Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
About this Blog   |   On Twitter   |   Follow us on Facebook   |   RSS Feeds RSS Feed

Maryland, Virginia separated by $1 billion on health care

Rosalind Helderman

Oh what a difference a river makes.

On the same day, Gov. Bob McDonnell (R) announced that initial state estimates show Virginia will lose $1 billion over 12 years in increased Medicaid costs from federal health care reform, and Maryland Gov. Martin O'Mally (D) announced his state will save money from the bill.

How much money?

$1 billion.

You can read about O'Malley's announcement on the Maryland Politics blog.

One reason for the discrepancy may be that states that have been funding some of the new benefits in the bill locally will now have a federal funding partner. For instance, Maryland has already been allowing young adults to remain on their parents' health insurance. But states that have not been offering these benefits will now have to pony up.

Another reason, of course, could be politics, given the Dems control Annapolis and the GOP leads in Richmond.

We've asked to see documentation from Virginia's Department of Medical Assistance Services, which drew up the figures and will provide them when we see them.

McDonnell meanwhile released a statement on the health care vote this afternoon.

"The continued intrusion of this Congress into the free enterprise system, and the placing of new mandates on states, is shocking to the American system of federalism," he said.

The full statement is below.

Full statement from Gov. Bob McDonnell:

Expanding access to reasonably priced quality healthcare is a bipartisan goal. We all agree that we must make it easier for Americans to purchase and retain health insurance.

However, this massive and complex piece of legislation allows the federal government to exercise control over one-sixth of the United States economy. The continued intrusion of this Congress into the free enterprise system, and the placing of new mandates on states, is shocking to the American system of federalism.

Most disconcerting is the provision mandating that every American must purchase health insurance or face a monetary penalty. This is an unprecedented expansion of federal power. It is hard to imagine our Founder's agreeing that the United States Constitution permits Congress to mandate the purchase of a good or service under penalty of law.

Just a few days ago I approved a bill, passed on a bipartisan basis, which prohibits mandatory insurance purchases for Virginians. Virginia's Attorney General has rightly chosen to challenge the constitutionality of the federal mandate. I anticipate that he will be joined by a number of other states. The issues raised by Attorney General Cuccinelli require a full and prompt review by the judicial branch.

While individuals face a mandate in this legislation, so too do the states. The proposed expansion of Medicaid is an historic unfunded federal mandate on the states. This expansion will put at least 400,000 more individuals on Virginia's Medicaid rolls. The Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services has estimated that it will cost the Commonwealth an additional $1.1 billion by 2022. Virginia, and the other 49 states, will bear the financial burden of one of the biggest unfunded mandates in the history of our nation.

This will have a significant and unavoidable impact on the bottom line of our state budget, and the general fiscal welfare of Virginia. We simply cannot afford this expansion.
The bill will cut over $500 billion from Medicare, and may reduce the quality of the care our seniors depend upon. The Medicare system is already underfunded and overburdened.

This legislation only exacerbates the problems facing the system.
This legislation will raise taxes on individuals and businesses. Our small business owners, who generate nearly 98% of the new jobs in Virginia, will see their taxes go up. This will occur at the same time that federal tax cuts from the early part of last decade expire.

We will face significantly higher federal taxes at a time when we need to be keeping taxes low and freeing capital for job creation and economic development. It can also be anticipated that Virginians' insurance premiums will increase in the years ahead after passage of this legislation.

I am further disappointed that a bill so massive in size is so limited in its approach. Congressional Republicans were right to call for allowing the purchase of health insurance across state lines, and this provision should have been included in the bill.
States have long been leaders in the effort to identify and implement innovative healthcare solutions. Regardless of the future of this legislation, we must continue to play that important role in our federal system.

In Virginia we will promote incentives for the purchase of long term care, and promote individual medical savings accounts. We will focus on preventative health and combating obesity. We will study our medical delivery systems with the objective of reforming them to work better for our citizens. Free clinics are an important piece of the coverage equation, and I will look for ways by which the Commonwealth can help with the expansion of these important facilities. We will be aggressive in finding every way by which we can reduce the cost of our Medicaid system, which has already grown 1600% in the past 25 years. It is unsustainable.

Every American should have the opportunity to purchase good quality healthcare coverage. But we will not improve our healthcare system by implementing a massive one-size fits all federal policy that dramatically increases the deficit, puts unprecedented mandates on states and individuals, and jeopardizes the good coverage most citizens already have. I am disappointed in the passage of this bill, and I thank the bipartisan majority of Virginia's congressional delegation for voting against it."

By Rosalind Helderman  |  March 22, 2010; 6:23 PM ET
Categories:  Robert F. McDonnell , Rosalind Helderman  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Virginia Democrats say Cuccinelli suit wastes taxpayer money
Next: McDonnell to headline high-dollar GOP fundraiser next month


Let's see, Bob McDonnell has been Gov for 2 months and he has stripped about protections for gay state employees and he is now trying to make sure all of us, AND our most vulnerable citizens, don't get to participate in history-making Health insurance reform.

In the last century, it was in Virginia that public schools were closed so they wouldn't have to desegregate.

You would think an honorable leader in Virginia would have wanted to act differently this time.

50 years from now, I guess they'll have to apologize again.

Posted by: rebeccajm | March 22, 2010 8:28 PM | Report abuse

Good luck to Cooch and Bob in making their case against HCR before the SCOTUS!

When that fails, consider trying secession as that worked out so well in the 19th century.

Posted by: TomPaine2 | March 22, 2010 9:49 PM | Report abuse

As a native Northern Virginian I can't beleive what's happening in my home state that I used to be proud of.
I took exception to Ms. Palin's statement about "Real Virginia" and "Fake Virginia" during the campaigns and laughed it off but now I see that my home state has been hijacked by crazy people like her.
The US Constitution like the Bible is open to interpretation and used to justify actions to serve the political ambitions of those that are in it for their own glory.
These folks are on YOUR PAYROLL!!

Posted by: mjgoslin | March 23, 2010 5:47 AM | Report abuse

Just let Cooch sound more and more crazy. At least then when he tries to run for Governor in 2013 or Senate, Northern VA can see him for what he really is (a crazy social conservative) and not vote for him.

Posted by: NoVAredsox | March 23, 2010 7:26 AM | Report abuse

NoVAredsox ~ how about this ~ that Maryland's accountants are telling lies (because their top end Democrats WANT to impose Obamakkkare on everybody) while Virginia's accountants are telling the truth (because their top end Republicans are required by the state law to balance the budget).

We all know the difference between the Zone East of the Potomac and that West of the Potomac, whether it's crime rates, number of politicians who need sent to prison for stealing, STD rates, murder rates, bad drivers, you name it.

Frankly, anyone in Virginia who doesn't like what's going on here can move to a community you like in MD, and vice versa.

Bringing MD nonsense to VA would be ridiculous, and no one in VA wishes to share with MD.

Time you Leftwingtards learn that elections have consequences. Your boy lost ~ our guy is in, and that's that.

Posted by: muawiyah | March 23, 2010 8:08 AM | Report abuse

One reason for the discrepancy may be that states that have been funding some of the new benefits in the bill locally will now have a federal funding partner.

Because everyone knows the federal government is flush with loads of cash.

Posted by: SaltLick | March 23, 2010 8:23 AM | Report abuse

free shipping
competitive price
any size available
accept the paypal

Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33

Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&g) $35
Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16
Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30
Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $16
New era cap $15

Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $25

Posted by: aqwohennia | March 23, 2010 9:29 AM | Report abuse

The attorney general and governor of VA will attempt to re-write all the laws to reflect their agenda. Politics at its worst. I love the way the conservatives talk about "all" Americans and "all" Virginians. They will try to exclude everyone who does not agree. Let's get government out of our lives unless you are a woman, a non-white citizen, non-Christian, legal immigrant, gay, lesbian -- then we will tell you what you can and can't do. What hypocrits!

Posted by: Flowerchild2 | March 23, 2010 9:51 AM | Report abuse

another $1 billion to pay for it?

time to cut the sacred cows: education and law enforcement.

Posted by: millionea7 | March 23, 2010 10:38 AM | Report abuse

Why didn't the Washington Post ask for detailed figures from MD? Another case of bias by the Post.

Posted by: melador | March 23, 2010 10:47 AM | Report abuse

>>"It is hard to imagine our Founder's [sic] agreeing that the United States Constitution permits Congress to mandate the purchase of a good or service under penalty of law."

Congress mandates the purchase of various goods and services every time they take our money in the form of taxes/fees/etc and spend it. Be it on highway guardrails, tanks, social security, or health insurance, this spending amounts to the same thing. Sounds to me like Bob is being a little dramatic, as are his cohorts in congress who have no problem forcing people to pay for things that are in their political interest.

Posted by: tew3x | March 23, 2010 1:01 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company