Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
About this Blog   |   On Twitter   |   Follow us on Facebook   |   RSS Feeds RSS Feed
Posted at 11:15 AM ET, 02/ 9/2011

McDonnell, 27 other governors ask Obama to support speedy Supreme Court review of health care law

By Rosalind S. Helderman
Rosalind S. Helderman

Twenty-eight governors, including Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell (R) are asking that President Obama direct the U.S. Justice Department to seek immediate review by the Supreme Court of constitutional challenges to the federal health care law filed in Virginia and Florida.

In a letter sent Wednesday, the governors argue their states need the certainty of a final resolution to the legal questions surrounding the law as they proceed with implementing the sweeping health care reforms. They note that there is no doubt that the constitutionality of a mandate that requires individuals to obtain health insurance by 2014 will ultimately be determined by the nation's highest court.

"We should not endure years of litigation in the circuit courts, when the Supreme Court
can promptly provide finality," they write.

The letter comes as Virginia Attorney Gen. Ken Cuccinelli (R) formally filed a petition with the Court Tuesday asking that justices hear Virginia's challenge immediately rather than waiting for the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals to rule.

A U.S. District Court judge in Virginia sided with Cuccinelli and ruled that Congress overstepped its constitutional authority with the individual mandate, and he had indicated last week that he would ask the Court to take the case up now.

A judge in Florida has likewise ruled the mandate unconstitutional in a case filed jointly by 26 states. Federal judges in two other cases filed by private parties have issued contradicting rulings, indicating they believe the mandate meets constitutional muster and, Obama has expressed confidence that the constitutionality of the law will ultimately be upheld.

The Justice department has indicated that it opposes bypassing appeals courts and legal experts have said the likelihood the court would take the cases now and forgo the benefit of additional judicial rulings is slight. Lawyers for the Obama administration have noted that the mandate does not go into affect in 2014, providing time for the legal challenges to work their way through the normal judicial channels.

By Rosalind S. Helderman  | February 9, 2011; 11:15 AM ET
Categories:  Barack Obama, Ken Cuccinelli, Robert F. McDonnell, Rosalind Helderman  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: UPDATED: Former Supreme Court Chief Justice Hassell dies
Next: Sen. James Webb won't run for reelection in 2012

Comments

These guys don't care about the real objectives of the american people. Where are the Jobs in each of these state. Get real or get out of the way!

That was yeasterdays fight. You lost move on!

Posted by: jayMaryland | February 9, 2011 11:50 AM | Report abuse

These guys don't care about the real objectives of the american people. Where are the Jobs in each of these state. Get real or get out of the way!

That was yeasterdays fight. You lost move on!

Posted by: jayMaryland | February 9, 2011 11:51 AM | Report abuse

These guys don't care about the real objectives of the american people. Where are the Jobs in each of these state. Get real or get out of the way!

That was yeasterdays fight. You lost move on!

Posted by: jayMaryland | February 9, 2011 11:52 AM | Report abuse

Congratulations Washington Post!!! This is the first article that I have read in your paper that does not refer to the federal health care law as Obamacare. There just may be hope for you yet. I'm proud of your journalistic integrity (at least in this article). Kudos!

Posted by: Raptoraddict | February 9, 2011 12:39 PM | Report abuse

Obama should be jumping at the chance

The SC will laugh at almost unanimous agreement that the bill is constitutional

Posted by: Bious | February 9, 2011 12:46 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company