Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
About this Blog   |   On Twitter   |   Follow us on Facebook   |   RSS Feeds RSS Feed

Webb accuses Pentagon of 'stiff-arming' Virginia on JFCOM closure

Sen. James Webb (D-Va.) turned up the heat on the Pentagon Tuesday over the proposed closure of the Joint Forces Command, using a Senate hearing to amplify his complaints about the move and accuse the Defense Department of stonewalling.

The proposed closure of JFCOM, which is based in the Hampton Roads area, has become a major economic concern for that region and a tense political issue for the entire state. Virginia's congressional delegation has been working together across party lines to protest the move, with the help of Gov. Robert McDonnell (R).

The closure is part of Defense Secretary Robert Gates' ambitious plan to make the Pentagon's budget more efficient in anticipation of possible future cutbacks. The state's members of Congress have written repeatedly to the Pentagon demanding to know how scrapping JFCOM would save money in the long term without jeopardizing national security.

At Tuesday's Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, Webb accused Pentagon officials of deliberately withholding information from the state delegation, both before the decision was made and after the delegation demanded justification for it.

"I believe in another sport it's called 'stiff-arming,'" Webb said, complaining that he only got a phone call informing him of Gates' decision 15 minutes before it was publicly announced. And, Webb added, the decision itself stemmed from a series of meetings to which "we did not have access, we did not have the chance to provide input."

Webb said that the Pentagon's failure to provide much of the "basic data" he and his colleagues have requested "has led me to conclude that there is no comprehensive analysis" to back up the decision. He said it raises "the larger question about how serious DOD really is about lasting reform on a larger scale."

Deputy Defense Secretary William J. Lynn III, the witness who bore the brunt of Webb's ire, said his department would cooperate with lawmakers' requests for information.

"I'll look into those questions and get you the data as soon as we can," he said.

Armed Services Chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich.) backed Webb up, saying that while Gates has a "legitimate objective" in sight, "it appears there was inadequate analysis and inadequate openness in the procedure which proceeded his August announcement."

Gates has at least one ally on the panel.

"I strongly support that proposal," Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), the committee's top Republican, said of the JFCOM plan.

That stance could become even more important in 2011, as McCain will become chairman of the Armed Services Committee if Republicans manage to capture the Senate in November.

Lynn said Gates had concluded that JFCOM and a handful of other offices and organizations "no longer effectively satisfy the purpose for which they were created," and that many of their functions "can be managed effectively elsewhere"

Lynn added that the Pentagon "is committed to working with the effected communities" to ease the stress of the closures.

Under questioning from Levin, Lynn said the decision to close JFCOM came after roughly 30 meetings on the subject.

"The conclusion at the end of those meetings was that those purposes" for which the command was established "no longer justified a four-star military command with a billion-dollar budget," Lynn said.

Though Gates has recommended JFCOM be closed, Lynn confirmed that President Obama "has not yet made a decision."

Lynn's prepared testimony said JFCOM employs more than 3,000 people and an additional 3,000 contractors, with a total annual budget of close to $1 billion. The command is much larger than it was in 2000, "without any significant expansion of its mission or responsibilities."

Lynn told Sen. Joseph Lieberman (D-Conn.) that there was no final estimate yet of the cost savings the closure would yield, but "we think we will be able to save a substantial portion of that billion dollars."

For all the talk of money, Lynn told Webb that "this was not a business-case analysis, as some have described it. This was a military decision."

"There are no decisions of this magnitude that are military decisions," Webb responded, saying that questions like this must be made by civilian officials like Gates and, ultimately, Obama.

The audience at Tuesday's hearing included aides to McDonnell, and Suffolk Mayor Linda Johnson. (JFCOM's Suffolk campus employs roughly 2,200 people.)

Lynn said he would work on arranging a meeting between Virginia's congressional delegation, McDonnell and Gates. McDonnell said Tuesday on WTOP's monthly Ask the Governor program that he had been trying to get a meeting with Gates on the JFCOM issue and was disappointed that it hadn't happened yet.

The House Armed Services Committee will hold a hearing on the same subject with the same witnesses Wednesday morning. Rep. Glenn Nye (D), a member of that panel who represents much of the Hampton Roads area, has been accused by his Republican campaign opponent of not doing enough to fight the closure.

By Ben Pershing  | September 28, 2010; 12:28 PM ET
Categories:  Ben Pershing, Glenn Nye, James Webb, Robert F. McDonnell  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: McDonnell reports little progress overturning JFCOM closure
Next: Beer and wine wholesaler analysis shows spirits excise tax hike under McDonnell ABC plan



Posted by: whitneyuevans | September 28, 2010 2:32 PM | Report abuse

Get over it Webb, and get on with passing clean energy and jobs legislation. VA workers get $118 Billion/year from government investment and salaries and $7 Billion from the stimulus. Buck up, pay some taxes for roads, infrastructure and investment and stop suckling on the federal....

“Ten cents of every federal procurement dollar spent anywhere on Earth is spent in Virginia.”

Virginia has gotten $6.9 Billion of 100% Taxpayer funded stimulus funding while refusing only the $125 Million in unemployment benefits for the people most in need of help and the $250 million in education funds to improve and standardize students progress.

Posted by: Airborne82 | September 28, 2010 5:16 PM | Report abuse

SecDef Gates already said VA will actually gain money as it's redirected to Navy facilities and capabilities. 2010 Defense budget is $722 Billion all of which is borrowed deficit spending money. End the Tax subsidies for the Wealthiest people, and Rich Oil, Cotton and Feedstock companies ($150~$200 Billion over 10 years to Rich farming conglomerates). Raise the Social Security Income limit to all income and not just the first 107k.

As more people have gotten wealthy, wealth has been shielded from the Social Security Tax as it has not kept up with inflation.

“Cutting Benefits Isn't the Way to Save Social Security: The answer isn't raising the retirement age; it's making the rich pay a fair share”

“Most people don't know that someone making $300,000 or even $30 million a year pays no more in Social Security taxes than someone earning roughly $107,000. In 1983, 90 percent of wage and salary income was taxed, but today it's less than 84 percent. That's a huge windfall for the rich and a serious shortfall for Social Security.”

End the Estate tax giveaway to Millionaires and Billionaires who pay $0.00 in estate taxes in 2010. Estate Taxes and the USA deficit:

The current Estate Tax giveaway to the Rich is costing the USA $300~700 Billion between 2009 and 2018.

Posted by: Airborne82 | September 28, 2010 5:26 PM | Report abuse


Do you know why there is a SS cap? It's because you get back what you pay in and you'll never get back more than a percentage of the capped amount. People who earn 3 million/year will not get any more benifits than people earning $160K/year so why should they pay more? SS was not meant to be a wealth redistribution tool or even a "tax." It was designed for retirement security.

If Congress removes the cap then it is admitting that SS is just another wealth redistribution tax.

And what does that have to do with the closure of JFCOM?

Posted by: jww2 | September 29, 2010 10:00 AM | Report abuse

Because Social Security is projected for shortfalls and Senator Webb should be spending more time addressing that issue than trying to milk more money out of the Feds for Virginia.

The income disparity in America is becoming a National Security issue as much as economic security. Ensuring a safe and stable society is everyone's responsibility and social security benefits are a big part of that. Generally not a single dime of social security goes towards anything but paying for the most basic of needs; food, shelter, and transportation. Greater wealth is built with the contribution of hundreds and thousands of others so all that wealth should contribute to Social Security benefits and society as a whole.

Posted by: Airborne82 | September 29, 2010 11:09 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company