Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
About this Blog   |   On Twitter   |   Follow us on Facebook   |   RSS Feeds RSS Feed

Chesterbrook Precinct: Deeds voters frustrated with Deeds

Many voters for Creigh Deeds here at the Chesterbrook precinct in McLean are to varying degrees, publicly and privately, expressing a range of dissatisfaction - from frustration to disdain - with the way that the Democrat ran his campaign after winning his party's June primary.

The line has thinned out here, and we're in the midday doldrums before an expected afternoon rush. Many voters - a majority of the perhaps 20 or so we spoke with in the last hour - are indeed backing Deeds, but they aren't particularly confident about his chances. And they're frustrated about what they expect will be a significant setback in their quest to build a self-sustaining Democratic coalition that can control the Commonwealth.

Greg McLerran, a 75-year-old Democrat, said he voted against Republican Robert McDonnell as much as he voted for Deeds, whom he described as a "terrible candidate" devoid of charisma.

"I didn't get the feeling he had any ideas," he said. "What's he planning to do? Every ad he ran on TV was always knocking another guy on his polices."

Democrat Tom Van Waver, 49, second-guessed the Deeds campaign decision to attack Robert McDonnell on social issues, like abortion. That made the race divisive and probably hurt Deeds more than it helped in parts of the state where he could have fared more strongly, the attorney said.

Others said that Deeds should have spent more time talking about the economy and emphasized social issues less.

Both McLerran and Van Waver voted for Deeds at this precinct in June because they thought the other two - Brian Moran and Terry McAuliffe - would not be good statewide candidates. They've both wavered a little in recent weeks.

"Hard to say," Van Waver said, as he left the polling place, musing over how he'd vote if the Democratic primary were held again today. "How badly would McAuliffe run? He definitely would have had a lot of money."

By James Hohmann  |  November 3, 2009; 1:16 PM ET
Categories:  Election Day '09: Chesterbrook Precinct  | Tags: Chesterbrook Precinct  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: McDonnell votes, greets voters
Next: Chesterbrook Precinct: Comstock makes her pitch in delegate race

Comments

It disgusts me how The Washington Post has hijacked the Virginia gubernatorial election for its own political agenda. You have turned a local election in a state that has hundreds of thousands of Washington Post subscribers and online readers into a referendum on the Obama administration. This crass use of our government for your own interests has grossly insulted Virginians and has detracted the voters from urgent issues of great importance that affect our lives on a daily basis.

Whether it is a story about the horse race between two ideologies or a story about how it is a story about the national implications for both political parties, it is nothing more than a co-opting of an election for your own self interests.

Missing were in depth articles on the potential policies of either candidate on health care, the environment, higher education, schools, energy, mental health or gun control. Since you didn't write about these issues with any level of commitment, the candidates were able to avoid any discussion of their positions on these issues of grave consequence to all Virginians.

The previous Ombudsman, Deborah Howell, warned you clearly and concisely about the dangers of ignoring the needs of your local readership. Yet you turned a blind eye and deaf ear to those warnings with reckless abandonment. Your disregard for your readers in Virginia is unforgivable.

Posted by: thuff7 | November 3, 2009 1:58 PM | Report abuse

thuff7:
ditto. extremely well said. thank you.

Posted by: pthrelf1 | November 3, 2009 10:29 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company