinks of her. That she was really pregnant with her own son is apparently the first time she has ever told the truth or been straightforward about anything, unless number one was that she opposes abortion rights. And since she's an extremist, we expect her to handle family issues in extreme, abusive ways. The reality that the 17 year old girl will marry the boy is not enlightened and kind parenting, especially not given the awkward, distant, wants no part of this way she was recently photographed holding her baby brother for a photo shoot of Palin's and McCain's children.
Frankly, Sarah Palin is impossible to respect, and hard not to laugh about, never mind that the little bit of substance she has shown should make us very, very afraid. The Republicans had better withdraw her from nomination if they know what's good for them. Never mind what's good for the country.
Yours,
Dora Smith
Austin,TX
Posted by: Dora Smith | September 1, 2008 5:15 PM | Report abuse
"The child is always carrying Trig to hide her pregnant belly. It's not rocket science.
Posted by: ecdc | September 1, 2008 5:13 PM"
So Palin is literally using one child to hide issues with another?!!!!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:15 PM | Report abuse
Voice of Reason couldn't have said it better. But just to add a bit more to the issue of the economy and how best to manage it, I think the best insight's come from the wealthiest of all Americans. Warren Buffet, although a hugely successful hedge fund manager, beleives our economy fares best with a progressive tax policy. He has been one of Obama's chief financial advisors, chiefly because he realizes that Obama has the intellect and willingness to understand the complexities involved. Buffet is a populist with a vision of a society made up of a prosperous middle/working class. His insights into the inner workings of our economy are lost on McCain, who has such little attentiveness to his own financial situation he doesn't even remember how many homes he has.
Posted by: Robin from Colorado | September 1, 2008 5:14 PM | Report abuse
Ever watch the "To catch a predator" dog and pony show on NBC? Those guys only thought/fantasized about it, this Alaska man actually did the dirty deed. Quit prosecuting the men that have a 18 or 19 year decoy acting like a 14 year begging these men for sex. Right is right, but then, this ain't no TV show selling million dollar commercials. Or is it? I say the decoy has to marry the guy that shows up, and the men get that idiot NBC reporter as a father-in-law. Now that's justice. They dated 3 years but only did it once when she was 16. Yeah, right....
Posted by: Johnny b good | September 1, 2008 5:13 PM | Report abuse
I like Palin, Her kid gettin pregnant just shows that she has to deal with the same stuff as the rest of us. There are other scandals with her that hold more wieght you can see them at http://www.veeppeek.com
Posted by: Dann | September 1, 2008 5:13 PM | Report abuse
The child is always carrying Trig to hide her pregnant belly. It's not rocket science.
Posted by: ecdc | September 1, 2008 5:13 PM | Report abuse
Watch these videos and decide who is real Trig's mother.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:12 PM | Report abuse
"Just think about it like this, if it were Obama's daughter that got knocked up we'd never know. That girl would be off to an abortion mill before the piss dried on the Clear Blue Easy stick. Remember Obama's motto for abortion, "If at first you don't succeed, put the baby in the trash." "
This comment is sick, disgusting and an outright LIE! Obama NEVER said to thorw babies in the trash.
Just because one is PRO-CHOICE, does not mean one is pro-abortion. Millions of people beleive in a woman's right to choose but would not suggest abortion as the "remedy" to an unwanted pregnacy. It is smears like this one against Obama that fuel hatred, devisiveness, and backlash.
Posted by: kasha | September 1, 2008 5:12 PM | Report abuse
I feel sorry for most of the liberals on this thread. Your lack of character is showing. The liberal idealist eutopia is just as big of a religion as conservative religions, and you are bigots and hypocrits who use the same faith based "morality" but call it idealogy as the people you criticize.
Some of the classic liberals in the democratic party still retain tolerance, ability to disagree and compromise, open mindedness, etc but most of you are a disgrace.
~~~~~
The Democratic Party of Truman, FDR and JFK is no more. If the Democratic party is not careful the liberal base will completely destroy this once great party I use to be proud to call my own.
Posted by: Ashamed Democrat | September 1, 2008 5:11 PM | Report abuse
Is this a real picture? http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/8969/1220293607509ba8.jpg
If so-- She should go to prison for desecrating the flag.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:11 PM | Report abuse
Palin just repaired that glass ceiling that Hillary spent so much effort to crack.
Posted by: K Ackermann | September 1, 2008 5:10 PM | Report abuse
I don't care about her teenage daughter having a baby. I AM MORE CONCERNED ABOUT HER RUNNING FOR VP WITH A SPECIAL NEEDS CHILD UNDER 1 YEAR OLD! I have a special needs child in my family & know FIRST HAND JUST HOW MUCH WORK IT TAKES TO RAISE A CHILD WITH SPECIAL NEEDS!
I do not have a problem with her running, just not right now! This child needs her COMPLETE ATTENTION for the next few years! I really don't think that she can do that & run for VP at the same time! Just the fact that she considered running tells me where her priorities actually lie!
Posted by: Michael Souza | September 1, 2008 5:10 PM | Report abuse
The left has completely lost their mind over this pick. Within hours of the announcement, the rumors about baby Trig were already floating from Marcos Moulitsa's cesspool to every leftist blog and discussion forum on the internet.
The party that is all about women's "choices" (as long as they approve of them) is now demanding Palin step down and dictating to her what she should and shouldn't do. Look at some of the comments from the bigoted misogynists in the comments here. Sarah Palin is a monster because she chose to give birth to a baby with Down syndrome and her teenage daughter is pregnant and NOT getting an abortion? Sarah Palin shouldn't work, she should stay home with the children?
This is coming from the LEFT. The conservatives and libertarians are supporting Palin and the choices her family has made. The left is telling them what they should do. Who are the fascists?
Posted by: Patricia_g | September 1, 2008 5:09 PM | Report abuse
8 writes:
"One BIG question remains unanswered: if this father were going to marry Bristol Palin, why hasn't it happened yet??"
Because he probably just found out he was getting married.....the day Palin accepted McCain's offer.
Give her time to fly back to AK (or her burly hubby), load her moose gun and help him pick out the wedding music LOL.
Posted by: MA | September 1, 2008 5:09 PM | Report abuse
After 8 years of "No Limit Texas Hold'em" Bush, we now have "Yahtzee" McCain.
Posted by: rixxk | September 1, 2008 5:09 PM | Report abuse
You are stupid... If Bristol got impregnated by a 26 year old the she's made a mistake. What does that have to do wihth Palin? And what does that have to do with McCain?
~~~~~
I'm a republican. I think if it is true that the father of Sarah's grandchild is 26 that she should step down as vp. She should let someone else less marred be on the ticket. I don't like obama, but he will win if this is actually true.
Posted by: Dissapointed | September 1, 2008 5:01 PM
Posted by: Samantha in Tulsa | September 1, 2008 5:08 PM | Report abuse
Would you people stop using the term "white trash"???!! I don't care if you are white and saying it, its still racist. No one has used the "N" word regarding Obama, so don't use the "WT" words on Palin. If I can't call myself a proud, white woman without being called a racist, then for (insert the name of your maker here)'s sake, all skin tone comments are off limits! Nobody made a big deal about Obama's teen momma having a baby out of wedlock (and with a black man, no less! Oh my!) - embrace your free speech, but lets leave race out of it!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:08 PM | Report abuse
Anonymuos wrote:
"Sarah Palin should step down NOW if she wants to have any political future. If McCain loses in November, the party will pin it squarely on her ......"
This is exactly true. I also read that is why McCain is the GOP pick to begin with, in a year when the GOP is said to be the losing ticket.
The VP on the losing ticket is almost always toast. Their political future is done with.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:08 PM | Report abuse
Very sorry - I posted same thing twice. Read only one, lol...
Posted by: Cindy Owens | September 1, 2008 5:07 PM | Report abuse
This teenage pregnancy scandal is irrelevant to the issues facing our country. People need to do their research and chose next leader based on their policies and political past. We need someone who will address and deal with current issues and not pass it to next generation to handle: national debt, global warming, foreign politics, immigration reforms, fall and weakening of the dollar! Let's not pick the next president based on irrelevant to politics issues, like VP's daughter's pregnancy. Teenage pregnancies do happen,and people should not waste time putting blame on others. Palin is a very accomplished lady, and personal family issues happen to all of us. I am not a republican, but I do support basic republican ideas of small government and fiscal conservatism. The reason why I DO NOT vote republican is because the last 3 republican presidents did not represent these values! In fact during G.W. Bush's administration this country has accrued more national debt than under all previous administrations combined!!! This country needs an open-minded leader who can fairly represent ALL ethnicities and religious views of America and strengthen the middle class, and give middle class tax breaks and not favor the top 1% at the expense of the rest of us! Middle class is the backbone of the strong country! America: please do you research on policies offered and base your vote on that, not on some 'dirty-laundry' issues!
Posted by: Elizabeth R. | September 1, 2008 5:07 PM | Report abuse
McCain didn't know. If he had known, he would have released this along with the other dirt, like the trooper and the downs syndrom baby. This shows a lack of due diligence and poor judgement, on both McCain's and Palin's part. They shouldn't run the country for 4 years.
Posted by: Peter | September 1, 2008 5:07 PM | Report abuse
Just think about it like this, if it were Obama's daughter that got knocked up we'd never know. That girl would be off to an abortion mill before the piss dried on the Clear Blue Easy stick. Remember Obama's motto for abortion, "If at first you don't succeed, put the baby in the trash."
~~~~~~~~~~
Agreed. The media would completely cover it up and if it was found out they would blame it on someone, probably President Bush because he seems to be the doer of all that is evil in the world (according to liberals that is).
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:06 PM | Report abuse
The real impact has very little to do with how the pregnancy plays with the voters in any direct sense. The real impact is that this is a crucial time as the voters try to figure out who Sarah Palin really is and she's not getting the opportunity to define herself. Instead of the media giving Palin the kind of air time she needs, they're focusing on Hurricane Gustav and the pregnancy story.
It's not necessarily going to turn out badly for the Republicans, but I can't think of any similar situations in the past that turned out well for those involved.
Posted by: Thomas Eagleton | September 1, 2008 5:06 PM | Report abuse
Liars, is the only point here, cast the first stone types always get this in return. Trust me folks, this is only the beginning, living in an isolated village and state is much different when the spotlight shines on you and your family. Todd et al, and his associateions, the kids drug problems and sexual freedom will be the next agenda. And the music will sound a lot like, where were you Gov' when all this crap was going on? Not judging, but just wait, it wont even be a week before all the issues that are considered normal in Alaska hits the lower 48.......it will be a long ride. I am an independent, and McCain could have gotten my vote with Romney or Pawlenty....but this makes him seem like a desparate moron.
Posted by: Wanker | September 1, 2008 5:06 PM | Report abuse
Obama's mom was 18 when she had Barack. does that make him less qualified to be pres or his mom a terrible mother? She helped raise a son who could be pres. Take it easy lefties......
Posted by: Kevin | September 1, 2008 5:06 PM | Report abuse
Ah, for the love of God, people--have you heard of Google?
As I tried to point out earlier, to deaf eyes obviously, there ARE photos of a pregnant Governor Palin during her last trimester.
Here is one for example:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/30076181@N02/2814199887/sizes/l/
And I'm sure it's not photoshopped, since the TV station would have the footage they shot with her in it.
Once again, let's place ourselves back at THAT point in time; Palin has no clue that McCain is going to even consider her, he had only just then cinched the nomination, so I'll reiterate my question: What huge conspiracy did she even need at that point to fake her pregnancy, and wouldn't any number of Bristol's friends have had at least a clue if she was expecting?
So please, would all of the conspiracy loons (yes, even you "Barack-Is-a- Muslim" nutjobs, too) go play in another sandbox? Thank You!
Posted by: chirlee | September 1, 2008 5:05 PM | Report abuse
The October surprise and its only september The first!
Posted by: John Doug | September 1, 2008 5:05 PM | Report abuse
Every time something Jon McCain does that is so outrageous, i get caught up in the fray. Then I come to my senses.
John McCain supports Barack Obama.
YThe man can't be dumb enough to think Americans would want this person running the country.
John McCain is going to vote for Barack Obama.
Posted by: OneFreeMan | September 1, 2008 5:04 PM | Report abuse
It's almost like the news of Bristol's pregnancy was rushed into circulation, not because of rumors that little Trig is Bristol's child, but to camouflage Palin's close association with the indicted Ted Stevens and his 527 fund raising organization.
What we're seeing here both a disfunctional family and a disfunctional political party, where Sarah's refomer credentials are being shattered, not challenged, every single day. The heat of even the most superficial scrutiny is melting the Alaskan image of pristine frozen tundra and its supposedly rugged, hard working, morally pristine inhabitants.
It seems that the easiest way for us in the lower 48 to understand the true Alaska that is coming to light is to watch a few reruns of "Northern Exposure."
Posted by: Deja Vue | September 1, 2008 5:04 PM | Report abuse
As an Arizonan I have voted for Senator McCain for many years. Due to his choice of VP I can no longer support him and will vote for OBAMA. Many of my Republican friends are doing the same. This whole situation has become a circus. Very sad indeed.
Posted by: CM | September 1, 2008 5:04 PM | Report abuse
Look at the picture at the top of this column. There are some deep, dark secrets going on there.
~~~~~
Could say the same thing about Obama and his past and political record.
Posted by: HYPE | September 1, 2008 5:04 PM | Report abuse
The republicans are telling liberals to be VERY careful?
The republicans can smoke my pole. I'm pretty sure they can STFU!
They are a cult of lying degenerates and mental defectives.
Don't you cram your 'values' down our throats. I don't want my daughter thinking there is anything acceptable about this. Palin should come out and explain to teens that her daughter just threw her chances of college and travel right in the toilet.
She's going to be a 17-year-old strapped with some spawn, and a buck-toothed, teenage husband who's prospect for a better life probably includes a meth lab.
What will they name this one? Skeeter-Marie? Maybe she'll have triplets; Blinky, Buster, and Chowder.
Posted by: K Ackermann | September 1, 2008 5:04 PM | Report abuse
Bravo she's keeping her child SHE HAS A CHOICE, this news makes me want to fight harder for my ovaries to ensure the right to reproduce remains mine and mines only. If Palin's daughter can do it, surely all women should be allowed and celebrated.
I think Palin should give a speech supporting all the teenage mother's in the world, including those who aren't white and have a mother running as the VP. That would surely appeal to all sides.
Appeal to my Ovaries McCain/Palin, appeal to them or they'll vote for Obama (snickers).
Posted by: Cristi | September 1, 2008 5:03 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: whocares | September 1, 2008 5:03 PM | Report abuse
Dear Mother30's-ish.
It is only a punishment if the State forces the teenage girl to keep the baby against her will. If she wants the baby that is great! No involvement by the State, so no punishment.
Posted by: Argon | September 1, 2008 5:03 PM | Report abuse
Just now as CNN did the baby story Blitzer said they have someone one the way to Alaska right now. That can only mean they will be looking under every rock about Palin. I don't think we will even have to wait for the Enquire.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:02 PM | Report abuse
McCain presidensy will be so much fun! Let's do it!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 5:01 PM | Report abuse
first the trooper firing scandal, now a pregnant daughter. You can read about both of those and even more at http://www.theveep.com they have alot of background info on Palin.
Posted by: Pete | September 1, 2008 5:01 PM | Report abuse
Amazing looking at some of the comments here! First Obama does not engage in the politics of personal distruction unlike the Republicans. It's funny to read the right wingers complain about liberal bloggers when they invented the slime and rumour mongering through their heroes Hannity, Limbaugh, and the like.
Further McCain and company put up Palin as if she were Mother Theresa.
I can only imagine the right wingers who are now so proud of Palin would be saying if an Obama daughter were 17 and pregnant. Probably screaming about how "liberal " values are destroying our country .
Enough with the hypocracy.
Posted by: pb | September 1, 2008 5:01 PM | Report abuse
Apply the party's own standards to this case. Republicans do judge candidates on their parenting skills and results. If this were a Democratic daughter, the howls from the right would never end.
One BIG question remains unanswered: if this father were going to marry Bristol Palin, why hasn't it happened yet??
Posted by: chain8 | September 1, 2008 5:01 PM | Report abuse
I'm a republican. I think if it is true that the father of Sarah's grandchild is 26 that she should step down as vp. She should let someone else less marred be on the ticket. I don't like obama, but he will win if this is actually true.
Posted by: Dissapointed | September 1, 2008 5:01 PM | Report abuse
Palin may turn out to be a good v.p. candidate, but she is not being a good mother. i had a kid at 17 and my mom helped me out and this enabled me to get the education i needed to fully support myself and my child. because i had a kid at a young age, there are many things that i could not do (both professionally and recreationally) because i needed to be there for my child. i chose to be a teacher instead of going to law school. i put my family first. i am still a career woman, but i am there for my child when she goes to bed, when she wakes up in the morning, and after school. my child is now 16, and believe me, if she came to me and said she was pregnant, it would not be a surprise because i know when to expect my daughter's monthly. it seems to me that palin can go on with this presidential race, but anyone who has been through this situation knows that something or someone is going to have to lose out - either the country or her family. she can't attend to both.
Posted by: melanie | September 1, 2008 5:01 PM | Report abuse
McCain and Palin kind of got lucky, Gustav is taking all the media attention away from the fact that Palin was involved in some kind of trooper scandal and now her daughter who is 17 is prego. These would be the top story other wise. read more on both scandals at the veep http://www.veeppeek.com
Posted by: Peter | September 1, 2008 5:00 PM | Report abuse
You know what is funny repub beat you over the head with the bible but when they do something wrong according to the bible. The same logic dose not apply to them or they would be forgiven by good. What is SICK about this is that if they were the obama girls the repub would have crucified the family. The issue should be on sarah palin,and if she can be a good vp. That is the logical argument to make, but as it is repub we are dealing with logic and facts are not there strong suit. So, I WOULD LOL TO THE POINT OF PEEING MYSELF AND THE HYPOCRITES WHO CALL THEMSELVES REPUB DEFENDING PALINS DAUGHTER ACTONS. YOU ALL LOVE TO KNOW WHO IS SLEEPING WITH WHO. NOW IT COMING BACK TO HAUNT YOU. WHAT IF THE SON TURNS OUT TO BE GAY LOL LOL LOL
Posted by: Proof | September 1, 2008 5:00 PM | Report abuse
Just...wow...
Palin is running as a Creationist, Pro-Lifer and has no opinion on issues deemed highly important in light of today's economics and our plummeting position in the world's opinion of our policies. However, on the Day Gustov hits the Gulf Coast region, they quietly announce the Bristol Palin pregnancy story. As if they would be able to SNEAK it in, without anyone the wiser.
Blind, knucklescraping loyal-for-no-reason Republicans argue that we MUST not let a child's irresponsibility darken our perception of Ms. Palin's or ANY Republican's gleaming qualifications. Yes, Democrats do it as well. I'm not choosing to be either. But Palin's all-too-apparent and insatiable craving for the position of VP has revealed information about the many hours she gallavanted around the country prior to finally flying back to Alaska to give birth to her handicapped child. Not to sound cruel, BUT... if she had NOT already known of this child's disability, might she have made the wiser decision to STAY PUT and have her baby where she was at the time? I know I speak for many of the women in this country that would NEVER put all those hours in to travel, over concerns for the safety and health of our unborn child.
Or, as increasing information coming out reveals, was it really daughter Bristol in labor Sarah Palin was coming home to?
Let's all see just ONE measley photograph of an actual PREGNANT-LOOKING Sarah Palin in April! She was Alaska's Governor, for Pete's sake; there have to be pictures somewhere! Does she have some kind of Godfather hold over the state? I'd like to hear opposing viewpoints unburdened by predjudice or fear.
It seems kind of flaky that Bristol needed to be home all those months to recover from mono. If that were the case, it's strange that she managed to get PREGNANT while home-bound all that time.
Who was minding the store THEN?
It's simple, really. I am financially conservative but liberal when it comes to personal choice and beliefs. It's NOT like I give a rat's bum that poor Bristol is preggers. I don't really care one way or another. However, I do feel badly that her life is now such a glaring public fiasco. And all to save Mommy Dearest's rep. But vapid hypocrisy bothers me. DON'T state you believe in the monumental failure that is Abstinence-ONLY until marriage if you haven't even taught your own family members before you preach to our countrymen and women. I ask again, where were Ma and Pa Kettle when little Bristol was home-bound for MONTHS with a supposed case of mono?
The Republican ticket is a joke. I may not be 100% sure that Obama is fully qualified or not but Joe Biden is absolutely a winning choice! Honest and outspoken - I love that. If it means occasionally getting into a bit of hot water for speaking the truth, well, I'd rather see that then to regress into blind political correctness. That is where our media has failed us. Too much TMZ, not enough TLC... Kardashians instead of current events... you get the picture.
The only thing I DO know is that I would much rather take a chance on Obama for at least four years then four years of George McCain and Ma Kettle.
Oh, I could go on for hours but really, who has even read this all the way through anyway?
Yeah, yeah, and I can hear the "special", extreme right-wingers now...go ahead, bring it on. You're not gonna say anything I haven't already heard.
Posted by: Cindy Owens | September 1, 2008 5:00 PM | Report abuse
The GOP faithful (the hard-line Christian Right in particular) would be having a field day if the Dems had a woman on the ticket who had returned to work 3 days after giving birth to a child with Downes Syndrome, being a moralizer on abstinence also had a pregnant unwed minor teenage daughter, and instead of returning home to support her daughter, continued to pursue her own career ambitions. "Family values", White trash or in some places one in the same?
Posted by: sean | September 1, 2008 5:00 PM | Report abuse
Palin was actually McCain's second choice for vice-president after Ron Jeremy turned him down.
Posted by: Mike | September 1, 2008 4:59 PM | Report abuse
I am very bothered by the fact that a mother of a four month old special needs baby and a unwed teen made the decision to run for vice president. She is going to be on the road 24/7 and clearly her children need her supervision and support and yes I would be saying this if she were a man!
Posted by: C. Felton | September 1, 2008 4:59 PM | Report abuse
"In addition, Alaska statutory rape laws declare that anyone who is 18 years old or older who has sex with a person who is 16 or 17, or who is at least three years younger than the offender, can be charged with sexual abuse in the third degree. This is also a felony."
The whole situation is, well INSANE
I have not looked up Alaska law concerning adult sex with children, but having been exposed to the damage done to children by sexual abuse I am wondering???????
A) why would parents leave their child with a sex offender?
B) why would these parents promote the marriage of said child to this sex offender?
C) why are the local police not bringing charges against this man?
Posted by: grandma | September 1, 2008 4:59 PM | Report abuse
Sigh. Is this a vice presidential pick or an episode of "As the World Turns"? I keep hearing the commercial from the Soap Opera Network ("it's not over! it's never over") ringing in my ears when we COULD be having a conversation about the resurgent Russian bear, the Chinese who own most of our debt, the price of oil, health care, disappearing jobs, etc. If John McCain wanted a conservative woman he *could* have chosen Kay Bailey Hutchinson. If he wanted someone who could have leant heft to his team, he could have gotten Christine Todd Whitman or (for God's sake!) ELIZABETH DOLE!!! Shame on John McCain for turning a serious process into a soap opera.
Posted by: keriveri | September 1, 2008 4:59 PM | Report abuse
Sarah Spears, I mean Lynn Palin.. Whats her Name? Oh McBush Panic. PALIN is a VIRUS speading thru the dying (no pun intended) McCain campaign.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:59 PM | Report abuse
first the trooper firing scandal, now a pregnant daughter. You can read about both of those and even more at http://www.theveep.com they have alot of background info on Palin.
Posted by: Pete | September 1, 2008 4:59 PM | Report abuse
http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/8969/1220293607509ba8.jpg
F-ing Hot! I may switch my vote - nothing like a bikini-clad, gun toting VP
wow, I need to go now ;)
Nice Pick McCain
Posted by: Mike L. | September 1, 2008 4:58 PM | Report abuse
The reason she was chosen was so that she would appeal to Evangelicals.
She will no longer appeal to Evangelicals.
Therefore, she should be let off of the ticket.
Posted by: Marie Stewart | September 1, 2008 4:58 PM | Report abuse
Judging from the photos and facts, I think there is no doubt but that Bristol is Trig's mom. I think that there are only two possibilities:
1. This is Bristol's second baby. Mom and Dad agreed to bail her out for baby #1. But Bristol is gonna have to get married for baby #2.
2. Bristol isn't pregnant now. She still has some leftover pregnancy weight. When media was getting too close too uncovering the truth, the family attempted this cover-up. By saying she is five months pregnant now, they think that will convince folks that she couldn't be the mother of Trig. So they are asking for support and privacy for the unfortunate young teenage mom. I hope she doesn't have a "miscarriage" soon as a result of all of the media attention.
It's really too bad John McCain made this erratic pick. Looks bad for everyone. And the one that hurts the most is the poor young Bristol. Shame on you Sarah for subjecting your daughter to this!
Posted by: sbbritton | September 1, 2008 4:57 PM | Report abuse
Sarah Palin should step down NOW if she wants to have any political future. If McCain loses in November, the party will pin it squarely on her and this baby mama drama.
The whole situation is so surreal that I can't help but wonder if there is some Rovian strategy behind all of this. Did they vet Sarah knowing full well about this mess...anticipating the blow up...which would make a normally unacceptable choice like Romney or Jindal seem like the second coming?
Has Sarah Palin's hubris been totally exploited by her Republican masters? Notice they announced her as the Veep when they knew the hurricane was coming...what a fantastic opening for Jindal!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:57 PM | Report abuse
Just...wow...
Palin is running as a Creationist, Pro-Lifer and has no opinion on issues deemed highly important in light of today's economics and our plummeting position in the world's opinion of our policies. However, on the Day Gustov hits the Gulf Coast region, they quietly announce the Bristol Palin pregnancy story. As if they would be able to SNEAK it in, without anyone the wiser.
Blind, knucklescraping loyal-for-no-reason Republicans argue that we MUST not let a child's irresponsibility darken our perception of Ms. Palin's or ANY Republican's gleaming qualifications. Yes, Democrats do it as well. I'm not choosing to be either. But Palin's all-too-apparent and insatiable craving for the position of VP has revealed information about the many hours she gallavanted around the country prior to finally flying back to Alaska to give birth to her handicapped child. Not to sound cruel, BUT... if she had NOT already known of this child's disability, might she have made the wiser decision to STAY PUT and have her baby where she was at the time? I know I speak for many of the women in this country that would NEVER put all those hours in to travel, over concerns for the safety and health of our unborn child.
Or, as increasing information coming out reveals, was it really daughter Bristol in labor Sarah Palin was coming home to?
Let's all see just ONE measley photograph of an actual PREGNANT-LOOKING Sarah Palin in April! She was Alaska's Governor, for Pete's sake; there have to be pictures somewhere! Does she have some kind of Godfather hold over the state? I'd like to hear opposing viewpoints unburdened by predjudice or fear.
It seems kind of flaky that Bristol needed to be home all those months to recover from mono. If that were the case, it's strange that she managed to get PREGNANT while home-bound all that time.
Who was minding the store THEN?
It's simple, really. I am financially conservative but liberal when it comes to personal choice and beliefs. It's NOT like I give a rat's bum that poor Bristol is preggers. I don't really care one way or another. However, I do feel badly that her life is now such a glaring public fiasco. And all to save Mommy Dearest's rep. But vapid hypocrisy bothers me. DON'T state you believe in the monumental failure that is Abstinence-ONLY until marriage if you haven't even taught your own family members before you preach to our countrymen and women. I ask again, where were Ma and Pa Kettle when little Bristol was home-bound for MONTHS with a supposed case of mono?
The Republican ticket is a joke. I may not be 100% sure that Obama is fully qualified or not but Joe Biden is absolutely a winning choice! Honest and outspoken - I love that. If it means occasionally getting into a bit of hot water for speaking the truth, well, I'd rather see that then to regress into blind political correctness. That is where our media has failed us. Too much TMZ, not enough TLC... Kardashians instead of current events... you get the picture.
The only thing I DO know is that I would much rather take a chance on Obama for at least four years then four years of George McCain and Ma Kettle.
Oh, I could go on for hours but really, who has even read this all the way through anyway?
Yeah, yeah, and I can hear the "special", extreme right-wingers now...go ahead, bring it on. You're not gonna say anything I haven't already heard.
Posted by: Cindy Owens | September 1, 2008 4:57 PM | Report abuse
OK...I thought his choice of nominee was a slap in the face. He could have picked a much stronger, smarter, polished woman candidate. Yes, Sarah is a woman, a mother, and a leader...way to go, good for you. My issue is this? Why would you drag an infant from pillar to post on the campaign trail? Why would you subject a special needs infant to such treatment? Yes, as women, we do it all, we take on everything...but at what expense? at who's expense? Perhaps her message is that as mothers, we should be back to work 24 hours after delivery, or is it 4 weeks after delivery? what is it? Pro-life...hmmm it seems that is in conflict with quality of life. For those of you without adequate health care or inadequate jobs and benefits that must return to work so soon after childbirth...my heart goes out to you. This is a reality for some but the other side of reality is this: a child is paying the price.
The reality is this: there is premarital sex, right or wrong or we would not be discussing Bristol Palin. Lack of communication and awareness is evident in this family...how does a 17 year old conduct a relationship with a man nearly 25 years old and not get flack from parents. If she(Sarah Palin) is so conservative and Pro-life, then she should know what is going on in her household. Pro-life is not a license to breed irresponsibly. A 17 year old with access to the best healthcare, support system of two parents (supposedly, and good moral guidance should have a lower probability of getting pregnant outside of wedlock. This is a clear sign that something is missing in the household of Sarah Palin. Marrying the 17 year old to the father of the baby will not solve the problem in the Palin household either. The problem will still exist.
No, I'm feeling duped...we asked for butter and he gave us lard...What does this choice say about other republican women leaders in the country? Does McCain think we're (women) all weak as dishwater? Would he have felt that threatened to have someone with a stronger presence. he could have picked Heather Wilson or a host of other women that have more proven track records of running a family and their constituent's interests in their little corner of the country.
Posted by: Kim T. | September 1, 2008 4:57 PM | Report abuse
Mishi here in Utah we don't need no consent.
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 4:56 PM | Report abuse
People, people.... don't blame Sarah Palin for this debacale. She doesn't even know what a VP does on a daily basis, let alone how much media scrutiny would come with running for the VP slot. Give the gal a break. Had she known it was a public office on a national level, I don't think she would have ventured out of Juno, er, Juneau.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:56 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: mike hawk | September 1, 2008 4:56 PM | Report abuse
Mr.MCCain,"here you again". Lindsey Grahm
would have been a better pick
Posted by: Tommathew T.Thomas | September 1, 2008 4:56 PM | Report abuse
Shhhhhhh......whatever you do don't speak a word! We must not say anything about this because we've told we shouldn't. Why should it concern us anyway? After all this person who is running for VP could be the next President soon if the Republicans are elected in November. But....we should never ever mention anything about this subject matter because it involves a young teenage girl and she is pregnant and should have her privacy and we have no right to know anything or to say anything about this very extremely delicate issue!
Uhhh.......okay, but gosh! I mean, I thought that Governor Palin was a pro-lifer and against birth control and for abstinance. I'm confused here. Will someone please help me understand this? Okay....here's where I'm hung up. Does Palin think that it's just okay to engage in pre-marital sex at such a young age, without the protection of contraceptives? I mean...shouldn't I, as a voter, know how she feels about things like this? It seems reasonable to me to ask vital questions like this, especially in lieu of this latest development. Why is it that I have this nagging feeling in my gut that says to me that Governor Palin is somewhat irresponsible and probably not the greatest parent around? Could it be the way she handled her own pregnancy? Assuming she was indeed the one who was pregnant. After all, there are rumours to the contrary and this latest announcement doesn't really nullify those rumours. In a way it makes them appear somehow more plausible.
Am I condemning anyone here for this 'situation'? No, I really am not. I'm not condemning Palin or her daughter in the slightest. We are all humans and we all make mistakes. Some of us get caught and some of us don't. But basically what happens to us is because of the way we are raised and that's a fact. It seriously is a fact.
Psssssttttt.....don't tell anyone but I had a child out of wedlock when I was a teenager too. This is not a secret as I had it on my radio website and also spoke of it often on my radio talk show in which I spoke of True Love. I shared this information with my listeners and my fans not to make them think it was okay, but to let them know the truth and to help them to understand the consequences of what can happen when we don't follow the rules of society. I encouraged them not to be promiscuous ever. Now I'm not saying that I was promiscuous because I wasn't and I'm also not saying that Bristol was promiscuous. I have no idea what her sexual behaviour was like. But I will say this. I feel that I can blame my parents for what happened to me. Oh it was really my fault. Ultimately the fault was my own. I knew better. I really did! But the biggest reason I got pregnant was because the opportunity was there and the need to be loved. I had no supervision at that crucial time in my life and my parents were too busy with their own lives and work to wonder or even ask what was going on in my young life. I didn't have that "Leave it to Beaver" or "Father Knows Best" upbringing. Okay, most kids don't these days but the lack of moral values in our society today is not only shocking, it is alarming!
As for my own pregnancy, I chose to not have it terminated as well and was 'sent off' to a home for unwed mothers. My family didn't want me to marry the boy, who was too young to earn a living or to be a good father. The decision was reached by all concerned, including the boy's parents, that I would give the baby up for adoption. I felt at the time it was a good decision, even though it saddened me deeply. Unfortunately, when my baby was born it had an abnormality that would be fatal, within two weeks. When they informed me of his condition it was the most horrible news of my life. It was the first time I knew what depression was like.
The baby died and I went on with my life but I can assure you that it had a profound impact on how I would feel about this subject matter, birth control, teen pregnancy and family values for the rest of my life.
After I married later on (not pregnant I will add) I had two beautiful daughters. I began to teach them sexual responsibility at an early age, always encouraging them to use abstinance but knowing that there was a probability they would not, once they reached a certain age. At this age I arranged for my physician to give me birth control pills for them and when they reached the age of 16 I told them where the pills were and told them that if they ever felt the need to use them that I would prefer for them to do that than risk becoming pregnant. I in no way encouraged them to have sex prematurely or without being married but I wanted to do what I felt was the responsible thing. I told both my daughters that they could either tell me they were taking the pills or not tell me, but that I would prefer if they did. Now, to protect my daughter's privacy as I'm not running for public office, much less the Vice Presidency of the United States, I will not reveal if they chose to take them or not. I am only saying what I did. Neither of my daughter ever experienced what I did. The shame and the guilt and the experience of having a child out of wedlock and then the horror of having that child die. Another thing is this. I was there for them! And I was employed at the time as well. But I still was with my children and saw to their emotional needs as much as any parent I have ever known of.
I have no ill feelings toward Governor Palin and certainly none for her daughter, Bristol. I don't know if there is any basis for the rumours that the child known as Trig could also be the child of Bristol and as I have posted here before it would be of importance here in that if it was proven to be true it would also prove that she was involved in a lie and a cover-up and this would not be acceptable for the person who could conceivably be our next President one day.
What I think should happen here is that Governor Palin should quietly back out of this race for the Vice President and should go back to Alaska and take care of her family.
I think we, the American people, deserve a Vice President who is more responsible and more accountable and who will not threaten to take away the rights of women everywhere to use birth control as a means of contraception and also who would threaten to have Roe vs Wade struck down.
In ending let me also say this: God bless little Trig and God Bless young Bristol and the child she is carrying.
In fact I will go a step farther in saying "God bless the Palin family." But at the same time I call for her to suspend her campaign as running mate of John McCain's in the unfortunate event that they just might get elected in the fall.
If the last eight years haven't taught us something then we are impossible to educate.
We simply must insist on complete honesty and accountability in our elected officials and their conduct. And this involves events surrounding their families as well. When you run for Vice President of President you give up the right to hide things from the American people because it is so relevant to the way they would lead us as a nation.
It's really that simple!
~ Jazziette
Posted by: Jazziette | September 1, 2008 4:56 PM | Report abuse
It is difficult to discuss the human issues surrounding Governor Palin as a future Vice President without coming across as cruel and unkind.
Still, an individual compromises their privacy and that of their family when they enter the political arena. That is why candidates are supposed to be carefully scrutinized for skeletons in the closet BEFORE their names are submitted to the public for consideration.
The Clintons came to understand this first-hand ten years ago when John McCain joked about a then 17 year-old Chelsea Clinton, as he quipped, "The reason Chelsea Clinton is so ugly is that Janet Reno was is her father." (This incident is thoroughly documented by many well-known news sources.)
McCain later phoned President Clinton to personally apologize for this cruel attack on a young girl who was in no way a political figure. (I don't know if Senator McCain ever apologized to Janet Reno or Hillary Clinton.)
I initially was questioning whether or not it was appropriate for Governor Palin to set off for 60 days worth of campaigning, after just delivering a special-needs infant with Down's Syndrome, four short months ago?
Now I learn that the Family Values Republican Governor of Alaska also has a 17 year-old pregnant daughter, which would suggest that the child was having sex at least since the age of 16, if not earlier.
Unfortunately, a lot of children have sex far too early, but this is the Republican Party of Phyllis Schafly's Eagle Forum and all the Christian Coalition and religious fundamentalist folks, who along with Sarah Palin, oppose sex education in schools, which would at least give kids information on how NOT to get pregnant.
By the way, has anyone asked if Governor Palin's daughter's boyfriend was over 18 at the time he and her then-16 year old daughter conceived a child, and would this be statutory rape in Alaska?
Every family has challenges like teenage pregnancies, but would we concede that if this was one of Senator Obama's daughters being pregnant at 17, the religious conservatives would be publicly proclaiming that if Michelle Obama had been spending more time at with her family and supervising her children, instead of focusing on having a career, no one would be asking where were the parents?"
Are the soon-to-be parents now under enormous political pressure to marry, or for Governor Palin's daughter to deliver and raise this infant, rather than opt even for adoption?
At 17, is she really prepared to make a well-thought out decision, while in the spotlight of her mother's Pro-Life Vice Presidential campaign?
It appears that Governor Palin's reaction to her daughter's pregnancy, as to her own recent delivery, is simply continue spending more time away from home and campaigning for election, instead of devoting all her energies to her 4 month old special needs child and her 17 year old unwed daughter -- as well as her other 3 children.
And you must add to this saga of Governor Palin as a Family Values Republican, the issue of the Governor's sister being involved in a bitter divorce, with the news that the Governor's office had directed the State of Alaska Director of Public Safety to fire without cause Governor Palin's sister's ex-husband from his job as an Alaska State Trooper.
When the Director refused to allow his office to be politicized in this fashion, Governor Palin proceeded to fire the Director instead. This seems to be nepotism at its very worst.
I am sorry to say it, but "Trailer Trash" is starting flash through my head as this soap opera continues to unfold.
If it weren't for the hurricane threatening the Southeastern part of the US, would the news stations be doing a little more about covering this unfolding drama right now?
Does anyone not agree that McCain must begin contemplating whether or not to ask Governor Palin to withdraw her name from nomination?
Posted by: Michael in Arizona | September 1, 2008 4:55 PM | Report abuse
To Mbruno and others who think that Bristol's pregnancy simply shows that the Palin's are a regular, down-to-earth, working-class family, let me remind you that the Palin's have three houses (McCain has 5) and pull in $250,000 or so per year (though, admittedly, they have five kids).
While the Palins may not have the educational credentials of the Harvard-educated Obamas (Palin has only a bachelor's degree from the Univ. of Idaho, where she went after junior college), the Palins are absolutely no more "working class" than the Obamas or Joe Biden.
Both Michelle (from Chicago south side) and Barack Obama (son of a single, 18 year old mom) grew up surrounded by real poverty, as did Biden (born in the "Rust Belt" of PA) and really had to work their way out of it by staying on the straight and narrow.
I do agree that Bristol's pregnancy should be a private matter (not the subject of mudslinging), but I completely fail to see how the misstep of a premarital pregnancy somehow makes a family with three homes more "working class" than the Obamas and Biden who all came from low income backgrounds and have all tirelessly worked their entire professional lives to improve the lives of low-income families (versus, say, McCain who supports tax cuts for the *wealthiest* Americans and the big corporations on the basis that it will "trickle down" to the little guys).
Posted by: Voice of Reason | September 1, 2008 4:55 PM | Report abuse
Mishi - Like most US states, the age of consent in Alaska is 16. So your collective foolishness about felony sexual abuse is uninformed to say the least.
Posted by: Somebody | September 1, 2008 4:54 PM | Report abuse
I don’t know whether to laugh or vomit at the evangelicals. If Obama had a pregnant 17 year old daughter, the fundie wingnuts would be screaming that his own family demonstrates his moral inability to lead. But since it’s the GOP VP, they now gush over how wonderful a family the Palins are.
Sweet Jebus, deliver us from these self-righteous cretins.
Posted by: Scott | September 1, 2008 4:53 PM | Report abuse
FREEDOM OF CHOICE
Palin, the darling of the religious right, announces that her unwed daughter chose to engage in unwed sex and is now five months pregnant. McCain was aware of this fact when he chose Sarah to be his running mate. Now we know why the Republicon Convention was put on the back burner and we get 24/7 coverage of a hurricane that is going nowhere. The media would have interrupted the Democratic Convention midstream to make such an announcement had this been the daughter of one of Democrats candidates.
One thing the Republicons have shown over and over again is that they personally have no problem with the right to choose; that they do not practice what they preach. They choose to ignore the Bible, the Constitution, the rule of law, and common decency. Talk about freedom of choice; Republicons are the living embodiment of everything they oppose.
Posted by: Robert Castle | September 1, 2008 4:53 PM | Report abuse
It's sad how so many people can so easily blame another person. How many of the people who read this are without fault? HMMMM???? That's right, ZERO.
Posted by: Nope | September 1, 2008 4:53 PM | Report abuse
Plenty of stay-at-home Moms have had their daughter/sons involved in teenage pregnancies. She's not anti! The silly claims that she want to monitor people's sex lives has been dispoven! That she walks the talk about expecting people to be responsible for their actions and then supporting them is being manifested!
Posted by: SOYI | September 1, 2008 4:53 PM | Report abuse
I love how they say they are supporting her as they are about to stab her in the back.
-----------
FLASH FLASH
THIS IS ALL MOOT ANYWAY BECAUSE GOP FOCUS GROUPS ARE SAYING TO GET RID OF HER. LOOK TO SEE HER GONE BEFORE THE END OF THE CONVENTION.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:42 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:53 PM | Report abuse
I have a child that was born with a genetic disorder...And I carried her more than my wife when we where out in public. Why does the daughter always have this child in her arms and not dad?
If this child's last name was Obama, this race would be over.
Republican = HYPOCRIT
Posted by: OneFreeMan | September 1, 2008 4:53 PM | Report abuse
Yo, all you Goopers, less than 10 minutes remaining in the GOP's own online VP preference poll:
http://www.gop.mfbiz.com/#/newpalinbidenpoll/4530692820
Thus far Biden 94%, Palin 6%.
What a prize this pick has been!
Also, Joe Scarborough and Pat Buchanan are suppressing the urge to blow chunks:
Posted by: BGladd | September 1, 2008 4:53 PM | Report abuse
Sarah Palin is ready to be President but is not ready to do a press conference??? And the media rolls over on that???
That's why newspapers are closing.
Posted by: Pragmatist | September 1, 2008 4:52 PM | Report abuse
I feel bad for her daughter, I am more intersted in what Palin has done. They have some info on her at Veep Peek, About some scandal or something. Thats what people should be talking about. http://www.veeppeek.com
Posted by: Dave | September 1, 2008 4:52 PM | Report abuse
Hmm... I've been saying that all along. Todd Pail is the father of Bristol's retarded baby, Trig. Sex out of wedlock between father and daughter is a common practice here in Utah...I imagine in Alaska too. We need to investigate.
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 4:51 PM | Report abuse
Look at the picture at the top of this column. There are some deep, dark secrets going on there.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:51 PM | Report abuse
If it's true that Palin let her daughter be statutorily raped by a much older man, she should resign her nomination immediately.
Posted by: Alaskan | September 1, 2008 4:51 PM | Report abuse
I don’t know whether to laugh or vomit at the evangelicals. If Obama had a pregnant 17 year old daughter, the fundie wingnuts would be screaming that his own family demonstrates his moral inability to lead. But since it’s the GOP VP, they now gush over how wonderful a family the Palins are.
Sweet Jebus, deliver us from these self-righteous cretins.
Posted by: Scott | September 1, 2008 4:50 PM | Report abuse
Sarah Palin should step down.
We should not make a spectacle of her daughter, I agree. However, we need to look more closely at Sarah and Tod Palin . Shouldn't both parents be home supporting their pregnant 17 year old daughter and nurturing their new son as well? A daughter needs both parents at her side helping her through this difficult time. Family values are trumped by political aspiration.
Posted by: Joan | September 1, 2008 4:50 PM | Report abuse
If someone gives birth, she generally can not become pregnant again until she is no longer lactating. The notion that Bristol had one child four months ago, and was impregnated again *five* months ago is delusional at best.
Posted by: ak | September 1, 2008 4:50 PM | Report abuse
Now we know how Palin spells POTATO:
A-B-S-T-I-N-E-N-C-E---O-N-L-Y---E-D-U-C-A-T-I-O-N
Posted by: Bologna Vest | September 1, 2008 4:50 PM | Report abuse
17 year olds are not fit to be parents whether fiscally or maturity-wise or psychologically. This kid will live a much reduced life with a parent that is not ready for him/her. Bristol will lose her childhood because her parents didn't teach her well (like the millions of kids who aren't being taught well because of Republican policies) and this child will probably pass on the same flawed lessons to his/her kids.
The same, vicious cycle of stupidity, ignorance and inability to have straight talks about sex and contraception continues....
Posted by: evileconboy | September 1, 2008 4:50 PM | Report abuse
va2dc:
When I was pregnant with my first child, I was told to stay close to home as of 7 months. One month is not really premature, given that the 40 weeks of term pregnancy are a window, with two weeks on either side considered normal. Not only do babies come faster the more you have, but the pregnancies tend to get shorter. Still perplexed. Sorry.
Posted by: Mary in CT | September 1, 2008 4:50 PM | Report abuse
Nice OReilly reference!! :) :) Waaay too much Kool-Aid being passed around today. Is there another news channel that actually tells both sides? Or should we just rely on the Communist News Network and MSNBarackChannel for our updates?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:49 PM | Report abuse
Chris....this one isn't that hard to figure out. Palin is setting a bad example for the country. At a time when it is hard enough to get young people to delay intercourse or at least use condoms to protect against pregnancy and AIDS, the undeniable fact that Palin's daughter had unprotected intercourse at age 16 makes it all the more difficult for parents and other adults trying to influence young people's behavior. While what happened is a private matter, Palin knew it would become public when she accepted the offer of running for the vice presidency. The voters will come to resent her making this private matter public because this is behavior everyone wants to prevent.
Posted by: Steve54 | September 1, 2008 4:49 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "McCain officials said the news of the daughter's pregnancy was being released to rebut what one aide called 'mud-slinging and lies' circulating on liberal blog sites."
Why don't they just release the photos, medical records, etc. that prove that Gov. Palin is the mother of Trig? Wouldn't that be a lot easier way to "refute rumors" and more humane to Bristol than drawing even more attention to her by announcing that she's pregnant? There should be SOME photos of Gov Palin in the maternity ward with Trig, right? People do tend to take photos of special occasions like that...
Posted by: Tio-Neto | September 1, 2008 4:49 PM | Report abuse
Would explain why the baby is mentally chanllenged...
------------------------------------------
We should demand a paternity test. How much you want to bet Mr. Palin is the father?
Posted by: Hmm... | September 1, 2008 4:48 PM | Report abuse
My question to the repubs? Why is this a private matter now? Should the government be involve in peoples' personal decisions and lives?
Posted by: Youmightberight | September 1, 2008 4:48 PM | Report abuse
10 years' difference between sexual partners is a huge deal when one of the partners is a teenager. Our laws and the controversy surrounding this issue illustrates this. All of you asking why the father isn't being accused of statutory rape deserve an explanation. When behavior that can be defined as criminal in other situations happens in the circles of our civic leaders, it must be addressed openly, as a service to the public that the leaders serve. Daylight and transparency could work a little magic here, right Palin?
Palin should withdraw from the national campaign. That move would demonstrate that she does and can put her family first when necessary. It may also rescue some of her tattered credibility down the road.
The idea that she was even close to being a properly or extensively "vetted" candidate is laughable considering her political resume. Nobody knows anything about her ability to serve the public or what her judgment may resemble during a crisis that involved the majority of, or the entire country.
That McCain would choose her as a serious running mate cements for me that McCain lacks judgment and the mature logic that is required of the office of President.
As for Bristol, she is a teen who cannot see past the next few months, no matter how mature anyone may think that she is. I have a great deal of sympathy for her, and truly hope that she sees a viable future with the father since she now has very little choice in the matter. (any other option for handling the situation would offer dire political consequences for her mother - oh, there is never a "right" time for getting pregnant!) Bristol is certainly not the first nor the last child of a politician to be neglected by the politician-parent and railroaded by the political family. (enter Cheney's daughter) It is simply a tragic paradox that our highest level of public service involves such a grand amount of greed, selfishness and power-mongering.
By the way, "soccer mom" is another moniker for "soap opera mom". Palin may think that she is back in Fairbanks city hall duking it out with the other locals, but she is about to get a very large unpleasant dose of reality, as is her daughter.
Posted by: Bristol-gate spectator | September 1, 2008 4:47 PM | Report abuse
As a Republican pretending to be a Democrat, I am saddened by the behavior that I would engage in gleefully if this were a Democratic candidate. I am shocked by the lack of morals that you show in pointing out the immorality of this behavior that I would find immoral if I did not have a high tolerance for cognitive dissonance, and if it were not otherwise in my self-interest. Shame on you for believing in what I believe in when it aligns more clearly with what I have done in the past. Shame, I say!
Posted by: Marie Stewart | September 1, 2008 4:47 PM | Report abuse
There is only one Republican sin, one either enhances or detracts from the flow of money. If contributions begin to dry up because it is felt that Palin has too many irons in the fire, she will be asked to fall on her sword.
I agree with Obama, families are off limits, regardless of the Conservative agenda to interject their positions into all families.
Posted by: Ransome | September 1, 2008 4:47 PM | Report abuse
Uhmmm... this is a child molester! 26 years old? What is Palin thinking? He should be behind bars. Not marrying her daughter. OMG...
------------------------------------
The father is 26? It might be time to lock somebody up right? Just what's the legal age in Alaska? This was not the case of two teens having sex. It's a classic case of a cradle robbing, no game having grown man abusing the mind of a teen.
Where I come from he would be called a pimp and she would be considered getting ripened up for hooking!
Posted by: ConcernedParent | September 1, 2008 4:46 PM | Report abuse
As Rush Limbaugh once said Democrats hate hypocrites, Conservatives do not. His argument is that liberals have no values, therefore they are not hypocrites, conservatives have values, but are sinners, and therefore violate their values - thus hypocrites.
Obviously Rush is right that liberals condemn hypocrisy, but it is because they do have values.
I suspect that Palin will be supported by the far right. You can do what you want as long as you criticize those that do not share your values.
Posted by: fblaze | September 1, 2008 4:46 PM | Report abuse
Preaching, teaching, and summertime beaching ... life still happens.
McCain and Palin can count on my vote as well as my wife's.
Posted by: DCortez | September 1, 2008 4:46 PM | Report abuse
We should demand a paternity test. How much you want to bet Mr. Palin is the father?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:45 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: mike hawk | September 1, 2008 4:45 PM | Report abuse
Trig has the same letters as "grit"
========
I'm curious where the name Trig came from. Downs syndrome is called Trisomy - is trig a reference to that? Seems insensative. Also, I am not sold that she had that child - despite their convenient excuse. The photo's and weird facts just don't support it.
Posted by: Tony | September 1, 2008 4:40 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:45 PM | Report abuse
I think I feel bad for Bristol Palin. Now she has 2 children to raise - her own and her disabled brother, because her mother is too busy running around the country seeing to it that her ambitions are fulfilled and her henpecked father is coping by escaping from a house full of kids and a wife who is never around.
Posted by: Sparky | September 1, 2008 4:45 PM | Report abuse
Is anyone sick of right-wingers telling us that we despicable for being interested in this? Don't they realize that they put this all on the table when the impeached Clinton for...for...well, you know.
Posted by: Teven | September 1, 2008 4:45 PM | Report abuse
On one hand, I think this is a non-issue because it should not be of public concern(if there is lying, yes, but not the pregnancy). However, the republican party has demonized "sinners" and used "values" to sway votes for years. More importantly, they have used their "values" platform to harm/destroy "non-traditional" families. The Rep party cannot expect to run on "values" - and pry into the personal lives of others (even though they are the "limited gvt" party) - and not expect this to become an issue. It would most certainly be an issue if Biden's 17yo daughter was pregnant by a 26yo man. It's sad that her daughter has to go through this but this is not a problem that democrats created. This is a central republican issue. It's time gvt stops getting involved in (Christian defined) values and starts dealing with issues that gvts should address: health care, jobs with living wages, the economy in general, and peace around the globe, etc.
Posted by: GMT | September 1, 2008 4:44 PM | Report abuse
Tony I heard Trig is not Sarah's baby, but Bristol's. I eagerly await the next installment of the news to find out who indeed the father really is. I am giddy with the anticipation. But I aint queer.
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 4:44 PM | Report abuse
sweladi:
I do not follow just fox news sir or mam! I follow the candidates own words and Obama stated on more than one occasion that he would cut the budget so I think you should be in touch with what your candidate stands for.
Yes your candidate Mr. Obama considers the defense of our country waste. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7o84PE871BE
I believe this is Obama right????
I do know what I am talking about do you? Put the kool aid down and pay attention!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:44 PM | Report abuse
Hey there, I'm gonna post as Republican poster do:
So relevant, neocons bush/cheney and now McCain/Palin climate issue deniers get a hurricane to cancel their Convention first day....
Neocons and evangelicals against sex ed and sex before marriage see their VP Pick announce 17 y.o. daughter's off-wedlock pregnancy...
May I advise Bristol not listening to her mothers suggestions regarding babies strange-naming, I got two ideas for the newborn:
...whether it be a boy or a girl?
Gustav or Katrina?
Posted by: POV | September 1, 2008 4:44 PM | Report abuse
First: I am sick and tired of "values" left or right being such a public issue. Our values are decided by the courts, for good or for bad, and as good citizens we abide by the them.
We should be choosing the best person to be our elected official. It doesnt matter pro-life or choice! Please, we face wars and economic issues that affect all of us. Let these personal value matters be decided at home!!! Keep them there!! And out of the Office..that to both you Liberals and Conservative Freeks!
That said...i have to say Palin is going to be a disaster for McCain. She adds nothing except appearances. Being be Black or a woman is not why Obama and Hillary do well, its because they are strong intelligent fair-minded individuals. Palin has a lot to prove in a short time to stand along side these giants.
Posted by: Wake Up American | September 1, 2008 4:44 PM | Report abuse
first off if your going to attack something you have to have an understanding of it first. Christianity is not about being perfect. Christians are not perfect and we dont claim to be. We make mistakes just like everyone else but we try to learn from them. second it was her daughter not her, Gov. Palin must be a horrible person just like every other woman who works hard in this country who has children, according to the garbage im reading above? Third Obama has no executive experience.If Mccain Passes away while in office Palin would take over, well if Obama gets elected how old is he nobody is going to need to die to show how much experience obama has. And the abstinence issue Maybe Palins Daughter used a condom and it broke thats what happened to me when i was sixteen and i have an artistic and athletic son who gets good grades. He knows the repercusions of having premarital sex first hand even with a condom! What I do is every summer i take him to work with me everyday for about a month to remind him how hard he will have to work to put food in his children's mouth and to survive If he doesnt have a college education! This election should be about the war on terror and our economy not abstinence and as far as im concerned Mccain is the war canidate with all the experience and the war should come 1st. We all dont need a plane landing on our homes and businesses or a bomb going of in a mall or stadium! Please correct me if im wrong but what does obama bring to the table on that end. Talk is cheap he talks about change yes we can change our military posture but thats not going to stop the terrorist from plotting there next attack we tried appeasing the rest of the world and obviously that doesnt work.and last the economy Mccain has alot of experience being in Washington for a long time so he has the credentials and ask yourself what is causing the problem with the economy. HIGH GAS PRICES Palin is from Alaska and wants to tap into the large amount of fuel we have up there wouldnt that lower fuel costs. Who always votes against drilling in ANWAR Republicans or Greenpeace.
To sum this isssue up, the less money that you are spending on gas, groceries, and every thing else that has gone up since gas prices have risen, you would have more money to possibly put into educating your children (yourselves?) Isn't that part of the definiton of a parent? Possibly you could use that money to begin low cost seminars with other teens and parents alike. Therefore electing McCain/Palin the economy most probably will take a turn in the right direction!
Posted by: Ed J Naples Fl. | September 1, 2008 4:44 PM | Report abuse
Please, don't blame dems for going after this story. You need to place the blame exactly where it should lie, on the mother! Dems are not being mean to poor little Bristol, Her mother is the one who brought this upon her. No acceptance of the VP nomination and nobody knows who Bristol is. A 26 year old had sex with a 17 year old...and they have been dating for 3 years? I can only say that our possible VP is a very bad person for forcing this embarrassment upon her daughter.
I love my child much more than that and no matter what...my child and family come before anything else in this world. I am a very liberal person but my family values are in tact (surprise). Where are your family values at Mrs. Palin?
Posted by: Maxtrodamus | September 1, 2008 4:43 PM | Report abuse
PLEASE STOP!!
None of the personal lives of any of the candidates should really matter to anyone BUT them. This country is so SOAP OPERA oriented that there can't be any aspect of a famous person that isn't put under the microscope. We should be electing our President and his Vice as if this country were a multi-faceted company and we are HIRING a CEO!
I ask you, does it really matter to you or anyone in your company what the BOSS does in his personal life? Didn't think so... As long as the run the company in a legal and ethical way, the employees have what they need to thier jobs and are treated fairly- Do you really care about his life OUTSIDE of the office?
A person can be of so called "unmoral" character, but if they do thier job well and do not bring that to the office, most times you don't even know.
Shine that spotlight on your own family and see what jumps into the shadows, treat them the way you would want to be treated. It's an old lesson, but one everyone has seem to have forgotten.
We are ALLL HUMAN and therefore not one is perfect, so stop criticizing and look at the real issues at hand. This is not a soap opera, no one being elected is going to have a beer with you or stop to help you change your tire. They are elected to:RUN THE COUNTRY. End of story.
Posted by: Christie/Fort Wayne, IN | September 1, 2008 4:43 PM | Report abuse
Hmmmm, the men from "To catch a predator" only talked or thought about having sex with a minor and they ended up with lives ruined and in jail. This 23 year old man actually porked a 14 year old night after night and gets to marry her and have a governor as mommy-in-law. Where is the justice in this? Let the predators marry the 18 year old decoy, I SAY!
Posted by: Johnny b good | September 1, 2008 4:43 PM | Report abuse
A parent (fathers included) who would knowingly subject her teenager to this sort of scutiny for personal gain - family first, right?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:43 PM | Report abuse
By addressing access to quality moose meat for all Americans, McCain/Palin can divert this negative attention and address a pressing issue at the same time - a win win.
A bonus is if they could have Gustav first responders eating moose burgers by tomorrow. Triple play!
Posted by: Mooselover | September 1, 2008 4:42 PM | Report abuse
FLASH FLASH
THIS IS ALL MOOT ANYWAY BECAUSE GOP FOCUS GROUPS ARE SAYING TO GET RID OF HER. LOOK TO SEE HER GONE BEFORE THE END OF THE CONVENTION.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:42 PM | Report abuse
Are these crazy people from MOVEON.org???
Not an issue.
Independent Voter for McCain/Palin!
Posted by: VAVoter | September 1, 2008 4:41 PM | Report abuse
Sarah nor McCain, have made any claims to being perfect or the "Messiah". They are human being with human lives. Yes they have ideals, and beliefs, but that doesn't mean that they or anyone else for that mater can always live up to them. Life is filled with failures and successes, we often learn what is true and important by trying the wrong thing first. I believe in the ten commandments, it doesn't mean I have never broken them, nor does it mean that once broken that commandment is no longer true. The opposite any time I have broken a commandment I have come to understand why it is true and work even harder not to break it again in the future. The internet is filled with stone throwers, you all love to attack, flame and bomb others, I am sure plenty will do so to me for posting this. I feel sorry for those who have anger, and hate in their hearts, and who feel the need to try and tear others down. The irony of the left is they always say they care about the poor, women, those who are in difficult circumstances, but it doesn't seem to apply if those people are conservative. I am a bit shocked at how they are wanting to tear down this woman. If you don't like her positions on issue give a counter, but quit attacking the person for being human.
Posted by: NoStones | September 1, 2008 4:41 PM | Report abuse
I aint here to be your jesus Bill take up your own sins with the almighty. Carry your own cross you free loader.
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 4:40 PM | Report abuse
McCain's first "presidential" decision was to pick his running mate. He waited to the last minute on a decision that he had months to prepare for. In the end, he made an impulsive choice, a choice that was easily categorized as risky. Now it appears to have been a mistake for a variety of reasons including this present "soap opera" on the family values level. On a more basic level, Palin is not qualified to serve as the President of the United States. One sees the defensive posture being taken by Republicans on this VP candidate, but to a neutral observer, the Palin gambit was poorly thought out and is very likely to do damage to McCain.
Posted by: Tom Ditto | September 1, 2008 4:40 PM | Report abuse
"In addition, Alaska statutory rape laws declare that anyone who is 18 years old or older who has sex with a person who is 16 or 17, or who is at least three years younger than the offender, can be charged with sexual abuse in the third degree. This is also a felony."
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:40 PM | Report abuse
all ya all a bunch o fools....
She makes the case for a conservative position, no gay marriage, eliminate roe v wade, teach creationism but all of her moral positions lead to her daughter being a teen-mother - not the lesson I want my kids to learn thank you very much. How about personal responsibility for their actions, how about facing reality instead of letting an imaginary god solve the problem? I'm certain that god will look out for the Palins and prevent any bad stuff from happening like teenage pregnancy or say world war three! I for one dont want to see someone willing to stake her childs health on god making decisions that effect my life and family.
Posted by: crazy_world | September 1, 2008 4:40 PM | Report abuse
I'm curious where the name Trig came from. Downs syndrome is called Trisomy - is trig a reference to that? Seems insensative. Also, I am not sold that she had that child - despite their convenient excuse. The photo's and weird facts just don't support it.
Posted by: Tony | September 1, 2008 4:40 PM | Report abuse
The majority of you saddened me. Are we so shadow as to focus on Bristol instead of expending energy on discovering the voting record of Sarah Palin? Are we so shadow that sex is selling here rather than the philosophy of Sarah Palin? We have had number of Presidents with active libidos - Teddy Roosevelt had a children out of wedlock, FDR had his mistress, JFK had his "honey" & Clinton certainly wasn't an angel.
What message are you all sending to single moms and girls that find themselves pregnant...get rid of it!
Focus people...focus. This is a political race not a "who's in your bedroom" race!
Posted by: Saddened | September 1, 2008 4:40 PM | Report abuse
McCain is either senile or dumber than a bag of rocks...
"The Republicans have bragged that Palin opposed the famous "Bridge to Nowhere," only to learn that Palin supported the project and even told residents of Ketchikan that they weren't "nowhere" to her. After the national outcry, she decided to spend the funds allocated to the bridge for something else. Actually, maybe it's more fair to say that coincident with the national outcry, she changed her mind. The story shows her political judgment, but it is not a reformer's credential."
"Likewise, though she cut taxes as mayor of Wassila, she raised the sales tax, making her hardly a tax cutter."
"She denied pressuring the state's chief of public safety to fire her sister-in-law's husband even though there's mounting evidence that the impetus did indeed come from her. Ostensibly to clear her name, Palin asked her attorney general to open an independent investigation—the legislature had already been investigating. (I am told that the campaign was aware of the ethics complaint filed against her but accepts Palin's account.)"
"McCain's campaign seemed unaware that she supported a windfalls profits tax on oil companies and that she is more skeptical about human contributions to global warming than McCain is."
"They did not know that she took trips as the mayor of Wasilla to beg for earmarks."
"They did not know that she told a television interviewer this summer that she did not fully understand what it is that a vice president does."
Full story here:
Posted by: Audrey Beck | September 1, 2008 4:39 PM | Report abuse
Are you an Evangelical Christian?
You should read this, straight from Time Magazine--just printed!
"Sarah Palin is a longterm member of a group called Feminists for Life, which is not opposed to birth control."
Feminists for Life.
Not opposed to birth control.
It's rught there in Time Magazine.
Posted by: Marie Stewart | September 1, 2008 4:38 PM | Report abuse
The age of consent in Alaska is 16. Therefore no crime has been committed in the conceiving of this child.
Which is not to say that Christian conservatives are going to be hunky-dory with this news. John McCain would have been better off picking Ralph Nader as a running mate.
Posted by: Pragmatus | September 1, 2008 4:38 PM | Report abuse
McCain - Palin, travelin' full-speed-ahead down The Bridge to Nowhere...
http://www.bgladd.com/McSameStore/McSameBridgeToNowhere.jpg
A Harriet Meiers Moment draws nigh.
Posted by: BGladd | September 1, 2008 4:38 PM | Report abuse
This smells like the Daily Kos. There is a reason why we select 18 as the age of "adulthood". If your 17 year old child, regardless of the education and all the condoms and birth control pills you supply them still gets pregnant, doesn't necessarily mean you did or didn't do the right things. The moment and euphoria for someone of the early ages of puberty can be overwhelming - I mean Bill Clinton could not keep it in his pants even when he was an adult.
Where Palin and her daughter excels here, is they see the life created within Bristol as being more valuable than what most of you here consider worthless and a "punishment".
Bottom line, if you have sex (regardless of your age, knowledge or preventions taken) and get pregnant or get a girl pregnant, be responsible! Abortion is a cop out, plain and simple.
Posted by: JohnDoe the 3rd | September 1, 2008 4:38 PM | Report abuse
Christian Fundamentalists that want to impose their religion on others can't have it both ways:
Either, a pregnancy is a personal matter SEPARATE from government (as most Liberals argue), or it isn't.
Christian Fundamentalists want to impose non-medical/religious-only beliefs on people outside of their church in a nation where your pledge of allegiance means you swear not to do that. By advocating the imposition of spirituality into law Palin is forcing us to do something we shouldn't have to: to examine the consequences of Palin's religious beliefs on those of us who don't share those beliefs.
Christ was the first to advocate a separation of church and state when he declared "Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s" (Matthew 22:21, see also John 18:36). Not even someone who Christian Fundamentalists believe is fit to run the country, who embodies their "Christian Values", is able to keep her adolescent daughter abstinent. If you don't want people to look at how well abstinence worked out for your daughter, do us all a favor, mind your own business and remember your oath to uphold the Constitution means real American patriots would sooner die than allow their or anyone else's religious beliefs to be forced onto others.
Posted by: Edwin | September 1, 2008 4:38 PM | Report abuse
"This is probably a ploy to get Women and Womyn to FEEL SORRY for the daughter who was BY DEFINITION..a VICTIM.
Posted by: HILARIOUS | September 1, 2008 1:54 PM "
HAHAHAH omg that's funny because I'm a woman and I don't feel sorry for her. Way to generalize. What is she a victim of? Maybe a crappy sex education program?
"Liberals saying a woman should stay home and take care of the children. Will wonders never cease!"
"Liberals"... (thanks for lumping everybody together... would you like me to throw you in the same box as Bill O'Reilly and Ann Coulter... WHY ARE CONSERVATIVES CRAZY WHACKJOB, SEXIST, RACIST JERKS?)
"Liberals" are only saying that because to point out what a hypocrite she is. Palin herself has stated that she is "pro-family" and believes in the traditional roles of the family, having a father and a mother blahdy blahdy blah blah. The other "liberals" are stupid and don't realize the double standard of their criticisms. They probably would never have said anything if she was a man. "HOW COME MR. PALIN ACCEPTED HIS VP NOMINATION WHEN HE HAS 5 KIDS TO TAKE CARE OF!" Nope, never would have happened.
Posted by: J | September 1, 2008 4:37 PM | Report abuse
Bristol clearly had MORNING SICKNESS, not mono. Having had it with both pregnancies, I know it would be hard to cover up as a high school student. This poor girl, paraded in front of the nation. What kind of mother would put her pregnant daughter in such an embaressing situation? I have two daughters, and would never put my own ambitions before there needs. Sheesh.
Posted by: S. Papp | September 1, 2008 4:37 PM | Report abuse
As a Christian I have a set of moral goals that I try to reach and often come short of. I am blessed that thought the gace of God that I am forgiven though Christ Jesus. The Palin familey is not the Cleevers from the 50's they face the same trials as us all. I am proud of the way they are handleing it. I don't agree it is good to be pregnant and unwed but I do not have the right to judge.
Posted by: shane arnett | September 1, 2008 4:37 PM | Report abuse
The story of Palin's daughter matters in the same way that Eliot Spitzer's affair matters. The issue is hypocrisy. Here is the unknown candidate chosen over Romney, who clearly has the credentials to be President but was rejected largely because Evangelicals see Mormons as heretics, solely to appease the Bible Belt. Consider this. Chelsea Clinton has never been pregnant and Obama did not ditch his first wife for a rich socialite. What else about Family Values do we need to learn from the GOP?
Posted by: Dan | September 1, 2008 4:37 PM | Report abuse
Palin a real hockey mom??? I highly doubt it. Real hockey and soccer moms are with their children and guiding them to make right decisions. Not letting a teenager date an adult and get pregnant!! I am a die hard hillary fan and Palin is so far from Hillary so I would never vote for mccain. Mccain had a better chance picking Mrs Bailey from Texas that is 5x more qualified. Palin can't pertray herself like you or me or an every day hockey mom because I am not raising a teenage daughter that is pregnant by a man almost 10 yrs older than her. Palin is nothing like us.
Posted by: Shonda | September 1, 2008 4:36 PM | Report abuse
I am glad you love her but as we speak in Minneapolis the GOP are running focus groups and she is running at a 2 to 1 negative.
The only reason they would even be doing this is because they are going to dump her as fast as they can.
----------
This whole story, in addition to being an outrageous intrusion into the private life of the Palin family, only reinforces the image of the Palins as a regular, down-to-earth working class family that has to deal with issues that many blue-collar families experience at some point of their lives. In other words, Obama's worst nightmare.
Furthermore, Bristol's story also shows that the Palin women have now chosen not only once, but twice to keep their babies in adverse circumstances where other women would have otherwise opted for an abortion. That makes them heroes in the eyes of the pro-life crowd.
The end result of the Palin baby story is that it will hurt Obama more than it hurts McCain. In fact, if the loony Obama cult followers continue to attack the Palin family on such a personal level, digging up their private life, Obama might even sink in the polls.
Posted by: Mbruno | September 1, 2008 4:32 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:36 PM | Report abuse
Wow. Chum in the water. For what it's worth, here's a website totally unrelated to politics with a story dated back in April about a random run-in with Palin in an airport. Apparently she was visiblly pregnant then. http://www.polartrec.com/node/3944
Maybe the slime over at KOS threw the speculation over who the mom is out there to force the issue on Palin's daughter's pregnancy. Who knows... Talk about throwing all the cards up in the air for the election outcome. The polsters must be salivating over raking in all the dough to figure out what all this means.
What a sick time we live in.
Ought to be a wild week.
Posted by: sophia g | September 1, 2008 4:35 PM | Report abuse
Help me, I'm confused. The conservative right rails with moral outrage at the news that Jamie Lynn Spears is pregnant, yet rushes to call Bristol Palin's teen pregnancy (fathered by a man almost twice her age, no less) a blessing and defend her mother's so-called family values and parenting skills. Oh, that's right. Hypocrisy.
Posted by: Jeffrey Majeau | September 1, 2008 4:35 PM | Report abuse
I'm sorry but I think that a mother has a obligation to her children before anthing else. If she can't keep her own children in line how could she keep a country in line?
Posted by: Lori | September 1, 2008 4:35 PM | Report abuse
LETS BE FAIR! YOU CAN"T BLAME THE BLACK MAN FOR THIS ONE.LOL!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:34 PM | Report abuse
I'm out of here. Even the best of families have unwed mothers, especially these days. That doesn't make it right, but the posters here have no right to judge. Judgement will be done elsewhere. Or maybe you can get Johna, the warped pastor to judge again. Straighten up your own lives before you work on someone else.
Namaste'
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 4:34 PM | Report abuse
So who is really going to be VP when Palin pulls out this week in order to be with her family 'because of the vicious left wing media attacks on her family'.
I feel bad for the daughter. And really worried about McCain's judgement!
Posted by: Bob | September 1, 2008 4:34 PM | Report abuse
Poor McCain, he was simply faced with a Dobson's Choice.
Posted by: BGladd | September 1, 2008 4:34 PM | Report abuse
"Sarah Palin is a longterm member of a group called Feminists for Life, which is not opposed to birth control."
Straight from Time Magazine.
Did you hear that, Social Conservatives?
Feminists for Life.
Not opposed to birth control.
I just read it in Time Magazine.
Reading. It's fundamental.
Posted by: Marie Stewart | September 1, 2008 4:34 PM | Report abuse
I believe not only is her daughter pregnant but that this is bb No. 2. I've read and seen picts in the internet and they are right, there doesn't seem to be a single picture of S. Palin pregnant + she claims she took a plane and travelled to Alaska with her water broken, yeah right!
On the other hand, there is a pict of B. Palin with what looks like a preggo belly.
There is only one reason to try and hide that Trig is Bristol's baby: That she is expecting a second child!!!!!!!!!
Otherwise, wouldn't it be easier just to acknowledge that Bristol is Trig's mom but that grandma kept the baby so the baby could have more chances in life?
No one would dare to mess with them if that was the case... unless this is Bristol's second child which would prove granny's abstinence policies are really stoopid!
Posted by: athena | September 1, 2008 4:33 PM | Report abuse
P.S. The younger daughter is hotter. Hopefully she will follow in big sis' footsteps. Can anyone say White house SitCom on FOX.
Work with me here: a wacky family moves into the White House and gets into all kinds of hijinx. Grandpa McCain keeps yelling at the kids to stay off the West Lawn. The weddings, wow, this is ratings gold. I wonder if the guy who played Benson is available as the butler.
Oh yeah, this is all Obama's fault
Posted by: Mike L. | September 1, 2008 4:33 PM | Report abuse
She called herself a hockey mom but has no problem leaving her new born infant with special needs and a soon to be grandchild for a possible job that will make caring for them someone elses responsibility. I'm not against mothers working but don't try to paint a rosey picture where there is none. Raising a child with special needs and a child with a child is not something to take lightly. To say I can do this and also be VP of the United States of America is ignorant. You can't have it all in this case. For people to say that keeping the soon to be grandchild shows her family values I say turning down the offer to run for VP to care for her family going through a tough time now would be true evidence that she values family. If she's really as good as John McCaine says she is, there will be other offers in the future. Hopefully for the kids' sake, Mr. Palin is a hockey dad.
Posted by: Wes | September 1, 2008 4:33 PM | Report abuse
Gloucester High "pregnancy pact" got blanket coverage from cable news. Cable news has allocated all resources to weakly Gustav and refuses to run a photo of Sarah Palin while reading her statement on her daughter. In contrast, cable news repeatedly ran photos of John Edwards while reading a dubious pregnancy story. Palin is a 527 Ted Stevens protege and all the bad news is being slipped out under the overcoverage of an underpowered storm.
Posted by: storm of the century | September 1, 2008 4:33 PM | Report abuse
Here is the one point that has not been made by the press.
One child is four months old with Down Syndrome and a second child is 17 years old unwed and pregnant. Todd and Sarah Palin decided to still be a part of a national campaign with two children who clearly need all their love and attention now. Am I the only one is bothered by their decision? Could you imagine what it must be like to be Bristol and have this news televised to the world?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:33 PM | Report abuse
WW Terry the Latins are a bunch of communists! McCain/Palin 08
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 4:33 PM | Report abuse
Everything about this is astounding, including Barbie...oh, sorry...Cindy saying that the vice president in waiting has a great mind.
So, we have a 5000 year old planet, sadly god blesses us with children with genetic defects, abstinence is the way, polar bears are over-abundant, drilling is the answer to high oil prices, evolution is on equal footing with religious mythology...Please!!
Another country would be filing for reorganization, but we go on seeing this circus written about as serious. It is not. It is a foolish charade and the emperor not only has no clothes, he has no real critics in the journalism biz.
Posted by: Richard McDonough | September 1, 2008 4:32 PM | Report abuse
I still want to see hard proof that Trig (Gee, Mom, thanks for the great name) Palin is her son. She definitely did not look pregnant back in Feb/March when she announced.
This all reminds me of that scene in 'Tootsie' Where Dustin Hoffman takes off his wig, Bill Murray at home watching on TV: "That is one weird show!"
Posted by: Germanicus | September 1, 2008 4:32 PM | Report abuse
This whole story, in addition to being an outrageous intrusion into the private life of the Palin family, only reinforces the image of the Palins as a regular, down-to-earth working class family that has to deal with issues that many blue-collar families experience at some point of their lives. In other words, Obama's worst nightmare.
Furthermore, Bristol's story also shows that the Palin women have now chosen not only once, but twice to keep their babies in adverse circumstances where other women would have otherwise opted for an abortion. That makes them heroes in the eyes of the pro-life crowd.
The end result of the Palin baby story is that it will hurt Obama more than it hurts McCain. In fact, if the loony Obama cult followers continue to attack the Palin family on such a personal level, digging up their private life, Obama might even sink in the polls.
Posted by: Mbruno | September 1, 2008 4:32 PM | Report abuse
Only the Eagle Ch’áak’ family can make Sarah's kids and Family laugh!
Evolution of Dance
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMH0bHeiRNg
Igu.aa yax x’wán
Ch’áak’ naax xat sitee
Obama/Biden Rock!
Posted by: Eagle Ch’áak’s Daughter | September 1, 2008 4:32 PM | Report abuse
Look people, this issue, as other attack issues, is nothing more than a side note. This country is going down the tubes quickly because people are concerned with stupid, yes I said stupid issues. People who cast their vote based on gun control are redneck idiots. People who base their vote on anti-abortion issues are religious idiots. Lets make sure we save all the poor babies from death and make sure everybody can have their shotgun in the gun rack in their pick em up truck.
These are great things to possess as a country right? Even if they lead to the demise of the country? If the economy is not repaired we will cease to exist at some point as a nation or be relegated to a powerless and impotent excuse for a country.
What is happening in Iraq is plain and simple murder, torture, and theft. Lets get back to the real issues that can help our once great nation become the leader of the free world again. Our nation and our leader are the laughing stock of the world right now. That is not to say we have the worst government on earth but it is to say we had everything and let a disgusting, lying, war criminal take it away...steal it if you will.
Posted by: Maxtrodamus | September 1, 2008 4:32 PM | Report abuse
Mary in CT -
The baby was born prematurely - she wasn't expecting to go into labor a month early.
Posted by: va2dc | September 1, 2008 4:31 PM | Report abuse
Makes you wonder what kind of manager Sarah is.
Posted by: Carl | September 1, 2008 4:31 PM | Report abuse
She is The Deadliest Catch:
Posted by: BGladd | September 1, 2008 4:31 PM | Report abuse
CLEO
I did not criticize the mother for not staying home - BUT if you take the option of having FIVE children - SOMEONE needs to stay home. I am also surprised that you didn't mention the BUSH GIRLS in your history lesson. They have been an embarrassment to the US. Wouldn't it be nice for a change to have the Obama girls instead of the past 30 years or so.
Posted by: obamacan1 | September 1, 2008 4:31 PM | Report abuse
When they say that Sarah Palin is 44, Mother of 5, should they mention grandmother as well?
Posted by: I'm nalin palin.com | September 1, 2008 4:31 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "Bill that retarded new born is actually Willow's baby."
Again Johna, a little proof is required. You are some pastor. Worse than Obama's pastor by a long shot.
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 4:30 PM | Report abuse
A few points:
1. Creating "what if" situations and telling people what their opinions would be is not reasoned debate.
2. Bristol Palin is not running for office. Neither is Obama's dead mother.
3. A Hilary backer who now backs Palin does not care about fundamental differences in policy. Really, they have one thing in common.
4. Experience matters. So does judgement, education, intelligence and leadership. We should weigh all of these things. So should executives when hiring.
5. Abstinence works if one actually abstains.
6. Foreign policy is not determined by state governments, no matter how close they are to borders.
7. "Hope" and "Change" are morally neutral concepts.
8. The U.S. Government and the Alaska Government are at least a couple of magnitudes apart. Like high school football and the NFL. Different quality of players.
Posted by: feralboy12 | September 1, 2008 4:30 PM | Report abuse
FROM:
http://blog.laborlawtalk.com/2006/10/18/alaska-statutory-rape-laws/
read the second to last paragraph:
Statutory rape is defined as sexual activity – without the use of force or violence – with anyone defined as a minor. The thought behind these laws is that a minor is unable to legally consent to sexual activity. Statutory rape is so common in the United States that the federal government’s Department of Health and Human Services commissioned a report on this type of crime in 2004.
State laws vary slightly in terms of defining the term “minor” and in the criminal and financial penalties that can be applied to statutory rape cases. At this time I’d like to discuss Alaska statutory rape laws with you for a few minutes.
The age of consent is defined as 16 years old, according to Alaska statutory rape laws. If a person who is at least 18 years old engages in sexual activity with a person who is 16 years old or younger, he or she will be charged with sexual abuse of a minor in the first degree. This charge is a felony in Alaska. And remember, it does not matter if you did not force or threaten the other person into performing this sexual act with you. It is still a crime under Alaska statutory rape laws.
Any person who is 16 years old or older who has sexual intercourse with a minor who is 13-, 14-, or 15-years-old will be charged with sexual abuse of a minor in the second degree. Again, this charge is also a felony.
You can also be charged with a felony – sexual abuse in the third degree – if you are at least 16 years old and you have sex with anyone who is age 13-15, or if the person is a minor at least three years younger than you. In addition, Alaska statutory rape laws declare that anyone who is 18 years old or older who has sex with a person who is 16 or 17, or who is at least three years younger than the offender, can be charged with sexual abuse in the third degree. This is also a felony.
Alaska statutory rape laws carry punishments that include imprisonment and fines.
Posted by: Kathy | September 1, 2008 4:30 PM | Report abuse
Lol the funny thing is the liberals have been screaming the most about having a "regular type of american" who "knows the everyday difficulties of life" and yet when someone who at least somewhat closely resembles a normal person actually is nominated you tear them apart because they are not a democrat.
Face it; liberals are more concerned with how things appear and look rather than how they function. Face it you apparently want a rich, fake politician who gives a good speech but doesn't accomplish anything. You'll hop on the latest eco trends and use that as an excuse for being excessive consumers in other respects. It's sad when a majority of the wing of a political party has been reduced to have a group of lawyers make everyone give something so that you don't have to do or give anything on your own.
I'm exaggerating since a good portion of people are moderates but as a moderate I love the hypocrisy on both extremist wings.
Posted by: Cryos | September 1, 2008 4:30 PM | Report abuse
It's very simple. Just have a blood/DNA test performed on little Trig to confirm who the mom and dad are. Why is everyone making this so complicated?
Posted by: JaxDiamond | September 1, 2008 4:30 PM | Report abuse
In my sate, the great state of Utah, us 58 year old men typically date women under the age of consent. I made my wife marry me when she turned the age of twelve and we have been happily married for the past three years.
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 4:30 PM | Report abuse
"Let those without sin cast the first stone!" I thought so, no takers. We all make mistakes, and even Presidents get caught with their pants down. Isn't that right Mr. Clinton!
Posted by: Joe306tow | September 1, 2008 4:29 PM | Report abuse
Welcome to the 21st century u stuck up people get over it, its not ur issue and definitelly has nothing to do who is gonna be better prez, Obama or McCain. In two days everybody will forget about it as it should not have been a national news anyway.
Look for real issues, not this stuff, no wonder this country is going downhill from within cuz we whine and care about things that do not really matter.
Posted by: 36mafia | September 1, 2008 4:29 PM | Report abuse
Cirly,
I would not have an abortion, so I would not suggest that someone would. I'm a single mom - yes, I made a mistake - my daughter was not a mistake. I made the personal decision to be the best mom I could. I gave up many things to raise my daughter and give her the time and energy and resources she would need to become an independent, responsibleb woman. She is currently in college on a full scholarship. She's multi talented and is adamant about honesty. And she catches herself saying, I'm starting to sound like my mom (as she grins.) What more could a mother want.
We make a commintment to our children, to our families. It's not liberal or conservative - it's loving.
My whole point was that Palin has too much going on to commit to her family and our nation at this time - when both are needy. She is too inexperienced. That is my opinion, which I am entitled to.
And Palin would like to tell me how I should run my life? I don't think so.
And McCain made the poor choice of picking her as his running mate = poor judgement.
Our country is in trouble. We need good, sound leadership sans the drama.
Posted by: Tough2Name | September 1, 2008 4:29 PM | Report abuse
Tamara Lillie -
Why are you saying Obama will cut Defense? Where are you getting your information, FOX News? He has supported our soldiers and will continue to do so and will increase out military as well. McCain is the one who continually votes against our wonderful men in uniform. Please get informed before you vote or you and your son will regret it.
Posted by: sweladi | September 1, 2008 4:29 PM | Report abuse
Lefties stirring things up? At what point are some of us righties allowed to question this? Does ability to parent count on a VP resume?
Posted by: Paul | September 1, 2008 4:29 PM | Report abuse
I personally support unprotected premarital teen sex, and would like to know how I could get involved. I would appreciate it if the GOP could introduce me to some of these lovely young ladies.
Posted by: dr | September 1, 2008 2:56 PM
Here you go! http://thebruceblog.wordpress.com/2008/08/30/sarah-palin-sisterhood-of-the-traveling-catsuit/
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:29 PM | Report abuse
Maybe if Sarah Palin was focusing on being a mother, then her daughter would not be so loose.
Posted by: Robert | September 1, 2008 4:29 PM | Report abuse
Well, I guess Democrats are too classy to stoop to the level of the "Republican attack machine" or the "right-wing conspiracy." Democrats would never bring a candidate's family into campaign fodder, oh no certainly not (unless its a Republican). Obama is tired of the "politics of personal destruction" and wants it to stop (unless its a Republican). Sheesh, Democrats are such hypocrites. And the news media - their professional standards won't allow them to print drivel about a candidate's personal life (unless its a Rebublican).
Posted by: Dave | September 1, 2008 4:29 PM | Report abuse
What is the big deal? Obama's own mother was a teenage mother. It sounds like this wasn't secret at all. You can't possibly suggest that McCain didn't know. He rightly decided that it doesn't reflect on how she can do her job.
In Wasilla, Pregnancy Was No Secret:
"All weekend they had the decency not to pretend that they didn't know the governor's eldest daughter was pregnant. But they also expected decency in return, that I wouldn't be the kind of person to make sport out of a young girl's slip.
The fact is, regardless of what you will hear over the next few days, Bristol's pregnancy is not a legitimate political issue."
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1837862-2,00.html
Time to move on moveon.org bloggers. You are only hurting your candidate by attacking a teenager.
Posted by: tss | September 1, 2008 4:28 PM | Report abuse
The Dems are in no position to criticize Sarah Palin's family. When Obama was 17, he was snorting coke and drinking himself into oblivion. Biden is a liar and a plagiarist. And as for Obama's statement that his surrogates had nothing to do with the internet rumors re: baby Trig -- if you believe that, then I guess I could sell you the Brooklyn Bridge.
Posted by: Jim | September 1, 2008 4:28 PM | Report abuse
Baby Trig IS BRISTOL'S BABY!!! Research this! Sarah is a liar. Do you fools want her running this country? You'll see that Bristol does not have another baby, because she's already HAD him!
Posted by: Zoe Lawrence | September 1, 2008 4:28 PM | Report abuse
The father is 26? It might be time to lock somebody up right? Just what's the legal age in Alaska? This was not the case of two teens having sex. It's a classic case of a cradle robbing, no game having grown man abusing the mind of a teen.
Where I come from he would be called a pimp and she would be considered getting ripened up for hooking!
Posted by: HuhWhat | September 1, 2008 4:28 PM | Report abuse
Just think about it like this, if it were Obama's daughter that got knocked up we'd never know. That girl would be off to an abortion mill before the piss dried on the Clear Blue Easy stick. Remember Obama's motto for abortion, "If at first you don't succeed, put the baby in the trash."
Posted by: DarthT | September 1, 2008 4:28 PM | Report abuse
Why is it that there are so many "white trash" comments being thrown around about Sarah Palin, but damned if anyone can say anything about the color of Obama's skin?! It must be because there's not a single black person out there that has had a baby out of wedlock, right?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:28 PM | Report abuse
I see no report (or I missed it) of the age of the father. What was the true age of Bristol Palin at the time of conception? Is this statutory rape? Is statutory rape considered a pass through by the Republican anti-abortion folks? If this is statutory rape, how come it is not being prosecuted?
Posted by: JIm Bell | September 1, 2008 4:28 PM | Report abuse
A rather important point that the media has thus far missed--plus a new exciting option!:
It is impossible that the McCain vetting team knew about this in advance.
a) McCain originally wanted to choose Lieberman, Pawlenty or Ridge. He was forced to reject these choices because the *evangelical* faction would not accept someone who did not meet their criteria for their set of values.
b) Do you therefore mean to say that, in attempting to select someone who would satisfy these values voters, the McCain team would *knowingly* select someone who has a teenage daughter who is illegitimately pregnant? Utterly contradictory and, if known, would have defeated the purpose of the choice.
c) Therefore, we also now have the issue of the McCain camp covering up its incomplete vetting by stating that they knew what they obviously did not know in the first place.
d) New exciting option! Or--the McCain team *knew* that the 16 year old daughter of his choice for VP was illegimately pregnant--as they are now saying (so it must be true) but did not reveal it--until it threatened to reveal itself.
It's fascinating what people will do when faced with fact.
I love the smell of ad hominem in the afternoon. Smells exactly like panic.
Posted by: Marie Stewart | September 1, 2008 4:27 PM | Report abuse
Such hate mail from little people. Always remember the Latin word for left: it is sinister. You see the Roman's had it right about the left 2000 years ago. So hate on, get indigestion, have a heart attack and drop dead. McCain and Palin in 2008. Thank God for Sarah Palin.
Posted by: WW Terry | September 1, 2008 4:27 PM | Report abuse
another welfare recipient.the birth of welfare.like mother like daughter.keep the kids comming kids.any body out there ready to give her a home or set up a college fund for the kid.oh man this is a great story.what could be better than this.maybe her son being shot in iraq.great stories are there any book deals coming yet.and by the way hows the father does he need a job.no need we'll get america to pitch in and help them out.so please send all donations to the white house lawn
Posted by: frank | September 1, 2008 4:27 PM | Report abuse
If the father of the baby were another teen then I really wouldn't care about this.
However, if it's true that the father's in his mid-20's & they've been dating for 3 years then there's a problem. What's the age of consent in Alaska? Will the father be charged with statutory???
I SERIOUSLY question the judgement of a parent who would let their early teen daughter start dating a man in his 20's. (Of course I also seriously question the judgement of someone who drags their medically-fragile baby out on the campaign trail.)
Posted by: madtal | September 1, 2008 4:27 PM | Report abuse
Is unmarried pregnancy is crime? Yes, if you are an evangelical Christian. But Sarah Palin's daughter cannot even repent her sins in private. Her mother's political ambitions, and those of McCain, demand that her shame be paraded on television and all the media. What better example of evangelical hypocrisy and evil? As Jesus said: woe ye scribes and pharisees.
Posted by: norman ravitch | September 1, 2008 4:27 PM | Report abuse
hyp·o·crite
1. a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that she does not actually possess, esp. a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.
2. a person who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, esp. one whose private life, opinions, or statements belie his or her public statements.
Need I say more to explain the Republican Party...
Posted by: Jimmy Green | September 1, 2008 4:26 PM | Report abuse
Sarah Palin and her family have my deepest respect and sympathies. No doubt she is a fine woman and a terrific govenor for Alaska. The think that troubles me most is how McCain arrived at his choice. He only met her once before making up his mind to partner with her. If this is the way he makes decisions, I fear for this country if he is elected. If I lived in Alaska I would be a staunch Palin supporter in her run for govenor. As a VP, a heartbeat away from the presidency, this gives me a cold sweat. God help this country if the electorate falls for this reckless and incompetent decision process, just to elect a pro-life candidate.
Posted by: Robin from Colorado | September 1, 2008 4:26 PM | Report abuse
John McCain's first Presidential decision!
Posted by: avoter | September 1, 2008 4:26 PM | Report abuse
Just as Picture Shows...
Bristol - the Mother - Is Person feeding and taking Care of Baby?
Posted by: Realista | September 1, 2008 4:26 PM | Report abuse
Wow. I can't believe some of the nonsense I'm reading.
I live and teach in a small town, and teen pregnancy happens. I would NEVER even think of blaming the parents of a teenage girl for this type of mistake.
It sounds like her daughter and the father are trying to do the right thing. It's going to be a tough ride, but now they've got to deal with the consequences of their decision to have pre-marital sex. I wish them luck.
Posted by: stickety | September 1, 2008 4:26 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "With this news of Palin's daughter having sex with all these men in Alaska we must ask ourselves before voting for McCain/Palin if we really need anymore postitutes in Washington."
Johna, you just said that you were a pastor. I'm sure glad that I don't attend your church. That's just sick. "She has been having sex with all those men" according to you. Your proof please.
Some pastor!!
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 4:25 PM | Report abuse
It does not take a genius to see that McCain selected this woman to appease the right corner of his party for better or for worse.At the moment,it seems to be tending towards the latter.McCain has shown poor judgement in selecting her and gov. Palin has shown the same in accepting this dance. At least he can say to the Krystol,Limbaugh Bucannon wing that he has tried.
The left wing conspiracy? Ask John Edwards about that.
This kind of stuff sells.(unfortunately)
Posted by: harryk | September 1, 2008 4:25 PM | Report abuse
I have to say, I never quite understood Palin's decision to get on a plane for Alaska after going into labor. What was she doing so far from home in the first place? It is also common knowledge that the more babies one has, the faster they come once you go into labor. She would rather risk having the baby on the plane or on the way to the airport rather than in a hospital -- especially given the child's known disability? This makes no sense.
Before you tell me to mind my own business -- this is part of her "narrative," so we have a right to chew it before we swallow it!
Posted by: Mary in CT | September 1, 2008 4:25 PM | Report abuse
Noemie Emery wrote,[This pick of Sarah Palin] “Wipes out the image of McCain as the crotchety elder and brings back that of the fly-boy and gambler, which is much more appealing, and the genuine person.”
_____________________________
A 72 year-old "fly-boy and gambler" President who chooses his "soulmate" for VP after 8 years of a 60-year-old
fly-boy and gambler is not appealing, it's horrifying! This is not fraternity row! Enough of these tropes!!! Let's all repeat the Hillary mantra: No Way, No How, NO MCCAIN!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:25 PM | Report abuse
Sarah Palin's botched cover up is the most cynical thing I've observed in politics in a long time.
Is there anything people can believe in anymore? This is as bad as if hypothetically, Michael Phelps popped positive for doping.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:25 PM | Report abuse
I am sure That she didn't set out to get pregnant. Bad judgement, But Wait, America was in AHHHHHHHHH when Jammie Spears got pregnant. We hoop LA! When The Gov of N.J got caught having an affair with another man. We said so what , Thats his buiesness. Lets focus on what Gov Palin has done for Alaska, She is the one that got all the residents a refund check for the oil revenue... That continues anually to this day. Thats who I want in office. We forgive evryone else in Govt and beyond, We can do the same here. The republician party will do Just Fine.
Posted by: Linda | September 1, 2008 4:25 PM | Report abuse
She's the VP pick?? She's got no experience. Clearly McCain chose her knowing these family issues came with her. And sadly it's an attempt to recruit the white blue collar vote. Maybe they can relate to 17 year olds getting married and popping out babies left and right in Jesus's name. Is this pick about McCain finding a qualified candidate that would become president or finding a WAY to become president?
She's a terrible mother with poor decision making. IF Trig is Sarah's - who in their right mind gets on a plane after their water breaks. Especially when it's a baby with downs? Great executive decision making there! Can't wait until she makes decisions affecting my life. Additionally, what kind of mother would accept the VP nomination knowing full well her 17 year old daughter would be thrown to the press wolves because of their conservative family values? Are you kidding me???
The worst part is the republicans are backing McCain's pick. Dumb, dumb, dumb!
Posted by: McCain_is_a_sellout | September 1, 2008 4:25 PM | Report abuse
another corrupt,lying fraud ,brought to you by the Rove-influenced GOP...I say the media needs to look her over with a lice comb if she,indeed,lied...you wait,though,they will accuse the liberals of making it all up,why,gosh!
I deliver babies. what she claims is close to impossible,leading me to believe she is a lying scumbag like the others.
Posted by: waggs | September 1, 2008 4:25 PM | Report abuse
Stupid #1: Graduated 894 out of 899 from the Naval Academy. He even got into the academy because of daddy's and grandpa's help. Crashed 5 jet fighters 'cause he didn't know how to control them. There are even speculations that he lost control of his plane (again!) and crashed into Vietnam (history tells that he was shutdown by the enemy). Gold digger, YES, he loves money and dumb blonds. He even cheated on his 1st wife, but according to Hannity, it's ok because McBush is a "War Hero".
Stupid #2 (aka white trash): No experience and can't control even her own family.
Posted by: Common Sense | September 1, 2008 4:24 PM | Report abuse
Britney Spears AND Paris Hilton were seriously considered and were on McCain's VP short list
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:24 PM | Report abuse
Look Folks, Palin was/is McCain's big bold VP choice. And the RNC rolled her out to the world toting her as the hockey mom with 5 kids the last of which is a 5-month old DS baby. That was the prepped narrative on the woman. As a mother and a professional woman myself, I took umbrage with that presentation because Palin actually has some accomplishments in the little time she has been governor. Somehow what she has accomplished has been completely obscured by her personal family life and details. Her own party decided that we would love her story and not her politics. The RNC rather gave us a face in place of BOLD NEW ideas. The aftermath of all of this bull is of the Repubs own making. Let em lay in their beds, thank you very much.
What this selection does show me is how rash McCain is in his decision making. They give us this as a solution to our very real problems: economy, education, healthcare, energy, and oh, yea war...What about those issues, huh? McCain single handedly gave me my reason to not vote for him. I do not appreciate this circus when our country is faced with greater issues to solve. This is past ridiculous...
Either accept Palin and her personal family problems or put another one on the ticket and move on. Enough Already
Posted by: TexLibertarian | September 1, 2008 4:24 PM | Report abuse
Palin will be a Harriet Meirs situation. She will decide to withdraw. She is obviously unqualified and only the most loyal Repubulicans will defend this choice. Republicans have many leaders who are prepared through education, experience and contacts to serve as an excellent VP candidate.
I am a strong democrat, supported Senator Clinton. These two women have nothing in common except being outspoken, smart. willing to lead. Otherwise, Palin is not in the same league with Clinton.
The people who will judge the girls pregancy are Republican types - always judging, moralizingl. It is liberals who will be accepting of this unwed teen pregnacy. The girl is beautiful. I am glad her boyfriend is willing to get married and give a family/marriage a try.
For those who insist that the downs syndrome baby is the girls, I say that is very unlikely. Teens rarely give birth to downs syndrome babies. Women over 35 and especially in 40s have a much higher risk of this genetic difference in a fetus, so much so that as a woman gets older she is counseled about this risk with a pregnancy. The older a woman is after 35, the higher the risk.
I am very supportive of wommen working and raising their children. However, choices have to be made to balance mothering responsibilities with work load. As children get older it becomes a little easier. It is hard to imagine that most women would chose to take an extremely demanding job, much less running for VP in the national elecion, with an infant at home. Young children need bonding time with their moms and no one else will do. As liberal and supportive of wommen's rights as I thought I was, I would draws the line on Palin's choice to accept the VP nomination given that she has a baby and 3 other children at home. If they were older then that would be different.
I do not judge Palin about her beautiful daughter's pregnacy. Teens are all hormones and if they think they are in love it is hard to obstain from sex. My impression is that a lot of those that do abstain do so because they haven't found a boyfriend or girlfriend. Correct or not, that is my impression.
No matter all of the hullabaloo about Palin's family - She is clearly not ready to be VP, much less a VP for an old man who will, based on health stats probablilities, have serious health/.mental decline during his first time. If McCain has a stroke or heart attack, can you imagine Palin as instantly our president? No way. And even if he makes it ok, can you imagine her being president of the Senate (one of the VPs jobs) and would the Senators even accept her in that role. NO NO NO.
No way, No how, No McCain/Palin
Palin needs to withdraw so someone else can be selected and people still at least have an option to chose a Republican president/vice president. I wouldn't trust anything some of these Republicans are saying to support this selection. They want McCain to win and have no choice right now but to support her. That doesn't mean they really do, are just supporting the party line.
I have only the best wishes for the Palin family and do respect the achievements she seems to have accomplished. Still I can imagine what a disaster this will be if by some long shot the McCain/Palin ticket does actually win in the election.
Posted by: Susan | September 1, 2008 4:24 PM | Report abuse
Palin will be a Harriet Meirs situation. She will decide to withdraw. She is obviously unqualified and only the most loyal Repubulicans will defend this choice. Republicans have many leaders who are prepared through education, experience and contacts to serve as an excellent VP candidate.
I am a strong democrat, supported Senator Clinton. These two women have nothing in common except being outspoken, smart. willing to lead. Otherwise, Palin is not in the same league with Clinton.
The people who will judge the girls pregancy are Republican types - always judging, moralizingl. It is liberals who will be accepting of this unwed teen pregnacy. The girl is beautiful. I am glad her boyfriend is willing to get married and give a family/marriage a try.
For those who insist that the downs syndrome baby is the girls, I say that is very unlikely. Teens rarely give birth to downs syndrome babies. Women over 35 and especially in 40s have a much higher risk of this genetic difference in a fetus, so much so that as a woman gets older she is counseled about this risk with a pregnancy. The older a woman is after 35, the higher the risk.
I am very supportive of wommen working and raising their children. However, choices have to be made to balance mothering responsibilities with work load. As children get older it becomes a little easier. It is hard to imagine that most women would chose to take an extremely demanding job, much less running for VP in the national elecion, with an infant at home. Young children need bonding time with their moms and no one else will do. As liberal and supportive of wommen's rights as I thought I was, I would draws the line on Palin's choice to accept the VP nomination given that she has a baby and 3 other children at home. If they were older then that would be different.
I do not judge Palin about her beautiful daughter's pregnacy. Teens are all hormones and if they think they are in love it is hard to obstain from sex. My impression is that a lot of those that do abstain do so because they haven't found a boyfriend or girlfriend. Correct or not, that is my impression.
No matter all of the hullabaloo about Palin's family - She is clearly not ready to be VP, much less a VP for an old man who will, based on health stats probablilities, have serious health/.mental decline during his first time. If McCain has a stroke or heart attack, can you imagine Palin as instantly our president? No way. And even if he makes it ok, can you imagine her being president of the Senate (one of the VPs jobs) and would the Senators even accept her in that role. NO NO NO.
No way, No how, No McCain/Palin
Palin needs to withdraw so someone else can be selected and people still at least have an option to chose a Republican president/vice president. I wouldn't trust anything some of these Republicans are saying to support this selection. They want McCain to win and have no choice right now but to support her. That doesn't mean they really do, are just supporting the party line.
I have only the best wishes for the Palin family and do respect the achievements she seems to have accomplished. Still I can imagine what a disaster this will be if by some long shot the McCain/Palin ticket does actually win in the election.
Posted by: Susan | September 1, 2008 4:24 PM | Report abuse
There is nothing worse than an illiterate conservative. . . .
Posted by: T Phantom | September 1, 2008 4:24 PM | Report abuse
Needless to say, I am extremely concerned for the future of our country.
Posted by: Earlmil | September 1, 2008 4:24 PM | Report abuse
I don't care about her teenage daughter having a baby. I AM MORE CONCERNED ABOUT HER RUNNING FOR VP WITH A SPECIAL NEEDS CHILD UNDER 1 YEAR OLD! I have a special needs child in my family & know FIRST HAND JUST HOW MUCH WORK IT TAKES TO RAISE A CHILD WITH SPECIAL NEEDS!
I do not have a problem with her running, just not right now! This child needs her COMPLETE ATTENTION for the next few years! I really don't think that she can do that & run for VP at the same time! Just the fact that she considered running tells me where her priorities actually lie!
Posted by: Michael Souza | September 1, 2008 4:23 PM | Report abuse
This can't be true! What a monster!
--------------------------------------------
This is statutory rape. The daughter is only 17 years old. As the chief executive of the great state of Alaska, Governor Palin should be prosecuting the father of the fetus. That sounds extreme, right? However, Mrs. Palin's daughter has been dating a 26 year old man for three years, which would have made him 23 and her 14 when they started dating. That sounds even worse.
Posted by: David | September 1, 2008 4:21 PM
Posted by: Gina | September 1, 2008 4:23 PM | Report abuse
Bill that retarded new born is actually Willow's baby.
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 4:23 PM | Report abuse
I am a boomer - quite feminist - but maybe when parents have FIVE children, ONE of them should STAY HOME and raise them!!!!!!!!! and what's your thinking about teaching abstinence??? Edwards has an affair and he can't even show up for the convention!! OH PLEASE!! McCain has an affair - DUMPS his first wife because she's no longer PRETTY - an marries a woman 20 years younger. FAMILY VALUES????????
Posted by: obamacan1 | September 1, 2008 4:23 PM | Report abuse
"McCain officials said the news of the daughter's pregnancy was being released to rebut what one aide called 'mud-slinging and lies' circulating on liberal blog sites."
You don't think the McCain officials made their announcement today - at the very moment Gustav hit land - in the hope it would get lost in the news?
Unthinkable, who’d be so scheming?
Posted by: Hoosier | September 1, 2008 4:23 PM | Report abuse
Someone above referred to Palin's 17-year old daughter as "illegitimately pregnant?" How is that? Does she means that it is not a real pregnancy? Or it is against the law? I laugh at these people who are trying to make this a "political" issue.
Posted by: Nickyle | September 1, 2008 4:23 PM | Report abuse
Babies born to unwed parents have been happening for centuries. There is probably not one parent, conservative or liberal, who really relishes the idea of a 17 child being pregnant; however, it happens. Parents cannot be with their children 24 hours a day, unless, they are chaperoned or have Secret Service protecting them. From what I have read and heard, Miss Chelsea was living with a boy while she was in college, her parents were cohabitating while they were in college,Barney Frank had a young prostitute (male) operating out of his home, Obama's mother gave birth to him out of wedlock, Carter's kids were smoking pot and doing whatever, Reagan's younger children certainly weren't saints, Clinton was groping and tearing a woman's blouse open in his office while President, as well as having sex with a young Intern, Edwards has fathered a baby while married, Kennedy had numerous liaisons with women while President, even a mobster's girlfriend, Bobby Kennedy was sleeping with Marilyn Monroe, but, yet, nothing is said of that. The Palin's daughter is not the President, nor the Vice-President, and if the worst thing she can do is be pregnant, keep the child, marry the father, then my hats off to the Palins. I am certainly glad she is not going to abort the child!!! As for Sarah Palin, her ability to be Vice-President should never be diminished nor judged on an incident she had no control over. 17 year old girls aren't like they were in the early 1920's or 30's. Unfortunately, the crap they see on TV and movies seem to make it alright...no holds barred...no matter what you demonstrate or say to your children sometimes doesn't get through to them.
I think when the truth comes out, you are going to find that Obama and Biden have a much shadier past than any one of the Republicans...unfortunately, the liberal press will not be the one to talk about it.
Sarah Palin has proven to be a leader, a reformer, and fully capable of being our Vice-President or our President, and I will gladly spend my time, being an advocate and spreading the word.
Anybody who criticizes Ms. Palin because she is a woman and not staying home taking care of things evidently has no conception of what a woman can do!!! Why is a man so much more capable of holding public office than a proven leader like Sarah Palin!!!
I am 75 years old, not senile, not feeble, not forgetful (except what I want to forget), and saying John McCain is too old is as bad as saying Obama is too black.
Posted by: Cleo | September 1, 2008 4:23 PM | Report abuse
Very well put and good post Agraria.
Posted by: Cryos | September 1, 2008 4:23 PM | Report abuse
For me, bottom line is not Palin's daughter's pregnancy: It's the fact that, very cutely but very appropriately, she asked what the vice president does.
Maybe, just maybe, if McCain wasn't 72, didn't have any health problems, didn't have an explosive temper (gotta remember the old Blood Pressure), and wasn't associated in many minds with the Good Old Boy Political school...maybe then the pick of an inexperienced VP who has not made really good choices in her own personal lifestyle (have 5 children but be more interested in a career than in child-rearing), would be acceptable. Cute, gun-toting, rabble-rousing is not going to be enough if this country gets into real trouble.
Posted by: Mary T | September 1, 2008 4:23 PM | Report abuse
The powerful word "forgivness" is fine and upstanding, but that's not the main issue we should address!
When a family daughter gets pregnant, that shows that there is an absolute denial of sufficient parenting. Yes, we have children that do things behind our backs and always will, but if a parent let's a child wonder into unknown secretcies, especially when their hormones are rushing to have sex, the there is the fact of isufficient monitoring or should he say, "insufficeint parenting!" Tell me how a woman, that can't monitor her own children, how is she going to pay attention to the conditions of the United States of America? Moreover, how does she have the capablity of solving the well known problems of America on such a degree as journalism? Especially, when she has openly admitted that she has no idea of the responsibilities of a vice president? That's if to say, "An ordinary person with no intricacy knowledge of the Law is going to represent another in a Court of Law?!" Come on people, you can't represent someone who has no knowledge of the same! I'm sorry, but I thought the American people was much more intelligence than that? BASIC common knowledge informs you that an ordinary person such as a city street worker, not that I have anything against a street worker, which I have more respect for than her, has no idea how to represent you, you mean to tell me that is who you would hire from your hard earned money to try and save you from the penitentiary? Your saying the same exact thing! Who threw the thick wool over your eyes, and of course, your brain? I wish them all the luck though, their going to need it in the future. Alright, I will do more than that, I'll pray for her, even though she not competent to take office of responsibility!
Posted by: Randy S. Valance | September 1, 2008 4:23 PM | Report abuse
This woman and her running mate are supposed to stand for "values", which normally includes appropriate parenting and instilling wisdom in your kids. Maybe the Palins should build a web site (how about contraceptives411.com?) and make sure their kids and others learn the rudiments of Not Getting Pregnant. It's obvious Just Say No ain't working in the Palin family, but then, it ain't working anywhere in the U.S. or the rest of the globe. Get real, Republicans! Teach contraception!
Posted by: sally | September 1, 2008 4:23 PM | Report abuse
"She is ethical to a fault"
exactly... oh wait, you meant that as a good thing?
Posted by: Alana | September 1, 2008 4:22 PM | Report abuse
"Judy, Sarah Palin is the US's answer to Margaret Thatcher! Anyone
who thinks she cannot handle the job or deal briskly and efficiently with
ANY issue, including foreign governments ... well, they haven't met our Sarah
.
As an Alaskan resident as well as a resident of Wasilla, AK, where
Sarah Palin was at one time Mayor ... I can speak with confidence. Governor
Sarah Palin of Alaska is exactly what she portrayed during her introduction
this morning and exactly what our US Government needs. She is ethical to a
fault (if there is such a thing), a refreshing change to the status-quo and
as smart and determined a PERSON (gender really isn't an issue here as far
as I'm concerned) as anyone could ask for at the head of government.
Sarah is no naïve "small town mayor" - she just *started out* there.
Btw, as Mayor of Wasilla, she brought this "small town" through a lot of
GOOD changes and left it at the end of her term having grown to the 4th
largest CITY in Alaska - a lot of growth and a stronger economic base than
ever before.
She has EXECTUTIVE experience *running a government* (something NONE
of the other candidates can actually boast, even John McCain ) as
Governor of Alaska and got there by defeating the *incumbent* Republican
Governor, who was definitely part of the "old school" and who WAS very much
in the pocket of the big oil companies. We in Alaska wanted change - and we
got it in the person of Sarah Palin!
Sarah Palin is everything she looks to be and more. Her approval
rating as Governor of Alaska has been as high as 95% and is currently
leveled out consistently in the upper 80 percentile throughout the state
(and in both parties) - the HIGHEST approval rating of ANY sitting Governor.
Sarah has been turning around corruption in the Legislature of
Alaska - turning things on their ear for that matter; cutting spending in
spite of the increased income the state is currently receiving due to the
high oil prices - she has insisted on putting a huge amount of the
"windfall" into savings for the future rather than spending, spending,
spending - and has insisted from the get-go on what she refers to as
"honest, ethical and transparent governing" - no more closed door meetings
and dealings - the big oil companies thought she would be a pushover and
have learned better to their chagrin.
She understands the "real people" and the economic issues we all
face (Alaskans along with the rest of the country) - she was one of "us" not
long ago. Rather than passing useless "laws" or throwing money at pet
projects, she (most recently) temporarily suspended the state gas tax (on
gasoline at the pumps, fuel oil and natural gas for homes, etc.) and has
ordered checks issued to ALL residents of Alaska this fall in an attempt to
assist with the burden of high fuel costs for the upcoming winter. I could
go on and on, but that's enough for now . She isn't doing these
things to be popular - she is doing it because her constituents are HURTING
financially and she can help.
She became Governor of Alaska by defeating the Incumbent Republican
Governor and doing it *without* the money or the support of the Republican
Party, which was amazing in itself - and she won by a landslide. The "powers
that be" at that time totally underestimated Sarah and learned better the
hard way. She has done exactly what she claimed she was going to do and is
just as popular today as the day she was elected - perhaps more so since
even the Democrats up here seem to like her - she works well with both sides
in the Legislature here.
Sarah "belongs" to us (Alaskans) ... and although we are going to be
terribly sorry to see her leave before she finishes the job she started here
(two years ago) straightening out OUR State ... we understand she is
needed for a bigger purpose and hopefully her Lt. Governor will be able to
fill her shoes here and continue the job.
As for worrying about what would happen if McCain were to die or
step down or whatever ... Theta, up here in AK we've only been wondering how
long we would be able to KEEP Sarah in Alaska and have seen her as our first
woman President of the USA from the start. It's always been a matter of
whether she would wait until the end of her TWO terms as Governor (no doubt
at ALL that she would be re-elected if she ran for a second term at the end
of her current term) ... or end up in Washington sooner. She could do the
job TODAY.
Personally, I feel a lot better about McCain now that I know he has
someone as savvy, as strong, as ethical and as steady as Sarah at his back.
She will be an excellent Vice President ... and my guess is will be our US
Republican Presidential candidate in four years - AND by then the country
will KNOW here - will love and respect her as we do here - and she'll win by
as much of a landslide as she did here in Alaska. I only wonder if McCain
has a clue what he is unleashing on the US of A . She is going to be a
fresh wind, but also a strong wind.
Is that enough of an endorsement? If not, I'll add this ... Jerry
and I have for many years felt the best "vote" was to vote for the lesser of
two "evils" and hope they didn't do too much damage. Two years ago during
our State Governor's race was the first time EVER that we actually asked for
not just a little sign to put in our yard showing our support of our
candidate (something we've never felt the desire to do at all before) - we
asked for a full 4' x 8' "SARAH PALIN FOR GOVERNOR!" sign and were proud to
have it. She hasn't let us or Alaska down. She will do the same for the USA
if given the opportunity.
Feel free to pass this on to anyone who may be interested (and spam
those who aren't!).
Posted by: You Know It's True | September 1, 2008 4:22 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "What was this poor girl doing out on stage holding the new baby?"
Good grief. She is not holding the new baby. She is still pregnant. Governor Palin just had a baby in April.
Get with the program.
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 4:22 PM | Report abuse
In California, the "dad" would be in jail no questions asked... and maybe in most parts of the country...
Posted by: CA REP | September 1, 2008 4:22 PM | Report abuse
Thank God these kids aren't being raised by 2 queers! That would really mess them up!
Posted by: TJK | September 1, 2008 4:22 PM | Report abuse
With this news of Palin's daughter having sex with all these men in Alaska we must ask ourselves before voting for McCain/Palin if we really need anymore postitutes in Washington.
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 4:21 PM | Report abuse
A major D'oh! slap on the head for the McCain camp. Pallin was picked to appeal to the social conservatives, but she raised a daughter who couldn't wait until she was 18, or much less for marriage. What kind of example is that?
-a frustrated McCain fan.
Posted by: What the? | September 1, 2008 4:21 PM | Report abuse
This is what happens when the media is caught by surprise and is unable to publicly vet a potential nominee. Now, after the knee-jerk decision Senator McCain has made, Palin will be vetted by the media on a daily basis-- everyday something new will come out-- be it positive or negative. Essentially, we all know the skeletons of McCain, Obama & Biden, but really who is Sarah Palin?
It seems this is yet another reason for me to cast my vote with Senator Obama.
Posted by: Common Man | September 1, 2008 4:21 PM | Report abuse
fells like poorly paid Obama bloggers from Bangladesh are very active posting here...
say it ain't so - Joe
Posted by: american | September 1, 2008 4:21 PM | Report abuse
doofus mccain should ask palin to withdraw from the nomination.
then he could telephone britney spears, (since he saw her once on VH-l) and ask her if she would join him on the mccain/spears ticket.
Posted by: art allen | September 1, 2008 4:21 PM | Report abuse
The Republicans lucked out with this hurricane. I feel for the folks who live down in the path of the storm. And I will donate what I can when I am called. But I gotta say, I'm sure McCain and Company sighed a big one when the President and his evil VP decided not to associate with the party this week. Best thing that could have happened for them. The Republicans sure have lost their way. And this, the party of Lincoln. They should be ashamed. Bush's approval rating is at 29%. Cheney's is at 14%. Disgusting.
Posted by: Ed Samuels | September 1, 2008 4:21 PM | Report abuse
Cover up? Ploy? Reflections of Character?
Come on people. This is meaningless, immaterial, and has no bearing on the future of our nation. Get your brains working on the harder stuff and off the Jerry Springer subjects.
Posted by: A. Merican | September 1, 2008 4:21 PM | Report abuse
In the wake of ALL of her KNOWN scandalous conduct, Sarah Palin’s DECISION to accept McSame’s offer to be vice president show’s how politically naïve and vulnerable she is at politics.
She is the NEOCON DREAM in terms of their ability to control matters (i.e, the White House) if something were to happen to McSame.
Posted by: Lame McSame | September 1, 2008 4:21 PM | Report abuse
Agree 110% with Ken, "Keep the baby - Abort the candidacy." Perplexing choice by McCain... On so so many levels it just doesn't make any sense. If Mc was playing the "woman" card why not someone like Condi? To accept the nomination Sarah - given her family situation - appears to be such a hypocrite as the choice itself flies in the face of conservative values. And, who in their right mind gets on a plane for nine hours after their water breaks for the fifth (?) child??? Beyond belief! (My second child was born 4 hours after my water broke...) We're supposed to trust this person with our safety? How safe was that choice to her child? McCain met Palin only a few times... WHAT was his campaign thinking? The image of the two together kind of subtly enforces the womanizer image for McCain... Again, What??? My heart and prayers are with the Palin family. I believe that Sarah Palin has been set up by McCain's horrible judgement and I hope that the media treads softly and her family doesn't pay to high a price. What a mismatch! What an insult to the office of Vice President. (Not to mention, what an insult to Hillary and women in general...)
Posted by: Collette | September 1, 2008 4:21 PM | Report abuse
At least this child will not end up on welfare and end up sucking our system dry!!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:21 PM | Report abuse
Perhaps a great many of the really nasty posts on here should be taken with a grain of salt.
Perhaps they are being contributed by a fifth-column faction whose agenda is to create division and polarization in
American society.
These people don't want a unified American nation, no matter who happens to be President.
Not content with merely promoting anti-American sentiment abroad, these agitators want Americans to hate each other, to pit themselves against each other along demographic lines.
There is no peasantry in the US after the Marxist model, so they agitate using race, religion, gender....now they hope they can pit "liberals" and "conservatives" against each other.
It must be frustrating for these agitators who thought that they could Balkanize the US---they're way behind schedule.
Throughout the world, unscrupulous speculators deliberately use cats paws to foment polarization and chaos in order to profit from changes in financial markets.
Those agitating in the interests of for totalitarianism do the same thing, hoping that citizens will be willing to permit infringements upon their privacy and freedom in the interest of "law and order."
Individual Americans should resist their coercive manipulation by refusing to react categorically to taunting. Many times subversives poke and prod wildly in the hope of locating the emotional and ideological bulls-eye of a targeted population.
It is always good to remember that this is to remember that this is an anonymous forum, and people can post here from anywhere in the world---not to mention from atop an expensive but increasingly rickety fifth column.
.
Posted by: Agraria | September 1, 2008 4:21 PM | Report abuse
This is statutory rape. The daughter is only 17 years old. As the chief executive of the great state of Alaska, Governor Palin should be prosecuting the father of the fetus. That sounds extreme, right? However, Mrs. Palin's daughter has been dating a 26 year old man for three years, which would have made him 23 and her 14 when they started dating. That sounds even worse.
Posted by: David | September 1, 2008 4:21 PM | Report abuse
I just did a little math from the dates on Wikipedia, looks like Obama's mom was 17 when she got pregnant. Check it out yourself, LMP about 6 weeks before her 18th birthday. Uhh, when did Obama's parents get married? Maybe this new baby will be a presidential candidate someday!!!
Posted by: john | September 1, 2008 4:21 PM | Report abuse
Of course all families have issues. However, this is quite unusual for prominent political candidates. It's too easy for liberals to play the "hypocrite" card, even if it applies. I think the conservatives will gulp and say, "Life is full of wonderful little surprises." Would they ever be so generous to poor, minority teenage mothers? This family needs parenting in a big way. Sometimes parents need to put family before career. I'm not interested in having the "Palin Bunch" be the next US embarrassment and distraction from world and national crises. Families need privacy. I don't see how Sarah can be truly successful in both arenas. She's going to have to find a surrogate VP, mom or both. If she believes what she preaches about family, then mom and dad have to be present and responsible for their kids. So far, I'm not sure they pass the national parent standard test.
Posted by: SMC | September 1, 2008 4:20 PM | Report abuse
This does not detract from Republicans pro-life platform. If anything, it adds to it.
No Christian in their right mind would vote for Obama. The reason that teen pregnancies would be reduced is because he is in favor of killing people's "mistakes" (his words, not mine - in the quotes).
Sure, she shouldn't have had premarital sex, but as least she is taking responsibility for it by keeping the baby.
Posted by: Mrs. Wittmann | September 1, 2008 4:20 PM | Report abuse
How old is the father? Is he really 25?
Posted by: outraged | September 1, 2008 4:20 PM | Report abuse
Last time I checked it was illegal for a minor to have sex with an adult - If Bristol is 17 now, how old was she 5 months ago? Was she 16? Did mommy-gov know that she was having intercourse, underage and out of wedlock?
I'll do you one better.... Maybe the state trooper who Palin tried to get thrown out of his job was on to this sordid story and she stepped in, abused her Gubernatorial power in order to snuff the story...
hmm...Obama has to be behind this
P.S. I am one of the 18-million Hillary supporters - now I don't know what to do in November
Posted by: Mike L. | September 1, 2008 4:20 PM | Report abuse
I'm a liberal, and I'm not going to criticize Sarah or Bristol. I'm not going to criticize them because from the liberal point of view, it's none of my business, and none of anyone else's, either. What I DO expect, is for the conservatives to criticize both of them - Sarah for not being an effective mother, and Bristol for getting pregnant as a minor, unwed, and not-yet out of high school. If the conservatives don't criticize them - because they've just gone against everything they stand for - then they're hypocrites.
Not that it matters, in the end. McCain is done. Even the most objective analysis of the situation is pointing to an Obama victory.
Posted by: Daniel | September 1, 2008 4:20 PM | Report abuse
"I'm also ashamed at some of the people who claim to be in my Party. The hate filled rants coming from supposed Democratic voters is disturbing and will not help in November. You've got to tone it down because not only do you come off as raving lunatics whom NOBODY will want to give control of the country, you're also disingenuous."
As a independent I just realized I have nothing in common with the Dem/Liberals on this page.
McCain/Palin 08!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:20 PM | Report abuse
Thanks GOP.. You now have put the poster family up for white trash in line for the presidency, whats your next move? Keep peddling your family values. It seems all you have to do is talk about them not practice them... this is getting sick
Posted by: erik | September 1, 2008 4:20 PM | Report abuse
I feel sorry for most of the liberals on this thread. Your lack of character is showing. The liberal idealist eutopia is just as big of a religion as conservative religions, and you are bigots and hypocrits who use the same faith based "morality" but call it idealogy as the people you criticize.
Some of the classic liberals in the democratic party still retain tolerance, ability to disagree and compromise, open mindedness, etc but most of you are a disgrace.
Posted by: Cryos | September 1, 2008 4:20 PM | Report abuse
Well then, maybe the MEDIA should do a little investigative reporting (for once) and get to the bottom of these rumors.
If this woman lied for months about being pregnant and giving birth while in office, then she is not a very trustworthy person.
This story is getting more and more bizarre....
Posted by: ORL | September 1, 2008 4:20 PM | Report abuse
Her daughter's pregnancy is very much a political issue IMO. It is another demonstration of the effects of the Republican approach to sex education and issues of pregnancy. Here is a 17 year old girl, certainly brought up within the dictates of the "abstinence only" mindset, who, like many brought up in such an atmosphere, now finds herself pregnant with a family that of course absolutely insists that she keep the child. There is no doubt that the daughter has no choice at all of whether to have an abortion or to marry the father. The conservative parents, no matter what is really in the child's best interest are certainly insisting that she marry the father and keep the baby. Not only this, but this is what she would like to require of all people in America who find themselves in the same situation. Take away choice, take away opportunity, take away education. This is the perfect example of the results of Republican policy and mindset.
I want to see Sarah Palin asked these questions directly: "Did you give your daughter education on birth control and did you offer to provider her with birth control? Did you give your daughter the option of having an abortion? Did you tell your daughter that she needed to marry the father?"
Yes, this IS a political issue, VERY MUCH SO!
Posted by: Jeff | September 1, 2008 4:20 PM | Report abuse
Marie Stewart's rationalizing non-sequiturs are just that--nonsensical. She misses completely that McCain's team knew about the pregnancy and, because true conservatives believe it's no one's business, they acted on that belief. Seems like all the hate here is coming from the opportunistic socialist left.
Ms. Stewart sadly forgot the first rule of analyzing someone else's motives: Walk a mile in the other person's shoes first to understand, not only their behavior, but how they see the world. Clearly, they don't see the world as the jaded cynic AnD double poster you are, Marie.
What's the matter, Marie, didn't you think anyone saw your original idiocy that you felt it had to be posted again? Remember: Twice nothing is still nothing.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:19 PM | Report abuse
I believe that a woman of any age should have as much sex as she wants, and can have children or not, soley dependent upon what she wants, without any influence from government, or family. Having said that, since it is illegal to have sex with underage girls, I believe that it should be mandatory that underage pregnancies be terminated as the product of an illegal activity, and that both the girl and the boy go to prison for the exact same length of time. All politics aside, that is fair.
Posted by: bill gates | September 1, 2008 4:19 PM | Report abuse
For how much longer is the anti-intellectual establishment (despite their lip-service to education) going to avoid (in order to foster an underclass of service workers) the reality of how uninhibited procreation is not only selfish and irresponsible but unethical on this overburdened planet? How much consumption and waste does this Good Christian Family equate?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:19 PM | Report abuse
News Flash! This just in from a FLY who was on the wall when McCain and Steve Schmidt decided on Palin a week ago today: - Schmidt: "Sir, we are tanking with our right wing base. We need a real hard-liner for VP." - McCain: "Did you know I was a POW?" - Schmidt: "Yes sir, but the VP pick - we need a Pat Buchanan type, red meat person." - McCain: - "Ah, red meat, I love to BBQ." - Schmidt: "Yes sir, we also need to try to get all of those angry Hillary backers to come over to our side." - McCain: "Didn't Hillary get the nomination?" - Schmidt: " Um, no sir, Obama won. But, sir, I talked to my mentor, Karl Rove, and he has the PERFECT solution. Sarah Palin." - McCain: "Sarah who?" - Schmidt: "Sarah Palin, the new Alaska governor." - McCain: "But we need someone from the U.S." - Schmidt: "Alaska IS part of the U.S." - McCain: "Oh, right. Guess I had a 'senior moment' there. Ha!" - Schmidt: - "Anyway, sir, how about Palin? We'll put out the word that you two are 'Soulmates' which will really please our right wingers. And women ALWAYS vote for other women so she'll get all of those angry HRC voters, too." - McCain: "I see - it's a TWOFER! We get the base AND the broads! Brilliant!" - Schmidt: "But we have to move fast, sir. No time for vetting. We have a short window here. So you call Palin, and we'll arrange a quickie meeting." - McCain: "A quickie? Oh, no, no, I don't think Cindy would approve. Have I told you about my time as a POW?" And the rest is history....
Posted by: MB | September 1, 2008 4:19 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "As a pastor of my church and father of three I am proof that abstinence works!"
As a "father of three", apparently you didn't abstain.
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 4:19 PM | Report abuse
Hello POST. Please remove comment:
"Posted by: TRUTH | September 1, 2008 4:15 PM"
Thank you.
Posted by: geef1968 | September 1, 2008 4:19 PM | Report abuse
Can somebody on this board explain why a cover up is okay?
We have a campaign that was forced to come clean probably because Republican donors started demanding answers before they sent in any more cash!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:19 PM | Report abuse
In response to the post by "teenager"....Well said!! You are one sharp girl, and you will go far with that attitude!
Posted by: Cate | September 1, 2008 4:18 PM | Report abuse
"The real issue is that Palin is running for VP right as her daughter is going through this crisis, exposing her daughter to even more stress and ridicule in an already stressful situation!!!!! And that IS a real issue that should be addressed that has nothing to do with her daughter's life and all to do with Palin's judgement."
I agree. At this stage it doesn't do much good to castigate the intrusiveness of the media, which is a separate issue. This intrusiveness was well-established when Ms. Palin accepted the offer of the VP office. The question is: why did she think it would be a good idea to expose her daughter to this kind of scrutiny? What good does it do to blame the media once the cat is out of the bag? Her daughter still have to live with it.
Expecting the media to leave a story like this alone is naive, and as unrealistic as expecting McCain to actually run a high-minded campaign based on the issues. Oh, wait, I actually fell for that last one.
Posted by: Mary in CT | September 1, 2008 4:18 PM | Report abuse
Ah, yes, family values. Rethuglican hypocrites.
Posted by: Old_Grandad | September 1, 2008 4:18 PM | Report abuse
This woman has subjected her daughter to national scrutiny and now asks that she have her privacy? Are you kidding me? What was this poor girl doing out on stage holding the new baby? I don't get it. I guess she was hoping no one would hear the rumors about the baby and she wouldn't have to tell the secret. Crazy!! I still don't get the story about her flying back from Texas while 7 months pregnant and leaking fluid. No pregnant woman is supposed to fly and after having 4 children, she should know that. So should her husband. Why didn't she go to a hospital in Texas? This is so very irresponsible. If she is that irresponsible when it comes to her own child, how can she possibly be considered a good choice for Vice President? Lack of any kind of good judgment in my opinion. By the way, Democrats did not start the "mud slinging and lies". I personally read it on a blog of an ALASKAN newspaper. Her fellow ALASKANS were "slinging it" about their own Governor. Chris, can you on occasion try a little research before you "repeat" the Republicans' charges against Democrats. I don't sling mud or anything else at anyone. Like Obama, I try to discourage it at every possible turn.
Posted by: sweladi | September 1, 2008 4:18 PM | Report abuse
Well, enough talk about morals this and morals that — I want to hear from the husband-to-be and put the date on my calendar.
Posted by: max post | September 1, 2008 4:18 PM | Report abuse
Glad to see that there are no judgmental people commenting here.
Glad there is no hypocrisy either.
Sorry for the sarcasm.
Posted by: napacab | September 1, 2008 4:17 PM | Report abuse
Most of us in the mainland of the USA do not miss the Moose meat, and avoid it. Perhaps Congress should call an urgent session to ban it altogether even in Alaska and call the species - untouchable. Those Moose are too horny, literally, and the mass effects they can produce over the entire population may be catastrophic. We've got to be prudent. Also, a great deal of fishing opportunities in Alaska leave fishy effects even in the heartland here. Forget the politics, the family stuff, and future of America and so on. This stuff is causing a lasting effect on a day to day basis, folks. A bridge to nowhere is exactly what a few Alaskans will appreciate at this time.
Posted by: O. P. Neon | September 1, 2008 4:17 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "Why are we saying that Palin can't manage her own family and thus can't manage America? Clinton couldn't manage his own male desires but we seem to think he did just fine managing America...
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:13 PM "
And Hillary couldn't manage her own financial affairs and is a proven habitual liar, but the double standard is in effect here.
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 4:17 PM | Report abuse
This kid is 17 years old.
Not really a kid.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:17 PM | Report abuse
As a pastor of my church and father of three I am proof that abstinence works!
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 4:17 PM | Report abuse
Thea: I am a mother of a 19 year old Airman and when I vote on November 4th I am voting with him in mind. Not my pocket book. All the money in the world will not save this country if we are to cut military budget, yeah remember how well that worked for Clinton? Prelude to 911? I am voting for who I want in charge of my sons future as an American Airman and the defense of our country. I am happy to hear that Obama will cut Defense which hey as long as we have free health care who cares if our country is blown to bits?!! Really again people lets stick to the issues that these candidates will be in charge of.
Posted by: Tamara Lillie | September 1, 2008 4:17 PM | Report abuse
A rather important point that the media has thus far missed:
It is impossible that the McCain vetting team knew about this in advance.
a) McCain originally wanted to choose Lieberman, Pawlenty or Ridge. He was forced to reject these choices because the *evangelical* faction would not accept someone who did not meet their criteria for their set of values.
b) Do you therefore mean to say that, in attempting to select someone who would satisfy these values voters, the McCain team would *knowingly* select someone who has a teenage daughter who is illegitimately pregnant? Utterly contradictory and, if known, would have defeated the purpose of the choice.
c) Therefore, we also now have the issue of the McCain camp covering up its incomplete vetting by stating that they knew what they obviously did not know in the first place.
d) New exciting option! Or--the McCain team *knew* that the 16 year old daughter of his choice for VP was illegimately pregnant--as they are now saying (so it must be true) but did not reveal it--until it threatened to reveal itself.
Posted by: Marie Stewart | September 1, 2008 4:16 PM | Report abuse
"I have a 16 year old daughter. If she were 5 months pregnant I would not even go on VACATION, let alone run for office or uproot my family. I have no idea where Sarah Palin's HEART is; quite obviously her MIND is on her political future.
Shame on her. What a selfish act.
Posted by: Kasha"
And that's the difference between mediocrity and success. Maybe you're an exception but generations of kids having kids not going anywhere with the kids as an anchor.
Posted by: Cryos | September 1, 2008 4:16 PM | Report abuse
That Sarah Palin's daughter is pregnant is utterly irrelevant to the upcoming election.
HOWEVER, if this girl is the mother of the five-month-old dawn Downs Syndrome-suffering baby which Mrs. Palin claims is hers, that is a completely separate issue which reflects very poorly on the vice presidential candidate since it means that she concocted a complex set of lies when falsely claiming that she is the child's mother and that her 17-year-old daughter took several months off from school because she was suffering from mononucleosis.
For one thing, a fraudulently prepared birth certificate would have to have been arranged for by the candidate and her husband with the connivance of medical persons.
Because it appears that the candidate flew from Alaska to Texas shortly before she was ostensibly about to give birth to a Downs Syndrome suffering child, that she ostensibly broke water in Texas, did not immediately seek medical attention there but flew back to Alaska and drove a considerable distance to a hospital, ostensibly to give birth, this confluence of circumstances creates prima facie but rebuttable proof that the five-month-old child is not the candidate's and, therefore that Mrs. Palin lied and helped create false an official birth certificate document.
The burden is therefore on Mrs. Palin to authorize the disclosure of her and her daughter's medical records relevant to the pregnancy leading to the child's birth and the actual delivery of that child.
It has been argued that Mrs. may have concealed the fact that the child was her daughter's in order to protect the girl and that this is admirable. That position is inconsistent with the candidate's and her fans' current position (a respectable one) that the current girl's pregnancy is not particularly shameful since it is in the nature of things, in many and excellent families, but girls get pregnant out of wedlock and that this is not anything to be significantly out of the ordinary and shameful. The proof of this proposition is that Mrs. Palin has now revealed her to his current pregnancy.
Posted by: Roland Thau | September 1, 2008 4:16 PM | Report abuse
I'm also ashamed at some of the people who claim to be in my Party. The hate filled rants coming from supposed Democratic voters is disturbing and will not help in November. You've got to tone it down because not only do you come off as raving lunatics whom NOBODY will want to give control of the country, you're also disingenuous. Because if you think Gov. Palin was a bad choice, then SHUT UP ABOUT IT. She'll bring down the ticket, Obama will win, and we will win. Good grief.
Posted by: True Dem | September 1, 2008 4:16 PM | Report abuse
The news re. the pregnancy of Sarah Palin’s daughter is too convenient. Could this be a coverup of the first coverup? We will never know for sure. Again, convently, she will not “give birth until after the November election. Either way, Gov. Palin was not entirely honest with the American People. What does this tell you about her character?
Posted by: janet gordon | September 1, 2008 4:16 PM | Report abuse
There is a black man behind bars for having sex on mutual consent with a 17 year old girl.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:16 PM | Report abuse
First we learn "Sarah Palin 7 months ago gave birth to a Downes Syndrome baby without ever looking pregnant", "during time 16 year old daughter missed school for 7 months for mono", and "flew 12 hours after he water broke", and "travelled to remote clinic to deliver"?
Now we learn same daughter is pregnant?
Oh, It's Just Fine and Normal...
for minor 17 year old Daughter of "A Family Values Evangelical Christian Republican Vice Presidential Candidate" -- "Has A Baby Out of Wedlock"?
However... If it Were a 17 year old minor daughter of a Democrat Vice Presidential Candidate -
If Would Be A SIN and a Scandal!
You Bet!
Posted by: Realista | September 1, 2008 4:15 PM | Report abuse
Pull out next time. Or have her swallow.
Stupid kids.
Posted by: TRUTH | September 1, 2008 4:15 PM | Report abuse
Jimmy Carters Brother was an alcoholic and he won the election. In Fact Billy Carter made millions on his Beer... Let it Rest people. The Republican Party is the best for America. Remember Obama says That White America is holding on to its Guns and Religion.....Lets Not forget....The problem with America is that we worry about the petty stuff. Its a Great Ticket and They will win.
Posted by: Andy | September 1, 2008 4:15 PM | Report abuse
Dems blew this election by not having Hillary as the VP. That would've sealed the fate for 08, and Now they(the far left/ Liberals) pick on Palin and worse on her daughter.
Posted by: vic | September 1, 2008 4:15 PM | Report abuse
I don't know if you Republican operatives realize it or not, but no one believes that Obama's people are behind all this.
Posted by: Mary | September 1, 2008 4:15 PM | Report abuse
disgusteddem I'd be disgusted too if my party were taken over by women and the gays.
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 4:15 PM | Report abuse
Republicans are hypocrites, plain and simple. Rush, O'Reilly, Newt, McCain (cheated on his first wife and left her for someone 30 years younger because...he was a POW!!!), Hannity, Bush the drunkard...do as I say, America, not as I do. It's unreal. And they slam the Dems and not having 'moral and family values'. What a sad state of affairs.
Posted by: Dondee Littleton | September 1, 2008 4:14 PM | Report abuse
This show how abstinence-only thinking is out of touch with the real world. Children should be taught: "don't have sex-- but if you do, be smart and use a condom."
Posted by: Scott | September 1, 2008 4:14 PM | Report abuse
UMMMMM - 17 years old and dating for 3 years? WHo's your Daddy??? oh a 26 year old college student. Let's play "do the math!" What kind of parents allow for a 14 year old to date a 23 year old? This speaks to the character of Sarah Palin, if she were anyone else you'd be calling them white trash.
Posted by: Chris Anderson | September 1, 2008 4:14 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "Any republican still voting for McCain is voting with their pocket book only. This completely wiped out their pro-life platform."
And how did this wipe out their pro-life platfore. The daughter is going to marry the father, have the baby, and live happily ever after. Explain to me how this is wiping out a pro-life platform.
Sheesh, libs are stupid.
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 4:14 PM | Report abuse
No surprise here! Isn't that what evangelical women are for? To breed and breed and breed and breed.... I'm sure this is just the first of many more to come! Congratulations Happy Breeding!
Posted by: Jennifer | September 1, 2008 4:13 PM | Report abuse
Levi sells cartoon balloons in town; he calls his child Jesus ...
This is the craziest election in modern history!!
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Posted by: johng1 | September 1, 2008 4:13 PM | Report abuse
goodbye mccain
Posted by: the end | September 1, 2008 4:13 PM | Report abuse
Sarah Palin is putting her career ahead of her children's welfare. She is already running a broken family let alone running the country. Something is not right with this family. McCain lost his marbles when he chose Sarah as his running mate. It will doom him on Nov. 4.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:13 PM | Report abuse
Nobody is perfect.
But how can Sarah Palin be a role model, as claimed?
Posted by: Henry | September 1, 2008 4:13 PM | Report abuse
I don't care. I don't know this person, and if anyone can deny that politicians are not treated like celebrities, here is plenty of proof to the contrary.
Posted by: Alice | September 1, 2008 4:13 PM | Report abuse
Wow at age of 14 I didn't even know what dating is. I would never let a 23 year old man come near my child. That is terrible.
She was just 3 years older than Malia Obama when she started the relation with this man.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:13 PM | Report abuse
Why are we saying that Palin can't manage her own family and thus can't manage America? Clinton couldn't manage his own male desires but we seem to think he did just fine managing America...
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:13 PM | Report abuse
OK if this 17 YEAR OLD GIRL was with a 26 year old MAN. why did Palin put her daughter on birth control. dont tell me u dont know ur 17 yr old kid is with some MAN and that they are having sex. Come on here. when i starting having sex at 16 my mom raced to the dr. to get me on the pill! Responsibility people! I would figure a being a pro-life mother!, she would have her daughters on birth control so situations like his DONT HAPPEN. And so little girls dont have to start families. This will definitely hurt her vote. Like it or not!
Posted by: Heather | September 1, 2008 4:13 PM | Report abuse
The question should not be about whether or not Palin should be on the Republican ticket. It should be about whether or not McCain should be on the Republican ticket. Delegates should be seriously considering this issue at this time. McCain has shown a serious disregard for the party and for the American people by knowingly subjecting us to his recklessness.
Posted by: Joe L | September 1, 2008 4:13 PM | Report abuse
One can only hope the daddy is at most 18 years and four months old, or else them law-and-order Repubs are going to have to prosecute him for felony sexual abuse.
Posted by: mishi | September 1, 2008 4:12 PM | Report abuse
I'm still confused here. Did McCain really know about this controversy or not? Chris, you really need to get to the bottom of this. I can't believe Sen. McCain would have gone ahead with this choice had he known. It's going to completely distract from his campaign message. Can the WP please enlighten us? Please?
Posted by: Army Brat | September 1, 2008 4:12 PM | Report abuse
"Univ of Alaska... He's 26. Why isn't he in jail?
Posted by: Samantha | September 1, 2008 4:10 PM "
Sarah Palin must have picked up the phone.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:12 PM | Report abuse
No, Gretchen, they did vet the candidate to their satisfaction and they've stated as much. If you disagree, show evidence to the contrary. Fact is, the only evidence you've shown everyone is that your values and standards DIFFER from what the Republicans used. And that's about it.
Big whoop there.
Posted by: Not Gretchen | September 1, 2008 4:12 PM | Report abuse
Impressive that the perceived fault here is with people having premarital sex (which is an extremely good idea given sufficient access to education, disease prevention, birth control and abortion), and not with people who, like the Palins, appear unable to stop themselves from rapidly increasing the number of humans roaming the world. Five kids, already starting on the next generation, and she sees this as a blessing?
Doubling our numbers every eighteen years doesn't seem much like a recipe for sustainable growth. Given that track record, maybe not the best choice for even a symbolic position like VP.
Posted by: STM | September 1, 2008 4:12 PM | Report abuse
...the new announcement does nothing to squelch the Trig grandson rumors, since we won't know until AFTER the election whether Bristol is really pregnant now, or if she is when she got pregnant...and a "miscarriage" on November 5 could conceal even those facts...the already known fact that Palin plays fast and loose with the truth just makes this smell like coverup...
Posted by: stephen | September 1, 2008 4:12 PM | Report abuse
Good thing the father's not black or instead of announcing an upcoming marriage, there'd be an upcoming trial for statutory rape.
Posted by: rjinsd | September 1, 2008 4:12 PM | Report abuse
If my seventeen year old daughter were 5 months pregnant i'd beat her butt and find the guy who raped her and make sure he could never have relations again. ;)
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 4:12 PM | Report abuse
Wow, from the looks of these Obama blogger comments it really is turning out to be true that the Dems have become the party of sexism and exploitation.
I am ashamed of my party.
Posted by: disgusteddem | September 1, 2008 4:12 PM | Report abuse
So it seems obvious what happened here..another conservative gun loving abortion denying intolerant family...the dad is the father, the mon said it is hers, the dad really likes his daughter....we all know what happens with incest babies....
And the republicans think they are the ones with moral values....
Posted by: No Way McCain | September 1, 2008 4:12 PM | Report abuse
I thought the Palins were from Alaska and not West Virginia.
Well, Alaska... West Virginia... what's the difference.
Posted by: Buck Fush | September 1, 2008 4:12 PM | Report abuse
I don't think that there is any issue with
Palin's daughter being pregnant. However, I think it is noteworthy becuase the last 8 years we have had "moral values" shoved down out throats by the republicans. I think that many of the reactions to this are too tough, but people are angry. Statistics have shown an increase in STDs and teen pregnancies since the introduction of abstanance only education, but the extreme rights keeps pushing it along with many other ideas that go against the statistics. I think this is one of those stories that makes you scratch your head.
Posted by: Jeff | September 1, 2008 4:12 PM | Report abuse
So she has a seventeen year old daughter that she was not obviously at the side of 24 hours a day. What parent is? She made the mistake that a lot of young kids make. Where does it say that vp candidates kids have to be perfect. I know a lot of you have a hard time excepting this fact but no one is. Oh, and by the way why is this such a big deal when we had a U.S. president who did who knows what with who knows who and that was perfectly acceptable. Please explain.
Posted by: Rhonda | September 1, 2008 4:12 PM | Report abuse
Beverly Hillbillies in igloos.
PS: Just how old was Bristol Palin when she got pregnant through the Biblical crime of pre-marital sex? And what punishment does the Bible demand for this sin?
DEATH! Leviticus 21:9; Deuteronomy 22:20-21.
No, we liberals cannot allow Sarah Palin to kill her daughter! Save Bristol Palin!
Posted by: Garak | September 1, 2008 4:11 PM | Report abuse
The fact she's pregnant proves once again that abstinence only policy does not work in even the more conservative families of the USA. I hope the ultra conservatives will rethink the never ending slamming of tee-age pregnancy.
Teen's do what one would expect to happen, HAVE SEX! The one thing ALL parents should be teaching their children is safe sexual practices and birth control (and I'm not talking about abortion, thats not birth control to me, that's the last resort). I have nothing but best wishes for the Governors family and ALL the others that have similar circumstances.
Posted by: i-told-you-so | September 1, 2008 4:11 PM | Report abuse
Sarah Palin a "soccer" mom? Sounds more like a "soap opera" mom.
Posted by: Mary | September 1, 2008 4:11 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "Sorry, Gov. Palin, but the "sanctity" of marriage in Christian circles would prevent your daughter from being married in the eyes of Jesus and the Lord. Only virgins can marry; anything else is a fraud.
Posted by: Nick | September 1, 2008 4:06 PM "
Oh Brother, Hilarious. Well, in that case about 80% of couples shouldn't be marrying.
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 4:10 PM | Report abuse
anotherstupidblogger You are obviously just a foreigner. We don't need foreign agents like you telling us what to talk about or how to fell. God have mercy on you.
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 4:10 PM | Report abuse
I have a 16 year old daughter. If she were 5 months pregnant I would not even go on VACATION, let alone run for office or uproot my family. I have no idea where Sarah Palin's HEART is; quite obviously her MIND is on her political future.
Shame on her. What a selfish act.
Posted by: Kasha | September 1, 2008 4:10 PM | Report abuse
Univ of Alaska... He's 26. Why isn't he in jail?
Posted by: Samantha | September 1, 2008 4:10 PM | Report abuse
This sounds like a soap opera for me. That's the only thing missing in the political circus we have.
I for one decided to give Obama a try. He seems intelligent and sane enough as compared to the alternative.
Posted by: Concerned citizen | September 1, 2008 4:10 PM | Report abuse
What kind of mom lets her 13 year old daughter date a guy 23. I am sorry that Palin chose to throw her own daugther under the bus, but allowing a child of 13 to date a man who is ten years older, shows an amazing lack of judgment and or interest in your own child. This is no super mom, this is at best a women who is asleep at the wheel. If she can not take care of her own how is she going to take care of this country.
Posted by: Steven | September 1, 2008 4:10 PM | Report abuse
Uh-oh!
More news on the VP choice. Sara Palin believe sin creationism!!!
Its adherents are those Christians and Jews who believe that God created the Earth in six 24-hour days, taking the Hebrew text of Genesis as a literal account.
Guess we need to get her a trip to the Grand Canyon.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:10 PM | Report abuse
So you are saying she told him, and given that they we're trying to court the Evangelical voters with this choice, they simply decided not to reveal it just yet...until it started to break.
Yes. That's much better.
Posted by: Marie Stewart | September 1, 2008 4:09 PM | Report abuse
IT'S THE LYING, STUPID!!!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:09 PM | Report abuse
Any good Christian should vote for Obama, he is for the poor and the elderly, and has more morals in his left pinky than all the Republicans together. He will at least make sure that teenage pregnancies will be reduced, a horrible example set by the Palin family.
Any republican still voting for McCain is voting with their pocket book only. This completely wiped out their pro-life platform.
Posted by: Thea | September 1, 2008 4:09 PM | Report abuse
Oh, how I love you smug Right Wingers trying to shove this airhead down our throats! Look---she can't manage her own family. How is she going to manage a country? She's a joke.
Posted by: RobinL | September 1, 2008 4:09 PM | Report abuse
What is a conservatism by the way? Conservative but not conservative enough to abstain the sex before marriage and before finishing high school? Is this the message from potential leaders to our new generation?
Posted by: Mike Kahn | September 1, 2008 4:09 PM | Report abuse
The McCain's attempt to push the internet smears on the Obama camp is a pathetic attempt to hide the fact that they didn't properly vet their nominee. Chris, thanks for at least pointing out that this wasn't true in your experience.
Posted by: Gretchen | September 1, 2008 4:09 PM | Report abuse
Palin is another one of those nutty abstinence-only supporting wingnut politicians who can't seem to grasp the limits of such an approach. Teens will do what they will do. It's obvious Bristol would've been better served with a discussion about safe sex.
Instead, she's now facing a shotgun wedding to the baby's father.
Posted by: Heather J | September 1, 2008 4:09 PM | Report abuse
So Obama's mother was a teenage mother. What's the big deal?
Actually it shows how human they are. In terms of impact on the campaign, (which should be irrelevant) it will endear them to working families facing these same challenges and will also contrast with Obama's statement that he wouldn't want to punish his children with a baby.
So keep pushing the story and attacking the candidates's daughter. It is only working against your candidate. What you fail to realize is that for every vote he gains from a Clinton endorsement, he loses 2 because of the vicious attacks of his bloggers.
Posted by: tss | September 1, 2008 4:08 PM | Report abuse
"Sarah is shameless... [mindless blather deleted]"
You're right, Sarah Palin should have become an unaccomplished community organizer. Then she'd have all the qualifications.
Posted by: Truth Detector | September 1, 2008 4:08 PM | Report abuse
"who is the baby daddy?"
I just read that the father is 25 or 26 yrs old. He's a college student??? Need more info, though.
Posted by: Jessica | September 1, 2008 4:08 PM | Report abuse
Just a thought...
Fast forward several years and one of Obama's daughters could face this decision. Given his belief she would receive support to terminate and there would be no mud slinging. If Sara Palin had a test during pregnancy that suggested a high possibility of Downs Obama's values would support aborting that baby...even late term, partial birth...botched procedure & baby lives Obama says it's ok to let that baby die.
My point being, the Palin family has choosen life. The Dems should not throw mud when their values would have allowed termination and avoiding controversary. Also, until someone has cold hard facts that Sara Palin 'faked' her pregnancy leave it alone. That is a slanderous thing to say.
I seem to remember the media having a virtual love fest last week over Obamas life story production...Hummm, teenage, unwed mother. He was raised is a large part by his grandparents. I don't remember anyone suggesting his grandmother could not 'control' him mom. Give it a rest.
This happens in America and in politics more than you know. You just don't see it because people choose abortion. The Palin's choose life. So now you want to throw mud because they 'practice what they preach'?
Posted by: Thinking in VA | September 1, 2008 4:08 PM | Report abuse
Wow! I love to listen to the Democrats criticize the pregnancy of Palin's daughter. Listen to those Democrats trash her and disparage the choice of Palin as VP candidate.
Let us not forget who is pulling the strings behind the Demoncratic nominations that you see this election year. Why, it none other than Oprah Winfrey, who also became pregnant as a child but with the help of White America, became a huge success.
Posted by: Richard E. | September 1, 2008 4:08 PM | Report abuse
test
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:08 PM | Report abuse
Correct me if I'm wrong here but isn't having unprotected sex outside of marriage a big deal for GOP types? It never seizes to amaze me how these right wingers keep setting such a poor example of values and morals - the two things that they try to hang their hats on every day - not to mention shove down everyone's throats.
This is a great indicator of how poorly McCain's vetting process was conducted and probably provides some insight into how he would run his administration.
I love how this stuff comes out and it's Obama's (Obama's team's) fault. Give me a break. Next time pick someone who you've known for more than 2 hours and these little hiccups may be avoided.
McCain's recent moves have made me wonder if he is fit for the Senate let alone the Office of the President of the United States.
This was clearly a pick by McCain that was made for personal reasons, not made in the best interest of the country. How someone who just went over the age expectancy for a male in the U.S. could pick someone so unqualified for President is beyond me. It stinks of poor judgement and personal agenda.
The old McCain picks Lieberman for his VP choice despite the NeoCon pressure. This new McCain is operating right out of Rove's playbook.
Posted by: Mike L | September 1, 2008 4:08 PM | Report abuse
On the single most important decision of his campaign, McCain flunked. Not only did he not vet Palin, he barely even met her. It was an entirely political calculation, intended to energize his socially conservative base (Palin is staunchly pro-life even in the case of rape, and she supports a constitutional amendment preventing gay couples from having healthcare benefits); however, conservatives will wonder whether Palin can be a moral leader for America when she cannot even be a moral leader for her own daughter.
How can a one-half term governor of the smallest state in the union, who before that was mayor of a 9000 person town (village? hamlet?), possibly be ready to step in immediately as president?? McCain completely just undercut his "experience" argument.
Posted by: Luke | September 1, 2008 4:08 PM | Report abuse
If Sarah Palin believes in family values it is time for pull of the vice presidential spot and go home to her family. She has a 4 month old with Down's and a pregnant teenage daughter. The last thing her family and especially her daughter needs is to go this process on the national stage. Truth be told this family is in a bit of a crisis and Sarah Palin should be there with them and for them and not running around the country.
Posted by: concerned parent | September 1, 2008 4:07 PM | Report abuse
The more I read what the democrats are saying, the more evident it is that the majority of them are hate mongers and even worse, they are nothing more than a group that could be classified as being DEMON POSSESED. They have no morals and hate anyone that professes to have any morals or religious beliefs. It's really sad. They really do need our prayers. The government is not going to be the downfall of this country, it's the immorality that is going to cause this country's destruction.
Posted by: VLM | September 1, 2008 4:01 PM
=======================================
This is the kind of simple minded dogma that Palin want to teach in our schools! Creationism has no place anywhere but behind closed doors of your home or your church.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:07 PM | Report abuse
Yes, it's George Soros's fault that McCain picked Palin. That's the ticket.
Posted by: Marie Stewart | September 1, 2008 4:07 PM | Report abuse
As a conservative, I feel great shame that McCain selected a woman for VP and now feel even greater shame that he daughter prositutes herself for little or no money at all. What is to become of our beloved country with Women and their retarded children tramping around and shoving potato salad in their ears? God hates sinnners!
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 4:07 PM | Report abuse
Palin could have choose to hide ANYTHING and it should be game over for her candidacy.
Candidates have to deal with the scrutiny, or get out of the race.
The fact that it was a pregnant daughter is horrible. The price the daughter must pay for the sins of the mother.
Bristol made a mistake. Her mother is a very charming sociopath.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:07 PM | Report abuse
(Insert more inane anonymous word-vomiting here) ... All of you, every one of you here, left, right and middle, are all saying such ridiculous things here because nobody can really retaliate and it makes you feel good to 'burn' each other anonymously and feel like you got the last word. What happened to real political discussion in this country. Grow up. If it were up to me, all of you would have to take a testwhen you entered the booth in order to determine if you had the IQ or the moral integrity to deserve to vote in the first place. This is not what our founding fathers envisioned and it is not what so many men and women have died for to preserve over the last 232 years. I will say it again, grow up ... and if you feel the need to respond to this, don't bother, as I am not returning to check on this debauchery.
Posted by: anotherstupidblogger | September 1, 2008 4:07 PM | Report abuse
"who is the baby daddy?"
I just read that he's 25 or 26 yr old student... Apparently they've been dating a while??? Not sure yet.
Posted by: Jessica | September 1, 2008 4:07 PM | Report abuse
What does it matter that Palin’s daughter is pregnant?
1. Palin wants to impose her values and methods for instilling those values on the citizens of the USA;
2. Her daughter’s pregnancy and her own pregnancy at 43 while a governor reflect a lack of discipline, communication and good judgment;
3. Her decision to accept the role of VP nominee indicates a lack of responsibility if she is truly attempting to be a decent parent;
4. If the McCain advisors truly knew about this beforehand, I shudder to think what their version of “homework” would be before deciding whether or not to enter a war with another country or deciding on any major issue. Haven’t we been down that road before . . .
p.s. Wasn’t it convenient that Palin’s daughter always held the baby Trig in her lap and while standing up? A very convenient way to hide her own baby bump from view.
Posted by: Wondering | September 1, 2008 4:07 PM | Report abuse
What is this idea that the "lib's" would love to make this an issue? Nonsense. If I understand correctly, the boyfriend (father-to-be) is 26, the mother-to-be is 17, they have been dating for three years; a 14 year old with a 23 year old boyfriend. She becomes pregnant before the agen of consent, and the right wing or Conservatives praise everyone for wanting to keep the baby and have the parents marry. Sounds like "Ozzie and Harriet" to me. Now, where is the point where "liberals" wish to make an issue of what occurs so often in America? I wouldn't be too happy with my 14 year old dauther dating a 23 year old adult, and would have brought such a situation to an end, but that is just an opinion of a father rather than the opinion of political pursuasion. The Obama team would not - for a moment - care to become derailed from the serious and genuine issues of this campaign - so allow McCain to pander to the right wing and the evangelicals and to the gender bending all he wants, the issues remain the same. Out of Iraq responsibly, take control of energy and the economy, and give our nation the world leadership it long knew and deserved. Thank you.
Posted by: Roman | September 1, 2008 4:07 PM | Report abuse
I am so sorry for the candidate's daughter. She is a teen facing difficult choices and she did not need, or deserve to have her personal issues used for campaign fodder. I do not feel the press should have covered this "story" at all.
Posted by: Vickie Ryan | September 1, 2008 4:06 PM | Report abuse
Sorry, Gov. Palin, but the "sanctity" of marriage in Christian circles would prevent your daughter from being married in the eyes of Jesus and the Lord. Only virgins can marry; anything else is a fraud.
Posted by: Nick | September 1, 2008 4:06 PM | Report abuse
Again, the whole world, including the third world have got to be laughing at how dumb we are in this country. To even consider voting for McCain after this selection for VP is just plain dumb.
Posted by: Jannette | September 1, 2008 4:06 PM | Report abuse
Presidential politics have become soap opera. The discussion about Sara Palin and babies and sex is irrelevant. What is relevant is what this choice says about McCain, i.e. that he is clearly not serious about governing. He only picked Palin to throw red meat to his fundamentalist base. My objection to Palin is that she is a Fundamentalist/Dominionist -- i.e. seeks to foist her beliefs on the America people. Her anti-science 'creationist' views writ large would further erode the waning respect with which the rest of the world views the USA. Science and technology make us competitive in the world -- the Fundamentalists and their anti-science BELIEFS are anathema to what our country has stood for up to now. They are free to believe whatever they wish to believe. But when they seek to use government to foist those beliefs onto the citizenry at large, they run counter to the US Constitution and Declaration of Independence. The founders had experienced state-sponsored religion and wanted none of that here. The fundamentalist Christians who seek to control government now must not be given a toehold. If given the power, they will cause us further free-fall in international marketplaces and economics. They and their views do not belong in government
Posted by: dreaminginthedeepsouth | September 1, 2008 4:05 PM | Report abuse
Im a republic can and I personally dont like Palin as VP nominee. She does seems like a nice person BUT just because she was Governor of Alaska doesnt mean shes fit for VP. But i think McCain did this to get to Hilary/woman vote. how can you trust a person with a COUNTRY after only meeting them twice. I wouldnt trust some of my life time friends to be a heart beat away from Presidency! I think it was a sly move on McCains half. And as a woman, i dont want Palin taking away ANY woman rights. Her kid is keeping the baby and thats great for them. But not all of us have a Governor mom to help us. I dont think she will win over many of Hilarys votes.
Posted by: Denise | September 1, 2008 4:05 PM | Report abuse
"Democrats who use Bristol against Palin are every bit as stupid as the Republicans who say that Obama is a Muslim."
Except, except...liberal Dems do not demonize all Muslims. Many (most? all?) evangelicals, who yesterday viewed Palin as the messiah, abhor premarital sex, comprehensive sex education, and abdication of parental responsibilities, while they sing the praises of the home-schooled, Bible-thumping, all-hetero nuclear family. Since all that played into Palin's selection, one might argue that her family - which has already been trotted out as proof of her fitness for the second-highest office in the land - is fairly fair game.
And then there's the Truth Test. Obama is not a Muslim (not that there's anything wonderful about that). Bristol is preggers (not that there's anything evil about that). And McCain has shot himself in the foot with an NRA-approved wedding-model shotgun.
Posted by: mishi | September 1, 2008 4:05 PM | Report abuse
So the father is 26 and she's 17 and they've been dating for three years? Isn't that statutory rape? Also, what mother in their "right" mind let a 14 year old date a 23 year old man?
The GOP is in TROUBLE!!!
Don't talk to me about family values!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:04 PM | Report abuse
Talk about a shotgun marriage. Poor kids, even if they didn't plan on marrying, they sure don't seem to have much choice now!
Posted by: chilufya | September 1, 2008 4:04 PM | Report abuse
THIS is the problem:
Palin's 2006 AK governor questionnaire:
Question:"Will you support funding for abstinence-until-marriage education instead of for explicit sex-education programs, school-based clinics, and the distribution of contraceptives in schools?"
Palin's response: "Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support"
Posted by: Trouble town | September 1, 2008 4:04 PM | Report abuse
If the good Gov. were such a great leader, why then could she not lead her family to better values and judgement. I have a feeling that they talk the talk but don't walk the walk. A good Christian with moral values would not have tried underhandedly to have someone's livelyhood taken because of a family domestic diffrence.
Posted by: tom tom | September 1, 2008 4:04 PM | Report abuse
Sarah is shameless. She has 5 kids, one just born with birth defects, has a pregnant 17 year old daughter whose personal life will now be spread all over the world. She knows absolutely nothing about foreign policy or national politics. It is unbelievable that McCain would be so stupid to offer her this position. It is unbelievable that she would except. I have read that she is a religious fanatic that believes "Jesus" will guide her. (Wasn't he Geo Bushes foreign policy advisor also?) What a country.
Posted by: Mike | September 1, 2008 4:04 PM | Report abuse
Oh heck... Obama would just have the baby aborted - and if the abortion is botched, he'll just let the baby die in a dirty utility room -
Dems have chosen a real looser again...
rena
Posted by: rena | September 1, 2008 4:04 PM | Report abuse
"Another lib who can't read. McCain knew about the pregnancy before naming Palin as his VP choice. She told him. Read up, it's all over the news in black and white."
THIS
We also don't care, we have much bigger problems as a nation.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:04 PM | Report abuse
us libs aren't concerned with fake family values - its McCains decision making that's the problem. He knew?!?
And what happened to the Strait Talk Express?
Posted by: john | September 1, 2008 4:04 PM | Report abuse
who is the baby daddy?
Posted by: brandon | September 1, 2008 4:04 PM | Report abuse
Which of these things would have better benefitted Bristol Palin: the "abstinence only" education she received, or the condom she didn't?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:03 PM | Report abuse
Wait till they start digging up the dirt on her husband. He needs to shave that nasty thing off his face, btw. He looks like a bum.
Posted by: fear not | September 1, 2008 4:03 PM | Report abuse
I can't believe that there are no pictures or video clips of an expectant Sarah Palin at 8 months. Didn't somebody put together at least one human interest story on Alaska's super mom? "Lets go to the video tape".
Posted by: 8_bit | September 1, 2008 4:03 PM | Report abuse
Obama has been quite consistent in his condemnation of people trying to politicize candidate family members during this campaign. Instead of trying to blame others, he as just said that it is wrong. However, McCain has not shown this kind of discipline.
It makes it surprising that some actually want McCain to be president. McCain seems to love negative campaign issues, as though he is attempting to make this issue a negative campaign issue against Obama. What a hypocrite McCain is.
Posted by: Anthony | September 1, 2008 4:03 PM | Report abuse
Oh, I just love the Moral Right, how they preach and preach and turn up with a 17 y.o preggers daughter or tapping their foot for sex in an airport bathroom. Can't trust 'em. When will you learn.
Posted by: Jesse | September 1, 2008 4:03 PM | Report abuse
I can't believe all these "pro-CHOICErs" are complaining about Palin having a baby and a career and also about her daugher having a baby and choosing to keep it and marry the father. They keep talking about birth control. So you see, they are not really about choice are they? That is unless the choice is sex without babies, whether by using birth control or having an abortion.
Give me a break. We live in a very liberal society that is literally drenched in sexuality. It's everywhere. The schools, the media, the fashion industry, etc. all promote the liberal idea that sex is all about recreation and not about marriage and children and responsibility. (Not that it can't be fun! LOL) A few generations ago most people were virgins when they got married, but pretty much all society was -hold on now- conservative in their ideas about sex.
The Palins probably made every attempt to teach their daughters their beliefs, but it's not easy in this society. I really think that the liberals from the 60's started us down a very slippery slope. Let's not blame the kids, OK???
Posted by: Not4Romney | September 1, 2008 4:03 PM | Report abuse
"Another lib who can't read. McCain knew about the pregnancy before naming Palin as his VP choice. She told him. Read up, it's all over the news in black and white."
How does this make it any better that McCain nominated her, or that she accepted the nomination?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:03 PM | Report abuse
This isn't going to have much effect on die-hard Democratic or Republican voters, but I believe it may on the undecided. I don't believe this makes any of the people involved bad people, but it does highlight the hypocrisy of the people selling the "values vote." It also is messy, and the thought of a White House full of the drama that tends to unfold around this situation is an uneasy one. I think that this is a hit against the Republicans, as it's undermining a lot of the qualities that Palin was chosen to represent and project for the party. And personally, I don't see anything wrong with these sorts of happenings in a family in general, but I wouldn't want to see this mess going on in the White House. There's too much of a mess in this country right now; we don't need personal drama distracting our country's leaders.
Posted by: Stephanie | September 1, 2008 4:03 PM | Report abuse
"Judy, Sarah Palin is the US's answer to Margaret Thatcher! Anyone
who thinks she cannot handle the job or deal briskly and efficiently with
ANY issue, including foreign governments ... well, they haven't met our Sarah
.
As an Alaskan resident as well as a resident of Wasilla, AK, where
Sarah Palin was at one time Mayor ... I can speak with confidence. Governor
Sarah Palin of Alaska is exactly what she portrayed during her introduction
this morning and exactly what our US Government needs. She is ethical to a
fault (if there is such a thing), a refreshing change to the status-quo and
as smart and determined a PERSON (gender really isn't an issue here as far
as I'm concerned) as anyone could ask for at the head of government.
Sarah is no naïve "small town mayor" - she just *started out* there.
Btw, as Mayor of Wasilla, she brought this "small town" through a lot of
GOOD changes and left it at the end of her term having grown to the 4th
largest CITY in Alaska - a lot of growth and a stronger economic base than
ever before.
She has EXECTUTIVE experience *running a government* (something NONE
of the other candidates can actually boast, even John McCain ) as
Governor of Alaska and got there by defeating the *incumbent* Republican
Governor, who was definitely part of the "old school" and who WAS very much
in the pocket of the big oil companies. We in Alaska wanted change - and we
got it in the person of Sarah Palin!
Sarah Palin is everything she looks to be and more. Her approval
rating as Governor of Alaska has been as high as 95% and is currently
leveled out consistently in the upper 80 percentile throughout the state
(and in both parties) - the HIGHEST approval rating of ANY sitting Governor.
Sarah has been turning around corruption in the Legislature of
Alaska - turning things on their ear for that matter; cutting spending in
spite of the increased income the state is currently receiving due to the
high oil prices - she has insisted on putting a huge amount of the
"windfall" into savings for the future rather than spending, spending,
spending - and has insisted from the get-go on what she refers to as
"honest, ethical and transparent governing" - no more closed door meetings
and dealings - the big oil companies thought she would be a pushover and
have learned better to their chagrin.
She understands the "real people" and the economic issues we all
face (Alaskans along with the rest of the country) - she was one of "us" not
long ago. Rather than passing useless "laws" or throwing money at pet
projects, she (most recently) temporarily suspended the state gas tax (on
gasoline at the pumps, fuel oil and natural gas for homes, etc.) and has
ordered checks issued to ALL residents of Alaska this fall in an attempt to
assist with the burden of high fuel costs for the upcoming winter. I could
go on and on, but that's enough for now . She isn't doing these
things to be popular - she is doing it because her constituents are HURTING
financially and she can help.
She became Governor of Alaska by defeating the Incumbent Republican
Governor and doing it *without* the money or the support of the Republican
Party, which was amazing in itself - and she won by a landslide. The "powers
that be" at that time totally underestimated Sarah and learned better the
hard way. She has done exactly what she claimed she was going to do and is
just as popular today as the day she was elected - perhaps more so since
even the Democrats up here seem to like her - she works well with both sides
in the Legislature here.
Sarah "belongs" to us (Alaskans) ... and although we are going to be
terribly sorry to see her leave before she finishes the job she started here
(two years ago) straightening out OUR State ... we understand she is
needed for a bigger purpose and hopefully her Lt. Governor will be able to
fill her shoes here and continue the job.
As for worrying about what would happen if McCain were to die or
step down or whatever ... Theta, up here in AK we've only been wondering how
long we would be able to KEEP Sarah in Alaska and have seen her as our first
woman President of the USA from the start. It's always been a matter of
whether she would wait until the end of her TWO terms as Governor (no doubt
at ALL that she would be re-elected if she ran for a second term at the end
of her current term) ... or end up in Washington sooner. She could do the
job TODAY.
Personally, I feel a lot better about McCain now that I know he has
someone as savvy, as strong, as ethical and as steady as Sarah at his back.
She will be an excellent Vice President ... and my guess is will be our US
Republican Presidential candidate in four years - AND by then the country
will KNOW here - will love and respect her as we do here - and she'll win by
as much of a landslide as she did here in Alaska. I only wonder if McCain
has a clue what he is unleashing on the US of A . She is going to be a
fresh wind, but also a strong wind.
Is that enough of an endorsement? If not, I'll add this ... Jerry
and I have for many years felt the best "vote" was to vote for the lesser of
two "evils" and hope they didn't do too much damage. Two years ago during
our State Governor's race was the first time EVER that we actually asked for
not just a little sign to put in our yard showing our support of our
candidate (something we've never felt the desire to do at all before) - we
asked for a full 4' x 8' "SARAH PALIN FOR GOVERNOR!" sign and were proud to
have it. She hasn't let us or Alaska down. She will do the same for the USA
if given the opportunity.
Feel free to pass this on to anyone who may be interested (and spam
those who aren't!).
Posted by: More Echoes of Bill | September 1, 2008 4:03 PM | Report abuse
Bush should be so disappointed. What happened to abstinence? Maybe next time they should talk about condoms, and distribute condoms in Africa to avoid Aids, and not conditioning the money they send to spread abstinence only.
If Sarah Palin doesn't know what is going inside her own home, how is she going to read the intentions of foreign leaders?
Posted by: Fernando F. | September 1, 2008 4:02 PM | Report abuse
Anyone with a crystal clean personal (and family) record eligible to run for political office, please raise your hand. No, not you...you had an F on an English term paper. No, not you...your mother dressed you in tacky plaid shorts. No, not you...your shoes don't match. See how stupid this can be??? Oh, and no, not you...you don't have enough command of the English language to spell correctly.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:02 PM | Report abuse
They have been dating for 3 years - she is 17 - even I can do the math. What kind of parents would allow a 14 year old to date a 23 year old? I am shocked that this person could ever be chosen as a vice presidential candidate, let alone be the governor of a state!
Posted by: Chris A | September 1, 2008 4:02 PM | Report abuse
Sounds like Palin's daughter was raped. She is after all a minor and the father is 26. That is rape. Also, what good parent allows their 14 year old to date a 23 year old (since the two have dated for 3 years)?
I can't vote for a 72 year old to become President since the 44 year old has little experience in public administration and can't run the family safely and work at the same time.
Posted by: SC Republican | September 1, 2008 4:02 PM | Report abuse
Quote "Why did her son suddenly enlist in the Army. Rumor has it that he had to or do some time for illegial activities. Any truth to this? This kid had a big hockey career going and was supposed to go to college and then WHAMO, in the Army."
I don't know, but until you can prove anything, shut the ---- up.
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 4:02 PM | Report abuse
Eeeeeeeeeeeee! Yeil's turn to see if I can make Sarah's kids laugh!
Yeil's funny video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuMMfgWhm3g
Gunalchéesh áyá x’axwdataaní
Proud Obama/Biden Supporter
Posted by: Yeil's Daughter | September 1, 2008 4:02 PM | Report abuse
Is anyone not disturbed that private information is being broken by a left-wing website funded by George Soros. This is becoming regular behaviour for the left. I understand that Bush/Rove won using these tactics but do we really want to copy them. I have been a Democrat my whole life and even know the Obamas personally but I am getting disgusted by the methods that they used to take down Hillary and now are using on McCain.
I would ask yourself how well do you really know Obama? Are you so certain that he is moral in his behaviour? I don't know much about his private life but I as a Hyde Parker know that many of the stories that he tells aren't true. I only wonder how you will feel when the right wing press starts to uncover these
Posted by: Michael in Chicago | September 1, 2008 4:02 PM | Report abuse
Does anyone really think Palin is fit for the presidency? She will be and would be a total puppet for the neocons. Just like "awol" is under "go f**k yourself" cheney.
Posted by: Mark | September 1, 2008 4:01 PM | Report abuse
These rumors were being circulated in Alaska by Republicans -- including, rumors say, the Republican state senate leader who is a vicious political (and personal?) enemy of Palin's. They have been making the rounds on wingnut radio, and on wingnut forums for a long time.
McCain has again shown, as with his vote to pre-emptively invade Iraq, that he does not have the ability to make wise decisions and just like Bush he shoots from the hip instead of analyzing a given situation before hand.
Posted by: Paige Palmer | September 1, 2008 4:01 PM | Report abuse
The more I read what the democrats are saying, the more evident it is that the majority of them are hate mongers and even worse, they are nothing more than a group that could be classified as being DEMON POSSESED. They have no morals and hate anyone that professes to have any morals or religious beliefs. It's really sad. They really do need our prayers. The government is not going to be the downfall of this country, it's the immorality that is going to cause this country's destruction.
As far as the young lady getting pregnant, it only proves she is human like every person on this earth. Everybody makes many mistakes during their lifetime. There was only one person that ever walked on this earth that lived a perfect life.
Posted by: VLM | September 1, 2008 4:01 PM | Report abuse
The intolerant, arch conservatism Sarah Palin represents has been undermined not by a sniping press, liberal bloggers or campaign dirty tricks, but by HER OWN DAUGHTER. While ordinarily families ought to be off limits in campaigns, it is hardly possible when "family values" is one of the issues the candidate's party harps on most frequently.
The entire circus surrounding Sarah Palin shows only one thing clearly--she was a very poor choice for a running mate for John McCain. Since this decision was McCain's to make, what does it say about his capacity to come to the right conclusion when faced with judgment calls? What if the issue at hand had been something really serious, such as whether to send US troops to the Republic of Georgia and thus stir up (another) major land war in Asia?
McCain didn't earn the nickname Senator Hothead by using common sense.
Posted by: Pragmatus | September 1, 2008 4:00 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "They Should be mad at John Mccain for not properly veting her,and also mad at Palin for not rejecting the nomination, but if your.."
Another lib who can't read. McCain knew about the pregnancy before naming Palin as his VP choice. She told him. Read up, it's all over the news in black and white.
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 4:00 PM | Report abuse
Why did her son suddenly enlist in the Army. Rumor has it that he had to or do some time for illegial activities. Any truth to this? This kid had a big hockey career going and was supposed to go to college and then WHAMO, in the Army.
Posted by: Another question | September 1, 2008 4:00 PM | Report abuse
I had to laugh out loud at the "clever" leftists who challenge Governor Palin's judgment in accepting the VP ticket with a pregnant 17 year old. Why? Because I can't imagine better healthcare, better security, better everything they'll all get now within the protective shroud of a U.S. presidential campaign (to say nothing of the benefits if the GOP actually wins).
I'm an Obama supporter and I must advise a lot of the Democratic posters here would be better off finding another hobby. With 60+ days to go and the race dead even, your incessant emotional and baseless rants are doing our cause no good for any swing votes out there.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 4:00 PM | Report abuse
Some anonymous GOP operative suggests that Obama and his people propagated the rumors and that is enough for the media to report it.
Obama has been trying to get the media to focus on issues and not the "celebrity" smears, the muslim smears, the unpatriotic smears, etc etc etc pushed by the GOP. This comes out and Obama is the root of all smearing??? Unbelievable.
Liberal media my behind.
Posted by: birdman | September 1, 2008 4:00 PM | Report abuse
I thought marriage was sacred. Why is she allowed to get married?
Posted by: DeadBaby | September 1, 2008 4:00 PM | Report abuse
Message to Sarah Palin: withdraw your candidacy. You look like you're putting political ambition above family matters. This is serious, Sarah. I'm sure you love your daughter very much. Be there for her. A 17-year-old needs her mother, especially at a time like this. Forget the campaign. It's not that important.
McCain (McGoo), you've done it again. How do you spell E-A-G-L-E-T-O-N?
Posted by: Jim Bob from GA | September 1, 2008 4:00 PM | Report abuse
And this is our business because...?
Posted by: 4Hillary1 | September 1, 2008 4:00 PM | Report abuse
A rather important point that the media has thus far missed:
It is impossible that the McCain vetting team knew about this in advance.
a) McCain originally wanted to choose Lieberman, Pawlenty or Ridge. He was forced to reject these choices because the *evangelical* faction would not accept someone who did not meet their criteria for their set of values.
b) Do you therefore mean to say that, in attempting to select someone who would satisfy these values voters, the McCain team would *knowingly* select someone who has a teenage daughter who is illegitimately pregnant? Utterly contradictory and, if known, would have defeated the purpose of the choice.
c) Therefore, we also now have the issue of the McCain camp covering up its incomplete vetting by stating that they knew what they obviously did not know in the first place.
Posted by: Marie Stewart | September 1, 2008 4:00 PM | Report abuse
The pregnancy of Palin's daughter should have no influence on assessing her as a person who is qualified to be a heartbeat away from the presidency.
In my personal opinion there are so many overwhelming weaknesses with Palin's experience and character, that her opponents should be gentle with her so they do not appear to be humiliating her.
If nothing else, her voice is so amazingly annoying that many people will not want to listen to it for four years.
Posted by: Paula | September 1, 2008 4:00 PM | Report abuse
If a mother is so unclear about her family's priorities, I do not call that management ability. Our country cannot survive another inept manager with reactionary views.
Posted by: Iris | September 1, 2008 4:00 PM | Report abuse
Just say yes to a condom.
Posted by: Ira | September 1, 2008 3:59 PM | Report abuse
DemocratWoman you sin like that in my church we put the fear of God in you. You women need to keep your mouths shut and just do what you're told. Let the men do the talking around here! McCain/Palin 08
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 3:59 PM | Report abuse
I think a lot of people are missing the real issue. The real issue is not that Palin's daughter got pregnant out of wedlock. That little to nothing to do with Gov. Palin, because it shows bad judgement on her daughter's part. Her daughter is old enough to be making her own decisions and her mom doesn't have complete control.
The real issue is that Palin is running for VP right as her daughter is going through this crisis, exposing her daughter to even more stress and ridicule in an already stressful situation!!!!! And that IS a real issue that should be addressed that has nothing to do with her daughter's life and all to do with Palin's judgement.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:59 PM | Report abuse
Someone wrote: "This fetal intrigue only makes Palin look more human." Ha,Ha,...
I think it only make her look like an absentee mother. I do appreciate the drama that Palin and family bring.
I wonder what we will find out tomorrow about her.
Posted by: Juice | September 1, 2008 3:59 PM | Report abuse
MY MY MY, WHAT A TANGLED WEB WE WEAVE. ALL I HAVE TO SAY IS, WHAT IF OBAMA HAD A 17-YR-OLD PREGNANT DAUGHTER???? THE MEDIA AND EVERYONE ELSE WOULD HAVE A FIELD DAY WITH THIS. YES, I AM PLAYING THE RACE CARD RIGHT NOW.BECAUSE FOR SOME BITTER HILARY SUPPORTERS AND OTHER SUPPORTERS WHO WOULD ABSOLUTELY NOT VOTE FOR A BLACK MAN, THIS WOULD BE THE PERFECT REASON TO SAY, OBAMA IS NOT FIT TO RUN THE COUNTRY, HE CAN'T EVEN RUN HIS OWN HOUSE HOLD. BUT BECAUSE SHE IS A WHITE WOMAN SHE IS GETTING A TOTAL PASS ON THE SCRUTINANY THAT COMES WITH BEING A "TYPICAL STATISTIC" (OUT OF WED MOTHERHOOD). THIS OTHERWISE WOULDN'T BE ANY CONCERN, YOUNG PEOPLE MAKE MISTAKES, THAT IS A FACT OF LIFE, BUT I KNOW AND YOU KNOW HOW PEOPLE WOULD REACT IF THE SHOE WAS ON OBAMA'S FOOT.
Posted by: Mrs C in LA | September 1, 2008 3:59 PM | Report abuse
"I am a special education teacher and work with high needs students (Autism, Downs etc..) Since when does having a disability make you less of a person or a burden?"
Posted by: Teach | September 1, 2008 3:32 PM
Oh I am glad my 20 yr old autistic son had me for a teacher instead of YOU! You ask since when does having a disability make you less of a person- It does not! and the only one on here to suggest so has been YOU!
Secondly, in so far as being a "burden" the honest answer is yes, special needs children are more needy than children without a disability. They are a bigger financial burden on parents than children without a disability. In the case of Autism, the therapies needed are NOT COVERED BY INSURANCE in most cases, leaving the parent to pay the entire expense out of pocket. That is just a fact I deal with every day as the parent of a special needs child. Does that mean they are not as good as a child without a disability, Of course not! It simply means they need more of their PARENTS time, effort, incomes and energy in order to give them the best possible outcomes in life. And honestly, I could not imagine raising my son and doing it as well as I have, while simultaneously running a country. The outcome for either or both would not be up to my standards, and that would be unacceptable. But it appears Sarah Palin wonder mom is here to our rescue. She will tell all of us moms how we should get a high paying job and leave the raising of our children in the capable hands of daycare workers like yourself :) Wow, I can't wait for that day!
What progress we women are making!
Posted by: Karin | September 1, 2008 3:59 PM | Report abuse
The angry right doesn't get that if Sarah Palin from day one told the truth about Bristol this column wouldn't exist.
How dumb that the McCain campaign didn't use Bristol's pregnancy as another way to prove that Sarah is THE American every-mother.
I'm afraid that we have only seen the tip of the iceberg of a giant half-truth.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:59 PM | Report abuse
gee... did not know that ALASKAN read the Post... good for you! OF COURSE THE FATHER WILL MARRY BRISTOL NOW THAT SHE'S A CELEBRITY! SAME OLD WHITE TRASH STUFF!!!
Posted by: 66 hater | September 1, 2008 3:59 PM | Report abuse
"I heard on Obama's speech that he will fix the oil crisis in "ten years". Is he already thinking of staying in office more than the 8 years stablished by the constitution. Are we dealing here with another Hugo Chavez, or Fidel Castro?"
MORON! MORON ALERT, MORON ALERT!
You fool, when he says 10 years he means that the plans and ideas and laws that he puts into effect when he wins will take 10 years to complete. When his term is up his laws, ideas, and plans dont go with him out the door.
Freaking redneck republicans
get a clue
Posted by: THE REAL WORD | September 1, 2008 3:58 PM | Report abuse
Don't blame democrates, blame republican who picked reckless mom as VP.
Posted by: anzan | September 1, 2008 3:58 PM | Report abuse
"Just read on CNN... The father is a 26 year old pharmacy student at Univ of Alaska. The two have been dating for the past 3 years."
So she was dating a 23 yer old guy when she was 13? Pedophilia!!!
Where did they fish that guy out and how much did he get?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:58 PM | Report abuse
I am pumped that Palin handled it the way she did. This candidate is real. She will be the next VP in a complete and total convincing victory over Obama and Biden.
Posted by: Chance McClain | September 1, 2008 3:58 PM | Report abuse
"Until Obama stands up and gives a speech telling bloggers and the media to grow up, back off, and focus on the issues he has no credibility."
Since McCain is such a leader, why not have him go first? The number of blogs spewing lies, racist images and hate about Obama are legion. Of course John does not know about that new fangled thing called the Internet so he can claim ignorance, eh?
Posted by: Flannelbowtie | September 1, 2008 3:58 PM | Report abuse
What a non-issue. From the libs, who froth at the mouth over Hillary Clinton, who is one of the worst politicians around and a PROVEN habitual liar. Palin has more accomplishments in a short time than Obama or Hillary Clinton.
Do I detect a double standard here??
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 3:58 PM | Report abuse
Perhaps a great many of the really nasty posts on here should be taken with a grain of salt.
Perhaps they are being contributed by a fifth-column faction whose agenda is to create division and polarization in
American society.
These people don't want a unified American nation, no matter who happens to be President.
Not content with merely promoting anti-American sentiment abroad, these agitators want Americans to hate each other, to pit themselves against each other along demographic lines.
There is no peasantry in the US after the Marxist model, so they agitate using race, religion, gender....now they hope they can pit "liberals" and "conservatives" against each other.
It must be frustrating for these agitators who thought that they could Balkanize the US---they're way behind schedule.
Throughout the world, unscrupulous speculators deliberately use cats paws to foment polarization and chaos in order to profit from changes in financial markets.
Those agitating in the interests of for totalitarianism do the same thing, hoping that citizens will be willing to permit infringements upon their privacy and freedom in the interest of "law and order."
Individual Americans should resist their coercive manipulation by refusing to react categorically to taunting. Many times subversives poke and prod wildly in the hope of locating the emotional and ideological bulls-eye of a targeted population.
It is always good to remember that this is to remember that this is an anonymous forum, and people can post here from anywhere in the world---not to mention from atop an expensive but increasingly rickety fifth column.
.
Posted by: agrarian | September 1, 2008 3:58 PM | Report abuse
Conservatives should not be mad at the Daily Kos or any network for reporting facts! They Should be mad at John Mccain for not properly veting her,and also mad at Palin for not rejecting the nomination, but if your
Posted by: Jamaal | September 1, 2008 3:58 PM | Report abuse
I find these posts both vicious and judgmental in regard to this issue. To start with, why do we, as the general public, think that we are ENTITLED to know every personal detail of a candidate's (or in this case, her daughter's) life? One would assume that certain things are private, and in this case, should be a concern only to Bristol, the baby's father, and the family members. I think she should be commended for taking responsibility for her actions..a concept that Democrats fail to understand--SELF RESPSONSIBILTY! "(which translates into "no government handouts" for bad personal decisions!)
Now, in regard to this being all about Sarah's parenting skills...well, I don't know about most of you who are being so critical of her, and blaming her for Bristol's condition, but I'm certain that if all of us remember back to our teenage years, we can surely recall how the hormones were raging, and it didn't matter if our parents told us to "just say no" or preached to us of abstinence, or any other parental input we received regarding sex, if we were going to do it, we did it!!! I fail to see this as Sarah's bad parenting, and more about a normal, typical, teenage girl who made a dumb choice and ends up in a situation that is, unfortunately, not uncommon in her peer group.
People, this is an election, not high school politics! Do you have to be so darn negative?? I have to ask, if this nominee were a father of a teenage girl who is pregnant, would he have to endure so much condemnation in regard to his parenting skills, and his lack of attention to his small children while campaigning...I dare say not! But because this is a highly intelligent, accomplished woman seeking this position, the rules are different, and in one post, is even called a "monster"! Alas, some things never change....
posted by a former Dem.
Posted by: Cate | September 1, 2008 3:57 PM | Report abuse
Someone wrote: "This fetal intrigue only makes Palin look more human." Ha,Ha,...
I think it only make her look like an absentee mother. I do appreciate the drama that Palin and family bring.
I wonder what we will find out tomorrow about her. This is better than a movie.
Posted by: Juice | September 1, 2008 3:57 PM | Report abuse
The Palins are replenishing the earth. So is Rielle Hunter, John Edwards' girlfriend!
They are making more souls for heaven. They are creating new baby Christians.
Praise His holy name!
Posted by: Roberto | September 1, 2008 3:57 PM | Report abuse
McCain's idiotic choice for VP now appears certain to be the "white trash gift that keeps on giving". A huge benefit of Miss Alaska runner-up Sarah Palin's messy personal life will be that it brings into sharp focus the endlessly hypocritical nature of Republicans and "family values" conservatives. If it turned out her five children are from five different fathers they'd find a way to praise her willingness to accept others, just as Jesus did.
Posted by: Steve Bonser | September 1, 2008 3:57 PM | Report abuse
As a pro-life democrat I hope this will spark a heated debate on abortion and that teenage pregnancies should be reduced, in order to bring the abortion rate down. Most liberal democratic countries in Europe have lower rates of abortion than the US! Mostly because teenage pregancies are low.
This should definitely persuade pro-life voters to vote for Obama.
Posted by: Elizabeth | September 1, 2008 3:57 PM | Report abuse
God love Barack Obama and his call to "Back Off!" on this story. All the more so for saying so after having weathered an ENORMOUS amount of smear and personal attack on himself and his family by rightwing pundits and bloggers. He continues to demonstrate that he wants to have this election be about issues and qualifiactions.
The ONLY way this Bristol Palin pregnancy story matters is if it contributes to a pattern of Sarah Palin's for lying and otherwise abusing the power of her office for family matters. If she really wants to put the "she's Trig's grandma" speculation behind her, she could take a genetics test (hey, Edwards was willing to).
But since McCain strategically chose a VP candidate about which little is known (as part of an attempt to cast her as both Washington outsider and untouched by Bush/Cheney scandal), his campaign must now weather the excrutiating process of vetting by the public.
And while the campaign seems to have anticipated this and Palin seems to have agreed to it, I wonder how much Bristol was consulted. However this plays out, my heart goes out to her. It's hard enough being an unwed pregnant teenager without feeling that you compromised let alone sank your mother's national political career in the process.
Posted by: Jonny | September 1, 2008 3:57 PM | Report abuse
I'm appalled by these comments. Her daughter's decision should not be used to tear down Palin. By attempting to be honest with America, everyone now seems to think that Palin is a terrible hypocrit that can't take care of her children and is using her daughter's mistake as a political stepping stone. Do you honestly think that Sarah didn't sit down and thoroughly speak with Bristol about whether or not to make this puclic? Do you honestly believe that someone would just stand up and say 'by the way my daughter is pregnant and I hope she doesn't care I told the whole world' without talking to her about it?
If I were to turn up pregnant, it shouldn't be taken as my mother's fault. It would be mine and only mine. Not a fault of my teaching or 'indoctrination'. It was Bristol's personal decision/mistake and it should only be viewed as this. I applaud her for her decision to bring the child full-term and raise it in a two-parent home with its father.
And why does everyone seem to think that if this happened to Obama's family it would be taken so differently? Something I've learned about politics is that assumptions of people's actions and opinions are more damaging than the actual actions and opinions. Please don't assume that pro-lifers would be raving if Obama's daughter turned up pregnant. You don't know what would be said and we all know what assuming does. Grow up, stop pointing fingers and leave people to tend to their own personal business. I'm offended to know that people have such detailed and inaccurate stereotypes for either side of the aisle. I hope that when my generation is in office, we can overcome this bigotry.
At least now the truth is out there and the over-zealous media won't have to "get that scoop".
By the way, I'm a pro-life, conservative, Christian Republican. I'm eighteen and more conservative than my parents. Don't make assumptions.
Posted by: Teenager | September 1, 2008 3:57 PM | Report abuse
If this is really off limits, isn't it idiotic to have let the Grand Old Party keep this under wraps?
Posted by: Freeus | September 1, 2008 3:56 PM | Report abuse
To those going after Obama's mom. Obama's mom was NOT running for office or shoving any right wing extremist views down anyone's throat. Here is how things are handled when a Democrat leader's kid gets in trouble: It is all over the news and pundits have a field day. Here is how it is when Republican leader's kids get in trouble: The Republicans and their pundits tell everyone: 'is a private, familly matter'
Check it out!
As for Palin. In the end she will probably be tossed off the team the way Bush tossed his friend Harriet Meirs out, she will say it is because she it is more neccesary raising kids.
She is a far right social conservative but you would think now that reality hit her about her pregnant kid and her sudden (after 5 months of pregnancy!) shotgun wedding, that Palin would mature a little and not live in that kind of ideological la la land now that it is exposed in the cold light of day.
Posted by: fjorhtur | September 1, 2008 3:56 PM | Report abuse
Anyone else notice the brown shirts and hitler youth staying behing the Palin family in the photograph above. What does this family have planned for America? :o
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 3:56 PM | Report abuse
I do not think I would take CNN as gospel with the bias news they report. I will wait for an official word.
Posted by: Tamara Lillie | September 1, 2008 3:56 PM | Report abuse
Here we have another mess of contradiction from McCain and/or his campaign people.
To rebut the rumor that the DS child's mother is Palin's daughter, Palin says her 17 year old unmarried daughter is pregnant.
The official announcement of the pregnancy carefully avoids any assertion that the daughter did anything wrong. But, this is an Evangelical Christian family that believes that abstinence is God's way to avoid pregnancy.
The Palin's are hypocrites and liars.
The McCain campaign is trying to change the subject by saying stories about a candidate's personal life are off-limits. It is not only too late to say that but it is one big pile of bull patties.
Senator Obama's personal life has been examined by the media in excruciating detail. Republicans cheered it on. Looking closely at McCain's and Palin's personal life is fair game.
Posted by: Peter | September 1, 2008 3:56 PM | Report abuse
Let He/She who is without sin cast the first stone. Who of us hasn't done something wrong? You cuss, you lie, you cheat on your taxes, you run your mouth off more than you know you should. It is not "democrat" like to cast stones like this. And I am ashamed that you would talk like this about any fellow human being. And personally, I know you Obama supporters, like myself, know that talking so crassly about someone is not a part of the democratic philosophy. So, knock it off and use your education, albeit limited, to think through your arguments.
Posted by: DemocratWoman | September 1, 2008 3:56 PM | Report abuse
Let's look at that again, shall we?
->A rather important point that the media has thus far missed:
It is impossible that the McCain vetting team knew about this in advance.
a) McCain originally wanted to choose Lieberman, Pawlenty or Ridge. He was forced to reject these choices because the *evangelical* faction would not accept someone who did not meet their criteria for their set of values.
b) Do you therefore mean to say that, in attempting to select someone who would satisfy these values voters, the McCain team would *knowingly* select someone who has a teenage daughter who is illegitimately pregnant? Utterly contradictory and, if known, would have defeated the purpose of the choice.
c) Therefore, we also now have the issue of the McCain camp covering up its incomplete vetting by stating that they knew what they obviously did not know in the first place."
Hmmm...and the error there is?
Posted by: Marie Stewart | September 1, 2008 3:56 PM | Report abuse
obama's parents were not married, and dosen't this make obama's children now fair game to go after? really, who cares about these issues, talk policy!!!!!
Posted by: bigblue | September 1, 2008 3:55 PM | Report abuse
I'm sure the Palin's maids, nannies and childcare specialists are well-paid and quite competent.
Breed on, ye noble Republicans, your gene pool is leaking!
Posted by: fear not | September 1, 2008 3:55 PM | Report abuse
I have to wonder, without sounding too partisan, what this means for "feminism" and the "women's vote." The girl's pregancy is "relevant" only if one presumes (i) Palin should be devoted to child care, not politics and (ii) that is so because her proper place is in the home, not the office. Pro-choice feminists will not hesitate to adopt this hypocritical position, at least until November 4. The bigger question, however, is what mainstream women will think. If they go against Palin here, I think the "glass ceiling" will be permanent -- many working women have these types of conflicts. So, it's game time, American women. Palin is more qualified to do the job than Obama, and thus can only be disqualified on dubious grounds -- by women. What will the outcome be?
Posted by: Game Time | September 1, 2008 3:55 PM | Report abuse
You can just imagine the howls that would be coming from the Republicans if the daughter of a Democratic nominee was pregnant and unmarried at 17! They would be talking about the lack of family values among Democrats, etc. The Republican spin meisters have been going at full tilt to tout how Pallin has more "executive" experience then Obama and Biden as Governer and "commander" of the Alaskan national guard. Lets see how they try to spin this one! Slogan FAMILY VALUES, THE EARLIER, THE MORE (if white and christian), THE BETTER!
Posted by: Michael R | September 1, 2008 3:55 PM | Report abuse
Just read on CNN... The father is a 26 year old pharmacy student at Univ of Alaska. The two have been dating for the past 3 years.
Posted by: butterfly | September 1, 2008 3:55 PM | Report abuse
RE: "" Posted by: Susan | September 1, 2008 3:44 PM
"Judy, Sarah Palin is the US's answer to Margaret Thatcher! Anyone
who thinks she cannot handle the job or deal briskly and efficiently with
ANY issue, including foreign governments ... well, they haven't met our Sarah""
- Susan, Margaret Thatcher all but destroyed the UK, I lived through it. In 1979, I was reading Shakespeare at home with a book that the school had given me. By 1984 I was sharing a book amongst 4 other children and giving it back at the end of the lesson. My parents were locking there doors for the first time at night and money, not social responsibility was now on people minds.
If Thatcher is what you want Palin to be then you are either misguided or have no love of your country.
Posted by: brook | September 1, 2008 3:55 PM | Report abuse
Where are the Republican morals?? Doesn't she know what abstance? We always teach our children how and what to do.. if you have the correct morals and knowledge to do so, I'm thinking the Palin's doesn't. I can't see her being the Gov. no Alaska, no less being VP of the USA. She's a wreck waiting to happen!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:55 PM | Report abuse
The liberal media, the conservative media- its all ridiculous at this point. Those people saying that Palin has more executive experience than Obama are spewing nothing but sound bites and those harping on the pregnancy are digging for things that needn't be dug up.
The truth is this (and anyone who refutes it needs to get their head checked): McCain chose Palin for political purposes ONLY. He wants to win the election more than he wants to govern this country. He has made a mockery of the VP pick and has gone against everything he said weeks ago about the importance of such a decision. It sickens me to think that he has disgraced this campaign in such an obvious way. There is NO WAY i want Palin to meet with foreign leaders about anything. America will look weak throughout the world and (we) will be laughed at. It is so disheartening to see a man so hellbent on being seen as a reformer more than he wants to be seen as a leader.
I was for McCain and am now for Obama. He has withstood the test and has risen above all GOP attacks. I am tired of all of distractions and want nothing more than to see Obama and Biden in the White House!
Posted by: For McCain, now against McCain | September 1, 2008 3:55 PM | Report abuse
Boy oh BOY ! You money grubbing republicans will come up with anything to keep that money in your checking accounts and the diamonds on your pathetic little bodys!
TAX EM BAMA TAX EM!
TAX EM TO HIGH HELL!
You are the same scum bags who jump all over brittney spears sister for being pregnant because she is on a tv show, now you want the person who could be president when McCain finaly goes insane and or dies to have a teenage pregnant daughter.... TWO FACED LOSER REPUBLICANS.... MAKE ME SICK.
Posted by: The real word | September 1, 2008 3:55 PM | Report abuse
Doesn't the right wing frown upon pre-marital sex? OOOPS - well only if involves someone OTHER than who they want to push their agenda. Now in this case their stand will be - how great that she is keeping the baby! And the conservatives say the liberals are masters of the spin?
Posted by: Chris Anderson | September 1, 2008 3:54 PM | Report abuse
We have no control over the political outcome of the election. When will people realize that? Are Americans really that stupid?Unfortunately I think so. You can't tell me that out of the entire US population, Obama and McCain are the two most qualified and best options for president. Our two party system doesn't work and is controlled by too many outside factors other that the average voter. No wonder Europeans laugh at us. I still believe we are the greatest country on this planet, but we're pathetically slipping from are fore-fathers intentions fast. It's a shame.
Posted by: Tom C | September 1, 2008 3:54 PM | Report abuse
I heard on Obama's speech that he will fix the oil crisis in "ten years". Is he already thinking of staying in office more than the 8 years stablished by the constitution. Are we dealing here with another Hugo Chavez, or Fidel Castro?
Posted by: Miriamsofi | September 1, 2008 3:54 PM | Report abuse
To everyone out there, you are not Democrat or Republican, Red, Blue or Green, you are humans, there are no perfect candidates and you will never see one, inform yourself, verify the sources of the information and then make an informed judgment, you have time to do that, and then vote for the ticket you think is closer to what you would like to see families and individuals in this country benefit over the next 4 to 8 years. This is a great country.
Posted by: Joe from Montgomery County Maryland | September 1, 2008 3:54 PM | Report abuse
As a working mother I support Sarah Palin - however I am disturbed that she is putting her career above her family - first, she has a disabled child and hands it off to others to raise, and second, her daughter gets pregnant - clearly she is needed at home and simply does not have the bandwidth to be the VP. I think all of us working parents must be honest about what we can an d should take on....it is not a question of male/female. We have to set priorities and it is glaringly obvious Sarah Palin should reassess hers and turn her attention to her family, at least for now.
Bad choice JM....seems like your decision process is as flawed as Palin's. I am disappointed.
Posted by: HPG | September 1, 2008 3:54 PM | Report abuse
I think a lot of people are missing the real issue. The real issue is not that Palin's daughter got pregnant out of wedlock. That little to nothing to do with Gov. Palin, because it shows bad judgement on her daughter's part. Her daughter is old enough to be making her own decisions and her mom doesn't have complete control.
The real issue is that Palin is running for VP right as her daughter is going through this crisis, exposing her daughter to even more stress and ridicule in an already stressful situation!!!!! And that IS a real issue that should be addressed that has nothing to do with her daughter's life and all to do with Palin's judgement.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:54 PM | Report abuse
Many questions remain regarding the true paternity and maternity of Trig.
Worse than making a 17 year old girl have a baby is making her get married at 17. Have these people all lost their minds?
Posted by: Secular Humanist | September 1, 2008 3:54 PM | Report abuse
As a pastor of my local church and long term conservative, I am just distgusted by this. Someone needs to treat that dirty little tramp a lesson. Sex out of wedlock makes baby jesus cry. :(
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 3:54 PM | Report abuse
I wonder if all the people attacking Palin would be attacking Hillary if it were publicly revealed that Chelsea has herpes or gonnorhea.....
I doubt.
This is nothing more than partisan political theatre. People see what they want to see and believe what they want to believe because they are blind to reason, objectivity, and compassion by their ideology.
Posted by: Ted Brogan | September 1, 2008 3:54 PM | Report abuse
Sarah Palin will have the Senators backing
http://www.alabd3.com/vb/index.php
Posted by: ahmad | September 1, 2008 3:53 PM | Report abuse
Marie Stewart's rationalizing non-sequiturs are just that--nonsensical. She misses completely that McCain's team knew about the pregnancy and, because true conservatives believe it's no one's business, they acted on that belief. Seems like all the hate here is coming from the opportunistic socialist left.
Ms. Stewart sadly forgot the first rule of analyzing someone else's motives: Walk a mile in the other person's shoes first to understand, not only their behavior, but how they see the world. Clearly, they don't see the world as the jaded cynic you are, Marie.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:53 PM | Report abuse
You know, what makes this all the more pathetic is that McCain passed on Romney because he didn't think all the smug fundies could handle a member of the LDS church as his running mate.
Posted by: Pete Olsen | September 1, 2008 3:53 PM | Report abuse
So Bristol was away from school for 5 months with Mono, and got pregnant during that time? Is that the story now?
Posted by: saint thomas | September 1, 2008 3:53 PM | Report abuse
999dfr:
I respect your opinion. Just didn't buy his sweeping claim that "beyond Colonel ... it's all politics." Sounds like he's bitter that he got passed over. I know plenty in the "beyond colonel" officer ranks who are supremely talented and rose in the ranks the old-fashioned way: competence.
Posted by: wingedwheel | September 1, 2008 3:53 PM | Report abuse
Back off Dems.
Obviously this is another immaculate conception.
Posted by: JonJon | September 1, 2008 3:53 PM | Report abuse
Just read on CNN... The father is a 26 year old pharmacy student at Univ of Alaska. The two have been dating for the past 3 years.
Posted by: Yup | September 1, 2008 3:53 PM | Report abuse
"It's obvious from the liberal posts here that McCain made the perfect choice for VP. Their minds just do not know how to process the fact that the REPUBLICANS were the ones to put a woman on the ticket."
THIS
Posted by: Agree | September 1, 2008 3:52 PM | Report abuse
It just makes the right look like hypocrites
Posted by: noelle | September 1, 2008 3:52 PM | Report abuse
I guess everyone....liberals and conservatives.....should remember that Ronald Reagan's wife, Nancy, was pregnant when they were married in the 1950's. And Barack Obama's mother was pregnant, with him, when she married his father in the 1960's. This is obviously nothing new and it seems to occur across party lines!
Posted by: maureen rehg | September 1, 2008 3:52 PM | Report abuse
While not having the abortion can be seen as admirable, this is actually caused by not having the condom.
Leave the daughter alone though, at best the issue is teaching abstinence vs birth control, and the consequences, good or bad. I wish her well.
Posted by: debreuil | September 1, 2008 3:52 PM | Report abuse
Unbelievable hypocrisy. This pregnancy would be unacceptable to me as a voter no matter which political party Palin was with. However, knowing the moral standards of the conservatives and the limits they seek on women's rights, this reeks. "Do as I say, not as I do". And to make this into a Pro-life debate is vile. Her daughter should have abstained from sex, should have received sex education, been given the opportunity to use birth control, and be married first. Palin and her husband need to focus on being parents and not political celebrities. I have 3 daughters and the Palins would never be role models for me as a parent.
Posted by: Harold | September 1, 2008 3:51 PM | Report abuse
Let me guess .... Gov. Palin favors "abstinance-only" sex education, right? ---- You know, I don't like to be holier-than-thou but if I had a special needs newborn and a teenage daughter who had gotten pregnant .... and had NOTHING to offer in the way of national leadership!! .... I'd like to think I would have politely declined Sen. McCain's offer. Instead she turns her back on all those responsibilities in order to be a shallow token in a (hopefully) losing battle. Bah! Her judgment and genuine caring for those in her care appears to be equal to McCain's, - about as poor as it can possibly be! If this pair gets elected .... I cannot bear to think of it.
Posted by: Elizabeth | September 1, 2008 3:51 PM | Report abuse
In a rational world, this would not be news.
It is amazing how many supposedly pro-woman liberals are willing to sling mud in this situation. They themselves are the only ones it is sticking to.
Their comments also reflect poorly on their candidate, who at least had the dignity to declare this a non-issue.
Posted by: Typical | September 1, 2008 3:51 PM | Report abuse
The powers that be just erased my comment called "Hood Justice" Because I went ahead and put some rap lyrics up from that song"My Baby Daddy"..If that was Obama girl, the neo-cons would have called her a hood rat and that her parents didn't do a good job with her..And the shotgun wedding thing, they'd have been all over his arse on that one. These neo-cons don't seem to get it, from the hood to the good, it's all the same.
Posted by: rottnkid | September 1, 2008 3:51 PM | Report abuse
I am pro-choice and pro-life. I don't want teens to be involved in premarital sex but these things happen.
Politicians use the "social values" platform to manipulate the public. We have had 6-8 years of republican rule and we still have abortion but now we are murderers in Iraq.
Obama is no better. He says he doesn't want to fight the wrong war. He didn't say that he was anti-war.
Both sides are being played.
Stop being so hateful everyone.
Vote for Ron Paul. Take a look at his platform (the Constitution) and write him in, if necessary.
Ron Paul 08!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:51 PM | Report abuse
Non-issue
You libs only hope it could be.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:51 PM | Report abuse
"Bombshell announcement"??? Is this even news? Seriously, who the f--k cares?
Posted by: FelixA9 | September 1, 2008 3:51 PM | Report abuse
It's obvious from the liberal posts here that McCain made the perfect choice for VP. Their minds just do not know how to process the fact that the REPUBLICANS were the ones to put a woman on the ticket. There juvenille and hypocrtical comments are what I expected from them.
I expect they will continue to do so and in the process will make Sarah Plain a folk hero by the time November rolls around.
Posted by: David | September 1, 2008 3:51 PM | Report abuse
I think this will have an impact on some degree. It doesn't take much for some people to change their minds. And personally I feel bad for the girl, I know at 17 I would not want a child, let alone a husband. I just hope Gov. Palins beliefs aren't getting in the way of the girls choices. Now i dont know what the laws are in Alaska but 17 year olds cant terminate pregnancy without parental consent. im wondering if thats why it took so long for this to come out. A pro-life family getting an abortion right before November? Doesn't look good for anyone. But good luck to her and her family. And a nice way to get the pro-life votes.
Posted by: samantha | September 1, 2008 3:51 PM | Report abuse
I find it hard to believe a seventeen year old can hide a pregnancy in a small town in Alaska. If Trig is Bristal's the truth will come out with just some elementary reporting. Hiding it will only make it worse. Remember if we have learned anything since Watergate, it's not necessarily the act that gets you in trouble. It's the cover up that terminates careers.
My heart goes out to the Palin family.
Posted by: Tom | September 1, 2008 3:50 PM | Report abuse
Was about to do some work on this Labor Day evening, but just before saw 2 items of news which all (I mean 'all' too for the sake of your individual humanity & self-justification as humans who interact with others -- as Rodney King said - can't we all just get along?) of the commentators here should read without delay.
1. Time just put up a very humanizing article that in Palin's hometown just about everybody knew about the pregnancy. Also, it reiterates that Palin is not against birth control but more for avoiding abortions (what really is so evil about that - come on?). The journalist makes the same point I have been making also - Alaska is not the other 49 states - life is rough, very challenging and unforgiving - the way it was for our parents & predecessors versus the fat happy urban existences most of have currently - an aberration really of overall human existence (which personally I think deludes the left into falling into progressive mentalities when life is much more unforgiving & taxing than we seemingly want to acknowledge in this era of modernity). Which underscores the validity & authenticity of Palin's existence, experience & authenticity as a 'real person' verus 95% of the poltical phonies. In a gentle wish to all Americans - even the hard leftys of DailyKos so obsessed with hating GOPers - go read it & get a better understading of Palin, Alaska & real people - unless you are so obsessed with poltics & hate for those you disagree with (in other words - get a life). 2. Compared to Gore or Kerry I actually have a positive vibe about Obama which is one reason he has been framed as 'transformative'. This sentiment I have is backed up by what he said tonight - leave the Palin's alone - family's are (& should be) off limits - especially the kids. Obama adds that his mother bore him when she was 18 (for all the 'high principled' parents who are slamming the Palin's here). Life is messy especially when it comes to teenagers & birhts/pregnancies). The hypocrisy you perceive & sneer at from the GOP or right or christians or whomever is your favorite bogeyman sounds like you are almost looking in the mirror and expressing self-loathing. To Obama's credit, he is saying the right things - which does not surprise me. Which can allow us to get back to issues, policies, character, judgment & views versus slamming parenting skills, etc. My problem, with Obama is his lack of experience - he may be talented but is naive. Palin as Gov of small but important state has more relevant experience than Obama & Biden - and you can throw in energy expertise into the mix - she trashed the big oil companies there.
In honor of Sen. Obama's family class - to all have a nice remainder of Labor Day (even missymoto who I slammed earlier)
Posted by: Reaction to Closed Minds | September 1, 2008 3:50 PM | Report abuse
Can you imagine the venom that would be coming from the religious right and James Dobson if Barack Obama had a teen daughter who was pregnant? Please. Hannity, Limbaugh etc. would be eviscerating him. Look, this is indeed a personal matter. What is fair game is whether the McCain/Palin policy position on choice would force other families to make the same decision they did.
Posted by: Peter Zheutlin | September 1, 2008 3:50 PM | Report abuse
In the house of mirrors created by people like Huey Long, George Wallace, Nixon, and the handlers of Reagan, Bush, and McCain, everything is upside down compared to what it "should" by according to the values of mores of well-bred, educated people. This is the Achilles heel of the liberals. They just don't understand the mob's values at all. If they did, they would despair if they're for Obama, like me, because they would immediately realize that Bristol's pregnancy is the BEST thing that could have happened to Palin, It provides total Teflon for her, because the mob, especially the Evangelicals, will RALLY around mother and daughter with "Christian charity" to "protect" them from the evil MSM and snide elites. The Republicans know, like Long and Wallace, that everything in politics is about CLASS. Palin's choice was genius. She'll help defeat the elitist Obama this year, the absolutely wipe the floor with Wellesley Hillary in '12, before crushing feminism itself. Life's ironic, don't you think? Hillary has been Joan the Baptist for The One who will break the glass ceiling in order to end abortion rights for women.
Posted by: jeanrenoir | September 1, 2008 3:50 PM | Report abuse
I can't believe Gov. Palin's 17-year-old daughter would post all those pics showing her with alcohol and with curse words in the captions on her public MySpace page?? What is the legal drinking age in Alaska anyway?
Posted by: HitmanHalley | September 1, 2008 3:50 PM | Report abuse
Read the blogs and look at the photographs. Sarra Palin claims to have broken her "water" at 4:00 AM prior to a keynote address later that morning in Texas. She then, having broken her water, flew eight hours on a flight, another hour or more to a small town hospital in Alaska to give borth to a known "retarded" child. If this wasn't utterly preposterous, it would be criminally negligent.
Look at the photos, check out Bristol, she was pregnant and still has a baby bump to this day. Note that she is the one holding and nursing Trig. Look at the photos of her mother, she doesn't even have a pudgy profile or chin...this is a joke.
She is a freak and should not be the Vice President. WATCH: The RNC will kill her candidacy within five days!!!
Posted by: Scott in Pismo Beach | September 1, 2008 3:50 PM | Report abuse
We've only known her for 3 days now.
The more in know of her the more I think she is perfect for Alaska but wrong as the vp of America.
1. I saw a picture of Palin and daughter standing over a large dear that they just shot down. Blood was coming out of its mouth and body. I wonder what PITA will say about her slaughtering of animals for sport.
2. The article states that her 17 year old daughter agreed to marry the father. Is this going to be a shotgun wedding? Women don’t marry at 17 because of a baby.
3. Palin make sure that the daughter and the other 4 children are having their parental needs meet first.
Posted by: Juice | September 1, 2008 3:50 PM | Report abuse
!Therefore, Bristal is carrying the Messiah!
I always knew McCain would choose Jesus as his running mate."
LOL !!!Than what is litle Trig, John the Apostle? lol
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:50 PM | Report abuse
Abstinence education wins again! Thanks Moral Majority!
Posted by: EthnicRedneck | September 1, 2008 3:49 PM | Report abuse
From my email today. Read it, if you dare:
from a friend of mine in Alaska:
Sarah Palin is the US's answer to Margaret Thatcher! Anyone
who thinks she cannot handle the job or deal briskly and efficiently with
ANY issue, including foreign governments ... well, they haven't met our Sarah
.
As an Alaskan resident as well as a resident of Wasilla, AK, where
Sarah Palin was at one time Mayor ... I can speak with confidence. Governor
Sarah Palin of Alaska is exactly what she portrayed during her introduction
this morning and exactly what our US Government needs. She is ethical to a
fault (if there is such a thing), a refreshing change to the status-quo and
as smart and determined a PERSON (gender really isn't an issue here as far
as I'm concerned) as anyone could ask for at the head of government.
Sarah is no naïve "small town mayor" - she just *started out* there.
Btw, as Mayor of Wasilla, she brought this "small town" through a lot of
GOOD changes and left it at the end of her term having grown to the 4th
largest CITY in Alaska - a lot of growth and a stronger economic base than
ever before.
She has EXECTUTIVE experience *running a government* (something NONE
of the other candidates can actually boast, even John McCain ) as
Governor of Alaska and got there by defeating the *incumbent* Republican
Governor, who was definitely part of the "old school" and who WAS very much
in the pocket of the big oil companies. We in Alaska wanted change - and we
got it in the person of Sarah Palin!
Sarah Palin is everything she looks to be and more. Her approval
rating as Governor of Alaska has been as high as 95% and is currently
leveled out consistently in the upper 80 percentile throughout the state
(and in both parties) - the HIGHEST approval rating of ANY sitting Governor.
Sarah has been turning around corruption in the Legislature of
Alaska - turning things on their ear for that matter; cutting spending in
spite of the increased income the state is currently receiving due to the
high oil prices - she has insisted on putting a huge amount of the
"windfall" into savings for the future rather than spending, spending,
spending - and has insisted from the get-go on what she refers to as
"honest, ethical and transparent governing" - no more closed door meetings
and dealings - the big oil companies thought she would be a pushover and
have learned better to their chagrin.
She understands the "real people" and the economic issues we all
face (Alaskans along with the rest of the country) - she was one of "us" not
long ago. Rather than passing useless "laws" or throwing money at pet
projects, she (most recently) temporarily suspended the state gas tax (on
gasoline at the pumps, fuel oil and natural gas for homes, etc.) and has
ordered checks issued to ALL residents of Alaska this fall in an attempt to
assist with the burden of high fuel costs for the upcoming winter. I could
go on and on, but that's enough for now . She isn't doing these
things to be popular - she is doing it because her constituents are HURTING
financially and she can help.
She became Governor of Alaska by defeating the Incumbent Republican
Governor and doing it *without* the money or the support of the Republican
Party, which was amazing in itself - and she won by a landslide. The "powers
that be" at that time totally underestimated Sarah and learned better the
hard way. She has done exactly what she claimed she was going to do and is
just as popular today as the day she was elected - perhaps more so since
even the Democrats up here seem to like her - she works well with both sides
in the Legislature here.
Sarah "belongs" to us (Alaskans) ... and although we are going to be
terribly sorry to see her leave before she finishes the job she started here
(two years ago) straightening out OUR State ... we understand she is
needed for a bigger purpose and hopefully her Lt. Governor will be able to
fill her shoes here and continue the job.
As for worrying about what would happen if McCain were to die or
step down or whatever ... Theta, up here in AK we've only been wondering how
long we would be able to KEEP Sarah in Alaska and have seen her as our first
woman President of the USA from the start. It's always been a matter of
whether she would wait until the end of her TWO terms as Governor (no doubt
at ALL that she would be re-elected if she ran for a second term at the end
of her current term) ... or end up in Washington sooner. She could do the
job TODAY.
Personally, I feel a lot better about McCain now that I know he has
someone as savvy, as strong, as ethical and as steady as Sarah at his back.
She will be an excellent Vice President ... and my guess is will be our US
Republican Presidential candidate in four years - AND by then the country
will KNOW here - will love and respect her as we do here - and she'll win by
as much of a landslide as she did here in Alaska. I only wonder if McCain
has a clue what he is unleashing on the US of A . She is going to be a
fresh wind, but also a strong wind.
Is that enough of an endorsement? If not, I'll add this ... Jerry
and I have for many years felt the best "vote" was to vote for the lesser of
two "evils" and hope they didn't do too much damage. Two years ago during
our State Governor's race was the first time EVER that we actually asked for
not just a little sign to put in our yard showing our support of our
candidate (something we've never felt the desire to do at all before) - we
asked for a full 4' x 8' "SARAH PALIN FOR GOVERNOR!" sign and were proud to
have it. She hasn't let us or Alaska down. She will do the same for the USA
if given the opportunity.
Feel free to pass this on to anyone who may be interested (and spam
those who aren't!).
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 3:49 PM | Report abuse
All I have to say Is, I would love to smell and kiss Gov Palin and Bristol's feet, mmmmmmmmmmmmm. Guess I have a political Foot Fetish!!
Posted by: Thomas G | September 1, 2008 3:49 PM | Report abuse
So what? A 17 year old is pregnant? Oh my Gosh!!! It's the end of the world!! At least the 17 year old has a loving family that understands, forgives and can help. Obama would kill(abort) that child.
Posted by: Johnny | September 1, 2008 3:49 PM | Report abuse
By all means.
Anything to take the emphasis off of Barry's lack of experience.
Posted by: 9945e | September 1, 2008 3:49 PM | Report abuse
This story goes nowhere. So what if her daughter's pregnant? She's not running for mom in chief, and even the best moms have 17yr old daughter pregnancies. That's just the way it goes and it's not gonna change as long as kids still have hormones.
If you wanna follow a story, look at the ties with Ted Stevens and leave the "what example does this set?" lunacy to Dobson and crew.
Posted by: Grimmix | September 1, 2008 3:49 PM | Report abuse
McCAin should dump Palin and pick up Jindal after Jindal shows he has the chops by managing the hurricane crisis.
That would be a ticket that could be taken seriously!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:49 PM | Report abuse
Will the shotgun wedding involve the governor's mansion, and actual shooting? Who knew we would once have the chance to vote for a Republican with such prestigious aspirations!
Posted by: Next time nominate my dog | September 1, 2008 3:48 PM | Report abuse
Are we sure that Bristol is only 17 other than 27 or older? Anyhow, she looks mature enough to be a great American mother. Please leave her alone!!!
Posted by: Markson | September 1, 2008 3:48 PM | Report abuse
it's a non-issue.
Posted by: lorka | September 1, 2008 3:48 PM | Report abuse
It's a family matter and not a political issue. If the parents had not been told I cannot imaginine the torment the girl has put herself through. LEAVE THEM ALONE!
Posted by: Steve in St. Louis | September 1, 2008 3:48 PM | Report abuse
Until Obama stands up and gives a speech telling bloggers and the media to grow up, back off, and focus on the issues he has no credibility. I've yet to see a major story about his radical connections, his parent's radical connections, or his questionable birth. Only place they are brought up are on blogs and usually by leftist fascists trying to get the rumors out there so they can say Republicans started it. Grow up and get a life. Your left wing neo-fascist hate mongering isn't going to work all it will do is bring on a 2nd civil war.
Posted by: anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:48 PM | Report abuse
"This makes the kid look human, but it makes Sarah look like a monster! Who would accept the nomination knowing what she did? She HAD to have known this would get out. She must be so ambitious that she didn't care what it would do to her family. I'm sorry, but she must be a total monster."
Well said!
Of course the mother ultimately doesn't have control if her daughter makes a mistake, but anybody who has an OUNCE of dignity or integrity would have avoided the limelight to protect her daughter from the media frenzy that was sure to follow, not LAUNCH herself into the limelight.
definitely shows bad judgement by mccain and palin.
Posted by: CBB from CA | September 1, 2008 3:48 PM | Report abuse
Barack Obama always claims he's a new kind of politician and that his campaign is above the usual mudslinging tactics. But Obama's left-wing shock troops, especially the thousands that dominate the Internet, have no moral scruples whatsoever in their attempts to destroy anyone they perceive as their idol's adversary. They did their utmost to destroy Hillary Clinton and now they're on a stampede to trample Sarah Palin to death. These are slash and burn troops who show no mercy.
Posted by: ichief | September 1, 2008 3:47 PM | Report abuse
Okay, this one needs to be figured out and NOW.
Someone posted this MySpace thing below.
Follow me, here, cause it is friggin confusing.
This girl, Sadie, her brother's name is Levi...the same Levi in the 'statement' today?
She calls Sarah 'mommy in-law' in a pic that's on her site. Her new BROTHER is TRIG.
These pics are from this past APRIL or MAY.
BRISTOL is in the pic with Sadie and the kid.
Unless it's all photoshopped and made up, but...this is TOO GOOD to be true??
Are Bristol and Levi the parents of Trig for real?? Or, am I having an aneurysm from all this?
Is Palin's oldest son married?
Why does she call Palin her mother in law? Something fishy is going on here: Note picture of girl's "brother" who just happens to be named, uh, "LEVI!!" So we might assume that this is the Levi in her statement then. Then why does this girl call Trig her brother? It's all very confusing.
http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewImage&friendID=63524358&albumID=0&imageID=9866485
Posted by: Chic65 | September 1, 2008 3:47 PM | Report abuse
TO: Quietus Maximus who posted at 3:38pm
You wrote: "Political impact? Is Bristol Palin running for office? Oh, right. This is America, where everybody's business is everybody else's. This stupid country... Glass houses and stones for everyone."
Say what you want about the candidates or their families or even about me, but don't EVER call my country stupid! You could put PeeWee Herman in the Oval Office and this would still be the best damn country on the planet! Embrace your free speech because you're in a coutry that allows it!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:47 PM | Report abuse
Tough2Name,
Would it have been better for this child to have an abortion two and not told anybody? Any child (person) may make a mistake. It is what follows that is JUST as important. I think they may the best decision and it shows that the Palin's words and action are the same!!!
Posted by: Cirly | September 1, 2008 3:47 PM | Report abuse
Lets see here, under investigation for abuse of power, a right to lifer who likes to hunt and therefore to kill, and a religious example of republican family values. Thank God this wasn't a democrat or the story would be Obama/Biden are running a cat house and now they want to run it from the oval office. Perhaps Palin needs to take better care of her family before she tries to take care of mine! That she is willing to put her son in harms way to avenge an act of revenge on the part of Little King George is admirable but to serve as a clerk in the green zone is not that dangerous or is it? If it is then even the "surge" is another dismal failure of the retreaded right.
As a republican, this is nothing more than another bait and switch version of leadership for profit.
Posted by: anOPINIONATEDsob | September 1, 2008 3:47 PM | Report abuse
This, my friends, is the moral values party that would like you to elect them president instead of those Godless heathen Democrats.
The Pres. candidate-adulterer, gigolo, ne'er do well son of privilege. The candidate's wife-husband stealer, drug addict, disowns the rest of her family. The VP candidate-liar, holier-than-thou holy roller, mom to 16 year old pregnant teenager. The VP candidate's husband-drunk driver. A clean and wholesome crowd to be sure.
I see that the rest of the holier-than-thou holy rollers are all down with this moral values crowd so they want McCain to keep the Palins. And Chris Cillizza want McCain to keep the Palins and for no one to be allowed to draw any negative inferences.
Whatever.
So McCain faces a dilemma - he can either keep the Palins or get rid of them. He will face the consequences in any event.
Posted by: Mary | September 1, 2008 3:47 PM | Report abuse
"wingedwheel"
Ex-Army - don't agree with you...
Posted by: 999dfr | September 1, 2008 3:47 PM | Report abuse
Yes publicly savaging this woman and her family for something that could have happened to any other family in America is definitely the way to go..........
Ranks right up there with Kerry's 2004 "I think I'll just tell everyone to vote for me because I went to Vietnam" startegy
As someone who is not voting for McCain but also does not want to see Obama anywherenear the white house I'd encourage you people to keep attacking Sarah Palin and her family...........
Posted by: Marc | September 1, 2008 3:47 PM | Report abuse
I am no political pro but this story made me sick of Sarah. My opinion is Sarah's political priorities have screwed up her teen daughter's future. What else you can expect from a "broken" family? I meant broken in the sense of not giving close attention and care to her own teen daughter. So much for the family values. Where is the true judgement? Sarah for president in an event of the death of president? God bless America!
Posted by: Alan P | September 1, 2008 3:47 PM | Report abuse
I can conjecture as i write this blog, mccain is boiling mad that he selected and "tundra trash" right to lifer who does practice what she preaches by having a daughter who procreates akin to a seal--having back 2 back cubs!!!! Obama and Biden are doing just that "Biden" time to saunter into the white house in January!!! Senator mccain your are truly out of touch with american's needs and values, accordingly, due to this you've made one of the most historical blundered vp selections in presidential running history!!! ha ha he he, off to the white house obama and biden b, bee, bea!!!
Sarah Palin is just that "pale" in comparison to Senator Biden!!!! At least all of his children and grandchildren are legally born and not out of wedlock!!!! Perhaps Palin should reexamine her right to life position due to now it's she's got a daughter who having children and she's one herself!!!!! I truly do believe in the right to choose!!!! This is a prime compelling argument why we should never reverse Rhode vs Wade!!!
Posted by: tankuzoemuch4democraticsruleagane | September 1, 2008 3:47 PM | Report abuse
GOP! Nothing is out of limit for them. High standard!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Goggat | September 1, 2008 3:46 PM | Report abuse
A rather important point that the media has thus far missed:
It is impossible that the McCain vetting team knew about this in advance.
a) McCain originally wanted to choose Lieberman, Pawlenty or Ridge. He was forced to reject these choices because the *evangelical* faction would not accept someone who did not meet their criteria for their set of values.
b) Do you therefore mean to say that, in attempting to select someone who would satisfy these values voters, the McCain team would *knowingly* select someone who has a teenage daughter who is illegitimately pregnant? Utterly contradictory and, if known, would have defeated the purpose of the choice.
c) Therefore, we also now have the issue of the McCain camp covering up its incomplete vetting by stating that they knew what they obviously did not know in the first place.
Posted by: Marie Stewart | September 1, 2008 3:46 PM | Report abuse
I am amazed by McCain's vetting process. Way to go McCain!!! Out of all the people in our party that you could have selected you throw a hail Mary pass and obviously it wasn't caught. There goes the election. What a waste
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:46 PM | Report abuse
Save Bristol from a forced marriage!!!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:46 PM | Report abuse
Repeat after me:
USE A CONDOM
If this happened to my daughter, I would quit my job and focus 100% of my time on my parenting, because clearly there is a problem here.
These people can't raise their kids, and they want to run the country????????
Posted by: Evileconboy | September 1, 2008 3:46 PM | Report abuse
OMG, this totally means McCain will win!
Since the neo-con preaching of abstinence only clearly means that this is an immaculate conception. Therefore, Bristal is carrying the Messiah!
I always knew McCain would choose Jesus as his running mate.
This is going to be a 90% to 10% victory for McCain.
Everyone knows that abstinence only education is effective. This is the only way this can play out!
I don't believe it...the neo-cons were right!
Posted by: Inverse137 | September 1, 2008 3:46 PM | Report abuse
If anything the Democrats have taught Republicans over the years to be more forgiving and understanding of personal issues. This would have been a train wreck 20 years ago. Today.. it is accepted that issues like this are in many families and it is not the end of the world. The big problem here is that a woman is running for VP and those kinds of human beings must not be allowed to do more than procreate anyway. While we are at it, let's be sure only white males have a shot at even running for office. This IS 1964 -- RIGHT ??
Posted by: me3tv | September 1, 2008 3:46 PM | Report abuse
You know what amuses me the most about this whole thing?
The fact that everyone seems to think Bristol had a choice. Before the fact that Palin is a staunch opponent of all forms of abortion, one can rest well assured that her daughter was told in no uncertain terms an abortion would hurt mommy's political career.
While certainly true of any politician, Democrat or Republican, the mere suggestion that the poor girl had any choice in the matter is laughable.
Posted by: Paying Attention | September 1, 2008 3:46 PM | Report abuse
You people are all so pathetic. Don't all of you have someplace where you can go play jacks or marbles or pull the tail of the neighbors
cat?
Posted by: Jimtracker | September 1, 2008 3:45 PM | Report abuse
something stinks about this pick,there are too many stories that don't add up.alaska daily news asked the guv's press sec about her own pregnacy and he stated he didn't know she was pregnant.mccain has bombed and not iran.
Posted by: bob j | September 1, 2008 3:45 PM | Report abuse
OH btw, despite all the mud slinging, all the talk about how weak the Palin pick is, the supposed insult felt by women about the Palin pick, and oh yes, all the grandiose talk, speeches, greek pillars, more empty rhetoric from the One, coming together at the Dem convention, the latest CNN poll shows deadlock, 49/48.
ANd the Repubs did n't have a convention yet.
SO, Nob has managed to achieve the smallest convention bounce in history - zero pts!
Way to go, Nob!!
Posted by: intcamd1 | September 1, 2008 3:45 PM | Report abuse
Quote: "The fact that Palin did not reveal her 17-year-old daughter's curent pregnancy earlier, amid all the rumors, makes me wonder if she's still lying."
Fact?? In your warped mind only. She did reveal the pregnancy to McCain before he picked her. Read up, if you can. the daughter is not running for the VP position, the mother is. It happens in the best of families as I should know.
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 3:45 PM | Report abuse
I wonder what color shotgun Sarah will bring to her daughter's wedding.
Posted by: Mark | September 1, 2008 3:45 PM | Report abuse
lefties are stirring up nothing. she cam unto the scene with her holier than thou attitude- claiming that abortion is morally wrong but pre martial sex is not. don't blame the leftiesok.
Posted by: jay | September 1, 2008 3:45 PM | Report abuse
How's that "abstinence only" birth control working for you now? Epic Fail!
Posted by: cmotdibbler | September 1, 2008 3:45 PM | Report abuse
This news is such bull and pure political muck. Why is there question that the child would not be kept???? unless, there is. Palin and her family is like most - ISSUES, so she and her supporters should try and minimize putting her up on a pedastle because all I've heard is a bunch of smoke and mirrors and in the end........all truths will come on. Now that McCain admitted he only met her ONCE, he/staff should be working triple-time to properly vet her, otherwise, every week we will be treated to another news bombshell. The kids made a mistake so to keep face on the situation, they are going to FORCE THE KIDS TO GET MARRIED. Do you know of people who were also forced and their young lives were miserable!!!!!!!
Posted by: Insane | September 1, 2008 3:45 PM | Report abuse
First I wonder how many people posting here are parents? Most of us do our best everyday to teach our children. They are not always going to listen (whether they are republican or democrat). When a family goes though a time like this it shouldn't matter their religion, political affiliation or color of their skin. What matters is that the parents show unconditional love for their daughter. Please stop making a political issue out of a private matter. My parents were devout christians and my sister got pregant. This doesn't make my parents "bad". Unfortunately, my sister made a poor decision to have unprotected sex. However, today I have a great 26 year old nephew who is a great friend to me. For all of you that are parents out there maybe turn off the computer and spend a little time with your kids. Tell them you love them and you will support them always. Try to stop the hatred. These horrible postings will not determine the next president.
Posted by: Brendan | September 1, 2008 3:45 PM | Report abuse
"I'm a card carrying conservative and I'm appalled by the behavior of the Palin's 17 year old daughter and her parents. "
Her parents didn't impregnate her...
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:45 PM | Report abuse
The "father" of Bristol Palin's child is going to do the right thing and make a "honest woman" out of Sarah Palin's 17-year-old pregnant daughter. This could actually work to McCain's advantage by energizing TWO core GOP constituencies, the pro-lifers and the NRA: A SHOT GUN WEDDING! Whatcha wanna wager that John McCain vets whoever replaces Sarah Palin on the ticket with more than a quick phone call and a visit?
Posted by: Casey Jones | September 1, 2008 3:45 PM | Report abuse
The Democrats understand teenagers have sex and get pregnant. It is the Republicans that try to deny their children have sex. We Democrats care more about what kind of decision making ability this shows. C'mon if anyone on either side thinks picking Palin now was a good decision they are either lying or blind. McCain makes decisions just like Bush. By trusting his gut instead of doing his homework and conducting a minimal vetting process.
Posted by: Chris | September 1, 2008 3:45 PM | Report abuse
Maybe Sarah Palin should spend more time at home raising her family.
Posted by: Tom | September 1, 2008 3:45 PM | Report abuse
"As a former U.S. Marine that served during the first gulf war from 1988-1992 it sickens me to see those portraying themselves as "active duty soldiers" actually believing Mccain is more qualified to be president then Obama.
Give me a break. The guy was fed with a silver spoon, went to Annapolis and his father was a senior officer who ensured his silver spoon fed boy made it through Annaplois.
A NAVY PILOT is no more capable of being the president then this soccer mom hes brought to the table.
The best leaders in America are rarely senior Military officers. I've worked side by side with high ranking officers, and beyond Colonel it's all politics and who you know that gets you ahead, it has NOTHING to do with your abilities as a leader.
Obama has years of experience in the Senate and knows full well how the political arena runs the world. I will sleep much better at night knowing his finger is on the trigger instead of some old maverick and his soccer mom side kick."
Thank God this clown is a FORMER Marine! Hate to think that our current armed forces might be infected with the mindset of one so clueless. Ten bucks says he was "dishonorably discharged."
Posted by: wingedwheel | September 1, 2008 3:45 PM | Report abuse
Democrats who use Bristol against Palin are every bit as stupid as the Republicans who say that Obama is a Muslim.
Start thinking, people!
Posted by: thinkinghuman | September 1, 2008 3:45 PM | Report abuse
*This lady has been in office for only 20 months as governer
* She is under investigation for using her power in office to fire her x brother in law
* She has a 17 year old daughter who is 5 months pregnant
* She just gave birth to a baby with Down syndrome
I wish her the best of luck but is this the woman we want running the country? No way!!! Sounds like she needs help running her own life.
If I was a mother with a pregnant teen and a special needs newborn, the last thing I would do is take on such a huge position like VP of the country. Is this the "values" that the right wing promotes? Obama said that her teen daughter was off limits and he wouldnt use it for political reasons. Good for him but if the tables were turned, there is no way the republicans would let that go unpunished! I think this whole thing is a joke. Vote for Obama PLEASE!
Posted by: noelle | September 1, 2008 3:44 PM | Report abuse
McCain is not fit to lead the country. He makes bad decisions!!!!
Posted by: Susan | September 1, 2008 3:44 PM | Report abuse
"Judy, Sarah Palin is the US's answer to Margaret Thatcher! Anyone
who thinks she cannot handle the job or deal briskly and efficiently with
ANY issue, including foreign governments ... well, they haven't met our Sarah
.
As an Alaskan resident as well as a resident of Wasilla, AK, where
Sarah Palin was at one time Mayor ... I can speak with confidence. Governor
Sarah Palin of Alaska is exactly what she portrayed during her introduction
this morning and exactly what our US Government needs. She is ethical to a
fault (if there is such a thing), a refreshing change to the status-quo and
as smart and determined a PERSON (gender really isn't an issue here as far
as I'm concerned) as anyone could ask for at the head of government.
Sarah is no naïve "small town mayor" - she just *started out* there.
Btw, as Mayor of Wasilla, she brought this "small town" through a lot of
GOOD changes and left it at the end of her term having grown to the 4th
largest CITY in Alaska - a lot of growth and a stronger economic base than
ever before.
She has EXECTUTIVE experience *running a government* (something NONE
of the other candidates can actually boast, even John McCain ) as
Governor of Alaska and got there by defeating the *incumbent* Republican
Governor, who was definitely part of the "old school" and who WAS very much
in the pocket of the big oil companies. We in Alaska wanted change - and we
got it in the person of Sarah Palin!
Sarah Palin is everything she looks to be and more. Her approval
rating as Governor of Alaska has been as high as 95% and is currently
leveled out consistently in the upper 80 percentile throughout the state
(and in both parties) - the HIGHEST approval rating of ANY sitting Governor.
Sarah has been turning around corruption in the Legislature of
Alaska - turning things on their ear for that matter; cutting spending in
spite of the increased income the state is currently receiving due to the
high oil prices - she has insisted on putting a huge amount of the
"windfall" into savings for the future rather than spending, spending,
spending - and has insisted from the get-go on what she refers to as
"honest, ethical and transparent governing" - no more closed door meetings
and dealings - the big oil companies thought she would be a pushover and
have learned better to their chagrin.
She understands the "real people" and the economic issues we all
face (Alaskans along with the rest of the country) - she was one of "us" not
long ago. Rather than passing useless "laws" or throwing money at pet
projects, she (most recently) temporarily suspended the state gas tax (on
gasoline at the pumps, fuel oil and natural gas for homes, etc.) and has
ordered checks issued to ALL residents of Alaska this fall in an attempt to
assist with the burden of high fuel costs for the upcoming winter. I could
go on and on, but that's enough for now . She isn't doing these
things to be popular - she is doing it because her constituents are HURTING
financially and she can help.
She became Governor of Alaska by defeating the Incumbent Republican
Governor and doing it *without* the money or the support of the Republican
Party, which was amazing in itself - and she won by a landslide. The "powers
that be" at that time totally underestimated Sarah and learned better the
hard way. She has done exactly what she claimed she was going to do and is
just as popular today as the day she was elected - perhaps more so since
even the Democrats up here seem to like her - she works well with both sides
in the Legislature here.
Sarah "belongs" to us (Alaskans) ... and although we are going to be
terribly sorry to see her leave before she finishes the job she started here
(two years ago) straightening out OUR State ... we understand she is
needed for a bigger purpose and hopefully her Lt. Governor will be able to
fill her shoes here and continue the job.
As for worrying about what would happen if McCain were to die or
step down or whatever ... Theta, up here in AK we've only been wondering how
long we would be able to KEEP Sarah in Alaska and have seen her as our first
woman President of the USA from the start. It's always been a matter of
whether she would wait until the end of her TWO terms as Governor (no doubt
at ALL that she would be re-elected if she ran for a second term at the end
of her current term) ... or end up in Washington sooner. She could do the
job TODAY.
Personally, I feel a lot better about McCain now that I know he has
someone as savvy, as strong, as ethical and as steady as Sarah at his back.
She will be an excellent Vice President ... and my guess is will be our US
Republican Presidential candidate in four years - AND by then the country
will KNOW here - will love and respect her as we do here - and she'll win by
as much of a landslide as she did here in Alaska. I only wonder if McCain
has a clue what he is unleashing on the US of A . She is going to be a
fresh wind, but also a strong wind.
Is that enough of an endorsement? If not, I'll add this ... Jerry
and I have for many years felt the best "vote" was to vote for the lesser of
two "evils" and hope they didn't do too much damage. Two years ago during
our State Governor's race was the first time EVER that we actually asked for
not just a little sign to put in our yard showing our support of our
candidate (something we've never felt the desire to do at all before) - we
asked for a full 4' x 8' "SARAH PALIN FOR GOVERNOR!" sign and were proud to
have it. She hasn't let us or Alaska down. She will do the same for the USA
if given the opportunity.
Feel free to pass this on to anyone who may be interested (and spam
those who aren't!).
Posted by: Echo of Bill (thanks!) | September 1, 2008 3:44 PM | Report abuse
PALIN IS A MESS!!!
As a McCain supporter I am dismayed and frankly heartbroken.
Did he just want to collect our 7 million and THEN tell us about the boozing and out-of-wedlock sex?
Posted by: Bill in GA | September 1, 2008 3:44 PM | Report abuse
I know that many members of the angry, bitter left -- including myself -- are hoping that Bristol aborts that mass of protoplasm.
Posted by: twin_peaks_nikki | September 1, 2008 3:44 PM | Report abuse
John Waters, of Pink Flamingoes fame, will be comissioned to do a documentary about McCain / Palin White House. Oh yeah... Bring it on.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:43 PM | Report abuse
Hood Justice!!!!
T-Bird, I need some money for my baby
I ain't giving you no money, that ain't my baby
(Yes T-Bird, it was)
That ain't my kid
(Yes it is your daughter)
I got one son
(You got a daughter, too)
I got a son named Chris and that's it
(T-bird, you trippin')
I ain't smell that junk you talk
(T-Bird!)
Forget that!
(But T-Bird, I love you)
I ain't wit it, I ain't wit it
Who that is?
That's just my baby dad
Who that is?
That's just my baby dad
Who that is?
That's just my baby daddy
Who that is?
T-Bird, that's just my baby daddy
Posted by: rottnkid | September 1, 2008 3:43 PM | Report abuse
Hahahahahahaha!
How stupid and narcissistic can one be?
5 months pregers Holling and you didn't notice. Whats wrong with you!?!
As well McInsain knew nothing about this. Talk about Republican intelligence.
Check the kids for drug abuse.
ROFLMAO!
Posted by: Silly Ex-pat | September 1, 2008 3:43 PM | Report abuse
and Al GOre's kids were caught doing drugs- The Libs have always tried to be mean spirited. Hava you every met a happy Lib, NO- THey are always angry.
Posted by: mark | September 1, 2008 3:43 PM | Report abuse
Sarah Palin is the most selfish human being and disgusting. Using her daughter to be some political footbal instead of withdrawing and taking care of her family. YOU ARE DISGUSTING!
Posted by: Quincy | September 1, 2008 3:43 PM | Report abuse
"Ms. Palin needs to stay home more and hold up her end of being a parent and soon to be grandparent. Her family needs her."
No - her country need her as VP to balance the ticket.
Her husband takes care of the kids.
Welcome to the 21st century!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:43 PM | Report abuse
Even if Bristol were raped, Sarah Palin would want her to carry the baby of her attacker.
Posted by: McBain | September 1, 2008 3:43 PM | Report abuse
The issue of Bristol is a national security issue. The Secret Service must now go to Congress to get additional funding to provide security service for Bristol, her baby, and Bristol's soon to be husband. I don’t know what level of security the soon to be parents are entitled to. It will depend on Sen. McCain’s request and Congressional approval.
Any person about to enter federal service must undergo a suitability investigation. The purpose for the suitability investigation is to determine whether some condition exist that will cause the federal employee to abandoned or compromise their employment. The spouse and children are primary concerns; debt load and other financial issues are next. If the spouse or child or soon to be husband can be kidnapped then the perpetrators can make demands upon the federal employee (Vice-President). If the debt load is significant then the selling of national secrets are possible.
The Presidency and Vice-Presidency are high profile and very public positions. There is no expectation of privacy. We the people will vote on these candidates. Not a private issues at all.
Posted by: theodosia1 | September 1, 2008 3:43 PM | Report abuse
I'm a card carrying conservative and I'm appalled by the behavior of the Palin's 17 year old daughter and her parents. 1st of all, what's wrong with Bristol, sleeping around and popping out babies at 17 years old, is something wrong with this picture? Now her parents, Sarah and Todd, are they spending enough time with their own children to teach them proper morals? Obviously these are not model parents and this reflects on their ability to make proper, sound decisions. Sadly, I cannot support someone, who could possibly be the next president of the United States behind McCain, who cannot even guide their own children properly. What the hell was McCain even thinking when he selected Sarah Palin anyway? Oh boy.
Posted by: Card carrying conservative | September 1, 2008 3:43 PM | Report abuse
When Palin assumed the office of AK gov she used her power to get her personal enemies fired. Apparently, more than once. McCain knows about an ongoing "abuse of power" investigation in AK but gives her a pass. Why? This is an issue of confidence in McCain's judgement.
And why are the RW posters here so quick to gloss this over, because the people who got fired were BBAAAADD? while simultaneously magnifying all-out-of-proportion faults of democrats? This is BS, RW partisanship at the height of ridiculousness.
Forget voting FOR Obama/Biden, vote AGAINST McCain/Palin.
Posted by: anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:43 PM | Report abuse
I think it's great that she's keeping the baby and is planning to marry the dad. Those are great choices.
Best wishes to the Palin family, but please don't try to impose your values on my daughters.
Posted by: kd11 | September 1, 2008 3:42 PM | Report abuse
It's a lot to handle when you have to take care of two in diapers. I don't think we should ask Sarah to handle both McCain and Trig! McCain wears a pretty big diaper these days.
Posted by: Cullen | September 1, 2008 3:42 PM | Report abuse
This announcement DOES NOT address the question, that Sarah is Triggs grandmother.
This only proves the daughter is pregnant.
(again?)
And if you believe Sarah's statement last week, that her daughter had MONO five months ago, why, on earth did this girl get pregnant?
What kind of mother is this lady?
There is something very odd going on here.
Posted by: Irene55 | September 1, 2008 3:42 PM | Report abuse
I was on a conference call with Obama activists from Maryland this morning, and the call organizer mentioned that there was "huge news" damaging to Palin that she couldn't wait for media to announce. Obama activists need to be all over this.
Posted by: John | September 1, 2008 3:42 PM | Report abuse
Before attacking Palin, ask McCain about his OWN fathering... After marrying the rich chick, they had kids. Cindy lived in Arizona and John lived in DC -- except during short breaks. John didn't raise any kids, and he abandoned his first litter in order to get the $100M. According to public records, Cindy's father was a convicted felon too. Pubs are the most AMAZING hypocrites in the land. Family Values, my patooch.
Posted by: GuestPoster | September 1, 2008 3:42 PM | Report abuse
It's not about the pregnant daughter, just like it was never about what actually happened between Bill, Monica, and the blue dress. It's about the American people's distaste for lies.
We should NOT conveniently adopt a European-like blind eye to politicians' private lives just because the candidate is a Republican.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:42 PM | Report abuse
I certainly agree with Obama that this is a personal matter. It's not shocking, it's not shameful, it's not even sad. It's just a family dealing with one of the many unexpected curves of modern life. What is shameful is the wholly expected attacks on left wing bloggers trying to make hay out it.
Wrapping themselves in the flag and scripture while crying foul is there go to offense. While the Palins don't deserve it, the disciples of Atwater, Rove and Falwell have got it coming.
Posted by: kelly scott | September 1, 2008 3:42 PM | Report abuse
First of all I want to say I love WOMEN, Always have. I think I have been to bed with more women than the avarge Joe. In my case Ken
I noticed over the years that Christen women were always eaiser to get in bed than the average Lady. I want to make it clear I never went to church looking for a bed partner. Some guys do. I met mine in a lot of differeny places, including night clubs. After we get to her or my place. The first ? do you love me? Why sure Darling. She would say as she droped her pants are you sure? Oh yeah. They were always the best in bed.
IM 63 years old now and im very sorry for useing women the way I did. I did really love three of them.
I hope all of them had a little fun. I did. To the rest including the three I fell in love with I have asked God to forgive me and I hope all of you will to. I was in Vietnam and have cronic and sevier P T S D. Had it not been for that I would never done a lot of the things I have. I grew up as a happy kid out in the country in Southwest Arkansas. I came back from Nam at 21 already an old man. Ken
Posted by: Ken Fatherree | September 1, 2008 3:42 PM | Report abuse
I heard on Fox that the father is reported as being the Chairman of Exxon Alaska. Apparently, in return for help with her husbands indiscretion involving a female lobbyist from said company, Palin sacrificied her eldest born to a big oiling, personally staking her out on a pipeline just North of the Canadian border. A couple of Mounties who saw the whole thing are now in Gitmo. Personally I don't believe anything I hear on Fox...
Posted by: outofit | September 1, 2008 3:42 PM | Report abuse
Well Cheney has a carpet muncher of a daughter.. we'll get through this scandal too.
Posted by: TruckerT | September 1, 2008 3:42 PM | Report abuse
The left wingers are only going to shoot themselves in the foot if they continue to pursue this as an issue. The fact is, they know Palin trumps anything they have in terms of making positive changes, and they are panicking. Not only that, we see how Palin has been able to actually accomplish far more than Barack "Voting Present" Obama, the guy with the weakest resume of any presidential candidate in many, many years.
Posted by: Tom | September 1, 2008 3:42 PM | Report abuse
Why is it that everything I learn about this Palin woman points to her lack of responsibility and accountability. Where was she when her daughter needed her and in her absence reached out for someone else to love her? What kind of message does this send out to teenagers all over the world? Does this woman not know enough to put her child on birth control. Did she and her daughter not have a relationship that was such that the daughter could come and speak with the mother about these things? Why did they wait until the daughter is 5 months pregnant to announce she's gonna have a baby and she's gonna get married. At seventeen? Don't get me wrong. If she chooses to have the baby that's fine. If she chose not to have it that would be fine too, IMHO. But for the person who might be just a heartbeat away from the Presidency to manage her family in this careless and irresponsible manner convinces me that she is in no way capable of leading this country.
Hell! She can't even manage her own family! Would she have it that no one can take birth control pills? Whatever happened to Planned Parenthood? GEEZE!!! Let's call a spade a spade here. She's irresponsible and she's a liar to boot! And I, as an American woman, am highly offended that the McCain campaign would thrust this woman upon us and expect us to buy into the story that he KNEW about the daughter's pregnancy and also that we, as Americans, shouldn't speak a word about it.
I've heard ducks fart under water before!
"Fool me once...etc". :(
Posted by: Jazziette | September 1, 2008 3:41 PM | Report abuse
Oh wonder of wonders, the sleazy NObama campaign is now the dispenser of virtues?
The liberal media has a problem with Palin's daughter becoming pregnant?
I t was disgusting enough that media prostitutes like Dowd and Rich and Colby and RObinson, kept harping about Bill Clinton's affairs, and used it as an ammunition against HRC's campaign as well (never mind that the prostitute Dowd is still a spinster at 50, and probably has done half of DC's power elite). But now, they are now piling on Palin's 17 yr old daughter and assuming moral haughtiness?
Barrack's mom became pregnant at the same age, and did not marry wellinto her pregnancy. Yet this woman is extolled by Barrack and the rest of his campaign as some sort of moral paragon. ANd Palin's daughter is some how to be condemned? And it is a judgment failure on Mac's part if he chose to overlook this aspect of Palin's life in his VP pick?
The gutter rat groupies of Nob will sink to any depth; they showed the same traits when the trashed HRC; now they are showing the same faces in the general election campaign.
Shame on Nob, his campaign, and his disgusting gutter rat groupies!
Posted by: intcamd1 | September 1, 2008 3:41 PM | Report abuse
LOL How come the republicans have double standard. Hold on it is not double standard,they don't get it.
Posted by: Goggat | September 1, 2008 3:41 PM | Report abuse
Where's your compassion and empathy, people? I'd like to know the percentage of Americans at every socio-economic and educational level who have had an unplanned out-of-wedlock pregnancy themselves, or in their spouse/girlfriend/acquaintance or families. Of course, we can never know this, because such a high percentage of such pregnancies is quickly ended by an abortion. I think newscasters and the sensible and compassionate among us will leave this issue alone because of personal experiences and decency. Certainly the Party of the People won't be casting stones at a young girl and her supportive parents.
Posted by: Dot Davis | September 1, 2008 3:41 PM | Report abuse
"she must run on her values and her character."
No you aren't getting it we don't care about her daughters decisions, we care about HER conservative values.
You're candidate who is running for President has less executive experience than our candidate who is running for VP!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:41 PM | Report abuse
Ah, the postmodern irony!
There are few out there who really, truly believe that Palin's choice has more to do with her qualifications than with her devotion to Jesus, her patina of righteousness, and - most of all - the fact she has a vagina. "Whoo! Let's steal attention away from Obama by nominating a woman. And let's throw a sop to the 'gays are destroying the traditional family and down with sex ed' crowd while we're at it."
Whoopsie!
Posted by: mishi | September 1, 2008 3:41 PM | Report abuse
This needs a reprint:
[...]In the marketplace of ideas, social conservatism is a viral infection contaminating the GOP. It represents an evolutionary dead-end whose logical conclusion is fascism if not outright totalitarianism. Is it not obvious that the imposition of the evangelical ideology--any fundamentalist ideology for that matter--lies in direct opposition to a free people in a democratic land? Our Constitution, specifically the separation of church and state, no longer serves as a bulwark against the morality police, who seek to impose faith-based notions such as creationism upon those of us with rational minds. Social conservatives aim to constrain freedom of thought, freedom of choice, freedom to pursue happiness. These freedoms live at the heart of an entrepreneurial and economically strong America. No doubt, the diktat the social conservative movement wishes to impose upon ALL us Americans is antithetical to a free market system, and therefore exists as hypocrisy within the Republican platform. Privatize profits, socialize losses, and make religion the opiate of the masses. Indeed, this has been a dark eight years of Orwellian doubletalk. Enough! [...]
Get real people, you are being sold and re-sold by war-mongering monsters with no real moral values. Sad.
Posted by: socal | September 1, 2008 3:41 PM | Report abuse
"If it were Obama's daughter, we'd never had known about it, because his people would have spirited her off to an abortion clinic, with NDA signed all around."
Obama will probably teach his children to get an education first, in order to be financially independent woman, than find a life partner, get married and than have children, just like he and his wife did.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:40 PM | Report abuse
I agree. Sarah can keep her grandchild, but not make decisions for every one else. Pro choice is the way to do So is sexual education in school, right Sarah?
Definate aborthe candidate. Vote Obama.
Posted by: nfh | September 1, 2008 3:40 PM | Report abuse
Frankly, it is none of my business and has nothing to do with hlding public office. But it does piss me off that if it where a Democrat, the Republicans would be stampeding each other and slobbering all over themselves to make political hate from it.
Posted by: Ron Anderson | September 1, 2008 3:40 PM | Report abuse
Why are these Palin babies disturbing? First, a clearly ambitious woman over 40 with 4 children doesn't practice safe sex and gets pregnant during her first year as governor of Alaska. All of us who contemplated having children over 40 know how the chances of getting a Down syndrome baby go up. Does that show good judgment? While she's minding the statehouse, her second-born follows Mom's example and gets pregnant. Monkey see, monkey do.
As a mother of 3, I fully understand that children follow your example. Is this undisciplined example of motherhood really what we want our daughters to look up to, and can we ever think for a moment she will provide this country with clear-minded leadership?
Posted by: motherteacher | September 1, 2008 3:40 PM | Report abuse
We liberals were banging our heads on the wall to focus on Issues - while Karl Rove and his band of thugs were slinging Fake Accusations on Kerry's Campaign -- Now suddenly the conservative want to talk issues.
My sympathies are with poor Ms.Palin - the bloodhounds in the media are about to rip her apart for what should be a very private matter
But as far as the GOP is concerned - If they lose the election because of this - Consider it Divine Justice.
Posted by: Steve | September 1, 2008 3:40 PM | Report abuse
The idea that your child getting pregnant in late adolescence shows a failing as a parent is something you'd never say about anyone other than in this specific situation. Problem is that teens do things that their parents tell them not to. I did - I was lucky and didn't have to suffer the potential consequences. Palin's daughter did as well - she ended up in a different place. I don't think this is a failure of leadership any more than when an adolescent makes other mistakes against parental advice - e.g., marijuana or other drug experimentation, lots of other potential issues. But so many people have Palin Derangement Syndrome that they are unwilling to think things through. Kind of reminds me of the way that the Republicans went after Clinton so destructively and irrationally. Oh - his sexual activity was okay because it was later in life and he was already president, right? No leadership problems there.
Posted by: Lazlo Toth | September 1, 2008 3:40 PM | Report abuse
FACT #1: NOBAMAs' Mama was a unmarried teen, and his father left the family to go practice polygamy in Africa. Teh leftys seem pretty darn proud of this fact, they keep repeating it over and over and over ad naseum.
FACT # 2: Talking about Bristol Palin is a convienent way of ignoring REAL issues in this campaign, like Nobamas lack of experience, credentials, a viable platform, his socialist agenda, ties to Muslim radicals.
FACT # 3: The left is comapring the GOP #2 to the Dems #1. Interesting.
Fact # 4: The liberal left is beside themselves because conservatives finally found a women with the percieved "toughness" of Hillary, the class of Laura Bush, and she can make mincemeat of out Joe Biden in any fair debate. They have no defense left but to attack a teenager. How pathetic.
Posted by: MomMom | September 1, 2008 3:39 PM | Report abuse
Ms. Palin needs to stay home more and hold up her end of being a parent and soon to be grandparent. Her family needs her. Let someone else do the government work who doesn't have so many family demands on them at this point in their life.
Posted by: baby boomer voter | September 1, 2008 3:39 PM | Report abuse
McCain cheated on his first wife and the VP choice's daughter get's knocked up in 11th grade. Oh ya..that's the family value party!
Posted by: John | September 1, 2008 3:39 PM | Report abuse
The poor girl should get an abortion.
Posted by: john | September 1, 2008 3:39 PM | Report abuse
What type of message will the Republican VP pick be sending? Its ok to have sex and get pregnant, as a teen, as long as you go to full term. Wonder what they would have said if one of Obama's daughters were older and found them in the same situation. I bet it would have been on the order of, if he cant teach morality to his children the he isnt fit to lead the country.
Posted by: Mike C | September 1, 2008 3:39 PM | Report abuse
Received today via email
from a friend of mine who has a lot of friends in Alaska:
"Judy, Sarah Palin is the US's answer to Margaret Thatcher! Anyone
who thinks she cannot handle the job or deal briskly and efficiently with
ANY issue, including foreign governments ... well, they haven't met our Sarah
.
As an Alaskan resident as well as a resident of Wasilla, AK, where
Sarah Palin was at one time Mayor ... I can speak with confidence. Governor
Sarah Palin of Alaska is exactly what she portrayed during her introduction
this morning and exactly what our US Government needs. She is ethical to a
fault (if there is such a thing), a refreshing change to the status-quo and
as smart and determined a PERSON (gender really isn't an issue here as far
as I'm concerned) as anyone could ask for at the head of government.
Sarah is no naïve "small town mayor" - she just *started out* there.
Btw, as Mayor of Wasilla, she brought this "small town" through a lot of
GOOD changes and left it at the end of her term having grown to the 4th
largest CITY in Alaska - a lot of growth and a stronger economic base than
ever before.
She has EXECTUTIVE experience *running a government* (something NONE
of the other candidates can actually boast, even John McCain ) as
Governor of Alaska and got there by defeating the *incumbent* Republican
Governor, who was definitely part of the "old school" and who WAS very much
in the pocket of the big oil companies. We in Alaska wanted change - and we
got it in the person of Sarah Palin!
Sarah Palin is everything she looks to be and more. Her approval
rating as Governor of Alaska has been as high as 95% and is currently
leveled out consistently in the upper 80 percentile throughout the state
(and in both parties) - the HIGHEST approval rating of ANY sitting Governor.
Sarah has been turning around corruption in the Legislature of
Alaska - turning things on their ear for that matter; cutting spending in
spite of the increased income the state is currently receiving due to the
high oil prices - she has insisted on putting a huge amount of the
"windfall" into savings for the future rather than spending, spending,
spending - and has insisted from the get-go on what she refers to as
"honest, ethical and transparent governing" - no more closed door meetings
and dealings - the big oil companies thought she would be a pushover and
have learned better to their chagrin.
She understands the "real people" and the economic issues we all
face (Alaskans along with the rest of the country) - she was one of "us" not
long ago. Rather than passing useless "laws" or throwing money at pet
projects, she (most recently) temporarily suspended the state gas tax (on
gasoline at the pumps, fuel oil and natural gas for homes, etc.) and has
ordered checks issued to ALL residents of Alaska this fall in an attempt to
assist with the burden of high fuel costs for the upcoming winter. I could
go on and on, but that's enough for now . She isn't doing these
things to be popular - she is doing it because her constituents are HURTING
financially and she can help.
She became Governor of Alaska by defeating the Incumbent Republican
Governor and doing it *without* the money or the support of the Republican
Party, which was amazing in itself - and she won by a landslide. The "powers
that be" at that time totally underestimated Sarah and learned better the
hard way. She has done exactly what she claimed she was going to do and is
just as popular today as the day she was elected - perhaps more so since
even the Democrats up here seem to like her - she works well with both sides
in the Legislature here.
Sarah "belongs" to us (Alaskans) ... and although we are going to be
terribly sorry to see her leave before she finishes the job she started here
(two years ago) straightening out OUR State ... we understand she is
needed for a bigger purpose and hopefully her Lt. Governor will be able to
fill her shoes here and continue the job.
As for worrying about what would happen if McCain were to die or
step down or whatever ... Theta, up here in AK we've only been wondering how
long we would be able to KEEP Sarah in Alaska and have seen her as our first
woman President of the USA from the start. It's always been a matter of
whether she would wait until the end of her TWO terms as Governor (no doubt
at ALL that she would be re-elected if she ran for a second term at the end
of her current term) ... or end up in Washington sooner. She could do the
job TODAY.
Personally, I feel a lot better about McCain now that I know he has
someone as savvy, as strong, as ethical and as steady as Sarah at his back.
She will be an excellent Vice President ... and my guess is will be our US
Republican Presidential candidate in four years - AND by then the country
will KNOW here - will love and respect her as we do here - and she'll win by
as much of a landslide as she did here in Alaska. I only wonder if McCain
has a clue what he is unleashing on the US of A . She is going to be a
fresh wind, but also a strong wind.
Is that enough of an endorsement? If not, I'll add this ... Jerry
and I have for many years felt the best "vote" was to vote for the lesser of
two "evils" and hope they didn't do too much damage. Two years ago during
our State Governor's race was the first time EVER that we actually asked for
not just a little sign to put in our yard showing our support of our
candidate (something we've never felt the desire to do at all before) - we
asked for a full 4' x 8' "SARAH PALIN FOR GOVERNOR!" sign and were proud to
have it. She hasn't let us or Alaska down. She will do the same for the USA
if given the opportunity.
Feel free to pass this on to anyone who may be interested (and spam
those who aren't!).
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 3:39 PM | Report abuse
Maybe she should have spent less time at PTA meetings and more time actually teaching her children.
And, if she did think she taught them, maybe she should teach them about condoms instead of abstinence.
Posted by: ep thorn | September 1, 2008 3:39 PM | Report abuse
She's almost 18 - making you people idiots...
"almost 18" is what we refer to in mathematics as "17". Which means she is not yet an adult. Making you a moron.
Posted by: DJB | September 1, 2008 3:38 PM | Report abuse
Are we really sure that Bristol is only 17 other than 27 or older? She is certainly mature enough to be a good mother. Please leave her alone!!!
Posted by: Markson | September 1, 2008 3:38 PM | Report abuse
This is not my knid of American family. Sarah has five children. One with special needs and one who is a pregnant teen. McCain . . . what were you thinking picking her.
She is an insult to soccer moms, career moms, and all moms. She is a joke.
Posted by: nancy h | September 1, 2008 3:38 PM | Report abuse
I have to agree with an earlier post from Ginger, that we cannot control everything our teenagers do. All of the grownups in the room remember when you were kids? I dont try to control every aspect of my sons life, but I do set up rules and boundries for him. As a christian I am suppose to raise my child in a structured, loving, and disciplined way, but he still can shows that he can do stupid stuff.
Any parent would want thier child to do the right thing, and when they screw up like Palins daughter did we should all hope they would do the right thing. The right thing for the Palins was to keep the baby and marry, why should anyone think they have the right to berate them for that. I dare say if Bristol had aborted that baby the libs on this blog, that are so focused on thier hatred towards anything conservative, would have slammed her for doing something libs hold as the holy grail.
We should all hope and pray when we make our mistakes in public we are treated with more kindness and respect then yall are showing this family.
Posted by: Brian | September 1, 2008 3:38 PM | Report abuse
Political impact? Is Bristol Palin running for office? Oh, right. This is America, where everybody's business is everybody else's. This stupid country... Glass houses and stones for everyone.
Posted by: Quietus Maximus | September 1, 2008 3:38 PM | Report abuse
I am insulted at the absurdity of McCain's choice for VP and it just gets worse. ( I AM REPUBLICAN)
This woman wants to help control the White House when she cannot control her own house. I'm wondering if McCain has Alzheimers already. How could he possibly place the U.S. at risk. We see how important the VP position is by watching how much influence Cheney has.
Mc Cain I don't understand you!!!! What were you thinking in choosing Palin?
Posted by: Susan | September 1, 2008 3:38 PM | Report abuse
The issue here is not that the kid is pregnant. It's that the party of family values, of abstinence-only education, of righteous indignation at the moral failings of others refuses to turn that spotlight on itself.
The hypocrisy is what most Democrats, liberals, and rational thinkers resent.
Kids do dumb things, we all understand that. Parenting isn't the easiest thing in the world, we all understand that.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:38 PM | Report abuse
Well, since the family is conservative, the child will have a chance at life. If this was a liberal "family", the baby would have already been aborted, and this wouldn't have been an issue.
Posted by: romanobscure | September 1, 2008 3:38 PM | Report abuse
Palin has so much drama going on in her personal life not to mention heer professional life. She touts herself as a family values candidate while hiding, until today, her teen daughter's pregnancy. Dealing with that trauma and drama is a huge deal for any family. Troopergate is also taxing her time and reputation. Being Governor of Alaska is a huge job, one for which she was hardly prepared to hit the decks running. And now, on top of all that, McCain picks her as the "best qualified" person to run for Vice-President. Still, the press does not think anything untoward of all this. I am disgusted but not surprised by our corporate media's ability to kowtow to the Republican narrative (as usual) on things like this.
Posted by: Kimi Welsh | September 1, 2008 3:38 PM | Report abuse
I do not understand why Governor Palin accepted the VP candidate position, in view of her already full family life, both private and public.
Nonetheless, I must emphasize that the best possible parents on earth may suffer from the sinful and/or wrong choices of a child. The Christianity which I accept (Eastern Orthodoxy) never sidesteps the fact of an individual's personal responsibility. The seventeen-year-old daughter is the individual who chose, for whatever reasons, to risk pregnancy. The fact that she also chose to keep this baby, rather than murder him or her (AKA "abortion") points straight to the commendable elements of Governor and Mr. Palin's parenting values and teachings.
Posted by: AWC | September 1, 2008 3:37 PM | Report abuse
The poor girl should get an abortion.
Posted by: dave | September 1, 2008 3:37 PM | Report abuse
The bottom line is this: Palin and McCain knew this story was going to come out very quickly after she was announced as VP candidate. McCain showed very poor judgement picking Palin as VP, Palin showed very poor judgement agreeing to be VP. Palin has showed poor judgement or little concern for her children on many occasions, including; going on a plane in labor (did she want the baby to die), not supervising her children and allowing her daughter to engage in unsafe sex, agreeing to campaign only months after giving birth to a Down's Syndrom child. McCain showed poor judgement picking a VP with such poor credentials (education, experience, extreme positions, scandals, etc.), and Palin showed poor judgement in accepting. Not announcing the pregnacy while at the same time trying to present Palin as this woman with a perfect family, and somehow expecting that nobody would ever find out it beyond the realm of reason. They picked today to let the story out because they are expecting that everyone is watching the hurricane.
The scandal here is not about a pregant unwed teenager, it's about the truely unbelievably bad judgement that both McCain and Palin have displayed at many many points in their adult life. You could pick from half the people in America at random, and expect to get better judgement than McCain and Palin have displayed as adults. And don't say that Obama experimented with drugs as a teen, or that he should have stayed away from Rezko or Wright. The drugs were when he was a teenager, and he realized his mistake with Rezco and Wright. McCain and Palin are still making these mistakes today.
Posted by: Captbilly | September 1, 2008 3:37 PM | Report abuse
The choice of Palin continues to surprise and distract us, doesn't it? Was that John McCain's hope as to what she could do for his campaign, to divert the voters away from the major problems facing our nation and focus their attention instead on issues of personal morality and political beliefs? Given Palin's resume, it would appear that McCain blithely assumes himself to be immortal and American voters to not be very bright.
At a time when our country faces two vexing wars that are bleeding us economically and militarily, an economy in decline in part because of lax regulation and a host of other issues and challenges that cry out for public concensus, this hardly seems like the time to push forward an unknown and untested individual who seems more inclined to start controversy than to resolve it. Can we spare the time to argue, rather than getting right to work to solve our problems? This is not an encouraging indication as to the quality and probity of McCain's decisions, is it?
Finally, the pregnancy of the Palin daughter is indeed a private matter. Given the increased support she will need, reasonable observers may well ask why she was not accorded more privacy and support by her family, who instead appear to have "outed" her dilemma for purely political purposes.
Posted by: Arthur | September 1, 2008 3:37 PM | Report abuse
As long as we don't have one party running the govt we'll be alright...they are all morons, that's why they entered politics because they don't have the ability to run a business.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:37 PM | Report abuse
Any teen in Western Society is in Danger of getting pregnant. I am father of a teenager and pray to God every day for her safety and security. I sympathize with Palin family. Now my problem is with Republicans. Their family values are in gutter. McCain had sex with other women while he was married to his first wife. Newt Gingrich was sleeping with his secretary while his wife on bed with cancer and the list goes on. In fact Republicans are no better than Democrats in family values but they are hypocrites. Their example of moral values is reflection of the society and corrupting at every level of their base. McCain should come forward and explain his behavior while he was being dishonest to his wife and tell American people that he represents a political party which is morally bankrupt and its values are hypocritical.
Posted by: Sunny Boy Colorado Springs | September 1, 2008 3:37 PM | Report abuse
I'm amazed (and scared) by how many Americans are blindly and rabidly devoted to right-wing Republicans.
~~~~
And I am scared that so many people are blindly and rabidly devoted to the leftist wing of the Democratic party.
~~
The hypocrisy is amazing. Bush and Cheney could be caught slaughtering puppies on the White House lawn and those folks would blog that the puppies were terrorists.
~~~~~~
Puppies aren't terrorist, kittens are silly.
~~~~
When did everyone get so mean-spirited?
~~~~~
I do not know, when did you liberals get so mean spirited?
Posted by: Kitten | September 1, 2008 3:37 PM | Report abuse
Surprise, surprise. Yet ANOTHER fundamentalist Christian hypocrite. Better "borne" yourself once more to rid you of this latest sin against God.
Posted by: No Surprise | September 1, 2008 3:37 PM | Report abuse
I still like her and she gets my vote!
Posted by: VAVoter | September 1, 2008 3:36 PM | Report abuse
Let's consider if the shoe were on the other foot. In Obama's world his daughter without troubling her parents or the campaign would be secretly spirited across state lines by an adult boyfriend or "concerned" school counselor where she could quietly get an abortion. The Obama's would not have to be at all involved, the campaign interrupted, not have to know their flesh and blood grandchild had just been dismembered, and their daughter wouldn't be punished with a baby.
Who's more real :the Ivy league educated, community rabble rouser or the self made working mother, with a special needs child, a union husband, a daughter who's made a mistake.
Posted by: Dan for Sarahcuda | September 1, 2008 3:36 PM | Report abuse
You can just imagine the howls that would be coming from the Republicans if the daughter of a Democratic nominee was pregnant and unmarried at 17! They would be talking about the lack of family values among Democrats, etc. The Republican spin meisters have been going at full tilt to tout how Pallin has more "executive" experience then Obama and Biden as Governer and "commander" of the Alaskan national guard. Lets see how they try to spin this one! Slogan FAMILY VALUES, THE EARLIER, THE MORE (if white and christian), THE BETTER!
Posted by: Michael R | September 1, 2008 3:36 PM | Report abuse
Lets see if we can make Sarah's kids laugh.
Funny Cats!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTasT5h0LEg
Ok I'm a Obama/Biden supporter and we love all God's children.
Ok if the above video didn't make you laugh. I'm not giving up ok. Lets try this -
Talking dogs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCYaw5tGYAs
Everything going to be alright ok.
Posted by: Cooday | September 1, 2008 3:36 PM | Report abuse
There should be someone willing to make a Monty Python movie about all this!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:36 PM | Report abuse
So much for abstinence-only sex education...
Posted by: Alex | September 1, 2008 3:36 PM | Report abuse
How old was Bristol when she engaged in sex and how old is the father: From the Law: The age of consent is defined as 16 years old, according to Alaska statutory rape laws. If a person who is at least 18 years old engages in sexual activity with a person who is 16 years old or younger, he or she will be charged with sexual abuse of a minor in the first degree. This charge is a felony in Alaska. And remember, it does not matter if you did not force or threaten the other person into performing this sexual act with you. It is still a crime under Alaska statutory rape laws.
Posted by: stagnew@earthlink.net | September 1, 2008 3:36 PM | Report abuse
Hahahahahahaha!
How stupid and narcissistic can one be?
5 months pregers Holling and you didn't notice. Whats wrong with you!?!
ROFLMAO!
Posted by: Silly Ex-pat | September 1, 2008 3:36 PM | Report abuse
Any teen in Western Society is in Danger of getting pregnant. I am father of a teenager and pray to God every day for her safety and security. I sympathize with Palin family. Now my problem is with Republicans. Their family values are in gutter. McCain had sex with other women while he was married to his first wife. Newt Gingrich was sleeping with his secretary while his wife on bed with cancer and the list goes on. In fact Republicans are no better than Democrats in family values but they are hypocrites. Their example of moral values is reflection of the society and corrupting at every level of their base. McCain should come forward and explain his behavior while he was being dishonest to his wife and tell American people that he represents a political party which is morally bankrupt and its values are hypocritical.
Posted by: Sunny Boy Colorado Springs | September 1, 2008 3:36 PM | Report abuse
How did this girl manage to get pregnant while home-bound with mononucleosis? The math just doesn't work for me.
Posted by: LisaKay | September 1, 2008 3:36 PM | Report abuse
To Greg, the marine who stated "the best leaders in America are rarely senior Military officers. I've worked side by side with high ranking officers, and beyond Colonel it's all politics and who you know that gets you ahead, it has NOTHING to do with your abilities as a leader," a couple points.
First off, eveyrone's aware of the rivalry between the Marines and the Navy. So stuff it, jarhead, with your nonsense about Naval aviators. They're a breed apart. I had to laugh... the marine who lambastes Annapolis. And then expects to be taken seriously.
And on that last point, second and more importantly, Greg, what do you think the Presidency is about? It's politics, pure and simple. It's figuring out ways to get other people, some of whom you don't trust, don't like, and most of whom didn't vote for you considering it's the world, to work with you to achieve benefit for the United States. It's all friggin politics, Greg.
Posted by: Not a Jarhead | September 1, 2008 3:36 PM | Report abuse
There are hundreds of pressing needs in this country and none that I'm aware of will be effected by one girls pregnancy. We need to have an electorate that cares about issues not some young girls issue. To see this much response over something that says nothing about putting food on the table or men and women in harms way makes me sick. we have two candidates neither is pure as the driven snow and I don't care. Just figure where you want to go and vote for the guy who will get you there. but first you need to know where you want the country to go. and this contributes nothing to that question.
Posted by: ease99 | September 1, 2008 3:36 PM | Report abuse
It's a political issue because of Palin's stances on abortion and sex education. If the pregnancy is a "private" matter, so is the choice to have an abortion! Don't have it be the government's choice!
Posted by: Fred | September 1, 2008 3:36 PM | Report abuse
In my opinion, this just adds to her experience of knowing what it feels like outside the world of politics. Balancing career and personal life is not easy to do, especially with the spotlight on you. However unfortunate, it is a reality that many, many, parents face everyday. Perhaps this will give her insight on seeking solutions to ever-growing problems of teenage pregnancy.
Posted by: jast | September 1, 2008 3:35 PM | Report abuse
I have news for you people. This is her daughters SECOND pregnancy and Sarah was NEVER prego with a 5th child. So where was the marriage for the first pregnancy of Bristol?
Posted by: You have been lied to | September 1, 2008 3:35 PM | Report abuse
MCain - Palin '08
It's OVER
Posted by: kushka53 | September 1, 2008 3:35 PM | Report abuse
I don't think you should try to compare this girl to Chelsea Clinton. You are leaving yourself open to some nasty comments and I don't think any child of a candidate should be subjected to nasty crap just because their parents are running for office. Show some respect...to the kids if nothing else.
Posted by: kelly | September 1, 2008 3:35 PM | Report abuse
Greg, you ARE the man.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:35 PM | Report abuse
This is a story with no political relevance. It is simply the media's attempt to lash out against pro-life people. The girl is a teenager, after all, and is not a candidate for office. Nonetheless, I encourage the Palins to take heart: what the abortionist media is totally hysterical, righteousness is close at hand.
Posted by: Mark | September 1, 2008 3:35 PM | Report abuse
And while America focuses on two women's wombs, our (Bush-McCain) economy continues to go even further downhill.
Posted by: Stuart Herman | September 1, 2008 3:34 PM | Report abuse
I agree. People's families should be off limits. But official's behavior is not. And the American people are entitled to their opinions.
Sarah Palin and John McCain have shown grossly poor judgement. And that's what this election is all about!!!
We need people who are more than what they say. We need true leaders.
Posted by: Tough2Name | September 1, 2008 3:34 PM | Report abuse
Funny Cats!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTasT5h0LEg
Ok I'm a Obama/Biden supporter and we love all God's children.
Ok if the above video didn't make you laugh. I'm not giving up ok. Lets try this -
Talking dogs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCYaw5tGYAs
Everything going to be alright ok.
Posted by: Cooday | September 1, 2008 3:34 PM | Report abuse
Some of you truly amaze me. Let's get the stones out and throw them at the poor girl. Then again, I guess the fact that she is pregnant means that she is getting punished. After all, Obama would not allow his daughters to become punished.
So according to some of the enlightened ones out here, a woman has no business outside of raising a family if she has children. And with a grandchild in tow, even less. BTW, let me enlighten some of you that she does not have 5 children that she is raising. Her eldest is a soldier in the U.S. Army. During my Army days, the Army did not take too kindly to having mom around the barracks.
After reading comments the last few days from Democrats about Sarah Palin, I am pulling my membership out of the party. It definitely is no longer the party of tolerance. Far from it.
Posted by: Anthony | September 1, 2008 3:34 PM | Report abuse
She's a Maverick??? Give me a break. She's an over-achiever(can't help but wonder about her upbringing)who is not there for her kids which is becoming more evident every day. The only comparison between her and Hillary is that they're both females. I love the way the Republicans are putting a spin on everything including Bush and Cheney not attending the convention. There have been rumors for weeks that Cheney was not going to attend and God Forbid that Bush should show up because there wouldn't be ANYTHING good they could say about him. Can you list any of his accomplishments during the past 8 years? And if you think this is coming from an Obama supporter, you're wrong! The only reason there is such a big deal about the VP candidates, is because both Presidential candidates lack the experience and ability to govern this country.
Posted by: Christy | September 1, 2008 3:34 PM | Report abuse
Just an observation.. it's interesting how most of the hateful comments about this are from men. What's the matter, you taking advantage of the Palin being an easier target because she is a conservative woman so you can show your real hatred towards women?
Posted by: proud woman | September 1, 2008 3:34 PM | Report abuse
Cherie,
Palin has more executive than the man who is running for president on the Democratic ticket.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:34 PM | Report abuse
I'm amazed (and scared) by how many Americans are blindly and rabidly devoted to right-wing Republicans.
The hypocrisy is amazing. Bush and Cheney could be caught slaughtering puppies on the White House lawn and those folks would blog that the puppies were terrorists.
When did everyone get so mean-spirited?
Posted by: Eddie, New Orleans LA (well, Jackson MS) | September 1, 2008 3:34 PM | Report abuse
we are going to win and one day Palin will be the first woman, mother and grandmother to serve as President of the United States.
Posted by: loserdems | September 1, 2008 3:34 PM | Report abuse
I am a former Republican --- Mr. Bush changed my mind for me by 2002 --- who was more than willing to come home and support John McCain. But not now. Senator McCain's judgment has become too questionable in too many areas. He's wrong about the war, wrong about the economy, wrong about oil, and very wrong about Mrs. Palin (Harriet Meiers comes to mind). And while he is right that Mrs. Palin's pregnant 17 year old daughter should not become a campaign issue --- it is, however, a valid topic for discussion under the heading of "family values" --- the game is over for him if that is merely the first of several shoes to drop. Sadly, the Senator is looking like he is eight years past his sell-by date.
Posted by: Formerly Republican Ben | September 1, 2008 3:33 PM | Report abuse
This soap opera is bewildering. Let's suppose the McCain decision to pick Palin goes just as the McCain camp says it went. McCain learns that Palin's 17-year old daughter is pregnant and says what? "No problem! The American media, a goodly slice of whom slopped the people with swift-boating and Obama the Muslim, will certainly deal with your daughter's mistakes with compassion, nuance, and understanding. And the people, they will respond maturely and compassionately, saying to themselves, 'There for the grace of God/Odin/spaghetti monster go I.' Your daughter Bristol is undoubtedly perfectly prepared to deal with the media circus – or at least she better be, because you Sarah, 22-month Governor of a single-congressional-district state, are so much more qualified than Kay Bailey Hutchison (for example), that you simply must run."
Posted by: Tim | September 1, 2008 3:33 PM | Report abuse
Info,
Yeah, this makes her look human indeed. Sadly, it makes her look like the white trash that fill up the local news here in Southern Appalachia. They're REALLY human.
Posted by: Jones | September 1, 2008 3:33 PM | Report abuse
Dan Quayle was right. Me getting pregnant on TV started this whole thing.
Posted by: Murphy Brown | September 1, 2008 3:33 PM | Report abuse
BREAKING NEWS
NEW AUDIO TAPE OF PALIN CHIEF OF STAFF SURFACES!!
http://www.gov.state.ak.us/audio/FrankBaileyCDaudio.mp3
(good stuff half way thru tape)
The tape, between her chief of staff, and public safety director PROVES Palin QUILTY of trying to get her ex-brother-in-law, (a state trooper) FIRED because he divorced her sister.
In the tape, Palin chief of state quotes PALIN as asking WHY the trooper has not been fired.
PALIN, currently under investigation by bipartisan group of Alaska legislators, faces IMPEACHMENT, if found guilty of attempting to get trooper fired.
PAILIN TO BE DEPOSED, UNDER OATH, NEXT WEEK.
The Family Court Judge who heard the divorce case said Palin was on a "vendetta to get the Trooper fired"
MORE DEVELOPING...........
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:33 PM | Report abuse
How about "Accessing....Bill Clinton's infidelity"?? (what a list of those, hehe) If you are going to make headlines be FAIR and BALANCED. Back off and leave her alone.
Posted by: John | September 1, 2008 3:33 PM | Report abuse
I am a special education teacher and work with high needs students (Autism, Downs etc..) Since when does having a disability make you less of a person or a burden?
Posted by: Teach | September 1, 2008 3:32 PM | Report abuse
are a majority of you nay sayers the same that refuse to criticize Edwards when he announced he was running for President with his wife having relapse of cancer and he is paying an aid that he is sleeping with? He denies it then says didn't happen until his wife was in remission- boy that certainly makes it ok- now who is the father to this kid?
As a parent I know and understand a teenager can get pregnant- it happens to all types of parents- if you don't know someone that it has happened to then that probably is because they chose to kill the baby to prevent the "shame" What a great statement to make about their values-
Posted by: Andy C | September 1, 2008 3:32 PM | Report abuse
Had this been Obama's daughter, the Repub Right Wingers would have said "you can take the blacks out of the slums, but you can't take the slums out of the blacks." Obama, however, told the press that "families should be off limits." That's the difference between someone with class and a party that revels in its trailor-trash mentality. This Republican ticket is beginning to look like a sit-com. Art Buckwald would have loved writing about this one. He loved Carter's beer-swilling brother and Amy's tree house. But this is much, much better.
Posted by: Abarafi | September 1, 2008 3:32 PM | Report abuse
Apparently republican girls can have all the unprotected, pre-marital sex they want as long as they get married at the end. I wonder if Bristol ever really planned to marry the baby's father or she's being forced to do it for political reasons.
Posted by: KiwiLatino | September 1, 2008 3:32 PM | Report abuse
dear outraged,
maybe it's b/c jesus hung out with ho's and gangstas himself. religious conservatives hated him back then; inflexible liberals like you hate on him now.
you just can't stand it when neocons do anything right, and that shows how pathetically partisan you are. but please, continue heading to trader joe's to recycle your "peace + love" canvas tote.
Posted by: joy | September 1, 2008 3:32 PM | Report abuse
As a long time Republican I am apalled that our party has taken the attitude of winning at all costs. even at the cost of the well being of our armed forces. Bottom line she is not ready of fit to be Commander in Chief.
Posted by: eric | September 1, 2008 3:32 PM | Report abuse
You libs aren't voting for her anyways - what do you care.
I would think you pro choice hippies would love the fact that she is keeping the child.
Posted by: Clowns | September 1, 2008 3:32 PM | Report abuse
@Nancy -- you aren't getting it.
Palin can't run on experience because she really doesn't have any, so she must run on her values and her character. And it appears she may have serious character flaws that bring her actions into stark contrast with her values.
Posted by: cherie | September 1, 2008 3:32 PM | Report abuse
What about the mono this gal was supposed to be recovering from?..This whole story just gets more and more creepy.
Posted by: :-) | September 1, 2008 3:31 PM | Report abuse
Hillary couldn't control her husband, and she was within one of Bill's pubic hairs of being the presidential nominee. Did anyone suggest she should be disqualified?
Posted by: Confused | September 1, 2008 3:31 PM | Report abuse
I read through all these comments and, while I see a lot of hateful and hypocritical Obamanics seething, I can't find a single legitimate criticism of Sarah Palin with respect to her family's situation. I suspect that's because not a single legitimate criticism can be raised in this situation. It's nobody's business but those immediately involved.
Seventeen-year-old females have sex. Sometimes they get pregnant. Sometimes they have babies. Sometimes they get married. Goats eat grass. So what does any of this have to do with Barack Obama voting for FISA or promising to expand George W. Bush's taxpayer-funded faith-programs scheme or failing to propose universal health care?
Obamanics, you have foisted upon the public a loser. Please don't attack children to distract people from your stupidity.
Posted by: Andrew Austin | September 1, 2008 3:31 PM | Report abuse
It's ironic that the same people who had so much to say abut Jamie Lynn Spears mother's parenting abilities can rationalize Bristol's mother. If 'mother-of-five' is part of the reason I'm supposed to vote for McCain then her parenting skills on the table. If it turned out Sasha was a biter in pre-school we would have heard about it.
If she's 'going to get married' why isn't she already? If McCain knew about the pregnancy why didn't they introduce Bristol as 'an engaged daughter'?
As for the DWI, forget-about-it, ancient history.
Posted by: Civilian | September 1, 2008 3:31 PM | Report abuse
OBAMA: BACK OFF!!
Politico's Carrie Budoff Brown reports: At a press avail in Monroe, Mich., Barack Obama on Palin: "Back off these kinds of stories."
"I have said before and I will repeat again: People's families are off limits," Obama said. "And people's children are especially off-limits. This shouldn't be part of politics. It has no relevance to Gov. Palin's performance as a governor and/or her potential performance as a vice president. So I would strongly urge people to back off these kinds of stories. You know my mother had me when she was 18 and how a family deals with issues and teenage children, that shouldn’t be a topic of our politics."
Sorry Senator. I respectfully, but strongly disagree with your position. Palin's position on choice puts her squarely into the personal family life of women--including the personal life of their children, spouses and boyfriends.
She would force women back into the alleys and dirty holes to obtain an abortion on demand. I believe that is a woman's right and I value it greatly. You don't take such liberty with others' privacy. She does and what's good for the goose and good for the gander!!
She wants into other people's private family lives. She gets other people into hers. The issue of choice is beyond party loyalty. It is a woman's fundamental right. As an ardent pro-choicer, in this one instance, I strongly, but respectfully, disagree with your position!!!!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:31 PM | Report abuse
The sheer ugliness and hatred expressed by many on this blog makes me weep. I guess our culture has devolved to this level of squalor in its discourse. I'm still all for free speech but this disgusting display reminds me of the passage in "Lord of the Flies" where the children are all chasing the little boy with intent to kill him.
Posted by: Colleen Powers | September 1, 2008 3:31 PM | Report abuse
Old no, not our self-righteous Republicans. Don't tell me Mrs. Palin's 17 year old daughter is pregnant. This only happen to poe folk and buck-wild celebrities. McCain didn't know this young lady was pregnant and he's a lie if he say he did. I personally don't care, it's a personal problem the Palin's have to deal with. Mama/Grandma appears to have her hands full, where in the
h-e-double-l is she going to have time to serve as VP of any country? Hold-up she's got to find out what it is a VP does, where Georgia is, and the difference in Iraq and Iran. She's chasing down 18 million of Senators Clinton's supporters and possibly dealing with an alcholic spouse. She hadn't finish with that former brother-inlaw of hers yet. I don't pity or envy her.
Posted by: Lewania | September 1, 2008 3:31 PM | Report abuse
This is no laughing matter. I can only imagine the embarrasement and sense of failure that Sarah Palin, must be feeling. Certainly, it is commendable that her daughter elected to have the baby, as it appears to be much easier to have an abortion. I don't know that I would have accepted the VP RNC candidacy though. It's just too much to take on all at the same time, but she must know what she's doing. I cannot -- should not -- judge her or any other teenager or family, such as the Spears Family, because this is a very tough situation to handle. You may raise your kids in the church (or out of it) and not have a guarantee that your kids are going to make good decisions; you can only pray and hope that they'll do ok.
Posted by: AGT-R | September 1, 2008 3:31 PM | Report abuse
Exploitation?....I agree all the main stream media and hollywood are completely tainted with bias...
Posted by: Tamara Lillie | September 1, 2008 3:31 PM | Report abuse
Most pregnancies in the US are out of wedlock? Where are you getting your stats!!!!?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:30 PM | Report abuse
This is Harriet Myers. She has to step down. If he allows her to stay, every day calls into question his ability to select appropriate people for key offices--standing there, every day, before every audience and every camera, will be the evidence of his inability to make the most important judgments, in a way that every American can understand.
Posted by: Marie Stewart | September 1, 2008 3:30 PM | Report abuse
Actually the story started 3 months ago when some conservative bloggers questioned Trig's birth.
Posted by: NativeAlaskan | September 1, 2008 3:30 PM | Report abuse
Their going to have "BIG" trouble out of this child. Mom is forcing her to get married and live a lie -- and she is going to rebel like hell.
Posted by: ME | September 1, 2008 3:30 PM | Report abuse
Classic. Thank you Mike Huckabee for forcing this VP pick on the GOP.
Posted by: WakeWashington | September 1, 2008 3:29 PM | Report abuse
My friends, for five years, John McCain had no one to vet his decisions because he was a POW in Vietnam. Why should he start now?
Posted by: paul | September 1, 2008 3:29 PM | Report abuse
Just curious, if Chelsea Clinton had become pregnant while her dad was president what would the reaction have been from the left? Far kinder than what Palin's daughter is receiving.
Unfortunately teenage pregnancy happens all the time.
In response to Rob C " I don't want the right telling us have to live our lives." Well RobC I also do not want the left to tell me what I can and cannot do with my life.
Posted by: CAW | September 1, 2008 3:29 PM | Report abuse
The only person who was made a fool was you by John Mccain.
--------
No political inpact.
Dems are looking to even the playing field after being made fools of one day after their national convention!
Posted by: Prediction | September 1, 2008 3:24 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:29 PM | Report abuse
Scott: We'd like to see Obama's original, certified birth certificate from Kenya--uh, I mean Hawaii. He hasn't proved beyond the shadow of a doubt that he's a natural-born American.
If we find it's true that his then sixteen-year-old mother gave birth out of country, he isn't a natural-born citizen at all. If one parent is a foreigner, the other must have been a citizen for at least 10 years, 5 of which were after his or her 16th birthday.
Posted by: Julianne | September 1, 2008 3:29 PM | Report abuse
"What would those voters think of this candidate now if she were a democrat?"
Wouldn't care, just like we don't care about this.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:29 PM | Report abuse
Parents should teach their kids to keep their zippers zipped and their legs together.
Posted by: Hillbillies | September 1, 2008 3:29 PM | Report abuse
This is another poor decision from a doting old man who's lost touch with the current American desires and needs. Mccain has made a major blunder choosing a woman who displays nothing more than "TUNDRA TRASH." Sarah Palin is just that "pale" in comparison to Obama and Biden!!!! I can assure you that Senator Obama and Senator Biden are preparing their inaugural speeches as I blog about this ludicrous vp selection!!!! ha ha he he obama and biden will a b riden to the whitehouse in January!!!
Posted by: obama & biden thank u palin and mccain | September 1, 2008 3:29 PM | Report abuse
Sounds like Juno. Only it's Juneau.
Posted by: Elrod | September 1, 2008 3:29 PM | Report abuse
During the Clinton era the media and Republicans stayed away from Chelsea Clinton. Even during the just-completed primary season, in which Chelsea played an active campaign role and actually narrated her mother's biography at the Convention, the media and Republicans have said little. The John Edwards story languished for months until forced to the surface by the National Enquirer - and even now the mainstream meadia shows no stomach to investigate Edwards' obvious lies. Hell, during the 1992 New Hampshire, the New York Times actually refused to run a single story about Gennifer Flowers until running a bit about how OTHER media were covering the story!
But, O, how things change when there is perceived political advantage to the left from burrowing into the private life of a candidate's child! The squalid left-wing blogs get the message out. Then the path is clear for the "mainstream media" to report on the "fact" that the Left Wing Blogs are fulminating. Then Palin is forced to disclose and Obama says "it wasn't me," a denial which most people will take as about on par with John Edwards' claims not to be the father of the child he was viewing in a Beverly Hills hotel at 2:00 AM.
Now, we have the Washington Post assesseing the "political impact" of something nobody, including the Washington Post, should have been reporting in the first place. The New York Times has the story on page one ("New GOP Tumult" screams the Grey Lady who couldn't be bothered to notice Flowers or Edwards). So tidy. So liberal. So squalid. And like so many tidy, liberal, squalid efforts, most likely so counterproductive and self-destructive. And the Washington Post is THERE!
Posted by: Ken McKenna | September 1, 2008 3:28 PM | Report abuse
Sadly, Gov. Palin has thrown her daughter under this spotlight. This was predictable. Gov. Palin is on the record as saying she wouldn't support abortion even if her daughter were raped--so we already have her using her daughters as an example of her policies. One of the things that concerns me most about Sarah Palin is her support of "abstinence only" in our public schools. We have quantifiable information that teens have sex, and this sex results in unwanted pregnancies that change lives. I need, as a voter, to have these stark differences debated. Does Palin now get a "pass" on her extremist stance--simply because her daughter is pregnant as a result of it? Does she get to cry "uncle" when reporters ask a question they would have asked regardless of this pregnancy? Finally--here is an issue I would pose to a male or female candidate. Sarah Palin must have been warned by the McCain campaign that this would be front page news, and that her daughter would be dogged by it. There were many good women McCain could have chosen as running mates. I'm just one person, but I would have turned down the opportunity to protect my family. But that is my sense of what "family values" are about.
Posted by: Nancy | September 1, 2008 3:28 PM | Report abuse
1. This only makes Palin more relative to the majority of American people. The fact that she CAN run her family, abide by her morals, AND govern Alaska is truly a testament to her self-reliance.
2. The Washington Post has no right to document this as a "political issue." Simply put, they are trying to sway unknowing voters through the use of personal attacks on said person.
This, in effect, causes the Washington Post to lose all credibility in my book?
Are they scared to talk about relevant issues, or what?
Posted by: Exploitation? | September 1, 2008 3:28 PM | Report abuse
Sarah Palin stated she believes God chose her to have a baby with Down's Syndrome. If she was educated, she'd know that having a baby at age 44 means a 1 in 40 chance of the baby having Down's. It's like driving drunk and saying God chose me to hit that bridge and kill my passenger...
Posted by: Bad Decision | September 1, 2008 3:28 PM | Report abuse
I fail to see how a pregnant daughter is the fault of her mother or father. I grew up in up in an extremely conservative home, attended conservative private schools with classmates who were taught abstinence both at home and school. Several of my friends had children out of wedlock. A result of their choice, not their parents. As a parent, you can simply teach and guide your children to do what is right. As a free willed child, you make your own choice as to what you will do with what you were taught. If you are a parent then you will find it easy to understand that you love your children no matter what, even if you do not agree with their choices. You will help your child deal with the consequences of their action, but this does not mean you approve. I applaud Sarah standing by her daughter even though this is obviously not a situation she may approve of.
Posted by: jr | September 1, 2008 3:28 PM | Report abuse
Ginger- "I happened to stumble on this site after a phone call from my friend since she knew I love a good fight :) This, however, should not be a fight at all. After reading some of these posts, I'm just floored. Palin is now a bad mother because of her daughter's decision?"
No she is not a bad mother because of her daughters decision, she is a bad mother because of HER decision. The decision that her political aspirations and her own self aggrandizement take precedence over the needs of her 4 month old special needs son, and over the needs of her teenage pregnant daughter. She is a bad mother because she is selfish and self serving when she should be self sacrificing and placing the needs of her children above her own. Do you think she is the savior of the US and that there is not someone, anyone, immensely more qualified to be GOP VP than her? Come on, anyone, including myself, is as qualified to be VP as she is. Her responsibilities lie at home, not in telling the rest of us how to run our families! I am a Libertarian and I am insulted for all the immensely qualified women candidates that McCain passed over in favor of this nobody simply because she is a woman. It is insulting! She is an insulting pick!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:28 PM | Report abuse
I thinks its funny how if this had been on the Obama side the Republicans would have had a field day with this news today. It is a family matter, but does anyone remember when President Clinton had his bad day? The Republicans wanted to lynch him, that was a family matter, The Republicans will do and say whatever to get their way.
Posted by: michael | September 1, 2008 3:28 PM | Report abuse
The majority of comments that have judged Ms Palin and her daughter's pregnancy are nothing extraordinary. This is to be expected, it's inherent in most humans to react as displayed in these useless, jealous, hateful responses. To be victims, judges & punishers are all we really know and care about.
Posted by: Alim Ali | September 1, 2008 3:28 PM | Report abuse
The next surge in hot topic will include:
How well McCain has kept his cool, especially when so many pundits and critics have charged time and again about his temper. Is the lid too tight as the pot boils?
The real maverick may actually conclude that he will vote for Obama. Not only that, but he will announce it boldly.
Posted by: O.P. Neon | September 1, 2008 3:28 PM | Report abuse
You people who think that Sarah Palin's staying home would have made a difference are dead wrong. We don't follow our teen age children day and night. Families have problems and this one is no different.
As for Obama, he will be the gentleman and will not make this an issue. It may be harder to keep his surrogates under control.
Let the campaigns continue and leave the kids out of it.
Posted by: Nancy | September 1, 2008 3:27 PM | Report abuse
Looks like to me Sarah Palin isn't as good of a mother as everyone stated. Sure you all want Sarah Palin to be VP of the USA. She can't keep track of her own child let alone being able to help run the USA.
Who's your DADDY LOL
Posted by: Frank | September 1, 2008 3:27 PM | Report abuse
As a former U.S. Marine that served during the first gulf war from 1988-1992 it sickens me to see those portraying themselves as "active duty soldiers" actually believing Mccain is more qualified to be president then Obama.
Give me a break. The guy was fed with a silver spoon, went to Annapolis and his father was a senior officer who ensured his silver spoon fed boy made it through Annaplois.
A NAVY PILOT is no more capable of being the president then this soccer mom hes brought to the table.
The best leaders in America are rarely senior Military officers. I've worked side by side with high ranking officers, and beyond Colonel it's all politics and who you know that gets you ahead, it has NOTHING to do with your abilities as a leader.
Obama has years of experience in the Senate and knows full well how the political arena runs the world. I will sleep much better at night knowing his finger is on the trigger instead of some old maverick and his soccer mom side kick.
Posted by: Greg | September 1, 2008 3:27 PM | Report abuse
I feel bad for her daughter, I am more intersted in what Palin has done. They have some info on her at Veep Peek, About some scandal or something. Thats what people should be talking about. http://www.veeppeek.com
Posted by: Dave | September 1, 2008 3:27 PM | Report abuse
Ginger;
How about personal responsability? Corner stone of conservativisim?
Can you teach your children that?
How about reproductive health?
GEtting married as a senior in highschool is a good role model?
Republicans need to run RUN RUN away from this as fast as they can this is unbelieveable--
The religous right with Palin are going to destroy the party, forgett the election
Posted by: Abalony | September 1, 2008 3:26 PM | Report abuse
Already the GOP and its puppets are screaming that it's a "personal matter" and shouldn't be political. I think that when the daughter of someone who insists on "abstinence only" sex ed turns up pregnant and that that person wants to promote that same failed policy for everyone else's children that it is a political matter.
Posted by: McCain is a panderer | September 1, 2008 3:26 PM | Report abuse
Let's forget the mud slinging and focus on our Great Nation the USA and the needs of the people and the country. God Bless America,John Mc Cain for President and Sarah Palin for Vice President.
Posted by: Jon | September 1, 2008 3:26 PM | Report abuse
When the religious right put Character at the top of their agenda then YES those who disagee have every right (and will) point out the hypocrisy that is shown when the world closey examines their own character.
We are the voting public who are sick of the righteous hypocrisy and we, not Obama, are speaking up. Deal with it.
Posted by: JohnUSA | September 1, 2008 3:26 PM | Report abuse
Obama/Biden. McCain/Palin. Doesn't matter. There's no right answer. Write in Hillary/Edwards!
Posted by: vote_smart | September 1, 2008 3:26 PM | Report abuse
Palin got me hooked up on this election. What is it about her?
Get used to it guys, Its Palin all the way
Obama who?
I think McCain never dreamed, he'll media Cat5 storm blowing his way. Someone Up there has had the last laugh.
Posted by: vic | September 1, 2008 3:26 PM | Report abuse
Ann Dunham was 17 when she was pregnant with Barrak. She also was not married at the time.
Posted by: Echo of StarryPerdun | September 1, 2008 3:26 PM | Report abuse
The mud-slinging and name-calling in these comments only serves to demonstrate how pathetic American political culture is. The kid made a mistake. She is dealing with it responsibly.
(that said - if the Dems had a woman on the ticket who had returned to work 3 days after giving birth and had a pregnant teenage daughter, the GOP faithful would be having a field day!)
Move along. Address the issues.
(though a teenage mother living in the Whitehouse with her baby [I will believe in the marriage thing when it happens] could have an impact on how teenage pregnancy is perceived and dealt with)
Posted by: JJ | September 1, 2008 3:26 PM | Report abuse
I agree with the other bloggers, leave the family alone...anyone with common sense will see that it's just another example of Republican hypocricy.
I'm a Hillary supporter; however, I will now support Obama. Just as Hillary stated in her awesome speech, were you for: equal pay, the environment, healthcare, etc...or were you for me? This election is bigger than one person!! I support her causes and Obama does too...so don't let bitterness lead you down the wrong path and voting for someone just because of their gender. We all know the old cliche' so, don't bite off your nose to spite your face. Look at what the McCain/Palin ticket stands for and determine whether this country can withstand another 4 years of McBush. I don't think my conscience would allow me to rest easy again if I voted for this ticket just because there is a woman on it. We will have our turn, it's just going to be postponed!
Posted by: redneckgirl | September 1, 2008 3:26 PM | Report abuse
The religious right, pro-family values crowd loves to shove their "goodness" down everyone's throat. Now that Sarah's daughter is knocked up, the public is told that it is a "family matter" and the public be damned. When you're on the political big stage, nothing is off limits if you don't practive what you preach. The Palins are a bunch of back woods hill billies, nothing more and nothing less.
Posted by: Axeman | September 1, 2008 3:25 PM | Report abuse
The typical Obama-Nazi Socialist Democrat cheap shot attacks against the children and the spouse of McCain's VP Sarah Palin is actually a good sign of things to come. It means that the Socialist Dems are getting desperate and that it's slowly but surely dawning on them that Barack Obama will probably get his clock cleaned big time come November in the general election by President John McCain and Vice President Sarah Palin. Get your crying towels and the excuses ready lib Obama-Nazi's, you'll need them on November 5th.
Posted by: madhatter | September 1, 2008 3:25 PM | Report abuse
I can't wait to see the Palin & Biden debates!
Palin has acquired the political nickname "Barracuda" My guess is she will knock him out of the park. Palin has a 80% approval rating by the Alaskan population.
Now the underage daughter ordeal: Most pregnancy's in the USA are out of wedlock. Where have you nay sayers been?
What you Dems need to worry about is the Federal lawsuit NOW on the Docket! The lawsuit that questions 5 points regarding obama's citizenship, passports from Indonesia and more. Oh, lest we forget his mother was unwed and pregnant by a rumored married man. Go Palin!
Posted by: hawkeyee | September 1, 2008 3:25 PM | Report abuse
I am a democrat and very proud of it. However I do not feel that Palin should be judged so harshly on this. As a mother of only two myself, I am learning that I can not solely be held responsible for the choices my children make. Take yesterday for example. I have been working alot ( I am a single mom and I go to college full time as well). My daughter decided to get her mommy to stay home with her,instead of go to work, she would swallow a penny. My 5 year old is very bright and knows much better than this. There comes a time as a mother that we have to trust that our children will make the right decisions in life based on what we have taught them. I have talked with my daughter plenty about choking hazards and putting small things in her mouth. However, how was I 2 know that I shouldn't let her go into her brothers room where she would find the penny and get the idea to swallow it? I don't condone a mother working as much as I do, however some things just have to be done. The same goes for Palin, she trusted her daughter to make the right decisions based on obvious family values. Even though that didn't happen, it doesn't mean she didn't try, or that she fails at running her family. Some things just have to be done, and I believe having Palin on the Republican ticket, is definately one of those things. She works hard, and if anything, this seems to make her more human. If only half the good things she's done could compare with this one small flaw in her establishment. It's sad that we as Americans, have picked at it so harshly.
Posted by: Stephanie | September 1, 2008 3:25 PM | Report abuse
Palin can't run her own family how is going to run the country? Palin doesn't know if her daughter has 1 and 1/2 kids or 1/2. Who is running that house? Blind ambition doesn't let small things like (lack of decency and respectability)get in the way. What does the "Religious Right" have to say about this absurdity? When she gets indicted under the current investigation, maybe McCain can get Bush to Pardon her.
Posted by: Fareed H. Ansari | September 1, 2008 3:25 PM | Report abuse
One of the first posters above wrote: "Let's check Palin's stats to date; she has a 4 month old child or grandchild with special needs, a pregnant 17 year old daughter who is going to marry the father of the child (as if that makes everything OK and acceptable!), she's in the midst of an ethics investigation, her position on the "bridge to nowhere" changed repeatedly (for/against/for etc), and she ran a 527 group for Senator Ted Stevens ...."
So -- that's all you got on her? You got nothing. To be fair, about 6 months ago Obama revealed that there was some miniscule lapse in his past, and he had rectified it. I don't remember if it was an unpaid traffic ticket, or an unreturned library book; but whatever it was, it wasn't much. I thought it was very revealing that if this was all he had to "confess," he's quite a guy. These are all people of principle, on both tickets. Move on to the policy issues, and leadership ability; there's nothing worth talking about as far as personal morality on either ticket.
Posted by: Brent in Lowell | September 1, 2008 3:25 PM | Report abuse
Congratulations! The Hilly-Billies just came into town (Washington). LOL. Mama & Papa, and their five kids, with the 17 year old daughter, who never completed high school and has no means to raise a child on her own, pregnant, and to top it -a shot-gun wedding to commemorate the occasion.
The Palins are a walking advertisement for whole range of social issues plaguing the US: teenage pregnancy & adolescent sexual responsibility, abstinence before marriage, and the important need for children to focus on their education (completing at least high school), getting a job and being able to economically, physically, and emotionally support and raise a family BEFORE starting a family mindlessly. Maybe the Palin daughter thinks that becoming a teen mother is OK, because her mother is in position of power, and will be able to provide the economic support for her and all her future children for years to come, but this is not the case for hundreds of teens who become parents, when they are not emotionally, financially and physically ready, and realize that their actions have not only hurt their own future and their family, but the entire society, when they abandon these kids after giving birth to them or abuse them because of frustrations and inability to cope with parenthood at such young ages.
Posted by: anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:25 PM | Report abuse
The Alaska age of consent laws are unique. The age of consent in Alaska is 16. This is the age at which an individual may consent to have sex with someone over 18, legally, in Alaska. It applies both to heterosexual and homosexual acts.
So the question is, how old is the father?
Posted by: LawAlaska | September 1, 2008 3:24 PM | Report abuse
I do not think the news about the pregnancy of Briston Palin is relevant to the election. The fact that Ms. Palin is not even remotely qualified for the job that she has been selected is frankly a reflection on Senator McCain's judgment. This is a very reckless decision on his part to put Ms. Palin in this position of the first in the line of succession of a 72+ year old cancer survivor with war injuries.
Senator McCain claims to put country before politics, but this decision is clearly one of politics before country! So much for the empty rhetoric.
Posted by: cincinnati, oh | September 1, 2008 3:24 PM | Report abuse
No political inpact.
Dems are looking to even the playing field after being made fools of one day after their national convention!
Posted by: Prediction | September 1, 2008 3:24 PM | Report abuse
The greatest irony is that McCain chose her *because* of her evangelical credentials--to woo the "values" voters.
What would those voters think of this candidate now if she were a democrat?
Posted by: Marie Stewart | September 1, 2008 3:24 PM | Report abuse
Thank God (I hope I'm allowed to say that) there are no more unmarried expecting 17 year olds out there. The morons who wrote some of these replys might not be able to take it. By the way... what was Moral Bill Clinton's ( and I actually like the guy)voting record in congress? Oh yeah, he wasn't in congress and didn't have a voting record. Perhaps the girl shoud get herself a coat hanger and take care of business the good old left wing way. I believe it is actually called murder. Leave us go forth and elect a demi at all cost.
Posted by: JoeK | September 1, 2008 3:24 PM | Report abuse
I DEMAND that the McCain camp show PROOF that Obama & Liberal blogs have spread rumors & attacks on this issue.
I am TIRED of them playing politics with us, our troops and every other important matter.
This needs to be exposed once & for all so people can see how they ATTACK liberals by accusing them of things they didn't do.
As USUAL the MEDIA won't ask the questions or investigate because this is their soap opera moment which they THRIVE on.
AGAIN, I DEMAND THAT THEY PROVE THAT LIBERALS & OBAMA ARE BEHIND THIS.
I will give $1000.00 to anyone who can prove that before today liberals were talking about this & spreading lies.
Posted by: Mark | September 1, 2008 3:24 PM | Report abuse
Wow, those moose burgers didn't work well for the kids. Anyway, she shouldn't force the girl to get married, just because she had a one night stand.
Posted by: Ray | September 1, 2008 3:24 PM | Report abuse
Obama reported as saying, "Back off these kinds of stories" and that families are off limits.
Fair enough, and I hope we don't see Bristol Palin attack stories.
But... Sarah Palin's decisions as a parent ARE pertinent because she casts herself as a family values candidate. It is perfectly legitimate to ask how she gibes what she espouses to her life actions.
It goes to the character question. If we can't see that she consistently executes on her values, then we also may not be able to believe that she'll be consistent on policy... and Republicans should be scared of that.
Posted by: cherie | September 1, 2008 3:24 PM | Report abuse
It appears that the Republicans have successfully exploited Hurricane Palin to divert attention from the shortcomings of the Convention...
Posted by: ArchHero | September 1, 2008 3:24 PM | Report abuse
Just goes to show how abstinence only education is working.
Posted by: cillann | September 1, 2008 3:23 PM | Report abuse
I feel bad for her daughter, I am more intersted in what Palin has done. They have some info on her at Veep Peek, About some scandal or something. Thats what people should be talking about. http://www.veeppeek.com
Posted by: David | September 1, 2008 3:23 PM | Report abuse
Scott, I fully agree with you that McCain might have anticipated that there are no private family matters in an Presidential election campaign. I imagine because his less that exemplary marital history hasn't hurt him, he underestimated the potential for a woman with rigid social views to be targeted by other women for her daughter's trials. The "morality" compared to adultery is small potatoes, not so the health issue of Bristol being so tender of years in light of doctors nowadays recommending women wait until their 20s for the rigors of pregnancy.
Posted by: jhbyer | September 1, 2008 3:23 PM | Report abuse
Do you crazy Republicans not see the complete insanity behind this announcement today?
"No, my teenager could not possibly be the mother of Trig because she's 5 months pregnant with another kid!"
I mean, COME ON! Do you REALLY expect us to believe Sarah Palin is fit to be President of the United States???
And, if Obama is paying people to come up here and post stuff, I think I speak for everyone up here in asking where our checks are and how much it's going to be for.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:22 PM | Report abuse
Way to spend time with your family there, Palin... most stay-at-home moms have very little respect for you right now... not because you work but because you work too much and ignore your children; I seem to remember Chelsea Clinton never being pregnant... how about that?
Posted by: HillaryHappy | September 1, 2008 3:22 PM | Report abuse
Her daughter is an adult by any real world standards.
Mind your own shallow business.
Posted by: Palin for VP | September 1, 2008 3:22 PM | Report abuse
Where was Bush (GW) when McCain needed him today?
The silly hurricane Gustav took the President away, who could have smirked his way through this announcement and energized the crowds, instead. America has produced no one better than GW to let go everything and have no responsibility. Don't involve Cheney in this, else he will produce evidence naming Al Queda or Iran.
McCain has yet to prepare for debating ISSUES (for America) and not the domestic stuff.
Posted by: O.P. Neon | September 1, 2008 3:22 PM | Report abuse
it was ok for mccain to call obama girls "brats" these are kids, well mannered at that. some of you people have crossed the line with bigotry. if it was obama girls who get pregnant it would be all over the news cycle for days. the repig are hypocritical. mccain did not vet palin the more i find out about her i do not like her not because her daughter is prego any girl can make a mistake. her issues. to compare her to obama is ridiculous hes a harvard constitutional lawyer & president of his law review commutative experience 12 yrs in legislature & senate & foreign affairs. you cannot compare someone who graduated with a degree in journalism to that i don't care how you try to spin it. a soccer mom is not qualified to be vp. mccain has poor judgement and makes me wonder how he would handle affairs w leaders of other countries if he's not detailed enough.
Posted by: dmb | September 1, 2008 3:22 PM | Report abuse
This is a private matter in so far as it effects the Palin family. Where this becomes a public matter is that Palin and the Conservative Right believe that all American’s must share the same beliefs as they do by force of government. That makes her private matter a very public issue. DEMonstrate's post (September 1, 2008 1:44 PM ) above is right on target. I think it is the press's responsibility to ask the hard questions and have Palin explain why the rest of America should have to live their lives and guide their children the same way she has. Palin, her family, and the decisions they have made are an amazing example of the consequences of Conservative and her religious "values". I do not share her beliefs, although I would protect her right to exercise her beliefs. Where we differ is that she thinks she can force all American's by law to make the same decisions she has made.
Posted by: FJ | September 1, 2008 3:22 PM | Report abuse
Obama on Palin
Politico's Carrie Budoff Brown reports: At a press avail in Monroe, Mich., Barack Obama on Palin: "Back off these kinds of stories."
"I have said before and I will repeat again: People's families are off limits," Obama said. "And people's children are especially off-limits. This shouldn't be part of our politics. It has no relevance to Gov. Palin's performance as a governor or her potential performance as a vice president. So I would strongly urge people to back off these kinds of stories. You know my mother had me when she was 18 and how a family deals with issues and teenage children, that shouldn’t be a topic of our politics."
On charges that his campaign has stoked the story via liberal blogs:
"I am offended by that statement. There is no evidence at all that any of this involved us," he said. "Our people were not involved in any way in this, and they will not be. And if I thought there was somebody in my campaign who was involved in something like that, they would be fired."
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0908/Obama_on_Palin.html
Posted by: kreuz_missile | September 1, 2008 3:22 PM | Report abuse
now pregnant (again) daughter was conveniently out of school with mono for eight months while mom was pregnant with trig.
Posted by: tom | September 1, 2008 3:21 PM | Report abuse
Way to spend time with your family there, Palin... most stay-at-home moms have very little respect for you right now... not because you work but because you work too much and ignore your children; I seem to remember Chelsea Clinton never being pregnant... how about that?
Posted by: HillaryHappy | September 1, 2008 3:21 PM | Report abuse
How long can the McCain campaign stall on discussing the real such the as the the resurgence of terror in Afghanistan and Pakistan, the Iraqi Security Agreement, the national debt? From Phil Gramm's insult that anyone who questions the economy being a whiner to nominating a v.p. who is more colorful than she is charismatic, the Straight Talk Express seems to be taking a detour from the issues.
Posted by: profebc | September 1, 2008 3:21 PM | Report abuse
Hillbilly backwoods trash and she is second on the republicans ticket???????????
-------
First, we find out Sarah Palin and her husband opted to have a baby at her age knowing full well the risks of having a Down Syndrome baby after age 35. Then they parade the child's disability around like a pity cry. I feel so sorry for that child having to be raised by ignorant, exploitive parents. Next, we find out that her daughter has been living in sin and is now pregnant. I suppose there will have to be a maternity wing added to the White House to accomodate all the Palin offspring, illegitimate and otherwise.
Posted by: Mark Bohannon | September 1, 2008 3:18 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:21 PM | Report abuse
I see it's happy hour and everyone has had plenty of Hatorade.
Personal attacks, rumors. and someone elses opinions of any of the canidates is NOT going to change who I vote for.
The only thing I have read here (not all of you) is a bunch of crackpot, extremist commens, that are more personal opinion rather than fact.
Don't beleive everything you hear, do some research, vote, and stop the hatefest.............or you can beleive everything you hear/read, and just vote for whomever your friends, family, TV suggest, then you won't need to bother with thinking for yourself...............it's allways easier to be the sheep rather than the sheperd, which are you?
Posted by: Mike C | September 1, 2008 3:21 PM | Report abuse
Be carefull, WashPost, is gonna snatch anything that is truthfull and harmfull to McCain.
Posted by: Bobster | September 1, 2008 3:21 PM | Report abuse
How can Sarah Palin allow her daughter to be so publically humilited and exposed? Bland Ambition--she had a choice, and sacrificed the privacy of a 17 year old. How heartless, cynical & disingenuous; meantime all this mendacity goes on in God's name. Keep drilling Roe V. Wade, and screwing up your daughter's life.
Posted by: Repuking | September 1, 2008 3:21 PM | Report abuse
If a pregnant woman is on a plane for 8 hours even if she does her best job to hide it SOMEONE MUST HAVE SEEN SOMETHING!
Do you your job Cillizza and start calling every crew member and passenger on that flight and get to the bottom of this so everyone can stop speculating.
Posted by: Patrick | September 1, 2008 3:21 PM | Report abuse
[[Liberals saying a woman should stay home and take care of the children. Will wonders never cease! Democrats better leave Sarah and Bristol Palin alone with regard to the various pregnancy issues, or they will pay a price in November.]]
Oh, what an asinine comment. Liberals aren't saying a woman should stay home and take care of the children - we're just pointing out the hysterical hypocrisy of conservatives who have been saying this...when suddenly the GOP nominee is out trying to govern a state and now run for VP while her family so obviously needs her at home.
So, Sarah, how's that "abstinence only" program working out for your kids there?
Posted by: Ted | September 1, 2008 3:21 PM | Report abuse
It is bizarre that some people are decrying false rumors while simultaneously spreading their own.
Senator Obama's parents were married and then got divorced. Senator Obama's father had prior children with another woman, with whom he lived, but to whom he was not properly married. Senator Obama's mother did not know about that when she met, fell in love with, and married Senator Obama's father. Her father found about these other children in a letter from Senator Obama's paternal grandfather (I don't know if he told Senator Obama's mother at the time) and then he helped convince her that the last thing she wanted to do was go to Kenya. This is a tragic story, folks-- not something to salivate over.
I cannot imagine what Senator Obama's grandfather, Stanley Dunham, felt when he got that letter. His daughter was already married, already pregnant, and planning to go in a four or five years to Kenya with her new husband and child. Stanley Dunham must have been beside himself-- yet, he and his wife showed tremendous family values. They did not assault their son-in-law. They tried to persuade him to stay here with his family. After their son-in-law left, Senator Obama was raised to believe that his absent father was almost a hero by his grandparents and mother as a father who left on a mission to save Kenya-- not because of any lack of love for mother or child.
What is more-- none of this has any relevance to the man Senator Obama became, because he knew NONE of it until he was in his middle 20's, past the age of essential character formation.
Perhaps everyone should check for facts before spreading rumors. The press does love to titillate us-- if there is grist to a scandal, the press will find it. The facts about Senator Obama are readily available-- indeed, he even wrote a highly autobiographical book before he was in any elected office.
If some of you feel you must spread falsehoods because of your political ideologies, I ask those of you who Believe to REMEMBER that bearing false witness is against the 10 Commandments. I ask the rest of you to remember the Golden Rule.
Let's focus on the ISSUES facing our Country, for they are many, and they are complex. I know Senator McCain cannot keep straight from one day to the other what his own proposals are, but that does NOT justify anyone bearing false witness against another, especially against someone (Senator Obama's mother) who is no longer present on this Earth to defend her own reputation.
Posted by: Kim | September 1, 2008 3:21 PM | Report abuse
Sarah do us a favor and politely bow out of the VP nomination.
Posted by: Rose | September 1, 2008 3:21 PM | Report abuse
This woman scares the *** out of me, and it's not because her daughter's knocked up. It's because she'll be a heartbeat away from the presidency, and her ideas are terrifying. What qualifies her? She killed a moose and was Miss Congeniality?? Seriously, people, this is a joke perpetrated on you to get "Hillary votes." This is an amoral campaign that is willing to sell out the American people in order to win.
Posted by: Diane | September 1, 2008 3:21 PM | Report abuse
Gustav is taking all the media attention away from the fact that Palin was involved in some kind of trooper scandal, They have extensive info on her past and the scandal at http://www.veeppeek.com
Posted by: Ben Wright | September 1, 2008 3:21 PM | Report abuse
"If she is so pro-life; why was she not thinking of the life she put at such an enormous risk?"....
I'll say what a lot of us are thinking, but won't say... because Palin had an unconscious desire to complicate the baby birth's. She knew it had Down's Syndrome and her politics/beliefs didn't allow an abortion. So if the baby died at birth, she's guilt-free and special-needs-baby-free. I know that sounds ugly, but people are complicated creatures and unconscious desires can be expressed in odd behavior. I would say this of any woman, Dem or Repub, that was so callous during her labor when she knew it was going to be a disabled child. Classic psychology textbook stuff. There, I said it. Blast away.
Posted by: DogBitez | September 1, 2008 3:21 PM | Report abuse
And this was posted by an "Obama supporter". Right.
"Lets hope the media doesn't keep this story going for ratings.
This is a classic Rove tactic to blame Democrats. Classic Schmidt tactic to blame Obama's campaign.
By now the Media knows Obama do they now believe his campaign to drop to this level? You know better!
Now instead of hearing about the Republican convention and the issues the media will keep story in the news?
Its still Obama vs McCain!
Obama/Biden '08"
Posted by: Marie Stewart | September 1, 2008 3:21 PM | Report abuse
How about her revealing internet pics and my space page?
1. How about John McCain’s son in drug rehab at grey wolf treatment center in Port Townsend WA?
These folks are unstable—maverick means cant follow instructions, and does not play well with others---
This aint liberal issues these are conservative issues
I am soooo embarrassed by the conservative right-- The republican party has become the party of Britney Spears,
The party of Reagan? This is the best we have to offer?
Pure embarrassment it appears that Rupert Murdock was right this is going to be a landslide for the Dems... and I think they deserve it....
Posted by: Abalony | September 1, 2008 3:21 PM | Report abuse
DND: "Pro lifers don't see a child as punishment."
Nope, and since Palin opposes abortion in cases of rape and incest, one assumes she'd see the child of a teenager raped by her father as The Memento of a Wonderful Evening.
Posted by: mishi | September 1, 2008 3:21 PM | Report abuse
Whhaaa Whaaa Whhaaa. Is that the sound of one of the Palin baby's? Or is it the Republicans?
What a bunch of whiners the Republicans have become.
"We wanted to let you know the under aged daughter of our VP pick is pregnant with a child out of wed lock. We're telling you this because those mean ole' democrats keep saying bad things about 'baby-gate'. Whhhaaaaaaaaaa!"
Posted by: Stop crying already | September 1, 2008 3:21 PM | Report abuse
this is quiet funny. Abortion is so morally wrong in the eyes of palin and mc cain but pre martial sex is not. Pl do not call yourselves christians if u cannot live up to the moral standing of being a christian. Evangelicals please read the bible and live by it and stay out of politics.
Posted by: jay | September 1, 2008 3:20 PM | Report abuse
I'm still curious why people think the woman should stay home with the kids, but do not question Biden's decision to join the Senate when his wife died...he could have gotten a job near home as a lawyer..never enough of those.
Posted by: Curiouser | September 1, 2008 3:07 PM
I don't think Sarah Palin should stay home with her kids. She is obviously not a very good mother anyway, and her staying home would make no difference. She needs to take her family and go on the Dr Phil show, like that poor couple that had the pregnant teenage daughter did, so they can get their lives straightened out. Sending a mother home to her kids who so obviously lacks parenting skills, empathy and is so wrapped up in herself and her own self aggrandizement is not the solution.
Posted by: Karin | September 1, 2008 3:20 PM | Report abuse
Hope everything works out for Bristol. Parenting in this day and age is not easy. A real family crisis.
Posted by: Hoffmann | September 1, 2008 3:20 PM | Report abuse
There are bound to be some Eskimos living closer to Russia than Palin, does that qualify them too?
Posted by: Linda Ruth | September 1, 2008 3:20 PM | Report abuse
What part don't you people understand about "she's marrying the father" and "keeping the child".
Face it, you guys lost.
Obama needed to pick a women, not a Washington insider.
The snake oil salesman made fools of you all.
Posted by: Squirt me some tears | September 1, 2008 3:20 PM | Report abuse
I happened to stumble on this site after a phone call from my friend since she knew I love a good fight :) This, however, should not be a fight at all. After reading some of these posts, I'm just floored. Palin is now a bad mother because of her daughter's decision? Just doesn't make sense to me. As the mother of teenagers myself, you can only teach them...you cannot ram morals down their throats regardless of political affiliations. You can lead a horse to water, right? Would everyone have considered her a bad mother if she locked her daughter in the basement until she was 18 and then let her roam free? Would that have made her a better mom? Show me a parent that can control every thought and action of their teenager and you have a control freak who is unwilling to allow their kid to learn from mistakes.
Posted by: Ginger | September 1, 2008 3:20 PM | Report abuse
Treat Scrivener's prediction with the same accuracy as the many predictions of a Gore/Obama ticket (with Obama as the veep). The story states that Palin was candid about her daughter's pregnancy. Think, people. She'd be about 8 months pregnant in November. You think that would be hidden?
Also, as is noted in the story (do you actually read before posting Scrivener?), it is impossible for Palin's daughter to be 5 months pregnant now and have delivered in April. It's simple math.
Oh, and is there any chance of booting Outraged's comment? That posting goes way, way, way over guidelines for civil discourse. I'll be voting against the McCain/Palin ticket,
People in glass houses...
BB
Posted by: Fairlington blade | September 1, 2008 3:20 PM | Report abuse
As I understand it, Sarah also was pregnant before she was married. Why should we, then, cast any stones at the daughter? "Like mother, like daughter," as the saying goes.
Posted by: formerrepublican | September 1, 2008 3:20 PM | Report abuse
I can appreciate that if your child has a teenage prengnency, that it should not be construed that you don't have family values...but, then again, i don't preach family values to others.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:20 PM | Report abuse
Yes, Levi the confirmed baby's father is BLACK...I guess McCain's crew figured if you can't beat 'em, join 'em....right on!
Posted by: ucan'thandlethetruth II | September 1, 2008 3:20 PM | Report abuse
Enough of John McCain's politicking!
Clearly this is just a lame attempt to draw in the "Unwed Mother's" vote.
Does he think we're stupid?
Posted by: UncleSam | September 1, 2008 3:20 PM | Report abuse
Conservative evangelical Christians are biggest hypocrites. Despite their harsh judgement of others, research has shown that rates of premarital sex, divorce and extramarital affairs are same as the general population. I also bet their abortion rate is about as same as the rest of the country as well; they just hide it well. Sarah Palin is no hero for not chosing abortion, for such "chose" should not be available to anyone who would take it away from everyone else!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:19 PM | Report abuse
Imagine what the Cooperate Press would do this if Obama had a 17 year old unmarried daughter that was pregnant?
It is a different story for "abstinence only" fundamentalist. The press loves hypocrites.
Posted by: Lee in Minneapolis | September 1, 2008 3:19 PM | Report abuse
Her Daughter's second pregnancy. I totally believe the rumors that baby born in April is her daughters
Posted by: Anony,ous | September 1, 2008 3:19 PM | Report abuse
LET THE PUBLIC DO THE VETTING!
Perhaps FOX could air a reality show to pick a Palin replacement?
Posted by: parseccfm | September 1, 2008 3:19 PM | Report abuse
Nice mom to put your own ambition ahead of your teenage daughter's pregancy & all that surrounds that. As the mother of a 17 year old daughter I know how wrenching that would be for all concerned. But I digress...
Has anyone really looked at Sarah Palin's touted "executive" experience? Two years ago she was mayor of a very small town about the size of Truth or Consquences, New Mexico--around 6,000 people. Not much there. Now she is governor of less than two years of a state with a population about HALF the size of the city of San Jose, California. Do you think the mayors of those locales are ready for prime time on the national ticket and to be a heartbeat away from the presidency of this country? Is this putting country first for McCain--not to mention family--or ambition first?
Think about it...
Posted by: dmans | September 1, 2008 3:19 PM | Report abuse
Then why did they try to hide it? They lied to us while asking for our vote. Thats the bottom line. I personally don't care if the baby father is her father. I just don't think they should have lied about it.
---------
"This is the pro-life choice. The fact that people will criticize her for this shows the astounding extent to which the secular critics of the pro-life movement just don't get it. Those who criticize the Palin family don't understand that we don't see babies as a punishment but as a blessing. Barack Obama said that if one of his daughters made a mistake and got pregnant out of wedlock he wouldn't want her to be punished with a child. Pro lifers don't see a child as punishment.
Posted by: DBD | September 1, 2008 3:14 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:19 PM | Report abuse
What happened to the McCain's Other Daughter?
Posted by: Post American | September 1, 2008 3:19 PM | Report abuse
I'm a "lefty", but consider this a private matter and subject closed.
Hmmmm.......I wonder how the RNC would have handled a similar situation if it had happened to a Democrat....videos maybe, a Rush Limbaugh extravaganza perhaps...etc.
Unbelievable hypocrisy in "righty" world.
Posted by: Glen Holt | September 1, 2008 3:19 PM | Report abuse
OBAMA: BACK OFF!!
"I have said before and I will repeat again: People's families are off limits," Obama said. "And people's children are especially off-limits. This shouldn't be part of our politics. It has no relevance to Gov. Palin's performance as a governor or her potential performance as a vice president. So I would strongly urge people to back off these kinds of stories. You know my mother had me when she was 18 and how a family deals with issues and teenage children, that shouldn’t be a topic of our politics."
On charges that his campaign has stoked the story via liberal blogs:
"I am offended by that statement. There is no evidence at all that any of this involved us," he said. "Our people were not involved in any way in this, and they will not be. And if I thought there was somebody in my campaign who was involved in something like that, they would be fired."
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0908/Obama_on_Palin.html
Posted by: kreuz_missile | September 1, 2008 3:18 PM | Report abuse
Palin looks so human - the worst female American human who can ever be VP - bad parenting, anti-environment, abuse in power, and what does she know about foreign policy, taxation, international relations anyway ?
Am sending a better radio journalist who graduated with honors over to McCain because theres no way the Democrats would want a candidate like that.
By her minimal track record she embarrasses the University of Idaho !
Posted by: Paula | September 1, 2008 3:18 PM | Report abuse
Pro-Truth, it took a few days for this story to come out so that the McCain campaign could use a natural disaster as cover for their media dump. Simply shameful.
Posted by: John M. | September 1, 2008 2:56 PM
++++++++
John M., I'm soooo disappointed that the first woman candidate on a Presidential ticket since Geraldine Ferraro would put her daughter under the kind of scrutiny, which should be obvious to anyone with an iota of an idea on the nature of national-level politics.
I respect the McCain's decision not to parade Bridget around as part of their campaign. The Obama's while parading Malia and Natasha, have allowed them to be interviewed on national TV directly by reporters. In a way, this gives the both McCain's and the Obama's a kind of authenticity in their family lives, realizing political realities. I seem to recall that the Clinton's also hid nothing about Chelsea, even if they kept her away from the press. Same thing with the Bush's and their twins.
Why does this matter? Well, if we're now supposed to be focused on personal qualities rather than anyone's putative experience...then I'd like to vote for a ticket that shows good judgment and honor both in their professional and personal lives. Who I don't want to vote for is that person that I thought was so nice for years and even invited into my home, and then turned out to be hiding a bunch of skeletons and lying through their teeth to me.
The most repugnant thing is to try to have it both ways...not tell the truth and then parade your children around for political expediency. To hide something about your child to make yourself look better...That's worse than hiding something about yourself!
That's child abuse!!!
Sarah should go back to Alaska and take care of Bristol as she prepares to give birth to her grandchild. Why did she make her pregnant daughter sit and stand through all those rallies?
Posted by: Pro-Truth | September 1, 2008 3:18 PM | Report abuse
Abstinence-only education at work.
Posted by: A. Reader | September 1, 2008 3:18 PM | Report abuse
First, we find out Sarah Palin and her husband opted to have a baby at her age knowing full well the risks of having a Down Syndrome baby after age 35. Then they parade the child's disability around like a pity cry. I feel so sorry for that child having to be raised by ignorant, exploitive parents. Next, we find out that her daughter has been living in sin and is now pregnant. I suppose there will have to be a maternity wing added to the White House to accomodate all the Palin offspring, illegitimate and otherwise.
Posted by: Mark Bohannon | September 1, 2008 3:18 PM | Report abuse
Gustav is taking all the media attention away from the fact that Palin was involved in some kind of trooper scandal, They have extensive info on her past and the scandal at http://www.veeppeek.com
Posted by: Ben | September 1, 2008 3:18 PM | Report abuse
Ah. I guess she couldn't pull the wool over the public's eyes twice. Trig = Bristol's first son. Tsk. Of course no doubt she *would* have if the truth hadn't gotten out first. "6th pregnancy"? HA! Don't me laugh.
Posted by: applecorey | September 1, 2008 3:18 PM | Report abuse
Do as I say, not as I do. Not for me.
Poor choices = poor judgement. Not for me.
McCain/Palin. Not for me. Not for this country. Not this time. ENOUGH!
Posted by: Tough2Name | September 1, 2008 3:18 PM | Report abuse
What liberal blogs? I've been all over the web and I've never heard this, until they announced it and blamed the announcement on the liberals! Wow... what great spin!! The liberals made them do it! Pleeese. How about "the kid's pregnant and I don't believe in sex education." End of story.
Posted by: Lee | September 1, 2008 3:18 PM | Report abuse
Let's review:
-Palin is discovered to have a daughter with an illegitimate pregnancy
If this had been Obama, the right would have been screaming about ethics, poor parenting, poor judgment, and the inability to lead a family, nevermind a nation.
Instead, they say "Stop talking about it".
-Palin and McCain do not reveal this until rumors force them to.
If this had been Obama, the right would have been *screaming* about dishonesty, deception, ethics, lies.
Instead--we should "let it go."
-Palin is found, on tape, to demand the firing of her brother-in-law.
If this had been Obama? Troopergate revisited! Abuse of power! Return of the Clintons!
-Instead--"Just be quiet".
Can you spell panic? Can you smell it?
Posted by: Marie Stewart | September 1, 2008 3:17 PM | Report abuse
I just ask all you folks on the right to consider if you would have responded magnanimously if it had been announced this morning that Barack Obama's eldest daughter was pregnant.
Posted by: DG | September 1, 2008 3:17 PM | Report abuse
Let's check Palin's stats to date; she has a 4 month old child or grandchild with special needs, a pregnant 17 year old daughter who is going to marry the father of the child (as if that makes everything OK and acceptable!), she's in the midst of an ethics investigation, her position on the "bridge to nowhere" changed repeatedly (for/against/for etc), and she ran a 527 group for Senator Ted Stevens ....
Great vetting Senator McCain!
Why is it when the truth about people actually sees the light of day the Republicans call it "mudslinging"? Shouldn't people know all of the available facts prior to deciding who they want to vote for?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:17 PM | Report abuse
Don't vote for her then.
Goodbye...
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:17 PM | Report abuse
ROTFLMAO!!! This news combined with the news of Palin's husband's arrest for D.W.I. should put an end to McSame's campaign. Mrs. "Family Values" seems to be awash in sin, and yet she has the nerve to pretend to be righteous and right. Well, as far as I'm concerned, these people can put their "family values" where the sun don't shine because that's about what they're worth. This woman cannot even teach her 17 year old daughter right from wrong, and yet she would prance about with the gall to tell everyone about "family values". I knew McSame was insane the day his choice of this woman for the V.P. spot on the G.O.P. ticket was announced. But, I didn't realize how soon his lack of judgment and experience would be revealed to the world. Now, we all know, and all you McSame supporters can hide your heads in shame, as the senile, old man is given a fitting good bye party at the G.O.P. convention. Obama/Biden 08!!!
Posted by: caliguy55 | September 1, 2008 3:17 PM | Report abuse
I listened to a Southern Baptist Preacher in Plano, TX go on and on about Sarah Palin and her 5 month old child. Preaching from the pulpit of a church of 24000+ (that's 3 times the size of the city Sarah Palin was mayor of) in one of the most affluent areas in the Southwest, this preacher said a total of 5 words about John McCain and a 10 minute litany about Sarah Palin. The most surprising analogy of this "preaching" was that the Republicans are going to use this poor child born with a deformity in the same useless manor that they used Terri Schiavo. Talk about politicizing the poor, the unfortunate, the broken. And that's what's going to do the Moral Majority right wing fundamentalist Christians in. They can't keep from telling everyone else how to behave. It's as if they have this obsession with trying to teach morality instead of practicing it. Sad. Just sad
Posted by: Phillip | September 1, 2008 3:17 PM | Report abuse
Hey, you silly conservative fools. Family values starts with having sex out of wedlock. Who cares she is getting married when it comes to family values, that bus crashed 5 months ago. Just like Cheney and his gay daughter, so busy trying to mess with the lives of families across the Country, they let their own family and its (lack) of values shine. This is a disgraceful sin that you all are trying to "make better" by trying to make it a pro-life debate when there is not one there.
Posted by: Justice Done | September 1, 2008 3:17 PM | Report abuse
So much for the GOP using Palin to go after the social conservative wing of the party.
Let's face it... she and her daughter are just another in a long line of good, upstanding Americans that have had to "make a choice".
She and her daughter chose one way... Let's pray that those that choose another way will still be allowed the opportunity.
Posted by: Robb Swanson | September 1, 2008 3:17 PM | Report abuse
Face it, you can preach abstinence or birth control...but teenagers act impulsively and do not always practice what they preach.
I don't care that her daughter is pg. I like that she is keeping the baby.
I don't like the way they hid this beneath the hurricane. What else are they hiding?
As for Dems. being mean... all public figures are subject to scrutiny. I have heard Conservatives complain that Obama vacationed on a "private" beach. Give me a break.
If SP is as dynamic as she seems to be, it's a shame she didn't say "no". Stay home take care of her children for another four years. Gain more experience. Give the kids privacy. And, run for President in 4 or 8 years. It wouldn't be too late.
Childhood- and teen years are fleeting. The job of VP can wait.
Is it fair that a woman should wait while a man could go ahead and run without comment? No.
Would a man with this little exp. and no acting career even be considered? Not likely.
Yes, she has had executive exp. in a small town...and a state with the population of many cities in the mainland. LAUSD has a bigger population than Alaska and most likely a bigger budget to manage. Yet, you don't see people suggesting that the Superintendent run for pres. And he's an admiral.
In these elections we are not comparing apples to apples. The situations carry different weight.
Posted by: Jenn | September 1, 2008 3:17 PM | Report abuse
The level of misogyny from the Obama supporters since Palin got the nod has been extremely disappointing. In particular, two things keep coming up that, although they stop short of "She can't be vice president because she's a woman," would never be said about a man:
(1) She has five kids (including an infant) and therefore should not be VP. If Palin were male, would this be an issue?
(2) She was a beauty queen. I've heard this thrown around disparagingly quite a bit. ("McCain picked a *beauty queen* to be VP! He's clearly an idiot.") Again, would this be an issue if Palin were male (setting aside the fact that men generally can't be beauty queens)? Look at old pictures of the two presidential nominees from every election since 1980. McCain, Dubya, Kerry, Gore, Dole, Clinton, George H.W. Bush, Reagan, Mondale, Carter...in their younger days, they were all handsome guys (and Obama still is, since he's still in what many would consider his younger days). JFK was probably the pinnacle of male attractiveness, but you never heard people saying, "I can't believe we have a handsome former football player and war hero running for president!" I suppose that when it comes to politicians, masculine indicators of attractiveness are simply more acceptable to us than feminine ones. If you want to call Palin dumb (which I think is the insinuation on the beauty queen thing) then that's certainly your right, although query just how dumb someone not named "Bush" can be and still rise to be governor of a state. But please, lose the misogyny - not for my sake, but for your own. All it does is make you (and by extension, your candidate) look uneducated and sexist, and that doesn't really do any of us any good.
Posted by: Sigh... | September 1, 2008 3:17 PM | Report abuse
Hey realitychecker...
Your obama=osama thing is only funny in the sense that your astounding lack of orginality and your astounding abundance of racism and ignorance is almost comical.
Posted by: getreal | September 1, 2008 3:16 PM | Report abuse
Palin is exactly the problem with allowing women in executive positions. It is better to learn this lesson now. They are all incompetent, liars, inexperienced, overbearing, heartless, destructive, unfocused, emotional, irrational, disloyal, deceitful, greedy, covetous, petty, jealous, vain, etc..
She is the perfect VP choice for McCain. Please do not replace Palin before November!
Posted by: Independent | September 1, 2008 3:16 PM | Report abuse
Lots of speculation on Palin's motives here. Lots of free, unsolicited advice about parenting from dubious experts.
Palin is a member of Feminists for Life. I suggest looking at the FFL platform to learn what inspires and drives her.
Here's a good article on the subject: http://ncronline3.org/drupal/?q=node/1742
Posted by: Burton | September 1, 2008 3:16 PM | Report abuse
Like all in the conservative extreme, including those who are told to post here. They refuse to see the hypocrisy.
This woman touts her conservative values yet she has a daughter that is having pre-marital sex and now a child.
This shows more about her character than they want to admit. Her lack of commitment to parenting her child by her own standards means she fails in her role to be the voice for the religious right. Or maybe it really shows the hypocrisy that is deeply embedded in their cause. Say one thing, do another. Either way this does show that, yet again, she is willing to put her ambitions over her own family and values.
Posted by: JohnUSA | September 1, 2008 3:16 PM | Report abuse
Let's set aside the fact that the future of America has suddenly been reduced to an episode of Desperate Housewives.
Were this anyone else's daughter (Hilary's or Michelle Obama's), you right-wingers (including Palin) would blame it on nothing less than *horrible parenting*: a daughter getting pregnant out of wedlock at 16, a shotgun marriage at 17. You'd be *outraged* by the lack of family values. "Moral judgement begins in the home." "Children's actions reflect their parents morality." Etc. Look what happened, you'd say, while person who calls herself a mother was off selfishly trying to advance about her own ego with a political career. A *mother's place*, you would continue your shouting, is in the home, especially with 5 kids!
So, now that Palin will be running all over the country trying to promote her candidacy (and, in your dreams, running our country) who's going to step-up and take responsibility for raising A) Palin's 5 kids, especially her youngest child with Down Syndrome, and now b) Palin's granddaughter? The 17 year old kid (the one whose own parents failed to teach her to abstain or at least use birth control)? Remember now, it goes against your conservative family values to have a hired gun take the place of a mother. In fact, again, You'd cite this very case to illustrate why a mother should stay at home rather than be selfishly focused on her own ego.
Just imagine the constant thrashing you'd give Hilary or Michelle Obama as mothers in this situation!
Now suddenly you have to defend all those things against which you've been so vehemently opposed for so many years. Good luck with all your hypocrisies (or flip-flops as you've so happily called them in the past).
Posted by: patmac | September 1, 2008 3:16 PM | Report abuse
I want to know how is Bristol Palin isdifferent from the teenage sister of Britney Spears. It appears McCain has a problem with how Britney is but no problem with any of these girls getting pregnant out of wedlock.
The first female veep will go down in history as someone who is very loose and who has no family values.
Posted by: John | September 1, 2008 3:16 PM | Report abuse
OBAMA: BACK OFF!!
"I have said before and I will repeat again: People's families are off limits," Obama said. "And people's children are especially off-limits. This shouldn't be part of our politics. It has no relevance to Gov. Palin's performance as a governor or her potential performance as a vice president. So I would strongly urge people to back off these kinds of stories. You know my mother had me when she was 18 and how a family deals with issues and teenage children, that shouldn’t be a topic of our politics."
On charges that his campaign has stoked the story via liberal blogs:
"I am offended by that statement. There is no evidence at all that any of this involved us," he said. "Our people were not involved in any way in this, and they will not be. And if I thought there was somebody in my campaign who was involved in something like that, they would be fired."
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0908/Obama_on_Palin.html
Posted by: kreuz_missile | September 1, 2008 3:16 PM | Report abuse
Obama's mother was 18 when she had him...and got married after she was pregnant.
Posted by: VAVoter | September 1, 2008 3:16 PM | Report abuse
"That's funny, Ann Dunham was 17 when she was pregnant with Barrak, what a coincidence....she also was not married at the time."
Yeah, but as far as I recall, no one in her family was running for higher office on a family-values plank at the time.
What's REALLY funny is the level of level of holier-than-thou hypocrisy on the right.
On second thought, not funny at all.
Posted by: mishi | September 1, 2008 3:16 PM | Report abuse
Lets hope the media doesn't keep this story going for ratings.
This is a classic Rove tactic to blame Democrats. Classic Schmidt tactic to blame Obama's campaign.
By now the Media knows Obama do they now believe his campaign to drop to this level? You know better!
Now instead of hearing about the Republican convention and the issues the media will keep story in the news?
Its still Obama vs McCain!
Obama/Biden '08
Posted by: Bobby | September 1, 2008 3:16 PM | Report abuse
As every woman knows...you must keep your own house in order.
Sarah Palin's daughter, Bristol is a child fornicator and it has been endorsed by her mother.
This flys in the face of Dr. James Dobson's Focus on the Family Doctrine: Babies Come from God — They Should Be the Result Only of Marital Love. In their words: "Sexuality is a glorious gift from God to be offered back to Him either in marriage for procreation, union and mutual delight or in celibacy for undivided devotion to Christ. "
She is claiming to be the champion of Evangelism - "Palin Pick Causes 'Elation' among Evangelical Leaders" (http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/435468.aspx) ...."conservative Evangelical leaders know all about her and think the World of her. They like her. She has been involved and active with many Christian organizations."
Posted by: Koko1920 | September 1, 2008 3:15 PM | Report abuse
If Bristol were pregnant five months ago, why didn't she immediately marry the father of her child? If the father is over 18 years of age, technically, under Alaskan law, he committed a sexual felony punishable by possible incarceration.
Now, a couple of points about Sarah Palin. She stands to the right of George Bush (very little space there!) and yet in the Biblical arena of the man of the marriage being the head of the family as Evangelicals tout, she accepts the VP nomination though her challenged baby boy is only a few months old. Family values?
Next, she announces the first day of the Republican Convention that her 17 year old unmarried daughter is pregnant. What mother would put her political aspirations ahead of her daughter's and her grand child's notoriety in the WORLD? This pregnancy and birth will be scouted by the news media from this day forward.
My feelings go out to Trig and to Bristol both who have lost their top priority with their mom.
Posted by: Kat | September 1, 2008 3:15 PM | Report abuse
As best I can tell there's not much more to do in Alaska besides sex and stealing, so that explains the mom & daughter for me.
Posted by: booboo | September 1, 2008 3:15 PM | Report abuse
Ah....... don't you like the GOP hypocrisy. Smell the fear.
Posted by: John Smith | September 1, 2008 3:15 PM | Report abuse
The Left Wing Liberal Idiots have really come out of the woodwork on this one.
Posted by: don f | September 1, 2008 3:15 PM | Report abuse
My parents didn't believe in God, but they knew well to educate me to only have sex with the person I get married to, after I get married. They educated me to plan carrier and pregnancy so that we could afford enough time and money for children and it worked for all 4 of us children and my mother was working and raising kids. Admit, she wouldn't know how to kill an animal for sports. So Bible is nothing if you don't put it in practice.
Posted by: Ana | September 1, 2008 3:15 PM | Report abuse
Forgotten in a few days time.
The only people concerned were not going to vote for her anyways.
Posted by: 34478 | September 1, 2008 3:15 PM | Report abuse
PALIN: CAMPAIGN FIRST, FAMILY LAST (for accepting the VP position knowing she has a special needs infant at home and a pregnant teenager about to be exposed to the viciousness of the press and public).... MCCAIN: CAMPAIGN FIRST, COUNTRY LAST (for selecting such an under-qualified VP when this country is in peril). What an atrocious ticket.
Posted by: DogBitez | September 1, 2008 3:15 PM | Report abuse
As every woman knows...you must keep your own house in order.
Sarah Palin's daughter, Bristol is a child fornicator and it has been endorsed by her mother.
This flys in the face of Dr. James Dobson's Focus on the Family Doctrine: Babies Come from God — They Should Be the Result Only of Marital Love. In their words: "Sexuality is a glorious gift from God to be offered back to Him either in marriage for procreation, union and mutual delight or in celibacy for undivided devotion to Christ. "
She is claiming to be the champion of Evangelism - "Palin Pick Causes 'Elation' among Evangelical Leaders" (http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/435468.aspx) ...."conservative Evangelical leaders know all about her and think the World of her. They like her. She has been involved and active with many Christian organizations."
Posted by: Koko1920 | September 1, 2008 3:15 PM | Report abuse
I can't even imagine what these hypocrites would be saying if it was the other way around.
They still say Obama is a Muslim. Screw them, tear her and her whole white trash family apart. They are phonies anyway.
----------
Sorry, but McCain should have mentioned this when he introduced Palin as his VP.
Republicans should be careful with their efforts to blame Democrats for this revelation. This is not news that can be hidden away and if it were a Democrat's daughter, Conservatives would be on every cable show decrying their lack of family values. They would not be treating this issue with the respect and request for privacy that they give to one of their own.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:12 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:15 PM | Report abuse
If Sara Palin is so pro-life, please explain to me what she was doing flying to Texas one month prior to the expected high-risk birth of her Downs Syndrom baby?
She had birthed 4 children previously; so there is no way she did not know the serious dangers she was exposing that unborn child to by waiting to get immediate medical attention. She first gave a speech and then traveled more than 10 hours by plane (on which no one noticed or was notified that a passenger was in labor)to Janeau, then drove another hour to give birth in a less equiped hospital than what was available in Texas or Juneau; and if that is not enough, she then then returned to work just 72 hours later.
If she is so pro-life; why was she not thinking of the life she put at such an enormous risk?
This is not a conservative vs. liberal issue. Regardless of her beliefs and or politics; she's seriously flawed, and anyone who believes others is as well.
Posted by: John | September 1, 2008 3:15 PM | Report abuse
I see that the 'abstinence education' that Palin enthusiastically promotes is about as effective as the other policies she and McCain promote. This teen pregnancy is such a sad situation that could so easily been prevented with some sensible sex education - which Palin opposes!
Posted by: J. Collins | September 1, 2008 3:15 PM | Report abuse
Maybe father is some black guy!!! Woooohh, wait, there are no black people in Alaska. Oh well, maybe it's Eskimo.
Posted by: DefJam | September 1, 2008 3:14 PM | Report abuse
and the hope to add her on the ticket was what again? attract the moral majority & the conservatives? She sure is doing a wonderful job at that!
Posted by: Darius | September 1, 2008 3:14 PM | Report abuse
"This is the pro-life choice. The fact that people will criticize her for this shows the astounding extent to which the secular critics of the pro-life movement just don't get it. Those who criticize the Palin family don't understand that we don't see babies as a punishment but as a blessing. Barack Obama said that if one of his daughters made a mistake and got pregnant out of wedlock he wouldn't want her to be punished with a child. Pro lifers don't see a child as punishment.
Posted by: DBD | September 1, 2008 3:14 PM | Report abuse
Funny thing is Republicans and Democrats are completely interchangeable.
Democrat in light for controversy, Republican tears Democrat to pieces in all ways possible.
Republican in light for controversy, Democrat tears Repub. to pieces in all ways possible.
You are all the same and should all log off. Srsly.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:14 PM | Report abuse
Morons deserve morons. I cannot believe the junk written here by some people. We as Americans are electing a leader who is supposed to represent the best behavior of us. As a leader that is an expectation. I do not think having a 17 year old mom shows us leadership in a family. Yes, it may not say anything about Pahlin's ability to lead, but other things say it all. She is completely inexperienced and has the gaul to call running a 10,000 people town as "executive experience" to prepare her to be next in line to be President. Pitiful. And on top of that she is up for corruption charges in Alaska. Or did people not know that? Also, it is a completely asinine saying that this baby story makes Pahlin more palatable because she "seems more human". Yes, if we were comparing her to the guests on Jerry Springer Show. But when we need to keep some real standards on who we elect, all it shows is that she was not a good mother. She did not teach her daughter some basics, or at least how not to get caught. Sad...... I am going to enjoy McCain and Pahlin burn like the clowns they are.
Posted by: John Smith | September 1, 2008 3:13 PM | Report abuse
Palin should really sit this one out.
Posted by: GDP | September 1, 2008 3:13 PM | Report abuse
I cannot believe all the naivete on this board -- all of you who believe that somehow this is the work of the Obama campaign. Are you kidding? You don't think this story would have surfaced otherwise? You don't think there have been good reporters digging into Palin's past all along? All of you who want to present this as a hatchet job by the Obama campaign are merely perpetuating the true religion of the Republican party: disinformation and propaganda. To blame Obama for this is to deflect the truth that McCain showed an unbelievable lack of judgment, not about Bristol, but about Sarah. He met her once or twice - brought her on even though she is CURRENTLY under investigation for abuses of power. People are saying she's not ready to be president should something happen to McCain because of all her inexperience. I say McCain is not ready to be president because of his horrendous lack of judgment.
But again, my point is the Obama campaign has better things to do than feed this story to the media - especially when, I know, there were journalists working all kinds of angles on Palin since Friday. The only way you deluded ones can tie Obama to this trainwreck is if you can get his DNA and prove that he is the father. Oh, wait, I think Sarah already told the nation who the father is. Never mind.
Posted by: gimmeabreak | September 1, 2008 3:13 PM | Report abuse
SEND THIS LINK TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW
http://www.gov.state.ak.us/audio/FrankBaileyCDaudio.mp3
Audio tape, of Palin's Chief of Staff, pressuring the Public Safety Director to FIRE a state trooper, who happens to be Palins ex-brother in law.
During divorce proceedings, Family Court Judge accused Sarah Palin of a "vendatta" against the ex-brother in law.
Good stuff on tape is half way thru.
Pass it along.
Posted by: Bob | September 1, 2008 3:13 PM | Report abuse
The most important thing we do in life is raise our children. It is more important than any job, any position, any office. They are our gifts to the world. They are the charge that God has given us.
Palin has not figured it out yet. She thinks all this other stuff is more important than her children. Teenagers want to be loved. If they don't get it from home, they will seek it out else where. I had one child, and he kept me very busy until he left for college at 18. The emotional, cognitive, and spritual needs of children require a great deal of attention and sacrifice from parents.
If my child were in this situation, no way I would get involved in a VP run. If I had a newborn special needs child, no way I would be involved in a VP run, the governorship, or anything else. If I had five children, they would be the center of my life.
All of this with a alcholic husband, instead of being with his family now, is defending his championship title for dog sleigh survial in the Alaskan wilderness.
McCain sure knows how to pick them.
Posted by: Effy | September 1, 2008 3:13 PM | Report abuse
haha what a slore, that abstinence education worked out real well for her.
Posted by: Rachel | September 1, 2008 3:12 PM | Report abuse
Keep up the hate-filled comment Dems...it will only reinenforce the coming McCain/Palin victory. Typical of your arrogance you underestimated Dubya and you are underestimating McCain.
Posted by: Michael | September 1, 2008 3:12 PM | Report abuse
If she can't even control her own teenage daughter, I have little faith that she can govern a country.
Posted by: Debra | September 1, 2008 3:12 PM | Report abuse
It's strange to read this thread. Teenage pregnancy happens a lot in America and even more around the world. Why is this illegal, a sin? I would think that it helps Palin relate even more to our day to day challenges. I had a child when I was 17 and love that child and that child is now 17 and a great student. My life couldn't be better, I am now an attorney and practice in Dayton. What' wrong with everyone? I forgot. I am an African American and an Obama supporter.
Posted by: Lisa Gibbons | September 1, 2008 3:12 PM | Report abuse
Just because her daughter is pregnant doesn't mean Sarah didn't raise her correctly. Kids constantly do things that their parents have repeatedly told them not to do. Wake up people...you'd be hard-pressed to find a 17 year old in America NOT having premarital sex! It doesn't matter how they are raised or how much supervision they have...they will find a way. Believe me, I'm a high school teacher.
Posted by: give her a break | September 1, 2008 3:12 PM | Report abuse
I feel sorry for Bristol on so many levels,as a mother. She needs her mother, right now, but she's on display, she's 17 and she's expected to do "the right thing" by marrying the father of her child. Problem is, who we are at 17 is not who we are at 25. I cringe when I see her holding her little brother on stage trying to cover her baby bump.
I am truly frightened for my country at the thought that Sarah Palin could a heart beat away from running our country with absolutely no experience in foreign affairs or national security, a woman with a journlism degree, six years experience as mayor of a small town with a population of 7,000 and 1 1/2 years experience as governor. The world is watching us. They already think us idiots. We should be more forcused on real issues. I didn't think things could get any worse. Dear god, it really could.
Posted by: Danelle | September 1, 2008 3:12 PM | Report abuse
Obama is wrong, this is relevant because it plays against the package that Mccain is trying to sell on them as a wholesome family. I can tell you, Obama doesn't have to do a thing and he knows it. This is in fact news and tabloids will beat it into the ground as well as uncover a lot more I am sure. As the saying goes. "It now has a life of it's own".
-----------
OBAMA: BACK OFF!!
Politico's Carrie Budoff Brown reports: At a press avail in Monroe, Mich., Barack Obama on Palin: "Back off these kinds of stories."
"I have said before and I will repeat again: People's families are off limits," Obama said. "And people's children are especially off-limits. This shouldn't be part of politics. It has no relevance to Gov. Palin's performance as a governor and/or her potential performance as a vice president. So I would strongly urge people to back off these kinds of stories. You know my mother had me when she was 18 and how a family deals with issues and teenage children, that shouldn’t be a topic of our politics."
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:07 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:12 PM | Report abuse
Sorry, but McCain should have mentioned this when he introduced Palin as his VP.
Republicans should be careful with their efforts to blame Democrats for this revelation. This is not news that can be hidden away and if it were a Democrat's daughter, Conservatives would be on every cable show decrying their lack of family values. They would not be treating this issue with the respect and request for privacy that they give to one of their own.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:12 PM | Report abuse
This is a woman who boarded a plane 9 months pregnant (stupid) after her water broke (insane, batsh#t insane), or she faked a pregnancy (not likely given the latest news). I would rather she faked the pregnancy as at least that did not put the child at risk. Everyone knows you dont fly when 9 months pregnant, and when your water breaks, you rush to the hospital as you are now at risk for infection and likely to give birth soon.
Posted by: Bob | September 1, 2008 3:12 PM | Report abuse
She's almost 18 - making you people idiots...
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:11 PM | Report abuse
So much for free speech. Bye
Posted by: Xo4 | September 1, 2008 3:11 PM | Report abuse
"Gov. Palin is an individual who, for all her good qualities and ambitions, doesn't appear to have put her family first in her decision."
What a load of tripe to say that Palin didn't or should have put her family first.
Did Obama put HIS family first? Did any person who ever ran for President put his family first?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:11 PM | Report abuse
Congratulations and Best Wishes to the Palin family!
Posted by: Mr. & Mrs. J. A. Semilian | September 1, 2008 3:11 PM | Report abuse
Actually this wont affect my vote at all.
I think the Trooper scandal is a much bigger deal then this. http://www.veeppeek.com But at the same time, Its keeping McCain and Palin in the News
Posted by: Danny | September 1, 2008 3:11 PM | Report abuse
I just don't get how the so-called "religious right" can stomach a marijuana-smoking, lesbian-friendly, retard-producing, bastard-grandchild-delivering, secret-concealing, civil-union-condoning, Eskimo-partnered-with, woman-head-of-household feminist. One would have thought that someone would have said, "Go and sin no more." Could it be that they are just using "religion" for their own, twisted ends? How sad.
Posted by: Outraged | September 1, 2008 3:11 PM | Report abuse
Joyce: "LIfe is sacred."
Um, does that include the hundred-thousand Iraqi civilians who've died as a result of Dubbya's misbegotten war? Or is life only sacred before it leaves the womb?
Posted by: mishi | September 1, 2008 3:11 PM | Report abuse
Is Palin's oldest son married?
Why does she call Palin her mother in law? Something fishy is going on here: Note picture of girl's "brother" who just happens to be named, uh, "LEVI!!" So we might assume that this is the Levi in her statement then. Then why does this girl call Trig her brother? It's all very confusing.
http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewImage&friendID=63524358&albumID=0&imageID=9866485
"Bristol and the young man she will marry are going to realise very quickly the difficulties of raising a child, which is why they will have the love and support of our entire family. We ask the media, respect our daughter and Levi's privacy as has always been the tradition of children of candidates,"
I still think she wasn't pregnant last April.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:11 PM | Report abuse
"Gov. Palin is an individual who, for all her good qualities and ambitions, doesn't appear to have put her family first in her decision."
What a load of tripe to say that Palin didn't or should have put her family first.
Did Obama put HIS family first? Did any person who ever ran for President put his family first?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:10 PM | Report abuse
That's funny, Ann Dunham was 17 when she was pregnant with Barrak, what a coincidence....she also was not married at the time.
Posted by: starryperdun | September 1, 2008 3:10 PM | Report abuse
FUNNY!!!!!
-------------------------------------------
so who's the daddy her father or her brother?! Someone needs to rent a copy of "Juno", I mean "Juneau"....
Posted by: ucan'thandlethetruth | September 1, 2008 3:04 PM
Posted by: LOL | September 1, 2008 3:10 PM | Report abuse
Probably the ones that are the most critical
are ones that have had problems in their own
families. I am 70 and can tell you that most
of the people I know are not guarded from having the same problems or some things simular. Life is not always fair or comes out the way we planned. I would be very surprised if many go through life without error and could in good judgement cast the first stone. Understanding and forgiveness are what is called for. For the most part those complaining are blind to their own life and family.
Posted by: Jack | September 1, 2008 3:10 PM | Report abuse
The average American family has "problems" of one kind or another. This just makes Palin more normal to small town America. Shame on us for even discussing this issue. Her daughter and her family have enough to deal with without the rest of us acting as judge and jury. People in glass houses should not throw stones.
Posted by: C Newton | September 1, 2008 3:10 PM | Report abuse
This is a stupid story. We know very well, any politician who goes around talking about values is a big hypocrite. This is well documented. It's inconsequential other than the fact that people keep voting on these non-issues.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:10 PM | Report abuse
Are you so desperate for news? Reading some of the comments following this post reminds me of the wide range of decency in global Internet traffic. Your post and some of these comments are a great example of how low some will stoop.
Posted by: Kay B. Day | September 1, 2008 3:10 PM | Report abuse
This woman REALLY wants to be vice president. I accidentally watched this rumor-story flower on the internet over the past day. Whether her daughter is pregnant or pregnant again, there are still strange anomalies about Sarah Palin's ambitions which aren't explained by this newest revelation.
Here is her story of April 18, 2008, from the same Alaskan TV station where she once worked as a sportscaster. It's about how her water broke at an oil conference in Texas, just prior to her giving a keynote address to Cheney's inner circle. She claims to have gotten her physicians's approval to get on an airplane and fly back to Alaska while in labor with a Down syndrome baby. I am certain there is no doctor who ever said that, so we know she tells whoppers at need. http://www.ktuu.com/global/story.asp?s=8194634
She reports that she was asked, at the conference, if she was willing to be VEEP. She said yes. I guess she got carried away. She put her kids up on stage like that, for her own agenda, so she could demand sympathy on their behalf, and my heart indeed aches for them.
Posted by: Mary Porter | September 1, 2008 3:10 PM | Report abuse
Ladies and gentlemen- please stop calling Trig a "Downs baby". He is a baby with Down Syndrome. He's a person with a disability, but he's a person first.
Posted by: Mom2Lila | September 1, 2008 3:10 PM | Report abuse
this is insane. what kind of mother leaves her infant child, her unwed pregnant juvenile daughter, and goes on a four year political trip on the other side of America (the planet)?!?! huh? this is epic. and mccain KNEW about it???? really - there weren't ANY other women out there you could work with? It HAD to be the one under federal investigation, and PTA experience in a village somewhere in Alaska.... This registered Republican's in awe.
Posted by: anson | September 1, 2008 3:10 PM | Report abuse
Obama would probably fully support the move by Palin and her daughter--be proud of it. An unwed young woman pregnant and raise someone who will be great someday. Sound family Obama's mom. She would definitely support this because she did it herself.
Posted by: Sally | September 1, 2008 3:10 PM | Report abuse
She is PROUD of her daughters decision to have the baby and even PROUDER to become a Grandparent? This is too weird.
Posted by: Michael | September 1, 2008 3:10 PM | Report abuse
I smell sour grapes!
Doesn't matter, she's still going to be the Vice President.
Posted by: BooHoo | September 1, 2008 3:10 PM | Report abuse
Hmmm...McCain picks a Harriet Myers choice for Vice President...
Hey! McCain really *is* like George Bush!
Posted by: Marie Stewart | September 1, 2008 3:10 PM | Report abuse
My goodness you liberals are very scary people. I am praying very hard that America sees the light and elects a man and woman who respect not only this country but also human life. Certainly Mr. Barrack Hussain Obama, who is promising pay raises to every blue collar worker on the face earth, will only bring this country down. The Lord helps those who help themselves-not every lazy democrat alive!!!!!
Posted by: bets | September 1, 2008 3:10 PM | Report abuse
Does Palin need to tell the whole world about her daughter's pregnancy - she can't keep her family business for herself.
Posted by: Ginette | September 1, 2008 3:10 PM | Report abuse
All of you whining, hipocritical RepliCONS complaining at how "mean and ugly" people are can truly STUFF IT!!
IF THIS WERE OBAMA OR JOE'S DAUGHTER, YOU WOULD HAVE SICKED THE ROTTWIELERS ON HER AT FIRST MENTION, AND TORN HER TO SHREDS.
If you think the women of America are going to sit by while this religious zealot is going to LEGISLATE "ABSTINENCE" as the only choice to the DAUGHTERS OF AMERICA, and BAN CONTRACEPTION, then you truly have NO IDEA what we are made of.
And the sad fact is...poor Bristol never had a chance. If her own parents would throw her to the wolves like that that they would have her marry at 17, then you can BEST BELIEVE we will stand up for her and let her know that this is AMERICA, not a concentration camp, where she has no choice and no say!!
OUTRAGEOUS is right!
Posted by: misssymoto | September 1, 2008 3:10 PM | Report abuse
I got a kick out of the statement"proud of her willingness to come forward", if she had been willing it would have come out sooner not after being hounded by the press.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:10 PM | Report abuse
Alaskan population is up by one. How the hell anybody ended up living in Alaska??? Who wanna live there anyway.
Posted by: Bobster | September 1, 2008 3:09 PM | Report abuse
If he needed a woman, why on earth didn't John McCain choose Elizabeth Dole as a running mate? She earned a place on the presidential ticket a long time ago. I am a Republican and I have a 15 year-old daughter. If Bristol Palin can do it, why can't she? Her parents are so happy that she is pregnant. I don't like the way this is going. It makes Republicans look like hypocrites. I don't think Gov. Palin has earned a place on the ticket.
Posted by: Why not Dole | September 1, 2008 3:09 PM | Report abuse
I'm a liberal Democrat who worried that many Democrats were too easily assuming November would be an easy win.
But this pregnancy changes everything: McCain just lost. There's no rescuing him now.
Why? Because now the pregnancy and questions about what it means will be THE story. McCain loses the chance to frame his campaign as being about his taking a different, more competent approach to Gustav than Bush did to Katrina. And he loses the chance to use the Republican convention to frame what the campaign is about. Instead, now THE story is did he properly vet Palin? And also, should Palin resign from the ticket? Even if the ticket weathers those debates, those debates crowd out other story lines about the campaign that could help McCain. And at least for some voters, this reinforces a central worry about McCain that the Obama campaign exploits, that McCain makes rash judgments.
Palin won't lose Christian Right support; she and her family will be even more heroic. But to enough wavering voters (to hurt McCain), the pregnancy (along with Troopergate) will suggest that picking Palin was kind of a wacky decision, even if no smoking gun emerges in any of the stories surrounding Palin.
Posted by: gdelpa | September 1, 2008 3:09 PM | Report abuse
Holman, this has nothing to do with Palin's child. This is about Palin...and her hypocrisy.
Palin is an intolerant extreme "family values" Buchananite, yet she perpetrated a an elaborate (and quite foolish) hoax to hide the child's first pregnancy then kept the second pregnancy a secret, until now, to stay eligible as Mac's veep.
To make matters worse, she's forcing the child to marry the father to keep up the "family values" facade. I doubt Michelle Obama and her kids would have gotten any sympathy had they been in this situation. Hannity would probably have had a two-hour Faux News special of race-baiting and name-calling. Oy.
__________
Any attack on a non-combatant daughter (Chelsea) will irk the Evangelicals, women, monthers, and Limbaugh (ha!). Sarah will be martyred, if the Dems are stupid enough to touch it.
Posted by: Holman | September 1, 2008 2:47 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:09 PM | Report abuse
What a lamoid.... Palin is a disaster. McCain is an idiot for picking her. Ohama is hope, you racist, prick.
----------------------------------------------
Let's stay on message here:
Obama=Osama
McCain/Palin, 2008
Posted by: RealityChecker | September 1, 2008 3:02 PM
Posted by: whateva | September 1, 2008 3:09 PM | Report abuse
ahh Abstinence only education at it's best
Posted by: b | September 1, 2008 3:09 PM | Report abuse
I am definitely in the middle when it comes to my political views, which makes all of these extreme comments too amusing for me to stop reading.
I definitely get where the dems are coming from, if the shoe was on the other foot (a democratic foot), republicans would be screaming about why this country has a need for abstinence only teachings because clearly this girl was taught that sex was okay. However, since this girl was most likely taught the republican way - it makes it hard to buy what Palin is selling.
On the other hand, how can Palin be held responsible for everything her teen does? Almost all children do things (some on a regular or large scale basis) that their parents are not proud of, nor would approve of...and you're fooling yourself if you think you never were that child or have that child.
One last tidbit, for all the staunch republicans that leave their comments about how they just can not believe all the negative comments and mudslinging being done by the dems and then making sure to get your own pot-shot in (calling them morons, self-righteous, non-christian, etc) you aren't really proving your point - you are proving their's.
Posted by: Laughing from the middle | September 1, 2008 3:08 PM | Report abuse
"Not exactly the stay-at-home mom trumpeted by so-called conservatives."
I don't want her "staying at home" I want her being the Vice-President.
Let her husband take care of the kids.
The 21st century invites you to join it sexist "John"
Posted by: Trog | September 1, 2008 3:08 PM | Report abuse
I don't bash teenagers for getting pregnant. They lack the wisdom and experience to make long term decisions for themselves -- that's why they are SUPPOSED to be supervised by a parent or guardian.
I do bash holier-than-thou conservatives who make personal matters (like same-sex marriage and sex education) into political issues to get votes and then scream with outrage when the other side does the same thing to them.
Right-wing hypocrites like David Vitter, Larry Craig and now Sarah Palin deserve a nice big dose of their own medicine. I hope they choke on it. If Palin wants us to stay out of her personal life she can set a good example by keeping her mouth shut about the personal lives of others.
Posted by: simon | September 1, 2008 3:08 PM | Report abuse
I'm sure they'll be carting her out at the Republican Convention for the acceptance speech, won't they. I mean, shouldn't they, if they really believe in forgiveness?
Posted by: Dan Rains | September 1, 2008 3:08 PM | Report abuse
The complete failure of the Palins to parent their children is painfully obvious. They both need to step away from their political ambitions and focus on the needs of their ever expanding family. There is a 14 year old heading for the same problem if these two adults don't become alot less selfish in a hurry. The Palins profess to value family. Well, it's time to put their money where their mouths are. Go home, Sarah, go home.
Posted by: Gillian | September 1, 2008 3:08 PM | Report abuse
There seems to be a lot of passing judgement here. We don't know all of the details or intentions of the Palin family. It really isn't our business that their daughter is pregnant. I'm sure there is disappointment and concern for their daughter and her future. But I am sure she was taught correct principles and just made an inappropriate choice. Now she at least has the guts to face her consequences in a way she feels is most appropriate for the baby. Consider if you always listened to your parents at 17. The question we should be asking ourselves is can Palin be a good Vice President? She has a great approval rating on how she has governed Alaska; that should say something about her. She stands firm for what she believes and doesn't flip flop. Obama has never governed anything and flip flops on everything, even his friends. Maybe that is why his motto is "change". We as people are imperfect and sometimes we have consequences for making a bad choice, but our value system shouldn't change to make us look better. I'm not thrilled with either McCain or Obama. We need to do our homework and pick the one who will protect our country the best. All other issues are second to that. Let's look at our canidate's resumes to see who is best qualified for President and not treat this election like we are voting for class president in high school.
Posted by: Jenn | September 1, 2008 3:08 PM | Report abuse
what's her birthday? with her 5 months pregnant, she might got pregnant when she's 16
Posted by: sad | September 1, 2008 3:08 PM | Report abuse
The poor Palin family is way over their heads; this is looking quite like the Thomas Eagleton candidacy. Gov. Palin is an individual who, for all her good qualities and ambitions, doesn't appear to have put her family first in her decision. Her family needs to shelter their kids and give them the support they need right now which will not be found on the campaign trail. Sen. McCain appears to not have been thinking at all of their situation at all when he picked her.
Posted by: Eugene | September 1, 2008 3:07 PM | Report abuse
It's not the pregnancy, it's the hypocrisy, stupid! Religious right nuts say 'no' to choice in pregnancy matters, say 'no' to sex education, say 'no' to social programs, yet want us to buy into their family values tripe...priceless!
You can't buy this sort of entertainment. Palin is politically unqualified for VP, hope you Americans at least get that part of it. The rest of the drama is just icing on the cake of a liberal laugh-riot, and the conservatives are the punchline.
Posted by: Canadian liberal | September 1, 2008 3:07 PM | Report abuse
The real issue here is, can you imagine Palin facing off against Putin, with nuks pointing at each other? The soccer mom against one of the most devious and cutthroat former KGB agents. In the experience department, Obama isn't too far behind Palin. As others have pointed out, it is an example of McCain's poor decision making ability. At 72, his brain may not be firing on all cylinders.
Posted by: godhelpus | September 1, 2008 3:07 PM | Report abuse
This is so very Right-wing Republican. Palin makes this announcement--as if Britol's current pregnancy disproves that the baby boy is Bristol's as well. But, having babies back to back is not that unusual for many very troubled teens. Many are pregnant again within six weeks of giving birth!!
Posted by: young47 | September 1, 2008 3:07 PM | Report abuse
I am excited to hear what kind of stupid name shes got lined-up for this kid.
Posted by: JoeMama | September 1, 2008 3:07 PM | Report abuse
You know, it's kind of funny how the liberals are attacking Governor Palin. First, let's assume that Barack Obama was in the same position: had five chidren, one with down syndrome, and a 17 year-old daughter pregnant. You wouldn't hear about it because he is a man. But, because Governor Palin has made politics her career, her husband isn't good enough to raise their family. I believe it was Barack Obama who said if his daughter ended up a pregnant teenager, it wouldn't matter. So, keep your hypocritical views to yourself, because it's only going to be the downfall of your party.
Second, I love how they say Governor Palin has no experience to be Commander-in-Chief, should that situation arise. Let me tell you, as an active duty member, I am disgusted at the way liberals slap a yellow ribbon on their, but constantly bash the success we're making in Iraq, constantly spit on via the use of protests and hateful words, and approve of Obama's cutting $10 billion from the military's budget, all but ceasing military research and promising the military "we may see a pay raise by the end of his first term." Tell a young E1-E5 they make enough money you hypocrits. You tell that Solider, Sailor, Marine or Airmen that has deployed to Iraq in a VOLUNTEER force that he or she only is a baby killer and Nazi. That's exactly was Michael Moore, Dick Durbin, Keith Olbermann, Rosie O'Donnel, Whoopi Goldberg, Bill Maher, and the rest of the left wing sickos in this country liken our troops too: nazis and baby killers. It's kind of funny that like John Kerry, Joe Biden was for the war before he was against it. So, continue to sit on your couch and make love to your TV screen with Olbermann begins to blow rhetorical smoke from every orifice in his body. It's also kind of funny that the ten poorest cities in this country are ran by digusting, filthy, corrupt Democrats who continue to be elected into office by keeping the dumb, dumb and the poor, poor. Before the rest of your liberals decide to spout off more garbage, do the homework on your own candidate first. John McCain has taken responsibility for his actions, but what about your beloved Obama. He hasn't taken any responsibility for any of the following: Tony Rezko, Jeremiah Right, Rev. Phelger, Frank Marshall Davis, Dick Durbin, voting "present" over 100 times, hate-filled Michelle Obama, not challenging the status quo as he so promised the fickle liberals by choosing 36 year Senate veteran Biden.
I can honestly say, as an active duty member, I find it truly disgusting that America would even entertain the thought of Obama becoming our Commander-in-Chief. When has Obama showed any type of leadership to actually lead troops into battle? Yes, and you liberals say McCain's 20 years as a Naval Officer is no prerequisite, right. Most of that rhetoric is coming from those of you who would rather spit on my brave brothers and sisters who actually love this country.
Before you attack McCain/Palin, do you homework on your own candidate first. Democrats are nothing by God's form of idiocy on planet earth.
Posted by: Liberals hate American and Troops | September 1, 2008 3:07 PM | Report abuse
"You literally could not make this up. The religious abstinance nuts are going to be exposed as utter hypocrites. Wait until the Animal Rights activists find out the "Governor" considers slaughtering wolves from planes a sport..."
It isn't that they don't make mistakes,it's what they do to make it right.Barracks answer is killing the punisher.Her answer is loving her child and being responable for her actions.
I do agree it is much easier to kill unborn children,sick but the easy unethical choice.Most unethical choices are easy but they do have consequeces.
Womens right to choose....to kill your unborn living child.
Doesn't sound as smart if you finishe the sentence.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:07 PM | Report abuse
OBAMA: BACK OFF!!
Politico's Carrie Budoff Brown reports: At a press avail in Monroe, Mich., Barack Obama on Palin: "Back off these kinds of stories."
"I have said before and I will repeat again: People's families are off limits," Obama said. "And people's children are especially off-limits. This shouldn't be part of politics. It has no relevance to Gov. Palin's performance as a governor and/or her potential performance as a vice president. So I would strongly urge people to back off these kinds of stories. You know my mother had me when she was 18 and how a family deals with issues and teenage children, that shouldn’t be a topic of our politics."
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:07 PM | Report abuse
Never underestimate the right-wing's willingness to overlook actions by their own that they would be screeching for impeachment if it was a Democrat doing it. Sexual harassment suit and obscene phone calls by Bill O'Reilly? No biggie. Drug addiction and multiple marriages for Limbaugh. So what? Cheating on your cancer-ridden wife and dumping her for a younger model by Newt? Hey, he's only human. Dumping your first wife who stuck by you while you were in the military after she got in a disfiguring car accident for a younger richer model by Johnny Mac. Just a normal all-American guy thing. And, hey, did we mention he spent 5 years as a POW.
Posted by: J | September 1, 2008 3:07 PM | Report abuse
I'm still curious why people think the woman should stay home with the kids, but do not question Biden's decision to join the Senate when his wife died...he could have gotten a job near home as a lawyer..never enough of those.
Posted by: Curiouser | September 1, 2008 3:07 PM | Report abuse
######Scelleton Counter######
1 out 2 to go and we are done with John McCain.
Posted by: BOBSTER | September 1, 2008 3:07 PM | Report abuse
Typical Liberal hypocrisy at work here - don't judge people over their personal decisions, don't force your values upon other people...unless those people are Republicans. They consider it okay to attack Republicans over things they wouldn't find the least bit troubling if a Democrat did it. Take away all the votes of people who have an out-of-wedlock child somewhere in the family and I guarantee you'd lose a lot more Democratic votes than Republican ones. Yet these people are sitting here telling us that Sarah Palan is fair game to be attacked over the fact that her daughter got pregnant. Maybe what they don't like is the fact that she's keeping the baby? They would rather that she kill it, that would be their idea of family values.
And it's real funny to see that some of these total nutjobs are STILL persisting in the rumor that Sarah Palin's son with Down's syndrome is actually her daughter's child. Good job, geniuses: The baby, Trig, is four months old, and the daughter, Bristol, is five months pregnant. No wonder so many Democrats are struggling to make ends meet and are bitterly jealous of Republicans with money: They can't get jobs in good-paying professional fields because they can't do the most basic math.
Posted by: The Left is a Lie | September 1, 2008 3:07 PM | Report abuse
McCain - Palin has been a fiasco from the first moment and it just gets crazier. You could not make this stuff up. McCain's bizarre sense of judgment makes him unfit for the presidency. The Palins deserve our sympathy for all they'll go through thanks to McCain dragging them into the spotlight when they should be focusing on the health of their family. McCain has moved from "maverick" to "weird" and his erratic thinking belongs nowhere near the Oval Office.
Posted by: middleamerica | September 1, 2008 3:06 PM | Report abuse
As much as there is some satisfaction in such a story showing up about an arch social-conservative, this is the business of the family. What should be of concern though is whether McCain knew about it and when, etc. In other words, this is about McCain's judgement and basics like vetting someone as important as VP of the U.S.
Posted by: Not about Palin | September 1, 2008 3:06 PM | Report abuse
The girl in the picture is Willow, not Bristol.
Posted by: Juneau | September 1, 2008 3:06 PM | Report abuse
Poor girl, probably being forced by parents to marry a person with whom she had a one night fling. Just to make her mother look better.
Posted by: Sara | September 1, 2008 3:06 PM | Report abuse
"so much for the "liberal left"... you would think the far right would be upset.
Didn't Obama's mother have him when she was 17??? hypocritical
from an independent that has voted democratic in each election ...except this one..."
ONE MORE TIME: OBAMA'S MOTHER ISN'T RUNNING FOR ANYTHING - she died years ago. This isn't about Bristol - this is about Sarah Palin's judgment.
Posted by: kreuz_missile | September 1, 2008 3:06 PM | Report abuse
Everyone can throw around all this crazy talk,(some quite hilarious) but in the end it all comes down to judgement, John McCain's lack thereof.
Posted by: smokey | September 1, 2008 3:06 PM | Report abuse
"Eyes2disinfo"
Marriage date set and keeping child equals family values to me!!!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:05 PM | Report abuse
She's a hypocrite on two fronts: The unwed pregnancy of her daughter (announced at the height of Gustav overkill coverage) and her own decision to become VP and move to Washington when she obviously is needed by her four kids under 18 years old back at home. Not exactly the stay-at-home mom trumpeted by so-called conservatives. I wonder if they taught Bristol abstinence only?
Posted by: John | September 1, 2008 3:05 PM | Report abuse
Sarah Palin is the Martha Stewert of Alaska. And we all know how Martha ended up. She makes all of us "normal" women look bad, or at least she is supposed to. I am a registered Libertarian, and at least I have the common sense to know that I can not raise a special needs baby AND be Vice President of the US equally well. One would have to take a back seat to the other. It appears Sarah Palin's family has already taken a back seat to her political ambitions in that her teenage daughter is pregnant. So much for the philosophy that women should do EVERYTHING and do it all equally well for less pay than a man. No thanks! I think Palin needs to get her own house in order before she comes waving her bible in my face telling me how to take care of my family. I have done a better job raising my family than she has- and I could pass rigorous vetting! elect me VP, I am just as unqualified as her LOL!
Posted by: Karin | September 1, 2008 3:05 PM | Report abuse
What about Biden's son who was reported to have "disappeared" from the public eye? Since we seem to know everything about Palin's daughter, does anyone know any details about him?
Posted by: janice | September 1, 2008 3:05 PM | Report abuse
Soon mother and daughter will be breast feeding together, and then next they will plan babies together and then soon become grandmas together and then -- - LOL
The Alaskan circus has come to town
Posted by: Raja | September 1, 2008 3:05 PM | Report abuse
I am sickened by the amount of people who critisize and blame, as if they have never made mistakes in their life. How many of "YOU" could pass the scrutiny of the media and judgemental people. I think that Palin will weather this storm just fine. As for the rest of you living in your glass houses, stop and think before throwing that stone.
Posted by: Steve | September 1, 2008 3:05 PM | Report abuse
Stick a fork in her, she's done.
Posted by: Done | September 1, 2008 3:05 PM | Report abuse
James from Maine: "The Dem's solution to everything is to spend our way out of trouble."
Yeah, yeah, and Clinton left this country with a $127 billion budget surplus, while Shrub is leaving a $400 billion-plus deficit to his successor, who'll have to try to clean up the mess. So much for fiscal responsibility. I guess Dubbya's solution is to spend our way INTO trouble.
Posted by: mishi | September 1, 2008 3:05 PM | Report abuse
PALIN will ask to be taken OFF the ticket so she can spend time
with her family during this difficult time as more questions about
her fake pregnancy mount. And as more serious charges emerge in
her own troopergate scandal.
NEW AUDIO tape of her chief of state pressuring the Public Safety Director to FIRE Palin's ex-brother-in-law, because the trooper left her sister, after disovering sister was having an affair.
Posted by: Bob | September 1, 2008 3:05 PM | Report abuse
"Lack of international experience? She lives 70 miles from Russia!"
First of all, she doesn't live 70 miles from Russia. She loves very far from Russia because Alaska is so big. Secondly, Alaska is near the least inhabited part of Russia, not Moscow and St. Petersburg. Even so, just because I live in Houston, for example, I'm not an expert on the intricacies of Mexican politics, and I am certainly not up to speed on the IMF, World Bank, NATO expansion, EU constitutional crises, etc. But the VP of the United States had better be. And I strongly suspect that Palin doesn't even know the difference between the EU's area of authority and the ECB's area of authority.
Posted by: Mike | September 1, 2008 3:05 PM | Report abuse
so who's the daddy her father or her brother?! Someone needs to rent a copy of "Juno", I mean "Juneau"....
Posted by: ucan'thandlethetruth | September 1, 2008 3:04 PM | Report abuse
Sarah Palin is to McCain what Harriet Miers was to George W. Both are woefully under-qualified candidates who shed harsh light on poor judgement of their prospective bosses.
Posted by: nudels | September 1, 2008 3:04 PM | Report abuse
Ha’aretz reports that Joe Biden told Israeli leaders that they would have to accept a nuclear Iran if Barack Obama wins the Presidency. Israelis expressed “amazement” at Biden’s attitude:
Democratic vice-presidential candidate Joe Biden was quoted Monday as telling senior Israeli officials behind closed doors that the Jewish state will have to reconcile itself to a nuclear Iran.
In the unsourced report, Army Radio also quoted Biden as saying that he opposed “opening a additional military and diplomatic front.”
Biden, chairman of the powerful Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has long been considered strongly pro-Israel. His nomination as Barack Obama’s running mate had been expected to shore up the Democrats’ strength with U.S. Jewish voters.
For those unfamiliar with Ha’aretz, it doesn’t exactly have a knee-jerk conservative spin. In fact, it’s at best a center-left editorial board. They’re not terribly sympathetic to the Bush administration or most of its policies. They wouldn’t have much reason to simply make this up.
If anyone doubted that an Obama presidency would surrender to radicalism and hostile forces abroad, this should clinch it. Biden has pretty much told the Israelis that they’re on their own, and America won’t bother to support them against the nutcases in the region. If Obama and Biden don’t have the courage to face Iran’s nuclear ambitions, then exactly when will they defend American interests?
And what of our Western allies? Europe wants Iranian nukes stopped just as much as we do, especially since they’re more directly threatened by them. Obama and Biden talk about bolstering our alliances, but it looks like they’re more interested in leaving them holding the bag.
Hugh Hewitt sees this as further evidence that Obama is nothing more than the second coming of Jimmy Carter:
American supporters of Israel have to understand that Obama-Biden is a disaster for Israel’s security. It would be Carter II, but without the keen insight that Carter brought to Iran policy.
It’s worse than that. Carter at least had a deranged notion of justice as a foundation; this just looks like cowardice.
Update: The Jerusalem Post says this conversation took place three years ago:
Army Radio reported that the Delaware senator was heard saying in closed conversations with Jerusalem officials three years ago that he was firmly opposed to an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities.
Biden, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, reportedly claimed that Israel would likely have to come to terms with a nuclear Iran. He reportedly expressed doubt over the effectiveness of economic sanctions imposed on the Islamic Republic and said he was against the opening of an additional military and diplomatic front, saying that the US had more pressing problems, such as North Korea and Iraq.
The Ha’aretz report didn’t mention a time frame. Still, either way, the message is the same: Biden won’t stand up to Iran, and since Barack Obama chose him for his foreign-policy chops, one has to figure that Obama agrees. After all, Biden is the man who once proposed sending $200 million to Tehran to pacify the mullahs.
Posted by: Mark Garnett | September 1, 2008 3:04 PM | Report abuse
Sarah increasingly becomes 'everywoman' as each personal story is revealed..
..Styx
Posted by: StyxandStones | September 1, 2008 3:04 PM | Report abuse
How's that abstinence education working for you, Palin family?
Posted by: Richard, Los Angeles | September 1, 2008 3:04 PM | Report abuse
Alan in Misoula, I gave you the wrong email address - it is
Mark_in_Austin@operamail.com.
Posted by: MarkInAustin | September 1, 2008 3:04 PM | Report abuse
Willow, bristol, trigger? Where are Ahmet, Moon Unit and Dweezil?
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 3:04 PM | Report abuse
Request to all Pastors and Ministers in America:
Please help the Palin and McCain families in these hard times with all your expertise.
Vote your conscience, with civic duty for the most qualified candidates. Your head and the heart will tell you to vote for Obama-Biden. We all have one and the same God, so there is no trick in this situation. Be brave and serve your country well.
Posted by: O. P. Neon | September 1, 2008 3:04 PM | Report abuse
you know, I've always felt proud calling nyself a democrat....no longer...
Obama as president will bring change--> he's seemed to changed democrats all right--->into hateful, distgusting people who are no better than the the people they trash.
Posted by: anthony | September 1, 2008 3:04 PM | Report abuse
A minefield.
For the Democrats.
Expect lots of ugly nonsense from bloggers and Obama fans (just as we would get from the other side, if the roles were reversed), but nothing from Obama nor from anyone who can be linked to his campaign. Not if they have any sense.
Posted by: WylieD | September 1, 2008 3:04 PM | Report abuse
Just makes her family seem more human to me...
Posted by: 6799 | September 1, 2008 3:03 PM | Report abuse
This is in sharp contrast to Obama, who wouldn't want his daughter "punished" with a child if she makes a mistake. I admire the Palins and what they stand for. LIfe is sacred.
Posted by: Joyce | September 1, 2008 3:03 PM | Report abuse
To "Nick" at 2:55 p.m.:
It is not a "private matter" when the mother touts "family values" and abstinence and opposes family planning and abortion rights and is selected to run for the nation's second highest executive office.
But you're right: Obama's people should say nothing. And why would they do anything but? The cardinal rule of politics is to stand aside when your opponent is committing political suicide.
Posted by: Eyes2disinfo | September 1, 2008 3:03 PM | Report abuse
Easy question: how can we expect her to oversee a nation if she can't even monitor her own family?
Posted by: ronert | September 1, 2008 3:03 PM | Report abuse
Palin's daughter isn't running for VP.
Posted by: Hello! | September 1, 2008 3:03 PM | Report abuse
When I heard this news I was appalled. 30 years ago my girlfriend and I were in Britney and her boyfriend's position (BC is not 100% effective regardless of the form). It would have been difficult enough to have a parent in a high profile position like Governor and face the decisions that we had to face. (It was a boy). But to have that parent decide to up the ante by accepting an offer to run for the Vice-Presidency! That's unbelievably selfish.
The whole world will be watching their every move. Could they really decide to put the child up for adoption is this circus-like atmosphere? Would that baby and the adoptive parents be allowed to live their lives undisturbed? These are a few of the questions that Sarah Palin should have asked herself before accepting McCain's offer. I believe that she came up with the WRONG answers.
Posted by: Paul Criger | September 1, 2008 3:03 PM | Report abuse
Why oh why must Sarah Palin allow her daughter to be punished with a baby? :-P
Posted by: TruckerRedbeard | September 1, 2008 3:02 PM | Report abuse
So I guess that this announcement by the governor herself aobut her daughter's pregnancy is supposed to squelch the rumors. But suppose she did originally did cover for her daughter... what is one more lie, and what if -- wonders never cease in this case -- it turns out that they later allege that this newly reported pregancy ends up in an alleged miscarriage? If that raises any eyebrows it will be after the election in November anyway, right? For me, if the original rumors are credible, this well-timed "announcement" is not evidence either way. In the original rumor, people at the local health center would have had to have been in cahoots with the Governor -- and that could still be the case. I'm not saying the rumors are true, only that this announcement has no bearing whatsoever on their plausibility -- unless of course you for some reason believe this new "fact" -- but then why would you have believed the initial rumor? On the other hand, if they lied then, they are lying now -- and the "beauty" of it (for them) is that the truth of this new revelation is unverifiable, unless Bristol, unlike her mother, is actually showing signs of being pregnant.
Posted by: frank burns | September 1, 2008 3:02 PM | Report abuse
If you were born 1969 or earlier, your parents were 17 or 18 too - guaranteed.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:02 PM | Report abuse
"This savaging of Palin and her daughter means I will never vote democratic again.
Goodbye and good riddance."
Yet you sign the post "Hillary 2012"
BRILLIANT!!!!!
Posted by: kreuz_missile | September 1, 2008 3:02 PM | Report abuse
Let's stay on message here:
Obama=Osama
McCain/Palin, 2008
Posted by: RealityChecker | September 1, 2008 3:02 PM | Report abuse
h y p o c r i t e s!
You can teach CREATIONISM IN SCHOOL, but NO SEX EDUCATION!
Who's the mommies baby of Trig anyway? America wants to know. Bristol could have gotten pregnant right after Trig was born. Abstinence does not work! They don't believe in birth control, so there you have it!
WONDER WHO THE OLD FART WILL PICK FOR HIS RUNNING MATE NOW. WAIT UNTIL TROOPERGATE COMES OUT. NOW SHE RAN TED STEVENS (indicted) 527 FOR THE BRIDGE TO NOWHERE, THAT SHE SUPPORTED WHOLE HEARTEDLY!
Like I said, wow, this lady is a hypocrite, who has no idea what goes on in the lower 48!
Posted by: Andrea D | September 1, 2008 3:02 PM | Report abuse
First, Cheney's lesbian daughter and now Palin's unmarried pregnant teen? Not that these things bother me. Individuals have preference. Mistakes and accidents happen.
What is annoying is that these people preach such things are by choice and by lack of morals.
Posted by: ironic republican vp's | September 1, 2008 3:02 PM | Report abuse
Gee, all this nasty gossip is actually kinda fun after all. Maybe I'm missing a bet by never watching Dr. Phil, Jerry Springer, Oprah, etc.
Posted by: radlib | September 1, 2008 3:02 PM | Report abuse
I heard the Todd Palin was responsible for the pregnancy. He's fathered many children throughout Alaska. Way to go Todd. ;)
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 3:02 PM | Report abuse
What Joe Scarborough really thinks about Palin Nomination!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTbsbeY5k5k
Let's see how they spin it this week.
Posted by: Angellight | September 1, 2008 3:02 PM | Report abuse
oh, and i love the right-wingers who keep telling liberals to be careful- that this could backfire. that's usually a good indication that you're on the something.
Posted by: ferplexion | September 1, 2008 3:02 PM | Report abuse
"Maybe John McCain will let the newlyweds live in one of his houses."
Priceless.
Posted by: Marie Stewart | September 1, 2008 3:01 PM | Report abuse
If Sarah Palin had any intelligence, she would have declined McCain's offer to be VP. Now she will be an international laughing stock and ruin all of her future political ambitions. The MCCain campaign is runnign amok.
Posted by: Wrangler - Kansas | September 1, 2008 3:01 PM | Report abuse
"To add proof of Palin's selfishness and her "me first" attitude is the fact that she chose to board a plane for an 8 hour flight, with prematurely ruptured membranes in her fifth pregnancy."
It takes a breathtaking degree of arrogance to second guess the way another woman conducts her pregnancy.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:01 PM | Report abuse
Face it, you can preach abstinence or birth control...but teenagers act impulsively and do not always practice what they preach.
I don't care that her daughter is pg. I like that she is keeping the baby.
I don't like the way they hid this beneath the hurricane. What else are they hiding?
As for Dems. being mean... all public figures are subject to scrutiny. I have heard Conservatives complain that Obama vacationed on a "private" beach. Give me a break.
If SP is as dynamic as she seems to be, it's a shame she didn't say "no". Stay home take care of her children for another four years. Gain more experience. Give the kids privacy. And, run for President in 4 or 8 years. It wouldn't be too late.
Childhood- and teen years are fleeting. The job of VP can wait.
Is it fair that a woman should wait while a man could go ahead and run without comment? No.
Would a man with this little exp. and no acting career even be considered? Not likely.
Posted by: Jenn | September 1, 2008 3:01 PM | Report abuse
This has Rove all over it. If Rove had enough influence to get McCain to eliminate Liberman as a VP choice then he must have had a big say in McCain's choice of Palin. It's pure turd blossum at its best; do anything, sacrifice anyone in order to get into the White House. Times are desperate so let's try the symapthy card.
Posted by: genelabean | September 1, 2008 3:01 PM | Report abuse
What does this say about her ability to lead her family as a Christian?
Posted by: Family | September 1, 2008 3:01 PM | Report abuse
"Look, I got two daughters — 9 years old and 6 years old," he said. "I am going to teach them first about values and morals, but if they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby.......
Barrack Obama
Love the slander answers.
I always find it funny that the ones who champion antibigotry,tolerance,and fairness
Are the biggest intolerant bigots.
I am sure i will get plenty of F**k you you evil B*st**d.etc,etc replies from the enlightened ones.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:01 PM | Report abuse
You people are delusional.. Believe me Obama will never win in the south or the Mountain West. Simply put southernerns and people from the mountain states will never vote for a black man...period. If it weren't for you flakes in California and New York, Demoncats would NEVER win a presidential election! If your man took a drug test he'd fail. Guarantee you he's still hitting the bong and snorting up the nose candy!
Posted by: Tulsa_town | September 1, 2008 3:01 PM | Report abuse
Loving parents should encourage their children to marry for love. The McCain-Palin ticket will stand stronger if they have the courage to allow Bristol to marry the person she chooses at a time when she feels ready.
Posted by: CShih | September 1, 2008 3:00 PM | Report abuse
Children shouldn't have children. Period. At the same time, it's not the girl's fault. Her parents are the one's who failed her.
Posted by: Erik | September 1, 2008 3:00 PM | Report abuse
wow, Sarah is a gift from McCain. First the Trooper scandal, now her daugher is pregnant. Then the rumors that she is pregnant again. Actually that wont affect my vote even is she was though. http://www.veeppeek.com But at the same time, Its keeping McCain and Palin in the News., havnt heard much about Obama lately?
Complete reversal. It was Obama Obama Obama? Now its Palin Palin Palin. I think I would rather Palin then McCain.
Posted by: JOHN | September 1, 2008 3:00 PM | Report abuse
she can't even run her own family, how could she possibly run the country?
Posted by: ferplexion | September 1, 2008 3:00 PM | Report abuse
At least her daughter lived in a nation with the freedom to make her own choice. The American Taliban would have it the other way. I'm pro life AND pro choice. I'm pro abstinence AND pro birth control.
It's called Freedom, and it ain't no ones business but the mother and the father.
Posted by: Post American | September 1, 2008 3:00 PM | Report abuse
Yeah, what about this girl's rights? Has anyone asked her if she really loves this father? Who exactly is the father? This girl should have a sit-down with Hillary Clinton. What kind of message does "marry the father at 17" send to this girl? See, this is the whole problem with conservatives. They know what they teach their children doesn't work, but they pass laws anyway that punish people for their mistakes. Do you know what would happen to this girl if she lived in Iran?! If you ask me, this is even more of a reason to vote Democratic. At least they have an understanding of human fallibility and the need to have social nets for those who are unfortunate enough to get into situations like this but do not have wealthy parents to support them, like what happens in the inner cities every day.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 3:00 PM | Report abuse
Jorsen - just for the record, blacks did not support Alan Keyes, and I doubt they would whole-heartedly support Condolezza Rice or even Colin Powel. I'm so tired of people saying blacks support Obama because he is black; there are many more reasons before race is ever considered.
Posted by: seni2738 | September 1, 2008 3:00 PM | Report abuse
Mrs. Palin: I don't know if you know that babies need bonding time with their mother to develop into healthy secure adults. Special needs babies/children needs additional bonding time with the main caretaker to feel secure,love and to develop. How can you be so happy on the go for days and weeks and leaving behind your beautiful child. Are you nuts?????????? I don't thing that that is what Jesus/God wants you to be doing.
Posted by: Amarillys | September 1, 2008 3:00 PM | Report abuse
-----------PALIN FOR VP?!!------------
--------OVER OUR COLD, DEAD BODIES!!!-----
XOXOX,
Women of America
Posted by: misssymoto | September 1, 2008 3:00 PM | Report abuse
Chris, thanks for defending the Obama/Biden ticket against the ridiculous charge that Dems would exploit, much less invent a complex family drama that is BIG in ALL the Alaskan newspapers. No, not this mundane twist, the bizarro behavior of Sarah on the days before Trig was born.
Posted by: jhbyer | September 1, 2008 3:00 PM | Report abuse
This is so totally amazing. What kind of person is McCain, to put this woman (Governor Palin) and her family through this. How can these people ever enjoy a normal life after being thrust into the spotlight like this? I am not a fan of Governor Palin's but I am suddenly finding myself feeling very sorry for her and her family. I can only imagine the heartlessness that McCain's operatives must possess to do this. They knew about the pregnancy before they trotted her out and yet they didn't blink an eye. McCain pointed out that it "was a private family matter." Well it's not private any longer and I do not think the Palins have any idea what their lives are about to become.
Posted by: Scott | September 1, 2008 3:00 PM | Report abuse
This wouldn't be a news if it wasn't for the fact that Sarah Palin's supposed strength lies in her conservative Evangelical credentials. According to her own judgmental world view, Sarah Palin has failed as a mother. She should quit her VP run now, and go write a book on parenting with Britney Spear's mom.
Posted by: nudels | September 1, 2008 3:00 PM | Report abuse
before returning to Labor Day to 'missymoto': classy, very nice sentiments - no hate or anger there. Please help bring us together on mutually agreed upon principles & policies and lead us forward for collective benefit ... is that not the theme of Sen Obama's campaign: 'change we can believe in'? Or is it really the charade I think it is, of shut up, sit down, go away and do as your told - I know better what to do as government, which always has the answers when I am running it than voters as individuals leading their own lives. Isn't it it time for you to return to your monthly Weatherman meeting with Bill Ayers tonight.
Posted by: Reaction to Closed Minds | September 1, 2008 2:59 PM | Report abuse
You literally could not make this up. The religious abstinance nuts are going to be exposed as utter hypocrites. Wait until the Animal Rights activists find out the "Governor" considers slaughtering wolves from planes a sport...
Posted by: Robert Luciano | September 1, 2008 2:59 PM | Report abuse
Publius,
Don't you know that this theory is already being spread around the net? Totally Jerry Springer style. I've read several reliable websites where reports are stating that Bristol is Trigs mom. How else could Palin get back to work the very next day? Very shady... very, very shady...
__________________________________________
Trig Palin was born on 4/18/08. That gives Bristol just enough time to be in her fifth month of a new pregnancy. Just because Bristol is pregnant now, doesn't mean she wasn't pregnant before.
Posted by: Publius | September 1, 2008 2:52 PM
Posted by: The Truth | September 1, 2008 2:59 PM | Report abuse
One thing is right when McCain claimed Obama is less qualified than Gov. Palin.
Barack does not have a 17 year old daughter. Perhaps, he does notfeel left out or bad about it.
Barack Obama is an underdog in the race so far.
Posted by: O.P. Neon | September 1, 2008 2:59 PM | Report abuse
www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKkydrUnBZE
Posted by: bill | September 1, 2008 2:59 PM | Report abuse
Let's stay on message: McCain = Bush
Obama/Biden 2008
Posted by: Common Man | September 1, 2008 2:59 PM | Report abuse
He---regardless of the name of the Book you read or what you call Him--has urged all of us to care for one another and not to judge.
Sounds good in theory. I'm an atheist who follows the 10 Commandments. Because its the right thing for me to do. But I hate fundamentalists Christians. They are the most hateful, selfish, judgemental group of people I have ever met.
Okay, I don't really hate them. I just have total contempt for their hypocrtical lifestyle. They are the worst!!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:59 PM | Report abuse
The Democrats do not need to do anything negative towards Gov. palin. She will do that to herself and the only strategy is to let her.
Posted by: mitch kaplan | September 1, 2008 2:58 PM | Report abuse
It's rather amazing to me that this somehow becomes an issue of "Dems need to be careful". Aparently now if you're a Democrat & you ask a question somehow you're evil. BS!!! In this Country I have a right to question potential leaders about ANYTHING I damn well choose without you or anyone else telling me my questions are out of line. We've questioned EVERYTHING with Obama (as we should) & now we have a right to question EVERYTHING about sweet innocent Sara Palin. Welcome to bigtime politics Sarah...
Posted by: Chapman | September 1, 2008 2:58 PM | Report abuse
The ignorance here just blows my mind and scares me if it is typical of the rest of the country. First there's the whole Trig is probably Bristols baby thing. HMMM I am pretty sure a woman can't nurse a baby if she wasn't pregnant and how would we explain Bristol's growing tummy. This is all just so stupid I can't even let myself believe that other people buy this. Next statutory rape in Alaska and my state probably others is UNDER 16. Third as for Palin's brother in law. He was not fit to be a state troper. He threatened to shoot her sister and some others and abused his 11 year old son. I would want him fired too!! I could go down this list all day but it is scary to think some people who post here actually get to vote. YIKES! Do your homework!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:58 PM | Report abuse
Maybe John McCain will let the newlyweds live in one of his houses.
Posted by: Buck in NC | September 1, 2008 2:58 PM | Report abuse
2 questions:
What guy in his right mind has sex with a girl with mono?
Is it worse for McCain if she stays on the ticket or recuses herself to spend more time with her family?
I smell a McCain Jindel '08 sign on the way.
Posted by: Patrick | September 1, 2008 2:58 PM | Report abuse
While I plan to vote for Obama, I'd like to remind posters that this is no time for cheap shots. Most teen pregnancies have tragic dimensions to them and I'm sure this is no different--hardly a cause for glee. That's tacky.
That said, what the heck does this say about McCain and his vetting process? I just have a hard time believing that they would take this kind of a chance. I predict heads will be rolling in the McCain campaign. Perhaps even a do over.
Posted by: Michael | September 1, 2008 2:58 PM | Report abuse
Hold on, just hold it a second... What real evidence has there really been that Bristol is Trig's mother other than impossible to prove rumors?
A: there are known photos of Sarah Palin at public engagements in Alaska earlier this year, appearing pregnant, precisely when she should have been.
B: at that point, there was no motive to put up some elaborate "cover story" to protect Bristol, or a national audience to deceive.
C: a photo posted earlier of Sarah, baby Trig, and Bristol, was said to be proof of Bristol's "post-birth fat".
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=117egpk&s=4
Did no one notice the McCain's over to the left? This was taken backstage in Dayton on Friday at the VP announcement. In which case, Bristol's fat is not "post-birth" weight, but pregnancy weight, because she IS pregnant, as we've just found out.
I am not defending anyone at all, and I'm not even a registered Republican. But I am a stickler for details, and it pisses me off when true dates & locations of photos are conveniently overlooked just to help spread rumors. And just for the record, I think the same thing about the absurd "Obama- Muslim" photos that have been tossed around, taken out of context. Its wrong no matter what party is involved.
Posted by: chirlee | September 1, 2008 2:58 PM | Report abuse
Tolerance is a word that is thrown around a lot but seems to be little practiced.
We all want good things for the next generation. We just differ on how to get there.
People on the right attacking people on the left and vice versa. It's a shame, people. We can agree to disagree but these character assassinations are disgusting. The venom with which people speak says more about themselves than the people they attack. It doesn't matter if they are on the left or right.
Just my two cents. Now attack me.
Posted by: Old School | September 1, 2008 2:58 PM | Report abuse
'"Knowing that her daughter was pregnant, Sarah Palin should never have accepted the VP selection."
You seem to be saying that the Palins should be hiding and hanging their heads in shame.'
Um, no. What that first is saying is that the Palin's should be at home taking care of each other instead of dragging out the family's problems on primetime TV.
I feel really bad for Sarah's daughter. Not for the fact that she got knocked up (that's her fault) but the fact that her mother is dragging it out on TV...
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:58 PM | Report abuse
It is a non factor that a 17yr old daughter of Republican Sarah Palin's is now pregnant or that she is having premarital sex. However these very same conservatives preach about social values and lecture the democrats about social issues but when it comes to one of their own it is perfectly ok. If this was the other way around with Biden it would be all over conservative blogs and radio talk shows. So, let's be fair and say Sarah Palin did not raise her own kids on social values but goes around lecturing conservative values to rest of America. She fails to lead by example and that is not what we want in a VP.
Posted by: aphouston | September 1, 2008 2:58 PM | Report abuse
Yes she's a preggy but we love her dearly, and she's going to get married! Yup, yup!
Posted by: Worst than Mondale/Ferraro | September 1, 2008 2:57 PM | Report abuse
Good lord, the republicans hipocrisy know no bounds!! They are the most self righteous ultra conservative religion nut group in the country, and yet when one of their own does something stupid that proves abstinence only education is a joke, and that she's a sinner who has premarital sex....they act like its no big deal.
Posted by: Paul | September 1, 2008 2:57 PM | Report abuse
There's no way the Republicans are going to turn this into an us vs. them issue. Sen. Obama doesn't want his opponent's children attacked any more than he would invite such attacks upon his own children. We can wish all the best to Gov. Palin and her family and still believe she was a very foolish choice for the job.
Posted by: Sarah (not that one) | September 1, 2008 2:57 PM | Report abuse
Why is it that those who extol abstinence-only sex education often seem to end up in these teenage-pregnancy situations? And, pray tell, why is it that those who are most adamant about telling me how to live my life seem to have so little control over their own?
Just asking.
Posted by: byrdland49 | September 1, 2008 2:57 PM | Report abuse
Why should Palin have stayed home with her kids? Does that guarantee your teenager won't have sex outside of marriage or something? Sorry, I have 6 teenage and adult kids and I somehow missed that parenting tip....
Posted by: Curiouser | September 1, 2008 2:57 PM | Report abuse
Thanks McCain for giving us Democrats the election!!! It baffles the mind that you could make such an impulsive, rash decision. Being a maverick is all fine and dandy but it only signals what type of president you would be --- a twin of Bush. As Obama stated ENOUGH. Its time for change.
Posted by: A - Chicago | September 1, 2008 2:57 PM | Report abuse
I fail to understand the political significance to this story. It cannot possibly have any measurable political impact.
AlanInMissoula pls email me at
Mark_in_Austin@gmail.com
All will be explained.
Posted by: MarkInAustin | September 1, 2008 2:57 PM | Report abuse
Children having sex out of wedlock? Birthing retarded children? If this is how the Palin's run their household they will do a right unstanding job in managing the "affairs" of the country. ;)
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 2:57 PM | Report abuse
The older daughter in that photo is Willow, not Bristol.
Posted by: JASmith | September 1, 2008 2:57 PM | Report abuse
Please stop calling Sarah Palin "trailer trash." She has been through a lot, and she obviously thinks she can handle a lot more. I think she is in over her head, though, and the abusive comments on this page are only a part of what she is going through right now.
The real question is why McCain thinks she is best suited to be second in command and ready to assume the presidency temporarily if he gets sick. This is an indication of his judgement, and I don't think he is capable of picking a good running mate. He glossed over more qualified candidates like Kay Bailey Hutchison to choose the young, inexperienced governor of a sparse state. This tells me a lot about his ability to make decisions. And she lied on Friday about not supporting the Bridge to Nowhere. Did McCain think these stories wouldn't get out? Or does he think we are a bunch of idiots who don't judge people by their qualifications and their positions? This whole thing reminds me of when Harriet Miers was nominated for the Supreme Court. Oh, and Monica Goodling, too. Conservative women who don't have the experience, and then they make things difficult for their entire party. Obama/Biden 2008. Kay Bailey Hutchison 2016.
Posted by: cbc | September 1, 2008 2:57 PM | Report abuse
If Palin had been the mother she should have her daughter would not be 17, pregnant and unwed.
Posted by: D Nadseb | September 1, 2008 2:57 PM | Report abuse
As a former teen mother myself (I'm now 36 and my daughter is 20), I do think a LOT of people will think negatively about this (both conservative and liberal).
I don't think Governor Palin is at fault (of course abstinence only doesn't work to keep kids from getting pregnant--that's what I had as well and it didn't work very good for me either).
However, I love how the conservatives seem to be rallying around this like it's admirable when you KNOW they would have cows if this were on the Democratic side rather than on the conservative side.
Should be interesting to see how this goes. I myself am just hoping that between Governor Palin's teen mother daughter and Obama's single young (not sure if she was a teen or not) mother who raised him, hope that the people who look down upon single mothers and teen mothers realize that the children will have a more difficult time, but that these children can still grow up to become successful, intelligent people.
My own daughter graduated high school, did NOT get pregnant (and has no plans on ever having a child until she's much older--if ever), has been working since she was 14, and now owns her own home. She's learned from my mistakes and I was happy to learn that Senator Obama, who has achieved so much in such a small amount of time, was also the child of a single mom.
Posted by: Stephanie | September 1, 2008 2:57 PM | Report abuse
a DNA test would prove who was the father and who was the mother.
Posted by: lawrence | September 1, 2008 2:56 PM | Report abuse
If McCain can't vet his own VP on such basic issues, how will he be able to assess those who are enemies of the U.S.?
Posted by: Marie Stewart | September 1, 2008 2:56 PM | Report abuse
Now, now Obamabots....where would you be if STANLEY hadn't been bold? A pregnacy out of wedlock in a inter racial relationship was hardly accepted norm in the 60's. But look what you got? Your saviour.
Get real you that think a 'stay at home' mom is better than a working one. And you call yourself Democrats!
This garbage about not teaching safe sex, how do you know? You can preach to any teenager about condoms, safe sex and even not having sex, but like all young people they don't believe it can happen to them. So to judge the parents by the kids is stupid.
Too bad you didn't'feel' this bad when you had the perfect candidate. Hillary. Go Palin, this Hillary Dem is behind you all the way!
For all you Roe v Wade worriers out there. For all you equal pay for equal work out there. Too bad! Looks like you will have to fight for those rights like us 'old' people did.
Posted by: Linda | September 1, 2008 2:56 PM | Report abuse
Pro-Truth, it took a few days for this story to come out so that the McCain campaign could use a natural disaster as cover for their media dump. Simply shameful.
Posted by: John M. | September 1, 2008 2:56 PM | Report abuse
I personally support unprotected premarital teen sex, and would like to know how I could get involved. I would appreciate it if the GOP could introduce me to some of these lovely young ladies.
Posted by: dr | September 1, 2008 2:56 PM | Report abuse
You gotta love the Republican "family values". I am all for supporting this teen mom, but I can only imagine the uproar from the conservatives if this were Obama's daughter.
Posted by: ALD | September 1, 2008 2:56 PM | Report abuse
Obama supporter here weighing in with my thoughts on the pregnancy matter: drop it!
If Sarah Palin says Trig is hers, so be it. And, her 17 year old daughter being pregnant is none of our business. Yes, it is unfortunate that she is in the limelight as a VP nominee's daughter but let's just back off and giver her the space she needs to have a healthy pregnancy and prepare for motherhood.
Sarah Palin is extremely unqualified to be vice president or president. I can't imagine any Hillary supporter switching to support Palin given her backwards views on issues important to progressive women such as choice, contraception, equal pay for equal work, evolution, global warming, energy, guns, you name it.
She seems like a nice enough woman to have as a neighbor or small town mayor but not the person I want to be one 72-year old cancer survivor heart beat away from being the most powerful person in the free world.
In other words, there are many reasons to oppose the McCain-Palin ticket; her daughter being pregnant need not be one of them. Let the family have their peace on this issue and let's discuss the real issues.
Here is a question for Sarah Palin: where do you differ with George W. Bush?
Posted by: Peninsula Matt | September 1, 2008 2:56 PM | Report abuse
Who is the father and how old is he???
Posted by: Steve | September 1, 2008 2:56 PM | Report abuse
Lying about the bridge to nowhere.
Lying about her pregnant daughter.
Working with Stevens on his 527.
Abusing her office for personal vendettas.
Maybe we should coin a new term here: "Morals of a Republican".
Example:
"She seemed OK at first, but it turned out she had the morals of a Republican."
Posted by: MorganaLeFay | September 1, 2008 2:56 PM | Report abuse
The age of consent is defined as 16 years old, according to Alaska statutory rape laws. If a person who is at least 18 years old engages in sexual activity with a person who is 16 years old or younger, he or she will be charged with sexual abuse of a minor in the first degree. This charge is a felony in Alaska. And remember, it does not matter if you did not force or threaten the other person into performing this sexual act with you. It is still a crime under Alaska statutory rape laws.
Any person who is 16 years old or older who has sexual intercourse with a minor who is 13-, 14-, or 15-years-old will be charged with sexual abuse of a minor in the second degree. Again, this charge is also a felony.
You can also be charged with a felony – sexual abuse in the third degree – if you are at least 16 years old and you have sex with anyone who is age 13-15, or if the person is a minor at least three years younger than you. In addition, Alaska statutory rape laws declare that anyone who is 18 years old or older who has sex with a person who is 16 or 17, or who is at least three years younger than the offender, can be charged with sexual abuse in the third degree. This is also a felony.
Alaska statutory rape laws carry punishments that include imprisonment and fines.
Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2008 2:56 PM | Report abuse
CABLE NEWS NETS CANNOT WALK AND CHEW GUM AT THE SAME TIME?
Has anyone else noticed that once the cable news networks commit to making the hurricane "THE" story, they refuse to shift gears and report on a story that's changing the landscape of the presidential race?
And you political reporters: Has it dawned on you yet that the real reason the GOP drastically cut back its schedule wasn't so much the hurricane, but the POLITICAL storm caused by the Palin Preggo Implosion?
And who's going to be first to reveal: Who's the Daddy? How old is he? And did he commit a statutory crime by putting Bristol in a family way?
Posted by: scrivener | September 1, 2008 2:55 PM | Report abuse
Obama should direct that no one involved with his campaign should make any comment on this matter, and he should make it publicly known that he will not tolerate any of his surrogates making any comment on it. It is a private matter and the Obama camp can only lose standing by commenting on it.
Posted by: Nick | September 1, 2008 2:55 PM | Report abuse
Look at the picture of the beautiful "all American" families on stage. But why doesn't McCain bring his adopted daughter from Bangladesh to his rallies. Is he afraid that because she is dark skinned he may offend some of the racist voters?
Posted by: Annette | September 1, 2008 2:55 PM | Report abuse
last week Palin said her daughter had MONO five months ago.
Now, we are to believe she GOT PREGNANT while having MONO at the same time??
Won't the baby be born with all sorts of life threatening defects?
OR-- is Sarah lying again?
Posted by: Bob | September 1, 2008 2:55 PM | Report abuse
Not surprising, Red States have the highest divorce rates, the highest abortion rates, the highest children born to unwed mothers, the highest rates of spousal abuse, the highest child abuse, alcoholism, drug abuse, and so on and so forth.
Republicans are Hypocrites and should look at themselves before pointing fingers at others.
Red states borrow the most from Blue states, have a lower per capita education and health spending rates and on and on....
My God, how some people deliberately want to wallow in ignorance and fool themselves, wake up America, GOP leaders are driving a stake through the heart of this great nation, wake up and see whats going around you, wake up and see the mess created by the GOP in the past 7 years....!!!
Posted by: Rick | September 1, 2008 2:55 PM | Report abuse
obamaniacs
Is this all you have to rail about?
You'll forget all about the grandbaby in your shock and devastation on E-day.
Thought it was bad with Kerry?
Posted by: viejo1 | September 1, 2008 2:55 PM | Report abuse
I listening to that the other day. It is long but worth listening to. She did what they say. The guy on the tape is stammering and stuttering as he tries to do her bidding. You know when she was elected mayor she fired people who didn't support her when she was running. It was such a small town scandal they tried to have a recall election but failed and she stayed in office. She is a small time petty creep no doubt it.
----------
BREAKING NEWS
AUDIO TAPE OF PALIN CHIEF OF STAFF SURFACES!!
http://www.gov.state.ak.us/audio/FrankBaileyCDaudio.mp3
(good stuff half way thru tape)
The tape, between her chief of staff, and public safety director PROVES Palin QUILTY of trying to get her ex-brother-in-law, (a state trooper) FIRED because he divorced her sister.
In the tape, Palin chief of state quotes PALIN as asking WHY the trooper has not been fired.
PALIN, currently under investigation by bipartisan group of Alaska legislators, faces IMPEACHMENT, if found guilty of attempting to get trooper fired.
PAILIN TO BE DEPOSED, UNDER OATH, NEXT WEEK.
Posted by: AUDIO TAPE SURFACES | September 1, 2008 2:51 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:55 PM | Report abuse
I for one was undecided in this race but to think that Mr McCain had it in is head that all Americans wanted was a woman any woman to make history I hope this backfires If it was under the assumption that a woman was needed, surely not one with the experience of Ms Palin that was a slap in the face. we wanted a qualified woman not one that in the middle of breast feeding and making doctors appointment makes decision that affect millions of people this a job that is little too much for her and I hope she will realize that and saves us all the problems in the near future ..
Posted by: d2j | September 1, 2008 2:55 PM | Report abuse
Bob H: "I see the lefties have decided to throw the election in favor of touting an ugly, tasteless, mean-spirited creepiness that can only repel ordinary humans of good will."
Oh, tell it to the Big Three in the right-wing mouthpiece game: Ann "Clinton masturbates in the sinks" Coulter, Rush "My maid bought me oxy" Limbaugh, and Bill Felafel O'Reilly.
Talk about creepy. One can just imagine the sewage they'd spew if the shoe were on the other foot.
Spekaing of pregnancy: one might, in fact, imagine that humans of good will would understand that not everyone - even if religious - views a just-fertilized egg as the equivalent of a fully-formed human, and that a woman who'd been raped shouldn't be forced to carry a bit of protoplasm to term. Clearly, Palin thinks otherwise.
Posted by: mishi | September 1, 2008 2:55 PM | Report abuse
McCain may have roughly 30 million dollars to gamble in this campaign, while new supply is possible. He does so poorly with gambling instincts.
Would you trust McCain with control over 3 to 4 trillion dollars each year, mostly belonging to your future generations in this country?
That's what this election is about.
Let the Palin family have their peace, they deserve the most at this time.
Posted by: O. P. Neon | September 1, 2008 2:55 PM | Report abuse
apparently the word has gone out to all the dittoheads or whatever -- no matter what comes out, anything at all, it shall be spun positively and defended to the death.
Lack of international experience? She lives 70 miles from Russia!
Lack of administrative experience for anything larger than a medium-size city? She is a GOVERNOR!
and so on. Sen. Graham today actually said she is the most qualified person to step into the white house he can think of, no kidding, you can't make this stuff up.
So, moral turptitude in her family that would get the Clinton family hung from crosses? Well, she IS pro-life, so that's OK!
Posted by: charlie | September 1, 2008 2:55 PM | Report abuse
Having voted democrat for the past 5 elections I'm supporting mccain/palin this time. The Dem's solution to everything is to spend our way out of trouble. McCain is the right choice this election and what a brilliant political choice to choose an up an coming madam govenor to balance the ticket. McCains the real change candidate now. The Dem's got there ticket upside down. I'm pro choice but applaud Palin's selection as VP. Palin is closer to my family's values and lifestyle than any other candidate in this presidential election
Posted by: James from Maine | September 1, 2008 2:55 PM | Report abuse
Anonymous, I know that lots of people rely on nannies to raise their children, but if conservatives are going to attack the "it takes a village" theory and argue "it takes a family" instead, it seems a little hypocritical and sanctimonious to leave a special needs children with paid strangers while Palin is traveling the world.
Posted by: Jimbo | September 1, 2008 2:54 PM | Report abuse
McCain only met her once. That shows you exactly what he thinks about all of us, both democrats and republicans. He would entrust her to 300 million people as VP (a heartbeat away) after only meeting with her once! McCain you have insulted me twice. Once for having the audacity to think that I would vote for your ticket ONLY because you have a woman on it and then not thinking enough of American citizens to take your VP vetting responsibility seriously. This is beyond ridiculous, it is wreckless.
Posted by: Danielle | September 1, 2008 2:54 PM | Report abuse
Honesty:
My daughter is recovering from Mono.
I do not support the Bridge to Nowhere
I never tried to get my Brother-in-Law fired.
Posted by: Marie Stewart | September 1, 2008 2:54 PM | Report abuse
Great family values...
Posted by: Baz | September 1, 2008 2:54 PM | Report abuse
And this time I thought the daughter was just fat. She can't be running for office while a daughter is pregnant. McCain needs to boot her out because she has no place on the ticket now. Pregnancy = Problems. Do the right thing, fix your personal problems first before the country.
Posted by: Greg | September 1, 2008 2:54 PM | Report abuse
Why did it take so long for the campaign to be "forthright" about Bristol Palin's pregnancy? The fact that there was something to hide shows that this isn't just partisan mudslinging. No matter whether you're pro-life, pro-choice, Democrat, Republican, or Independent, I think it's pretty equal opportunity to be disgusted that a campaign thought it could pull the wool over the eyes of the public on this one.
By the way, the story about Palin giving a speech after leaking amniotic fluid and then taking an 8 hr flight back to Alaska to have Trig still smells like fish. Most women I know would have been hightailing it to the nearest hospital. Did Palin call her husband to tell him uhh...my water just broke...see you in 12 hours after the speech, after the flight. Is it realistic that her husband would have gone along with behavior that could obviously endanger the life of his wife and child? Really, really weird. Is this pregnancy #2 for Bristol?
Posted by: Pro-Truth | September 1, 2008 2:54 PM | Report abuse
All of a sudden right-wing Christians are saying it's OK to get knocked up when you're 17 and not married?
Wow.
Posted by: David | September 1, 2008 2:54 PM | Report abuse
McCAINS JUDGEMENT.
THIS IS A DISTRACTION ISN'T IT? WHEN YOU HAVE DISTRACTION IN THE HIGHEST OFFICE IN THE LAND IT HINDERS YOU FROM MAKING PROGRESS.
DIDN'T JOHN M. THINK THAT THIS ISSUE WILL BECOME A DISTRACTION TO HIS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT?
Posted by: fghatala | September 1, 2008 2:54 PM | Report abuse
Like the right wing operatives here posing as "real people", I don't think it will matter. Only a nation of Neanderthals would elect Wilfred Brimley and Annie Oakley over two bright talented dedicated and proven honest public servants.
I think we've evolved at least to the Cro-Magnon stage - from lowly fish that is.
Posted by: bill Carson | September 1, 2008 2:53 PM | Report abuse
The fact that this has ruffled so many liberal feathers reinforces the fact that Mccain made the right pick. Keep up with your ridiculous comments. You'll just continue to push more moderates like myself into the red column
Ahhnnnggggg! Wrong answer. The same logic dictates you would vote for Obama because McCain protested so much about Obama's perceived lack of experience.
If you want to vote for McCain then say he represents your thinking and your proud to vote for him. Nobody gets pushed. We are all pulled.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:53 PM | Report abuse
I'm getting really tired of being told how I would feel about hypothetical situations. Reality is not hypothetical, and I will make up my own mind about that, thank you.
I was wondering the other day why a woman with four children would have another one in her 40's. There might be a certain mentality at work here.
It's nice that the Palin family members are such ordinary people. Unfortunately, I do not want ordinary people running this country. I want exceptional people.
Posted by: feralboy12 | September 1, 2008 2:53 PM | Report abuse
the consolation that I have if McCain wins the presidency is that we will have at least great entertainment a la britney and her sis with Bristol teen pregnancy and forced into marriage.
Posted by: neo | September 1, 2008 2:53 PM | Report abuse
It isn't news that Bristol is pregnant - teen age girls get pregnant without benefit of matrimony all the time: that's "dog bites man" territory.
Much hay will be made of the fact that Palin the elder, who supports abstinence as an exclusive form of birth control, couldn't govern her own daughter's behavior, but that's not news either.
The news is "the judgement thing", McCain's judgement.
He says he knew that Bristol was pregnant when he offered her the VP slot, and did so anyway. What EXACTLY was he thinking?
He was obviously not thinking of the attention this would draw away from the real issues he says he cares about so much.
Did he worry at all about the dissonance between Palin's hard line positions and the far more human reality of her family drama? Or what it woyuld do to Palin's family? Have the vetted Bristol's husband to be? Is that poor kid ready for his close up?
And did McCain consider what the Karl Rove Republican's, those who engineer campaigns to mercilessly win at any cost, would think about a Presidential candidate who choose an reproductive rights opponent with a pregnant daughter, and then allowed circumstances to force their announcement?? (And please... no one is buying the "squash the rumors about Trig's real mother" line - was there ever a more pathetic cover story?).
No, the real news is the the judgement thing, the same judgement thing that led McCain to chose, after a total of 75 minutes of conversation (15 minutes at the Governer's convention in February plus a 60 minute cell phone call), a Governor with 20 months of experience, who had previously been the mayor of her home town of 6,500 or so. He threw the dice.
The American people are very generous with public officials, but the voters of Ohio and Pennsylvania and Michigan are making up their minds, one person at a time.
Maverick?
Maniac.
Posted by: johnzero | September 1, 2008 2:53 PM | Report abuse
First, do we not have enough to do that we attack each other and say hateful things about strangers we've never met? I don't think that's being a good Democrat or a good Republican or a good American for that matter.
Its become impossible to raise a valid point about ANYONE without being labeled a racist, sexist, baby-killer, religious zealot, or worse!
Try stepping away from the energy and hype created by each party and realize that whether you align yourself Left, Middle, or Right the people feeding you non-stop information have much to gain by you siding with them! The Presidency leads to power and all the the cronies around both candidates stand to gain or lose right along with their nominee.
Bottom line: Stop insulting and hating each other! Furthermore, leave God out of it. He---regardless of the name of the Book you read or what you call Him--has urged all of us to care for one another and not to judge.
Absolutely stand for what you believe in. Use your energy to make your community better. Vote. But leave the negativity OUT. Those who would love to see America and its people fail must enjoy every minute of us tearing each other apart like this.
Posted by: Concerned American | September 1, 2008 2:53 PM | Report abuse
Can a ditto head on here please tell me why McCain picked Palin, who has no experience, and is obviously a crappy mother, instead of any number of qualified highly experienced Republican women- like Condaleeza Rice??
Or was this pick just so that if he gets elected he can be surrounded by beauty queens while Rome burns?
Posted by: Karin | September 1, 2008 2:53 PM | Report abuse
only sarah and todd and their family know what went into making this decision. I pray that their family has the stamina and love to sustain them thru all the criticism they receive. We should all be praying for them and our country.
Posted by: judster | September 1, 2008 2:53 PM | Report abuse
So lets see if Bristol has this baby in December.
Posted by: juicy | September 1, 2008 2:52 PM | Report abuse
Along with Biden's well-documented plagiarism and Barack's admitted cocaine use, the Palin saga will only underscore that timeless question we Americans love to pose to the rest of the world: Is this a great country, or what?!?
Posted by: wingedwheel | September 1, 2008 2:52 PM | Report abuse
I want to know everything that is available to know, about the future leaders of our country !
Gov. Palin, your 17 year old daughter is our business, expecially when you bring her on the campaign trail.
Senator Mccain, the fact that you cheated on your ex-wife is our business, especially when you talk about "judment to lead".
Senator Obama, the people you surround yourself with "is" our business, especially when you will lead this country and hire thousands of people to work in our goverment.
Candidates, listen up !!! We have the right to know about you, your family, your friends, your business, your life so get used to it, or get out of national politics!
Posted by: Kent - Pebble Beach, CA | September 1, 2008 2:52 PM | Report abuse
As an atheist father of 2 children (19 & 22), I always get a bit of a kick out of the drama that bible thumpers families have. When evangelicals would learn of my lack of belief they would always look at my children with pity and loathing.
Rasing children is not an easy task, but being religious does not provide any guaratnees and being raised in an non-religious enviornment doesn't lead to ruin.
If my daughter was pregnant I would stand by her, but I would in no way subject her to public scrutinny for my ambition. Sarah Palin decision to accept McCain's nomination shows she has as little sense as McCain does for picking her.
They deserve each other.
Posted by: Duff | September 1, 2008 2:52 PM | Report abuse
Trig Palin was born on 4/18/08. That gives Bristol just enough time to be in her fifth month of a new pregnancy. Just because Bristol is pregnant now, doesn't mean she wasn't pregnant before.
Posted by: Publius | September 1, 2008 2:52 PM | Report abuse
so much for the "liberal left"... you would think the far right would be upset.
Didn't Obama's mother have him when she was 17??? hypocritical
from an independent that has voted democratic in each election ...except this one...
Posted by: anthony | September 1, 2008 2:52 PM | Report abuse
Lol Casey, presidential scholars agree she's the least qualified pick in more than a century. Good luck selling that trash outside the Evangelical base.
Posted by: John M. | September 1, 2008 2:52 PM | Report abuse
Can you be a red neck in Alaska? I mean, there's not enough sun there to turn your neck bright red in the summertime...
Posted by: lol | September 1, 2008 2:52 PM | Report abuse
This would have never have happened if Sarah would have just stayed home with her children and not have been so blinded with her ambition. Who and the hell does Sarah Palin think she is?
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 2:52 PM | Report abuse
The problem is that when you put Bristol's teenage, out-of-wedlock pregancy together with some of the more sordid details of "Troopergate" -- the alleged death threat from Palin's brother-in-law, him tasering his 10-year-old stepson, Palin standing outside her sister's house and peeping through the window while she battled with her husband, etc. -- the Palin family is starting to resemble an Alaskan version of "Tobacco Road."
It's a nasty phrase, but I heard it a lot when I was growing up in Dixie: Poor White Trash.
Carter had to deal with it, thanks to his brother. Clinton managed to overcome it, despite his. But don't kid yourself: It's not a political plus. If the label starts to stick to the Palin clan down here in the lower 48, it is going to hurt.
Posted by: Peter Principle | September 1, 2008 2:52 PM | Report abuse
Let's see: if a Democrat has sex, it ends his political viability. He's humiliated and must step down.
If a Republican has sex -- outside marriage, inside a men's restroom, out of wedlock -- it's a private matter or a youthful indiscretion or a wide stance. He must press forward, the better for dealing with life.
Here's what the Anchorage Daily News wrote about Trig's birth: He was a month early, and even Palin's spokeswoman was surprised. Also, he was named "Van Palin" because it rhymes with the rock band.
"Alaska Gov. Palin flies home from Texas in time to give birth
By Kyle Hopkins
ANCHORAGE, Alaska _Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin gave birth to her fifth child at 6:30 a.m. Friday, after flying home from a conference in Texas to have the baby boy at Mat-Su Regional Medical Center.
Meet Trig Paxson Van Palin. He's 6 pounds, 2 ounces, and about a month early.
"It was quite a surprise," said Palin spokeswoman Sharon Leighow.
Palin and her husband, Todd, had been in Texas since Tuesday for a Republican Governors Association convention, Leighow said.
The Palin family issued a statement that read: "Trig is beautiful and already adored by us. We knew through early testing he would face special challenges, and we feel privileged that God would entrust us with this gift and allow us unspeakable joy as he entered our lives."
Asked what special challenges the family was referring to, Leighow said, "It's a family matter, and that information should come from the governor herself."
Leighow said Palin and her son were healthy and resting comfortably Friday.
The sequence of events surrounding the labor was unclear.
An announcement from the state said that Palin's "labor began (Thursday) while she was in Texas at the governor's energy conference, where she gave the keynote luncheon address, but let up enough for her to travel on Alaska Airlines back to Alaska in time to deliver her second son."
Leighow said she doesn't know when Palin's contractions began and said the governor would have to answer why she chose to fly back to Alaska for the delivery.
Palin's parents, Chuck and Sally Heath, declined to be interviewed.
Like the rest of Alaskans, Leighow said, she learned the baby's name on Friday.
.......
And finally: "We've always liked the middle name Van because, you know, growing up in the '80s, Van Palin would be a really cool name," Palin joked to a Daily News reporter earlier this year in a reference to the rock band Van Halen."
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:52 PM | Report abuse
PALIN IS AMBITIOUS TRASH WHO WANTS TO BE IN THE POSITION OF TEACHING US HOW TO LIVE! GO AWAYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:51 PM | Report abuse
The fact that the VP noms' teenage daughter is pregnant is not particularly relevant; not as relevant as McCain's flawed rationale in his selection of a running mate.
If the McCain camp thinks Mrs. Palin is going to secure the Hillary malcontents, they're probably wrong. If Palin's platform resembled Clinton's, they may have lured those votes, but it does not. They are very different people. Very different politicians.
I heard McCain met Palin only one time before she became his pick. That's absurd. And who in the United States (other than Alaskans) knew who this person was before Friday morning? While she is accomplished (runner up – Ms. Alaska, excellent fisher-person, hockey mom, and governor of the largest, least populated states in the non-contiguous union) she would not have made the first cut in the Republican primary.
McCain should have found a middle-ground running mate - one who the might have been deemed as acceptable to democrat voters as well - like Ron Paul or perhaps Joe Lieberman.
I think Mrs. Palin ought to be very busy in the next several years, raising her young children and helping to raise her grandchild. That's not to say a woman's place is in the home, but she has some very important commitments there, and becoming the Vice President of the United States might be a bit overwhelming.
If McCain becomes POTUSA, for all our sake, I hope Mrs. Palin becomes an outspoken and effective advocate for a number of causes, such as bringing troops back from Iraq, support planned parenthood and educational initiatives aimed at curbing teen pregnancy, research and aide programs for individuals and families of the the mentally handicapped, the elderly and the disabled.
It seems to me, she has a personal stake in all of these.
Posted by: FJAY | September 1, 2008 2:51 PM | Report abuse
So what is this then?
http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewPicture&friendID=63524358
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:51 PM | Report abuse
This is why family values don't work. Abort the baby and erase your mistakes.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:51 PM | Report abuse
ALARM BELLS SHOULD BE GOING OFF . . . ! . BEWARE, BEWARE, most of the dirt one reads about Sarah Palin comes from the Republicans.
I would suggest that one not get so cocky over this out of wedlock pregnancy. . . . . . "Jesus forgives & Sarah Palin is standing by her daughter." The Republicans would love for Democrats to attack that. . . . BEWARE, BEWARE, that bait has a hook in it.
Better not be seen beating up on the Republican Goddess.
I would suggest that true Democrats are very, very careful not to touch the goddess without very good proof.
IF IT IS UNSUBSTANTIATED, you can be 90% sure it's from the Republican mind screw machine . . . who want ever so much for the Democrats to make a faulty move toward their goddess. . . . . . . . The cutest thing this side of Paris Hilton.
Posted by: Coldcomfort | September 1, 2008 2:51 PM | Report abuse
I feel so sorry for that teenage girl! It's hard enough for her to be in that situation - now the whole world is involved. Poor thing.
Posted by: Sarah | September 1, 2008 2:51 PM | Report abuse
Look at the number of posts. In half an hour.
This is not going away.
Posted by: Marie Stewart | September 1, 2008 2:51 PM | Report abuse
I always find it quite interesting that conservatives refer to liberals as "mean" or "hateful" etc. Especially, when there seems to be a problem with one of their own and the neo-con family values.
I think that McCain's new platform slogan should be: Hypocrisies... There's New Ones Everyday.
Posted by: Jeana | September 1, 2008 2:51 PM | Report abuse
IS THIS A SOAP. GROW UP LITTLE CHILDREN AND THAT INCLUDES THE NEWS MEDIA.
WE'RE TRYING TO PICK SOMEONE WHO CAN RUN THE COUNTRY. PALIN HAS MORE EXPERIENCE *NOTE EXPERIENCE THAN ALL 3 OF THE OTHERS PUT TOGETHER.
IS EVERYONE IN AMERICA A MORON?? (PERSON OF LESSOR INTELLIGENCE)
FORGET THE SOAP
CASEY PURVIS
WCP@EARTHLING.NET
Posted by: CASEY | September 1, 2008 2:51 PM | Report abuse
I am amazed at the hate being published here. It's almost as if everyone posting here has perfect teenagers and perfect families.. Amazing...Stepford wives only, please.
Posted by: GApeach | September 1, 2008 2:51 PM | Report abuse
Her whole selling point was the wholesome family story, "Mother knows best" so to speak. That is out the window. Now instead they are stuck dealing with this. Make no mistake, she is going to be asked about this in every news conference and town hall meeting. As more come out we are going to see she is not what she appears. People who know her don't all love her. They tried to have her recalled as mayor she was so bad. Her mother in law is on record saying she is not qualified and she will be voting for Obama.
---------
I think Chris Cillizza is correct. Gov Palin is likely to get alot of sympathy for attacks on her family. It makes me sad for her kids. Unfortunately, the McCain Campaign presented as part of her qualifications that she was a mother of five. She, and McCain, have put her family out there to be judged for political gain. I'm revolted by this. No good can come of it.
Posted by: worried | September 1, 2008 2:46 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:51 PM | Report abuse
BREAKING NEWS
AUDIO TAPE OF PALIN CHIEF OF STAFF SURFACES!!
http://www.gov.state.ak.us/audio/FrankBaileyCDaudio.mp3
(good stuff half way thru tape)
The tape, between her chief of staff, and public safety director PROVES Palin QUILTY of trying to get her ex-brother-in-law, (a state trooper) FIRED because he divorced her sister.
In the tape, Palin chief of state quotes PALIN as asking WHY the trooper has not been fired.
PALIN, currently under investigation by bipartisan group of Alaska legislators, faces IMPEACHMENT, if found guilty of attempting to get trooper fired.
PAILIN TO BE DEPOSED, UNDER OATH, NEXT WEEK.
Posted by: AUDIO TAPE SURFACES | September 1, 2008 2:51 PM | Report abuse
Tone deaf - that's what you dems are and that's why you lose presidential elections over and over again... 2 winners in 40 years-- This is obviously not a good thing. I have to grant them: Republicans certainly know how to run their elections (although currently even that may be in doubt)-- it's WHEN they get elected they have ABSOLUTELY no clue as to how to govern--NO Clue-- if they figured out how to govern....till then I have to go with the safe and sane choice: Senator Obama
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:50 PM | Report abuse
This a typical Republican 'family value' issue. Out of wed lock teenage preganancy is hailed as something great pro life strategy. What a travesty!!!. The Governor was busy governing the State; but she is a total failure inculcating values amoung her children. Her teenage girl should be in school concentrating on her studies, not in the hospital delivering and caring for a baby. That is irresponsible on the part of the Republican Vice Presidential candidate.
Posted by: TJ | September 1, 2008 2:50 PM | Report abuse
The baby is likely to come right around the time of inauguration, and the McCain camp "hoped it could be kept private"? Are they on drugs? We're hearing about 30-year-old parking tickets Obama had, for crying out loud.
Posted by: John M. | September 1, 2008 2:50 PM | Report abuse
I'll really believe Bristol's pregnant if she delivers. I think she's going to "miscarry" days after the November election.
And even if Sarah is Trig's mom, that means she's so ambitious she risked the baby's life by flying while in labor. No OBGYN would ever allow someone of advanced maternal age, pregnant with a Down's baby, leaking amniotic fluid, to take even a short flight. Either she's a liar, or she puts her political career above the health of her unborn child.
Posted by: KJ | September 1, 2008 2:50 PM | Report abuse
"It will be a test to see what kind of command and control Obama has over his internet blogger legions."
I think Obama already failed that test ages ago by allowing Huffington and DailyKos -- which are arms of the Obama campaign itself -- to turn into virtual pro-Obama hate toilets.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:50 PM | Report abuse
Nothing stopped the most of you least-ways the Christians from voting for Cheney. His daughter is a Lesbian. That's an immediate sentence to hell for that decision. There's absolutely nothing in the bible saying you can't have sex before you're married, only to not cheat on someone if you do get married.
Posted by: anon | September 1, 2008 2:50 PM | Report abuse
I believe most of you have lost touch as to the role a vice president takes in an administration. Palin is overly qualified, seeing as how she is the only name on the ticket with any executive experience. Also, who the hell are you to judge a woman with five children on parenting skills. The statement, "this is not the America I know," makes me sick. For once can we vote on issues and not the sex life of a vice president candidate's daughter. Get a life, turn off your cnn, put down your people magazine, and realize the importance of real issues at stake in this election.
Posted by: Josh | September 1, 2008 2:50 PM | Report abuse
America is at a cross roads-- and this election needs to be about the issues facing this Country. Senator Obama is the only candidate remaining who has a clue how to fix the mess in which we find ourselves.
My heart does go out to Bristol Palin and I do hope that she weathers this very public storm that has hit her innocent young life. I will do what I can to minimize this public spectacle.
Please let the family of Governor Palin deal with this intensely private family matter. We don't need to dwell on it, focus on it, or otherwise consider it. It does not matter if we are Democrats, Independents or Republicans, as decent Americans, we can all leave this one alone.
Posted by: Kim | September 1, 2008 2:49 PM | Report abuse
4. Palin's nature conservation statement is "Shoot the moose, make a burger". She is trying to get the votes of all mooseburger lovers in the United States by declaring over and over again how much she likes mooseburger. Wow, Obama should be afraid now since all the mooseburger fans are going to flock to McCain's camp.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Careful. I'm voting for Obama and love Moose. I have had moose steaks baked in brown gravy for 8 hours. You could cut the meat with a feather and was oh so good!!
They eat good in Alaska. No doubt about it. Irrespective of their politics!!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:49 PM | Report abuse
The fact that this has ruffled so many liberal feathers reinforces the fact that Mccain made the right pick. Keep up with your ridiculous comments. You'll just continue to push more moderates like myself into the red column.
Posted by: funnygal | September 1, 2008 2:49 PM | Report abuse
Everyone who supports Obama/Biden respects Gov. Sarah Palin and her family.
Everyone who supports Obama knows that his campaign has traveled across the country with a positive message despite negative ads against all Democrats, Obama, his family, and his message of "Change we can believe in" and hope.
Obama supporters do not believe in negative attacks on anyone's family. We will continue to stick to the issues. The contrasts are clear by now between both parties. This election will be won on these issues.
The Republican's believe that negative ads will win it for them. Look who running McCain's campaign. Look at the swift boaters. Even some of their talk show pundits are saying that Democrats have to sling mud and fight them. The Democrat experts know how to deal with the Republican attack machine and swift boaters.
Any Republican smear posters attempting to pose as Democrats we can tell by the outrageous personal attacks. They tried to do the same by posing as Hillary supporters on comment sections to stir up trouble.
We will continue to run with Obama's message of "Change we can believe in" and Hope backed up by friends and allies.
Obama/Biden '08
Posted by: Cooday | September 1, 2008 2:49 PM | Report abuse
Keep it up democrats. You lose more and more woman with your blatant sexism and double standards.
Obama's treatment of Hillary pushed me to McCain. This savaging of Palin and her daughter means I will never vote democratic again.
Goodbye and good riddance.
Posted by: Hillary2012 | September 1, 2008 2:49 PM | Report abuse
How can anyone be proud of teenager preganancy? Be honest! Love is unconditional, pround is not.
I like you, Sarah Palin. But could you take care of your kids better? Does your daughter really have a choice?
Bristol, I wish you the best.
I am a mom of two, working full time.
Posted by: Erica L. | September 1, 2008 2:49 PM | Report abuse
Marriage is one of the finest thing in the life.. many conservatives, this is once in life and is a beautiful thing.. for liberals.. its many a times in life and hence they do not understand the value and lack the fundamental values "love".. they only know "Change"... no wonder why they blog nasty :-)
Posted by: mitchell | September 1, 2008 2:49 PM | Report abuse
Stop all the speculation, the whole this is a set-up for McCain to pick the candidate he wanted in the beginning. This extra is just being added so that "when" she steps down it will look like I have to take care of my family first and all will walk away looking like Saints leaving McCain to choose the VP he really wants. When will America stop being brainwashed by the media. Politicians know that a majority of the country can't think for themselves which is why they make attack ads and pick the most unlikely candidates. Wake up people, your being had.
Posted by: ILuv2read | September 1, 2008 2:49 PM | Report abuse
She pledges to marry the father.Does he have any say in this, or are mom and dad gonna break out the shotguns,frontier style?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:49 PM | Report abuse
As an 18 year old and a first time voter, I also can see this in another perspective. Big Political Leaders tend to make extreme decisions to keep their image flawless. So how do we know that Bristol's parents didn't force her to keep the baby and now marry the father-to-be in order to keep their platform and their beliefs forced?? Sometimes the children have different understandings and beliefs than their parents. However, when it comes to being political leaders, that cant be the case. I can understand the frustration that parents have with their children especially because we are becoming more aware of ourselves on our own risk. And unfortunately, when a high profiled person's personal life becomes exposed they have to fix the situation to their advantage.
Posted by: Damaris | September 1, 2008 2:49 PM | Report abuse
If the Pubs want to start complaining about bloggers Obama doesn't control, I'll start complaining about blog discussions *on McCain's own site* about whether Obama is the Antichrist.
Posted by: John M. | September 1, 2008 2:48 PM | Report abuse
I thought the daughter was away somewhere recovering from Mono, 5 months ago.
Posted by: Mr Unite Us | September 1, 2008 2:48 PM | Report abuse
One of McCain's senior campaign advisors said, "We had hoped this would be an issue that was private. That the family could deal with this issue privately."
What planet are these guys on? Rightly or wrongly, a VP's daughter getting pregnant at 17 was goingt to be a HUGE news story.
Have these guys lost it, or what? They said McCain knew. He was actually hoping no one would talk about it? At best, he can say he wanted to start a national discussion.
Posted by: They're Delusional | September 1, 2008 2:48 PM | Report abuse
Echoes of sexual indiscretions from past elections. Who has stolen the Family Values party and how do we get it back?
Posted by: Concerned supporter | September 1, 2008 2:48 PM | Report abuse
seems the baby story is dead (except for some who won't let it or the world trade center go). But what if the 17 year old had decided the pressure of having a child was too much and had an abortion. would mom have advocated jailing her, or, like McCain, have said that's her decision? that, and the anti sex education angle, are the issues.
so that takes care of the family values issue. I'll give her a pass on having a fifth child at her age with the risk of Downs, but with four kids already it's close. needing a basketball team is a bit thin.
and how exactly do we explain McCain's thing for beauty queens? a trophy wife is just cliche. a trophy VP is a whole new deal. and what about the mindset of a female who doesn't see beauty pageants as making women sex objects? or maybe she does? that should get lots of Hillary voters. not.
that leaves being anti corruption reformer? There's being the head of the corrupt Stevens 527 group that McCain thinks is the evil side effect of his stupid campaign reform bill he now opposes. but having more ethics complaints against others than have been filed against you isn't quite the measure. she was even warned that her pressure on Monegan was improper. she stands up to corruption? she fired the guy who stood up to hers, and then lied about it. there were plenty of proper ways to nail the SOB brother in law, why didn't she use them. she certainly had some clout, why not use it properly? and admit it?
against waste and earmarks? she was for the bridge and the timing of the earmark, and when that became a scandal, kept the money anyway. she didn't say no thanks to the money.
and on the same subject, wasted state funds to save a politically popular dairy that deserved to fail. so much for conservative free market principles or new politics.
that leaves the fact that she admits knowing nothing about foreign policy in general or the war in Iraq in particular.
so that leaves her experience of 18 months running a state with the population smaller than most counties in the lower 48 that doesn't have to have any taxes to raise or budget to balance (the tough decision is how much to give back to the people cause even a democrat couldn't spend all the oil revenue). so she has less responsibility over fewer people than the average county executive who has to balance a budget on local and property taxes. Doug Duncan could not have run for President after running Montgomery County (which I believe has more people than Alaska), and he had a tougher job.
before that she was mayor of a town smaller than my high school.
and she was picked to pander to the creationist evangelicals and wants to teach Genesis as science in our schools. that's not a maverick, it's a wimp.
did I leave anything out?
Posted by: JoeT | September 1, 2008 2:48 PM | Report abuse
This here news perfectly encapsulates everything the Republicans really are - HYPOCRITES.
Posted by: Rick | September 1, 2008 2:48 PM | Report abuse
To add to the spin I could just imagine what would be said by the media, and the so-called "social-conservatives" if the roles were reversed here. Joe Biden's unwed daughter pregnant?? Media field day! When are we going to drop the talking points and actually have open forums and discussions on morality? I can tell you that we understand a lot more about the subject today than most anybody did 2000+ years ago... Some of us in America need to read more than just one book.
Posted by: B-Rad | September 1, 2008 2:48 PM | Report abuse
I'm so pleased to hear that Bristol is pregnant. That means one more honest Republican in the world eager to fight the mindless hordes of un-Americans.
Posted by: Godless sinner | September 1, 2008 2:48 PM | Report abuse
It would be nice if just one high-profile, pregnant teenager announced that she was giving her baby up for adoption. Marriage at 17 is very hard and not likely to be successful, which hurts the child as well as both of the parents.
Posted by: Eileen | September 1, 2008 2:48 PM | Report abuse
I didn't care if Trig was her son or her grandson. However, what does give me pause is her taking a risk with her life and her child's life by taking an 8 hour flight back to Alaska after her water had broken at 4am, after she'd given the keynote speech at the Republican Governors Assn convention, without telling the flight staff she was in labor or even in an advanced state of pregnancy. And then she drove another 45 minutes to get to a regional medical center w/o a neonatal intensive care unit instead of giving birth at a better equipped hospital in Anchorage. This despite the fact that it was a high risk pregnancy - her amniotic fluid began to leak ONE MONTH before her due date, she is in her mid 40s, she'd had 4 previous pregnancies, the child was already diagnosed as having down's syndrome, and she did NOTHING to ensure the child's or her safety except cross her legs so that she could give her speech and so that the kid would be born in Alaska. This woman is pathetic. Talk about calculated political moves.
Posted by: Chris | September 1, 2008 2:48 PM | Report abuse
I definitely think McCain chose Palin to get the angry Hillary supporters who only cared about the fact that she is a woman. It could backfire, but it's also gutsy in seizing the opportunity to get more votes. I'm a moderate with liberal social views, but I do believe she's a smart, strong woman with convictions. However ,realistically I cannot fathom how she thinks she can have it all given her circumstances. Children need time with their parents, and we only have 24-hours in a day. Obviously she will have lots of help, but everyone I know who grew up with nannies resent the fact that their parent/s put other people ahead of them. Palin has a choice here, to serve the American public and her shot at making history, or being there for her children. I do believe women can do anything men can, but nobody can have it all at once and do it well, no matter how much money you have and day-care you can afford.
If this happend to Obama's daughter at 17, the Rublicans would have a field day. It's hypocritical of them to call Dems"Marxists" (see post below) and equating all Dems as extreme liberals. Obama had nothing to do with the slander, and once again the conservative right fails to see the light. Palin's daughter should be given the privacy given to Chelsea Clinton, and I think the McCain camp should have kept silent on this. They have now fueled the flame. As far as getting married, it's a mistake. You don't have to be married to be good parents. I know plenty of married people who mess up their kids. Statistics show the younger you are the great chances of divorce.So in the end what's the point? To prove you're morally superior to those who want to avoid divorce??? Please.
Posted by: Kara | September 1, 2008 2:48 PM | Report abuse
Can't assess whether or not she'd be a good Commander In Chief, but she sure as heck makes a good MILF In Chief!
Posted by: can't assess | September 1, 2008 2:48 PM | Report abuse
I could careless about a healthy 17 yr old making A CHOICE...
what bother me...
A woman... 44 years... Educated, Articulate and Accomplished...
lacking even the basic understanding of Birth Control...
That she would CHOOSE to to get pregnant at that age, having the knowledge of years and years of scientific research.. that clearly indicates...
The risk of severe birth defects occurring in pregnant women over the age of 35 is considerably higher....
Who cares that she decided to have the baby AFTER she conceived... she is an admitted Pro Lifer.. even with a confirmed pre-natal test of Down Syndrome, it was her choice... CHOICE...
Her decision making prior to her conceiving is what should be questioned...
but then she CHOOSE to Gambled the health of her possible un-born child not to mention possibly placing herself at risk..
someone that exhibits this type of decision making must be considered very very carefully.... especially when they would be next in line to hold the most powerful job in the free world....
Posted by: Talontbo | September 1, 2008 2:48 PM | Report abuse
to JOJO
In response to your posting I would first like to say wow. Not only are your arguments invalid and idiotic you fail to string together complete sentences.ALSO ALL CAPSS LOCKS!!!!!1. Impulsive choice how the hell do you know? your not john McCain.2. Vepe with no experiance....really and the Dem. canitades have soooo much more!3. He had cancer he doesnt anymore way to be intolerante of people with cancer.4 its a hurricaine I dont care atleast people there are actually leaving this time.5. How dare you bring in a teens life into your politics. Didnt Barack say that his family is off limits? well it works both ways. Its not like some politisions themselves have ever had sex!You are the reason why people are about to elect the next Jimmy Carter.
Posted by: andyp | September 1, 2008 2:47 PM | Report abuse
Sarah Palin says:
"We're proud of Bristol's decision to have her baby". Yet Palin is against a women's right to decide anything. She wants to make abortion illegal in all cases, even the health of the mother. I am not going to judge the family on this pregnancy, but I am definitely against the McCain/Palin position against a woman's right to choose.
Posted by: Jake | September 1, 2008 2:47 PM | Report abuse
What kind of mother would expose her child to this and then ask the media to respect her privacy. She had to know this would happen. Just wait until the media finishes up with this Hurricane diaster, poor Bristol. Please Gov withdrawal for your child'ssake.
Posted by: Brenda | September 1, 2008 2:47 PM | Report abuse
Bristol Palin's pregnancy is a non-issue. The media should just not write about it.
Sarah Palin's political perspectives and capabilities are fair game.
Posted by: jrob822 | September 1, 2008 2:47 PM | Report abuse
"You seem to be saying that the Palins should be hiding and hanging their heads in shame."
No, they should have said, thank you, but our family is too important to us right now.
"I find it highly coincidental that many of the comments here, are the same comments posted on various other leftwing blogs.'
Maybe it's just the logical conclusion...
Posted by: kreuz_missile | September 1, 2008 2:47 PM | Report abuse
"Um, Sarah, you could have just released your own medical records and let your daughter have her privacy.
Just a thought."
Here's another though. Come December, there is going to be this new baby. Are they supposed to pretend they found it in a cabbage patch, or that the stork brought it? In the meanwhile, Bristol will look more pregnant than she does now, fanning the flames of lurid speculation.
Posted by: jspivey | September 1, 2008 2:47 PM | Report abuse
We're Dems and we're repulsed by the ignorant comments here
First, Obama has NO experience managing anything [except that disastrous annenberg thing]
He hasn't even completed one term as Senator, and much of that has been spent campaigning, and the rest was spent abstaining from votes.
Obama and Dems are irresponsible thinking he is ready to govern this country.
Palin has more governing experience and she's not even running for the Presidency.
For all so touchingly concerned about who will raise her kids, who will raise Obama's kids? He'd have less time as Pres than she would as VP. His wife works, too. Michelle No-bama can thank Hillary Clinton for paving the way for no one giving her a hard time for being a working First Lady.
Stop the masquerade. You misogynists simply are too spineless and threatened by a woman in power. You will find any excuse to rip her. Even if those criticisms apply two-fold to Obama.
First you said any woman but Clinton. Now you rip this one, too.
Ignorant, weak people.
Posted by: Dumb people | September 1, 2008 2:47 PM | Report abuse
It's a trap. Obama best not step in it. The abortion/feminist/family values toe popper will rip his leg off.
It will be a test to see what kind of command and control Obama has over his internet blogger legions.
Any attack on a non-combatant daughter (Chelsea) will irk the Evangelicals, women, monthers, and Limbaugh (ha!). Sarah will be martyred, if the Dems are stupid enough to touch it.
Posted by: Holman | September 1, 2008 2:47 PM | Report abuse
I don't have problem with Palin's 17 year old daughter getting pregnant. Life happens! But for god sakes it seems that she's being forced to get married in order to fulfill her mother's conservative agenda. Mrs. Palin really needs to take a big step back and concentrate on her family, especially her infant son and her pregnant daughter. In doing so she will being walking the walk and talking the talk on dealing with family problems and family values.
Posted by: Steve in Northbrook | September 1, 2008 2:47 PM | Report abuse
What kind of hillbilly has a baby at the age of 44 and is surprised that it has Down's syndrome? The odds are 1 in 12 at that age! If these were liberals they would be getting slammed mercilessly by the right wing geniuses that have gotten us into the unbelieveable mess we are in.
Posted by: duh | September 1, 2008 2:47 PM | Report abuse
Being a good mother, Governor Palin would be wise to step down from her VP candidacy to help her young daughter during this pregnancy, and her own infant son. Conservative Republican mothers like myself believe, while Palin is talented, that someone else like Pawlenty or Huckabee, can devote more professional time to the office of Vice-President.
Posted by: Mary in PA | September 1, 2008 2:47 PM | Report abuse
Real classy family.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:47 PM | Report abuse
WOW!!!!
Sarah Palin and John McCain have brought America to swampy lows we havent ever seen before, even under DUBYA and his gang of thugs.
I think all of America feels sorry for Bristol. The poor girl never stood a chance with a mother that never gave her access to sex education, contraception or anything beyond "abstinence"....
SEE HOW EFFECTIVE that sort of denial is America??? it doesnt work so well.
If her skills to be VP are anything like her mothering skills, we should be very, very AFRAID.
Bristol---We are so sorry your parents let you down like this. You dont have to marry some stooge and ruin your life at 16 honey. This is America...you do have options.
Posted by: misssymoto | September 1, 2008 2:47 PM | Report abuse
that isn't bristol in the picture, that's the other daughter
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:46 PM | Report abuse
I find it ironic, the "feminists" are all about cooking it up in the pan and doin the 9-5, hell we can do it all right? Now all of a sudden, She has kids with issues, AND she wants to pursue a career...can't be done? Why not? Because it doesn't work dips! For some select few, maybe, but for most of us, it's too much to ask. I think the left and the right have lost their grip. On one side we have, "Save the babies, tote your machine guns". "On the other, no guns, abort the babies."
I personally say gun control, and both parties must take responsibility for the pregnancy...and if someone walks without taking responsibility, that person goes to prison. end of story. Bye the way, clearly all men are off their rocker...i'll be writing in Hillary, she at least has it half right.
Posted by: ann | September 1, 2008 2:46 PM | Report abuse
The McCain campiagn is like a flippin' reality show... what the heck is going on?
I think the best thing to happen would be for Palin to just lay low and let her family be her family. She's got a 5 month old with special needs, a teenage daughter whose pregnant, and 3 other kids on top of all that. Plus, she's got this family problem with her sister and her brother-in-law. It's just too much.
Nothing against her. Lots of teens have sex and get pregnant...
But I know with my small family, I would never let myself go anywhere near a political campaign.
I even think Obama's kids are a little young for what they are going to have to deal with... But there are only 2 and they are older. But still.
I think McCain should have thought about Palin before using her as the young face of his campaign.
Posted by: blip | September 1, 2008 2:46 PM | Report abuse
Palin’s 17 year old unmarried daughter is pregnant. Religious right and conservative commentators are favorable and accepting of the situation. Jamie Spears unmarried teenager is pregnant, religious right is outraged and denounce “Hollywood” as immoral and poor family values. HYPOCRISY PERSONIFIED!!
Posted by: RK | September 1, 2008 2:46 PM | Report abuse
Any idea how old the father is? Have we heard. Is he a minor or an adult? Could this be statutory rape? No one is saying!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:46 PM | Report abuse
Hmmm imagine this scenario--Obama's black woman VP pick has 5 kids, one disabled, and a teenage pregnant daughter. Can you imagine how the Republicans,and Rush Limbaugh would be all over that one!!! I can guarantee there'd be lots of 'not ready to lead' commercials showing the black woman VP with a trail of kids following her.
But McCain's made it apparent he thinks the VP is only a part-time job for a working mom Gal Friday. So, he's ok with it.
The Palin's are OK. That baby will be loved, of course. It's the hypocrisy of and nasty comments/e-mails I've endured from all my lily-white Christian-right relatives that I'm gloating over right now.
Posted by: Katherine | September 1, 2008 2:46 PM | Report abuse
I'm happy to see everyone is so interested in having a transcendental election; one that rises above the petty slander-mongering politics of yesterday and focuses on the issues that matter to real Americans.
Look around, people. You're part of the problem.
Posted by: Required | September 1, 2008 2:46 PM | Report abuse
Children out of wedlock?
Posted by: Johna | September 1, 2008 2:46 PM | Report abuse
It must be hard for these Conservative Religious Rights to shove morals down everyone else's throat when their own children have the morals of alley cats.
Posted by: Don Tate in Evans Ga | September 1, 2008 2:46 PM | Report abuse
I guess Palin, socially conservative, "righteous" right evangelist mother, did not educate her daughter well enough to abstain from premarital sex. So much for her mothering abilities. I guess she was too busy being a "politician" to take the time to notice what was happening in her daughter's life. How is she going to be able to pay sufficient attention to America's issues if she cannot even pay enough attention to her daughter's life????
Posted by: abby0802 | September 1, 2008 2:46 PM | Report abuse
A little bit of hypocrisy is unavoidable. We all have high standards that we sometimes fail to live up to. The important thing is that we don't give up, and we try to be the best people we can be. Humans are not perfect and shouldn't be expected to be. If you want to see an example of inexcusable hypocrisy, look at Al Gore.
Posted by: Tom | September 1, 2008 2:46 PM | Report abuse
Lets not be stupid, there is no way he knew. She was only selected for window dressing, and the "Do no harm" theory". He figured to carry the day himself and just didn't want anyone who could have distractions. No way he would have wanted to be wasting time having to deal with this.
------------
I guess if this matter becomes a detrimental factor to Palin's VP chances and McCain knew in advance and still chooses her, it shows what kind of judgement he has or at least what kind of a gambler he is with his decision-making.
Posted by: zaheer | September 1, 2008 2:39 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:46 PM | Report abuse
I think Chris Cillizza is correct. Gov Palin is likely to get alot of sympathy for attacks on her family. It makes me sad for her kids. Unfortunately, the McCain Campaign presented as part of her qualifications that she was a mother of five. She, and McCain, have put her family out there to be judged for political gain. I'm revolted by this. No good can come of it.
Posted by: worried | September 1, 2008 2:46 PM | Report abuse
NO VETTING.
That's the issue here. McCain displayed a DANGEROUS lapse in judgment in choosing Palin - no vetting of her ties to Stevens, her support of "Bridge to Nowhere," his bizarre ignorance of the facts of Troopergate or concern about the major ethical fallout, and now... this pregnancy.
The Palin campaign did not know Bristol was pregnant when asked THIS SATURDAY - 2 DAYS AGO. So how likely is it that the McCain camp knew this for weeks before?
They're trying to cover up a lack of vetting. Which betrays the dangers of a trigger-happy McCain presidency.
Posted by: jo | September 1, 2008 2:45 PM | Report abuse
Obama didn't get this get girl pregnant. So he doesn't need to apologize. So how stupid do these people think the American public is, she had the last baby a month early so they say. But six pounds is a full term baby. OOps!! So what would it be to fudge the time frame now. She wouldn't be the first child to get pregnant right
after having a baby. But to each his or her own, go forth and multiply.
Posted by: juicy | September 1, 2008 2:45 PM | Report abuse
"But today's stunner won't cease speculation about McCain's judgment and fitness to serve as commander in chief. His VP selection process is making Obama's incongruous selection of Joe Biden look like political genius."
I GUESS JOHN McCAIN IS A TRUE MAVERICK RUN AMOK.
THE DEFINTIONS ARE:
To 'run amok', is to behave in a wild or unruly manner.
"Maverick" someone who exhibits great independence in thought and action.
OH MAN. WE ARE TOAST IF HE GETS ELECTED!
Posted by: fghatala | September 1, 2008 2:45 PM | Report abuse
In addition to neglecting her children, Palin lied about this issue. Out of school for five months with Mono?
As Sean Hanntity has told us time and time again, this sort of thing goes to the character of the candidate - and character is important.
Posted by: MorganaLeFay | September 1, 2008 2:45 PM | Report abuse
I am curious does Obama consider Bristol Palin's baby a punishment like he would if it was one of his daughters?
Posted by: Mother30's ish | September 1, 2008 2:45 PM | Report abuse
AS I expected the liberal Democrats are hypocritically looking down their noses at Ms. Palin and her daughter . The Scriptures says "He/she who is without sin cast the first stone.""Judge not that you may not be Judged". I am 80 years old born illegitimately and I challange any one to prove that I am not a law abiding God fearing citizen and patriot.Unfortunately people think too much of themselves to think of others as lower in rank.
Posted by: Joe Dalton | September 1, 2008 2:45 PM | Report abuse
Why did McCain not speak up? He waited to bury the news under the storm stories.
Since McCain clearly knew about it (after the initial vetting, when it SHOULD have been picked up) - why did his campaign hold back the news?
By not announcing it quickly, McCain has let all kinds of rumors fester, and he's done his own VP pick a disservice.
Let me propose Obama's argument - and he should make it quickly:
'We've had 8 years of lies from Bush and Cheney, and McCain is running as an agent of change. By not coming forth with his own statement, and by hiding the facts, McCain comes off as just another person keeping the truth from the public - and we've had ENOUGH of THAT!
What Governor Palin and her family decide is their private business, and their willing inclusion of this out-of-wedlock birth into their family is a great example of how other families should behave in such circumstances. Children should also have birth control education available, to avoid this sort of unplanned event from happening in the first place. Bringing a child into the world should be something intentional, and looked forward to, and not something to be covered up.'
Posted by: Anon in CA | September 1, 2008 2:45 PM | Report abuse
I just love conservative Evangelists. Keep the kid's away from sex education and birth control. No good will come from that. Just keep reading the Bible. It will be all you need.
What? You're pregnant?? How on earth did that happen?
Okay, you will have to get married. Whether you two love each other or not. Forget about any more education or a career. No time for that now.
You're getting a divorce? What? Why? He works at the gas station for his dad and you have that great job working at the convenience store in the evenings. Why ruin all that?
You want us to raise your kid so you can move in with your two girlfriends and party all the time? What? The Bible certainly didn't teach you that.
They have such an idyllic dream of the perfect family. Too bad reality has to rear up its ugly head.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:45 PM | Report abuse
1. McCain cheated on his first wife while married to her. He started dating Cindy while his wife was sitting at home crying.
2. Palin misuses her power to fire the police chief.
3. While Palin was getting pounded by her husband in one room, her teenage unmarried daugher was getting pounded in the next room with some good for nothing guy.
4. Palin's nature conservation statement is "Shoot the moose, make a burger". She is trying to get the votes of all mooseburger lovers in the United States by declaring over and over again how much she likes mooseburger. Wow, Obama should be afraid now since all the mooseburger fans are going to flock to McCain's camp.
5. Palin's message to the teenage girls. Don't worry, just pop out those babies. They are all God given. It doesn't matter whether you are married.
Now here are the messages from the republican convention. If you are a woman follow the example of Palin's daughter. Go and keep on banging until a baby pops out. If you are a married guy, then follow McCain as your example. Just cheat on your wife and go after a rich and loose blonde bimbo.
Palin is the right choice for McCain. But McCain is not the right choice for America. He has no moral bearings himself, and he choses a runningmate only on one criteria, that the person should have female plumbing. At the rate Palin and her teenage duaghter are going McCain will have to fit Air Force 2 with a maternity ward.
Posted by: Mandy | September 1, 2008 2:45 PM | Report abuse
Maybe I'm just crazy, but wasn't the beloved Obama Mama only 17 when she had him? Seems like a HUGE double standard here depending on which side of the aisle you happen to sit. Everyone makes poor decisions at some point during their lives (yes, even you!). The true character of a person is decided with the choices made AFTER the poor decision. The fact that she is still having the child says her mother did raise her with responsibility for her poor decisions.
Posted by: Ginger | September 1, 2008 2:45 PM | Report abuse
Doesn't matter, any of it. The odds of this country electing a black President and first family in tow are virtually nil. This country is simply not ready for it yet.
Posted by: speer | September 1, 2008 2:45 PM | Report abuse
I see the lefties have decided to throw the election in favor of touting an ugly, tasteless, mean-spirited creepiness that can only repel ordinary humans of good will.
Enjoy your disgusting echo chamber, fools. You deserve the shellacking you're going to get.
Your Democrat-shill host from the WaPo is trying to warn you not to do this. But you can't resist demonstrating what hate-filled small minds you have. That's because you actually have hate-filled small minds. From someone who wants to beat your politics... thanks.
Posted by: Bob H | September 1, 2008 2:45 PM | Report abuse
The major difference here is that the Palin's are birthing the baby, vice viewing it as a punishment. Obama and his windbag sidekick are such tools to deny that his campaign had anything to do with this ... OF COURSE they have investigators lurking in the dark corners where all liberal media and politicos reside, diggin up whatever they can to add to the "gotcha" list. They and the Soros-led hate-mongers are just getting started ... hope the other side wages an equally "thorough" campaign to bring to light the real background other than the intuitively obvious niceties such as Obama's complete lack of any executive experience and leadership ...
Posted by: LT369 | September 1, 2008 2:45 PM | Report abuse
What a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to conceive.
Posted by: Dromo | September 1, 2008 2:45 PM | Report abuse
Well, HELLO, what the hell else are you going to do up there, it's frickin' Alaska, for God's sake. Is Sarah Palin going to shoot a walrus for the shotgun wedding dinner?
Posted by: Dan Rains | September 1, 2008 2:44 PM | Report abuse
Glorifying teenage pregency, sex before marriage, mother and daughter reproducing simulteneously - what kind of family values are these? Other than animalistic reproduction what is pro-family in it? This is sheer hypocracy on the part of those who claim family and moral values. This is extremely disgusting as it is the lowest level of human existence - below animals - even they follow laws of nature and don't reproduce rampently and glorify it as "high moral and family values".
Yeah! What a role model!! Clinton's behavior was unexcusable, so said the conservatives, because he is the head of the nation and hence a role model. Now what a role model the conservatives have!!
Well done!! Keep it up!!!
Posted by: umok | September 1, 2008 2:44 PM | Report abuse
What does a 17 year old know about love? Adults know that sex and pregnancy do not equal love. Palin announced her daughter will marry the father. Is this marriage for love or politics? Personally, it was not something that I wanted to hear. Maybe she should leave the decision up to her daughter and the young father of the child. Bristol should give this important decision of marriage some serious consideration before she jumps into something else spontaneously. It got her in a world of trouble the first time. She needs a caring and loving mother now, not a politician.
Palin, I’m not impressed with your track record or “experience” with lying and cover ups. Your daughter has not even finished high school and does not have a job! She should have not gotten herself pregnant and certainly not marry. Who is flipping the bill for the prenatal care? Wouldn’t birth control have been a cheaper option and less headache for all parties involved, including taxpayers?
BRISTOL, DO NOT GET MARRIED!!!! Get to know someone extremely well before you take the plunge. Make sure the guy has an education, job, income, etc., in other words, a future! You do not need a deadbeat husband or father. It’s called baggage, girl friend! Most importantly, you have to know yourself well before you can join with somebody else in marriage. You will be a totally different person at 21, 25, 30, and 40 years old. It’s a recipe for divorce if you marry too young and naive.
Posted by: marriage for love or politics? | September 1, 2008 2:44 PM | Report abuse
"It should not fall to her husband alone, and it's a not a job for hired help."
Of course it's a job for hired help. Today's working moms hire nannies, or they place their children in day care. Nothing wrong with that at all.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:44 PM | Report abuse
It's certainly good that Ms. Palin's unmarried daughter's boyfriend is going to do the right thing, and marry his pregnant girlfriend. I do have to wonder how long a marrigage will last under the circumstances of two teenagers marrying each other even if their families are situated so that they can lend them more support than others who are not so financially well off. And I also have to wonder if the religious rights' refusal to offer meaningful sex education contributed to the situation.
Posted by: Steven Danis | September 1, 2008 2:44 PM | Report abuse
Not an issue. Poor kids. Leave them alone.
Remember that Senator Obama has been very open about the fact that he was born six months after his parents got married.
He has also talked a great deal about teen age pregnancies and the importance of the father not abandoning the situation and staying involved. In this case it certainly sounds like the young father is not running away. (Not that that running away would be a very practical option if you got the daughter of a sitting governor pregnant -- and particularly a governor who seems pretty comfortable bringing the state police into her family disputes.)
Let's forget about it.
Posted by: Fairfax Voter | September 1, 2008 2:44 PM | Report abuse
Ann, before you write "can you spell Mediciad", learn how to spell...Medicaid.
Posted by: Mike | September 1, 2008 2:44 PM | Report abuse
Sarah Palin said her purpose in releasing this information about her daughter was to rebut rumors that Palin herself was never preganant with a fifth child, but has assumed the role of mother to her grandchild. Um, Sarah, you could have just released your own medical records and let your daughter have her privacy.
Just a thought.
Posted by: AgathaX | September 1, 2008 2:44 PM | Report abuse
In a country of Judge Judy, Oprah, Jerry Springer, and Days of Our Lives we are used to this sort of thing. It's like a reformer who is being investigated for influencing personnel decisions, drummed up funds for a
senator under indictment, did and didn't support the bridge to nowhere but got the money anyway, the person accused and fined for ethics violations still is in her cabinet, and hired a consultant to get earmarked funds from Washington. I may be dreaming but apperenly I am not the only one.
Posted by: jpdmc | September 1, 2008 2:44 PM | Report abuse
To add proof of Palin's selfishness and her "me first" attitude is the fact that she chose to board a plane for an 8 hour flight, with prematurely ruptured membranes in her fifth pregnancy.
That showed little regard for the safety of the infant, not to mention the welfare of other passengers, if she had gone into full-blown labor and delivered while in-flight, an extremely plausible scenario.
Posted by: Dixie | September 1, 2008 2:44 PM | Report abuse
If her mom's "pro-life" did Bristol even have a choice?
Posted by: Confused Person | September 1, 2008 2:44 PM | Report abuse
1- How do we know that the daughter is now pregnant?
2- The 5-month pregnancy is a well chosen number where no one can claim the first birth is the daughter’s, in the mean time no one can know the truth until after the election date. They put the date after November election, but not too far after so people will think it is a second child of the daughter.
3- McCain seems to have the eye for younger good looking women.
4- Is it true that McCain was greeted by this woman 20 years ago in Alaska?
5- Most importantly, it is the hypocrisy of those people that reminds me that I have been sick and tired of them.
Posted by: OMZ | September 1, 2008 2:43 PM | Report abuse
palin will be too distracted with her own infant and pregnant teenager to be our vice president. and if she isn't, her values are not what she says.
at some point, republicans need to say, "mccain, couldn't you have done better than this?"
Posted by: pdxmommy | September 1, 2008 2:43 PM | Report abuse
perhaps sarah palin IS the bridge to nowhere.
Posted by: tmast | September 1, 2008 2:43 PM | Report abuse
Palin describes herself as a Pentecostal. Pentecostals believe in "Speaking in Tongues." Hmmmm.
Here is a quote from another blog, submitted three years ago by an ex-Pentecostal woman.
"I was born and raised in a Pentecostal church organization that was a cult. Some of the reasons I call it a cult are:
a) The preachers preached that this organization had the "whole truth" while all other churches lacked the "whole truth" and were a "lesser Gospel."
b) They enforced extra-biblical rules for members, and if we did not follow them, we could not be active members.
c) The leaders were god-like in their own minds. They were so protected that when they spoke obvious falacies in the pulpit and were corrected in private, the congregation never heard the corrections, leaving some thinking that the falacies were true.
d) Two pastors abused me (one married pastor by catching me, when I was 17, in a dark hall and kissing me and one by deliberately touching my breasts when I was a grown widowed woman), but they were so protected that I dared not tell until after I left, because I knew what would happen: I would be called a liar while the preachers were coddled. Another pastor asked me an inappropriate question about how I managed sexually as a suddenly-single woman.
e) Both leaders and members warned me that if I ever left, I would go to hell taking my children with me, I would become sick, I would suffer financial loss, and would end up divorced. I was scared to leave, as are many members who continue there while wanting to go.
For the last 13+ years there, I wanted out desparately but did not have the nerve to leave. I was finally kicked out when I told the pastor I would not take my wedding band off anymore when I entered his church. (Oh! Let me add that he also didn't like my watch, which was on a chain because of my alergy to metals that broke my wrists out.) He did me a HUGE favor. Now, my husband and children are all also out.
I recently returned for a family funeral, and I mentioned to my daughter-in-law that the ladies there kept giving me dirty looks, so I did not stay for the dinner they provided after the funeral. She started laughing, and I was puzzled. She said, "That's the way they always look! They weren't giving you dirty looks -- they always look like that!" Oddly, I had forgotten. They seem very unhappy -- angry, really!"
Posted by: Jersey John | September 1, 2008 2:43 PM | Report abuse
I doubt this will hurt Palin among social conservatives but she will lose some credibility among the general public.
It's like the Catholic church. The Catholic church goes around telling everyone how to manage their sex life - but then it turns out that Catholic priests are diddling the alter boys. The general public thinks, "Hmmm, maybe some of the Catholic Church's policies (e.g. requiring celibacy) are making the alter boy diddling much more likely" Maybe the Catholic Church's advice on sex isn't really all that great.
Now, with Palin, you've got two very questionable pregnancies. First, Palin herself: she's 44 years old (high probability of birth defects), she's already got 4 kids (does she really need another?), she's governor of Alaska (not a lot of time to be a mother) - what was she thinking getting herself pregnant? Next, you've got the daughter: 17 is just not the right time to get pregnant.
I don't fault them for not having abortions - but what were they thinking getting pregnant in the first place? It sure makes it look like Palin's life philosophy, whatever it is, leaves a lot to be desired. I don't feel sorry for them but I feel very sorry for their babies: these babies are not going to be well cared for.
Posted by: John | September 1, 2008 2:43 PM | Report abuse
Another success for 'Abstinence Only' sex education.
Posted by: john91011 | September 1, 2008 2:43 PM | Report abuse
You forgot that she was FOR the "bridge to nowhere" before she was AGAINST it, when she figured out being against it would help her get to Juneau
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:43 PM | Report abuse
"This happens to the best of families." Hello? Well get ready then, because the "best of families" is about to tell you what you should do with yours! Give me a break... funny we don't remember impeaching a president for immorality but this is a "blessing"? How about both D's and R's stay out of my house, family, kids and any other personal right I have left and balance the budget, fix the roads and protect the country. That's all we need here... not the ideal movie star running for office... just a bean counter - thanks!
Posted by: Scott | September 1, 2008 2:43 PM | Report abuse
So John McCain is now asking us to accept as his running mate -- the person who will (literally) be a heartbeat away from the Oval Office -- somebody who can't even maintain control of (or promote her strong "conservative" morals and values within) a family of 7. Granted, you don't necessarily have to be a great mother to be a great politician, but it seems like she needs to get her own house in order before she tries to get our country in order.
Posted by: do as we say, not as we do... | September 1, 2008 2:43 PM | Report abuse
This poor girl will HAVE to marry the baby's father or some guy who says he is the father.....by election time this girl will be MARRIED and she will not have a voice in the matter, nor will her parents have a voice in the matter...she will be MARRIED. What if she does not want to get married now? It will not matter--she will be MARRIED! Bring out the shotguns.......
Posted by: Valdar | September 1, 2008 2:43 PM | Report abuse
"She accepted the VP nomination knowing that her daughter would be exposed to national ridicule. Quite the mom."
Why should her daughter be exposed to national ridicule? Do YOU go around ridiculing teenage mothers? Or is it just the Obama campaign that does it?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:43 PM | Report abuse
How is Palin, as VP, going to find the time to raise a child who needs 24-hour care and to take care of a pregnant daughter? It should not fall to her husband alone, and it's a not a job for hired help. I would think that family values would demand a mother take care of her family before running (literally) all over the world for her career.
Posted by: Jimbo | September 1, 2008 2:42 PM | Report abuse
Wether or not you believe that Trig is the child of Palins daughter Bristol, we must all admit that there is something very fishy about the situation. Why is it that Palin gained so much weight during her first pregnancy and none during her "supposed" fifth while her daughter showed signs of either having been (or still being) pregnant? Bristol may well be pregnant with her second child. What many keep forgetting is that although she is "about five months pregnant" we do not really know how far along she is in her pregnancy. Moreover a child with down syndrome takes longer to develop than a normal baby. So if Trig looks five months then he could be older than that. Hopefully the National Enquirer, which carried all the breaking news on the Edwards Scandal, will look into this story.
Posted by: Rebekah | September 1, 2008 2:42 PM | Report abuse
McCain would have been good in the role of the Scarecrow in "The Wizard of Oz". . . ."Oh, if I only had a brain!"
Posted by: Reality Bites | September 1, 2008 2:42 PM | Report abuse
Well what do ya know!!! This is what happens when you become desperate, impulsive and careless with key, important decisions that could effect an entire nation!!!!
Her acceptance to run as VP says alot about her lack of judgment as well. What was she thinking? Are we to believe that she will be intends to help tackle major national problems and foreign policy all with a baby on the hip and teen pregnant daughter, not to mention
two other kids who will need her full, undevided attention!!!!
Clever, McLame.... Clever!
Like many have stated. This woman with her many distractions scares me to death to be a heartbeat away from the presidency!!! This is a mess!!!
I certainly hope Bristol wasn't forced into marriage!!! Let's be realistic.. at 17 do you really know that you want to be hitched to some guy who knocked you up for the rest of your miserable lives?!!
I give the marriage two years at best! How old is the baby daddy anyway! I read that Britol was out of school for 5 months for mono (the kissing disease).. Seems like Ms. Bristol is hot in the pants.
The republican party is going to be the laughing stock of the nation!!! Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha!!
It doesn't get any better than this!!
Posted by: JWilkes | September 1, 2008 2:42 PM | Report abuse
So Sarah Palin's husband is a drunk driver. Well, that certainly fits with McCain too. Cindy McCain's little beer distribution company is well known as an opponent to strengthening laws against drunk driving; for example, her company has rejected any lowering if the blood alcohol level for driving drunk.
Posted by: jreed11665 | September 1, 2008 2:42 PM | Report abuse
Effect of news on a campaign is not a legitimate journalistic concern.
Journalists should be reporting the news here: two unwed pregnancies involving Palin's child -- the first covered up by a clumsy hoax by Palin followed by yet a second. Those are objective facts that should be reported; let others decide what to make of them. Journalists should not be suppressing stories, they should report them. Palin is Thomas Eagleton revisited with a skirt. Find a new veep.
___________________
"Any sense that Democrats are pushing this idea will almost certainly turn both Sarah and Bristol Palin into sympathetic figures -- and that spells trouble for her detractors."
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:42 PM | Report abuse
I am so sad to think that people would imply that a family has no values because the teenage girl is pregnant. This is a family that has a child that made a bad choice and is now facing up to it. That should be off limits to the press for Democrats or Republicans. We can preach and teach all we want but when it comes down to it kids make their own choices.
It is no way implies that Gov. Palin is a hypocrite. She's out there doing the best she can just like the rest of us.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:42 PM | Report abuse
The best way to save the Republican Party now is to destroy it. In the marketplace of ideas, social conservatism is a viral infection contaminating the GOP. It represents an evolutionary dead-end whose logical conclusion is fascism if not outright totalitarianism. Is it not obvious that the imposition of the evangelical ideology--any fundamentalist ideology for that matter--lies in direct opposition to a free people in a democratic land? Our Constitution, specifically the separation of church and state, no longer serves as a bulwark against the morality police, who seek to impose faith-based notions such as creationism upon those of us with rational minds. Social conservatives aim to constrain freedom of thought, freedom of choice, freedom to pursue happiness. These freedoms live at the heart of an entrepreneurial and economically strong America. No doubt, the diktat the social conservative movement wishes to impose upon ALL us Americans is antithetical to a free market system, and therefore exists as hypocrisy within the Republican platform. Privatize profits, socialize losses, and make religion the opiate of the masses. Indeed, this has been a dark eight years of Orwellian doubletalk. Enough! I’m a Reagan Republican and I’m voting for Libertarian Bob Barr.
Posted by: Mack | September 1, 2008 2:42 PM | Report abuse
"If it were a 17 yr old Obama daughter pregnancy, hippocrite conservatives would be calling the girl and her family godless sinners."
If it were Obama's daughter, we'd never had known about it, because his people would have spirited her off to an abortion clinic, with NDA signed all around.
Posted by: Douglas | September 1, 2008 2:42 PM | Report abuse
BREAKING NEWS
AUDIO TAPE OF PALIN CHIEF OF STAFF SURFACES!!
http://www.gov.state.ak.us/audio/FrankBaileyCDaudio.mp3
(good stuff half way thru tape)
The tape, between her chief of staff, and public safety director PROVES Palin QUILTY of trying to get her ex-brother-in-law, (a state trooper) FIRED because he divorced her sister.
In the tape, Palin chief of state quotes PALIN as asking WHY the trooper has not been fired.
PALIN, currently under investigation by bipartisan group of Alaska legislators, faces IMPEACHMENT, if found guilty of attempting to get trooper fired.
PAILIN TO BE DEPOSED, UNDER OATH, NEXT WEEK.
Posted by: Bob | September 1, 2008 2:42 PM | Report abuse
To Theresa:
Um, correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't it a prominent Dem (Fowler, to be exact) who said that "God is on our side" when discussing the timing of Hurricane Gustav and the Rep Convention? That is absolutely shameful and completely disrespectful of all those people living in the storm's path.
And then Fowler had the nerve to issue and "un-apology" while calling the person who posted the recording on YouTube a "Nutcase".
It just goes to show that Dems always accuse Reps of things that they themselves have already done ten-fold. Maybe it's time to take a good hard look at your own party Theresa.
PS I'm an Independant - leaning Libertarian. Not a Republican, so don't think this is a party line I'm spouting here.
Posted by: Tracy | September 1, 2008 2:42 PM | Report abuse
If it turns out that Trig is actually Bristol's child, then Sarah Palin will have lied to the country not once, but twice in her very first national appearance. (She also claimed to have been against the "Bridge to Nowhere", when in fact she only opposed it when federal funding to complete it was denied.) I don't care about the pregnancy, but the dishonesty should be confronted.
Posted by: mhelms | September 1, 2008 2:41 PM | Report abuse
So much for abstinence only education.
She can't even control her child and she's are heartbeat away from becoming President.
What a freaking joke.
Posted by: David | September 1, 2008 2:41 PM | Report abuse
Not for long
--------
@raul:"...Growing up is a learning experience, and Bristol has a tough road ahead of her. She should be left alone."
Don't worry, she will be alone -- her mother will be on the campaign trail.
Posted by: cherie | September 1, 2008 2:38 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:41 PM | Report abuse
Interesting that they keep referring to her as a 17 year old. My guess is that 5 months ago she was still 16 years old which makes a world of difference in most state courts. Sex between an 18 year old and a 16 year old girl has been prosecuted and sent many underaged boys to prison and featured on 60 Minutes. Any word on their real ages at the time?
Posted by: Leichtman | September 1, 2008 2:41 PM | Report abuse
We Democrats should watch our language and our manners.
Yes, the issue is relevant to the campaign given McCain's choice of a little known and inexperienced candidate on the national scene. He touted her for her model family, and they are both running on conservative family values. Since we know little about Palin, the little we do know takes on more relevance.
We can and should challenge McCain and Palin's judgment and effectiveness in light of this inconsistency.
Remember, though, we're also talking about a 17 year old girl who now has to deal with an already troubling situation in the glare of the media. I'm disappointed that
McCain and Palin would put a kid in this position. Still, I hope Palin and McCain critics will take the high road that Obama has modeled.
Posted by: Erica C | September 1, 2008 2:41 PM | Report abuse
I heard that McCain was planning tap Anna Nichole Smith for Federal Reserve Chairman, and that he was all broken up when someone reminded him that she was dead.
Posted by: MorganaLeFay | September 1, 2008 2:41 PM | Report abuse
At least there are more coherent comments here than typical blogs. In one person's humble opinion, many of the commentators here apparently are Democratic or lean such. I am an independent that admittedly finds self voting GOP almost as reaction to excessive liberalism (& ignored corruption ala Chicago politics, Sen Dodd friend of Angelo loans, Murtha, Chappaquidick, etc) Dems so often find themselves beholden to. What I think media, pundits & typical Dem leftish loyalists miss is that McCain is an independent that just happens to align more GOP (yes that is the party label-fair game) than Dem - but how many centrist Dems seem to get to the national level these days? Gore and he was more left of center albeit appealingly from Tenn. Palin is really an independent as well who happens to have started out as GOP in Alaska but made more enemies in GOP there than among Dems. But of course Dems there will provide dirt/negatives now that Palin has gone national to help party. To be expected. But point that all the hot air misses. Life is messy. Moveon.org 'supposedly' was formed to defend Bill Clinton from impeachment for his mistakes. Again, if that had been a Republican, without doubt the media would have forced such prez to resign. Even all you died in the wool Dems have to admit to that double standard, but Clinton for better or worse with Hillary's motivations hung in there. But that was messy no doubt. What strikes me is that the Palin's are authentically 'real people' where she just happened to get into politics not as a primary avocation but secondary interest. Her success & capability (maybe right place; right time as Alaskan political order self-destructed) helped propel her to state level. Life is messy; kids are kids and Alaska is Alaska (meaning it is a harsh unforgiving natural environment - it really is a much harder place to live than the other 49 states & life experiences from Alaska have a lot more credibility in my mind than insider grants/jobs at UChicago or WashDC Delaware/MBNA have). Anyone of us (I have oldest 14 year old boy) could be in Palin's position. All the 'good parents' coming out here better be careful - look in the mirror before invoking politics into this - and wish them luck. Secondly, the main point, Palin is authentically a real person versus a political operative. Am sure by the Fall she will change, but up to this point Palin is the closest thing I have ever seen of a Mr Smith Goes to Washington (yeah, even Jimmy Stewart's movie family kids could have had a teen pregnancy). No abortions here just dealing with life's curve balls. Palin chose not to abort her baby - give her credit instead of vilifying her. And husband & her have done pretty decent job as real people so far with family in environment (again Alaska - it is not Chicago, or NYC or WashDC or Calif for that matter). Presume family discussed & support her candidacy - so who are any of you or us to question this. Again, be careful, life could be messy too for all the 2nd guessers here. In many ways this underscores her authenticity - she is a real person in a leadership position versus 95% of the phonies in politics. The left & Planned Parenthood crowd will crow that Palin makes their case. Go ahead, make the argument ... but I dare any of you to put your 'principled' selves into the position of the Palin family. Be careful as life offers up so many surprsing turns you may be faced with your own ridicule on a more personal level. Last, go ahead and defend/justify some of the vicious rumor mongering by Alan Clomes of Fox and DailyKos - make you feel better! Remember, John Edwards got a free pass for how long but attempts to destroy an authentic real person who happens to be GOP occurs in 72 hours. What is wrong with this picture? I know, more moral hypocrisy being spewed by facist hate-mongering Republicans. Let'em drown in their moral vacuums versus your high principles ..... keep it up.
Posted by: Reaction to Closed Minds | September 1, 2008 2:41 PM | Report abuse
This truly is the ultimate in irony.
To all the Republicans whining about how "ugly" and mean spirited people are being....I say, SHUT THE F UP!!
Can you imagine the damage Carl Rove would inflict if this was Obama's daughter??
Sarah Palin is about to find out, that when you stand on a national stage and preach ABSTINENCE to Americas daughters, then tell them that ....Oh yeah, by the way, we are going to BAN CONTRACEPTION, so that you cannot protect yourselves, then YES....
The women of America are going to rise up and squash you like the pandering cockroach that you are.
Dont ever think you can pull the rug out on what the women of this country have worked so hard to achieve.
YOU DO NOT SPEAK FOR THE WOMEN OF THIS COUNTRY--you are a World-Class idiot, and McCain should be ashamed!!!
Posted by: misssymoto | September 1, 2008 2:41 PM | Report abuse
Why the heck people have to see things always through a partisan lens? If Palin's daughter is pregnant at 17, it's definitely a sign of bad parenting. How can anyone disagree with that? In fact, this new revelation looks like another lie to cover the earlier lie. After all, how can we be sure that she is speaking truth about her daughter this time around?
Posted by: Ajay | September 1, 2008 2:41 PM | Report abuse
It's funny how everything changes on the Right when a story hits home, and is no longer "academic" or "theoretical." Ask Mort Kondracke how his views on stem cell research changed after his wife Millie was diagnosed with Alzheimer's. Ask the Right why Rush Limbaugh and his Excess In Barbiturates addiction received a total pass (legally AND morally); meanwhile so called Compassionate Conservatives have for years raged against addicts and against providing the same sort of medical treatment Rush received. (Just throw the junkies in jail...)
And there's plenty more; high profile anti homosexual Republicans and Christian leaders who happen to be, well, homosexual!
Which takes us to a VERY strange pick, and a very strange family - Sarah Palin and the Palin 5. (How is it that no one has commented on the more than rather strange names the Palin children have?) McCain has shown how calculating he has become, and in order to win how he has no problem becoming the very thing he swore to oppose.
I'm sure most conservatives would agree that in any other case this sort of white trash behavior would be indicative of some serious problems in the home. (Well, it is.)
Yet, once again, more Badly Behaving Republicans get a free pass. And, unfortunately, so does McCain for his appalling choice, his appalling judgment, and his appalling willingness to prostitute himself in order to gain that which he has coveted for so long.
Posted by: TheEndsDontJustifyTheMeans | September 1, 2008 2:41 PM | Report abuse
LOL Ken O
I think you're all missing the point here, it's ridiculous to argue over this when our country is going to shambles. It's like people arguing over their cabin assignments in a sinking ship. McCain is old and unhealthy, there's a high likely-hood that this woman will become President if McCain is elected.
Can you honestly be comfortable allowing yourselves to be governed by a person who can't even pronounce the names of some foreign countries properly? Someone who, like you've all mentioned above, has a lot more serious and distracting issues to deal with than governance? Someone extremely (!!!!) inexperienced? Can you imagine hockey grandma negotiating with foreign statesmen...we're going to wish we had Bush back.
I like Palin as a person, she seems very real and very decent. But so does my neighbor, Joe. Does this mean he should be president? I think he also runs a little league!
Wake up, people! Are you all deranged?
Posted by: DjJazzyJeff | September 1, 2008 2:41 PM | Report abuse
Interesting that they keep referring to her as a 17 year old. My guess is that 5 months ago she was still 16 years old which makes a world of difference in most state courts. Sex between an 18 year old and a 16 year old grl has been prosecuted and sent many underaged boys to prison and featured on 60 Minutes. Any word on their real ages at the time?
Posted by: Lechtan | September 1, 2008 2:40 PM | Report abuse
Hey America, we know John McCain has EXPERIENCE, Experience with Beauty Queens and runner ups with POOR Family Values, seem familiar with Janna Bush? MORE OF THE SAME from John McCain!
Posted by: Jerry, TEXAS | September 1, 2008 2:40 PM | Report abuse
So, all you Obama supporters drooling over this, are you saying that all women with teenage daughters should drop their careers and stay at home to spend more time with their children?
You're not very progressive now are you?
Be very careful here.
Posted by: WomenStayAtHomeThen | September 1, 2008 2:40 PM | Report abuse
Palin whole stand is family values and abstinence only education. It didn't work for her family - whatever, I'm not judging that. What is HYPOCRITICAL about this is the Palin wants to tell me how to raise my kid, to teach them abstinence only (instead of,uh, birth control -- not abortion -- birth control).
This is a mother who CHOSE to run for VP, KNOWING her kid was pregnant. Don't bash the so-called "liberal" media for this - Palin made her own announcement.
You know if Chelsea Clinton or the Obama girls (5 years from now) were pregnant, Fox news and Ann Coulter would be all over it -- DON'T LIE and say, oh no, Fox news and Coulter would politely look the other way. They would eat it up like kids in a candy store.
Posted by: Brigid1 | September 1, 2008 2:40 PM | Report abuse
Nice, McCain. What kind of soldier uses a pregnant 17-year-old girl as a political shield? You knew what this was going to do, how it would divert attention away from your policies. You are throwing her under the bus.
Posted by: Lucas | September 1, 2008 2:40 PM | Report abuse
Kind of stupid how few people actually look up the facts vs. how many believe in the rumors.
I found some interesting abortion statistics on the Center for Disease Control website. Strange how they consider it a disease.
Anyway, if you check the numbers, it's actually the conservative red state white middle class that has the highest per capita abortion rate. Most inner-city poor minorities keep their kids, planned or not.
Don't blame me, I'm just the messenger.
Posted by: Tim | September 1, 2008 2:40 PM | Report abuse
I didn't believe it at first... but I've done just a bit of digging.
Gov. Palin did not announce "her" pregnancy until a month before the
baby was born. (She'd have been seven months pregnant when she
announced this, and apparently hiding it VERY well.)
Gov. Palin was in Texas when "her" water broke, a month early. While
experiencing a high-risk pregnancy (her own age, carrying a Down
Syndrome baby, and having signs of impending delivery a month early),
she DECIDED TO FLY TO ALASKA to have "her" baby in a town of 4,500
people.
Apparently, the flight crew didn't notice that a woman about to
deliver was boarding their plane.
Palin did not take maternity leave. Which is a bit odd on its face, but even more odd considering the challenges of learning how to deal with a premature infant who is born with Down Syndrome.
Of course, this evidence is circumstantial. I'd like to see the birth
certificate. And if it's shown that she IS the mother, I'd like to see
a genetic test (since she's Governor of the state in which "she" gave
birth).
Posted by: Scott S | September 1, 2008 2:40 PM | Report abuse
But... the girl had abstinence-only education.
How did this happen???/
Posted by: Ed | September 1, 2008 2:40 PM | Report abuse
Shotgun wedding and the State Troopers are holding the barrel. Just as she did to try and get her ex-brother-in-law fired.
OMG, can you imagine the extortion surrounding the baby's daddy's family? Corrupt woman in power, stand back.. She is a perfect fit to fill Cheeney's shoes
Posted by: STATE TROOPER | September 1, 2008 2:40 PM | Report abuse
Since when is teenage pregnancy admirable? If a Democratic candidadte's kids got knocked up this would be spun in a totally negative light. Palin should have decided to spend more time rearing her special needs child and teenage daughter.
right to lifers take note- you must raise the children you decide to have!
This is an outrage.
Posted by: HER | September 1, 2008 2:39 PM | Report abuse
I don't think even the most liberal of Dems (like myself) have any Schadenfreude over this family's issues--it's really aimed at Republican hypocrisy. I feel for the mother of 5 children who now has a special-needs baby; I feel for the teenager who was taught "abstinence only" (and certainly not about sexuality and birth control, and how to be responsible if she couldn't be abstinent), and how now "has" to have the child, keep it, and get married. We know all too well how *that* marriage will work out. THE THING IS, those on the Right, and especially the Evangelicals, are so high and mighty about the "immoral" Liberals. Look folks, we're all the same--the Pallins, the Left, and the Right. We're just human. But honestly, Liberals are MUCH better at accepting that we are all human (though we hate the hypocrisy of the Right, as evidenced in this story). The so-called Conservatives are the ones who do nothing but judge (unless it's about one of their own, apparently). Good luck to the Pallins. But I can't imagine that they'd want to be or should be part of the Exectutive branch of the US government. Surely, there was *someone* else better qualified...
Posted by: Scott | September 1, 2008 2:39 PM | Report abuse
MorganleFey:
Have you forgotten about the Democrats and all their adulterous affairs? Kennedy, Edwards, Clinton, etc. They are hardly upstanding men with values. It seems more than 3/4 of the politicians in our country past and present have power trips and lack moral values.
Posted by: Megan | September 1, 2008 2:39 PM | Report abuse
Did anyone think it's odd that Bristol was holding Sarah Palin's "youngest son"/her young brother in a great photo-opp like her mommy's VP pick announcement? Wouldn't you expect Daddy (Todd) to be holding Todd? Especially if Bristol was pregnant?
Posted by: elizabeth | September 1, 2008 2:39 PM | Report abuse
h y p o c r i t e s!
You can teach CREATIONISM IN SCHOOL, but NO SEX EDUCATION!
Who's the mommies baby of Trig anyway? America wants to know. Bristol could have gotten pregnant right after Trig was born. Abstinence does not work! They don't believe in birth control, so there you have it!
WONDER WHO THE OLD FART WILL PICK FOR HIS RUNNING MATE NOW. WAIT UNTIL TROOPERGATE COMES OUT. NOW SHE RAN TED STEVENS (indicted) 527 FOR THE BRIDGE TO NOWHERE, THAT SHE SUPPORTED WHOLE HEARTEDLY!
Like I said, wow, this lady is a hypocrite, who has no idea what goes on in the lower 48!
Posted by: Andrea D | September 1, 2008 2:39 PM | Report abuse
The mother sarah so intent in hiding her daughter's condition, TAKES HER OUT OF SCHOOL AND LIES ABOUT THE REASONS (HELLO, ANYONE CARE?) oh, I should say I'M A CHRISTIAN REPUB MOTHER for holy cow - LIEING is LIEING period. LIes about it, to cover up HER (Sarah's shame ) then when she's asked to take the VP slot, LOOK AT ALL THE PHOTOS with Bristol trying to cover it up - HOW SAD FOR BRISTOL. Not only does your entire town now know, when you were at home you were not home SICK you were Pregnant and THAT IS OK It is ! but MOM taking you on the campaign trail with a blanket over your tummy and now for the world to know, Bristol is the one neglected here and being asked to care for the baby. Who do you think was at home caring for the baby Trig all this time ? BRISTOL ... that's why she was at home to care for Sarah's baby... give' me a break. THAT LEADERSHIP FOLKS...
Posted by: all so sad | September 1, 2008 2:39 PM | Report abuse
I travel overseas quite often especially in Asia. What's amazing is that Asian women supports their women to be their leader. Here in the US it's the opposite. I was in a large group this labor day weekend and what was shocking to me was that the majority of the women there was saying that a woman is not ready to lead the country. Most men support men, most blacks support blacks the exception I guess are women. I still remember some of my women friends glee when Martha Stewart fell from grace. I knew a tough successful broker a women and all the women in the office called her the "B" word. all us guys admired her and looked up to her. Is this an American women thing?
Posted by: Jorson | September 1, 2008 2:39 PM | Report abuse
"but look on the bright side. we can now put Bristol (who names their kid after a man's shaving cream, anyway?)"
... Actually, Bristol (Bay) is a place in Alaska, as is "Willow". And "Piper" pays homage to the most beloved bush plane used in Alaska, the Piper Cub. I like the names she's given her children. I even like the one she gave to her grandson, Trig!
Posted by: indy-pendent | September 1, 2008 2:39 PM | Report abuse
I guess if this matter becomes a detrimental factor to Palin's VP chances and McCain knew in advance and still chooses her, it shows what kind of judgement he has or at least what kind of a gambler he is with his decision-making.
Posted by: zaheer | September 1, 2008 2:39 PM | Report abuse
Could you imagine the outrage if one of Obama's kids was a few years older and pregnant?
Posted by: Erik in Maine | September 1, 2008 1:28 PM
_____________________________________
No I can't ....if it were Obama's daughter he would help kill his grandchild.
Posted by: skeet | September 1, 2008 2:39 PM | Report abuse
Ahem, that should read "shocked reaction in Anchorage and Fairbanks" newspapers.
So many scandals, so many signs that she is not only inexperienced but has a default response to lie and cover up, you start to get the stories confused after a while. Perhaps that is the McCain team's plan?
Posted by: John M. | September 1, 2008 2:39 PM | Report abuse
It's easy to judge when it is not you. I guess that none of us have never made mistakes. And there are a lot of you who made these comments that had lot of unmarried sex when you were teens and just got lucky and did not get pregnant. Some of us are good parents and their kid screwed up. We do not know the Palin family and what goes on in their house hold. Don't forget there is also a young man that was also involved in this and is just as much to blame.
You people who are so quick to judge should get a life and start looking at dealing with the problems in your own homes and stop worrying about everyone else's just to keep from focusing on you and your own.
Besides, what does what goes on in the privacy of one's own home have to do with the proper running of this country?
How many of you still supported Bill Clinton when it was revealed what a two-timing womanizer he is? Hmmm....
Posted by: Eddie | September 1, 2008 2:38 PM | Report abuse
Obama who? Why isn't he in the news any more? Didn't he have something to say about his daughters getting pregnant?
Posted by: Fred | September 1, 2008 2:38 PM | Report abuse
Bristol should be left alone on this one. Her pregnancy is her business.
However, Palin is a supporter of abstinence only sex education, which makes this kind of ironic.
Plus, Bristol made the decision to keep her baby, a decision she wouldn't have if Palin and McCain got their wish and Roe/Wade was overturned.
If McCain wins then when entering the White House in January Palin will have a 17 year old daughter with a new born baby and a little boy with downs syndrome who is still under the age of 1. If she can cope I'll take her word for it, but it is going to be one busy household (for a 'pro-family' candidate).
Posted by: Chris | September 1, 2008 2:38 PM | Report abuse
Obviously the word "NO" doesn't exist in the Palin Family Dictionary ...
Posted by: jameo | September 1, 2008 2:38 PM | Report abuse
I think it's good Sarah's daughter is keeping the baby and getting married and I'm a Democrat. I disagree with Sarah Palin that in cases of rape or incest a woman shouldn't have a abortion.. I also think it's funny that with Bristol's Christian upbringing that she is a teenager, pregnant and unmarried. I didn't grow up in a conservative home, didn't go to church every Sunday and according to Christians I'm going to Hell but I have morals and got pregnant after I got married.
Posted by: Sam | September 1, 2008 2:38 PM | Report abuse
Can all that bullsh&t. You want to get mad at someone get mad at your party and John Mccain for doing this to you. Instead of wasting your time on this blog you should be organizing a petition to send to the GOP to get rid of her before it is too late. This is just the beginning. Do you know anyone from Alaska or who grew up there. Trust me, these people have a past the tabloids will find it. Let me tell you, if my guess is right, wait till you see the father of this baby. They are probably trying to clean him up now. Your best hope is he is not a crack head.
----------
The CRUELTY OF THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS is out in force this week - the SEXISM OF THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS - AND NOW THEIR ATTITUDE ABOUT A TEENAGE PREGNANCY.
I GUESS ALL THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS WOULD PREFER TO KILL THE BABY.
BABY KILLERS !!!
.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:31 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:38 PM | Report abuse
Bristol's ( huh?) untimely pregnancy is not a disaster. This happens to too many young girls. Hopefully dad is not also seventeen and unable to provide for a family. The disaster comes into play if the new parents are unable or unequipped to care for this child. The question here is, where were mom and dad when 'Bristol' needed someone to be advising her of the responsibulity of unprotected sex. Will this become a strong talking point for the prolife group because the family has optioned to keep the child, or an even stronger talking point against the religious rights objection to teaching teenagers about unprotected sex, and contraception?
Posted by: Carol | September 1, 2008 2:38 PM | Report abuse
.
...and Plagiarist-Joe's son is one of the slimiest lobbyists in Washington.
So what to both!
/
Posted by: ALEX H. | September 1, 2008 2:38 PM | Report abuse
@raul:"...Growing up is a learning experience, and Bristol has a tough road ahead of her. She should be left alone."
Don't worry, she will be alone -- her mother will be on the campaign trail.
Posted by: cherie | September 1, 2008 2:38 PM | Report abuse
this has nothing to do with OBAMA he has not said anything. to imagine his kid pregnant is totally stupid!! no one would agree that she should have had a an abortion we are saying that Sarah could not give her the right tools to keep from getting preg. McCain has very poor judgment and lets see that's 2 dirty little secrets in 2 day!! whats next nude pics from her modeling days!!
Posted by: t | September 1, 2008 2:38 PM | Report abuse
I just want to know if the baby-mamma wears an American flag proudly.
Posted by: Jesus H Christ | September 1, 2008 2:38 PM | Report abuse
There's more to the story.
Palin preaches abstinence and abstinence-only sex education. She does not want teenagers to be taught about birth control.
While she was being governor- living at home in Wasilla- and her husband was working half-time on the North Slope, they apparently sent their daughter to live in Anchorage. So she apparently puts her political career above her responsibilities as a parent.
Part of the Palin "compelling story" is that she and Todd eloped (on August 29,1988). She her first born on April 20, 1989, or about 6 weeks early if she became pregnant after the marriage.
However, all pictures of her- and her own statements- make it clear that she carried the baby to full term.
So she didn't believe in abstinence for herself either, nor is she telling the truth about this matter either.
Posted by: ratfishtim | September 1, 2008 2:38 PM | Report abuse
This whole Palin thing is bizarre. How McCain feels he can pick her to fill in for him when he flat lines is a serious question about his judgement.
We could conceivably have Sarah Palin as the President of the United States.
But I am quite surprised she has accepted his offer. She should realize she knows very little about what she is getting into. Is she naieve to think she is qualified to be VP?
And if she is such a great family person I question her decision to drag her family from a relatively good working environment to Washington, DC. Like the Clampett's moving to Beverly hills.
No seriously, I wonder if its a great move for her but a real tough move for her kids and husband. She may not realize what she is giving up compared to what her new life will be like. Especially for her family.
Me thinks she should stay in Alaska where she is off to a great career as their governor. Good luck!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:38 PM | Report abuse
HYPOCRITES - all of the Republicans running on their Pro Life high horse are HYPOCRITES. You can't be pro life AND pro war. And pro death penalty.
I guess nobody seemed to notice the whole Cheney's daughter is a lesbian in a serious life partnership with a child but opposes advancing civil rights to gay/lesbians.
HYPOCRITES -- some of the worst hypocrisy I've seen in my LIFETIME!! And my parents were pot-smoking Reagan lovers! HYPOCRITES!!
Posted by: athinker | September 1, 2008 2:37 PM | Report abuse
Way to go, all you red state born-again Republican hypocrits with false Christian values. First VP Cheney's daughter is a lesbian then a 17 year old is 7 months pregnant. You are great role models for the rest of us.
Posted by: Raraseal | September 1, 2008 2:37 PM | Report abuse
Already, the one thing that the GOP ticket seem very capable of boosting in the next four years, is the number of teenage weddings.
Posted by: Puzzled European | September 1, 2008 2:37 PM | Report abuse
The mother sarah so intent in hiding her daughter's condition, TAKES HER OUT OF SCHOOL AND LIES ABOUT THE REASONS (HELLO, ANYONE CARE?) oh, I should say I'M A CHRISTIAN REPUB MOTHER for holy cow - LIEING is LIEING period. LIes about it, to cover up HER (Sarah's shame ) then when she's asked to take the VP slot, LOOK AT ALL THE PHOTOS with Bristol trying to cover it up - HOW SAD FOR BRISTOL. Not only does your entire town now know, when you were at home you were not home SICK you were Pregnant and THAT IS OK It is ! but MOM taking you on the campaign trail with a blanket over your tummy and now for the world to know, Bristol is the one neglected here and being asked to care for the baby. Who do you think was at home caring for the baby Trig all this time ? BRISTOL ... that's why she was at home to care for Sarah's baby... give' me a break. THAT LEADERSHIP FOLKS...
Posted by: all so sad | September 1, 2008 2:37 PM | Report abuse
If Sarah Palin is such a great social conservative why did she not teach her daughter that premarital sex is a sin.
If she cant even keep her own home in order how can America have confidence she can help run the country.
I just switched from McCain to Bob Barr.
Posted by: Patrick | September 1, 2008 2:37 PM | Report abuse
THIS IS HER (BRISTOL)"SECOND" BABY. THE GOV. (SARAH PALIN) TRIED TO COVER-UP THE FIRST BABY BORN WITH DOWN'S SYNDROME, AS CLAIMING IT AS HER OWN CHILD.
Posted by: Come clean and tell the truth, Gov. Palin! | September 1, 2008 2:37 PM | Report abuse
The Republican Creed:
Personal ambition before family and party before country.
Posted by: MorganaLeFay | September 1, 2008 2:37 PM | Report abuse
what does this have to do with john mccain vs. obama?
Posted by: msnbc man | September 1, 2008 2:37 PM | Report abuse
I smell a cover up. I believe that Trig is Bristols and the truth will come out.
I feel really sad because I also feel that Gov Palin is being used by John McCain or whom ever is pulling John McCain's strings.
But at the same time we dont need a Britney Spears mom as VP.
Posted by: Brenda | September 1, 2008 2:37 PM | Report abuse
It looks to me like no one was home to instill any "family values" in these Palin children, or to keep track of what they were doing and with whom. If Sarah Palin wanted to be in politics, her husband should have stayed home. This is not my kind of America.
Posted by: Lisa G | September 1, 2008 2:37 PM | Report abuse
Between her lies on Troopergate, her lie about the Bridge to Nowhere, her improper firings as mayor of Wasilla, and the shocked reaction of major papers in Anchorage and Wasilla, Democrats have all they need on Sarah Palin.
What they should go after here is the fact that McCain/Palin didn't tell the truth on Friday, and used a natural disaster as cover up for their media dump (both pregnancy and DUI). A sad, cynical move if you ask me.
Posted by: John M. | September 1, 2008 2:37 PM | Report abuse
After reading the post from Kuskka53 it appears to me that "highschool students" in Alaska are pretty articulate...sounds very similar to something that would be put out by someone on a campaign staff.
Posted by: MDUNC | September 1, 2008 2:37 PM | Report abuse
Bristol Palin loves Jesus and has decided to keep her baby. She was also born in Alaska a state that borders Russia. Having met her at least once it is clear that she will be a highly effective and experienced Secretary of State in the McCain Administration.
McCain choosing Palin after one meeting highlights his rash gambling decision making and lake of judgement. Palin accepting the job as VP despite her lacking of qualifications and experience and considering her family situation highlights her own selfishness and ego.
For the Republican to rally around someone that they know nothing about soley because of claims to social conservatisms calls into question the judgement of the entire party.
They seem to have lost sight of the fact that it is the Bush/Cheney Republican record that Americans are seeking change from. They are not going into the 2008 election riding on the success and popularity of their incumbent.
It appears that George Bush has finally realized the ramifications of his unpopularity this week with a hurricane, a Republican Convention and the sudden oddness of the McCain candidacy.
It appears the Republicans do have reason to be concerned about McCain, he has totally sold him self to most discredit and unpopular wing of the repubican party, the social conservatives who have been running the show since GW was elected in 2000.
Posted by: Lindel | September 1, 2008 2:37 PM | Report abuse
"The rumors were not started by Liberals, or the Obama campaign, the rumors about Sarah and her family were started in Alaska before she was picked.
Stop blaming Obama for McCain's bad judgement."
It's entirely the fault of Obama/Biden/Axelrod that this rumor was place on DailyKos and remained in play until Bristol's actual pregnancy was announced.
As I said, this trio of thugs make Rove look like Mother Goose.
Posted by: jspivey | September 1, 2008 2:36 PM | Report abuse
Where is the hate coming from the Obama camp? I think the wing nuts expect hate, because that would be the reaction if one of Obama's daughters became pregnant. But Democrats know that out-of-wedlock-pregnancies are reality of everyday life. I sincerely hope that Gov. Palin exhibits her family values and has the decency to be there for her family during these tough times.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:36 PM | Report abuse
Let's see...a walking, talking, breathing example of how abstinence-only education doesn't work. And the mother is on record as being against comprehensive sex education. And the McCain/Palin campaign is trying to frame this as a privacy issue.
Dream on, John and Sarah, dream on.
Posted by: Mirele | September 1, 2008 2:36 PM | Report abuse
What would people be saying if a man decided to travel around the country for a better job even though he had already had a really good job at the same time as he had an infant child with disabilities and a pregnant teenage daughter. They would say he needs to be at home supporting his poor over burdened wife. Why isn't the reverse true? Go home Sarah. Take care of your family.
Posted by: TJ | September 1, 2008 2:36 PM | Report abuse
While I can appreciate the angst this has created for Palin and her family, choosing not to abort simply cannot in good conscience be criticized. It is the personal choice of the girl and her family.
However, this does demonstrate once again that the "abstinence only" position by conservatives regarding sex education is foolhardy. It doesn't work and is irresponsible. Palin's daughter now becomes the poster child for more responsible sex education -- abstinence only is a failure!
Posted by: D. Smith, N.C. | September 1, 2008 2:36 PM | Report abuse
Americans never were 17, and have always held women to a different judgement standard than themselves.
Palin is more average, experienced, and acceptable than Obama, who couldn't run with a woman vp. Remember?
Tell me more about Obama's momma, who didn't abort.
American women refuse to wear head scarves, be treated as second class citizens, or abort all the time.
Get over it.
Posted by: dotty | September 1, 2008 2:36 PM | Report abuse
Some of the comments are on the cruel side...however, the Republicans vote for candidates who drop bombs on little kids and old ladies...pot calling the kettle black there folks.
Posted by: stan | September 1, 2008 2:36 PM | Report abuse
Governor Palin is a real piece of work, isn't she. She decides to have another child, her fifth, at the age of 43. Anyone with half a brain (except maybe GWB) knows that this is a very high risk age for Down Syndrome.
Now, it seems that her 17 year old daughter is pregnant. Who is going to be taking care of her daughter and her son while she is politicking all over the US?
I believe in both parents being involved but this seems like a bit much for dear old dad. Anyway, when dealing with a handicapped child, the amount of attention they receive in the first few years of life are critical to how much they will be able to learn and how well they will be able to function. I question her priorities.
As a moderate, I was on the fence as to where my vote would go in November. I don't really like Obama, Biden or McCain.
Something about Sarah Palin being a heartbeat away from the presidency gives me a case of the heebie jeebies. I guess I will do the same way I did with Dukakis and Kerry. I will just hold my nose and vote for the least idiotic candidates, Obama and Biden.
McCain could have possibly swayed me by choosing Huckabee. He seems like the most genuine person who ran this time. What in the world was he thinking?
Posted by: thelastmoderate | September 1, 2008 2:36 PM | Report abuse
Another example of how well abstinence only works. Also, while I have nothing against working mothers, a woman with a premature baby with Down's Syndrome and a pregnant 17 year old needs to spend more time with her time with her family not campaigning for VP. Of course the husband/father can do many things (although I believe he'll be campaigning also), but this family needs a lot of care from both parents. No one can seriously argue she can provide that and run a campaign. Her choices show bad judgment on her part and her selection show monumentally poor judgment on the part of McCain.
Posted by: Hulett | September 1, 2008 2:36 PM | Report abuse
In an ideal world (hah!), Bristol Palin's pregnancy would not factor into this election at all. Family matters should be just that -- the family's business. But the McCain camp is blatantly touting Sarah Palin's parenting choices as a main reason why we should vote for the Republican ticket. That's obvious. Plus, she's so unknown, with such a sparse public record, that we have no information to go on. We are feasting on every tiny crumb we can get, and it is a poor-man's meal. At least with the other candidates, we have voting records, speeches, media interviews, and 18 months of a campaign to go on. (Obama, the relative unknown, wrote two books about himself, for Pete's sake.) What do we have for Sarah Palin? A few newspaper clippings and what the McCain campaign has been trying to sell to us. The media (and dare I say, the blogosphere) is doing its job; it's filling in the myriad blanks. We deserve to know who our potential VP is. The responsibility for this sad situation lies squarely with John McCain.
Posted by: Sad State of Affairs | September 1, 2008 2:36 PM | Report abuse
This isn't funny. Aren't there any other parents of teenagers out there? You can't blame Gov. Palin; this could happen to any parent, no matter how good. HOWEVER, I CAN'T understand how she would agree to run for nat'l office when she HAD to know this would come out. HOW COULD SHE DO THAT TO HER DAUGHTER? She must be an ambitious monster. Her family is going through a crisis and needs her; she never should have agreed. (And this isn't a sexist thing; any dad who would do that is a monster, too. I'm a dad.)
Posted by: Dan4 | September 1, 2008 2:36 PM | Report abuse
Hilarious. After Christian conservatives spend so much effort trying to tell people how to live, the public has to suddenly respect the private life of an unwed 17 year old girl.
The "family values" politics has always been pure demagoguery.
Posted by: Greg | September 1, 2008 2:36 PM | Report abuse
I personally was an undecided voter leaning toward McCain. But over the last couple of weeks I have been very insulted. Insulted by the fact that McCain would think that women are stupid enough to vote for him ONLY because Palin is a woman. His judgement is off, because if Palin had to step in for whatever reason, I am absolutely PETRIFIED since she has NO foreign policy experience and just got her passport last year. Obama di have a very successful trip overseas, the world, not just this nation is watching. And now to find out that Palin's 17 year old unmarried daughter is pregnant. The very thing they are funning off of (family values) is a hoax and does not, I repeat does not, set the kind of example I would want my daughter to look up to. McCain will not get my vote - he made a bad judgement call with this pick. Very risky. Very bad.
Posted by: Danielle | September 1, 2008 2:36 PM | Report abuse
ATTENTION : SHOULD THE CHILD-WELFARE-AGENCY INTERVENE and take into custody ALL OF Mrs Palins Children ????
THATS EXACTLY WHAT Republican Governnor led adminsitration did in TEXAS when some teenagers in a sects compound became pregnant .
Posted by: BOB | September 1, 2008 2:36 PM | Report abuse
I find it very interesting that if it were joe biden's 17 year old unmarried daughter who was pregnant the conservatives would be having a field day with this story and they would be calling for his resignation. just goes to show what the so-called conservative are REALLY all about.
Posted by: AmusedbytheRhetoric | September 1, 2008 2:36 PM | Report abuse
Governor Palin knew her daughter was pregnant and still decided to accept the VP slot? So, like McCain, she is putting herself and her ambitions before her family. And this is family values?! Good judgment? I think not.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:35 PM | Report abuse
Please! Won't some intrepid reporter ask "Which liberal blogs were pushing this rumor?", rather than just write down what some Republican flack said to write down. If a reporter asked, I bet they wouldn't get an answer. If a reporter looked into it, I bet they wouldn't find any such rumors being pushed. It's the spin to make reporters not look into whether McCain knew about this, and how embarrassing it would be to him if he didn't.
Posted by: Brendan | September 1, 2008 2:35 PM | Report abuse
What was in John McCain's mind when he selected this woman as his running mate? Why subject a family that is not his own on such a public stage? HE is the one that has made her the target of "bloggers" and those are the least of what they should be concerned about. With just ONE of the issues stressing this family, there should be concerns. Their 19 year old is off to Iraq. Their 4mo old has Downs Syndrome. Her sister's just been through an ugly divorce, where she got in trouble for trying to have him fired then fired his boss for not doing so(this kind of thing may happen more in some of the smaller, more "personal" states like Alaska, where is EVERYthing is pretty much publicly known). Now her 17 year old daughter is pregnant. Will she lose her health insurance if she marries the (assumed) teenaged father? Will she wait until after the baby is born? What else can happen here? Will the "First Dude" be discovered with a lady on the side?
Sorry. No matter how strong she is, these kind of family issues HAVE to have some effect on her abilities to function as a public personality -- and a candidate for the Vice Presidency of the US. McCain should gently send her back to Alaska. We don't need this kind of drama. This election is too important. McCain's judgement is really impossible to determine.
Posted by: RadioMom | September 1, 2008 2:35 PM | Report abuse
I agree this should be a private family matter.
The problem is that ReThugs have made "family values" a centerpiece of their party for more than a decade.
Live by family values, die by family values, I say.
We may just have seen the death of "abstinence only" sex ed, though, and that would be a GOOD thing.
And as for "leave the kids out of it" the ReThugs adopted that attitude after harrassing Chelsea Clinton.
Wet Start has a legitimate reason for taking that position after Dim Son spread false rumors about his adopted daughter in 2000. But you think he would have seen the danger in naming as candidate for Veep a "family values" woman whose own daughter wasn't living by those tenets.
I doubt Wet Start knew about this pregnancy before he brought Sarah Barracuda onto his ticket, but if he did WTF was he thinking, subjecting this 17-year-old to the national spotlight? And if he didn't, well, ....
Posted by: CalGal | September 1, 2008 2:35 PM | Report abuse
this is bristol's SECOND baby. trig is hers with either this high school boy or some other boy (maybe she gets around) and then this baby. so she's got two now. wow. she's gonna have her hands full. another young family on public assistance with no high school degrees. great example for young america. if she can't keep her legs closed, what's the point of teaching abstinence and no contraceptives? duh.
Posted by: emma | September 1, 2008 2:35 PM | Report abuse
Let's see now . . .
In less than four days since McCain's announcement of his VP choice, we discover that she's being investigated for ethical improprieties, her 17 year old daughter is with child out of wedlock and . . .
What's next? McCain's judgement? There's an oxymoron of biblical proportion. And by the way: rumors don't get 17 year old unmarried girls pregnant. It takes a little more than that.
Posted by: hayeseric | September 1, 2008 2:35 PM | Report abuse
Congratulations and Best Wishes to the Palin family!
Posted by: Mr. & Mrs. J. A. Semilian | September 1, 2008 2:35 PM | Report abuse
Well, at least the Republicans have gotten the sex out of the men's restrooms and back into the bedrooms of unmarried minors where it belongs.
Posted by: LarryCraig | September 1, 2008 2:35 PM | Report abuse
SARAH PALIN!!!!
GO HOME TO ALASKA, WE IMPLORE YOU!!
YOUR VILLAGE IS MISSING ITS IDIOT AND
YOUR KIDS COULD USE SOME PARENTING!!!!!
Posted by: misssymoto | September 1, 2008 2:35 PM | Report abuse
Given that Obama has the stable, happy family, and given that the Republicans have the gigolos, the cheaters, the disfigured dumped wife, the divorces and the unwed mothers, why do the Republicans claim to be the party of "Family Values"?
Posted by: MorganaLeFay | September 1, 2008 2:34 PM | Report abuse
Oh! Please, hopefully someone will ask this V.P. candidate an intelligent questions, like do you believe teenagers who engage in premarital sex, should practice "safe sex", i.e., birth control, i.e. wear a condom, or take birth control pills, etc. etc. If this candidate does not even have the common sense to tell her own children to practice safe sex, what is this country coming too? if an elected official does not even have one iota of common sense. And we want such a person having a "finger on a nuclear bomb" trigger in a worst case scenario? Jeez, we will be trouble then.
Posted by: magsmile | September 1, 2008 2:34 PM | Report abuse
If this woman cared about her two special needs children (trig and pregnant 17 yr old) she would never consider taking on the position to run for VP let alone be VP. Her other children need her too, to help them grow up without having to repeat her sister's mistake. And teenage pregnancy is a mistake for both mother and child, setting them far back for future economic progress in our society. Let the conservqtives put a pretty face on it, and then they deserve a huge apology to the Jamie Lynn Spears of the world and other young mothers that they and their favorite commentators, such and Bill O'Rielly, feel compelled to trash.
What is the third shoe to fall, that the father is a serial womanizer and has a child or children on the side.
Palin's family may too much resemble the disfunctional American Family, and I feel sad for them. However, this woman should take care of her family first, and put her political aspirations on hold.
Posted by: Nclwtk | September 1, 2008 2:34 PM | Report abuse
"Knowing that her daughter was pregnant, Sarah Palin should never have accepted the VP selection."
You seem to be saying that the Palins should be hiding and hanging their heads in shame.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:34 PM | Report abuse
Growing up is a learning experience, and Bristol has a tough road ahead of her. She should be left alone. Her mother, on the other hand, is making horrible decision after horrible decision and LYING to cover her tracks. Check her ethics and spending records as governor and mayor in Alaska.
Posted by: Raul | September 1, 2008 2:34 PM | Report abuse
If Republicans want ANY hope of overturning Roe v. Wade (like McCain eventually wants), they will HAVE to let Democrats push harder (ha ha) for contraceptives and better sex education (not just in schools but in general), so this type of thing does not happen so much.
Compromise is not a weakness, it is a way to get things done!
Posted by: Spencer | September 1, 2008 2:34 PM | Report abuse
The rumors were not started by Liberals, or the Obama campaign, the rumors about Sarah and her family were started in Alaska before she was picked.
Stop blaming Obama for McCain's bad judgement.
Posted by: kate in NC | September 1, 2008 2:33 PM | Report abuse
I'll bet you a ten-spot that the McCain "vetters" didn't know this. If they had they would have Shanghaied the young man and stood him up there beside the young woman as her "fiance" to "prebut" the news.
The carelessness they've exhibited makes you wonder. They selected a running mate under investigation by her own legislature, allowed her to be "for" the bridge before she was "against" it -- and she touted her new-found opposition as part of her Vice-Presidential credentials in her first statement as the running mate. Now they failed to find out about a 17 year-old unmarried daughter's pregnancy, FIVE MONTHS HENCE? One would have thought that Palin would have thought to mention that, wouldn't one? Rove has to be blowing a fuse over the incompetence of McCain's handlers.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:33 PM | Report abuse
Sounds like she chose politics before family. Then again, she should fire the nanny. Somebody, obviously, was not on their job.
Posted by: Cymp | September 1, 2008 2:33 PM | Report abuse
If it were a 17 yr old Obama daughter pregnancy, hippocrite conservatives would be calling the girl and her family godless sinners.
Posted by: jk | September 1, 2008 2:33 PM | Report abuse
I'm just insulted by the release of this info on Labor Day when nobody is watching TV and those who are find nothing but Gustav coverage on TV.
Great job of dumping the story on a "take out the trash" day.
Posted by: John Kiernan | September 1, 2008 2:33 PM | Report abuse
For Gov. Palin, it appears, personal interest/ambition takes precedence over her her daughter's welfare/interest. Why did she accept McCain's offer knowing full well she and her family will be subjected to media and public scrutiny? Did she not know, or care?
Hmm ... doesn't speak well of McCain's judgment, either.
Posted by: Elango | September 1, 2008 2:33 PM | Report abuse
Can you say, "Beverley Hillbillies?"
Posted by: Carlo | September 1, 2008 2:33 PM | Report abuse
Let him without sin cast stones.
Posted by: jen | September 1, 2008 2:33 PM | Report abuse
Hey:
I'm trying to understand your article. Democrats are not to say anything about a Vice-Pres. candidate who espouses family values at the same time she has a 17 year old daughter who is pregnant, a downs syndrome child she is still breast feeding,three other children at home, a husband working in the northern coast of Alaska, and we are to believe she can also campaign for Vice Pres. and show she is a good mother and wife, and prepared to run the country!!
Yea sure..sure
Posted by: douglas | September 1, 2008 2:33 PM | Report abuse
Well, even aside from the personal issues of Governor Palin's family - I am one independent voter who will now most surely be voting for Obama/Biden. It is one thing to say Obama is an elitist Harvard Law grad with only 6 years experience in state and federal government. It is quite another to say that a 44-yr old with only a bachelor's degree in journalism from Idaho Univ. and less than 2 yrs in (a small) state government is prepared to lead my country. Regardless of my agreement with her on a few issues, she is not ready and this is a dangerous situation. I don't fault her for trying - she may well lack the experience to know better. There is no excuse for McCain though.
Posted by: Gibson | September 1, 2008 2:33 PM | Report abuse
McCain-Palin '08 = Edwards-Spears '08
Posted by: cherie | September 1, 2008 2:33 PM | Report abuse
you might be a PALIN if..
... passing a billboard that reads, “say no to crack” has your entire family pulling up their pants.
... your wife’s hairdo was ever caught in a ceiling fan.
... you go to your family reunions looking for a date.
... your gene pool doesn’t have a “deep end.”
... you can’t marry your sweetheart because there is a law against it.
... you think a volvo is part of a woman’s anatomy.
... your senior prom had a daycare.
... you’ve ever laid rubber while traveling in a funeral procession.
... on easter you had moose.
... on the 4th of july you had moose.
... on thanksgiving you had moose.
... on christmas you had moose.
... and then for variety, on new years, you had moose.
... you’ve ever had to siphon gas from your snowmobile to put into your truck.
... you think paprika is where osama bin laden is hiding
Posted by: misssymoto | September 1, 2008 2:33 PM | Report abuse
This couldn't be more trailer-park tragic. (And funny). Tomorrow we could find out that Sarah Palin's grandmother sells drugs on the black market to supplement her church choir and the religious right would forgive it. Because, really, does any of this moral crap matter anyway? Of course not! This family is a total nightmare! Are the Republicans telling Americans that this is all they've got? Horrors!
Posted by: Dan Rains | September 1, 2008 2:32 PM | Report abuse
Can someone tell me whatever happened to coverage of the Tony Rezko scandal? That seems to have been buried REALLY fast. But now we can expect to hear the most vile rumor-mongering about Sarah Palin presented as confirmed fact, until definitively proven wrong.
Posted by: Dave | September 1, 2008 2:32 PM | Report abuse
This is a shame people. when we chinicea are suffering for ONE CHILD PLICY, choosing Sarah Palin with 5 kids and a 17 yrs old pregnant daughter has a bad message to the world. She even needs some help to handle her family issues.
Posted by: John | September 1, 2008 2:32 PM | Report abuse
This woman doesn't think, she is backwoods trailer trash. She doesn't have a clue. Her first job as Mayor they tried to run a recall election on her because she was so bad. This is a farce.
-----------
I am very concerned that Palin had a baby FOUR MONTHS ago, with disabilities yet, and is basically going to abandon this baby in order to be VP. Who's going to raise this baby? What kind of "family values" are these?
Posted by: MiddleAmerica | September 1, 2008 2:28 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:32 PM | Report abuse
Other breaking news of the day: Palin's husband has a DWI arrest.
So far, we have:
1. A sex scandal
2. An ethics inquiry
3. A DWI
What we're missing to win Republican Hypocrisy BINGO is:
4. A out of the closet gay man or woman
5. A suspicious death/murder
6. An affair
It's a short week, but I'm sure we'll get to it before Thursday anyhow.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:32 PM | Report abuse
She accepted the VP nomination knowing that her daughter would be exposed to national ridicule. Quite the mom.
Posted by: Burgess | September 1, 2008 2:32 PM | Report abuse
Yes, Sarah the "New Republican Terminator" is going to be the most talk about VP in history. I am sure Jay Leno and SNL will how have more material than they need. So out with the "OLD" jokes.
I wonder what Nancy Pelosi, Spike Lee, John Edwards, Bill Clinton, Al Sharpton, "NOW" Barabara Walters, and Jessie Jackson will say.
Now Chris if you believe that the OBAMA campaign is not behind it's army of bloggers I have a bridge to sell you named Brooklyn.
VJ Machiavelli
http://www.vjmachiavelli.blogspot.com
Posted by: VJ Machiavelli | September 1, 2008 2:32 PM | Report abuse
Mccain meets her twice. She has just recently obtained a passport. She had probably traveled to DisneyLand as her great excursion into the lower 48.
'Look under the hood' of John McCain!
Google "admirals son + PW songbird" to read about John McCain 'the war hero'
Posted by: TruthWalksOn Water | September 1, 2008 2:32 PM | Report abuse
Interesting, no talk of Obama abandoning his daughters during their most formative years. Also interesting how people seem to know all the truths about a person based on one of 2 letters next to their name. I can't imagine wanting to hate someone so much; someone you don't even know. This is a miserable bunch of people.
Posted by: ja | September 1, 2008 2:31 PM | Report abuse
Yeah Dave the Dems gave Palin 5 kids, a newborn with special needs, and forced her daugther to get pregnant so they can talk about it. If she is soooo smart, she would have declined McSame's losing white house bid and fouced on the important issues at home.
Posted by: Dave's alter-ego | September 1, 2008 2:31 PM | Report abuse
Now, see, why is it that Republicans have such interesting daughters? Dems gave us Margaret Truman and Amy Carter and Chelsea Clinton. Dull, dull, dull. But Bible Thumping, family values Republicans gave us the hard partying Bush twins and gay Mary Cheney (who had an out of wedlock baby with her longtime Lesbian lover) and now Bristol Palin, 17, unmarried, and preggers. In high school, word was that if you wanted a good time, date the preacher's daughter. Guess little has changed...
Posted by: crunk | September 1, 2008 2:31 PM | Report abuse
The CRUELTY OF THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS is out in force this week - the SEXISM OF THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS - AND NOW THEIR ATTITUDE ABOUT A TEENAGE PREGNANCY.
I GUESS ALL THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS WOULD PREFER TO KILL THE BABY.
BABY KILLERS !!!
.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:31 PM | Report abuse
Best wishes to the Palin family. Stay strong.
McCain Palin in November.
Regsitered democrat fro McCain Palin
Posted by: AsBee | September 1, 2008 2:31 PM | Report abuse
McCain gang hardly realized that now most women in America can not identify with Gov. Palin. A majority of women voters do not have unwed pregnant teen daughter. Are they suggesting a new trend? Let's not follow this clan, ladies.
Use head over heart, what Republicans hate if you do, for now in this and all other elections. We admire you for your brilliance, character and dignity - so please think freely for yourselves.
Posted by: O.P. Neon | September 1, 2008 2:31 PM | Report abuse
If this were a democrat the religious right would make such a loud squeal that it effectively would sink the candidate. The media should not let this hypocrisy slide rather they should be seriously called out on this.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:31 PM | Report abuse
"A true 'Christian' would not ..."
Who gives a rat's arse about Christians and what they believe anyway. They've been blathering at us and bullying us and beating us over the head with their stupid Bible for waaaaaaay too long. They need to either shut up or be shipped to another planet. Not everybody in the United States is Christian. Can these dopes wrap their teeny little minds around that fact?
Posted by: jspivey | September 1, 2008 2:31 PM | Report abuse
Seven Proud wrote:
Who is the moron that said Palin does not believe in "Choice"?
That is inherently incorrect.
Those of us who are so-called "pro-life" believe we are making a CHOICE in favor of life, as opposed to a decision in favor of death.
Actually, that is what is so amusing about the so-called "pro-life" side--what they do is cleverly try and mask their real position:
PRO-DEATH.
Thanks, but I'm proud to be a pro-life side member.
------------------------------
If you are gonna name call, I will proudly state that there is no choice for Palin's daughter here. She has to have the baby. Had she been the victim of force or incest she would have to have the baby. The GOP is forcing the issue. There is no other option. You think that is ethical. I think it is sick and perverse.
I do not use the term pro life, because it does not accurately describe your values. The reality is, after the child is born, you religious bigots could care less about the fetus. That is why you are against universal health care.
The term I use for people like you is pro-ban, because you want to impose your will on everyone else and a ban a woman's reproductive choices, even in matters of rape and incest.
How much you wanna bet that this poor girl was never even taught birth control. And now, her mother's ill-advised decision to run is forcing her to undergo this sort of scrutiny. That is just plain cruel.
I would be very careful about using the word 'moron' if I were you, unless I were looking into a mirror.
Posted by: scootmandubious | September 1, 2008 2:31 PM | Report abuse
Even if Palin was a man, she is the wrong choice for a thousand reasons. Obama has this in the bag. I do wish Hilary was running for VP but she will be in there somewhere high. Joe Biden is awesome, an excellent speaker, great experiance, I remember liking him from day one of the Dem's debates. Go Obama! America needs you more than ever!!!!!
Posted by: Obama08 | September 1, 2008 2:31 PM | Report abuse
This goes to the heart of McCain's judgement to remain silent and announce. To have this come out now, it goes to the heart of Palin's judgement, parenting skills, awareness of family, etc. Before Sarah Palin becomes VP of the greatest power in the free world, maybe she should become a leader in her own family. The republican blogs are saying this could happen to any family. That problems happen all the time, they are discrediting the fact that good parenting skills are truly at the middle of her daughters pregnancy. I realize we're dealing with Alaska here, and it seems her 17 year old age (being under 18) is fine for them. I call it statatory rape, I think the young man that impregnated this young women should step up and be a man and announce himself to the world? The say privacy this and that, to heck with privacy, this is called "VETTING" and the US public has it's right through a free press to pursue the matter as it sees fit, not what bunch of bloggers state.
I welcome the free press that has the courage to seek this story to it's roots. To see the person that Sarah Palin is.
If attacks on Obama's youth and background are acceptable so are Palin, family and associations. You don't get a free pass just because it's "private".
Posted by: Darr West | September 1, 2008 2:31 PM | Report abuse
Poor parenting by Palin and worse judgement by McCain.
And who's going to be looking after this brood ? Her husband, all by himself ?
Because the last time I checked, VP was a full time job. Of course with her VP salary and the VP's residence and perks, money wouldn't be a problem.
And you can bet there's going to be a shotgun wedding. The kid (we'll assume the father is a kid) who knocked Palin's daughter up, probably understands the business end of a double barrel 12 gauge.
Posted by: MA | September 1, 2008 2:31 PM | Report abuse
Shotgun wedding will in ‘Vogue’
Anyone giving a bachelor-party/fundraiser for the born-again Maverick’s Veep-in-law?
Posted by: Sam | September 1, 2008 2:30 PM | Report abuse
I find it highly coincidental that many of the comments here, are the same comments posted on various other leftwing blogs. "McCain showed bad judgment" "Bristol will have a miscarriage" "Palin is not ready to lead"
Posted by: Jeff | September 1, 2008 2:30 PM | Report abuse
Family values my a##... Sounds like simple White..... Trash to me... Dont worry they are governors in alaska... this is sweet
Posted by: crock | September 1, 2008 2:30 PM | Report abuse
My question is: Does the Vice President's house at the Naval Observatory have room for all these people? Seriously.
Posted by: aaldea | September 1, 2008 2:30 PM | Report abuse
Confirming the apparently impossible, a McCain-Palin victory would now actually sink American prestige around the world to a level EVEN LOWER than Bush-Cheney has sunk it already.
Posted by: stan | September 1, 2008 2:30 PM | Report abuse
I am so bitter and angry that people are not following along with what former Democratic chair Don Fowler had to say about Gustav being God's will against the Republicans. There are many of the far-left members of the Democratic Party -- angry, bitter leftists like me who read firedoglake and are secure in our gender identity -- that completely agree with Fowler. After all, it is only right that the right be made to look bad if things go bad in New Orleans. It serves them right if there is vast destruction of property -- they should never have nominated someone with little-to-no experience to serve at the highest levels of government. After all, Obama Hussein Barack was a community organizer during his drug-use days, so of course he can give a good speech and bring about change and be looked upon as our savior.
The Repugs deserve this pregnancy rumor exploded and they deserve to have New Orleans flooded. That is what many of us angry, bitter leftists want to see happen.
Posted by: twin_peaks_nikki | September 1, 2008 2:30 PM | Report abuse
Oh my, pregnant? The scandal of the century! Plagerism and drugs is one thing, but a pregnancy? I am astounded at how much more interest the media has shown in Palin than in the other three candidates combined. I wonder why? Finally, someone on either ticket who is not at all jaded by Washington. And I like it.
Posted by: DROD | September 1, 2008 2:30 PM | Report abuse
Knowing that her daughter was pregnant, Sarah Palin should never have accepted the VP selection. It is a well-known fact that running for PUBLIC office makes your life public. I feel sorry for her daughter, that her mother chose ambition over family privacy.
Posted by: beth | September 1, 2008 2:30 PM | Report abuse
Obama could pretty much go on vacation at this point. It really makes me wonder if the two parties are colluding some sort of power sharing agreement the way the McCain people seem to be putting the nails into their own coffin.
Posted by: Team McLame | September 1, 2008 2:30 PM | Report abuse
Abstinence only anyone?
Posted by: Tony in L.A. | September 1, 2008 2:30 PM | Report abuse
"I love the implicit sexism here. If Michele Obama had a Downs child would you say that Barack shouldn't run for president because of the time demands?"
If he entered the race under those circumstance, NO I WOULD NOT HAVE VOTED FOR HIM. It would show bad judgment on his part to seek an office that would take him away from hsi family so often and be so demanding of his time. But, he didn't.
Posted by: kreuz_missile | September 1, 2008 2:30 PM | Report abuse
bristol palin was out of school for five months - with mono. i had mono in college. one of the worst reported cases by my doctor. even made a medical journal. i was out of school. for one month.
Posted by: miami | September 1, 2008 2:30 PM | Report abuse
For Mike who commented about the Democrats posting here not being Christian.... Do not assume to know anyone's religion. Also, be aware that most Democrats that don't have an issue with Bristol's pregnancy are not even going to bother to read these articles, much less post comments. I am a Democrat AND a Christian (yes, the two can and do cooexist) and I feel for what the family is going through. It is just a shame that it had to come out in the limelight due to a few bloggers who felt the need to make up something about Sarah Palin. I don't feel Sarah Palin was a wise pick for McCain. But that has noting to do with her daughter getting pregnant. Stick to the ISSUES people. What is happening to Bristol is a private matter. We need to be discussing Palin's views and experience in areas like the environment, alternative energy, the war and the economy.
Posted by: Cindy Brown | September 1, 2008 2:30 PM | Report abuse
The only way this gets better is if John Edwards is the father.
Posted by: Hahahahaha | September 1, 2008 2:30 PM | Report abuse
Now Mrs. Palin's daughter Bristol is pregnant- possibly for the second time?
What does that say about what happens when both parents are gone 90% of the time? Family values? This is simply ludicrous.
Old man McCain said he knew about this. Why didn't he share it with us? I really doubt that the vetting people had any idea.
Posted by: Elizabeth | September 1, 2008 2:30 PM | Report abuse
Be sure to write your next story about the same preganancy, but don't forget to mention that it might only be 3 months along, and is quite possibly Bristol's second child, the first being Trig who she can be seen lovingly holding like the good mother she probably is.
Don't forget to include a few photos of a completely unpregnant looking Governor Palin at "7 months." There are plenty of them out there.
It's not the pregnancy.... it's the lying and the coverup.
Posted by: Mike | September 1, 2008 2:30 PM | Report abuse
I'm confused as to how Palin's belated admission of her daughter's five-month pregnancy is honest or forthright. If this was so, it would have been disclosed 72 hours ago, along with her husband's drunk driving conviction.
Neither a high-profile pregnancy nor a police record can be hidden, so Palin 'fessed up. It wasn't admirable, it was inevitable and it calls John McCain's decision-making abilities into question.
Kudos to Sen. Obama for urging the press to stay out of such family matters and focus on the issues!
Posted by: Jamie Roberts | September 1, 2008 2:30 PM | Report abuse
I have a good friend of mine who became pregnant during her senior year in high school at the age of 17. She is from a good middle class family and 'it happened' anyway. She married the father right after she graduated from school and together they had two children. They in turn were great parents to their kids. Both of these children have gone on to be great kids and obtained scholarships and are working in very good jobs. My friend and her husband, married for almost 40 years, now have 2 very beautiful grand children from both of these kids.
Posted by: My views | September 1, 2008 2:29 PM | Report abuse
Uhmm... Yes, Palin is definately in touch with the regular American. She doesn't live in a trailer but she is certainly, uhm... common....
Posted by: The Truth | September 1, 2008 2:29 PM | Report abuse
I cannot believe the absurd comments that I am reading. Lets try to stick to the facts here. No one knows what has been said behind the Palin family doors. There is no major conspiracy here to force an unwed teenager to have a baby. The imagination of people on here beats anything that my 5 year old could come up with. Just because its on the internet doesn't mean that its true, people! The Palin family has enough issues right now to have to deal with the gossip mongers online. If I believed everything on line then Obama is a muslim and Michelle Obama isn't pround of this country....... oh wait, she did say that. Bad example
Posted by: Michelle | September 1, 2008 2:29 PM | Report abuse
If Bristol is about 5 months pregnant, that means this baby was conceived around the same time Trig was born... in April. This is the same time period Bristol was stuck at home with mononucleosis. She was too sick to attend school, but not sick enough for sex? This new story is obviously a cover up. She'll marry the guy and conveniently "lose" the faux baby.
Posted by: Alice L. | September 1, 2008 2:29 PM | Report abuse
"Mccain picked the Dukes of Hazzard for a VP you think don't this white trash family don't have a lot of crap in their past? This just gets better and better."
THE MASK HAS FINALLY COME OFF! Poor Barry Hussein. He doesn't even understand who is party consist of. Some of the most family-hating, racist every known to the modern world.
And the more they keep dog-piling Palin, the more women (including Hillary, Pelosi, Boxer) will feel sorry for her and her daughter.
KEEP IT UP DEMS, WE'RE LOVIN EVERY MINUTE OF IT!!
Posted by: Shame on Dems | September 1, 2008 2:29 PM | Report abuse
I have a 3 year-old daughter. If she becomes pregnant at the age of 17, I know I've done something wrong ... no if ands or buts about it. Will Sarah Palin take the same responsibility?
Posted by: Concerned Mother | September 1, 2008 2:29 PM | Report abuse
You are right, I do feel sorry for her and he whole dysfunctional family.
----------
Great, Obama campaign, picking 24x7 on a pleasant, appealing mother-to-be whom most Americans will find extremely sympathetic. Your hate is going to play really well in Peoria.
Posted by: jy | September 1, 2008 2:23 PM
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:29 PM | Report abuse
How unfortunate that Bristol is thrown into marriage with a brand new baby on the way at only 17. I doubt any Hillary supporters will find solidarity in this story and vote McCain.
Sara Palin was chosen for one reason only...to appease the social conservatives. John McCain is not adding to his base in choosing Palin, he simply got part of his base back.
Posted by: DLThomas | September 1, 2008 2:28 PM | Report abuse
This is outrageous!!! We are as a nation now talking about some bumpkins 17 year old girls kid...from alaska... When we should be talking about the canidates... This is a mess a sham... The GOP wanted this circus.... CIRCUS!!!!
Posted by: erik | September 1, 2008 2:28 PM | Report abuse
I am very concerned that Palin had a baby FOUR MONTHS ago, with disabilities yet, and is basically going to abandon this baby in order to be VP. Who's going to raise this baby? What kind of "family values" are these?
Posted by: MiddleAmerica | September 1, 2008 2:28 PM | Report abuse
Someone below mentioned nudie pics.
Every woman I know who has traded on her looks, or has been in a beauty pageant, or has worked as a model has several sets loose in the world.
The vanity drives it. An urge to record the power to show people after it is gone.
I would wager anything Palin has several sets floating around. Someone should ask her this point blank. Otherwise, there is a tremendous opportunity for black mail here - with a person who already has some shady dealing on their record.
Posted by: MorganaLeFay | September 1, 2008 2:28 PM | Report abuse
When my daughter turned 17 years old, those in authority and in education begin to teach my child her rights. She was the one that told me I was financially responsible but could not make her complete her high school education from home. Her words cut into me but I did not fight with her. I want to find out who, why and what prompted such advice.
It was sickness ran amuck in our schools. But today I am very active for the sake of my grandchildren. I hope they get better and well rounded advice. My daughter was given advice that is only going to breed anarchy. It was never good advice and when privacy laws interfer with good and positive parenting it is always done through hate and misguided teachers and administrators.
I understand how we went from point a to point b. Not because I was a bad parent but because I had turned my back and was working to meet the financial needs. I now back off from that desire to make money in lieu of working to make things more open and visible.
Educating and care for our children is not easily done. We have to stay vigilent and watch our own backs. Those in authority went bad. They made rules that lead to sacrifice by all of us. But they do not see it is affecting them.
Posted by: Washbasin | September 1, 2008 2:28 PM | Report abuse
Hey nice vetting job McCain campaign. Now we have a VP candidate with a Britney Spears-type daughter who will now have a shotgun wedding. Great family values there.
Posted by: Arnold | September 1, 2008 2:28 PM | Report abuse
Palin is clearly putting her own ambitions and career ahead of her family. Just when her newborn son and eldest daughter need her the most, she's going to say goodbye and hit the road on a tour of the USA. She cleary has a "me first" attitude. I pity the kids for having a mother like that.
Posted by: mcs | September 1, 2008 2:28 PM | Report abuse
Look, this thing has happened in a lot of families, including mine. You make the best of a miserable situation and see to it that the young people are OK. However, when McCain says that he was aware of the situation, it makes the choice even more debatable. Why ask for more complications? I'm sure we will hear more of this.
Posted by: Opa2 | September 1, 2008 2:28 PM | Report abuse
This is a sad day for this young girl. She must now deal with the scrutiny of the press for the next few months. It really is not a pleasant future for her. I am proud of the families convictions regarding keeping babies rather than the other option. I only hope that the family would respect someone else's decision to make a different decision. What goes on in someone's body is between them and their conscience. Government should have no role. If the abortion issues is allowed to divert our attention from other larger serious issues facing our country then we again will shed our role as leaders. If the government can tell us we can't do something within our bodies, they could just as easily tell us what we will do. Maybe with this revelation that we cannot legislate morality, we can spend more time on security, infrastructure and education.
Posted by: Gary | September 1, 2008 2:28 PM | Report abuse
When children have children, it’s largely because nobody is taking care of them; they’re lonely and lost. But we should never point a finger or suggest fault - after all, someone’s feelings might be hurt! And we all know that “feelings” are the most important value - right? Dead wrong. -
Dr. Laura
If she can't take care of her family, how can she take care of our country?
Posted by: Peter | September 1, 2008 2:28 PM | Report abuse
Make Palin in to a sympathetic figure? Oh PUHLEASE!
She wants to cram mandatory preganancy down the throat of every woamn in the US (and birth control, even the pill fails and not many husbands would be too thrilled with 'not doing it anyomer ever.)
She opposes any sex education - abstience only in her view. Hmmm....seems it does not work and the self-righteous preaching didn't take.
Teens who get preganant rarely finsih high school. 1 in 100,000 migh actually get a 4 year degree eventually (like 10 - 15 years eventually) but they are most definitely not going to go to Harvard.
Too kids with a baby. Uh huh....can you spell "mediciad"? They surely will be on welfare (mediciad) unless the paretns pay the cost for health insurance.
The odds of the marriage lasting longer than 4-5 years is a joke.
Then you have an unenducated divorcee with a kid and no job skills - and a young man on the hook for child support that he will never be able to pay regularly as hw will have no education or skills.
And Palin is supposed to be a role model? For what? The backwoods of Appalachia?
How nice to know that she wants this situation for every family in the US. They too can have to support one or 2 teenagers who have ababy, no education, no job skills, no income to pay the costs of raising a child, no health insurance, and a very sad future.
Posted by: Ann | September 1, 2008 2:27 PM | Report abuse
seems the baby story is dead (except for some who won't let it or the world trade center go). But what if the 17 year old had decided the pressure of having a child was too much and had an abortion. would mom have advocated jailing her, or, like McCain, have said that's her decision? that, and the anti sex education angle, are the issues.
so that takes care of the family values issue. I'll give her a pass on having a fifth child at her age with the risk of Downs, but with four kids already it's close. needing a basketball team is a bit thin.
and how exactly do we explain McCain's thing for beauty queens? a trophy wife is just cliche. a trophy VP is a whole new deal. and what about the mindset of a female who doesn't see beauty pageants as making women sex objects? or maybe she does? that should get lots of Hillary voters. not.
that leaves being anti corruption reformer? There's being the head of the corrupt Stevens 527 group that McCain thinks is the evil side effect of his stupid campaign reform bill he now opposes. but having more ethics complaints against others than have been filed against you isn't quite the measure. she was even warned that her pressure on Monegan was improper. she stands up to corruption? she fired the guy who stood up to hers, and then lied about it. there were plenty of proper ways to nail the SOB brother in law, why didn't she use them. she certainly had some clout, why not use it properly? and admit it?
against waste and earmarks? she was for the bridge and the timing of the earmark, and when that became a scandal, kept the money anyway. she didn't say no thanks to the money.
and on the same subject, wasted state funds to save a politically popular dairy that deserved to fail. so much for conservative free market principles or new politics.
that leaves the fact that she admits knowing nothing about foreign policy in general or the war in Iraq in particular.
so that leaves her experience of 18 months running a state with the population smaller than most counties in the lower 48 that doesn't have to have any taxes to raise or budget to balance (the tough decision is how much to give back to the people cause even a democrat couldn't spend all the oil revenue). so she has less responsibility over fewer people than the average county executive who has to balance a budget on local and property taxes. Doug Duncan could not have run for President after running Montgomery County (which I believe has more people than Alaska), and he had a tougher job.
before that she was mayor of a town smaller than my high school.
and she was picked to pander to the creationist evangelicals and wants to teach Genesis as science in our schools. that's not a maverick, it's a wimp.
did I leave anything out?
Posted by: JoeT | September 1, 2008 2:27 PM | Report abuse
Of COURSE the "social conservatives" are going to support her. They're preternaturally hypocritical, so why would you expect anything different?
Now, if it was someone associated with the Democratic ticket...
Posted by: RationalPerson | September 1, 2008 2:27 PM | Report abuse
McCain and Palin are both against sex education other than abstinence only programs in our schools. This is simply a living reminder that 'just say no' doesn't work.
Posted by: MsSwin | September 1, 2008 2:27 PM | Report abuse
Note from Obama campaign HQS: We must destroy Sarah Palin. We cannot have a smart, successful, conservative woman on the national political scene. In order to bring the country together, we must destroy her. We must stoop to the lowest depths of the gutter in order smear our political enemies. This will raise our standing in the world. Before we can establish "post-partisanship politics," we must eliminate anyone who opposes us.
Let's get to work!!
Posted by: Dave | September 1, 2008 2:27 PM | Report abuse
Hey Chris,
No mention that McCain/Palin are trying to bury their announcement behind the backdrop of a natural disaster that could kill Americans? That's okay? How disgusting. You can defend a young woman being pregnant, but McCain knew from day one and is announcing it now because of the storm. I dare a Republican to defend that decision. Country First? What a joke!
Posted by: pablo | September 1, 2008 2:27 PM | Report abuse
As for the article... :) I could care less that Bristol got with child...it happens...I honor her for having it...but she should give it up for adoption...marrying at 18? What a mistake this day and age to do..
Posted by: Theresa | September 1, 2008 2:27 PM | Report abuse
The new sexist democratic party. Obama's leadership in full force. Obama needs to apologize to all women for this discusting turn of events. Liberals of all colors have truly become most vile.
Obama with his "sweetie" attitude has set back woman rights 200 years. I hope he is proud of himself.
HILLARY DISAVOW OBAMA. Your endorsement of this thug is hurting woman. We do not deserve this horrible treatment no matter what party we belong to.
Posted by: Hillary2012 | September 1, 2008 2:27 PM | Report abuse
All I care about is POLICY! Not age, not family issues, none of the stuff our media loves to scream about 24/7. I demand smaller, a MUCH smaller federal gov't. If thats something these two bring to Washington so much the better. I am quite convinced they do hold this as an agenda item of full import.
Posted by: John T | September 1, 2008 2:26 PM | Report abuse
No comment from John Edwards yet.
.
Posted by: GT | September 1, 2008 2:26 PM | Report abuse
The Palins have too many issues to be running for the vice-presidency what with the crazy family feuds being investigated up in Alaska and the "is she pregnant or is she not" stories. These things are not the fault of the Democrats and I, for one, don't need any warnings about what to think from the likes of Cilliza.
These people look like the kind of trailer trash that belongs on the Jerry Springer show and John McCain's campaign has turned into a circus. For what it's worth, I don't think he knew about this or it would have been handled more adroitly. This all comes down to McCain's reckless failure to vet Palin and his use of her as a publicity stunt. The Palins are not ready for prime-time. All of this is the blowback from McCain's incompetent VP pick.
Posted by: Mary | September 1, 2008 2:26 PM | Report abuse
This is Dick Cheney's wet dream. A right wing zealot within a heartbeat of the White House- don't think for a minute that McCain had anything to do with the choice-- this has McCain's handlers fingerprints all over it-- a sneak preview of what a McCain presidency would look like while he lives in a bubble-- strings being pulled by the neocons.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:26 PM | Report abuse
The real news is not a pregnant teenager or her hypocritical parents. The real story here is that John McCain's judgement stinks! We can't afford poor leadership like this, not now -- not with the mess Bush/Cheney have left us to clean up. And the way McCain is presenting this -- linking Obama's name to it -- is just another galling example of Republicans refusing to take responsiblity for their own problems!
Posted by: pattyk | September 1, 2008 2:26 PM | Report abuse
Palin's daughter had first child, Trig, out of wedlock and Palin is pretending that he is her own. Now Bristol gets pregnant again at sixteen. This is clearly an argument that 1) abstinence education does not work; 2) sex education should be taught to teens; and 3) contraception should be readily available to teenagers.
The Republicans and their version of "family values" simply does not work.
Posted by: lorax | September 1, 2008 2:26 PM | Report abuse
god bless america
Posted by: samik | September 1, 2008 2:26 PM | Report abuse
I was going to vote for Obama anyway. Any of this personal mud slinging isn't going to change my mind either way. Personally, I think it's a good lesson for the religious right. The church is a hospital for sinners not an exclusive club for the perfect. I like this VP choice; I can actually identify with her as a mother and a woman; but I'm still not going to vote for McCain. I am against the educational, environmental, and foreign policies of the McCain/Bush administration.
Posted by: DemocratWoman | September 1, 2008 2:26 PM | Report abuse
Not a Palin fan AT ALL. But if she were a male candidate, nobody would be taking him to task for being a bad father and causing this situation for having a career as well as a family. Why isn't anyone blaming her husband for being a neglectful father? Surely he has responsibility as well.
Posted by: democrat | September 1, 2008 2:26 PM | Report abuse
Pardon me, I though this was a political blog, apparently I've stumbled into the re-hash of last seasons "Desperate Housewives".
This is the 2008 prime time lineup for the next few months folks, get used to it.
Posted by: Tim | September 1, 2008 2:26 PM | Report abuse
What kind of woman runs for office when she has five kids that include a four month old with down syndrome and a pregnant teenage daughter? Seriously, if she had any good judgement she would be staying home with her family and keeping htem out of the spotlight. Those kids are going to grow up so screwed up, and it looks like some of them already have from her being govenor/mayor and not paying attention to her kids.
Posted by: Alex | September 1, 2008 2:26 PM | Report abuse
Anyone who really thinks Trig is not Sarah's must be out of their mind. Do you really think Alaskans couldn't catch on that Bristol was getting bigger? Do you think Sarah walked around with a pillow under her shirt for months? Do you think they paid everyone off at the hospital where she gave birth (and if you do believe this don't you think those who were paid off would get a lot more money by coming out with the cover-up)? And don't you people know that the probability of having a Down Syndrome child goes up the older you get?
Posted by: jen | September 1, 2008 2:26 PM | Report abuse
Why is it taking so long for the daughter to get married? Seems to me they could have found a justice of the peace, even in rural Alaska, in the last five months. I'd guess that she had no intention of marrying the mysterious "Levi" until McCain's campaign told her she had to. If I were that boy's mama, I'd demand a paternity test before watching him walk down the aisle at the point of Todd Palin's shotgun.
Also, was this girl too stupid to use birth control, or did her mama keep her ignorant on purpose? If right wingers aren't going to let schools teach about birth control because that's the parents' job, then doesn't this prove Sarah Palin failed at the most important job on earth? And isn't she compounding that failure by abandoning her newborn and her unwed pregnant child in order to campaign? Shouldn't she be planning a wedding and nurturing a newborn right now?
And by the way, how does it help refute rumors of an unwed pregnancy of a teen when you confirm the rumors of an unwed pregnancy of that teen? Seems to me little Bristol could be the mother of what we call "Irish twins," i.e., those who are less than a year apart in age. I don't know she's due in December. No one but the girl and her OB/GYN know that information.
Posted by: TexDem | September 1, 2008 2:25 PM | Report abuse
Just because she's a lousy mother doesn't mean she's incapable of being a Veep. Just because McCain committed adultery and dumped his first wife for a beauty queen doesn't mean that he shouldn't be President. What politicians SAY and what they DO are two different things. Believe what you're told, not what you think.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 1, 2008 2:25 PM | Report abuse
I read that too on winkete that sarah palin might be pregnant. Baby machines. lol Can you imagine a prego vp, LOL. http://www.theveep.com
Posted by: Sidney | September 1, 2008 2:25 PM | Report abuse
I agree with Mike (2:15) but take exception to his comment - "oh I forgot they most likely had an abortion and killed the baby."
When it comes to the Left, killing the baby is the FIRST thing that comes to mind.
Posted by: foxborough | September 1, 2008 2:25 PM | Report abuse
seems the baby story is dead (except for some who won't let it or the world trade center go). But what if the 17 year old had decided the pressure of having a child was too much and had an abortion. would mom have advocated jailing her, or, like McCain, have said that's her decision? that, and the anti sex education angle, are the issues.
so that takes care of the family values issue. I'll give her a pass on having a fifth child at her age with the risk of Downs, but with four kids already it's close. needing a basketball team is a bit thin.
and how exactly do we explain McCain's thing for beauty queens? a trophy wife is just cliche. a trophy VP is a whole new deal. and what about the mindset of a female who doesn't see beauty pageants as making women sex objects? or maybe she does? that should get lots of Hillary voters. not.
that leaves being anti corruption reformer? There's being the head of the corrupt Stevens 527 group that McCain thinks is the evil side effect of his stupid campaign reform bill he now opposes. but having more ethics complaints against others than have been filed against you isn't quite the measure. she was even warned that her pressure on Monegan was improper. she stands up to corruption? she fired the guy who stood up to hers, and then lied about it. there were plenty of proper ways to nail the SOB brother in law, why didn't she use them. she certainly had some clout, why not use it properly? and admit it?
against waste and earmarks? she was for the bridge and the timing of the earmark, and when that became a scandal, kept the money anyway. she didn't say no thanks to the money.
and on the same subject, wasted state funds to save a politically popular dairy that deserved to fail. so much for conservative free market principles or new politics.
that leaves the fact that she admits knowing nothing about foreign policy in general or the war in Iraq in particular.
so that leaves her experience of 18 months running a state with the population smaller than most counties in the lower 48 that doesn't have to have any taxes to raise or budget to balance (the tough decision is how much to give back to the people cause even a democrat couldn't spend all the oil revenue). so she has less responsibility over fewer people than the average county executive who has to balance a budget on local and property taxes. Doug Duncan could not have run for President after running Montgomery County (which I believe has more people than Alaska), and he had a tougher job.
before that she was mayor of a town smaller than my high school.
and she was picked to pander to the creationist evangelicals and wants to teach Genesis as science in our schools. that's not a maverick, it's a wimp.
did I leave anything out?
Posted by: JoeT | September 1, 2008 2:25 PM | Report abuse
I thought McCain said that we're all supposed to put on our "American hats" and forget about politics during this storm, yet McCain/Palin have taken advantage of the storm to make the pregnancy announcement, so its coverage would be buried by Gustav headlines. Why couldn't they have made the announcement next week, so it wouldn't be a distraction from the national emergency?
Posted by: Dylan | September 1, 2008 2:25 PM | Report abuse
Yes, Palin would actually try to stop CHOICE. Maybe she will make us all life time members of the NRA as she is too. :)
Posted by: Theresa | September 1, 2008 2:25 PM | Report abuse













McCain made his own 'ugly' crack about Chelsea
I wonder if Bill Maher will really get some grief after his crack on his HBO show Friday in a brief discussion of Rush Limbaugh and oxytontin. He said that it was too bad that Rush didn't "croak" using the drug instead of Heath Ledger. His audience greeted it with silence and Bill seemed to realize that maybe he wished he could take that back. It reminded me of Robert Christgau's offhand complaint, after the murder of John Lennon, that it's always the Lennons and not the McCartneys that get bumped off.
Meanwhile, in the wake of the David Shuster suspension at MSNBC for his "pimped out" crack about Chelsea Clinton on the campaign trail, one is reminded of the now-infamous -- but once largely swept under the rug -- Chelsea putdown uttered by John McCain back in 1998. (Will Bunch at his popular Attytood blog brought it my attention again.) The media, by and large, failed to repeat it back then, or since, noting only that it was quite foul and leaving it at that. At a GOP fundraiser, McCain quipped: "Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because her father is Janet Reno." Here is the full story, and how the media handled it, from my old colleague David Corn.
http://www.salon.com/news/1998/06/25newsb.html