Solomon: More to Come on 'Silent Injustice'
Reporter John Solomon, who worked with "60 Minutes" on the joint investigation of discredited FBI forensic science, says in his online Q&A today that he is continuing to report on this topic. He tells one reader that the findings of the investigation are especially important in the era of CSI television shows, when jurors are more likely than ever to give enormous weight to forensic science.
By The Editors |
November 19, 2007; 12:10 PM ET
Previous: Welcome to Washington Post Investigations |
Next: The High Price of Homeland Security
Posted by: kent | November 19, 2007 2:43 PM
If it is I'd like to see the judge call him that outside of the protection of his Court and Office. Be interesting to observe the lawsuit that followed.
Posted by: JR | November 19, 2007 6:13 PM
Post a Comment
We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.
User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.








If you have solid tips, news or documents on potential ethical violations or abuses of power, we want to know. Send us your suggestions.

Unfortunately I believe that we are limited in what we can focus on. I think that if we proceed with the partisan sideshow of prosecuting Bush admin. officials, healthcare will get lost in the brouhaha.
The Washington Post's permanent investigative unit was set up in 1982 under Bob Woodward.
Is this the same Tobin that a judge in Mass. recently called dishonest?