Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Experience the full Washington Post investigation:

Corporate Fundraising, Fa La La La La La La La La

Congressional investigators and the Justice Department are questioning whether Sierra Nevada (no, not the beer makers, but an intelligence and defense company heavily involved in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan) received special favors in exchange for campaign contributions to lawmakers.

Sierra Nevada, based in Sparks, Nev., is one of hundreds of companies that grew rapidly after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks as the government poured money into its counterterrorism efforts.

A look at shows that Sierra Nevada received $431.6 million in government contracts for fiscal year 2008, the most recent year for which data are available. Its biggest clients included the U.S. Air Force, the Army, the Navy and the U.S. Secret Service.

In the campaign finance case, investigators allege that U.S. Rep. Peter Visclosky (D-Ind.), a member of the defense appropriations subcommittee, solicited contributions from Sierra Nevada and other clients of the now-closed lobbying firm PMA Group. A story on said Visclosky then provided the companies with special access to him and his staff while the firms secured large contracts.

PMA's founder and owner Paul J. Magliocchetti had his own troubles.

A Sierra Nevada executive discussed the company's political contributions in e-mails, investigators found.

Dave Klingler, a vice president of Sierra Nevada, told a co-worker in a 2007 e-mail, "Tis' the fundraiser season again." He also outlined the company's plans for "supporting our FY08 pursuits," adding that "we have Visclosky and (U.S. Rep. John) Murtha events coming up quickly." Murtha (D-Pa.) chaired the defense appropriations subcommittee. He died in February.

In another email, Klingler explained why he thought Sierra Nevada's political action committee should give $30,000 to Visclosky and Murtha. He wrote: "That's what each of the companies working with PMA and Visclosky have been asked to contribute. He has been a good supporter of SNC [Sierra Nevada Corp.] We have gotten over $10 million in adds from him."

The federal Office of Congressional Ethics has sent its investigation of the ties between Sierra Nevada and lawmakers to the Justice Department. The agency is expected to look at whether Visclosky violated the law or U.S. House rules by soliciting or accepting contributions in exchange for securing contracts.

By Dana Hedgpeth  |  August 18, 2010; 8:51 AM ET
 | Tags: Congress, Contracting, Fundraising, Justice Department  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Pentagon could save $5.4 billion
Next: Enough to make your head spin


is this any different than Franks, Dodd et al getting sweetheart mortgage loans that are the CAUSE of the economic collapse?

time to stop blaming the GOP and "failed Bush policies".

The American dream is NOT that everyone has a right to own their own home. The American dream IS that everyone have the OPPORTUNITY to earn their own way ... etc. etc. etc.

Today, The U.S. is on the wrong path to recovery.

To correct: Extend the Bush tax cuts, support business investment, reverse unconscionable UNION CONTRACTS and put Americans back to work.

Posted by: esquire2 | August 18, 2010 10:20 AM | Report abuse


This journalist has been blocked from posting to the page. I believe may be due to malicious interception and tampering with my telecommunications by a rogue U.S. gov't surveillance/censorship regime (perhaps supplemented by a slander campaign directed at WaPo staff).

These are the articles a rogue multi-agency fusion center network apparently seeks to censor. I believe my findings may be of interest to your effort, especially my reporting centering on U.S. Patent No. 7629918, held by Raytheon:

Posted by: scrivener50 | August 18, 2010 11:22 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company