Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
About this Blog   |   On Twitter   |   Follow us on Facebook   |   RSS Feeds RSS Feed

Senate Republicans agree to withhold public comment on ABC privatization plan

Anita Kumar

We know Senate Democrats are generally opposed to Republican Gov. Bob McDonnell's proposal to privatize the state's 76-year-old liquor monopoly. And we know some House Republicans have criticized the plan, leading the governor's staff to be miffed.

So where does that leave the Senate Republicans on the issue?

Sen. Tommy Norment, the Republican leader in the senate, said in an interview, that his caucus's 18 members have met to talk about McDonnell's proposal, but made a pact to withhold public comments -- both praise or criticism -- for now.

Norment said he knows some might accuse Senate Republicans of getting off too easy by expressing no public opinion on the plan, but he said he sees no need to get involved when the plan is constantly changing. He said senators like to be "more measured and deliberative in their comments" rather than "pop off at the legislative mouth."

"We decided why don't we keep our powder dry until we know what happens? Why get drawn into this debate?'' he said. "We know it's a work in progress and does not represent the final plan."

McDonnell wants to privatize sales of distilled spirits from wholesale to distribution to retail as a way to to provide a one-time windfall of at least $458 million for roads.

In recent weeks, he has made significant changes to the proposal, eliminating a 1 percent tax on annual sales by wholesalers and a 2.5 percent fee on restaurants that choose to buy their liquor directly from wholesalers, producing less for the state on an annual basis. He has pledged to use dozens of reform proposals to streamline government to replace the $47 million Virginia would lose by implementing the proposal.

Norment said Republican senators unanimously agree that the state should not be in the liquor business, but that they still need to see how the proposal changes and are eagerly awaiting an analysis from the legislature's investigative arm, which will finish examining McDonnell's proposal by next month.

Norment said he would personally be "cool" to the plan if it continues to cost the state $47 million a year -- one of the most common criticisms of the plan by Democrats and Republicans.

By Anita Kumar  | October 19, 2010; 10:51 AM ET
Categories:  Anita Kumar, Liquor privatization, Robert F. McDonnell, State Senate  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Loudoun supervisor Lori Waters won't seek re-election
Next: Alexandria real estate revenue higher than expected

Comments

So... Can any one tell me WHY the state should not be in the liquor business?? The state has been doing an INCREDIBLE job for the last 76 YEARS !!! Look at the profit it has made... By going PRIVATE, may I ask, who has the capital to buy a license except the wealthy? McBOB's friends I presume. AND,WHO is going to wind up paying for the lost revenue??? Why, we the individual tax payer, of course !!! Kill this stupid proposal as soon as possible !!!!

Posted by: nwcmbrg57 | October 20, 2010 10:24 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company