Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
About Chris Cillizza  |  On Twitter: The Fix and The Hyper Fix  |  On Facebook  |  On YouTube  |  RSS Feeds RSS Feed

House Leadership Election: Week Two

The Fix continues to track developments in the race to succeed Tom DeLay as House majority leader.  The biggest development in the contest this past week was the entrance of conservative Arizona Rep. John Shadegg --  a long-shot candidacy sure to complicate the winning formula for the two frontrunners.

And remember all you inside-the-Beltway types -- average Americans aren't particularly excited about this race.

To the handicapping:

* Missouri Rep. Roy Blunt: Blunt claimed this week that he has wrapped up the race, securing the 117 commitments from his colleagues necessary to remove the "acting" from the majority leader title he already has when the GOP conference votes on Feb. 2.  Blunt had made public the names of 85 Republicans supporting him, and his allies insist that number will rise into the low 90s shortly. Blunt remains the favorite, but his unwillingness to give up his whip post even while insisting he has the votes to win the majority leadership rings somewhat hollow.

* Ohio Rep. John Boehner: For the moment, Boehner seems content to partner with Shadegg in browbeating Blunt.  The two men have teamed up to call for Blunt to relinquish his whip position and debate them on national television about the majority leader post. Blunt has so far declined, issuing a statement from a group of his supporters arguing that he is speaking to members of the conference every day. Boehner boasts 90 total commitments, according to his supporters, who estimated that he has picked up 10 endorsements since Shadegg formally entered the contest.

* Arizona Rep. John Shadegg: Shadegg's formal entrance into the contest last weekend has stirred up the contest considerably, though few political operatives believe he can actually win.  Shadegg and Boehner seem to have formed a political union -- born largely of expediency -- to bring down Blunt.  Shadegg may garner significant support among the most conservative bloc of the GOP conference -- the Republican Study Committee -- on the first ballot, but assuming he is the lowest vote-getter of the three candidates it remains to be seen whether his backers will move in a bloc to either Boehner or Blunt in the second round. If the former, Boehner would have a real chance of ousting Blunt; if the Shadegg vote splinters or goes heavily toward Blunt, the second ballot won't be close.

By Chris Cillizza  |  January 20, 2006; 6:14 PM ET
Categories:  House , Republican Party  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Karl Rove -- Back From the Missing
Next: Insider Interview: Iowa Democratic Operative Jeff Link

Comments

Blunt is a crook and a Delay suckup. He is very high on Jack's list, so if they want reform (like arsenic) why not somebody decent. This is just another Republican swindle.

Posted by: Bill Rich | January 27, 2006 4:01 PM | Report abuse

Question: anyone think the Blount-Boehner-Shadegg race can stalemate and produce a winning dark horse candidate? Any likely prospects?

Posted by: robert chapman | January 21, 2006 2:43 PM | Report abuse

Blunt is part of the problem with Congress. He is party to Delay, Inc. For those who want to know about Delay Inc, it can be summarized as this. American Democracy is being sold to the highest bidder on K-Street. Nothing about Blunt strikes me as saying business will not be the same as ususal. In addition, Delay will be calling the shots from the back seat. Blunt must go. Americans liberties and democracy can not be bought by K-Street. If Blunt is elected, then the GOP_ must go, vote them out in 2006. All of them. Blunt is Delay's lap dog.

Posted by: db | January 21, 2006 6:25 AM | Report abuse

Blunt and Boehner are both classic examples of "Brezhnev Republicans." Shadegg is an authentic fiscal conservative but wrongheaded on most issues. However, he doesn't appear to be nearly as corrupt as the other two which is why he has zero chance of prevailing in the Republican conference.

http://www.intrepidliberaljournal.blogspot.com

P.S. Debra Howell should resign for professional conduct unbecoming to an obudsman. She has an integrity deficiency.

Posted by: Intrepid Liberal | January 20, 2006 8:47 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company