Budget problems prompt Fairfax to charge for info
It's not surprising that cash-strapped localities are looking for ways to save. What is surprising is that only one Washington-area jurisdiction is changing its policy regarding charging for public information requests from news organizations while others are not.
Last week The Washington Post inquired about getting a list of salaries of public employees from Fairfax County, an almost annual tradition. For many years The Post, in its weekly Extra print editions, published a county-by-county look at each local government's payroll figures. In recent years those stories have become less frequent, but the information still is used in the reporting and writing of other stories on the local government beat, namely stories that deal with county budgets.
But this year, The Post was told that the information, which had been provided free of charge through a waiver granted to most media organizations, would come at a price.
The Fairfax County salary figures, depending on the way they are analyzed and distributed, would cost between $150 and $600, according to Merni Fitzgerald, a county spokeswoman who received a similar request for the information from the Washington Examiner.
The Examiner, Fitzgerald said, decided not to pay for the information.
Virginia's Freedom of Information Act allows governments to charge for reasonable costs incurred in collecting the requested records. But other jurisdictions say they're not changing their policies regarding FOIA requests from media organizations.
In Virginia, Loudoun County typically waives fees if the cost is below $20, said spokesman Jim Barnes. Otherwise, the fees stand. Prince William County doesn't charge for media information requests unless a "huge amount of staff or paper" are used, said spokeswoman Nikki Brown.
"More often than not, we don't charge," Brown said.
In Maryland, Montgomery County doesn't charge for requests from the press "since they all ask for a waiver of fees," according to county spokesman Patrick Lacefield. Prince George's County spokesman James P. Keary says the county always has charged for research and copying, regardless of the applicant, but that if the media request is a simple one, say a copy of a report or a list of salaries, it is provided free of charge.
So if most other Washington-area localities aren't changing their FOIA policies during equally tough budget times, why is Fairfax?
Fitzgerald notes that every local government deals with FOIA requests differently and that state code allows for the reimbursement of costs. For the salary FOIA, for example, Fairfax is not charging for the time spent by county personnel to pull together the public records. It is charging for the "computer runs" used to process the data.
"Last budget year, our economic situation prompted a reduction in force and many service and programming cuts, and we will see next week what is being proposed for this year," Fitzgerald said. "Nothing is off the table -- and user fees, which charge folks for services performed, whether RECenter fees or fees for FOIA requests, are one way to assist in the effort to balance the budget."
February 15, 2010; 10:56 AM ET
Categories: Fairfax County
Save & Share: Previous: Democrats postpone this year's Jefferson Jackson dinner
Next: Senate committee rejects death penalty expansion
Posted by: mherd1 | February 15, 2010 10:46 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: slydell | February 16, 2010 8:04 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: Mike40 | February 16, 2010 8:36 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: nogov4me | February 16, 2010 9:33 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: drkly | February 16, 2010 12:16 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: marklandterrapins | February 16, 2010 1:32 PM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.