Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
About this Blog   |   On Twitter   |   Follow us on Facebook   |   RSS Feeds RSS Feed

Feder Building Campaign Warchest

Steve Fehr

Judy Feder, who is seeking the Democratic nomination for Congress in the 10th District, announced today she raised $600,000 in 2007, including almost $250,000 during the last three months of the year.

Feder, a professor at Georgetown, is trying to unseat Rep. Frank R. Wolf (R-Va.) for the second time. Mike Turner also has filed as a Democratic candidate. The primary is June 10.

Although Wolf easily defeated her In 2006, Feder proved herself to be a proficient fundraiser, having raised over $1.6 million for that campaign

By Steve Fehr  |  January 15, 2008; 11:02 AM ET
Categories:  Election 2008/Congress , Tim Craig  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Gilmore, GOP Hire New Staff
Next: Kaine Takes Question On Clinton's Electability


It really would not matter how much Feder raised, she is perhaps the most unelectable politician in our great commonwealth.

Come on now, no one who has made her living pushing Hillary's mandatory (you coudl be a criminal if you don't sign up) socialized medicine plan can get elected in a moderate-conservative district. No borderline-socialist can get elected in this district. Feder is about as far left off the deep end as you go. This kind of candidate could actually hurt Mark Warner's chances in the 10th.

Posted by: 10thvoter | January 15, 2008 11:54 AM | Report abuse

DC doesn't need any more representatives.

Posted by: Anonymous | January 15, 2008 12:33 PM | Report abuse

Georgetown deserves another Congressman!

Posted by: Judy | January 15, 2008 2:41 PM | Report abuse

Ah, I see the trolls have showed up to spew the standard talking points: Socialist, liberal!

Seriously, it's ridiculous. Judy's position's are relatively moderate, perhaps more progressive than some, but hardly liberal.

The talking point I really love is the one about how Judy might actually hurt Warner's candidacy. what idiot came up with that talking point?

Though, if that's the line of thinking, I suppose maybe we should wonder aloud if, hmmm, George Bush might do some damage to Wolf's candidacy?

For those who claim Judy is a socialist, lefty liberal, I'd like to see some evidence.

By the way, that "socialize medicine plan" you're talking about. Yeah, it's pretty much the standard for every Dem running for president (including the moderate Edwards) and it's pretty much the reason the Democrats are kicking the ass of every Republican candidate in every poll known to man kind.

An overwhelming majority of Americans support universal healthcare, it's not even a question good luck with that talking point in Nov.

Posted by: Just sayin' | January 15, 2008 3:29 PM | Report abuse

Evidence that Feder is liberal? How about Hillarycare to start. Mandatory forced socialized medicine? I guess you have never had to hear Feder's talking points...

"An overwhelming majority of Americans support universal healthcare"....Ha,Ha,Ha, very funny. Only the extreme socialist liberals support mandatory government run socialized medicine.

Feder is far and away the most liberal candidate in D.C. oh I mean Virginia. No borderline socialist liberal college professor candidate will win in a moderate district. What a waste of time!

Posted by: 10thvoter | January 15, 2008 10:20 PM | Report abuse

I'm sure DC has more socialist representatives, but do they really deserve another?

Posted by: Anonymous | January 16, 2008 11:54 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company