Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Buck, Romanoff look to wins at Colorado assembly

This week's wins by Rep. Joe Sestak (D) in Pennsylvania and ophthalmologist Rand Paul (R) in Kentucky were the clearest sign yet that voters this year are set on rejecting establishment candidates in favor of fresh faces.

This weekend, we could see further evidence of how that anti-incumbent mood is playing out in Colorado -- one of the swingiest of swing states.

In the state's Senate race, the two "establishment" candidates aren't likely to be nominated by their parties at their state assembly on Saturday, despite leading in the polls -- a prognosis less grim than it might seem, however, due to the relatively low bar for each candidate to petition their way onto the Aug. 10 primary ballot.

On the Republican side, former Lt. Gov. Jane Norton (R) has held a consistent lead over Weld County District Attorney Ken Buck (R), although some recent polls show him closing the gap.

Norton stunned many in her party in April when she announced that she was bypassing the assembly process in favor of petitioning her way on the ballot. Colorado Republican Party chairman Dick Wadhams responded by barring Norton from having any presence at the assembly.

Buck's campaign has been gearing up to make a showing this weekend, which they hope will build on the momentum he's been gaining following an endorsement by Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) and a $400,000 TV ad buy by Americans for Job Security.

Meanwhile, Democratic incumbent Sen. Michael Bennet (D), who has been leading former state House Speaker Andrew Romanoff (D) in public polls, has also opted to make his way onto the ballot via the petition process.

But unlike Norton, Bennet is not eschewing the state assembly. Bennet campaign sources say they're confident they'll reach the 30 percent threshold of delegates needed to make it onto the August 10 ballot, but even so, they're gearing up for an assembly win by Romanoff, who they call the "prohibitive favorite" in the caucus process.

The impact of Buck's and Romanoff's likely wins this weekend is widely open to debate due to the state's unique nominating process.

Unlike in Utah, where Sen. Bob Bennett (R) loss at the state party convention meant he had no other option to get on the ballot other than to run as a write-in, candidates in Colorado also have the option of petitioning their way onto the ballot by submitting 1,500 signatures from registered party members in each of the state's seven House districts.

Moreover, both Bennet -- rocking the single "t"! -- and Norton have sought to cast the caucus process itself as an insider-dominated affair. Norton has played up her efforts to collect petitions as an effort to reach a broader portion of the GOP electorate, and a Norton spokesperson emphasized to the Fix yesterday that "we have to reach beyond party insiders."

A Bennet spokesperson noted that Bennet has "brought in a lot of new people" through the petition process, and Bennet himself remarked after losing to Romanoff in the March precinct caucuses that "as someone who isn't a political insider, tonight's support is especially meaningful." The Bennet campaign has long argued that as a former state House Speaker, Romanoff has spent years cultivating the very sort of people who attend precinct caucuses and state Assembly gatherings.


While both sides will compete to spin the results this weekend, recent Colorado electoral history suggests the caucus process isn't always the most reliable indicator of who will win: In 2004, neither then state Attorney General Ken Salazar (D) nor eventual GOP nominee Pete Coors (R), prevailed in their party caucuses, and from 1973 to 1998, just three Democrats who won in the caucus process ended up winning their party's nomination.

(Worth noting: On the Republican side, no candidate who has skipped the assembly entirely has ever won statewide, according to Buck spokesperson Owen Loftus.)

On top of that, Romanoff has to overcome Bennet's significant fundraising advantage. At the end of the first quarter, Bennet had more than $3.5 million cash-on-hand -- a seven-to-one advantage over Romanoff's $500,000 -- and has begun putting that money to work with a series of TV ads launched in March.

The money gap between Buck and Norton is narrower -- Norton had $643,000 cash-on-hand at the end of the first quarter, compared to $417,000 for Buck. With DeMint's backing, Buck's likely to see his fundraising rise -- but former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin (R) has hinted at a Norton endorsement, and will be visiting the state this weekend.

-- Felicia Sonmez

By The Fix  |  May 20, 2010; 12:11 PM ET
Categories:  Senate  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Blanche Lincoln, Bill Halter prepare for Arkansas Senate runoff
Next: Rand Paul's political problem

Comments

As Rand continues to step in it, I wonder how long this meme that he's some kind of leading indicator for an anti-incumbency revolt is going to continue.

Posted by: bsimon1 | May 20, 2010 2:02 PM | Report abuse

After being thrown under the bus like Rev. Wright, Specter is not voting with the democrats anymore ?

HHHMMmMmmm


.

Posted by: 37thand0street | May 20, 2010 1:45 PM | Report abuse

Rep. Clyburn is jumping up and down - practically giddy that he has SOMETHING HE CAN TWIST - into playing the RACE CARD.

This is getting ridiculous.


Rand Paul MADE CLEAR THAT HE HATES ALL FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION - period - he said it in a taped interview in April.

And yet Clyburn - is smiling from ear to ear - to complain that FINALLY HE HAS SOME STATEMENT THAT APPEARS TO BE ABLE TO TWIST INTO SOMETHING VAGUELY RACIST.


What a joke - it is NOT the Clyburn is ACTUALLY OFFENDED BY ANYTHING - OR THAT CLYBURN IS ACTUALLY CLAIMING ANY ACTUAL ACT OF DISCRIMINATION.


This IS WHAT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS ALL ABOUT NOW.


THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS A DISGRACE - CLYBURN IS A DISGRACE.


Rachel Maddow said "lunch counters" about 20 times last night - ARE THERE ANY LUNCH COUNTERS LEFT - ANYWHERE ?

Posted by: 37thand0street | May 20, 2010 1:37 PM | Report abuse

Does Bumblingberry know that someone at the Washington Examiner named Susan Ferrechio is COPYING his posts and running them as her own?

I'm feeling for you, Bumblingberry :'-(

Posted by: margaretmeyers | May 20, 2010 1:36 PM | Report abuse

Liuberal "leadership" on display.

Senate Democratic leaders were eager to pass a Wall Street reform bill this week. But they were sidelined by their own party and were not able to round up 60 votes needed to end debate on the legislation, a failure which will at the very least stall final passage. The Senate voted 57-42 on the motion, losing three Democratic votes. Sens. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., and Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., voted against ending debate and Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Pa., was a no-show after losing his primary Tuesday night.

Hey, it is bipartisanship now.

Posted by: bumblingberry | May 20, 2010 12:41 PM | Report abuse

North Korea said Thursday that South Korea fabricated evidence implicating the North in a torpedo attack in order to pick on the North
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
We can count on the same utterly weak response that we are now used to from Obambi.

Posted by: bumblingberry | May 20, 2010 12:31 PM | Report abuse

Bye folks!

Posted by: drindl | May 20, 2010 12:14 PM


didn't even last two minutes.

Rant on loony tunes.

Posted by: bumblingberry | May 20, 2010 12:30 PM | Report abuse

It isn't anti-incumbency -- it's republican anti-incumbency.


"Republican operatives orchestrated the tea party movement to lay the foundation for Republican electoral gains. However, the far right tea parties have been uncontrollable, demanding that Republican candidates support extreme positions like eliminating Social Security, Medicare, the Department of Education, and even the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Paul's success has already sent ripples throughout the GOP establishment, with other ramifications in Kentucky and for upcoming GOP primaries:

- Todd Lally, an extremist who has said that President Obama wouldn't be able to get a security clearance, road Paul's coattails to defeat the establishment-backed candidate Jeff Reetz in the primary for Kentucky's third congressional district. Reetz is a Pizza Hut franchise owner who received financial support from the National Republican Campaign Committee (NRCC).

- Vauhn Ward, Sarah Palin endorsed Republican candidate in Idaho's first congressional district, is quickly losing favor with the Republican primary voters. The tea party-backed candidate, State Rep. Raul Labrador, is surging in the polls against Ward. NRCC leaders like chairman Rep. Pete Sessions (R-TX) has hosted a fundraiser for Ward.

- In Pennsylvania's third district yesterday, voters chose tea party candidate Mike Kelly over NRCC-endorsed candidate Paul Huber.

- In the Colorado U.S. Senate race, far right tea party candidate Ken Buck is surging in the polls against Jane Norton, the longtime Republican politician chosen by the National Republican Senatorial Committee to run.

As ThinkProgress reported earlier this year, extreme tea party candidates have sought to purge Republican incumbents and handpicked GOP candidates in races all over the country."

Posted by: drindl | May 20, 2010 12:19 PM | Report abuse

"This week's wins by Rep. Joe Sestak (D) in Pennsylvania and ophthalmologist Rand Paul (R) in Kentucky were the clearest sign yet that voters this year are set on rejecting establishment candidates in favor of fresh faces."

NO. Let me explain again. Specter was rejected because he was a REPUBLICAN who kowtowed to Bush. Can you really not understand that? Is your Grand Narrative so important you want to ignore facts?

Posted by: drindl | May 20, 2010 12:16 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company