Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
About Chris Cillizza  |  On Twitter: The Fix and The Hyper Fix  |  On Facebook  |  On YouTube  |  RSS Feeds RSS Feed

McGahn Staying Put at NRCC

Don McGahn, the lead lawyer for House Republicans' campaign arm, will not be named to fill a GOP vacancy on the Federal Election Commission; instead, he will stay with the National Republican Congressional Committee for the duration of the cycle.

A source familiar with the selection process, who spoke without attribution because of the sensitive nature of the matter, said that McGahn made it through the background check without a hitch, but there were concerns that it would be difficult to replace him quickly at the NRCC with less than a year remaining before the 2006 midterm elections. Another Republican requesting anonymity to speak candidly about a private matter said that worries regarding McGahn's past legal work for former Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas) might have made it difficult for him to be selected for the FEC post.

McGahn has held his NRCC job since 1999, while also maintaining a handful of private clients for a legal practice he opened following the 2004 election.

There are four openings on the six-member FECBrad Smith, a Republican, has already left the commission; three others are serving even though their officials terms have already expired (each plans to leave the commission for good when their successors are named).

President Bush is reportedly planning to fill the vacancies while Congress is in recess -- allowing his picks to serve until the start of the next Congress, a period of time that will cover the rewriting of a number of FEC regulations crafted in response to the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.

The White House's recess-appointment plan has provoked considerable negative reaction from editorial boards (including The Washington Post's), as well as the leading campaign finance watchdogs in Congress.  Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Russ Feingold (D-Wisc.), along with Reps. Chris Shays (R-Conn.) and Marty Meehan (D-Mass.) sent a letter to the President on Nov. 16 arguing against recess appointments to the FEC.

"In the past, recess appointments have been used as a means to place individuals on the FEC without sufficient scrutiny, leading the public and many in Congress to believe that their loyalties lie with the Congressional leaders who sponsored them," the four wrote. "Given the perpetual impotence of the FEC, it would be most unwise to maintain this approach."

By Chris Cillizza  |  November 28, 2005; 6:33 PM ET
Categories:  Fix Notes  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Rep. Cunningham Enters Guilty Plea, Resigns
Next: Political Scandal Scorecard

Comments

Good site

Posted by: Dublin Flats | March 22, 2006 10:29 AM | Report abuse

Such verbal sucre will not clear the palette of the American electorate in '06.
Surely you jest.

Posted by: RCD | November 29, 2005 2:16 PM | Report abuse

I just power dialed 267 unidentified sources who on the condition of anonymity candidly wanted to state: Let the really excellent lawyers like McGahn get to the posts where they can really help this country. It's his job to make sure the money is in compliance- among other things. It does worse than beg the question, to even imply that a relationship to someone so dubiously accused, could somehow implicate such a consumate professional's performance or appointability. If McGahn's work had been anything other than excellent he would not have held his post since 1999. Meanwhile I am glad he gets to stay to help Republicans.

Posted by: James O'Brien | November 29, 2005 11:57 AM | Report abuse

Absolute Nonsense. McGahn will be busier than a one armed Bruce Cutler in a wall papering contest as the NRCC, key players, operatives, and other associates are exposed for what they are: Criminal conspirators in a massive ongoing electoral criminal enterprise.

Posted by: RCD | November 29, 2005 11:30 AM | Report abuse

The suggestion that someone didn't get nominated to the FEC b/c he couldn't be replaced at the NRCC is silly. There's nothing unreplaceable about a political lawyer and no reason the Committee couldn't get its services from outside council if necessary. Seems clear that DeLay ties or something more serious was at the root of this decision.

Posted by: nrccoverfec? | November 28, 2005 7:45 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company